Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-17 Thread A Williams

Bret Busby wrote:

On 17/07/2015, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

On 17/07/2015, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:



Has anyone ever called Flash venerable?  I doubt that it is worthy of
that much respect.



I thought that it was only a bead that was venerable; the venerable bead.


If you are referring to the Anglo-Saxon Monk, Priest, and Scholar it is
actually Bede.
Keith



I was being facetious.


From what I understand, that Bede was a creative historian, with

recording as having existed, King Arthur and the Knights Of the Round
Table, possibly dragons, and other fantasy things. Whether he also
recorded Asterix and Obelix, as having saved Londinium from the
Romans, I am not sure.



Never let the truth get in the way of a good story?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-17 Thread Daniel

On 17/07/2015 3:35 PM, Bret Busby wrote:

On 17/07/2015, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

On 17/07/2015, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:



Has anyone ever called Flash venerable?  I doubt that it is worthy of
that much respect.



I thought that it was only a bead that was venerable; the venerable bead.


If you are referring to the Anglo-Saxon Monk, Priest, and Scholar it is
actually Bede.
Keith



I was being facetious.


From what I understand, that Bede was a creative historian, with

recording as having existed, King Arthur and the Knights Of the Round
Table, possibly dragons, and other fantasy things. Whether he also
recorded Asterix and Obelix, as having saved Londinium from the
Romans, I am not sure.


But everyone knows that King Arthur and the Knights Of the Round Table 
existed!! That's why Rick Wakeman did a tribute album to them back in 
about 1975!!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myths_and_Legends_of_King_Arthur_and_the_Knights_of_the_Round_Table

Cross-posted to, and Follow-up set to, moz.gen

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909

or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-16 Thread EE

A Williams wrote:

John Duncan wrote:

rjkrjk wrote:

follow the link to adobe, and d/l current version 1800 209



Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 7/14/2015 12:27 AM:

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use
with caution yesterday
and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.

Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons
manager under the Tools
menu and clicked on Check to see if your plugins are up to date
which takes me to
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that
all versions of Adobe's
Flash Player are currently vulnerable.

BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has
been blocked by
Seamonkey because it is outdated?

Thanks,
Paul.


https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-04.html

How safe?  That's relative to YOUR browsing habits and computer
knowledge.
I am not the least bit concerned about my machines.
The small kids next door probably already have their computers
infected.


A good point, but still, technically speaking, all versions of flash
(and newer versions of the java plugin) have some nasty new 0-days
because of that stupid italian ``hacking team'' that recently themselves
got hacked. Still, with good browsing habits and a bit of common sense,
most power users should be fine.


In this context, the Italian Hacking Job was a good thing.  The Italians
were already using the exploit and now everybody is aware of it.  I read
just now that the count of flaws in Flash found so far this month is
up to 38.  Finally people are thinking of killing the beast.

Was the message really Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution?
That would imply it was simply complaining about an older version.


Has anyone ever called Flash venerable?  I doubt that it is worthy of 
that much respect.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-16 Thread Bret Busby
On 17/07/2015, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:


 Has anyone ever called Flash venerable?  I doubt that it is worthy of
 that much respect.


I thought that it was only a bead that was venerable; the venerable bead.

I thought that flash and its problems, were more venereal.

-- 
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..

So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means.
- Deep Thought,
 Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
 A Trilogy In Four Parts,
 written by Douglas Adams,
 published by Pan Books, 1992


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-16 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Bret Busby wrote:
 On 17/07/2015, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:
 

 Has anyone ever called Flash venerable?  I doubt that it is worthy of
 that much respect.

 
 I thought that it was only a bead that was venerable; the venerable bead.
 
If you are referring to the Anglo-Saxon Monk, Priest, and Scholar it is
actually Bede.
Keith

 I thought that flash and its problems, were more venereal.
 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-16 Thread Bret Busby
On 17/07/2015, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote:
 Bret Busby wrote:
 On 17/07/2015, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:


 Has anyone ever called Flash venerable?  I doubt that it is worthy of
 that much respect.


