time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread J.Tallman



Hello All,

I have been working on a vertical sundial and I have a question.

This South facingvertical has two time scales on it, one at the top 
that shows thehour numbers to use during the period of the year when 
Standard time is in effect, and one at the bottom to show the hour numbers to 
use during the Summer when Daylight Saving time is in effect. The 
hourlines will include the appropriatelongitude correction for the 
site. There is also a completeEoT chart located right under the 
shadowfield on the face of the dialplate. 

My question is whether or not it would beacceptable to 
actuallylabel each scale "Standard Time" or "Daylight Saving Time"so 
that casualobservers wouldbe able to tellwhich one to use for 
the appropriate time of the year. My understanding is that there are 
threethings to consider when designing a dial that will indicate 
StandardTime: solar time at the reference meridian, longitude correction, 
and EoT. Since all three of these things will be dealt with on the dial 
face, would it be appropriate to label the time scales? 

One of my good sundial friends has commented that technicallythe 
scales do not really indicate true Standard Time/DST because the EoT is not 
actually computed into the hourlines. I would be interested to hear what 
the consensus is regarding this issue, because I want to do the right 
thing. If theseexact titles are objectionable does anyone have any 
ideas what I might use for alternative labels? Iam trying to make a 
dial that is easyfor"regular people" tounderstand and use, and 
I think some kind of label along the time scales would be helpful to casual 
observers.

Regards,

Jim Tallman
Sr. Designer
FX Studios
513.829.1888



Re: Shortest day and latest sunrise

2002-07-18 Thread Anselmo P�rez Serrada



Regarding the attempt to learn why the latest sunrise and sunsets don't fall 
on the solstices, I think analemma.com has a pretty good explanation.  I 
suppose some background info and lingo is necessary to understand any 
subject, and that site does a good job of giving the background for the 
beginners. 
-


 


Yes, it's really fantastic!



-


Re: Keeping it simple

2002-07-18 Thread Anselmo P�rez Serrada




I believe that the simplified explanation of these concepts is very 
important.  Complex scientific overloading, however accurate, can 
easily intimidate the casual user of one of our creations, to the 
point of actually making them give up or lose interest in 
understanding the concept at all.  Not everyone, obviously, is looking 
for that level of information.  An elegant, simple explanation for 
some of these basic concepts - the ones they must confront in order to 
understand and use the dial they are standing in front of - is what is 
needed to welcome the uninitiated to the concept, and for that matter, 
to dialing as a whole.


I too am trying to figure out how to explain these things, and I hope 
that by doing so I might even increase our ranks by sparing my 
customers the initial intimidation of the subject matter.  If the 
mountain does not look too steep more people may be inclined to climb 
it, so to speak.  I wonder what the party definitions would be to 
some of these basic dialling concepts, such as EoT?




Jim,

I agree 150% with you!  It is very important not to make things more 
complicate than they are... Sometimes it is the lingo, some others  the 
tools (mathematical,
theoretical, academical) we use to describe them and some others our own 
limitations to express them... And unfortunately many people gets 
discouraged from
knowing more about someting beautiful, useful or simply' mind-expanding' 
(so as to call it) because of this.


As an accidental teacher, I tend to think a lot about which are the 
foundations, the barebones, of what I am going to teach: which is the 
core and which is just
chatter. And I can't help thinking that maybe it is our fault that most 
people are so'scientifically and technically illiterate'... even my own 
engeneering colleagues!


Best regards,

Anselmo





-


Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread john . davis

Hi Jim,

Although it would be technically incorect to use the terms Standard Time and 
Daylight Saving Time for these scales, I for one would not object as it does 
convey the meanings to th general public.  And it does serve as a 
conversation-starter for us pedantic diallists ;-).

If you wanted to avoid these terms with their precise definitions, then you 
could use Summer Time and Winter Time as approximations.  I once used the 
term Greenwich Time (rather than Greenwich Mean Time) for a horizontal dial 
which included the longitude correction and had the EoT as a graph.

Let us know what you finally opt for, please!

Regards,

John





Dr J R Davis
Flowton Dials
N52d 08m: E1d 05m
-


Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread sundials



Hello Jim,

To differentiate between the two scales perhaps you could use 
roman numerals for one and arabic for the other. Also, may I suggest that 
instead of putting them one above the other that you put one "inside" the other 
so that they appear to be side by side. Perhaps you could separate them by 
a continuous double line?

As John has said, I don't think it matters whether you call 
them summer time or DST etc. but you would need an EoT curve either on the dial 
plate or, more conveniently, on a small plate at head height.

Regards,

Silas Higgon (Connoisseur Sun Dials)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  J.Tallman 
  To: Sundial List 
  Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:56 
  PM
  Subject: time scale labels
  
  Hello All,
  
  I have been working on a vertical sundial and I have a question.
  
