Re: Seamonkey 'File bookmark' strange window
Zanqeutil wrote: I'm Using Semonkey 2.7.2, Local NL Version, Windows XP SP3 I have recently copied a working profile from my old PC to another PC. I installed Seamonkey 2.7.2 on this new PC using the old profile. Everything is working correctly. But a noticed a minor flaw. When I want to add a new bookmark via Bookmarks/ File Bookmark Ctrl-D, a window pops up, but it's too wide Picture too wide Window: http://tinypic.com/r/hwejxg/5 I also have a Portable Seamonkey 2.7.2 on a external drive, it shows the normal, much smaller File Bookmark window Picture normal window: http://tinypic.com/r/2v1qkk9/5 Difference: the portable Seamonkey version uses a fresh profile. The installed Seamonkey uses an old profile, updated since Seamonkey 2.1 Is there a way/ prefs setting to get the smaller normal Window back ? Normal Window http://i44.tinypic.com/2v1qkk9.jpg Wide Window http://i41.tinypic.com/hwejxg.jpg Thanks, Zanqeutil Grab hold of one of the sides of the screen with your mouse pointer and reduce the width of the window. Works for me! Daniel -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 'File bookmark' strange window
Daniel schreef: Zanqeutil wrote: I'm Using Semonkey 2.7.2, Local NL Version, Windows XP SP3 I have recently copied a working profile from my old PC to another PC. I installed Seamonkey 2.7.2 on this new PC using the old profile. Everything is working correctly. But a noticed a minor flaw. When I want to add a new bookmark via Bookmarks/ File Bookmark Ctrl-D, a window pops up, but it's too wide Picture too wide Window: http://tinypic.com/r/hwejxg/5 I also have a Portable Seamonkey 2.7.2 on a external drive, it shows the normal, much smaller File Bookmark window Picture normal window: http://tinypic.com/r/2v1qkk9/5 Difference: the portable Seamonkey version uses a fresh profile. The installed Seamonkey uses an old profile, updated since Seamonkey 2.1 Is there a way/ prefs setting to get the smaller normal Window back ? Normal Window http://i44.tinypic.com/2v1qkk9.jpg Wide Window http://i41.tinypic.com/hwejxg.jpg Thanks, Zanqeutil Grab hold of one of the sides of the screen with your mouse pointer and reduce the width of the window. Works for me! Daniel I tried that several times but that does nothing. When I click on the sides I get a system error sound (sort of doink) and the bookmark window flickers a bit. Resizing is impossible, it's fixed and locked. I can move the window left/right/up/down when I click/grab the top bar with the red X but nothing else. Regards, Zanqeutil ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 'File bookmark' strange window
Zanqeutil: Daniel schreef: Zanqeutil wrote: I have recently copied a working profile from my old PC to another PC. I installed Seamonkey 2.7.2 on this new PC using the old profile. Everything is working correctly. But a noticed a minor flaw. When I want to add a new bookmark via Bookmarks/ File Bookmark Ctrl-D, a window pops up, but it's too wide Picture too wide Window: http://tinypic.com/r/hwejxg/5 Grab hold of one of the sides of the screen with your mouse pointer and reduce the width of the window. Works for me! I tried that several times but that does nothing. When I click on the sides I get a system error sound (sort of doink) and the bookmark window flickers a bit. Resizing is impossible, it's fixed and locked. I would rename the file localstore.rdf in the profile of the stubborn SM after closing it. The file will be recreated the next time SM starts. But you will lose custom settings you have made in the past. Therefore renaming and not deleting, so you have a way to go back if needed. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 'File bookmark' strange window
Hartmut Figge schreef: Zanqeutil: Daniel schreef: Zanqeutil wrote: I have recently copied a working profile from my old PC to another PC. I installed Seamonkey 2.7.2 on this new PC using the old profile. Everything is working correctly. But a noticed a minor flaw. When I want to add a new bookmark via Bookmarks/ File Bookmark Ctrl-D, a window pops up, but it's too wide Picture too wide Window: http://tinypic.com/r/hwejxg/5 Grab hold of one of the sides of the screen with your mouse pointer and reduce the width of the window. Works for me! I tried that several times but that does nothing. When I click on the sides I get a system error sound (sort of doink) and the bookmark window flickers a bit. Resizing is impossible, it's fixed and locked. I would rename the file localstore.rdf in the profile of the stubborn SM after closing it. The file will be recreated the next time SM starts. But you will lose custom settings you have made in the past. Therefore renaming and not deleting, so you have a way to go back if needed. Hartmut Thanks Harmut, I followed your suggestion and renaming localstore.rdf did the trick. I now have the much smaller (not too wide) file Bookmark window back and as you mentioned some window settings have been changed back to the standard SM configuration after the new localstore.rdf was created, but that is easy to change. Thanks again for your help. Regards, Zanqeutil ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
why can I not see submit section of page
