Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Victor B. Gonzalez [VBG] wrote:'

VBG In actuality I have 2 AVs. pccillin  Norton fully updated. I
VBG manually choose to disable their running active on purpose.

You'd have to do this anyway since having both doing realtime
scanning could crash your system and even render it unbootable since
the real time scanner startup at boot time would lead to conflicts.

VBG One thing then I would need help with if someone would be so
VBG kind. One, I understand The Bat! supports the AVG plugin, but
VBG do I need AVG running all the time or can AVG simply launch
VBG unnoticeably when I hit send to send mail out  then just stop?

No. You don't need AVG running all the time. The plug-in uses it as
needed.

VBG I would like AVG to only scan outgoing mail  at all other
VBG times remain inactive not scanning anything else.

The plug-in is your friend then.

-- 
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Victor,

On Sun, 29 Dec 2002 00:18:41 -0500GMT (29-12-02, 6:18 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

VBG I would like AVG to only scan outgoing mail  at all other
VBG times remain inactive not scanning anything else.

That's rather useless. Most viruses use their own smtp-client to
deliver themselves at your outgoing smtp-server. Those that don't do
that, use Outlook or OE to deliver their stuff. Therefore it won't do
you any good to scan TB's outgoing mail.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mike,

On Sun, 29 Dec 2002 04:48:14 + GMT (29/12/02, 11:48 +0700 GMT),
Mike Alexander wrote:

JA   Could you please enlighten me as to what viruses TB! is susceptible
JA   to? You'll only be infected with a virus through TB! if you were
JA   foolish enough to launch the file without checking it first, or
JA   trusting the source explicitly, and still launching it.

 I agree. Except for Trojans of course.

How can you ben infected through TB with a trojan?

 And as long as you keep all your mail incoming to text only.

No, TB's HTML rendering engine does not allow code to run.

 And as long as you don't click on something sent to you by a friend.
 And as long as you don't click on something by accident.

In both these cases, you have to either actually switch off the
Warning feature in TB, or ignore the warning. so, accidents are not
really possible, and TB will allow you to open the file sent to you by
a friend, because TB assumes you know what you are doing when you
click the warning away. I would not like TB to nanny me that far.

 And as long as you have AV software to make sure none of the above
 happens if you don't take the necessary precautions for one reason
 or another.

There are enough people who don't run AV software for email, as long
as they run TB. It is pretty difficult to start a received malware by
accident from within TB.

;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Important warning for aircraft pilots: Teeth that have been improperly
filled cause problems with altitude or rapid decompressions. The
higher pressure under the filling will cause excruciating pain and in
rare instances can cause the tooth to explode. An exploding tooth
would be distracting.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, December 29, 2002, Roelof Otten wrote...

VBG I would like AVG to only scan outgoing mail  at all other times
VBG remain inactive not scanning anything else.

 That's rather useless. Most viruses use their own smtp-client to
 deliver themselves at your outgoing smtp-server. Those that don't do
 that, use Outlook or OE to deliver their stuff. Therefore it won't
 do you any good to scan TB's outgoing mail.

  Depends on how you have it setup. Yes, it's rather useless if you
  have it as a plugin, as you said, some viruses contain their own
  smtp-engine.  However, Norton 2002 (and maybe 2000) doesn't scan in
  the same way.  It actually listens for connection attempts to port
  25, and puts in an intermediary 'wall' to scan all the outgoing
  mail.  IE:

Before:
TheBat  - ISP SMTP

After:
TheBat  - Norton  - ISP SMTP

  So even if a virus such as klez was caught, Norton would probably
  catch it trying to send.

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393  B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73

iQA/AwUBPg8cGCuD6BT4/R9zEQKTJgCfUSUpwHG42PRwf7Bpab9n5LeuodwAoOrw
uSqCVyIqgJYbeXXAJhxIxg5U
=iW/8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[3]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Barry2
Hello Victor,

Sunday, December 29, 2002, 5:18:41 AM, you wrote:

VBG -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
VBG Hash: SHA1

VBG Hello Mike,

VBG   I have no Virus plug ins that work with The Bat! and no
VBG   Anti-Virus scanner running active.