 I thought that it was only a bead that was venerable; the venerable bead.

 If you are referring to the Anglo-Saxon Monk, Priest, and Scholar it is
 actually Bede.
 Keith


I was being facetious.

From what I understand, that Bede was a creative historian, with
recording as having existed, King Arthur and the Knights Of the Round
Table, possibly dragons, and other fantasy things. Whether he also
recorded Asterix and Obelix, as having saved Londinium from the
Romans, I am not sure.

-- 
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..

So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means.
- Deep Thought,
 Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
 A Trilogy In Four Parts,
 written by Douglas Adams,
 published by Pan Books, 1992


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-15 Thread Mason83
On 15/07/2015 02:25, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
 I had the latest Flash version when I received the message: Shockwave 
 Flash is venerable. Use with caution, which is the exact wording of the 
 message. Mozilla was not complaining about an older version, but the 
 latest version I had downloaded a few minutes earlier.

The exact wording was probably:

https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/locales/en-US/chrome/mozapps/extensions/extensions.properties#43

Shockwave Flash is known to be vulnerable. Use with caution.

vulnerable (more likely to be exposed to malicious programs)
not venerable (commanding respect because of age, ...)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vulnerable
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/venerable

Regards.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-14 Thread rjkrjk

follow the link to adobe, and d/l current version 1800 209



Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 7/14/2015 12:27 AM:

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution 
yesterday
and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.

Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons manager 
under the Tools
menu and clicked on Check to see if your plugins are up to date which takes 
me to
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that all versions 
of Adobe's
Flash Player are currently vulnerable.

BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has been 
blocked by
Seamonkey because it is outdated?

Thanks,
Paul.


https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-04.html

How safe?  That's relative to YOUR browsing habits and computer knowledge.
I am not the least bit concerned about my machines.
The small kids next door probably already have their computers infected.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-14 Thread John Duncan

rjkrjk wrote:

follow the link to adobe, and d/l current version 1800 209



Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 7/14/2015 12:27 AM:

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use
with caution yesterday
and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.

Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons
manager under the Tools
menu and clicked on Check to see if your plugins are up to date
which takes me to
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that
all versions of Adobe's
Flash Player are currently vulnerable.

BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has
been blocked by
Seamonkey because it is outdated?

Thanks,
Paul.


https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-04.html

How safe?  That's relative to YOUR browsing habits and computer
knowledge.
I am not the least bit concerned about my machines.
The small kids next door probably already have their computers infected.

A good point, but still, technically speaking, all versions of flash 
(and newer versions of the java plugin) have some nasty new 0-days 
because of that stupid italian ``hacking team'' that recently themselves 
got hacked. Still, with good browsing habits and a bit of common sense, 
most power users should be fine.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-14 Thread A Williams

John Duncan wrote:

rjkrjk wrote:

follow the link to adobe, and d/l current version 1800 209



Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 7/14/2015 12:27 AM:

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use
with caution yesterday
and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.

Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons
manager under the Tools
menu and clicked on Check to see if your plugins are up to date
which takes me to
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that
all versions of Adobe's
Flash Player are currently vulnerable.

BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has
been blocked by
Seamonkey because it is outdated?

Thanks,
Paul.


https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-04.html

How safe?  That's relative to YOUR browsing habits and computer
knowledge.
I am not the least bit concerned about my machines.
The small kids next door probably already have their computers infected.


A good point, but still, technically speaking, all versions of flash
(and newer versions of the java plugin) have some nasty new 0-days
because of that stupid italian ``hacking team'' that recently themselves
got hacked. Still, with good browsing habits and a bit of common sense,
most power users should be fine.


In this context, the Italian Hacking Job was a good thing.  The Italians 
were already using the exploit and now everybody is aware of it.  I read 
just now that the count of flaws in Flash found so far this month is 
up to 38.  Finally people are thinking of killing the beast.