My wife has been trying to post a comment to this page for some time I resorted to IE to see submit section http://thankfullga447.blogspot.com/2012/02/polka-dot-giveaway.html any ideas what is wrong thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why can I not see submit section of page
Smiles wrote: My wife has been trying to post a comment to this page for some time I resorted to IE to see submit section http://thankfullga447.blogspot.com/2012/02/polka-dot-giveaway.html any ideas what is wrong thanks I see it after scrolling all the way down to it. It is not visible when I disable JavaScript. -- SeaMonkey | openSUSE 11.4(x86_64) | Gnome 2.32.1 | 1.8GHz CPU | 2GB RAM Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en Firefox Support: http://support.mozilla.org Profile Manager: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why can I not see submit section of page
Smiles wrote: My wife has been trying to post a comment to this page for some time I resorted to IE to see submit section http://thankfullga447.blogspot.com/2012/02/polka-dot-giveaway.html any ideas what is wrong Blogspot don't like old Seamonkey versions any more. I still have 2.0.14 and have the same problem. You have an even older version. I changed the user agent string in about:config to Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 (that's what WLS has in a more recent SM version) And I was able to at least see the comment submit area, but I don't tried to post any comment there. Have to try it somewhere else. ;) -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why can I not see submit section of page
On 02/25/2012 10:16 AM, Arne wrote: Smiles wrote: My wife has been trying to post a comment to this page for some time I resorted to IE to see submit section http://thankfullga447.blogspot.com/2012/02/polka-dot-giveaway.html any ideas what is wrong Blogspot don't like old Seamonkey versions any more. I still have 2.0.14 and have the same problem. You have an even older version. I changed the user agent string in about:config to Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 (that's what WLS has in a more recent SM version) And I was able to at least see the comment submit area, but I don't tried to post any comment there. Have to try it somewhere else. ;) Sorry, I assumed he was using the current version of SeaMonkey. Gotta get into the habit of checking the user agent I guess. Since posters don't have the common sense to identify which operating system and application version they are using. If I had I wouldn't have responded, or responded with Your SeaMonkey 2.0.3 is out dated and should no longer be supported, update to SeaMonkey 2.7.2. -- Thunderbird Daily | openSUSE 11.4 Linux Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java
On 2/24/12 8:41 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I just wrote: NoOp wrote: Seems your Java is a bit out of date. Even linux has: Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_31 File: /opt/java/32/jre1.6.0_31/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so Version: As out of date goes, the difference between 1.6.0_30 and 1.6.0_31 is pretty minor. What am I, a week behind? My Java console says Java Update was last run at 1:52 PM on 2/24/12. ... So is that such a BFD that the time website won't work at all? Fine, I'll update if you think it'll make you happy. Amazing, that worked! Who'da thunk that site would be so cutting-edge that a week-old version of Java would break it? Usually government sites are way /behind/ the times. I was seeing much of the same problems with http://www.time.gov/ that others reported here. That was with SeaMonkey 2.7.2 and Java Java J2SE RTE 6 update 31 (full version 1.6.0_31-b05), which is the latest Java version. I shut down SeaMonkey and restarted it, and the problems went away. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java
David E. Ross wrote: On 2/24/12 8:41 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I just wrote: NoOp wrote: Seems your Java is a bit out of date. Even linux has: Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_31 File: /opt/java/32/jre1.6.0_31/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so Version: As out of date goes, the difference between 1.6.0_30 and 1.6.0_31 is pretty minor. What am I, a week behind? My Java console says Java Update was last run at 1:52 PM on 2/24/12. ... So is that such a BFD that the time website won't work at all? Fine, I'll update if you think it'll make you happy. Amazing, that worked! Who'da thunk that site would be so cutting-edge that a week-old version of Java would break it? Usually government sites are way /behind/ the times. I was seeing much of the same problems withhttp://www.time.gov/ that others reported here. That was with SeaMonkey 2.7.2 and Java Java J2SE RTE 6 update 31 (full version 1.6.0_31-b05), which is the latest Java version. I shut down SeaMonkey and restarted it, and the problems went away. David, I tried the new Java update before launching SeaMonkey and had several major problems with Time Clock page (SeaMonkey froze and required the 3 finger salute(CTRL + DEL)). Killing the SeaMonkey process regained control over my Win XP Pro sr3 system. Shutting down and warm booting restored SeaMonkey and the Time Clock Java application worked without flaws. Michael G -- Armadillo Web Development www.armadilloweb.com Cell: 903.244.3644 Opening your Door to Opportunity and inviting the world to walk through. Character is doing the right thing... Even when no one is watching... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 'File bookmark' strange window