VBG In actuality I have 2 AVs. pccillin  Norton fully updated.
VBG I manually choose to disable their running active on
VBG purpose. I like my system to run quicker  faster  do not
VBG appreciate the lag these types of programs create.

I can appreciate that, but the faster systems these days hardly even
hiccup with a real-time virus scanner working away. Right now I'm
running Kaspersky AVP, which is set to scan all files all of the time,
as well as 3 distributed computing programs plus a host of other
background stuff ( 21 icons in the system tray !! ) and not a glimmer
of a stutter as I type away and send mail  lol 

BTW - as Roelof says, having 2 AV's real time scan is not a good idea
even if your system is the fastest - they fight for control !!

-- 
Best regards,
 Barry2
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[3]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Victor,

Sunday, December 29, 2002, 5:18:41 AM, you wrote:


VBG In actuality I have 2 AVs. pccillin  Norton fully updated.
VBG I manually choose to disable their running active on
VBG purpose. I like my system to run quicker  faster  do not
VBG appreciate the lag these types of programs create.

Er, don't :) That is, don't have 2 AVs as they will tend to crash
your system if you run them both at the same time, and don't turn the
AV you do have off. On any modern computer the the lag will be so
small you won't notice it in terms of machine use. I use Norton and I
don't even notice it's there on an Athlon Thunderbird 800 machine
with 1.3 Gb of RAM.

A Seriously, you absolutely should have a scanner. You could be one of
MA the people passing on viruses to people.

VBG Even if I had executed the virus and it be one of the worst
VBG viruses in existence it really wouldn't have affected me in
VBG the least.

How do you know? And how do you know it won't affect someone else?

VBG I've built my systems to be +virus proof and I can literally
VBG catch over 400 different viruses in one shot and it wouldn't
VBG make a difference to my information or OS  boot stability.

Victor, you really need to read the literature. There is no such
thing as 100% virus/worm/Trojan proof. There is only a very high
degree of protection. That's because each new incursion will result in
a virus/worm/Trojan which you don't know about and which executes code
you may not be protected against.

VBG To be honest I don't even need my currently updated AVs.

Yes, you do. :)

MA Not having a scanner not only means you can get infected, it also
MA means you can pass it on to other people.

VBG You're right!  you got me there. I know not every one has
VBG systems  plans in place like I do to fend off viruses,
VBG Trojans  worms.

You may fend off most, but basically, even you if a triple-cycled
sheep dip machine, you can till miss something.

VBG I have plans on writing a report on how to operate 
VBG maintain a safe and healthy OS after I finish my spam report
VBG and to be honest you've made a point I really didn't stop to
VBG think about.

I should check out what's already on the Net before leaping into
writing something. I'm not saying you don't know enough or can't help
people to learn some tricks, but your attitude to new threats and to
passing on nasties seems a little naive. And that's not meant in any
way offensively.

VBG One thing then I would need help with if someone would be
VBG so kind. One, I understand The Bat! supports the AVG plugin,
VBG but do I need AVG running all the time or can AVG simply
VBG launch unnoticeably when I hit send to send mail out  then
VBG just stop?

You'd be much better off with the excellent Norton engine that you
already have, running all the time.


-- 
Best regards,
 Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Jonathan,

Sunday, December 29, 2002, 5:33:26 AM, you wrote:

JA   I was after a specific example of a virus that affects TB!, as from
JA   the statement, it'd appear that you think there are viruses that are
JA   propagated via TB!, I'm not saying there are any, but I've not seen
JA   any. Of course, there are methods of getting viruses from websites,
JA   iframe and javascript for example, but none of those are specific to
JA   TB! I'd like to hear of an example that specifically affects TB! and
JA   doesn't require that you make some kind of user interaction, because
JA   if user interaction is required, then again, it's not specific to
JA   TB, but could be included in a floppy disk, CD, website, download,
JA   or whatever, at which point you'd have to run it anyway.