  This South facingvertical has two time scales on it, one at the top 
  that shows thehour numbers to use during the period of the year when 
  Standard time is in effect, and one at the bottom to show the hour numbers to 
  use during the Summer when Daylight Saving time is in effect. The 
  hourlines will include the appropriatelongitude correction for the 
  site. There is also a completeEoT chart located right under the 
  shadowfield on the face of the dialplate. 
  
  My question is whether or not it would beacceptable to 
  actuallylabel each scale "Standard Time" or "Daylight Saving 
  Time"so that casualobservers wouldbe able to tellwhich 
  one to use for the appropriate time of the year. My understanding is 
  that there are threethings to consider when designing a dial that will 
  indicate StandardTime: solar time at the reference meridian, longitude 
  correction, and EoT. Since all three of these things will be dealt with 
  on the dial face, would it be appropriate to label the time scales? 
  
  
  One of my good sundial friends has commented that technicallythe 
  scales do not really indicate true Standard Time/DST because the EoT is not 
  actually computed into the hourlines. I would be interested to hear what 
  the consensus is regarding this issue, because I want to do the right 
  thing. If theseexact titles are objectionable does anyone have any 
  ideas what I might use for alternative labels? Iam trying to make 
  a dial that is easyfor"regular people" tounderstand and use, 
  and I think some kind of label along the time scales would be helpful to 
  casual observers.
  
  Regards,
  
  Jim Tallman
  Sr. Designer
  FX Studios
  513.829.1888



Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread BillGottesman

In a message dated 7/18/2002 11:21:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I am trying to make a dial that is easy for regular people to understand 
 and use, and I think some kind of label along the time scales would be 
 helpful to casual observers.

Good luck.  I have not found the ideal solution either for this particular 
situation.  Perhaps labling the scales Approximate Standard Time, or 
Uncorrected Standard Time, and the same for DST.  This may encourage your 
readers to use the EOT chart.  I wish I had a better suggestion.

I like John Davis' suggestion of Winter Time and Summer Time.


Bill Gottesman
Burlington, VT
44.4674N, 73.2027W
-


Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread Donald L. Snyder



Due to horizon clutter,I am constrained to 
asouth-facing dial that can only display times near noon, so I made a 
meridian dial with a discontinuous analemma to account fortransitions 
between CDT and CST. It's at http://www.stlwoodworkersguild.org/gallery/snyder_sundial.jpg

 
Don Snyder
 
38.6N, 90.3W


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  sundials 
  
  To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:30 
  PM
  Subject: Re: time scale labels
  
  Hello Jim,
  
  To differentiate between the two scales perhaps you could 
  use roman numerals for one and arabic for the other. Also, may I suggest 
  that instead of putting them one above the other that you put one "inside" the 
  other so that they appear to be side by side. Perhaps you could separate 
  them by a continuous double line?
  
  As John has said, I don't think it matters whether you call 
  them summer time or DST etc. but you would need an EoT curve either on the 
  dial plate or, more conveniently, on a small plate at head 
height.
  
  Regards,
  
  Silas Higgon (Connoisseur Sun Dials)
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
J.Tallman 
To: Sundial List 
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:56 
PM
Subject: time scale labels

Hello All,

I have been working on a vertical sundial and I have a question.

This South facingvertical has two time scales on it, one at the 
top that shows thehour numbers to use during the period of the year 
when Standard time is in effect, and one at the bottom to show the hour 
numbers to use during the Summer when Daylight Saving time is in 
effect. The hourlines will include the appropriatelongitude 
correction for the site. There is also a completeEoT chart 
located right under the shadowfield on the face of the dialplate. 


My question is whether or not it would beacceptable to 
actuallylabel each scale "Standard Time" or "Daylight Saving 
Time"so that casualobservers wouldbe able to 
tellwhich one to use for the appropriate time of the year. My 
understanding is that there are threethings to consider when designing 
a dial that will indicate StandardTime: solar time at the reference 
meridian, longitude correction, and EoT. Since all three of these 
things will be dealt with on the dial face, would it be appropriate to label 
the time scales? 

One of my good sundial friends has commented that technicallythe 
scales do not really indicate true Standard Time/DST because the EoT is not 
actually computed into the hourlines. I would be interested to hear 
what the consensus is regarding this issue, because I want to do the right 
thing. If theseexact titles are objectionable does anyone have 
any ideas what I might use for alternative labels? Iam trying to 
make a dial that is easyfor"regular people" tounderstand 
and use, and I think some kind of label along the time scales would be 
helpful to casual observers.