Was the message really Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution?
That would imply it was simply complaining about an older version.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-14 Thread Mason83
On 14/07/2015 18:40, A Williams wrote:

 In this context, the Italian Hacking Job was a good thing.  The Italians 
 were already using the exploit and now everybody is aware of it.  I read 
 just now that the count of flaws in Flash found so far this month is 
 up to 38.  Finally people are thinking of killing the beast.

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/07/14/1413221/new-default-mozilla-temporarily-disables-flash-in-firefox
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/07/14/0112229/facebooks-new-chief-security-officer-wants-to-set-a-date-to-kill-flash

 Was the message really Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution?
 That would imply it was simply complaining about an older version.

venerable = vulnerable  ;-)

Regards.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-14 Thread Paul Bergsagel

A Williams wrote:

John Duncan wrote:

rjkrjk wrote:

follow the link to adobe, and d/l current version 1800 209



Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 7/14/2015 12:27 AM:

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use
with caution yesterday
and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.

Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons
manager under the Tools
menu and clicked on Check to see if your plugins are up to date
which takes me to
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that
all versions of Adobe's
Flash Player are currently vulnerable.

BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has
been blocked by
Seamonkey because it is outdated?

Thanks,
Paul.


https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-04.html

How safe?  That's relative to YOUR browsing habits and computer
knowledge.
I am not the least bit concerned about my machines.
The small kids next door probably already have their computers
infected.


A good point, but still, technically speaking, all versions of flash
(and newer versions of the java plugin) have some nasty new 0-days
because of that stupid italian ``hacking team'' that recently themselves
got hacked. Still, with good browsing habits and a bit of common sense,
most power users should be fine.


In this context, the Italian Hacking Job was a good thing.  The Italians
were already using the exploit and now everybody is aware of it.  I read
just now that the count of flaws in Flash found so far this month is
up to 38.  Finally people are thinking of killing the beast.

Was the message really Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution?
That would imply it was simply complaining about an older version.
I had the latest Flash version when I received the message: Shockwave 
Flash is venerable. Use with caution, which is the exact wording of the 
message. Mozilla was not complaining about an older version, but the 
latest version I had downloaded a few minutes earlier.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-14 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

A Williams wrote:


Was the message really Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with
caution? That would imply it was simply complaining about an older
version.


No, that's not what venerable means:

accorded a great deal of respect, especially because of age, wisdom, or 
character, e.g., a venerable statesman


synonyms: respected, venerated, revered, honored, esteemed, hallowed, 
august, distinguished, eminent, great, grand


Still, probably not the intended word. I blame autocorrupt.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Flash plug-in

2015-07-13 Thread Paul Bergsagel
I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with 
caution yesterday and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.


Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons 
manager under the Tools menu and clicked on Check to see if your 
plugins are up to date which takes me to 
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that all 
versions of Adobe's Flash Player are currently vulnerable.


BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has 
been blocked by Seamonkey because it is outdated?


Thanks,
Paul.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in

2015-07-13 Thread Paul in Houston, TX

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I got the message in SeaMonkey Shockwave Flash is venerable. Use with caution 
yesterday
and updated to the latest up to date flash plug-in.

Today I get the same warning about flash. I clicked on the add-ons manager 
under the Tools
menu and clicked on Check to see if your plugins are up to date which takes 
me to
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/  only to inform me that all versions 
of Adobe's
Flash Player are currently vulnerable.

BTW I am using MacOS X. How safe is it to activate flash when it has been 
blocked by
Seamonkey because it is outdated?

Thanks,
Paul.


https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-04.html

How safe?  That's relative to YOUR browsing habits and computer knowledge.
I am not the least bit concerned about my machines.
The small kids next door probably already have their computers infected.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-14 Thread Ed Mullen

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 7:36 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash
plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes
one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some
time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through
all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video
(there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel --
it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it
does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html


Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should
the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to
ask for it?



Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that
needs frequent updating.  Is that unreasonable?

Jesus!  Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel.