Zanqeutil wrote: Daniel schreef: Zanqeutil wrote: Is there a way/ prefs setting to get the smaller normal Window back ? Normal Window http://i44.tinypic.com/2v1qkk9.jpg Wide Window http://i41.tinypic.com/hwejxg.jpg Grab hold of one of the sides of the screen with your mouse pointer and reduce the width of the window. Works for me! I tried that several times but that does nothing. When I click on the sides I get a system error sound (sort of doink) and the bookmark window flickers a bit. Resizing is impossible, it's fixed and locked. You don't click the window borders, you hover the cursor and it will change to a border-dragging symbol. *Then* click (once) and drag the window to an appropriate width or height. Also, hovering a corner will change to a diagonal arrow for click/drag. I can move the window left/right/up/down when I click/grab the top bar with the red X but nothing else. That's what you should expect if you click in the window title bar. To resize it, you need to hover an actual border of the window. This is all standard GUI stuff from way back to Windows 2.0, and earlier in other graphical operating systems. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Username / Password Q
On 2/24/12 7:49 PM, robertb...@localnet.com wrote: How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? It works the same way as for http sites. The problem is that some http and https sites have code that blocks the saving of passwords. This can be overcome in most (not all) cases with the Remember Passwords extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remember-passwords/. For a few sites that use a JavaScript-generated window for login (e.g., Slashdot), I disable JavaScript before selecting the Login link to get an alternative login Web page. I then enable JavaScript before selecting the Login button on that page. I use the PrefBar extension to toggle between enable and disable for JavaScript; there is a checkbox for this on the PrefBar toolbar. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why can I not see submit section of page
WLS wrote: On 02/25/2012 10:16 AM, Arne wrote: Smiles wrote: My wife has been trying to post a comment to this page for some time I resorted to IE to see submit section http://thankfullga447.blogspot.com/2012/02/polka-dot-giveaway.html any ideas what is wrong Blogspot don't like old Seamonkey versions any more. I still have 2.0.14 and have the same problem. You have an even older version. I changed the user agent string in about:config to Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 (that's what WLS has in a more recent SM version) And I was able to at least see the comment submit area, but I don't tried to post any comment there. Have to try it somewhere else. ;) If I had I wouldn't have responded, or responded with Your SeaMonkey 2.0.3 is out dated and should no longer be supported, update to SeaMonkey 2.7.2. I may update sometime in the future, if the developers can make the newer versions work as we (as users) want it to work. At the moment there has been to much complaints about all new versions, after 2.0.14, about issues I don't like in the newer versions. I'm also sick of updating the browser several times every moth, with the following hassle to get it work the same way as before the update, with e.g. add-ons and extensions I need but don't work. Since the easiest way now to update, is to unistall 2.0.14 and start from scratch with a new version, I am in the process to move all my new mail correspondence to an other mail software, so I at least have them safe when/if the time comes to upgrade. Also bookmarks is to be saved as a web page. I have tried some other browsers, in case I have to abandon SM. Also use them if I have to, but I don't like the way all new browser versions are taking. I like what I have now with SM 2.0.14 and would appreciate if new versions could stay that way. -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Username / Password Q
On 2/25/12 10:00 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 2/24/12 7:49 PM, robertb...@localnet.com wrote: How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? It works the same way as for http sites. The problem is that some http and https sites have code that blocks the saving of passwords. This can be overcome in most (not all) cases with the Remember Passwords extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remember-passwords/. For a few sites that use a JavaScript-generated window for login (e.g., Slashdot), I disable JavaScript before selecting the Login link to get an alternative login Web page. I then enable JavaScript before selecting the Login button on that page. I use the PrefBar extension to toggle between enable and disable for JavaScript; there is a checkbox for this on the PrefBar toolbar. The JavaScript problem is bug #355063 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355063. The blocking problem is bug #425145 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425145. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why can I not see submit section of page