Unlikely. Most viruses/worms/trojans are not program-specific. It's
only the cr*p from the script kiddies that usually is, and that's
just because they're using virus engineering software they've
downloaded off a site and don't know any better.

JA Not that I am worried, I run Sophos on our mail servers, so I'm
JA not too worried about getting infected, but I'd still like to
JA know which viruses you think affect TB!

Yeah, Sophos is generally good, particularly in it's corporate form,
as I said. Which viruses/worms/trojans?  Any that are targeted at
mail generically as opposed to OL/OE specific.  TB is still software
like any other and anything that would target the underlying mail
engine i.e. that targets pop3, smtp etc will have an effect on TB. So,
a generic which distributed itself by attaching to any sent message would
affect TB as much as any other mail program.  At least TB has it's own
address book which solves one of the current problems :)

 Good. Actually, people cause far more problems these days by
 transmission rather than by their own misfortune :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Thomas,

Sunday, December 29, 2002, 2:21:19 PM, you wrote:


TF How can you ben infected through TB with a trojan?

Through an attachment for example. Even from a trusted source.

 And as long as you keep all your mail incoming to text only.

TF No, TB's HTML rendering engine does not allow code to run.

Code doesn't have to run in TB. You can download mail from a trusted
source, save it to disk and run it from there. And you may never know
you have the trojan as a good trojan will not affect your machine
until, for example, the time comes for your machine to be used in a
DDOS attack.

 And as long as you don't click on something sent to you by a friend.
 And as long as you don't click on something by accident.

TF In both these cases, you have to either actually switch off the
TF Warning feature in TB, or ignore the warning. so, accidents are not
TF really possible, and TB will allow you to open the file sent to you by
TF a friend, because TB assumes you know what you are doing when you
TF click the warning away. I would not like TB to nanny me that far.

And there is a good example of a security hole. How do you know your
friend isn't passing on an infection, whether it be worm/virus or
trojan?

 And as long as you have AV software to make sure none of the above
 happens if you don't take the necessary precautions for one reason
 or another.

TF There are enough people who don't run AV software for email, as long
TF as they run TB. It is pretty difficult to start a received malware by
TF accident from within TB.

If you're not convinced by my trusted source argument:

It wasn't that long ago that Microsoft distributed a CD to 2000
developers at a Developers Conference which contained a virus/worm.
And it was only a couple of years before that that Novell sent out 50k
copies of it's what was then it's current networking product also
containing a worm. ;-)



-- 
Best regards,
 Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[4]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Mike,

MA Sunday, December 29, 2002, 5:18:41 AM, you wrote:

VBG In actuality I have 2 AVs. pccillin  Norton fully updated.

MA Er, don't :) That is, don't have 2 AVs as they will tend to crash
MA your system if you run them both at the same time

A Seriously, you absolutely should have a scanner. You could be one of
MA the people passing on viruses to people.

VBG Even if I had executed the virus and it be one of the worst
VBG viruses in existence it really wouldn't have affected me in
VBG the least.

MA How do you know? And how do you know it won't affect someone else?

It could take me a long time to explain and is why I am
writing the report. I have measures of methods that I've
been following for a long time and they have proven well.

VBG I've built my systems to be +virus proof and I can literally
VBG catch over 400 different viruses in one shot and it wouldn't
VBG make a difference to my information or OS  boot stability.

MA Victor, you really need to read the literature. There is no such
MA thing as 100% virus/worm/Trojan proof.

The answer is in your own statement. No such thing (AV) that
is 100% malware proof.

   Day 1 - You update your AV with day 1 signature.
   Day 2 - New malware on loose. Next AV update is day 4.
   Day 3 - Malware infects your OS, melting your ice cream.

