Re[2]: Anti-virus plugins

2002-01-02 Thread John Rainer

Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 12:19:27 AM, you wrote:

ACM @ 19:05:47 + [ Tue, 1 Jan 2002], John Rainer [JR] thoughtfully
ACM wrote the following:
ACM ...
JR Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002
JR and the loss of the autodelete function for infected mail after
JR moving from 2001)

ACM I'm a PC-Cillin user, and this new system I got came with NAV 2002
ACM installed.. I've been using it and have so far had one bad experience.
ACM I disable the mail checker since I use the system monitor. However, it
ACM would appear that it stakes out the temp folder and will alert you of
ACM virus or virus-like presence in the temp folder. No problem. However,
ACM TB! was in the process of downloading an infected message and as soon
ACM as NAV2002 detected it in the temp folder it alerted me but this
ACM process somehow prevents TB! from completing the download and deletion
ACM from the server. As a result of this, TB! kept attempting the download
ACM until I had to manually delete the offending message from the server.

ACM This I find annoying. PC-Cillin never did or caused this.

This is more or less what I found - 2001 deleted attachments before
they were actually received by the mail client by redirecting incoming
mail through a local server arrangement. In 2002, what seems to happen
is a forced scan of the mail as it is handled by the client, which not
only picks up infected mail but also tmp files as they are created. It
then says it found two infected files but can only find one of them
(as the tmp file has gone), that they cannot be repaired and that
after deletion of one file there is still infected mail present,
presumably because it can't find the previously infected tmp file.
It does go on, though, to complete the mail download - at least, it
did for me.

None of this can be automated so if you receive a series of badtrans,
it gets very tedious. 2001, on the other hand, works fine, fully
automatic and adding txt attachments to say what virus was in the
deleted attachment. There is a slight drawback from 2002 in that it
doesn't scan outging mail, which I can live without anyway.

John


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2002-01-02 Thread Dwight A Corrin

On 28 Dec 2001, 10:47:54 AM, John Rainer wrote:

 The email scanner in 2002 works in a very different way to earlier
 versions and needs no email client configuration. The only automatic
 function seems to be autorepair, which pops up a dialog on every
 infected mail (infuriating) as it can't repair it, plus it picks up
 the tmp file created by the bat, presumably because the mail is
 intercepted in a different way from 2000/2001. To make things worse,
 what's left of any infected mail has most of its headers removed.
 I've heard that 2001 can be got to work in XP, so I might give it a
 try - that worked fine in Windows 2000.

I just received a message with a virus which was detected by NAV 2002.
While it didn't give me a choice to delete, the easy option was to hit
the quarantine button, which I did. The virus got quarantined, the
rest of the mail got collected, and I was able to locate the message
which had had the infected attachment. (I sent to the sender asking
that I be removed from the resident Outlook Express address book and
suggested that the machine be checked for infection. I sent a copy of
the message to the postmaster of the ISP in question and to abuse@
that address as well. The message to 'postmaster' bounced because her
mailbox was over quota!!)

Anyhow, my point is that NAV 2002 seemed to me to have behaved quite
adequately.

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706  fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.54/Abacus on Windows NT version 5,1



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Anti-virus plugins

2002-01-02 Thread John Rainer

Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 11:24:09 PM, you wrote:

DAC On 28 Dec 2001, 10:47:54 AM, John Rainer wrote:

 The email scanner in 2002 works in a very different way to earlier
 versions and needs no email client configuration. The only automatic
 function seems to be autorepair, which pops up a dialog on every
 infected mail (infuriating) as it can't repair it, plus it picks up
 the tmp file created by the bat, presumably because the mail is
 intercepted in a different way from 2000/2001. To make things worse,
 what's left of any infected mail has most of its headers removed.
 I've heard that 2001 can be got to work in XP, so I might give it a
 try - that worked fine in Windows 2000.

DAC I just received a message with a virus which was detected by NAV 2002.
DAC While it didn't give me a choice to delete, the easy option was to hit
DAC the quarantine button, which I did. The virus got quarantined, the
DAC rest of the mail got collected, and I was able to locate the message
DAC which had had the infected attachment. (I sent to the sender asking
DAC that I be removed from the resident Outlook Express address book and
DAC suggested that the machine be checked for infection. I sent a copy of
DAC the message to the postmaster of the ISP in question and to abuse@
DAC that address as well. The message to 'postmaster' bounced because her
DAC mailbox was over quota!!)

DAC Anyhow, my point is that NAV 2002 seemed to me to have behaved quite
DAC adequately.

Fine for you but not for me, especially after using earlier versions.
I'm not denying 2002 works - it does, but the way it works is not as
convenient for me as in 2000 and 2001. If you opt for quarantine
instead of repair, you still have to hit a button to quarantine the
mail otherwise your mail download stops, and after the fifth one, this
gets a bit tedious and after the twentieth infuriating. I was getting
40 badtrans a day when it first came out and others were getting many
more. You then have to look at all the stuff in quarantine and
manually delete it. Having used 2000 and 2001, where there is a
dialog-free delete option as first choice for infected mail, not a
last ditch alternative after going through repair and/or quarantine
dialog, this was a step backward, imho.

In 2001, infected attachments can be deleted automatically with no
intervention by me and mail downloads proceed uninterrupted without me
having to be at my desktop to press a button or have other tasks
interrupted. All received mail is still present in my inbox, with
all mail information there, but those with infected attachments have
their attachments replaced by a text file giving details of the virus
that was in the deleted file.

If you're happy with 2002, fine - I just prefer the functionality in
2001 and for any others that do, it does seem to work in XP ok if
certain precautions are taken at installation.

John


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: Anti-virus plugins

2002-01-01 Thread John Rainer

(apologies if this appears twice)

Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002 and
the loss of the autodelete function for infected mail after moving
from 2001)

I've found that Norton 2001 works fine (so far!) with the Bat in XP if
the instructions found from the google search below are followed.
Norton were very cagy about it working, citing the Microsoft
compatiblity update as untested. in fact, I suspect all the MS update
is is a warning flash on installation about the symevent file in 2001
being incompatible, but installing the updated file during the main
install seems to work ok.

Uninstalling 2002 was a pain, though - the uninstall routine leaves
loads of stuff in the registry which I manually cleared out, and a
number of dll files. Even then, the new install picked up my
registration details from the 2002 install. At least my 90 day oem
2001 copy now has the 365 days of updates of the retail 2002 that was
there before!

My mail downloads are now fully automatic but I've disabled all the
scheduled tasks just in case there is still a problem with Symevent.

John Rainer

Friday, December 28, 2001, 8:22:47 PM, you wrote:

JR Friday, December 28, 2001, 6:45:55 PM, you wrote:


S John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
S observations.  I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
S I have not seen the option.  Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
S work.

S I'd be interested to know whether or not you are successful in using
S NAV2001 with WinXP.  I did try it, but got the not compatible
S warnings.  Symantec has some information on using it, but was very
S hard to find on their web site, and seemed very sketchy.  I never
S could make it work and from what others say, they couldn't either.

JR Sam,

JR I found the following info on Google - I don't know if it is reliable
JR or not! Put HjWi7.17602$[EMAIL PROTECTED] complete with
JR quotes into a Google news search.

JR There is also a software compatibility update for XP where Norton
JR Antivirus 2001 is mentioned - I've contacted Symantec about it and am
JR awaiting a response (cue moaning wind and tumbleweed). See
JR 
http://servicenews.symantec.com/cgi-bin/displayArticle.cgi?group=symantec.support.winnt.nortonantivirus2002.generalarticle=25317
JR - I did not post the original article but did follow it up.

JR John


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2002-01-01 Thread Allie C Martin

@ 19:05:47 + [ Tue, 1 Jan 2002], John Rainer [JR] thoughtfully
wrote the following:
...
JR Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002
JR and the loss of the autodelete function for infected mail after
JR moving from 2001)

I'm a PC-Cillin user, and this new system I got came with NAV 2002
installed.. I've been using it and have so far had one bad experience.
I disable the mail checker since I use the system monitor. However, it
would appear that it stakes out the temp folder and will alert you of
virus or virus-like presence in the temp folder. No problem. However,
TB! was in the process of downloading an infected message and as soon
as NAV2002 detected it in the temp folder it alerted me but this
process somehow prevents TB! from completing the download and deletion
from the server. As a result of this, TB! kept attempting the download
until I had to manually delete the offending message from the server.

This I find annoying. PC-Cillin never did or caused this.

-- 
.-.-.
   (  :  )   ©Allie C Martin
 .-.\ ' /.-. List Moderator and fellow end user
(_.. 'Y' .._)  TB! v1.54 Beta/20  WinXP Home
 (   /|\   )   -
  '-' | '-'   PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
¯¯


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: Anti-virus plugins

2002-01-01 Thread John Rainer

Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002 and
the loss of the autodelete function for infected mail after moving
from 2001)

I've found that Norton 2001 works fine (so far!) with the Bat in XP if
the instructions found from the google search below are followed.
Norton were very cagy about it working, citing the Microsoft
compatiblity update as untested. in fact, I suspect all the MS update
is is a warning flash on installation about the symevent file in 2001
being incompatible, but installing the updated file during the main
install seems to work ok.

Uninstalling 2002 was a pain, though - the uninstall routine leaves
loads of stuff in the registry which I manually cleared out, and a
number of dll files. Even then, the new install picked up my
registration details from the 2002 install. At least my 90 day oem
2001 copy now has the 365 days of updates of the retail 2002 that was
there before!

My mail downloads are now fully automatic but I've disabled all the
scheduled tasks just in case there is still a problem with Symevent.

John Rainer

Friday, December 28, 2001, 8:22:47 PM, you wrote:

JR Friday, December 28, 2001, 6:45:55 PM, you wrote:


S John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
S observations.  I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
S I have not seen the option.  Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
S work.

S I'd be interested to know whether or not you are successful in using
S NAV2001 with WinXP.  I did try it, but got the not compatible
S warnings.  Symantec has some information on using it, but was very
S hard to find on their web site, and seemed very sketchy.  I never
S could make it work and from what others say, they couldn't either.

JR Sam,

JR I found the following info on Google - I don't know if it is reliable
JR or not! Put HjWi7.17602$[EMAIL PROTECTED] complete with
JR quotes into a Google news search.

JR There is also a software compatibility update for XP where Norton
JR Antivirus 2001 is mentioned - I've contacted Symantec about it and am
JR awaiting a response (cue moaning wind and tumbleweed). See
JR 
http://servicenews.symantec.com/cgi-bin/displayArticle.cgi?group=symantec.support.winnt.nortonantivirus2002.generalarticle=25317
JR - I did not post the original article but did follow it up.

JR John


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


Norton AV2002 seems to work with the_Bat.  I know it checks the
outgoing mail and supposedly checks the incoming mail.  I probably
have had warnings on the incoming mail, but the_Bat seems more or less
immune to viruses so AV2002 is not triggered unless I was to try and
open an attachment, which is don't.

-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

He who can, does. He who cannot, teaches.  (George Bernard Shaw)

 tbudl...

 What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
 can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
 how I would use it to check my incoming emails.




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Dave Nadeau


S Norton AV2002 seems to work with the_Bat.  I know it checks the
S outgoing mail and supposedly checks the incoming mail.

 What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
 can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
 how I would use it to check my incoming emails.

  Norton  Antivirus  works  very  well  with The Bat!  Be sure to
  enable the manual mail configuration, and for each mail account
  (assuming  that  it's a POP account), use pop3.norton.antivirus
  instead of the POP mail address.  Use that one in your username
  line:   username/pop.mail   The  SMTP  address  will remain
  unaffected.   The  online help will have more detail, just make
  sure to look under manual mail configuration.

  I   have   my  NAV  setup  to  automatically  delete  infected
  attachments.   All  I see in the left hand frame is a file icon
  with  some  Norton  Virus  Detected  message.   I  got  another
  Badtrans  sent  to  me  yesterday,  and  Norton  and The Bat!
  handled it wonderfully.

-- 
Dave Nadeau
Fort Collins, CO


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

28 Dec 2001 at 14:30:37 ,
Peter Adams wrote the following
on the Anti-virus plugins thread:

PA What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
PA can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
PA how I would use it to check my incoming emails.

Doesn't BitDefender have an option to scan mails ?

- --
If you meet someone without a smile, give them yours!
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team

iD8DBQE8LGYb8WBGNj3ut+0RAkYpAJ9OwlMuoFGEiKstuRTcXIvvwigCvgCcD7LM
mi9Jdu8FnYKyJSMdxyXjAIU=
=iVlj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


Actually, NAV2002 does not need to be set up manually.  Someone
previously mentioned setting up NAV2001 manually.  I had tried that
some time ago, and didn't think it worked.  Someone again mentioned it
later and I tried it again and I still could not get it to work with
the_Bat.  Seems like NAV2001 would not start because of an error.
Probably a case of me not having it set up right, but I had followed
what directions were available.

-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Be the change that you want to see in the world.  (Mohandas Gandhi)
Visit my web site at http://personal.mem.bellsouth.net/mem/s/a/sammtn/home.html


   Norton  Antivirus  works  very  well  with The Bat!  Be sure to
   enable the manual mail configuration, and for each mail account
   (assuming  that  it's a POP account), use pop3.norton.antivirus
   instead of the POP mail address.  Use that one in your username
   line:   username/pop.mail   The  SMTP  address  will remain
   unaffected.   The  online help will have more detail, just make
   sure to look under manual mail configuration.




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Don Taylor

 What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
 can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
 how I would use it to check my incoming emails.

I've been using AVG (www.grisoft.com) for several months now, and I
like it very much. So far, though, they don't tie into The Bat! for
incoming/outgoing mail. If anyone else on this list is using AVG,
please join with me in nagging grisoft to tie into The Bat! as they
have with OE (yuk!).

-Don

The Bat! 1.53d


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Luc

It  was foretold that on 28/12/2001 @ 08:12:10 GMT-0800 (which was 17:12 where I
live) Don Taylor wrote and spread these wise comments on Anti-virus plugins:

 I've been using AVG (www.grisoft.com) for several months now, and I
 like it very much. So far, though, they don't tie into The Bat! for
 incoming/outgoing mail. If anyone else on this list is using AVG,
 please join with me in nagging grisoft to tie into The Bat! as they
 have with OE (yuk!).

I'm your man !! using AVG too and hoping they will tie it into The Bat!
 --
Best regards,
 Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 1


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


Hi Geoff,

NAV2002 seems to bear little resemblance to NAV2001.  It no longer has
an are which tells you what e-mail clients are detected and protected.
Upon installation, The_Bat is detected and will scan the sent e-mail
as well as the received e-mail.  It still has the Live Update features
but the rest has changed.

I printed off your directions for using The_Bat and NAV2001 and I'll
re-check the setup, but it seems to be what I originally tried.  If
there is one point I might have missed it would be putting my user
name in front of my mail server, although I think I did.

-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Be the change that you want to see in the world.  (Mohandas Gandhi)
Visit my web site at http://personal.mem.bellsouth.net/mem/s/a/sammtn/home.html


 BTW, what's different about NAV2002 that it does not need manual
 configuration? Has TB been added to the list of mail clients that it
 recognises?

 HTH,




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread John Rainer

Friday, December 28, 2001, 1:36:47 PM, you wrote:


DN   Norton  Antivirus  works  very  well  with The Bat!  Be sure to
DN   enable the manual mail configuration, and for each mail account
DN   (assuming  that  it's a POP account), use pop3.norton.antivirus
DN   instead of the POP mail address.  Use that one in your username
DN   line:   username/pop.mail   The  SMTP  address  will remain
DN   unaffected.   The  online help will have more detail, just make
DN   sure to look under manual mail configuration.

DN   I   have   my  NAV  setup  to  automatically  delete  infected
DN   attachments.   All  I see in the left hand frame is a file icon
DN   with  some  Norton  Virus  Detected  message.   I  got  another
DN   Badtrans  sent  to  me  yesterday,  and  Norton  and The Bat!
DN   handled it wonderfully.

Dave,

Which version are you using? - I've gone to 2002 because I'm now using
XP and the autodelete function seems not to be present in 2002 -
worked fine in 2000 and 2001 though.

The email scanner in 2002 works in a very different way to earlier
versions and needs no email client configuration. The only automatic
function seems to be autorepair, which pops up a dialog on every
infected mail (infuriating) as it can't repair it, plus it picks up
the tmp file created by the bat, presumably because the mail is
intercepted in a different way from 2000/2001. To make things worse,
what's left of any infected mail has most of its headers removed. I've
heard that 2001 can be got to work in XP, so I might give it a try -
that worked fine in Windows 2000.

Advice from Symantec on their forums seems to be along the lines of
disabling the email scanner, as it is only a supplementary function,
and relying instead on the resident scanner. Seems to ignore the point
of why some users want to use email scanning but there you go.

John Rainer



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[4]: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Dave Nadeau

Hi John,

JR Which version are you using? - I've gone to 2002 because I'm now using
JR XP and the autodelete function seems not to be present in 2002 -
JR worked fine in 2000 and 2001 though.

I've got about 1 1/2 months left on my NAV2001.  I didn't realize
that the 2002 version was so different.  The manual configuration
and autodelete are a snap with NAV2001.   I'm on Win2K Pro SP2.

I guess I'll see what NAV2002 looks like in about 45 days
-- 
Dave Nadeau
Fort Collins, CO


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 07:10:41 -0600GMT (which was 14:10 +0100GMT where I live),
Sam thought about Anti-virus plugins and wrote:

S I probably have had warnings on the incoming mail, but the_Bat seems
S more or less immune to viruses so AV2002 is not triggered unless I was
S to try and open an attachment, which is don't.

Hi Sam,

you are right. The Bat! will give you a real hard time before you can open
an email-virus! Thumbs up! ;o)

Still you will need your AV for other possible ways of infections...

- --
Cheers
Peter

'Fatal error: Keyboard not found! Press Enter to continue.'
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPG for better authentication. Key-ID: 0xE10774CE

iD8DBQE8LL20AzZSBuEHdM4RAvOEAKDv3G8rYzoj2Qi6IGXBZ4Ys1NRMYgCg7VyQ
lizzEk1pEuRiT5pSxwEHiD4=
=zQlI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
observations.  I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
I have not seen the option.  Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
work.

I'd be interested to know whether or not you are successful in using
NAV2001 with WinXP.  I did try it, but got the not compatible
warnings.  Symantec has some information on using it, but was very
hard to find on their web site, and seemed very sketchy.  I never
could make it work and from what others say, they couldn't either.


-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The harder you work the luckier you become.

 Which version are you using? - I've gone to 2002 because I'm now using
 XP and the autodelete function seems not to be present in 2002 -
 worked fine in 2000 and 2001 though.

 The email scanner in 2002 works in a very different way to earlier
 versions and needs no email client configuration. The only automatic
 function seems to be autorepair, which pops up a dialog on every
 infected mail (infuriating) as it can't repair it, plus it picks up
 the tmp file created by the bat, presumably because the mail is
 intercepted in a different way from 2000/2001. To make things worse,
 what's left of any infected mail has most of its headers removed. I've
 heard that 2001 can be got to work in XP, so I might give it a try -
 that worked fine in Windows 2000.

 Advice from Symantec on their forums seems to be along the lines of
 disabling the email scanner, as it is only a supplementary function,
 and relying instead on the resident scanner. Seems to ignore the point
 of why some users want to use email scanning but there you go.

 John Rainer




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


Hi Peter,

You are correct.  The_Bat does a good job on viruses, which seem to be
extremely abundant these days.  I have yet to get infected, thanks to
stance the_Bat takes.  The virus scan program is very important, maybe
not for the_Bat, but for Outlook Express and Outlook, both of which
are on this computer even though they are only uses sparingly.  I use
OE for HTML mail, but might try using Word and attaching it to
the_Bat.  Only bad part is that most of my correspondents will not
open attachments either.  LOL


-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn 
anything from history.  (George Bernard Shaw) 


 you are right. The Bat! will give you a real hard time before you can open
 an email-virus! Thumbs up! ;o)

 Still you will need your AV for other possible ways of infections...

 - --
 Cheers
 Peter




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:51:42 -0600GMT (which was 19:51 +0100GMT where I live),
Sam thought about Anti-virus plugins and wrote:

S I have yet to get infected, thanks to stance the_Bat takes. The virus
S scan program is very important, maybe not for the_Bat, but for Outlook
S Express and Outlook, both of which are on this computer even though they
S are only uses sparingly.

Sure, Sam, sparingly might be enough! ;-)

S I use OE for HTML mail, but might try using Word and attaching it to
S the_Bat. Only bad part is that most of my correspondents will not open
S attachments either. LOL

For what in the world do you need HTML in emails? Ok, sending mom an x-mas
card. Right. I'd use OE for that too. ;o)

Have a good time! :-)

- --
Cheers
Peter

'DOS Tip #17: Add DEVICE=FNGRCROS.SYS to CONFIG.SYS'
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPG for better authentication. Key-ID: 0xE10774CE

iD8DBQE8LMreAzZSBuEHdM4RAmwtAJ4qnO623Y+GpXl/GcLz9aIct5BgugCdH/vS
G2NpAxSBOjc3xhGKdxKfefg=
=6eOL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


S I have yet to get infected, thanks to stance the_Bat takes. The virus
S scan program is very important, maybe not for the_Bat, but for Outlook
S Express and Outlook, both of which are on this computer even though they
S are only uses sparingly.

 Sure, Sam, sparingly might be enough! ;-)

Can't argue here.  When I say sparingly, I do indeed mean SPARINGLY.
I have some in-laws who are gung-ho on HTML; don't think they EVER
send a plain text message.  I use it when I want to send a picture
imbedded in the message, something I don't think can be done in
the_Bat.  It can be sent as an attachment, but, like I said, many
people will not open attachments, me included unless I know what is
being sent and by whom.

S I use OE for HTML mail, but might try using Word and attaching it to
S the_Bat. Only bad part is that most of my correspondents will not open
S attachments either. LOL

 For what in the world do you need HTML in emails? Ok, sending mom an x-mas
 card. Right. I'd use OE for that too. ;o)

I don't even send Christmas or other holiday cards by HTML.  I use
Hallmark or Blue Mountain e-cards.  I use it to send pictures.  I do
feel HTML is a bane to the internet and should be stopped but that
surely will never happen.  Too many tyros on the net who go ga-ga over
that stuff.  I notice The_Bat is working on incorporating HTML  in the
next version; sure hope they don't mess up the good thing they
presently have.

 Peter

-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread John Rainer

Friday, December 28, 2001, 6:45:55 PM, you wrote:


S John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
S observations.  I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
S I have not seen the option.  Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
S work.

S I'd be interested to know whether or not you are successful in using
S NAV2001 with WinXP.  I did try it, but got the not compatible
S warnings.  Symantec has some information on using it, but was very
S hard to find on their web site, and seemed very sketchy.  I never
S could make it work and from what others say, they couldn't either.

Sam,

I found the following info on Google - I don't know if it is reliable
or not! Put HjWi7.17602$[EMAIL PROTECTED] complete with
quotes into a Google news search.

There is also a software compatibility update for XP where Norton
Antivirus 2001 is mentioned - I've contacted Symantec about it and am
awaiting a response (cue moaning wind and tumbleweed). See
http://servicenews.symantec.com/cgi-bin/displayArticle.cgi?group=symantec.support.winnt.nortonantivirus2002.generalarticle=25317
- I did not post the original article but did follow it up.

John



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Sam


Hi John,

Thanks, I filed the information on using NAV2001 with WinXP just in
case.

Good luck with your inquiry to Symantec.  My experience with them is
not great.  I get conflicting, and frequently incorrect information
and, like the inquiry quoted, it is the problem of the user, not
Symantec.  That seems to be a given.   Of course, this is if they even
bother to answer my inquiries.

-- 
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There are two theories about arguing with women 
Neither one works.
Visit my web site at http://personal.mem.bellsouth.net/mem/s/a/sammtn/home.html



 I found the following info on Google - I don't know if it is reliable
 or not! Put HjWi7.17602$[EMAIL PROTECTED] complete with
 quotes into a Google news search.

 There is also a software compatibility update for XP where Norton
 Antivirus 2001 is mentioned - I've contacted Symantec about it and am
 awaiting a response (cue moaning wind and tumbleweed). See
 
http://servicenews.symantec.com/cgi-bin/displayArticle.cgi?group=symantec.support.winnt.nortonantivirus2002.generalarticle=25317
 - I did not post the original article but did follow it up.

 John




-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-28 Thread Marek Mikus

Hello all,

 What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
 can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
 how I would use it to check my incoming emails.

DT I've been using AVG (www.grisoft.com) for several months now, and I
DT like it very much. So far, though, they don't tie into The Bat! for
DT incoming/outgoing mail. If anyone else on this list is using AVG,
DT please join with me in nagging grisoft to tie into The Bat! as they
DT have with OE (yuk!).

Grisoft working on POP/SMTP proxy and should be released soon.

I contacted them (they are in my town) and received their API, so I
sent it to Stefan for creating plugin. If will be possible to support
it, it will be.

BTW Grisoft use The Bat! as their mailer :-)

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus

Using the best The Bat! 1.54 Beta/21
under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build 67766446 A 
AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 256 MB RAM


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Anti-virus plugins

2001-12-27 Thread Peter Adams

tbudl...

What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
how I would use it to check my incoming emails.

-- 
Peter
http://www.escapism.co.uk/praest76/
np: Data Bank A - ...In It's Wake 


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com