[freenet-support] Weekend releases!?
Hello Toad! I think that it is a very bad Idea to publish a new official build, when in one day or two you will go to weekend, especially if it is a stable build! When there is a serious bug, it will take much longer to solve the problem. And the network can rather go broken, like -- I think -- it happens now! The longer my node runs, the more RNFs I get. Im using the 8086 build. Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 54 (13/41/150) before update(8085/8086) I usually had a value about 140 http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/version_data.txt # Histogram of node versions in fred's Routing table # 25.07.2004 19:18:20 # nodes: 291 Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5084 135 Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5085 82 Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5086 74 When you think that you are ready to publish a new build, it is Thursday, Friday or Saturday and you know that you want to have some free days, without development/support, maybe it will by better to wait until it is Monday to publish the new stable build?! Regards Rudi -- Rudolf Krist Mail: rudi.krist -at+ web.de PGP Key Id: 0x5C1708B8 ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5086 and major vulnerability fix
I have also only been able to download the 5085 build (today c. 10:00 am) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Build 5077, problems with routing summary and log rotating
Toad schrieb: On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote: Hi, when I try to view http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html (the routing summary), I get nothing back. But in freenet.log I find the following: D'oh. Will be fixed in 5078. It doesn't work in unstable builds too. see: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/12545/ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/12833/ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/12830/ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support/3853/ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: What does a map-file look like?
Garb schrieb: Then I heard something about a MAP-file, which I am lead to assume could be the solution to all my problems - or at least the ones not related to girls or money. It appears to be some sort of cross-reference between the real-world file-names and the URIs, but I have thus far been unable to find out exactly what it looks like or how to make them. When you use FIW, there you will find a feature called MetaDataBrowser, I'm not sure if that will help you, but there you could enter a freesite uri, like [EMAIL PROTECTED]/fuqid/10, to see what the mapfile of the freesite contains. You are right - that certainly seems to be exactly what I am looking for (if we exclude J.Lo's private phone number...). But where is that information actually located? It is not in the HTML-source of the page. Could it be in a special file with a name that FIW can somehow deduce from the URI of the main page? OK I will try to explain, what I have understood: Let us take a mapfile, for example SSK[-AT-]CKesZYUJWn2GMvoif1R4SDbujIgPAgM/fuqid/10 and look into it. (Using FIW) FIW outputs: Time taken: 180 Version Revision=1 EndPart Document Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]HDF~aaiE-kN4esHi7UHlaqb8wa4OAwI,UPPC82Q30Ni-ncWdLtiYBg Name=index.html Info.Format=text/html EndPart Document Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]~ZzKVquUvXfnbaI5bR12wvu99-4LAwI,~QYjCzYNT6E~kVIbxF7DoA Name=activelink.png Info.Format=image/png EndPart Document Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]avFnLFBKJLvl0MLrDqsLwfAbGwsUAwI,urShiYLrLx2DmIWsVvGtBw Name=FUQID-1.3.zip Info.Format=binary/zip-compressed EndPart Document Redirect.Target=freenet:SSK[-AT-]CKesZYUJWn2GMvoif1R4SDbujIgPAgM/fuqid/11 Name=.next Info.Format=text/html EndPart Document Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]HDF~aaiE-kN4esHi7UHlaqb8wa4OAwI,UPPC82Q30Ni-ncWdLtiYBg Info.Format=text/html End -- RawDataLength=0 Now I copy the content beginning with the line which contains Version and ending with the empty line after End, then go to Upload a file or NIM in FIW enter in the Field Key any key (CHK[-AT-], SSK[-AT-]priv-key/sitename, KSK[-AT-]any-string) then select the radio button Raw metadata and paste into the text-area the copied text and lets upload. So you will create a freesite that has the same contents as the FUQID Freesite. You also can upload some other html-files as CHKs and replace the entries in the mapfile. In this way you can create a freesite manually. Then you should look what happens when you enter some other keys in the URI line of the MetaDataBrowser. Some text-files, some binary files, some small ( 1KB) files, some big files ( 500KB, 1MB) and some splitfiles. I hope that all the questions will be answered after these small experiments. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Current proportion of requests being accepted: 0, 660
Using unstable build 60058 Since I set the the number of download threads from 50 to 70 in FUQID the proportion value began to decrease. Now ~ 2 hours running with 70 threads it is at 0,660 and seems to stay at this level. here are some settings of my node: outputBandwidthLimit=13001 maxNodeConnections=300 inputBandwidthLimit=7 I set the thread number to 70 because of the 7 KB/second input Bandwidth limit in average only 40% are used, rarely there were some peaks up to ~ 60% of the limit, even after I set the thread number to 70. Why did the proportion of requests, being accepted, decrease? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: What does a map-file look like?