MA There is only a very high degree of protection. That's
MA because each new incursion will result in a
MA virus/worm/Trojan which you don't know about and which
MA executes code you may not be protected against.

I've read somewhere that human error is 77% responsible for
system failures.

   Human Error Vs. Malware

If that is the case then I am willing to bet (just a bet)
the remaining 27% who protected against a virus but catches
one fall into the 77% of human error.

VBG To be honest I don't even need my currently updated AVs.

MA Yes, you do. :)

MA Not having a scanner not only means you can get infected, it also
MA means you can pass it on to other people.

I agree, I apologize. Though my smarts and methods might
prove great against an attack on my OS, I only agree because
I wasn't thinking about everyone else when it came to my OS.

VBG You're right!  you got me there. I know not every one has
VBG systems  plans in place like I do to fend off viruses,
VBG Trojans  worms.

MA You may fend off most, but basically, even you if a triple-cycled
MA sheep dip machine, you can till miss something.

what?

VBG I have plans on writing a report on how to operate 
VBG maintain a safe and healthy OS after I finish my spam report
VBG and to be honest you've made a point I really didn't stop to
VBG think about.

MA I should check out what's already on the Net before leaping into
MA writing something. I'm not saying you don't know enough or can't help
MA people to learn some tricks, but your attitude to new threats and to
MA passing on nasties seems a little naive. And that's not meant in any
MA way offensively.

No offense taken what so ever :) A good debate is the father
of a good report.

I was though for the record not mentioning writing a report
about AVs but a report on good system maintenance.

The future report is mainly aimed at protecting yourself
and not others; but what is safety with a disregard of it
towards others?

You're right and I am not upset. I can only thank you for
your point of view on the subject.

VBG One thing then I would need help with if someone would be
VBG so kind. One, I understand The Bat! supports the AVG plugin,
VBG but do I need AVG running all the time or can AVG simply
VBG launch unnoticeably when I hit send to send mail out  then
VBG just stop?

I do still prefer a plug-in VS. full system watch AVs. Which
is the best freeware version out? I don't really like the
idea of paying for another anti-virus scanner :(

MA You'd be much better off with the excellent Norton engine that you
MA already have, running all the time.

NAV is a part of my NSW2002 Pro package and I don't have it
installed. Does it have plug-in support because then maybe
I'll pull it out of the box?

I do have MicroTrend PC-cillin 2000 installed and it is
actively updated but it fails to catch incoming  outgoing
virus attachments :(

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPg/c/13LB35+TCg0EQLEfQCg3dtk5+3kCQYUmJAqYtDYR17Xxe0AoND9
z1ZysyRUORxbtMG1OrrWm2Ms
=NOhf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, December 29, 2002, Mike Alexander wrote...

JA   I was after a specific example of a virus that affects TB!, as from
JA   the statement, it'd appear that you think there are viruses that are
JA   propagated via TB!

 Unlikely. Most viruses/worms/trojans are not program-specific. It's
 only the cr*p from the script kiddies that usually is, and that's
 just because they're using virus engineering software they've
 downloaded off a site and don't know any better.

  Blah, some of the most recently ones are easily coded in delphi, and
  would take no more than 30mins to make. I still seem to be missing
  your point though, from your statement, you made it seem like there
  were viruses that specifically targetted TB!... but now you're
  saying all programs in general? A rather obvious statement, and
  something most people that watch the news would probably be aware
  of.

 Any that are targeted at mail generically as opposed to OL/OE
 specific.

  Which are?

 TB is still software like any other and anything that would target
 the underlying mail engine i.e. that targets pop3, smtp etc will
 have an effect on TB.

  Not really... I've not seen one that specifically uses TB!'s mail
  handling to do its work, and in fact have only seen ones that use
  Outlook (Express) to do that, or have their own custom handler to do
  so (see Klez again).

 So, a generic which distributed itself by attaching to any sent
 message would affect TB as much as any other mail program.