This isn't an Adobe support site, it's a SeaMonkey support site. The OP
came here because _Mozilla's_ plugin check was so unfriendly he couldn't
figure out how to update the plugin. So for us here at
mozilla.support.seamonkey the issue is Mozilla's unfriendly plugin
check. That's something we should fix.



I was referring to:


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


The link provided requires much more work to find what is needed than 
the direct one I provided.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Remember, amateurs built the ark, professionals built the Titanic.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-14 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 7:36 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash
plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes
one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some
time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I
assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html

or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through
all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video
(there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel --
it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it
does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html


Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't.
Should
the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come
here to
ask for it?



Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that
needs frequent updating.  Is that unreasonable?

Jesus!  Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel.


This isn't an Adobe support site, it's a SeaMonkey support site. The OP
came here because _Mozilla's_ plugin check was so unfriendly he couldn't
figure out how to update the plugin. So for us here at
mozilla.support.seamonkey the issue is Mozilla's unfriendly plugin
check. That's something we should fix.



I was referring to:


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


The link provided requires much more work to find what is needed than
the direct one I provided.


Agreed. This is the link provided by our plugin check, and it does 
require too much work to find what is needed. That should be fixed.


By mentioning it in my reply, I was merely demonstrating that I 
understood and could replicate the OP's user experience. I was not 
advocating this circuitous route as the ideal solution that should be 
foisted off on all users. But you're right that I sounded too accepting 
of the status quo and resigned to its permanence.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-14 Thread Ed Mullen

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/14/2014 12:28 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 7:36 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash
plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes
one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some
time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I
assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html


or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download
center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through
all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video
(there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel --
it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it
does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html


Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't.
Should
the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come
here to
ask for it?



Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that
needs frequent updating.  Is that unreasonable?

Jesus!  Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel.


This isn't an Adobe support site, it's a SeaMonkey support site. The OP
came here because _Mozilla's_ plugin check was so unfriendly he couldn't
figure out how to update the plugin. So for us here at
mozilla.support.seamonkey the issue is Mozilla's unfriendly plugin
check. That's something we should fix.



I was referring to:


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


The link provided requires much more work to find what is needed than
the direct one I provided.


Agreed. This is the link provided by our plugin check, and it does
require too much work to find what is needed. That should be fixed.

By mentioning it in my reply, I was merely demonstrating that I
understood and could replicate the OP's user experience. I was not
advocating this circuitous route as the ideal solution that should be
foisted off on all users. But you're right that I sounded too accepting
of the status quo and resigned to its permanence.



;-)

I certainly agree with you that the Mozilla plug-in check is messed up.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
I hate sex in the movies. The seat folded up, the drink spilled and that 
ice really chilled the mood.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-14 Thread NoOp
On 12/14/2014 09:35 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
 Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/14/2014 12:28 PM:
 Ed Mullen wrote:
 Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 7:36 PM:
 Ed Mullen wrote:
 Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM:
 Ed Mullen wrote:
 Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:
 Miles Fidelman wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash
 plug-in if
 it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes
 one to
 a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:

 You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some
 time.

 1. How does one update it?, or

 If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I
 assume
 you're referring to
 http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html


 or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download
 center.
 Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through
 all
 the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
 Download Center near the bottom.

 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video
 (there is
 no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
 extensions).

 (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)

 On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel --
 it's
 not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it
 does
 generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
 https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315


 Why not go directly there?

 https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html

 Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't.
 Should
 the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come
 here to
 ask for it?


 Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that
 needs frequent updating.  Is that unreasonable?

 Jesus!  Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel.

 This isn't an Adobe support site, it's a SeaMonkey support site. The OP
 came here because _Mozilla's_ plugin check was so unfriendly he couldn't
 figure out how to update the plugin. So for us here at
 mozilla.support.seamonkey the issue is Mozilla's unfriendly plugin
 check. That's something we should fix.


 I was referring to:

 1. How does one update it?, or

 If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
 you're referring to
 http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
 or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
 Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
 the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
 Download Center near the bottom.