Garb schrieb: Then I heard something about a MAP-file, which I am lead to assume could be the solution to all my problems or at least the ones not related to girls or money. It appears to be some sort of cross-reference between the real-world file-names and the URIs, but I have thus far been unable to find out exactly what it looks like or how to make them. When you use FIW, there you will find a feature called MetaDataBrowser, I'm not sure if that will help you, but there you could enter a freesite uri, like [EMAIL PROTECTED]/fuqid/10, to see what the mapfile of the freesite contains. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Bug Report - unstable 60029(60043) - Routing Summary doesn't work
On Freenet gateway the link Routing Summary (/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html), found on Node Status Interface (/servlet/nodestatus/) doesn't work. Still no change -- build 60043 When you don't need this feature, why the link is still on the page? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Pictures aren´t displayed
Michael Stather schrieb: [...] using the newest version, when letting the client run for about 5 minutes to connect and then opening an index page from the gateway page, the page loads immediately but the pictures aren´t displayed. One or two from the 300 ones are loaded but the rest not. This appears with every freenet page I view. Is this a network issue? Maybe http://freenetproject.org - FAQ - Why does Freenet only download 1 or 2 files at a time? will help. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage??
Hello, 2.5 hours ago I updated my node to the build 60016, and started it. Till now it has NO upload traffic (~300 bytes/sec). Normally my node is running ~10 Hours a day, since ~5 months. The node normally needs to reach my upload bandwidth limit (13 KB/s) within ~10 minutes after it was started. some stats: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 101 (27/74/512) Total amount of data transmitted/received 4.822 KiB/3.644 KiB Current upstream bandwidth usage257 bytes/second Instantaneous local traffic:4738,139 queries per hour diff default.ini freenet.ini ipAddress=XXX listenPort=XXX fcpHosts=XXX doAnnounce=yes diagnosticsPath=x:\xx\stats storeFile=x:\xx\storage storeSize=20480M routingDir=x:\xx\routing-data inputBandwidthLimit=7 outputBandwidthLimit=13000 logLevel=Normal logFile=x:\xx\freenet.log rtMaxRefs=70 rtMaxNodes=102 maxHopsToLive=15 initialRequestHTL=10 maximumThreads=150 tempDir=x:\xx\freenet\ mainport.params.servlet.1.params.passThroughMimeTypes=text/plain,image/jpeg,image/gif,image/png Need more data? freenet.log.gz Description: application/gzip ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage - lots of RNF
When I try to get a DBR Freesite (like DFI) I always get a RNF, I tried a lot of them from the History of my Browser. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage??
After 11 hours web interface still reported 19 bytes/second ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path* not handled
I have changed the logFile option in the freenet.ini file to an other path. But when I click on View Logfile ... in the context menu of the blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows me the old unused freenet.log in the freenet directory. Rudi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Ditto: Harmless at this stage, but annoying
Nicholas Sturm schrieb: The attachment shows a plaque (window?, but no frame or sash so how could it be a window) appeared in the middle of my desk and has not gone away after about 8 hours. Looks like it would still be using resources, but I have no idea if it did it's work. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] %initialRequestHTL=25
Hi! In my freenet.ini File I have found the option %initialRequestHTL=25, % means that this option is commented out. But I thought, that the options that are commented out initially with %, are defaults, so I wounder if the value of 25 as default for this option is not too high? When coevally the the maxHopsToLive option is set to 15? Rudi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Error Report, 60006, start failed, reseeding
Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding) Details I have got 2 computers in a small network. On one pc I already run a unstable node for a long time. Now I wanted to setup an a second node on an other pc, so I installed an stable node with freenet-webinstall.exe there. I also downloaded the noderefs.txt(?minCP=0.05minConnections=1) from my running node and saved it in freenet-node folder of the other node as seednodes.ref. Then I replaced the freenet.jar file with the unstable one and started freenet.exe. The result was a java.lang.NullPointerException, for more details see the attached cutout of the logfile. I also tried out to save the seednodes.ref as PC ASCII Format, or download the seednodes from the webserver, nothing was helpful. This behaviour is always reproduceable. Stable jar-file starts without any problems. Plattform: WinXP Pro JVM: 1.4.2_03-b02 Freenet: Fred,0.6,1.50,60006,CVS:1.704 Reproduce Steps: 1. Install stable node with freenet-webinstall.exe 2. Replace freenet.jar with freenet-unstable-latest.jar 3. Run freenet.exe RESULT: Starting fails, java.lang.NullPointerException Detailed System Information: Plattform: WinXP Pro, AMD Athlon, 500, 256 MB RAM JVM: Sun, 1.4.2_03-b02 Freenet: Fred,0.6,1.50,60006,CVS:1.704 Internet Connection: DSL: 768 kbit downstream / 128 kbit upstream Data Store: 1 GiB, Percent used: 0 diff default.ini/freenet.ini: ipAddress=XXX listenPort=XXX fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,localhost doAnnounce=yes storeSize=1024M inputBandwidthLimit=7 outputBandwidthLimit=8000 logLevel=Error rtMaxRefs=51 rtMaxNodes=102 maximumThreads=130 Regards Rudi freenet.log.bz2 Description: Binary data ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Error Report, 60006, start failed, reseeding
Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding) [...] Freenet: Fred,0.6,1.50,60006,CVS:1.704 [...] I also tested the builds 60005 and 60002, 60005 has shown the same behaviour, 60002 started successfully. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] freenet 5069 bug report - upload files nearly impossible (FEC)
I'm not able to upload files ( 5MB) into stable-network. Details Since some weeks I try to upload some healing blocks into stable network, on average the FEC-block size is 256 KB. Normally I use FUQID 1.3, but because it transfered 0.1 KB/s and reported a lot of Insert thread failed. Retrying... in the log, I also tried it directly with FProxy with the same result. When I set the Insertion-Thread-Number to a higher value than 5 the Current messageSendTimeRequest value in General Information of the web interface gets greater than 200%-300%. The maximum was 1%-15000% when I set the thread number to 30. The Transfers active value grows also from ~20-30 to ~180. Fproxy mostly reported ROUTE NOT FOUND on blocks where inserting was failed. Also the Instantaneous local traffic decreases significately. Heal HTL: 15 delete key from local node vefore inserting is checked The upstream bandwith usage is ~ 1 - 12500 B/sec. (12000 Maximum) Typically my node is running for periods of 3 - 10 h a day. Plattform: WinXP Pro JVM: 1.4.2_03-b02 Freenet: Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5069,CVS:1.90.2.50.2.96 Detailed System Information: Plattform: WinXP Pro, Pentium 3, 933 MHz, 512 MB RAM JVM: Sun, 1.4.2_03-b02 Freenet: Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5069,CVS:1.90.2.50.2.96 Internet Connection: DSL: 768 kbit downstream / 128 kbit upstream Data Store: 7 GiB, Percent used: 95 Mean Ustream Traffic: 1 - 12500 bytes/second unstable.ref: 2004-02-15 Typically number of connections: 100 - 180 diff default.ini/freenet.ini: ipAddress=XXX listenPort=XXX fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,localhost doAnnounce=yes storeSize=7168M inputBandwidthLimit=7 outputBandwidthLimit=12000 logLevel=Normal rtMaxRefs=51 rtMaxNodes=51 maxHopsToLive=25 maximumThreads=130 tempDir=XXX mainport.params.servlet.1.params.passThroughMimeTypes=text/plain,image/jpeg,image/gif,image/png Regards Rudi # Some Statistics # # Node ran 1 h before I started an upload with 30 Threads # now it runs ~3 h # -- Routing Table status: 18.02.2004 11:27:28 Number of node references 51 Attempted to contact node references17 Contacted node references 48 Connections with Successful Transfers 21 Backed off nodes17 Connection Attempts 1646 Successful Connections 1527 Lowest max estimated search time0ms Lowest max estimated DNF time 0ms Lowest global search time estimate 289962ms Highest global search time estimate 460245ms Lowest global transfer rate estimate2.318 bytes/second Highest global transfer rate estimate 3.643 bytes/second Lowest one hop probability of DNF 0,98 Highest one hop probability of DNF 0,99 Lowest one hop probability of transfer failure 0,79 Highest one hop probability of transfer failure 0,92 Single hop probability of QueryRejected 0.29645163211077075 Single hop average time for QueryRejected 87863.09895443736 Single hop probability of early timeout 0.6783154528702626 Single hop average time for early timeout 24009.760728425113 Single hop probability of search timeout0.9186481377761555 Single hop average time for search timeout 316643.7063678293 Total number of requests that didn't QR 23767 Total number of reqests that timed out before a QR or Accepted 6676 Implementation freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable #... # #-- Load # Current routingTime 0ms Current messageSendTimeRequest 7220ms Pooled threads running jobs 5 (3,8%) Pooled threads which are idle 25 Current upstream bandwidth usage11215 bytes/second (93,5%) Reason for refusing connections:avgMessageSendTimeRequest(7220,250) successfulSendTimeCutoff(2000,000) Reason for QueryRejecting requests: Estimated load (100%) overloadHigh (80%)Estimated load (100%) overloadHigh (80%) It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load for QueryReject purposes 100% Current estimated load for rate limiting722% [Rejecting incoming connections and requests!] Reason for load:Load due to thread limit = 3,8% Load due to routingTime = 0% = 0% / 100.000% = overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 722% = 722.025% / 100.000% overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 93,5% because outputBytes(672911) limit (576000,009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0,8) * outputBandwidthLimit (12000) * 60 Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load): 0.9998 Current estimated requests per hour (based on last 10 mins):5772.0 Current global quota (requests per hour): 799.4182883301385 Current recommended request interval sent to client nodes 2.147483647E9ms ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at
[freenet-support] Re: How to increase JVM max allocateable memory
Niklas Bergh wrote: Set JavaMem to 256M or similar. Run java -X for documentation on that parameter. Hmmm.. Looks like 'Jflags=-Xmx320m' really should have handled this if.. At least if it is used and if it was set to '-Xmx320M'... JavaMem works, I asked because some months ago I had the same problem, and then this option didn't work, so I started the node manually with java.exe -Xmx320m -jar freenet.jar. But later the node didn't work when I started it manually (Build ~6396)... Thanks Rudi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Bug or Feature?
Hello, after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only contained nodes with the Build Nr. = 6415. Is that a new feature? Or was it not intended? Regards Rudi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