  Er, only if you were foolish enough to execute the attachment from a
  trusted point of view. If you are 100% sure of the source, and
  trusted it explicitly, you're bound to cause yourself problems.

 At least TB has it's own address book which solves one of the
 current problems :)

  Not really. The addressbook files are readable in notepad, and I can
  grab email addresses that way. The mail base files (.tbb) are also
  readable in notepad, which would also contain addresses.  Just as a
  point on this:

   
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Bugbear reads .tbb files for email addresses ;)

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393  B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73

iQA/AwUBPg/fiiuD6BT4/R9zEQIAxwCggsWPoT5R3+pdu/rVxdljMwL4EPwAnjDa
RxDMXa3rESkuSK6L/HjiPKDT
=HwAE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello tbudl,

  I have no Virus plug ins that work with The Bat! and no
  Anti-Virus scanner running active.

  I was cleaning my hard drive out and came across a
  message titled:

   l2_button_myphonebook_page

Within it were two attachments

   Message.htm
   Readme.exe

Knowing it'll be stupid to launch anything entitled
readme.exe I decided the hell with it let me double click it
and The Bat! quickly intercepted and said...

   This file is not allowed for opening under any
   circumstances...

Very cool!, I downloaded it to my hard drive and said the
hell with it, I'll scan it. PC-cillin said it was infected
with the PE_NIMBDA.A-0 Virus.

The moral of the story is if The Bat! wasn't so smart I
would have been proven to be real stupid.

Nice catch. I just thought I would share that with you all.
BTW, 4 years on-line and this is my first catch :)

Is it a sign?

Wierdest thing is it was actually located on a shared drive
on the network. It wasn't really on my PC to begin with but
was in a shared folder that no one really touches.

hmmm I will look up this virus and slap the owner.

If only it we're that easy huh... Oh,well

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPg37eV3LB35+TCg0EQIABACg20S93ek8R/+vpjhgiL9cB2ysUvkAoLu9
Eyzr6QrSizME1Fbrx7McrjfP
=r66x
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Victor,

on Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:29:05 -0500GMT (28.12.02, 20:29 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

VBG   I have no Virus plug ins that work with The Bat! and no
VBG   Anti-Virus scanner running active.

You should have at least the latter... ;-)

VBG ...
VBG Knowing it'll be stupid to launch anything entitled
VBG readme.exe I decided the hell with it let me double click it
VBG and The Bat! quickly intercepted and said...

VBGThis file is not allowed for opening under any
VBGcircumstances...

Lucky you for not having changed TB!'s default settings. *S*

VBG Very cool!, I downloaded it to my hard drive and said the
VBG hell with it, I'll scan it. PC-cillin said it was infected
VBG with the PE_NIMBDA.A-0 Virus.

See.

VBG The moral of the story is if The Bat! wasn't so smart I
VBG would have been proven to be real stupid.

Yes, indeed, you would have! :)

VBG Nice catch. I just thought I would share that with you all.
VBG BTW, 4 years on-line and this is my first catch :)

VBG Is it a sign?

It is certainly a sign that you should watch which files to download and
execute... ;-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

It takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech.
 Mark Twain

Winamp currently playing: Rare Bird - Flight   
  



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Victor,

Saturday, December 28, 2002, 7:29:05 PM, you wrote:

VBG Hello tbudl,

VBG   I have no Virus plug ins that work with The Bat! and no
VBG   Anti-Virus scanner running active.

Yikes!! Victor, please promise me you'll never, ever email me? Thanks.
Then when I get a message from you I'll know it's definitely one of
the viruses you've caught. ;-)

Seriously, you absolutely should have a scanner. You could be one of
the people passing on viruses to people. While I realise TB isn't
prone to some of the viruses out there (a good reason for having it)
it is still prone to a lot of the other viruses/worms that are around.
Not having a scanner not only means you can get infected, it also
means you can pass it on to other people. Personally, I use Norton
AntiVirus as it consistently detects more of the nasties in tests than
anything else. The only other one I could recommend would be Sophos
Sweep which, in it's corporate form is good also.   But please, get
something.