 The link provided requires much more work to find what is needed than
 the direct one I provided.

 Agreed. This is the link provided by our plugin check, and it does
 require too much work to find what is needed. That should be fixed.

 By mentioning it in my reply, I was merely demonstrating that I
 understood and could replicate the OP's user experience. I was not
 advocating this circuitous route as the ideal solution that should be
 foisted off on all users. But you're right that I sounded too accepting
 of the status quo and resigned to its permanence.

 
 ;-)
 
 I certainly agree with you that the Mozilla plug-in check is messed up.
 

Usually I have a problem with the Plugin check page - particulary with
Adobe Flash  linux. Today when checking the page works fine.. it
actually shows the correct version  status. When clicking the the
action button, it takes me directly to:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/.
  Just checked on a Windows machine with an outdated Adobe Flash  the
action link takes me to the same URL: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-14 Thread pjdkrunkt
Mozilla's plugin-check page is updated manually and is *never* up-to-date.  In 
fact, it generally considers many ancient versions of plugins to be current and 
occasionally it will even say that brand new versions are out-of-date.  The 
plan was to convince the various plugins developers to adopt a system of 
notifications that all browsers could use to keep their plugins up-to-date.  
This likely was never considered because Google's answer was to simply bundle 
important plugins into Chrome, thus circumventing the whole mess.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in? - SOLVED

2014-12-13 Thread Miles Fidelman

Thanks Paul!

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume 
you're referring to 
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html 
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. 
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through 
all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player 
Download Center near the bottom.



2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- 
it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though 
it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:

https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315




--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-13 Thread Ed Mullen

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. And 
tomorrow isn't looking good either.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-13 Thread EE

Miles Fidelman wrote:

Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:

1. How does one update it?, or
2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)

Help!

Thanks,

Miles Fidelman

You can install a new version of Flash and it will simply replace the 
old plugin in Mac OS.  I get my Flash plugin from here:

http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-13 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html


Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should 
the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to 
ask for it?


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-13 Thread Ed Mullen

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes
one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html


Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should
the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to
ask for it?



Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that 
needs frequent updating.  Is that unreasonable?


Jesus!  Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
And don't start a sentence with a conjunction.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-13 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 2:19 PM:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/13/2014 1:18 AM:

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes
one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume
you're referring to
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center.
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player
Download Center near the bottom.


2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it
does
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315



Why not go directly there?

https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html


Yes, I agree the plugins check should link there, but it doesn't. Should
the user have to bookmark or memorize that link instead, or come here to
ask for it?



Fer God's sake, the user should bookmark the link to the add-on that
needs frequent updating.  Is that unreasonable?

Jesus!  Just save the frigging link instead of re-inventing the wheel.


This isn't an Adobe support site, it's a SeaMonkey support site. The OP 
came here because _Mozilla's_ plugin check was so unfriendly he couldn't 
figure out how to update the plugin. So for us here at 
mozilla.support.seamonkey the issue is Mozilla's unfriendly plugin 
check. That's something we should fix.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-12 Thread Miles Fidelman

Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if 
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes one to 
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


1. How does one update it?, or
2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is 
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for 
extensions).


(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)

Help!

Thanks,

Miles Fidelman

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Miles Fidelman wrote:


Hi Folks,

So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if
it's older than a certain version.  But.. the update button takes one to
a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions:


You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time.


1. How does one update it?, or


If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume 
you're referring to 
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html 
or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. 
Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all 
the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player 
Download Center near the bottom.



2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is
no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for
extensions).

(Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh)


On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's 
not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does 
generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here:

https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-23 Thread EE

Trane Francks wrote:

On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

EE wrote:

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.


Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or Mavericks
(OSX.9.x).

Snow Leopard (OSX.6.8) is mostly 32 Bit; Leopard (OSX.5) is all 32 Bit
and any lower are all 32bit.  It took a Long time for apple to adopt 64
Bit.