Interviewed by CNN on 25/02/2012 16:11, Arne told the world: I may update sometime in the future, if the developers can make the newer versions work as we (as users) want it to work. At the moment there has been to much complaints about all new versions, after 2.0.14, about issues I don't like in the newer versions. Well, you have to take into account that in every endeavor, the complaints are always heard louder than the praise. There are lots of people -- including me -- perfectly happy with the new versions of Seamonkey. We just aren't as prone to mention it in this forum. Do you have any specific concerns that are keeping you from upgrading? Perhaps we can clear up some points or offer an acceptable alternative. I'm also sick of updating the browser several times every moth, with the following hassle to get it work the same way as before the update, with e.g. add-ons and extensions I need but don't work. Well, I wouldn't say several times a month. It's supposed to be once every six weeks, but there has been on average about one intermediate chemspill update between those, to address can't-wait serious issues that have been recently discovered. But those chemspill updates tend to change very little that's visible to the user. Making add=ons work has become actually easier recently. Now in many cases Seamonkey will by default accept an add-on even if technically it is marked as incompatible. For other cases, the easiest workaround is to install the Add-On Compatibility Reporter extension. Since the easiest way now to update, is to unistall 2.0.14 and start from scratch with a new version, I am in the process to move all my new mail correspondence to an other mail software, so I at least have them safe when/if the time comes to upgrade. Also bookmarks is to be saved as a web page. Well, I wouldn't say that's the easiest way. Upgrading from 2.0.x to higher versions is usually straightforward: just download the latest version and install it over the old one. If you really, really want to preserve your download history (most users don't care), you can upgrade to 2.1.x as an intermediate step. Of course, backing up your profile is a sensible precaution. Isn't it always? But starting from scratch -- with a clean slate -- does have its points, I admit. It's more work, since you have to redo just about all your settings, but you will arguably end up with a more stable system, not carrying as much old cruft. Re bookmarks... yeah, in 2.1 and higher those are stored in a database, no longer in bookmarks.html. But if you like having bookmarks.html available, there's an option (I forget what it is, since I don't use it) to tell Seamonkey to auto-export an updated bookmarks.html every time it closes down. I have tried some other browsers, in case I have to abandon SM. Also use them if I have to, but I don't like the way all new browser versions are taking. I like what I have now with SM 2.0.14 and would appreciate if new versions could stay that way. Well, not everybody likes changes, I concede. But it's pretty hard to avoid them. Not only is the Internet moving on, with what were newfangled experimental capabilities a couple years ago now in the process of becoming basic requirements for many sites, but also there's the security problem. Security flaws are discovered all the time, and older, no longer supported version aren't going to be fixed. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my VT-100. * Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.7.2 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 'File bookmark' strange window
Beauregard T. Shagnasty schreef: Zanqeutil wrote: Daniel schreef: Zanqeutil wrote: Is there a way/ prefs setting to get the smaller normal Window back ? Normal Window http://i44.tinypic.com/2v1qkk9.jpg Wide Window http://i41.tinypic.com/hwejxg.jpg Grab hold of one of the sides of the screen with your mouse pointer and reduce the width of the window. Works for me! I tried that several times but that does nothing. When I click on the sides I get a system error sound (sort of doink) and the bookmark window flickers a bit. Resizing is impossible, it's fixed and locked. You don't click the window borders, you hover the cursor and it will change to a border-dragging symbol. *Then* click (once) and drag the window to an appropriate width or height. Also, hovering a corner will change to a diagonal arrow for click/drag. I can move the window left/right/up/down when I click/grab the top bar with the red X but nothing else. That's what you should expect if you click in the window title bar. To resize it, you need to hover an actual border of the window. This is all standard GUI stuff from way back to Windows 2.0, and earlier in other graphical operating systems. Standard GUI stuff since Windows 2.0 and earlier, You mean DOS 1.0 ? Yes, very nice explanation, it should work like this, but it did not because the localstore.rdf file in some way was corrupted as Hartmut Figge explained to me. I followed his advise and all is well now. Question for you: Do a Ctrl-D, the file Bookmark Window pops up, can you hover the borders to enlarge or decrease the window as you can in the Bookmark manager ? I have the standard smaller file bookmark manager window back but in SM 2.7.2 still no way to hover the borders, no arrow cursor symbols and not in SM 2.7.2 portable. You can't even do this in Firefox 1.0.0.2, try it, I can't, at least not on my system. I have an older Portable SM 2.0.1.4 on an USB stick, there I can do this. There I see the double arrow cursor symbols in the File Bookmark window. Here I can make this window smaller/bigger. Zanqeutil ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
MetaStream 3 Plugin
While updating plugins, and looking over the list, I see this MetaStream 3 Plugin, disabled. Don't remember putting it in, nor disabling it. A Web search has some ideas, but I find them somewhat inconsistent and confusing. Question--can/should I uninstall this plugin? Is it related to ViewPoint Media Player (which I also don't recall installing, but the Web search says they're related)? Can I also uninstall that? Don't need any unnecessary stuff hanging around! Larry (This group more reliable than the Web!) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why can I not see submit section of page
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 25/02/2012 16:11, Arne told the world: I may update sometime in the future, if the developers can make the newer versions work as we (as users) want it to work. At the moment there has been to much complaints about all new versions, after 2.0.14, about issues I don't like in the newer versions. Well, you have to take into account that in every endeavor, the complaints are always heard louder than the praise. There are lots of people -- including me -- perfectly happy with the new versions of Seamonkey. We just aren't as prone to mention it in this forum. Yes, I understand there are users who are satisfied with the newer versions. But when evaluating a version I read the complaints and decide if they are about something that also I will be unhappy with. And it has been so, to many times. Well, I wouldn't say several times a month. Sorry, It just my feeling I guess, because when my other browsers get updated I hardy notice it. With SM I always notice it because something always get to the point that I have to fix in one way or an other. Not always hard to do, but still what I want to do to keep everything as it was and how I want it to be, if possible. Making add=ons work has become actually easier recently. Now in many cases Seamonkey will by default accept an add-on even if technically it is marked as incompatible. For other cases, the easiest workaround is to install the Add-On Compatibility Reporter extension. As it was way back at least, I hardy get them work after an update before a new update was announced. So I used to hold the updates until I was sure there was at least the most valuable (for me) add-ons that was compatible with the version I updating to. So I have always been a bit behind with the SM updates. Well, I wouldn't say that's the easiest way. Upgrading from 2.0.x to higher versions is usually straightforward: just download the latest version and install it over the old one. If you really, really want to preserve your download history (most users don't care), you can upgrade to 2.1.x as an intermediate step. That's what a lot of complaints has been about, the upgrading has not been straightforward. And I don't care about the download history either. Well, not everybody likes changes, I concede. But it's pretty hard to avoid them. I guess I have to change my Internet habits and in the future settle with just what is strictly necessary, like paying my bills. :\ -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
email account password
Using SM 1.1.19. I am trying to set up an additional email account. Somehow in the account set-up process, it doesn't ask for a password, but then when I try to access the account, SM wants a password. Sometimes I get a message saying enter the new password, or something like that, so I enter one but then SM won't accept it. This makes no sense to me. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Key press delay
Mac OS 10.6.8 iMac 7,1 Fall 2007 SM 2.7.2 When I'm typing a message, either in answer to someone else's post or an original for me to post to the list, I frequently find the appearance of the letters on the screen lag the pressing of the keyboard keys by as much as 3 seconds. If I ignore that and keep typing, eventually the words will appear, but not smoothly, as in a word processor. I merely want to know why that is. Suggestions welcome. As one might guess, it hasn't happened to THIS post yet. Go figure... keith whaley ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
email account password
Using SM 1.1.19. I am trying to set up an additional email account. Somehow in the account set-up process, it doesn't ask for a password, but then when I try to access the account, SM wants a password. Sometimes I get a message saying enter the new password, or something like that, so I do but it won't accept it. This makes no sense to me. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email account password