-- 
Best regards,
Mike mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday, December 28, 2002, Mike Alexander wrote...

 While I realise TB isn't prone to some of the viruses out there (a
 good reason for having it) it is still prone to a lot of the other
 viruses/worms that are around.

  Could you please enlighten me as to what viruses TB! is susceptible
  to? You'll only be infected with a virus through TB! if you were
  foolish enough to launch the file without checking it first, or
  trusting the source explicitly, and still launching it.

 Not having a scanner not only means you can get infected, it also
 means you can pass it on to other people. Personally, I use Norton
 AntiVirus as it consistently detects more of the nasties in tests
 than anything else. The only other one I could recommend would be
 Sophos Sweep which, in it's corporate form is good also. But please,
 get something.

  Not that I am worried, I run Sophos on our mail servers, so I'm not
  too worried about getting infected, but I'd still like to know which
  viruses you think affect TB!

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393  B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73

iQA/AwUBPg5fbiuD6BT4/R9zEQJupQCfZsY6oAYeTKJ7AsCHEhOuzzcFPF4AoOfi
R35poGsMhTxu66DKXiA5WFnx
=9EbY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Victor,

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:29:05 -0500 GMT (29/12/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
Victor B. Gonzalez wrote:

 Knowing it'll be stupid to launch anything entitled
 readme.exe I decided the hell with it let me double click it
 and The Bat! quickly intercepted and said...

This file is not allowed for opening under any
circumstances...

 Very cool!,

Check out the settings under Options / Preferences / Warnings and see
why this happened. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Two wrongs are only the beginning.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Francis Mendez
Actually, I tried to allow PDF's on that screen and it still prompts me :-
/


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Victor B. Gonzalez on TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 09:59:10 +0700
Subject: Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

 Hello Victor,
 
 On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:29:05 -0500 GMT (29/12/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
 Victor B. Gonzalez wrote:
 
  Knowing it'll be stupid to launch anything entitled
  readme.exe I decided the hell with it let me double click it
  and The Bat! quickly intercepted and said...
 
 This file is not allowed for opening under any
 circumstances...
 
  Very cool!,
 
 Check out the settings under Options / Preferences / Warnings and see
 why this happened. ;-)
 
 -- 
 
 Cheers,
 Thomas.
 
 Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
 
 Two wrongs are only the beginning.
 
 Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
 using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM
 
 
 
 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Francis,

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:49:49 -0500 GMT (29/12/02, 10:49 +0700 GMT),
Francis Mendez wrote:

 Actually, I tried to allow PDF's on that screen and it still prompts me :-

Have you taklen *.PDF off the Disable list and put it under Enable
without warning?

Also, the file might have a double ending, and that may cause another
warning, which you can get rid off by clearing the tickbox.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Drink wet cement: Get Stoned.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Jonathan,

Sunday, December 29, 2002, 2:35:22 AM, you wrote:


JA   Could you please enlighten me as to what viruses TB! is susceptible
JA   to? You'll only be infected with a virus through TB! if you were
JA   foolish enough to launch the file without checking it first, or
JA   trusting the source explicitly, and still launching it.

I agree. Except for Trojans of course. And as long as you keep all
your mail incoming to text only. And as long as you don't click on
something sent to you by a friend. And as long as you don't click on
something by accident. And as long as you have AV software to make
sure none of the above happens if you don't take the necessary
precautions for one reason or another. Before Windows, there was, and
still is, *nix in it's various flavours. There are more viruses/worms,
because of it's long history for *nix than for any other OS. And they
are mostly adaptable. Now that Macs run a Unix system I expect to see
far more of these around now as there is finally a user base big
enough to make it worth the while of crackers to write for it. These
do not rely in anyway on vulnerabilities in Windows and are often
generic (i.e. cross platform). So, yes, I do agree with you providing
you never make a mistake ;-)

JA   Not that I am worried, I run Sophos on our mail servers, so I'm not
JA   too worried about getting infected, but I'd still like to know which
JA   viruses you think affect TB!

