Re[2]: Prohibit Attachments?
Hello Ming-Li, Thursday, December 5, 2002, 5:44:54 PM, you wrote: ML Ah-ha, the error message prompted to check Network ML Administration under the Options menu. Under the Privileges ML pane, if an account is defined as a user (rather than an ML administrator), his/her ability to send attachment can be ML disabled. Thanks Guys, the 'problem' was in Network and Administration I had the account set up as a Dial Up Networking Connection. With no connection active all the privilege check boxes were cleared, but as soon as a dial up connection was active the check boxes were ticked! I've changed for the network type to Manual Connection and Administrator, that gets me going for now, I'll investigate further when I have a minute. I'll get the hang of this administrator thing eventually 'cos I would like to set TB up across our small network for in-house email. (no Internet access) -- Best regards, Barrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Upgrading OS, adding a drive and downloading the latest Bat.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 at 16:23:13 -0500 David R. Austen wrote: I am contemplating the following strategy: Have a new hard disk installed (it would be D:) and use that new drive as the default drive and boot XP each time. My existing software would remain on the C drive, unless and until I decide on the migration of some software. Eventually I would remove the OS from that C drive. I used similar arrangements on my machines for several years, either out of the necessity to have two systems available or as a intermediate state when upgrading. Just be careful not to delete those critical XP system files on C (in the root directory) when removing Win98. IOW, don't boot from a DOS floppy and reformat drive C (I believe you can't do that when in XP, so you're safe there). That's the only thing I don't like about this approach: WinXP (NT, 2K) needs to put some system files on drive C. It makes backing up the system a little more tricky. Are you on TBOT? Please reply there if you want to continue on this, since this is really OT. -- Best regards, Ming-Li The Bat! 1.62 Beta/17 | WinXP SP-1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Upgrading OS, adding a drive and downloading the latest Bat.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 at 16:12:24 -0600 Joseph N. wrote: DRA My existing software would remain on the C drive, unless and until DRA I decide on the migration of some software. Eventually I would DRA remove the OS from that C drive. I think that approach, while it would work, has a specific risk and misses a specific opportunity. I'm not a pro in this field, but from my user's perspective, it is best to boot a Windows machine from the C: drive. That is what the OS expects, so that is where it looks for drivers, etc. I'm no expert either, but my experience (and as I told David, I did this all the time) shows that Win NT/2k/XP don't don't foolishly assume its system to be on drive C. Especially after Win2k, it handles dual-boot system pretty well. Some APPs do make foolish assumptions, but they're getting rarer by the day, I believe. I think you'd contain your risk now and into the future, and comply with the various programmers' expectations, by doing the following: Purchase a disk ghosting/imaging software (like Norton Ghost or the main competitor, whose name I cannot recall right now); DriveImage, I believe. And there's shareware/freeware. install and format a new D: drive; defrag and scandisk your c: drive; ghost the image of the entire c: drive to the d: drive; then format the c: drive and install XP. This is good if you don't really need to go back and forth between two systems during the transition. You see, leaving Win98 as it is may be more than just keeping a safe backup plan (in case WinXP fails). The transition could take weeks, or even months, that keeping the old system as it is provides many advantages. Of course, it all depends on how you like to proceed with the upgrade. There's no one-size-fits-all answer for this, IMHO. Are you on TBOT? Please follow up there if you want to continue. -- Best regards, Ming-Li The Bat! 1.62 Beta/17 | WinXP SP-1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Error when sending mail
Hello, I'm receiving the following intermittent error when trying to send SMTP mail for immediate delivery: 06/12/2002, 15:05:42: SEND - sending mail messages - 1 messages in queue !06/12/2002, 15:05:43: SEND - Server reports it is not ready, reply: 06/12/2002, 15:05:43: SEND - connection finished - 0 messages sent 06/12/2002, 15:05:43: SEND - Some messages were not sent - check the log for details I've been running TB! in parallel with OLXP for some time and only TB! seems to suffer from (or rather report) this. Note, this occurs when OL is not running. My SMTP server is mail.cix.co.uk which I know is a bit overloaded these days, is there anything further that I can do to try and see where this problem actually lies? Yes I _am_ running Norton AV 2003, and it _is_ configured to scan outgoing mail, and I do know how redundant this is, and I _do_ want to keep using it ;-) -- Nick Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Error when sending mail
On Friday, December 6, 2002, 3:19:00 PM, Nick Dutton wrote: My SMTP server is mail.cix.co.uk which I know is a bit overloaded these days, is there anything further that I can do to try and see where this problem actually lies? I get these quite regularly during peak times (business hours), although I use Pipex. The underlying problem is a slow response from the mail server, so it is not really a TB! problem. What is a Bat! problem is the fact that you cannot increase the timeout period - the timeout in TB! is set to a shorter period than OL, and therefore timeouts more often. I also use NAV2003, but I am not aware of this contributing to the problem, because it only scans once the connection to the server has been established. Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
My comments about The Bat! a question
Hello , I have tried too many free-ware and shareware apps in regards to e-mail but The Bat! makes it whoa! again :) Would asking for a customized macro on this list be a wise idea? I do not write macros and learning The Bat! can go from snowball to avalanche at the launch of a help file. If asking for a customized macro is OK and someone was kind enough to help me out how would I know if it is actually safe to run it on my system? Thanks -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Query re use of generic email addresses
I hope some-one can tell me if this is possible. I have now been searching for a couple of weeks for an answer with no luck. Also I find understanding Macros rather difficult. I run a mailing list for a group of about 100 people which I set up about a year ago and mastered this using the examples provided in TheBat! What I would like to do now is to provide generic email addresses to about 400 contacts on a web page. I do not want their own email addresses to show on the web page. What I need is (say) for an email like [EMAIL PROTECTED] where 'thiscontact' could be 1 of about 400 and when the email is received in TB for it to be sent out 'as is' to the real recipient. I can see how to do this one at a time with a filter, but I am wondering if there is a way to avoid having to have 400 filters, so the 'thiscontact' can be looked up in the contacts address book and insert the appropriate recipient's address in the To: Any help (in simple language) would be very much appreciated. Thank you David Floyd -- ++ | David Floyd || | Bath Wells Bell-ringers | http://www.Bath-Wells.org.uk | | Bath Choral Society | http://www.bath-choral-society.org.uk | ++ Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: My comments about The Bat! a question
Hello Victor! On Friday, December 6, 2002 at 5:12:20 PM you wrote: Would asking for a customized macro on this list be a wise idea? I do not write macros and learning The Bat! can go from snowball to avalanche at the launch of a help file. The very idea of this list i to ask such questions and get answers to them. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1 Military Intelligence is a contradiction in terms. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Query re use of generic email addresses
Hello David! On Friday, December 6, 2002 at 6:00:09 PM you wrote: Any help (in simple language) would be very much appreciated. Since I am not quite sure I understood you correctly I can only give a hint that may suit you: Quick Templates used for Mass Mailing (This is a feature available from the Address Book). With MM you can customize your posts to the people on you list such that they get individual messages with only their own address anywhere in it. For an automated process one can surely utilize filters, macros and RegExs. IIRC somewhere in the FAQ is an article by Leif Gregory on how to set up a mailing list with TB. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1 When people have problems using a design, it's not because they are stupid. It's because the design is too difficult. (Jakob Nielsen) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Query re use of generic email addresses
In message of Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Dierk Haasis writes Hello David! On Friday, December 6, 2002 at 6:00:09 PM you wrote: Any help (in simple language) would be very much appreciated. Since I am not quite sure I understood you correctly I can only give a hint that may suit you: Quick Templates used for Mass Mailing (This is a feature available from the Address Book). With MM you can customize your posts to the people on you list such that they get individual messages with only their own address anywhere in it. For an automated process one can surely utilize filters, macros and RegExs. IIRC somewhere in the FAQ is an article by Leif Gregory on how to set up a mailing list with TB. Sorry, no that wasn't what I meant, I already have a mailing list up and running. What I trying to do is redirect a message that comes in to a particular person e.g. a mail comes in addressed to (say) Contact[EMAIL PROTECTED] and TB redirects it to Fred Bloggs[EMAIL PROTECTED] That can be done using filter, but there could be up to 400 different addresses involved and I am wondering if somehow Contact can be looked up in the address book as a nickname and the relevant address then added to the To: in the redirected mail, otherwise it would mean setting up 400 filters (rather cumbersome and I don't know if you could have that number of filters in one mailbox) Thanks, David Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Do I need a customized macro for this?
Hello tbudl, I collect information using forms on the web. Through CGI the users information is mailed back to me. I would like to auto-respond to them using The Bat! but heres the dilemma. My problem is the CGI script and not the actual sender is sending me the mail. I cannot auto-respond to the CGI script (No-Reply) because it would simply bounce back. I do get the users e-mail address but it is in the body of the message. Is there a macro that can scan the body of a message locate an e-mail address on a *certain line* and then direct an instant reply to that address? The reason why I wish to emphasize *certain line* is because I sometimes get more than one address per form and would not wish to violate the privacy of my users. Thank you -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Query re use of generic email addresses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 'Lo David, On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:00:09 + your time, you said: DF What I need is (say) for an email like [EMAIL PROTECTED] where DF 'thiscontact' could be 1 of about 400 and when the email is received in DF TB for it to be sent out 'as is' to the real recipient. I take it the *@xyz.org.uk address is a catchall address, and that you can't offer your list members aliases at the mail server rather than redirect via TB!? I know that isn't what you asked, but just wondered why you choose to have the messages routed via TB! and not redirected at the mail server. - -- Slán, Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk ** PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/ Faffing about with TB! v1.61 on W2K SP3 #2722. Raw Qed Luis Mrs Yo ¶ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP! Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966 iQA/AwUBPfDlostub/5cfolmEQLpjgCg8L0eEBFe2UleHKHKofeXy2RKD7UAn2E1 x5usLV1alMkywh2mqvJPc06N =K2bv -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: My comments about The Bat! a question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Victor B. Gonzalez [VBG] wrote:'
VBG Would asking for a customized macro on this list be a wise
VBG idea?
Sure. That's what the list is for. :)
VBG I do not write macros and learning The Bat! can go from
VBG snowball to avalanche at the launch of a help file.
Using macros is the same. They go from being simple to very complex.
The simple ones are just that, simple and easy to understand. You'd
be surprised at what you can do for yourself.
However, the more complex ones we're all too willing to help with.
VBG If asking for a customized macro is OK and someone was kind
VBG enough to help me out how would I know if it is actually safe
VBG to run it on my system?
Well, TB! macros since they are designed to extract and manipulate
text within your messages. Furthermore, when you ask for macros,
they're published on the list in the replies to those who make
requests.
I therefore wouldn't worry about it.
- --
-=] Allie C Martin [=- {List Moderator}
MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Win32) - GPGshell v2.65
Comment: PubKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE98OYFV8nrYCsHF+IRAn+rAJ48HfUEhp0rD7bGw4IKs76SYph2AQCcCJ03
xRYwpWw3ecgmEMMGJor6ZFc=
=Hqee
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Query re use of generic email addresses
In message of Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Simon Blake writes 'Lo David, On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:00:09 + your time, you said: DF What I need is (say) for an email like [EMAIL PROTECTED] where DF 'thiscontact' could be 1 of about 400 and when the email is received in DF TB for it to be sent out 'as is' to the real recipient. I take it the *@xyz.org.uk address is a catchall address, Yes. It' bath-wells.org.uk which is hosted at uk2.net. I just pick the mail up by POP3 from uk2.net I do have 24 hour connection (ADSL) so members wouldn't suffer a delay. Take a look at www.bath-wells.org.uk then click on one of the Branches (Axbridge, say). Each tower should have a contact, but many people are reluctant to have their email addy published on the web. If I can offer a generic form of address I can control any missuse (as I do with the bell-ringers news/mailing list). Cheers, David -- ++ | David Floyd || | Bath Wells Bell-ringers | http://www.Bath-Wells.org.uk | | Bath Choral Society | http://www.bath-choral-society.org.uk | ++ Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Do I need a customized macro for this?
Hello Victor, My problem is the CGI script and not the actual sender is sending me the mail. I cannot auto-respond to the CGI script (No-Reply) because it would simply bounce back. What CGI script are you using to send you the form data by email to you? You are probably using FormMail.pl by Matthew M. Wright, which probably is the most widely used. If you are, I'd suggest you use a better one based on Matt's, you can find it on: http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/scripts.shtml Anyway, whether you use Matt's or the one I suggest, you can easily modify it so that the From: of the message you get if the Name and e-mail address that has been entered when filling the form. I have been doing this for a couple of years now. Is there a macro that can scan the body of a message locate an e-mail address on a *certain line* and then direct an instant reply to that address? Yes, you can also do this with RegExp macros in your reply template. However, although I know it can be done, I can't tell you how because I'm not that familiar with RegExp in TB. And also, I think it is a better solution to make the changes in the FormMail script. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Do I need a customized macro for this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, December 06, 2002, Victor B. Gonzalez wrote... I collect information using forms on the web. Through CGI the users information is mailed back to me. I would like to auto-respond to them using The Bat! but heres the dilemma. My problem is the CGI script and not the actual sender is sending me the mail. I cannot auto-respond to the CGI script (No-Reply) because it would simply bounce back. Two options... 1st is not so difficult... modify the CGI script to put in the email address as part of the headers. I do get the users e-mail address but it is in the body of the message. Is there a macro that can scan the body of a message locate an e-mail address on a *certain line* and then direct an instant reply to that address? It's not a single macro you are after, but a combination of marcos and regexp (past my knowledge I'm afraid, but there are many here that could guide you). You would then need to use it in conjunction with a filter so that the filter responds to certain flags (ie headers, to, and from for example so as not to get an accidental mail), then run a QT (Quick Template), as part of the auto-responder, that has the regexp code in it to setup the headers (%TO that is), and you can then set the filter to send immediately. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPfDucCuD6BT4/R9zEQKIzQCaA+WrSdpwqnJ0srsPXskt+ONXYDEAoLB4 p2AKb0Goh8+GUbmRnuclylHl =mtz9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: My comments about The Bat! a question
Hello Allie, Thank you very much Allie for your motivation :) Your reply was warm and very appreciated :) -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Friday, December 6, 2002, 1:01:44 PM, you wrote: ACM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ACM Hash: SHA1 ACM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Victor B. Gonzalez [VBG] wrote:' VBG Would asking for a customized macro on this list be a wise VBG idea? ACM Sure. That's what the list is for. :) VBG I do not write macros and learning The Bat! can go from VBG snowball to avalanche at the launch of a help file. ACM Using macros is the same. They go from being simple to very complex. ACM The simple ones are just that, simple and easy to understand. You'd ACM be surprised at what you can do for yourself. ACM However, the more complex ones we're all too willing to help with. VBG If asking for a customized macro is OK and someone was kind VBG enough to help me out how would I know if it is actually safe VBG to run it on my system? ACM Well, TB! macros since they are designed to extract and manipulate ACM text within your messages. Furthermore, when you ask for macros, ACM they're published on the list in the replies to those who make ACM requests. ACM I therefore wouldn't worry about it. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: My comments about The Bat! a question
Hello Allie, I am sorry but I believe my last message sent to you actually got sent to the mailing list. I meant for it to be personal. Again, Thanks :) -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Friday, December 6, 2002, 1:01:44 PM, you wrote: ACM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ACM Hash: SHA1 ACM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Victor B. Gonzalez [VBG] wrote:' VBG Would asking for a customized macro on this list be a wise VBG idea? ACM Sure. That's what the list is for. :) VBG I do not write macros and learning The Bat! can go from VBG snowball to avalanche at the launch of a help file. ACM Using macros is the same. They go from being simple to very complex. ACM The simple ones are just that, simple and easy to understand. You'd ACM be surprised at what you can do for yourself. ACM However, the more complex ones we're all too willing to help with. VBG If asking for a customized macro is OK and someone was kind VBG enough to help me out how would I know if it is actually safe VBG to run it on my system? ACM Well, TB! macros since they are designed to extract and manipulate ACM text within your messages. Furthermore, when you ask for macros, ACM they're published on the list in the replies to those who make ACM requests. ACM I therefore wouldn't worry about it. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Do I need a customized macro for this?
Hello Miguel, Thank you for your insight about my question regarding CGI and how to best respond to it. Actually I am using a form handler. It is a CGI-script but I have no control over customizing it. When you mentioned RegExp, is that a feature of The Bat! I went crazy looking for it on the web (I thought it was a plug-in) but found a reference to it in The Bat! help files. Is that the RegExp you're talking about? Thank you very much for your time Miguel and Happy Holidays :) -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Friday, December 6, 2002, 1:32:40 PM, you wrote: MAU Hello Victor, My problem is the CGI script and not the actual sender is sending me the mail. I cannot auto-respond to the CGI script (No-Reply) because it would simply bounce back. MAU What CGI script are you using to send you the form data by email to MAU you? You are probably using FormMail.pl by Matthew M. Wright, which MAU probably is the most widely used. If you are, I'd suggest you use a MAU better one based on Matt's, you can find it on: MAUhttp://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/scripts.shtml MAU Anyway, whether you use Matt's or the one I suggest, you can easily MAU modify it so that the From: of the message you get if the Name and MAU e-mail address that has been entered when filling the form. I have MAU been doing this for a couple of years now. Is there a macro that can scan the body of a message locate an e-mail address on a *certain line* and then direct an instant reply to that address? MAU Yes, you can also do this with RegExp macros in your reply template. MAU However, although I know it can be done, I can't tell you how because MAU I'm not that familiar with RegExp in TB. And also, I think it is a MAU better solution to make the changes in the FormMail script. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Do I need a customized macro for this?
Hi Victor, on Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:38:37 -0500GMT (06.12.02, 21:38 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : VBG From: Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Miguel, that's your address. What are you up to? ;-) Or did some Victor fake it? -- Cheers Peter Live simply so that others may simply live. Mohandas Gandhi Winamp currently playing: Strawbs - Sad Young Man Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Macro for PGP sign and crypt
Hello ! I've just read the pro-privacy.de howto about The Bat and PGP. It's a great job and thanks to him, I'm almost set... Now, I looking for some more informations about macros and PGP. I mean, in the howto, it says that there is a way with macro to crypt or sign a mail message automatically... Is there a tutorial about that ? I don't know how can I do that... In fact I want to sign only some messages to some special dest. Is is possible ? -- Cedric - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DH/DSS)PGP-key Server ID: 0xBDD6E604 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Do I need a customized macro for this?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:'
PM that's your address. What are you up to? ;-)
PM Or did some Victor fake it?
It happened when he replied to my message as well. My address
appeared in his message From header.
I think his template is incorrectly configured and I've already
indicated this to him.
--
-=] Allie C Martin [=- {List Moderator}
MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Macro for PGP sign and crypt
Hello Cedric! On Friday, December 6, 2002 at 10:12:34 PM you wrote: I mean, in the howto, it says that there is a way with macro to crypt or sign a mail message automatically... There are numerous ways to achieve automated signing and encrypting. One way would be to enable in PGP preferences both options (Always sign ... and Always encrypt ...). To not sign/encrypt every message you then put the %NOUSEPGP macro into your templates. that's how I avoid signing on these mailing lists. You could also do it the other way round and use %SIGNCOMPLETE or %ENCRYPTCOMPLETE in templates - a much more tedious way. BTW, as for encryption the addressee needs to have his PGP key, it would just be an annoyance if you enable Always encrypt ...; messages to folks without a key wouldn't be encrypted but you would be asked to choose the key from the list or a server. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1 Assumptions are the mother of all screw ups. (Derek Leveret) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Macro for PGP sign and crypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Cedric, on Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:12:34 -0500GMT (06.12.02, 22:12 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CF I've just read the pro-privacy.de howto about The Bat and PGP. CF ...some more informations about macros and PGP. With The Bat!, it is easy with the PGP 6.5.8 (ckt) versions, as there are plugins available. Same with GnuPG Nullify release. CF In fact I want to sign only some messages to some special dest. Is is CF possible ? Sure. I'll hit ctrl + shift + S on this message to sign it. That's all you need within TB!. :) - -- Cheers Peter Everybody repeat after me.We are all individuals. Winamp currently playing: Billie Holiday - Strange Fruit ° -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows 98) Comment: *GnuPG signed for better authentication* iD8DBQE98RjmAzZSBuEHdM4RAnqjAJ9asmWQ1Q+E4YQ9VZtYvuqc8i0ipgCg85yR sAYZvv3OXmpyuGSvn7VDOSE= =Enil -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: My comments about The Bat! a question
* Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ something ] , | Change name Allie C. Martin to Victor B. Gonzalez? (y or n) n | Make Victor B. Gonzalez an alternate for Allie C. Martin? (y or n) n ` Huh? What was that? Ah, I see... | From: Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ Victor, seems like there is something wrong with your mail address or your TB! templates. -- Best regards, Carsten Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Import EML and/or MSG
Hallo Eddie, On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 22:08:29 +0100GMT (6-12-02, 22:08 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: EC Need to try something therefor I must Import some eMails from TB! EC to MS Outlook. So I guess I must first export it in EML or MSG EC File format. Export to .eml Import those in OE It should be possible to get them from OE to Outlook -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Too many messages to reply to about my headers
Hello tbudl, I apologize for any mix-ups but I check my from and to twice before I send mail. Two times I tried sending personal messages but they've somehow made there way into the UDL. I too do not know what's wrong and after double checking everything I can not see what's wrong. I never replied sooner because I was out and when I got back, noticed everyone was talking about me. Is anything wrong with this message? If not theres got to be something wrong only (so far) when I try personally replying to someone. Thank you all for your patience and understanding. -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC
Hello tbudl, I am on my 4th days trial with The Bat! and everything about it is amazing except for this. The Bat! slows my entire PC down from out of no where. It doesn't freeze exactly, it *slows* it down incredibly but from here on I will refer to it as a freeze. For example in the last 4 days I would leave my PC only to come back and have to shut it down hard. The Bat! makes the entire system practically unresponsive. At first I had The Bat! in Workstation with TCP/IP mode and trying to hide the Display Connection Centre would *freeze* the system (hard boot). The fix for the above was not to hide the Display Connection Centre. The problem then would be it somehow would *freeze* up again (hard boot) leaving me no choice but to fetch my mail using another client because trying to fetch mail with The Bat! again would *freeze* it up again. I tried putting The Bat! into TCP/IP or Dial-out Server mode and now I can hide the Display Connection Centre without *freezing* the entire system. The problem is the entire system *freezes* up again (I do not know why or how) leaving me no choice but to fetch my mail using another client. Then I can use The Bat! again. I think theres something wrong with The Bat! in fetching my mail. At some point it *freezes* leaving me no choice but to hard boot. Once back up again I can launch The Bat! but can not fetch mail without *freezing* the system. If once I boot back up I fetch mail with my other mail client then and only then can I get back into using The Bat! Does anyone have an idea? I would be greatly appreciative to any idea or solution that doesn't hinder it's performance. Thank you -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC
In reply to Victor's message 'The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC' on Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:31:36 -0500 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Victor, VBG Does anyone have an idea? I would be greatly appreciative to any VBG idea or solution that doesn't hinder it's performance. The only thing I could think of - admittedly not really like what you describe, but the only thing that comes to mind - is the animated bat icon in the taskbar when you have un-read mail. It has, at times, had bad habits of causing Explorer to use 90% of the processor, the solution was to disable the animated icon (first page of Options - Preferences). I'm not sure TB! still has this abnormality, as I disabled the animation, and prefer it that way. But its worth trying... I'm sure its something simple. :) -- dan. e [EMAIL PROTECTED] w http://www.danhirning.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC
Hello Daniel, Saturday, December 7, 2002, 12:42:30 AM, you wrote: VBG Does anyone have an idea? I would be greatly appreciative to any VBG idea or solution that doesn't hinder it's performance. DH The only thing I could think of - admittedly not really like what you DH describe, but the only thing that comes to mind - is the animated bat DH icon Thank you, any ideas are greatly appreciated and I have turned it off. Thanks again! Happy Holidays! -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
