Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/28/2008 12:27:07 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

You really, really need to check your facts. Clyburn was on the fence for 
months. 

Clyburn was not a Clinton supporter. Neither was Pelosi or Brazile. All of 
this fence sitting was a farce.
 
 
 
 

Like many blacks in this country (me included) he was leaning toward Hillary 
Clinton. But Obama's success, 

with whites 
 
 

coupled with the Clinton's increasingly hostile and dirty tactics,

 
I don't understand why it is so wrong to attafck your opponet. She was his 
rival. What were they supposed to do, have a duel? Jeez Louise. She was a white 
woman attacking a black man. I guess that was the problem. 
 
 

made him lean toward Obama. I watched Clyburn in a live interview say that he 
called Bill Clinton personally to tell him he was going with Obama, and 
Clinton cussed at him. I heard Richardson say Clinton went off on him. Hell, 
Teddy 
Kennedy said the Clintons went off on him too. John Lewis here in Atlanta 
called to tell them, and he too said it didn't go well. I liked and like Bill 
and 
Hillary, but they did this to themselves.  You call Clyburn a dog, but it was 
the Clintons who acted like brutes, cursing and threatening and attacking 
people for having the temerity to back someone else. Tonight at the DNC, 
Clyburn 
said he liked the Clintons, still likes the Clintons. I have no problem with 
them, he said.He then said he still felt some of their comments could have 
been interpreted as racist, but that he still had no enduring problem with them.

 
Clybrun warned the Clintons that they should fall in line unless she and her 
supporters were going to lose their seat. 

 
How is that the posture of an angry dog?
 
And I'm really, really confused. What did Obama do to Hillary? How can you in 
the same night attack Obama and men for a sexist plot against Hillary, then 
say she came out swinging and he was meek. 

 
I never said that she was meek. She is a woman. Vilified for be a hard core 
bithc. Something that men don't like. 
 

 She lost this fight, and you are saying you'll never vote for him. 

 
No I will not. 
 

You are Black right?

 
Yes
 

Then tell me how a respectful Black man like Obama who speaks with nothing 
but respect for women is worse than McCain, who called his wife the c-word in 
public? 

 
He said that he did not. 
 

Tell me how you have contempt for Obama who has an intelligent, educated wife 
who I believe will bring more respect to the First Lady, while going with 
don't-say-too-much Cindy McCain?

 
I do not vote for first lady. 

 
You're entitled to your opinion, that's the American way. But if I could 
understand it as something other than an odd hatred of Obama, or men, or Black 
men--

LOL not this ish again. I am not a bitter lesbian. 
 
 

or all three--that'd be nice. If you think a white multi-millionaire like 
john McCain who supported a senseless invasion that will cost us trillions is 
better for you than a Black man who understands the struggles of being both 
Black 
and not wealthy, that's your right.  

 
That black man has not proven he undestands the sturggle of people. He cars 
about the corporations that put him there. 

 
I'm tired, mad at myself for staying up this late and doing this instead of 
writing or job searching.

 
Me too. It is the same fight when this topic comes up. 
 

But I say again--and finally--you seem to have a lot of hostility. 

 
Oh oh. Angry bitchlesbian Hillary support.  Keith  we both agreed las time 
that I was not hostile. 
 

I've read all your posts, and they seem to have a common theme of hatred for 
men,

 
Lesbian aler. Lesbian alert!!!
 
 

hatred for Black men,

 
40 plus cant find a man and over weight. All the brothers date outside their 
race!  LOL! 

and contempt for Black people who dare say the world's not fair to them.

 
The world is not fair. Especially to blacks who are moderates or republicans. 
 

i just don't get it

Liberals never do. 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/28/2008 12:11:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

You tend to get personal with people, Gymfig. Why is that? I disagree with 
you, but I don't get personal and LOsay stuff like nothing is ever humble with 
you. 

Keith are a very in depth writher and at times wordy. I know that everytine 
that see your posts you have something to say. It was not a personal attack.  
You have often joked about it yourself. 
 
 

That's insulting. You don't know me on the level to say I'm never humble. I 
think Tracey and Martin and many people in this group--with whom I've had civil 
discussions--would tell you i'm not arrogant, self-righteous, or intractable 
in my opinions. 

 
I never said that. 
 

 
 
Keith my family came from humber beginnings too. My fahter had to work and 
suppor the family. My mother and aunt  had law and education degress. 

 
 

But I'm not a dunce,  have opinions, and just beause I disagree with you, 
please don't say stuff like that. 

 
I never calle dyou stupid or other names. How dare you make such stuff up. 

 
I don't want to say this, but you honestly strike me as someone who dislikes 
Black people, and Black men in particular.

How long are you going to use this agument. I wont vote for a black man or 
black wman. I criticize popular black political thought. I do not see racism 
everywhere. Where do you get your viewpoints. 
 

I notice that you speak with contempt-not disagreement, but 
contempt--whenever racism is mentioned.

 
At times there is no racism. 
 

Rather than agree that racism still exists, and then say something like but 
it isn't our only problem (which all of us would agree on) you put down all 
Black people as seeking to be victims. 

 
It is true. I have issue with the afrocentric way of thinking. 

 But you always take the truth of racism--even when it's only one part of a 
much more complex discussion--and rake us over the coals for that. 

 
 
 
Like what. Why I enjoy the white Green Latern over the Black one? 

 
 
Keith I have not yelled at you, denoucned men at all. 
 
Also, what is your deal with men? I've noticed over and over and over that 
you seize on stuff and start this women can't make it work because of men 
talk. 

 
Where have I said that. You are taking small conversatons and framing them 
into I hate men. 

Frankly, you cry sexism way more than anyone in this group has ever cried 
racism. It's like this thing with Obama. You keep saying he's just a man, and 
that Hillary as a woman never had a chance. 

 
There are people who will not vote for a woman as president of the US. No 
matter how hard you try, it will nto happen.  Hillary had negative. Bill had 
alot 
of negative. At the end of the day, Biden was a working class, Catholic 
conservative codewords for safe white male. The same working class Dems that 
would 
never vote for Obam because he is black and vote for Hillary because she was 
white and was conservative. The boys club has only gotten darker. 
 

You find all these examples of how sexism keeps women down.   You diminish 
the accomplishment of a man of color as nothing, as if only a woman president 
would have any meaning.

 
I nevver said what Obama did was nothing.You are greasping for insult. The 
primaries are over. A woman president would have great meaning in this world. 