Good. Actually, people cause far more problems these days by
transmission rather than by their own misfortune :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Mike,

VBG   I have no Virus plug ins that work with The Bat! and no
VBG   Anti-Virus scanner running active.

In actuality I have 2 AVs. pccillin  Norton fully updated.
I manually choose to disable their running active on
purpose. I like my system to run quicker  faster  do not
appreciate the lag these types of programs create.

MA Yikes!! Victor, please promise me you'll never, ever email me? Thanks.
MA Then when I get a message from you I'll know it's definitely one of
MA the viruses you've caught. ;-)

hehe, ok. But I cannot promise I'll never e-mail you :)

MA Seriously, you absolutely should have a scanner. You could be one of
MA the people passing on viruses to people.

Even if I had executed the virus and it be one of the worst
viruses in existence it really wouldn't have affected me in
the least.

I've built my systems to be +virus proof and I can literally
catch over 400 different viruses in one shot and it wouldn't
make a difference to my information or OS  boot stability.

To be honest I don't even need my currently updated AVs.

MA Not having a scanner not only means you can get infected, it also
MA means you can pass it on to other people.

You're right!  you got me there. I know not every one has
systems  plans in place like I do to fend off viruses,
Trojans  worms.

I have plans on writing a report on how to operate 
maintain a safe and healthy OS after I finish my spam report
and to be honest you've made a point I really didn't stop to
think about.

One thing then I would need help with if someone would be
so kind. One, I understand The Bat! supports the AVG plugin,
but do I need AVG running all the time or can AVG simply
launch unnoticeably when I hit send to send mail out  then
just stop?

I would like AVG to only scan outgoing mail  at all other
times remain inactive not scanning anything else.

I am right now going to test sending nimbda to myself while
pccillin has pop3 mail scan active :) I'll let you know ;)

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPg6FoF3LB35+TCg0EQI9NgCfQlf51IPlNcQSVpbe5Lpn5YKt9mIAn13x
c6BtKkaAPH+rj9t74KBsgo0U
=aSEJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: I caught the NIMBDA Virus

2002-12-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday, December 28, 2002, Mike Alexander wrote...

JA Could you please enlighten me as to what viruses TB! is
JA susceptible to? You'll only be infected with a virus through TB!
JA if you were foolish enough to launch the file without checking it
JA first, or trusting the source explicitly, and still launching it.

 I agree. Except for Trojans of course.

  I was after a specific example of a virus that affects TB!, as from
  the statement, it'd appear that you think there are viruses that are
  propagated via TB!, I'm not saying there are any, but I've not seen
  any. Of course, there are methods of getting viruses from websites,
  iframe and javascript for example, but none of those are specific to
  TB! I'd like to hear of an example that specifically affects TB! and
  doesn't require that you make some kind of user interaction, because
  if user interaction is required, then again, it's not specific to
  TB, but could be included in a floppy disk, CD, website, download,
  or whatever, at which point you'd have to run it anyway.

JA Not that I am worried, I run Sophos on our mail servers, so I'm
JA not too worried about getting infected, but I'd still like to
JA know which viruses you think affect TB!

 Good. Actually, people cause far more problems these days by
 transmission rather than by their own misfortune :)

  Indeed, gone are the days where to spread a virus, it'd require you
  to grab a copy on floppy disk, and execute the program, causing
  infection. Of course, in most cases of infection (more specifically
  recently in the last year) those infected never know until somebody
  manages to track down the sender (see Klez), and let them know.

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393  B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73

iQA/AwUBPg6JKyuD6BT4/R9zEQJX3wCgkhd8tsPefOH0DG2YLURUxjXfoAQAoIGh
7Yrzl7fSpjMlRHFCHQf/YPPN
=kDEY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html