Not in my experience. SeaMonkey 2.x always ran as 64-bit on my Snow
Leopard system.

My Snow Leopard is 64-bit because it was installed on a 64-bit Mac Pro. 
 I checked the System Profiler, and SeaMonkey 2.23 is indeed 64-bit.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-23 Thread PhillipJones

Trane Francks wrote:

On 12/23/13 11:40 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

Trane Francks wrote:

On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

EE wrote:

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The
windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.


Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or Mavericks
(OSX.9.x).

Snow Leopard (OSX.6.8) is mostly 32 Bit; Leopard (OSX.5) is all 32 Bit
and any lower are all 32bit.  It took a Long time for apple to adopt 64
Bit.


Not in my experience. SeaMonkey 2.x always ran as 64-bit on my Snow
Leopard system.


Go SeaMonkey do get info (⌘-I)
Check and see if set to 32 bit

http://sharebucketapp.com/cxZjNhZWRmOGMwOWRmZg


The more telling way is to open Activity Monitor and look at SeaMonkey
in the process list. I've since upgraded from SL to Lion, so cannot
check current builds for 64-bit execution.

It only been since Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x) that the system is even full 
time 64Bit and if if you still have enough 32 bit program They often 
work better if you system system apps to 32 Bit and restart for them to 
work as they should. Unlike on a PC where a 32 Bit program works great 
on on 32 bit system or 64 bit system. It does make a difference on a Mac.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-22 Thread EE

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-22 Thread PhillipJones

EE wrote:

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.

Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or Mavericks 
(OSX.9.x).


Snow Leopard (OSX.6.8) is mostly 32 Bit; Leopard (OSX.5) is all 32 Bit 
and any lower are all 32bit.  It took a Long time for apple to adopt 64 
Bit.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-22 Thread Trane Francks

On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

EE wrote:

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.


Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or Mavericks
(OSX.9.x).

Snow Leopard (OSX.6.8) is mostly 32 Bit; Leopard (OSX.5) is all 32 Bit
and any lower are all 32bit.  It took a Long time for apple to adopt 64
Bit.

Not in my experience. SeaMonkey 2.x always ran as 64-bit on my Snow 
Leopard system.


--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-22 Thread PhillipJones

Trane Francks wrote:

On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

EE wrote:

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.


Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or Mavericks
(OSX.9.x).

Snow Leopard (OSX.6.8) is mostly 32 Bit; Leopard (OSX.5) is all 32 Bit
and any lower are all 32bit.  It took a Long time for apple to adopt 64
Bit.


Not in my experience. SeaMonkey 2.x always ran as 64-bit on my Snow
Leopard system.


Go SeaMonkey do get info (⌘-I)
Check and see if set to 32 bit

http://sharebucketapp.com/cxZjNhZWRmOGMwOWRmZg

--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-22 Thread Trane Francks

On 12/23/13 11:40 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

Trane Francks wrote:

On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:

EE wrote:

regz91 wrote:


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.


64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.


Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or Mavericks
(OSX.9.x).

Snow Leopard (OSX.6.8) is mostly 32 Bit; Leopard (OSX.5) is all 32 Bit
and any lower are all 32bit.  It took a Long time for apple to adopt 64
Bit.


Not in my experience. SeaMonkey 2.x always ran as 64-bit on my Snow
Leopard system.


Go SeaMonkey do get info (⌘-I)
Check and see if set to 32 bit

http://sharebucketapp.com/cxZjNhZWRmOGMwOWRmZg

The more telling way is to open Activity Monitor and look at SeaMonkey 
in the process list. I've since upgraded from SL to Lion, so cannot 
check current builds for 64-bit execution.


--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-20 Thread chicagofan
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and 
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.


So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla 
page to click update now again  and that one results in a page 
that appears to say... to use that update I must install McAfee which I 
will not do.


So what are my options to display these tests using SeaMonkey?  :(
bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-20 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
 Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and 
 I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
 
 So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla 
 page to click update now again  and that one results in a page 
 that appears to say... to use that update I must install McAfee which I 
 will not do.
 