Regards,

Jim Tallman
Sr. Designer
FX Studios
513.829.1888



time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread Patrick Powers

Message text written by INTERNET:sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de

My question is whether or not it would be acceptable to actually label
each scale Standard Time or Daylight Saving Time

You can do whatever you like - you are the designer! If nothing else you
will generate a discussion between other 'anoraks' like the rest of us!  

However, if you worry about the 'purity' aspect and since you have already
corrected for longitude, you could use the phrases  'Standard Solar Time'
and 'Daylight Saving Solar Time'.  Then mark your EoT graph as providing
the correction from 'Solar Time' to 'Mean Time'.

Hope this helps

Patrick



-
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Patrick_Powers/
Lat: N  51d. 49m. 09s:  Long: W 00d. 21m. 53s

-


Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread Willy Leenders




A sundial has to indicate local time, the solar time or natural time.
People that like to know the official time has to look on a watch.
That is all you have to explain to 'regular people'. They will understand
it.
Willy Leenders
Flanders in Belgium


"J.Tallman" wrote:

Hello All,I have been working
on a vertical sundial and I have a question.This South facing vertical
has two time scales on it, one at the top that shows the hour numbers to
use during the period of the year when Standard time is in effect, and
one at the bottom to show the hour numbers to use during the Summer when
Daylight Saving time is in effect. The hourlines will include the
appropriate longitude correction for the site. There is also a complete
EoT chart located right under the shadowfield on the face of the dialplate.My
question is whether or not it would be acceptable to actually label each
scale "Standard Time" or "Daylight Saving Time" so that casual observers
would be able to tell which one to use for the appropriate time of the
year. My understanding is that there are three things to consider
when designing a dial that will indicate Standard Time: solar time at the
reference meridian, longitude correction, and EoT. Since all three
of these things will be dealt with on the dial face, would it be appropriate
to label the time scales?One of my good sundial friends has commented
that technically the scales do not really indicate true Standard Time/DST
because the EoT is not actually computed into the hourlines. I would
be interested to hear what the consensus is regarding this issue, because
I want to do the right thing. If these exact titles are objectionable
does anyone have any ideas what I might use for alternative labels?
I am trying to make a dial that is easy for "regular people" to understand
and use, and I think some kind of label along the time scales would be
helpful to casual observers.Regards,Jim TallmanSr. DesignerFX
Studios513.829.1888






Re: Keeping it simple

2002-07-18 Thread John Carmichael


To avoid confusing my clients, I just tell them that these irregularities
are due to the earth's tilt and elipital orbit and leave it at that. And
this satisfies them. (As soon as I mention the word orbit they know it's a
complcated subject and never press me for more information).

John

John L. Carmichael Jr.
Sundial Sculptures
925 E. Foothills Dr.
Tucson Arizona 85718
USA

Tel: 520-696-1709
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.sundialsculptures.com
- Original Message -
From: Anselmo Pérez Serrada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Keeping it simple


 
 
  I believe that the simplified explanation of these concepts is very
  important.  Complex scientific overloading, however accurate, can
  easily intimidate the casual user of one of our creations, to the
  point of actually making them give up or lose interest in
  understanding the concept at all.  Not everyone, obviously, is looking
  for that level of information.  An elegant, simple explanation for
  some of these basic concepts - the ones they must confront in order to
  understand and use the dial they are standing in front of - is what is
  needed to welcome the uninitiated to the concept, and for that matter,
  to dialing as a whole.
 
  I too am trying to figure out how to explain these things, and I hope
  that by doing so I might even increase our ranks by sparing my
  customers the initial intimidation of the subject matter.  If the
  mountain does not look too steep more people may be inclined to climb
  it, so to speak.  I wonder what the party definitions would be to
  some of these basic dialling concepts, such as EoT?
 

 Jim,

 I agree 150% with you!  It is very important not to make things more
 complicate than they are... Sometimes it is the lingo, some others  the
 tools (mathematical,
 theoretical, academical) we use to describe them and some others our own
 limitations to express them... And unfortunately many people gets
 discouraged from
 knowing more about someting beautiful, useful or simply' mind-expanding'
 (so as to call it) because of this.

 As an accidental teacher, I tend to think a lot about which are the
 foundations, the barebones, of what I am going to teach: which is the
 core and which is just
 chatter. And I can't help thinking that maybe it is our fault that most
 people are so'scientifically and technically illiterate'... even my own
 engeneering colleagues!

 Best regards,

 Anselmo





 -


-


Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread John Carmichael

Mac and I have been using the term Zonal Time to describe solar time
corrected for longitude.

John

John L. Carmichael Jr.
Sundial Sculptures
925 E. Foothills Dr.
Tucson Arizona 85718
USA

Tel: 520-696-1709
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.sundialsculptures.com
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: time scale labels


 Message text written by INTERNET:sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de

 My question is whether or not it would be acceptable to actually label
 each scale Standard Time or Daylight Saving Time

 You can do whatever you like - you are the designer! If nothing else you
 will generate a discussion between other 'anoraks' like the rest of us!

 However, if you worry about the 'purity' aspect and since you have already
 corrected for longitude, you could use the phrases  'Standard Solar Time'
 and 'Daylight Saving Solar Time'.  Then mark your EoT graph as providing
 the correction from 'Solar Time' to 'Mean Time'.

 Hope this helps

 Patrick



 -
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Patrick_Powers/
 Lat: N  51d. 49m. 09s:  Long: W 00d. 21m. 53s

 -


-


Re: time scale labels

2002-07-18 Thread Peter Mayer



My question is whether or not it would be acceptable to 
actually label each scale Standard Time or Daylight Saving 
Time so that casual observers would be able to tell which one to 
use for the appropriate time of the year.



	My 'tuppence' worth, which doesn't precisely meet Jim's need, 
is a 'Lelievre Dial' which I made last year.  I modified Steve's 
brilliant DeltaCad code to add a 'Standard Time' scale on the inner 
edge and a 'Daylight Savings Time' on the outer. For simplicity's 
sake, all numbers were Roman.  Because the Lelievre dial incorporates 
both the EoT and Longitude correction into the dial face, the labels 
in this case are correct.  (I can send a .pdf (c. 300k) of the dial 
to anyone who's interested).


Peter

--
--
Peter Mayer | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Politics Department |
University of Adelaide  | 'phone:+61.8 8303 5606/5610
Adelaide, SA 5005   | FAX: (+61.8) 8303 3446
AUSTRALIA   |
--
-


Fw: FinePrint Software Newsletter

2002-07-18 Thread John Carmichael

Hello All

Many of us communcate with each other using the wonderful PDF format for all
our documents. My clients love it because it is easily opened with Adobe
Acrobat Reader. But many people complain that they don't know how to make
them.

I use this inexpensive easy-to-use program available at www.fineprint.com

They just sent me their newsletter which you will find helpful if you need a
PDF writing program. (see below)

John

John L. Carmichael Jr.
Sundial Sculptures
925 E. Foothills Dr.
Tucson Arizona 85718
USA

Tel: 520-696-1709
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.sundialsculptures.com

- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Weiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fineprint-announce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: FinePrint Software Newsletter


 --
 FinePrint Announcement
 Hello FinePrint and pdfFactory users,

 Our last email to you was in December, 2001 when we released pdfFactory
 Pro.  Since then, we have been hard at work refining both pdfFactory and
 FinePrint.

 pdfFactory Pro has a new bookmark feature which we are very excited
 about.  The bookmark feature utilizes the bookmark pane in Adobe Acrobat
 Reader to make navigating documents easier.  pdfFactory Pro has three
 bookmarks modes:

 1.  table of contents mode - uses bookmarks to allow creation of complex
 tables of contents based on the text sytles used in a document.  This
 feature is similar the table of contents feature found in Microsoft
 Word.  pdfFactory Pro can generate a table of contents for ANY document
 based on the text styles within it.

 2.  job mode - adds a bookmark for each print job in the PDF.  This
 allows PDFs to be used as navigable generic document containers, similar
 in size and function to a ZIP file.

 3.  manual mode - allows bookmarks to be manually created by selecting
 the page to be bookmarked in the pdfFactory preview.

 With FinePrint, we have been working on improved reliability with
 applications and with all of the various Windows platforms.  Among the
 recent improvements in FinePrint are:

 - better bitmap imaging
 - improved terminal server/citrix support
 - support for hardware copies on printers that support it
 - better support for Postscript printers

 Look for a major upgrade to FinePrint later this year!

 Registered users of FinePrint and pdfFactory may use the latest releases
 for FREE.
 You may download the latest releases at www.fineprint.com.  Just install
 over your current version and your registration will remain intact.  If
 you are using the Enterprise versions and want to download, click the
 Product link and then Enterprise Edition link.

 If you are registered user of the standard pdfFactory (not Pro), you can
 upgrade to pdfFactory Pro for $50.  pdfFactory Pro contains the bookmark
 feature mentioned above as well as full security options and live URLs.
 Information about upgrading can be found here:

 http://www.fineprint.com/support/upgrade.html

 As always, we appreciate your continued support of our products.  We
 value your comments so please send them to us.

 Jonathan Weiner
 Mark O'Brien

 FinePrint Software
 
 To unsubscribe from the mailing list:
 Send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
 account you want to remove from the list.

 You will receive an email confirming your action from the FinePrint
 email list server.





 -
 To unsubscribe send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-