On 02/25/2012 05:08 PM, David Lawler wrote: Using SM 1.1.19. I am trying to set up an additional email account. Somehow in the account set-up process, it doesn't ask for a password, but then when I try to access the account, SM wants a password. Sometimes I get a message saying enter the new password, or something like that, so I do but it won't accept it. This makes no sense to me. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks SeaMonkey 1.1.19 is outdated, subject to a whole nightmare of security vulnerabilities. http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/ -- Thunderbird Daily | openSUSE 11.4 Linux Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email account password
stango wrote: David Lawler wrote: Using SM 1.1.19. I am trying to set up an additional email account. Somehow in the account set-up process, it doesn't ask for a password, but then when I try to access the account, SM wants a password. Sometimes I get a message saying enter the new password, or something like that, so I enter one but then SM won't accept it. This makes no sense to me. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks In the SM 1.1.19 email tool bar select Tools, then Password Manager, then Stored Passwords. Scroll down toward the bottom of the list and you will find all of your mail boxes identified by 'mailbox://'. Click on the box 'Show Passwords' and, if one has been assigned to the mailbox ion question, you will be able to see it. If no password has been assigned, I would delete the mailbox entry and recreate the email account. Do not forget to click on 'Hide Passwords' to reset it. -- Stan Gondek Multi Path Communications http://www.m-p-c.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email account password
David Lawler wrote: Using SM 1.1.19. I am trying to set up an additional email account. Somehow in the account set-up process, it doesn't ask for a password, but then when I try to access the account, SM wants a password. Sometimes I get a message saying enter the new password, or something like that, so I enter one but then SM won't accept it. This makes no sense to me. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks In the SM 1.1.19 email tool bar select Tools, then Password Manager. Scroll down toward the bottom of the list and you will find all of your mail boxes identified by 'mailbox://'. Click on the box 'Show Passwords' and, if one has been assigned to the mailbox ion question, you will be able to see it. If no password has been assigned, I would delete the mailbox entry and recreate the email account. Do not forget to click on 'Hide Passwords' to reset it. -- Stan Gondek Multi Path Communications http://www.m-p-c.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java
On 02/24/2012 08:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: NoOp wrote: On 02/24/2012 05:09 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Tom Stoudt wrote: This is the clock page that uses Java: http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java When Java is turned off it lets you know. The other one listed above is only a time snapshot. OK, here's the error I get: Java Plug-in 1.6.0_30 Using JRE version 1.6.0_30-b12 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM User home directory = C:\Users\[sanitized for security reasons] ... Seems your Java is a bit out of date. Even linux has: Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_31 File: /opt/java/32/jre1.6.0_31/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so Version: As out of date goes, the difference between 1.6.0_30 and 1.6.0_31 is pretty minor. What am I, a week behind? My Java console says Java Update was last run at 1:52 PM on 2/24/12. I see... so a 'critical' security release is pretty minor: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpufeb2012-366318.html And to answer your question from your other post So do I or don't I have Java enabled?: ensure that cookies and java is turned on and then go to: http://java.com/ - click on 'Do I have Java?' - that will take you to: http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp - Click on 'Verify Java Version' If your Java is current, then is should come back with: Verified Java Version Congratulations! You have the recommended Java installed (Version 6 Update 31). So is that such a BFD that the time website won't work at all? So let me get this correct: you ask in the other post So do I or don't I have Java enabled?, I provide you with information to verify: 1) that you have java enabled (or not), and 2) which version of Java you have enabled. You then come back with dick swinging 'BFD' remark (were you shy to say 'Big Fucking Deal'... or did you have something else in mind?). And the Fine, I'll update if you think it'll make you happy. below. Just who (oh let's do the WTF... shall we) do you thing you are? Someone attempts to assist you and you fire off with BFT and the following. Fine, I'll update if you think it'll make you happy. You do that. Bye now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java
NoOp wrote: So let me get this correct: you ask in the other post So do I or don't I have Java enabled?, I provide you with information to verify: 1) that you have java enabled (or not), and 2) which version of Java you have enabled. You then come back with dick swinging 'BFD' remark (were you shy to say 'Big Fucking Deal'... or did you have something else in mind?). And the Fine, I'll update if you think it'll make you happy. below. Just who (oh let's do the WTF... shall we) do you thing you are? Someone attempts to assist you and you fire off with BFT and the following. ... Oh, didn't you get the memo? I'm Lord God of the Universe, and if you work really hard, one day you can aspire to be my humble servant. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Key press delay
Keith Whaley wrote: When I'm typing a message, either in answer to someone else's post or an original for me to post to the list, I frequently find the appearance of the letters on the screen lag the pressing of the keyboard keys by as much as 3 seconds. If I ignore that and keep typing, eventually the words will appear, but not smoothly, as in a word processor. I merely want to know why that is. Suggestions welcome. Can you have an activity monitor running while you are typing to see if the OS is off doing something else while the keystrokes wait in the buffer? I had a serious case of that a few years ago that we traced to a lot of extraneous re-paints. Ray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Key press delay
Keith Whaley wrote: Mac OS 10.6.8 iMac 7,1 Fall 2007 SM 2.7.2 When I'm typing a message, either in answer to someone else's post or an original for me to post to the list, I frequently find the appearance of the letters on the screen lag the pressing of the keyboard keys by as much as 3 seconds. If I ignore that and keep typing, eventually the words will appear, but not smoothly, as in a word processor. I merely want to know why that is. Suggestions welcome. As one might guess, it hasn't happened to THIS post yet. Go figure... keith whaley I see that too, usually when typing a password;particularly when SM gives me an unsolicited prompt for my Master and I don't catch that the cursor has shifted to that dialog...like just now. I'm running the same same setup as you, 4G of RAM installed. Outside of the annoying (and long standing) random SM Master Password prompt bug, I generally chalk the keystroke lag up to processor overload...or USB arbitration. How many things have you got hooked up and active, and how much RAM do you have installed? You could always pull up Activity Monitor and give it a watch. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Username / Password Q
My experience has shown that It DOES NOT work the same way as for http sites. So far,all http sites are accepted and (i think - because i have so few) all https sites are ignored. So i have downloaded that add-on and as they say, We Shall See. THANKS. Quoting David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid: On 2/24/12 7:49 PM, robertb...@localnet.com wrote: How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? It works the same way as for http sites. The problem is that some http and https sites have code that blocks the saving of passwords. This can be overcome in most (not all) cases with the Remember Passwords extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remember-passwords/. For a few sites that use a JavaScript-generated window for login (e.g., Slashdot), I disable JavaScript before selecting the Login link to get an alternative login Web page. I then enable JavaScript before selecting the Login button on that page. I use the PrefBar extension to toggle between enable and disable for JavaScript; there is a checkbox for this on the PrefBar toolbar. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Username / Password Q
I've had to do this before, and this is one set of solutions - http://www.werockyourweb.com/force-firefox-save-password I know I did something to a .js file, but I can't recall what, exactly. I also use an add-on called HTTPS Everywhere that forces every site to/though https: if it is available and SM Password Manager seems to still function as with http: navigation for those instances. -- - Rufus robertb...@localnet.com wrote: My experience has shown that It DOES NOT work the same way as for http sites. So far,all http sites are accepted and (i think - because i have so few) all https sites are ignored. So i have downloaded that add-on and as they say, We Shall See. THANKS. Quoting David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid: On 2/24/12 7:49 PM, robertb...@localnet.com wrote: How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? It works the same way as for http sites. The problem is that some http and https sites have code that blocks the saving of passwords. This can be overcome in most (not all) cases with the Remember Passwords extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remember-passwords/. For a few sites that use a JavaScript-generated window for login (e.g., Slashdot), I disable JavaScript before selecting the Login link to get an alternative login Web page. I then enable JavaScript before selecting the Login button on that page. I use the PrefBar extension to toggle between enable and disable for JavaScript; there is a checkbox for this on the PrefBar toolbar. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