 So what are my options to display these tests using SeaMonkey?  :(
 bj
 

Go directly to the sources for both Flash and Java.

For Flash, go to
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html.  Be sure
to select the second set for Plugin-based browsers and NOT the first
set for Internet Explorer.

For Java, go to http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp.  Since you
seem to be using an x64 Windows, select the 64-bit Windows version for
downloading.

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Where does your elected official stand?  Which
politicians refuse to tell us where they stand?
See the non-partisan Project Vote Smart at
http://votesmart.org/.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-20 Thread chicagofan

David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:

Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.

So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now again  and that one results in a page
that appears to say... to use that update I must install McAfee which I
will not do.

So what are my options to display these tests using SeaMonkey?  :(
bj


Go directly to the sources for both Flash and Java.

For Flash, go to
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html.  Be sure
to select the second set for Plugin-based browsers and NOT the first
set for Internet Explorer.

For Java, go to http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp.  Since you
seem to be using an x64 Windows, select the 64-bit Windows version for
downloading.



For Flash - MSI Installer or .EXE Installer?

Thanks, David!
bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-20 Thread Larry S.

David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:

Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.

So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now again  and that one results in a page
that appears to say... to use that update I must install McAfee which I
will not do.

So what are my options to display these tests using SeaMonkey?  :(
bj



Go directly to the sources for both Flash and Java.

For Flash, go to
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html.  Be sure
to select the second set for Plugin-based browsers and NOT the first
set for Internet Explorer.

For Java, go to http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp.  Since you
seem to be using an x64 Windows, select the 64-bit Windows version for
downloading.

The Java site says We have detected you may be viewing this page in a 
32-bit browser. Hmm, thought that's what SM was. So, which one? Or both?


Grateful for help to this non-tech.

Larry S.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-20 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/20/2013 4:47 PM, chicagofan wrote:
 David E. Ross wrote:
 On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
 Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
 I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.

 So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
 page to click update now again  and that one results in a page
 that appears to say... to use that update I must install McAfee which I
 will not do.

 So what are my options to display these tests using SeaMonkey?  :(
 bj

 Go directly to the sources for both Flash and Java.

 For Flash, go to
 http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html.  Be sure
 to select the second set for Plugin-based browsers and NOT the first
 set for Internet Explorer.

 For Java, go to http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp.  Since you
 seem to be using an x64 Windows, select the 64-bit Windows version for
 downloading.

 
 For Flash - MSI Installer or .EXE Installer?
 
 Thanks, David!
 bj
 

With Windows 7, I don't think it makes a difference.  I generally choose
the .exe file.


-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Where does your elected official stand?  Which
politicians refuse to tell us where they stand?
See the non-partisan Project Vote Smart at
http://votesmart.org/.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Flash plug in problem/question

2013-12-20 Thread regz91

Larry S. wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:

Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.

So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now again  and that one results in a page
that appears to say... to use that update I must install McAfee which I
will not do.

So what are my options to display these tests using SeaMonkey?  :(
bj



Go directly to the sources for both Flash and Java.

For Flash, go to
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html.  Be sure
to select the second set for Plugin-based browsers and NOT the first
set for Internet Explorer.

For Java, go to http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp.  Since you
seem to be using an x64 Windows, select the 64-bit Windows version for
downloading.


The Java site says We have detected you may be viewing this page in a
32-bit browser. Hmm, thought that's what SM was. So, which one? Or both?

Grateful for help to this non-tech.

Larry S.


I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows 
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the 
OS is 32 or 64 bit.

--
Version 3.10.2
openSUSE 13.1 (Bottle) (x86_64) 64-bit
Kernel Linux 3.11.6-4-desktop
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in not really disabled?

2013-07-13 Thread Rob
Desiree melel...@medscape.com wrote:
 On 7/7/2013 7:59 AM, Dan B. wrote:
 Does the Flash plug-in bypass SeaMonkey's disabling of it?