I know what her problems were. 

 

Yet despite all this, despite the obvious and rampant racism, Obama and his 
wife never made a huge deal of it. Did they discuss it? 

 
Of course they did not make a fuss. It would have looke bad and would not 
have worked in this change theme. 
 
 
 

 
Whatever happened to you in life to make you self-hating, man-bashing, and 
self-pitying, I'm sorry for it. 

Keith
 
I was trying to be nice. You talk to damn much to get your point across. I am 
not bitter nor mean nor man hating  nor vile.  Hillary lost. I will support 
McCain. 
 
These are my people too. I will question some of our beliefs in order to move 
foward. I iwll not tow the line just because non one wants to saks themselves 
these qustions. These are not hard questions. They are just to make us think. 
 
 
 

Hillary got a clue--it's time you did too.  
 
 

Good Night



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Martin
(standing ovation, and awaiting your literary debut)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

--- On Thu, 8/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 1:26 AM












You really, really need to check your facts. Clyburn was on the fence for 
months. Like many blacks in this country (me included) he was leaning toward 
Hillary Clinton. But Obama's success, coupled with the Clinton's increasingly 
hostile and dirty tactics, made him lean toward Obama. I watched Clyburn in a 
live interview say that he called Bill Clinton personally to tell him he was 
going with Obama, and Clinton cussed at him. I heard Richardson say Clinton 
went off on him. Hell, Teddy Kennedy said the Clintons went off on him too. 
John Lewis here in Atlanta called to tell them, and he too said it didn't go 
well. I liked and like Bill and Hillary, but they did this to themselves.  You 
call Clyburn a dog, but it was the Clintons who acted like brutes, cursing and 
threatening and attacking people for having the temerity to back someone else. 
Tonight at the DNC, Clyburn said he liked the Clintons, still likes the 
Clintons. I have no problem with them, he
 said.He then said he
 still felt some of their comments could have been interpreted as racist, but 
that he still had no enduring problem with them.
 
How is that the posture of an angry dog?
 
And I'm really, really confused. What did Obama do to Hillary? How can you in 
the same night attack Obama and men for a sexist plot against Hillary, then say 
she came out swinging and he was meek.   She lost this fight, and you are 
saying you'll never vote for him. You are Black right? Then tell me how a 
respectful Black man like Obama who speaks with nothing but respect for women 
is worse than McCain, who called his wife the c-word in public? Tell me how you 
have contempt for Obama who has an intelligent, educated wife who I believe 
will bring more respect to the First Lady, while going with don't-say-too- much 
Cindy McCain?
 
You're entitled to your opinion, that's the American way. But if I could 
understand it as something other than an odd hatred of Obama, or men, or Black 
men--or all three--that' d be nice. If you think a white multi-millionaire like 
john McCain who supported a senseless invasion that will cost us trillions is 
better for you than a Black man who understands the struggles of being both 
Black and not wealthy, that's your right.  
 
I'm tired, mad at myself for staying up this late and doing this instead of 
writing or job searching. But I say again--and finally--you seem to have a lot 
of hostility. I've read all your posts, and they seem to have a common theme of 
hatred for men, hatred for Black men, and contempt for Black people who dare 
say the world's not fair to them. i just don't get it.
 
 -- Original message  -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



In a message dated 8/27/2008 8:56:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, KeithBJohnson@ 
comcast.net writes:

Maybe, but he never resorted to the nasty, name-calling, baiting, disparaging, 
disrespectful tactics the Clintons did. 
 
No he had his rotweiler Clyburn and other blacks do it. He had those who hated 
Hilary do it. 
 

When Hillary was belittling him as nothing but a one-speech guy, who was 
respectfully disagreeing with her. when she shot nasty and really angry 
comments at him during their debates,
 
Please I watched those debates. She did not let him get away with anything. She 
cam out swinging. He never fought back. He played the meek nice guy care. 
If the moderater talked about his problems, people felt sorry for him. *gag*
 
 

he acted with calm and class and made his point, firmly. And I believe that had 
he lost, he'd have been out there doing his level best to help the Clintons 
win, despite how they treated him. What did Hillary and Bill do at first? Acted 
like poor losers, dropped out of sight, Bill going so far as to leave the 
country rather than be asked to campaign for Obama.
They're getting their stuff together now, but it took a while. I say this as 
someone who liked Hillary long past the point when many men and women hated 
her, who defended many of her deeds as just tough politics, who sat in 
indecision for long moments in the booth here in Atlanta before finally casting 
my vote for Obama. I don't have a problem with her as a woman or anything like 
that. I just have a problem with the way they let their campaign against Obama 
degenerate. They messed up big, and everyone seems to realize that, them 
included.
 
That is why I am voting McCain. There is nothing Hilary can not and say to make 
me vote for that man. She had it in her grasp and she lost it.





It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.


  




 

















  

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread KeithBJohnson
Gymfig,

I must be crazy for continuing this, but I do want to clear up one thing. 
Sayinig you have a problem with men is *not* saying you're lesbian, crazy, or a 
bit***.  It's responses like that that confuse me. I love women, I respect 
women, and I am saddened at the gender battles I see in this country, 
especially with Black people. What I've seen from you is a hair trigger 
whenever men in power comes up, an immediate, loud repudiation of men--or at 
least Black men--out of proportion to what's said. When we discuss Obama, you 
say He's another man, big deal.So what' if he's black? which is disrespectul 
to the *kind* of man he is, and to Black people. You seem to paint all men in 
power with this huge brush of keeping women down, and I have to say I don't get 
it. While I know sexism exists and is rampant--and so is racism--the level of 
anger you display is offputting. Especially,again, toward generalizing people 
like Obama, who--say what you will about his readiness or blackness--shows 
so much respect for women, as do I.

I think that responding to my concerns with your man bashing with an immediate, 
so you're calling me a crazy lesbian bi*** exemplifies an issue you have. 
Having problems with men does not equate to lesbianism, and unlike you, I 
*never* use the b-word, which I find to be derogatory and demeaning.  

I really feel you are bringing some prejudices to these discussions. I've 
looked back over many of my posts, and nothing in them can be interpreted as 
calling you what you said.  Maybe you know a lot of men who seem to think in 
this twisted way, but I'm not one of them.

-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
In a message dated 8/28/2008 12:27:07 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
You really, really need to check your facts. Clyburn was on the fence for 
months. 
Clyburn was not a Clinton supporter. Neither was Pelosi or Brazile. All of this 
fence sitting was a farce.




Like many blacks in this country (me included) he was leaning toward Hillary 
Clinton. But Obama's success, 
with whites 


coupled with the Clinton's increasingly hostile and dirty tactics,

I don't understand why it is so wrong to attafck your opponet. She was his 
rival. What were they supposed to do, have a duel? Jeez Louise. She was a white 
woman attacking a black man. I guess that was the problem. 


made him lean toward Obama. I watched Clyburn in a live interview say that he 
called Bill Clinton personally to tell him he was going with Obama, and Clinton 
cussed at him. I heard Richardson say Clinton went off on him. Hell, Teddy 
Kennedy said the Clintons went off on him too. John Lewis here in Atlanta 
called to tell them, and he too said it didn't go well. I liked and like Bill 
and Hillary, but they did this to themselves.  You call Clyburn a dog, but it 
was the Clintons who acted like brutes, cursing and threatening and attacking 
people for having the temerity to back someone else. Tonight at the DNC, 
Clyburn said he liked the Clintons, still likes the Clintons. I have no 
problem with them, he said.He then said he still felt some of their comments 
could have been interpreted as racist, but that he still had no enduring 
problem with them.

Clybrun warned the Clintons that they should fall in line unless she and her 
supporters were going to lose their seat. 

How is that the posture of an angry dog?

And I'm really, really confused. What did Obama do to Hillary? How can you in 
the same night attack Obama and men for a sexist plot against Hillary, then say 
she came out swinging and he was meek. 

I never said that she was meek. She is a woman. Vilified for be a hard core 
bithc. Something that men don't like. 

 She lost this fight, and you are saying you'll never vote for him. 

No I will not. 

You are Black right?

Yes

Then tell me how a respectful Black man like Obama who speaks with nothing but 
respect for women is worse than McCain, who called his wife the c-word in 
public? 

He said that he did not. 

Tell me how you have contempt for Obama who has an intelligent, educated wife 
who I believe will bring more respect to the First Lady, while going with 
don't-say-too-much Cindy McCain?

I do not vote for first lady. 

You're entitled to your opinion, that's the American way. But if I could 
understand it as something other than an odd hatred of Obama, or men, or Black 
men--
LOL not this ish again. I am not a bitter lesbian. 


or all three--that'd be nice. If you think a white multi-millionaire like john 
McCain who supported a senseless invasion that will cost us trillions is better 
for you than a Black man who understands the struggles of being both Black and 
not wealthy, that's your right.  

That black man has not proven he undestands the sturggle of people. He cars 
about the corporations that put him there. 

I'm tired, mad at myself for staying up this late and doing this instead of 
writing or job searching.

Me too. 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Omari Confer
Tired or not but everything is racist. You cant tell whites to get their act
together if they own the act, the actors and the stage. Its and unfair
battle of perception and we are always on the losing end. John McCain can
give 2 flying cucumbers about the black community. They are not his
contingent...so any comments of the like simply looks like a cheap
swipe...which it would be. I respect McCain and realize many points he makes
and policy ideas are more solid thank my man B. But as they say on the
streets...

DONT GET IT TWISTED!

McCain is thirsty for the seat. I am more concerned more about what he will
let happen and not what he will do. You can complain about Liberals all you
want, but a step in the right direction is something we should applaud. In
the words of the rap group M.O.P

In order to survive the game, know the game...

c w m

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 8/27/2008 7:39:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 That's my thoughts exactly.  What I saw Clintion was in a no-win
 situation.  It has now dawn on her that thanks to her primary actions she
 either has to help Obama win the election-even if it means she'll never have
 a decent shot of running for president.  Or killing her political career,
 and her chance of holding her senate seat by either doing nothing, or
 harming Obama's chance of winning it.  So she had to hit one out of the
 park.  *But now she has to make sure that Obama wins the nod or many will
 blame his loss on her and endure the backlash.  Which will probally end her
 senate career.*


 This is what I am tired of . I am tired of the Everything is racist. Poor
 Obama. I saw him in the debates with Hillary. He was horrible. However black
 peole were crying racism. I saw him at Saddleback. McCain was great. You
 can't blame that on racism. Minoriites have been force feed that nothing is
 there fault. It is all the racist system.

 Now you have all of these so called white liberals who feel proud they are
 not racist like their parents. We can all be stupid toghet. Give me a
 break.

 Take teen pregnacy. It used to be a black problem:. Now it is a white
 problem and is acceptable. You have all of these dolllars going in to stop
 it in the black community. However it is ballooning in the white community.
 When will Obama tell whites to get their act together. He won't .

 He will say that peopel must work together to stop problems. It will be
 accpetable becuse he is a Bill Cosby type of person. John McCain says the
 same thing and he is labeled a racist. This has NOT helped. People need to
 sop looking at race and look at the problem.



 --
 It's only a deal if it's where *you* want to go. Find your travel deal *
 here* http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547.
  




-- 
cwm blog
http://centralheatingblog.blogspot.com
STRING THEORY
http://www.stringtheory.mypodcast.com


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/28/2008 9:57:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Gymfig,
 
I must be crazy for continuing this, but I do want to clear up one thing. 
Sayinig you have a problem with men is *not* saying you're lesbian, crazy, or a 
bit***.  It's responses like that that confuse me. I love women, I respect 
women, and I am saddened at the gender battles I see in this country, 
especially 
with Black people. 

 
 

What I've seen from you is a hair trigger whenever men in power comes up, an 
immediate, loud repudiation of men--or at least Black men--out of proportion 
to what's said. When we discuss Obama, you say He's another man, big deal.So 
what' if he's black? which is disrespectul to the *kind* of man he is, and to 
Black people. 

 
It is not disrespectful at all. People may be happy that he is runnig  for 
president. However at the end of the day he is still human. He is still a 
politician. He needs the same corporate money he says he despsies. He went to 
Wrights chuch becaue it introduced him to the right people.  It iwas not a 
sould seac
hig decision  He did what others have done in the past. He is no different 
than anybody else. 
 
 
 
I don't see him as  great figure in terms of accomplishments. I think Colin 
Powell is a great man.  He is not a celebrity.  There is a huge difference 
between Powell and Obama. I know that they respect one another. I would take 
Powell any day over Obama. 
 
 
Two goverenors of California were actos. They have a built in fan base. 
People complained about Bush and his expereince that was brought by his Daddy. 
Well 
Obam has not even finished his first term. Why should he be seen as different 
than Bush?  
 
Some people say that Clinton should be a supreme corut judge. Shouldn't you 
be a judge before you sit on the bench? Obvisouly that is not the case any 
more. 
 
 
 
He is just a man that gives great speeches. This  election saddens to. It 
shows that the POTUS is just a figurehead. The real power is by lobbyists and 
coporations. They run this country. I am not a fan of Clitnon or McCain in 
terms 
of experiene. I take McCain any day. 
 
Race has nothing to do with my dislike of hom. 
 
 
 
 

You seem to paint all men in power with this huge brush of keeping women 
down, 

You are mistaken
 

II really feel you are bringing some prejudices to these discussions. I've 
looked back over many of my posts, and nothing in them can be interpreted as 
calling you what you said.  Maybe you know a lot of men who seem to think in 
this 
twisted way, but I'm not one of them.

 
As a black woman I see sexism and racism all the time.  My race means that I 
will be lazy. My gender meas that I can not do the work. You are a black man. 
Sure you face problems. You don't have people who say that you have a smaller 
brain and can't handle high pressured situations. Not as a man. You don't have 
the problem of being emotional and seen as a negative. You don't have the 
problem with memebers of your group that don't think that women should NEVER be 
near the top. Any black person that say that blacks should not be leaders is is 
as racist. You don't have the burden of being told to sacrifice  for the sake 
of the race. You don't have to worry if your outward apprearence is more 
important than  your accomplishments. You don't have to worry that if you focus 
on 
your group then that will tear the family structure apart and will destroy 
men. 
 
No I don't hate men I dont hate black men. The fact that you continue with 
this kind of conclusion speaks volumes. This is the kind of sexims I hate. 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread KeithBJohnson
At last,  there is the crux i sought. You ended this polemic with a whole lot 
of you don't understand my pain. Get a clue. I was raised by a Black woman 
who dealt with this. I have two sisters and a whole lot of female friends. I've 
been with my wife for 22 years, and i sure as heck know what she goes through 
as a Black woman. That I don't experience all the issues black *women* have 
doesn't mean I can't relate to struggles as a Black *man*.  Again, you seem to 
create an argument where none exists. Not once, in one single of my posts did I 
deny that women have it hard. I acknowledged that. What I said was taht Black 
people have it hard, women have it hard, both have it hard, so why are some 
women using the gender issue to say they have it harder, to say Barak Obama won 
an unfair contest? That's what Hillary and her people did, that's what you keep 
doing. If the system is sexist, rail against it, but quit punishing that man 
for it, a man who respects women from everything I can se
e. And then, going to McCain? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your 
face. How does putting down a Black man in favor of a white man help your cause 
as a woman? i guess a candidate who calls his wife the c-word (and it was heard 
and confirmed by his own retainers off the record) is better for women's 
advancement than a young Brother who reveres his mother, grandmother, wife, 
sister, and daughters?

I  said, and I repeat this: why did this turn into a men vs. women battle when 
it should have turned into how can we fix all the -ism's discussion. 

You are guilty of the same pity-me attitude you accuse me of. I criticize 
Hillary--a lady I supported at first--because she took real problems and 
reduced them to hammers to use in a win-at-any-cost campaign. She used people 
to cry sexism, she used racism to try to forge ahead. I never denied sexism 
exists, but I decry her saying it's worse than racism, and the way she and her 
sycophants then attacked Obama for it.  You're doing the same thing, and I tell 
you, in me youve really alienated a Black man who gets it far more than you 
might think. 

As a woman you definitely deal with some burdens I don't deal with. As a man, I 
deal with some you don't deal with, such as being seen as a physical threat 
just by hauling my 6' frame onto an elevator with a white woman.  We both 
suffer ,Gymfig. I've watched my wife deal with racist, sexist white guys on her 
job; she's watched me deal with racist people on mine. Never once in two 
decades have we had an argument where she says you don't get my pain, you have 
it easier. She comes to me for advice and support, and vice versa. We help 
each other work through those problems. But rest assured, if either of us 
started directing anger at the other, blaming the other for some perceived 
advantage, it wouldn't be tolerated. I have told her yeah, I can see you have 
battles I don't have as a man. But you know what, it's still *my* battle 
because she's my woman, and my battles are hers because I'm her man. My wife 
doesn't have it harder than me: we as a Black couple have it harder than white
s, and we as Black people have it harder.  As long as people like you attack 
folk like me and Barak and other Black men who are actually trying to make 
things better, you splinter us.

I realize that you don't get me, and I'm really saddened and disgusted that 
it's so easy for a Sister to attack a Brother who's trying to understand 
things. You are the living example of why Black men and women can't get along, 
you're the woman who hits back at a man who's holding his hand out to help, the 
one who says You have it better 'cause you're a man, you don't get my pain. 
You push me away because you want to stay wrapped in a cocoon of self-pity. 
You are a danger to the future of Black men and women finally healing all the 
hurts we've done to each other, but I won't be a party to that foolishness.


Okay, I'm done.



-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
In a message dated 8/28/2008 9:57:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
Gymfig,

I must be crazy for continuing this, but I do want to clear up one thing. 
Sayinig you have a problem with men is *not* saying you're lesbian, crazy, or a 
bit***.  It's responses like that that confuse me. I love women, I respect 
women, and I am saddened at the gender battles I see in this country, 
especially with Black people. 


What I've seen from you is a hair trigger whenever men in power comes up, an 
immediate, loud repudiation of men--or at least Black men--out of proportion to 
what's said. When we discuss Obama, you say He's another man, big deal.So 
what' if he's black? which is disrespectul to the *kind* of man he is, and to 
Black people. 

It is not disrespectful at all. People may be happy that he is runnig  for 
president. However at the end of the day he is still human. He is still a 
politician. He needs the same corporate money 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/28/2008 12:49:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Not once, in one single of my posts did I deny that women have it hard. I 
acknowledged that. What I said was that Black people have it hard, women have 
it 
hard, both have it hard, so why are some women using the gender issue to say 
they have it harder, to say Barack Obama won an unfair contest? That's what 
Hillary and her people did, that's what you keep doing. If the system is 
sexist, 
rail against it, but quit punishing that man for it, a man who respects women 
from everything I can see. 

 
Why does every Hillary supporter have to be anti man? This is something I 
don't get. I don't like Obama. That is why I went to Hillary. Now I have to 
choose between McCain and Obama. I still don't like Obama. That leaves McCain. 
I 
can criticize Obama just like I can criticize McCain. This is the same kind of 
reasoning that was used against Hillary during the primaries. If you don't like 
Obama then you must have issues of race or gender.  You that said I have 
issues. Not me. 
 
 
McCain won Saddleback. All the Obama supporters I know could not spin that. 
They admitted Obama had faults. Obama has a tendency to make a statement. He 
then has to call another news conference to clarify his statement. Just say 
what 
you feel and get over it. McCain is not perfect. I find that annoying. 
Obama's inner circle always seems to keep him protected. They won't let him go 
out 
on his on. 
 
 
 
 

And then, going to McCain? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your 
face. How does putting down a Black man in favor of a white man help your cause 
as a woman? 

 
Putting him down? It is called criticism. Everyone has to go through it. 
 

I guess a candidate who calls his wife the c-word (and it was heard and 
confirmed by his own retainers off the record) is better for women's 
advancement 
than a young Brother who reveres his mother, grandmother, wife, sister, and 
daughters?

 
 
I am worried about his policies not how he treats his family. 

 
I said, and I repeat this: why did this turn into a men vs. women battle when 
it should have turned into how can we fix all the -ism's discussion. 

 
 
Everytime Clinton comes up you have a what' s wrong with Gymfig and black 
people response. 

 
You are guilty of the same pity-me attitude you accuse me of. I criticize 
Hillary--a lady I supported at first--because she took real problems and 
reduced 
them to hammers to use in a win-at-any-cost campaign. She used people to cry 
sexism, she used racism to try to forge ahead. I never denied sexism exists, 
but I decry her saying it's worse than racism, and the way she and her 
sycophants then attacked Obama for it.  You're doing the same thing, and I tell 
you, in 
me you've really alienated a Black man who gets it far more than you might 
think. 

 
 
Okay  

 
As a woman you definitely deal with some burdens I don't deal with. As a man, 
I deal with some you don't deal with, such as being seen as a physical threat 
just by hauling my 6' frame onto an elevator with a white woman.  We both 
suffer,Gymfig. I've watched my wife deal with racist, sexist white guys on her 
job; she's watched me deal with racist people on mine. Never once in two 
decades 
have we had an argument where she says you don't get my pain, you have it 
easier. She comes to me for advice and support, and vice versa. We help each 
other work through those problems. But rest assured, if either of us started 
directing anger at the other, blaming the other for some perceived advantage, 
it 
wouldn't be tolerated. I have told her yeah, I can see you have battles I 
don't have as a man. But you know what, it's still *my* battle because she's 
my 
woman, and my battles are hers because I'm her man. My wife doesn't have it 
harder than me: we as a Black couple have it ha rder than whites, and we as 
Black people have it harder.  As long as people like you attack folk like me 
and 
Barak and other Black men who are actually trying to make things better, you 
splinter us.
 
I realize that you don't get me, and I'm really saddened and disgusted that 
it's so easy for a Sister to attack a Brother who's trying to understand 
things. 

 
So I am supposed to support the brothers no matter what? I don't care about 
color, I care about content. 

You are the living example of why Black men and women can't get along, you're 
the woman who hits back at a man who's holding his hand out to help, the one 
who says You have it better 'cause you're a man, you don't get my pain. You 
push me away because you want to stay wrapped in a cocoon of self-pity. 
You are a danger to the future of Black men and women finally healing all the 
hurts we've done to each other, but I won't be a party to that foolishness.

 
I could care less about black male and female relationships when it comes to 
politics. That Bros. before Hoe does not work. This election is not about 
black people. I am 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-28 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/28/2008 10:04:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Tired or not but everything is racist. You cant tell whites to get their act 
together if they own the act, the actors and the stage. 
 
So what are you going to do? Whites are not going anywhere. Hispanics are the 
majority minority. Republicans 'care about Hispanic issues because Hispanics 
don't always vote Democratic. They know how to make people more for their 
vote. Blacks will always be Democrat according to this line of reason. Both 
parties will stop paying attention to you. Republicans won't waste time. 
Democrats 
will take you for granted. 
 

Its and unfair battle of perception and we are always on the losing end. John 
McCain can give 2 flying cucumbers about the black community. They are not 
his contingent...so any comments of the like simply looks like a cheap 
swipe...which it would be. I respect McCain and realize many points he makes 
and policy 
ideas are more solid thank my man B. But as they say on the streets...

DONT GET IT TWISTED!

McCain is thirsty for the seat. I am more concerned more about what he will 
let happen and not what he will do. 
 
I a concerned about Obama. He wants it too. So did Hillary. You have to what 
something to get it. If not, why run?
 
 
 

You can complain about Liberals all you want, but a step in the right 
direction is something we should applaud. In the words of the rap group 
M.O.P

In order to survive the game, know the game...
 
You can't play the game when you don't play both side. The game gets older 
after a while. 




**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Martin
I admit that I, too, am flabbergasted by this, Keith. Maybe she's picked up 
something along the road in the past few weeks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

--- On Wed, 8/27/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 6:52 PM












Okay, she's gone a long way toward redeeming herself. Hillary 
Clintion--after several states yielded to New York--spoke for her state and the 
convention, asking that Barak Obama be declared the candidate by acclamation, 
which just took place.
 
Good move, good move. Although...I must admit I was enjoying the long, drawn 
out nomination speeches from each state's delegates. Always fun to hear The 
Great State of so-and-so brag about their luminaries, their weather, their 
role in the Revolutionary War, whatever.
 
Now, let's see if Bill can swallow that anger and bring it like his wife did. 
Seeing as Hillary has her eye to the future, you best believe she's told Bill 
not to screw this up for her by giving the slightest reason for people to blame 
them if Obama were to lose. I think Billy Boy will schmooze and dissemble with 
the best of 'em tonight!

  




 

















  

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 6:29:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I admit that I, too, am flabbergasted by this, Keith. Maybe she's picked up 
something along the road in the past few weeks.

It is all for show. She want those keep h Senate seat and move on up. It is 
all politics. The Party does not want to lose all of those angry black voters. 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread KeithBJohnson
yeah, man. I think she--and Bill--picked up that whether Obama wins or loses, 
what they do this year and this week determines their own futures. It's no joke 
that a lot of Blacks (me included) are incensed at the not-so-subtle racism the 
Clintons--who were givent the title of honorary Blacks--used against Obama. 
It's less about even supporting Obama and more about the tricks they used. And 
I've heard a lot of Blacks saying that if she didn't do everythig in her power 
to make up for that, if Obama lost, they'd hold her and Bill responsible. Right 
or wrong, that's the way it is. And as time's gone on, they've realized it's 
not just Blacks, but many younger whites who don't have a sense of history and 
loyalty with the Clintons. If Hillary runs in four years or tries to run in 
even eight years, for newer generations she and Bill will be a part of history. 
And how would they like part of that historic legacy to be that's the lady who 
helped shoot down the first serious Black presidenti
al candidate. and she's old too.



-- Original message -- 
From: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I admit that I, too, am flabbergasted by this, Keith. Maybe she's picked up 
something along the road in the past few weeks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

--- On Wed, 8/27/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 6:52 PM


Okay, she's gone a long way toward redeeming herself. Hillary 
Clintion--after several states yielded to New York--spoke for her state and the 
convention, asking that Barak Obama be declared the candidate by acclamation, 
which just took place.

Good move, good move. Although...I must admit I was enjoying the long, drawn 
out nomination speeches from each state's delegates. Always fun to hear The 
Great State of so-and-so brag about their luminaries, their weather, their 
role in the Revolutionary War, whatever.

Now, let's see if Bill can swallow that anger and bring it like his wife did. 
Seeing as Hillary has her eye to the future, you best believe she's told Bill 
not to screw this up for her by giving the slightest reason for people to blame 
them if Obama were to lose. I think Billy Boy will schmooze and dissemble with 
the best of 'em tonight!


 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread KeithBJohnson
Right on, but such is the nature of politics. If Barak can hold his tongue at 
some of the nastiness and racism she leveled his way--while he never used the 
admittedly existent sexism that exists against her--then it's the least she and 
Bill can do.

-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 6:29:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
I admit that I, too, am flabbergasted by this, Keith. Maybe she's picked up 
something along the road in the past few weeks.

It is all for show. She want those keep h Senate seat and move on up. It is all 
politics. The Party does not want to lose all of those angry black voters. 






It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread GWashin891
That's my thoughts exactly.   What I saw Clintion was in a no-win situation.  
 It has now dawn on her that thanks to her primary actions she either has to 
help Obama win the election-even if it means she'll never have a decent shot 
of running for president.   Or killing her political career, and her chance of 
holding her senate seat by either doing nothing, or harming Obama's chance of 
winning it.   So she had to hit one out of the park.   But now she has to make 
sure that Obama wins the nod or many will blame his loss on her and endure 
the backlash.   Which will probally end her senate career.


-GTW 

In a message dated 8/27/08 7:41:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 In a message dated 8/27/2008 6:29:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I admit that I, too, am flabbergasted by this, Keith. Maybe she's picked up 
 something along the road in the past few weeks.
 
 It is all for show. She want those keep h Senate seat and move on up. It is 
 all politics. The Party does not want to lose all of those angry black 
 voters.
 
 




**
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.
  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/27/2008 7:22:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

. If Barak can hold his tongue at some of the nastiness and racism she 
leveled his way--
 
That is how he got the nomination. 
 
 

while he never used the admittedly existent sexism that exists against 
her--then it's the least she and Bill can do.




**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 7:21:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

used against Obama. It's less about even supporting Obama and more about the 
tricks they used. And I've heard a lot of Blacks saying that if she didn't do 
everythig in her power to make up for that, if Obama lost, they'd hold her and 
Bill responsible. Right or wrong, that's the way it is. And as time's gone 
on, they've realized it's not just Blacks, but many younger whites who don't 
have a sense of history and loyalty with the Clintons. If Hillary runs in four 
years or tries to run in even eight years, for newer generations she and Bill 
will be a part of history. And how would they like part of that historic legacy 
to be that's the lady who helped shoot down the first serious Black presi 
dential candidate. and she's old too.

All those whites who toke african american studies course and have half black 
kids always get offended and act as if they understand. 
 
At the end of the day, being the first black means nothing to me. It is all 
liberal potlics that seems to end up hurtig blacks in the end. 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/27/2008 7:39:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

That's my thoughts exactly.  What I saw Clintion was in a no-win situation.  
It has now dawn on her that thanks to her primary actions she either has to 
help Obama win the election-even if it means she'll never have a decent shot of 
running for president.  Or killing her political career, and her chance of 
holding her senate seat by either doing nothing, or harming Obama's chance of 
winning it.  So she had to hit one out of the park.  But now she has to make 
sure 
that Obama wins the nod or many will blame his loss on her and endure the 
backlash.  Which will probally end her senate career.
 
This is what I am tired of . I am tired of the Everything is racist. Poor 
Obama. I saw him in the debates with Hillary. He was horrible. However black 
peole were crying racism. I saw him at Saddleback. McCain was great. You can't 
blame that on racism. Minoriites have been force feed that nothing is there 
fault. It is all the racist system.  
 
Now you have all of these so called white liberals who feel proud they are 
not racist like their parents. We can all be stupid toghet. Give me a break.  
 
Take teen pregnacy. It used to be a black problem:. Now it is a white 
problem and is acceptable. You have all of these dolllars going in to stop it 
in the 
black community. However it is ballooning in the white community. When will 
Obama tell whites to get their act together. He won't . 
 
He will say that peopel must work together to stop problems. It will be 
accpetable becuse he is a Bill Cosby type of person. John McCain says the same 
thing and he is labeled a racist. This has NOT helped. People need to sop 
looking 
at race and look at the problem. 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread KeithBJohnson
Yep. And listening to her speech last night, and Bill's speech tonight, and 
watching the amazing fervor and charisma all of the primaries bring--Michell, 
Hillary, Bill--makes me a bit sad.  It makes me wish it *could* have been 
possible for the Clintons and Obamas to run together on the same ticket. What a 
power, what a force they could have been. But, despite what they're doing now, 
Bill and Hillary have shown that they're too prideful and self-absorbed to ever 
be second fiddle.

-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
That's my thoughts exactly.  What I saw Clintion was in a no-win situation.  It 
has now dawn on her that thanks to her primary actions she either has to help 
Obama win the election-even if it means she'll never have a decent shot of 
running for president.  Or killing her political career, and her chance of 
holding her senate seat by either doing nothing, or harming Obama's chance of 
winning it.  So she had to hit one out of the park.  But now she has to make 
sure that Obama wins the nod or many will blame his loss on her and endure the 
backlash.  Which will probally end her senate career.


-GTW 

In a message dated 8/27/08 7:41:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



In a message dated 8/27/2008 6:29:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:

I admit that I, too, am flabbergasted by this, Keith. Maybe she's picked up 
something along the road in the past few weeks.

It is all for show. She want those keep h Senate seat and move on up. It is all 
politics. The Party does not want to lose all of those angry black voters.






**
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547) 
 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 8:29:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But, despite what they're doing now, Bill and Hillary have shown that they're 
too prideful and self-absorbed to ever be second fiddle.

Obama said the same thing 
 
 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread KeithBJohnson
Well, you're entitled to that opinion for sure. Speaking as a liberal, I'm 
heartened by a return to more liberal thinking. If it means we can look at 
people as people, instead of using sexual orientation and ethnicity as scare 
tactics, I'm all for it. If we can respect anyone whether they're Christian, 
Muslim, Jew, or atheist, then color me liberal. If we can return to a world 
where we talk with other nations and make decisions with them rather than try 
to push them around, then sign me up. If we can use thoughtful consideration 
rather than charging in with guns blazing, then sing hallelujah. If we can 
bring back to reality the moral Judeo-Christian points conservatives noise 
about, but then ignore--the rights to privacy, respect of all races and 
religions, loving and helping the less fortunate--then by all means, liberalism 
come back!

And I get that just throwing a Black face in office isn't in and of itself 
enough. After all, two of the worst, most destructive people in recent 
history--Clarence Thomas and Condie Rice-are Black. But symbols are 
powerful.Taking a step is powerful. Opening a door is powerful. And putting a 
man --or woman, someday--of color in the highest office in the land is a 
powerful symbol. It will change us in ways we don't even comprehend right now. 
It won't be the Second Coming, but it will move us forward as a nation, a 
people, if only a little bit.  Just as you and I benefited from our parents and 
grandparents being the first on a job, the first in a neighborhood, the first 
in a church, the first to vote, then we'll all benefit from the right man being 
the first to take the leadership of this country.

In my humble opinion.

-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 7:21:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
used against Obama. It's less about even supporting Obama and more about the 
tricks they used. And I've heard a lot of Blacks saying that if she didn't do 
everythig in her power to make up for that, if Obama lost, they'd hold her and 
Bill responsible. Right or wrong, that's the way it is. And as time's gone on, 
they've realized it's not just Blacks, but many younger whites who don't have a 
sense of history and loyalty with the Clintons. If Hillary runs in four years 
or tries to run in even eight years, for newer generations she and Bill will be 
a part of history. And how would they like part of that historic legacy to be 
that's the lady who helped shoot down the first serious Black presi dential 
candidate. and she's old too.
All those whites who toke african american studies course and have half black 
kids always get offended and act as if they understand. 

At the end of the day, being the first black means nothing to me. It is all 
liberal potlics that seems to end up hurtig blacks in the end. 






It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread KeithBJohnson
Maybe, but he never resorted to the nasty, name-calling, baiting, disparaging, 
disrespectful tactics the Clintons did. When Hillary was belittling him as 
nothing but a one-speech guy, who was respectfully disagreeing with her. when 
she shot nasty and really angry comments at him during their debates, he acted 
with calm and class and made his point, firmly. And I believe that had he lost, 
he'd have been out there doing his level best to help the Clintons win, despite 
how they treated him. What did Hillary and Bill do at first? Acted like poor 
losers, dropped out of sight, Bill going so far as to leave the country rather 
than be asked to campaign for Obama.
They're getting their stuff together now, but it took a while. I say this as 
someone who liked Hillary long past the point when many men and women hated 
her, who defended many of her deeds as just tough politics, who sat in 
indecision for long moments in the booth here in Atlanta before finally casting 
my vote for Obama. I don't have a problem with her as a woman or anything like 
that. I just have a problem with the way they let their campaign against Obama 
degenerate. They messed up big, and everyone seems to realize that, them 
included.

-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 8:29:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
But, despite what they're doing now, Bill and Hillary have shown that they're 
too prideful and self-absorbed to ever be second fiddle.
Obama said the same thing 








It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread KeithBJohnson
You're missing a huge thing here. It was Hillary who said on the record that 
she was the candidate of the hardworking, blue collar, Midwestern folks, who 
everyone--everyone--knew to be white voters. It was Bill who reached back and 
said Well you know, Jesse Jackson won South Carolina too, and opened that 
door of not-so-subtle racism. And I have to say, I don't see anyone teaching 
Blacks that all our problems are due to racism, that we don't have to have 
responsibility for ourselves. I'm successful by most standards, I've worked 
hard to get where I am, my parents taught me to fight and scrap and improve 
myself. But they also taught me that racism is real, and to fight it when I see 
it. And it *does* still exist in this country.  Just as Blacks can't spend all 
time blaming racism, we'd be incautious to pretend it doesn't exist.

As for Obama going after whites and telling them to get their act together, i 
can't really speak to that yet. I know he's angered many by his lecturing Black 
men to get it together, by not addressing racism overtly (something which has 
apparently alienated Tavis Smiley). I'm not yet sure where I stand on this. I 
know that he can't obtain the White House speaking the way you and I do. It 
sucks, but if this stupid nation is still questioning Michelle because she made 
the completely understandable statement that she was really proud of America, 
if they deem not wearing a flag pin a sign of treason, then I think they'd 
never put a Black man in office who tells it fully like it is. It makes me 
somewhat ill to even say this, but he does have to walk a fine line here. Has 
he gone too far? I don't know, not sure, but I'm willing to give him a chance. 
I'd rather have a careful Black man like Obama who at least *acknowledges* that 
America is racist, than a sellout like Clarence Thomas who pr
etends it isn't, or a clueless codger like McCain who has about as much in 
common with me and my life as I do with a ant.

-- Original message -- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
In a message dated 8/27/2008 7:39:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
That's my thoughts exactly.  What I saw Clintion was in a no-win situation.  It 
has now dawn on her that thanks to her primary actions she either has to help 
Obama win the election-even if it means she'll never have a decent shot of 
running for president.  Or killing her political career, and her chance of 
holding her senate seat by either doing nothing, or harming Obama's chance of 
winning it.  So she had to hit one out of the park.  But now she has to make 
sure that Obama wins the nod or many will blame his loss on her and endure the 
backlash.  Which will probally end her senate career.

This is what I am tired of . I am tired of the Everything is racist. Poor 
Obama. I saw him in the debates with Hillary. He was horrible. However black 
peole were crying racism. I saw him at Saddleback. McCain was great. You can't 
blame that on racism. Minoriites have been force feed that nothing is there 
fault. It is all the racist system.  

Now you have all of these so called white liberals who feel proud they are not 
racist like their parents. We can all be stupid toghet. Give me a break.  

Take teen pregnacy. It used to be a black problem:. Now it is a white problem 
and is acceptable. You have all of these dolllars going in to stop it in the 
black community. However it is ballooning in the white community. When will 
Obama tell whites to get their act together. He won't . 

He will say that peopel must work together to stop problems. It will be 
accpetable becuse he is a Bill Cosby type of person. John McCain says the same 
thing and he is labeled a racist. This has NOT helped. People need to sop 
looking at race and look at the problem. 






It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/27/2008 8:40:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Well, you're entitled to that opinion for sure. Speaking as a liberal, I'm 
heartened by a return to more liberal thinking. If it means we can look at 
people as people, instead of using sexual orientation and ethnicity as scare 
tactics, I'm all for it. If we can respect anyone whether they're Christian, 
Muslim, 
Jew, or atheist, then color me liberal. If we can return to a world where we 
talk with other nations and make decisions with them rather than try to push 
them around, then sign me up. 
And I get that just throwing a Black face in office isn't in and of itself 
enough. After all, two of the worst, most destructive people in recent 
history--Clarence Thomas and Condie Rice-are Black. But symbols are 
powerful.Taking a 
step is powerful. Opening a door is powerful. And putting a man --or woman, 
someday--of color in the highest office in the land is a powerful symbol. It 
will 
change us in ways we don't even comprehend right now.

 
 
 

It won't be the Second Coming, but it will move us forward as a nation, a 
people, if only a little bit.  Just as you and I benefited from our parents and 
grandparents being the first on a job, the first in a neighborhood, the first 
in a church, the first to vote, then we'll all benefit from the right man being 
the first to take the leadership of this country.
 
In my humble opinion.

Keith, 
Notihing is ever humble with you. I live in a traditional blue state. However 
they baneed gay marriege. Tehre are alot of blue states out there that don't 
like gay marriage. You live in a Hollywood world. A word were it is black or 
white. Either or. If you are against this, then you are racist. If you are for 
this, then you are okay. 
 
I am against illegal immigration. I am against having more Asians come over 
here. I think that a lack of rules is the problem in our society. Howeve I am 
not an Evangelical Christian. I despise them by the way. I am not to found of 
Christianity but I don't believe it should be vilified while other religons are 
celebrated. I don't think that IR are well help race relations. Actually I am 
not worried about race relations. I am worried about myself. I think that 
blaks spend way to much time worried about race and not about themselves as 
individuals. I think tthat they are too scared to be individuals. 
 
This country is not ready for a woman president.  As long as this country 
focuses on race, a woman president will not happen.  Therefore it will not 
happen. Unless the woman is non white or married to a non whte man. 
 
Bros before Hoes
Mammy
Nutcracker
Bitch
White Bitch
 
 
These are terms that are acceptable acros racial and gender lines. It will 
not change with Obama. 
 
This country is moving forwad. However groups have to face responsibility. 
They chose not too because the media says it is not their fault. Slavery is the 
problem. Immigration. Racist white men are al the problem. Government programs 
are the solution. How can you be a progressive when you are told that nothing 
is ever your fault. You don't have to take the blame. 
 
 
The meida vilifies any person of color who does not fall into the victim hood 
category especially african americans. Obama is an excpetion. He is not a 
typical black person. He works hard. He is an immigrant. He does not have the 
stain of slavery. How can you be proud of that? 
 
 
Blacks have allowed liberals to feed them self doubt for too long. Yes Obama 
is exceptional. However why has it take us so long to believe it. That was not 
Bush, it was ourselves. 
 



**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Wow--Hillary Moves for Barak by Acclamation

2008-08-27 Thread Gymfig
In a message dated 8/27/2008 8:50:54 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

You're missing a huge thing here. It was Hillary who said on the record that 
she was the candidate of the hardworking, blue collar, Midwestern folks, who 
everyone--everyone--knew to be white voters.

So if Obama tsaid that he was getting the liberal white and black votes would 
you have been happy. 
 
 
 
 

It was Bill who reached back and said Well you know, Jesse Jackson won South 
Carolina too,

 
It was true. Obama won in a place with alot of blacks. 
 
 
 

and opened that door of not-so-subtle racism. And I have to say, I don't see 
anyone teaching Blacks that all our problems are due to racism, that we don't 
have to have responsibility for ourselves. 

Everything seems to be due to racism on this list. Watch tv and movies. Read 
book after book after book about the effects of slaver. 
 

I'm successful by most standards, I've worked hard to get where I am, my 
parents taught me to fight and scrap and improve myself. But they also taught 
me 
that racism is real, and to fight it when I see it. And it *does* still exist 
in this country.  Just as Blacks can't spend all time blaming racism, we'd be 
incautious to pretend it doesn't exist.

 
 
True 

 
As for Obama going after whites and telling them to get their act together, i 
can't really speak to that yet. I know he's angered many by his lecturing 
Black men to get it together,

 
He should have gone after black women. Because it takes two make a baby and 
birth control is an option. He would have upset whtie women. The black man jab 
was to make sure that white men would vote for him. 
 

by not addressing racism overtly (something which has apparently alienated 
Tavis Smiley). I'm not yet sure where I stand on this. I know that he can't 
obtain the White House speaking the way you and I do. It sucks, but if this 
stupid 
nation is still questioning Michelle because she made the completely 
understandable statement that she was really proud of America, if they deem not 
wearing a flag pin a sign of treason, then I think they'd never put a Black man 
in 
office who tells it fully like it is. It makes me somewhat ill to even say 
this, but he does have to walk a fine line here. Has he gone too far? 

He needs to convince whites. That is why he picked a WHITE MALE in Biden. He 
needs to reassure white America where he stand.s He has the black vote lockeed 
up. Look at the way AA treated that woman on CNN last night. Again with the 
mammy images. 
 
 

I don't know, not sure, but I'm willing to give him a chance. I'd rather have 
a careful Black man like Obama who at least *acknowledges* that America is 
racist, than a sellout like Clarence Thomas w ho pretends it isn't, or a 
clueless codger like McCain who has about as much in common with me and my life 
as I 
do with a ant.

 
 
 




**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.  
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv000547)