 I have disabled the Flash plug-in (in the configuration page at
 about:addons), and when I go to a page like
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW2poUfJ34, SeaMonkey first says

 This plugin is disabled
Manage plugins

 but then a second later the video starts playing anyway.


 Thanks,
 Daniel

 Isn't it wonderful that now we don't generally need Flash at Youtube? 
 Better experience with HTML5 anyway.

I don't agree with that!
My experience is much better with Flash video on Youtube in Seamonkey.

For example, video can be displayed fullscreen (instead of only full
window), and it continues smoothly when the size is changed.

HTML5 needs a lot of work.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in not really disabled?

2013-07-10 Thread A Williams

Dan B. wrote:

Does the Flash plug-in bypass SeaMonkey's disabling of it?

I have disabled the Flash plug-in (in the configuration page at
about:addons), and when I go to a page like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW2poUfJ34, SeaMonkey first says

This plugin is disabled
   Manage plugins

but then a second later the video starts playing anyway.


Thanks,
Daniel


 I don't have Flash installed at all.
Browsing Youtube (for instance) I frequently get the message that I need 
Flash, about 60% of the time the video plays anyway.  Before html5 I did 
not even bother going there because nothing would play.

Philip Taylor is right.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in not really disabled?

2013-07-10 Thread Desiree

On 7/7/2013 7:59 AM, Dan B. wrote:

Does the Flash plug-in bypass SeaMonkey's disabling of it?

I have disabled the Flash plug-in (in the configuration page at
about:addons), and when I go to a page like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW2poUfJ34, SeaMonkey first says

This plugin is disabled
   Manage plugins

but then a second later the video starts playing anyway.


Thanks,
Daniel

Isn't it wonderful that now we don't generally need Flash at Youtube? 
Better experience with HTML5 anyway.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Flash plug-in not really disabled?

2013-07-07 Thread Dan B.

Does the Flash plug-in bypass SeaMonkey's disabling of it?

I have disabled the Flash plug-in (in the configuration page at
about:addons), and when I go to a page like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW2poUfJ34, SeaMonkey first says

   This plugin is disabled
  Manage plugins

but then a second later the video starts playing anyway.


Thanks,
Daniel

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in not really disabled?

2013-07-07 Thread Philip Taylor


Dan B. wrote:
 Does the Flash plug-in bypass SeaMonkey's disabling of it?
 
 I have disabled the Flash plug-in (in the configuration page at
 about:addons), and when I go to a page like
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW2poUfJ34, SeaMonkey first says
 
This plugin is disabled
   Manage plugins
 
 but then a second later the video starts playing anyway.

HTML 5 video as fallback ?
Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Flash plug-in (stop and start animation)

2011-01-05 Thread Gerry Hickman

Hi,

I used to run SM without Flash and it was great not to have the annoying 
animations. (I used IE for the odd video).


Recently I wanted to test Windows 7 without IE (in theory it's possible 
to uninstall IE from Windows 7), so I installed the Flash plug-in for 
SM, which works well.


The problem is, I with I could just have placeholders for the Flash 
animations, and that they would only start when I tell them to.


In the old days, you can press escape to stop animated GIFs, but this 
doesn't seem to work with Flash...


--
Gerry Hickman (London UK)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash plug-in (stop and start animation)

2011-01-05 Thread Philip Chee
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:16:25 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:

 Go to http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ and get the FlashBlock extension.
  With FlashBlock enabled, Flash presentations will be replaced by an
 icon that is a lower-case f in a circle.  If you move your cursor over
 the Flash area, the icon changes to a right-pointing triangle.
 Left-click in that area to see the Flash presentation.  Right-click in
 that area to get a pull-down context menu that will remove the area and
 icon.

In the latest unstable builds, if you are on OSX the place holders are
more modernistic squarish graphics contributed by the Camino team.
(Camino ships with Flashblock built in). Apparently this more closely
matches the style used by Flashblocker like extensions for Safari and
Chromium on Macs.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey