Re: SPAM Filter

2012-03-02 Thread Steven P Vallière

Jeff,

If the TB4 plug-ins are compatible with TB5, you might want
to take a look at the Regula Anti-spam plug-in.  I've been
using it ever since my mail server went to STARTLS (which
broke POPfile) about six months ago.  After a bit of training
Regula seems to be doing a good job of catching the spam that
gets through the mail server's filters.

http://www.gaijin.at/en/tbpregula.php


-- 
Steven Vallière | tb 4.2.44.2 | mailto:the...@e-visions.com
--
If you didn't write it down, then it didn't happen.
   -Larry Zana



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SPAM Filter

2012-02-29 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Jeff,

On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 you wrote:

JG Hello Group

JG I've  been away from Windows for a while but I'm now back home with XP
JG x64 and TheBat v 5.0.34.

JG I see we no longer have the BayesIT (? spelling) plug in for a variety
JG of reasons.

JG What  do  people use/recommend in its place? It's useful to be able to
JG identify SPAM and have it moved to a junk folder.

Years ago a similar question was asked and the suggestion at
that time was K9 from KEIR.NET which I have used ever since
with great success. It's a Bayesian (sp?) filter which will
tag spam with the word SPAM in the subject line. From there
you can create a filter to move it to another folder.

-- 
Jack LaRosa

Using The Bat! ver: 4.2.44.2.
Running Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spam Filter (was Re: Plugin Hotmail for TB3 ?)

2004-12-18 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Watcher  everyone else,

on 17-Dez-2004 at 21:10 you (Watcher) wrote:

 I don't know of any desktop spam filter with Bayes analysis that comes

 Wow, that is strange to hear, it worked the instant I installed it, I
 trained it very little and it has been doing well.

Thats not so strange - I don't know how BayesIt actually works, but I think
everything is considered ham until you re-classify it. :)

 Of course I have NO email offers that I consider non-spam, I don't want
 to be 'kept up to date', when I need something I'll start looking, not
 get what someone sent to my desktop to sell me something. Maybe that is
 part of the reason?

The success of any Bayes filter is dependant on one's email profile, and
undoubtfully a consistent classification by the end-user is necessary. Its
surprising however how precise PopFile can classify mails (PopFile can not
only keep ham and spam apart, but classify mails into groups that you
define yourself).


 If I start having problems, I'll download K9 as you suggested, it looks
 fine except that it's external which will be a bit more of a pain.

As it is now, both have their pros  cons... BayesIt integrates nicely into
TB, K9 has a much better configuration interface. I actually find it easier
to re-classify a mail with K9 than with BI.

BayesIt needs better integration into TB, but I think that is not the
problem of TB but rather the plugin interface. For example, I'd like to
have some buttons for classification in the mail viewer and preview pane,
and not nested in some right-click menu. I'd also like to see the score of
each message in TB, and not only in the logfiles of BI. For me, K9's
interface is simply better for that. PopFile's interface  statistics are
unrivalled IMHO, but then again, the program is so slow, it hurts. :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using TB! v3.0.2.10 Home on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2

de la Lastra's Corollary: After an access cover has been secured by 16
hold-down screws, it will be discovered that the gasket has been
ommitted.



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spam Filter (was Re: Plugin Hotmail for TB3 ?)

2004-12-17 Thread Andrew
Hello Alexander,

Friday, December 17, 2004, 1:25:25 PM, you wrote and sent the following:

 Having used
 SpamPal + Bayesian plugin, PopFile  lately K9, they all performed a lot
 better even after the shortest training periods.

It's why I use Malwasher Pro. Can include multiple e-mail accounts,
but working off the same spam/legit training mail base. It also
includes white list/black list, dns blacklist, and user filtering
(including RegEx). Everything happens on the server so nothing gets
downloaded that I don't let through (though I have recently begun
letting some, to train BayesIT and give it a test. Won't be the same,
but will do something when I forget to run MWP first).

Now if there was a Mailwasher Plugin for TB, now that WOULD be nice.

You know, I think I'll e-mail Firetrust about it.  Wouldn't that be
cool?

--
Andrew


Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
On Windows XP, 5.1 Build: 2600

The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by 
evil men.
  --Plato (427 BC - 347 BC)



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spam Filter (was Re: Plugin Hotmail for TB3 ?)

2004-12-17 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Andrew,

  A reminder of what Andrew on TBUDL typed on:
  17 December 2004 at 22:15:37 GMT +0100

A You know, I think I'll e-mail Firetrust about it.  Wouldn't that be
A cool?

 His name is Nick Bolton, I have Mailwasher Pro as well and I totally agree with
 you, it's by far the best spam killer I've used... Apart from MDaemon that is.


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 Message composed on 17/12/2004 at 21:30 UTC   2004 - AWB
 Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2


PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt


pgplW28UiveAB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: SPAM filter with The Bat

2002-06-28 Thread Roelof Otten

Hallo Adam,

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:49:06 -0230GMT (28-6-02, 3:19 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

A How do you make a filter with dozens of addresses?

Place the addresses in your address book in one group.
What you've got to do is at the 'advanced' tab check 'address(es) must
be listed in the address book:' and see that you point to the correct
address book group.
The condition that you're checking on at the 'rule' tab must be a
rather general one (a dot present in the kludges or something like
that) since you only want to check for addresses.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat

2002-06-28 Thread Marcus Ohlstrm


On Friday, June 28, 2002, 03:19, Adam wrote:

 How do you make a filter with dozens of addresses?

Besides Roelof suggestion you can also make a .txt file with all
addresses and filter against that one. This method does however only
work with the Selective Download filter.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat

2002-06-27 Thread Adam

How do you make a filter with dozens of addresses?

-- 
Best regards,
 Adam



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Daniel,

@21 June 2002, 02:11:23 +0200 (01:11 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 In closing: Whenever spamcop.bat is run, it leaves a DOS window on my
 screen that has to be closed manually. I just solved this minor
 annoyance by putting @echo off as the first line in the template for
 Spamcop.bat.

Another method is to look at the Properties of the remaining
(finished) DOS window and check Close window when finished (is that
what it's called?). It will remember that setting for next time.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9En32OeQkq5KdzaARAta2AJ9fw6phYQK9TyL8RUB37PoyGCu34ACePh2N
pu5Zxx+0sHaRAep7OYvQTPs=
=nUOc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Daniel,

@18 June 2002, 14:38:09 +0200 (13:38 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thanks for the enlightenment!! :)

A pleasure :-)

 I'm now trying those Spamcop filters from the TB FAQ, but I'm not
 sure if they work as intended. Here's what I found:

 - Shouldn't the first stage filter (that creates a spam submission
 message) be set to manual only? Wouldn't it otherwise
 automatically respond to any incoming message that fulfills the
 criterion of having a '.' in its kludges?

Yes it would!

 Of course the Ctrl-Alt-S trigger is also set, but I don't know if
 that will override automatic execution..

Yes - it should be manual. It actually has the faoManualOnly flag
and should be pasted as a manual filter. Perhaps there's a bug in the
filter paste function?

 - The file to export to (C:\TEMP\EXPORT.TXT) was set correctly when
 I pasted the filter into the sorting office, but the Export to
 File action itself was not activated. Also, append to existing
 file was set, which I think will inadvertently report any
 previously sent spam along with the current spam message. I've
 changed that into overwrite. The export format was Text, is that
 alright? The quote kludges was Off, and I've turned that on.

Again, the filter source says:

faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges

All of which seem to have failed to import correctly :-(.

 I hope I made the correct changes (and if so, maybe the author of
 the filter should update this FAQ section?).

Who, me? (I am both the author of the filter and the maintainer of the
FAQ g). I'll have to annotate the filter to say that it may not
import correctly. What a pain!

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9Dy8qOeQkq5KdzaARApbiAJ9jwWWHNj3qTPICBhxDs1Gep8sc1wCgz/E9
rBYxrx5jNg0Y6fPYrgHDwjE=
=fgfM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Daniel,

@18 June 2002, 14:38:09 +0200 (13:38 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... The export format was Text, is that alright?

Just spotted this - no, it should be Unix. What a pig's ear! :-(

(not your fault at all).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9DzBLOeQkq5KdzaARAkojAJsElUfeLRqdmhFoD3pJecZ74m5KzQCeOmCg
FDh5Jf20b67aLu8R/quohFQ=
=orQC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Matthias Appel

Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:

MDP All of which seem to have failed to import correctly :-(.

Ehm. Someone else already mentioned (maybe on the german mailing
lists) that this problems are caused by some unwanted linebreaks on
the faq page.

1st Filter: after Actions
2nd Filter: after SaveTemplate

If you paste the filters in your text editor and remove the linebreaks
everything works fine.


-- 
Gruß,
 Matthias

Death is God's way of telling you not to be such a wise guy.



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Daniel,

@18 June 2002, 15:15:27 +0200 (14:15 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MDP Perhaps there's a bug in the filter paste function?

 Or I have missed something, so don't redo the filters just yet..

 I couldn't find a Paste button or anything like it in the Sorting
 Office, so I simply pressed Ctrl-V.

 Have I been stupid again?  O :-)

Nope. You done good! The How to says to use Ctrl-V. Actually, I just
tried it and it's completely hit and miss! Sometimes it pastes 100%
correctly, sometimes not. Here they are again:

,-=[ Ctrl-Alt-S Filter ]-
  BeginFilter
  Name: Submit spam to SpamCop
  Source: \Inbox
  Target: \Trash
  CopyFolder: none
  MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Actions: 
faMarkRead,faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges,faoManualOnly,faoHotKey,faoSaveUnix
  NewAddr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  NewTemplate: %put\3D\27C:\5Ctemp\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A
  ExtFile: C:\temp\export.txt
  HotKey: 49235
  EndFilter
`

,-=[ Spamcop reply Intercept ]-
  BeginFilter
  Name: SpamCop AutoResponder
  Source: \Inbox
  Target: \Trash
  CopyFolder: none
  MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  MainSet: 20SpamCop has accepted
  Actions: faMarkRead,faExport,faExternal,faoExportOver,faoWaitCompletion
  ExtCmd: C:\temp\spamcop.bat
  ExtFile: C:\temp\spamcop.bat
  SaveTemplate:
  
\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*\22\0D\0A
  EndFilter
`

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9DzWXOeQkq5KdzaARArGwAJwPbuAPIVvbF+dYXvRAC5FSjHTJWQCfcvV0
kmKjg1WbnrCc9qthzDMCHuM=
=nt7q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Marck,

@18 June 2002, 14:28:53 +0100 Marck D Pearlstone wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Here they are again:

The MainSet property is wrong:

   MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

,-=[ Try again :-( ]-
  BeginFilter
  Name: Submit spam to SpamCop
  Source: \Inbox
  Target: \Trash
  CopyFolder: none
  MainSet: 40.
  
Actions:faMarkRead,faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges,faoManualOnly,faoHotKey,faoSaveUnix
  NewAddr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  NewTemplate: %put\3D\27C:\5Ctemp\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A
  ExtFile: C:\temp\export.txt
  HotKey: 49235
  EndFilter
`

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9Dze5OeQkq5KdzaARAlREAKCuxopw2r2KswuyPSf+91aAG7Ov1ACgpwJi
81q8QoxhTJtUJ/RuQs/ZveU=
=tYXV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Daniel,

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002 at 3:35:11 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):

DvRC When I try to enter a high-ascii character using
DvRC Alt-nnn, the Bat doesn't enter the character but instead performs all
DvRC sorts of system functions (menu's pop up, etc). Do you know of a way
DvRC to turn this off?

Is there a small chance you have turned 'NumLock' off and don't keep
'Alt' pressed while trying to enter the character codes?
I can create exactly the same behavior you're describing if I do so ...
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

Were there fewer fools, knaves would starve. - Anonymous



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Thomas F

Hello Marck,

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:28:53 +0100 GMT (18/06/02, 20:28 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

MDP ,-=[ Spamcop reply Intercept ]-

[...]
MDP   SaveTemplate:
MDP   
\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*\22\0D\0A

This is the line break I advised a member on the German list to
delete. You might want to mention this in the FAQ.

I have a new problem with SpamCop: Instead of a web page with the
header info and the choice which postmasters to send the spam report
to, the second filter now opens a web page that suggests Upgrade to a
paid SpamCop account. What is that about, I wonder?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Thomas,

@18 June 2002, 20:53:15 +0700 (14:53 UK time) Thomas F wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MDP   SaveTemplate:
MDP   
\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*\22\0D\0A

 This is the line break I advised a member on the German list to
 delete. You might want to mention this in the FAQ.

I won't need to - I'll be republishing it without the *space* after
the SaveTemplate causing auto-wrap!

 I have a new problem with SpamCop: Instead of a web page with the
 header info and the choice which postmasters to send the spam report
 to, the second filter now opens a web page that suggests Upgrade to
 a paid SpamCop account. What is that about, I wonder?

As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
notification message for free accounts :-(.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D0DWOeQkq5KdzaARAp93AJ0Z9KRYy7PipdmERq2kMZOOkFDf1gCfVCA7
/sM9buvYBCpJOKjjzzdbyIw=
=ZRUY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 Nope. You done good! The How to says to use Ctrl-V. Actually, I just
 tried it and it's completely hit and miss! Sometimes it pastes 100%
 correctly, sometimes not. Here they are again:

snip

Call me stupid... but I cannot get those to work... I've pasted the
filter into my filters list, and when I got to run the CTRL ALT S, it
exports the text file fine... but never sends anything... I've checked
on the server, and the sent items, but nothing... what am I missing?

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 09:29:09 -0500 (15:29 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Call me stupid... but I cannot get those to work... I've pasted the
 filter into my filters list, and when I got to run the CTRL ALT S,
 it exports the text file fine... but never sends anything... I've
 checked on the server, and the sent items, but nothing... what am I
 missing?

Pass - try doing a Ctrl-C on the filter in the filter list then a
Ctrl-V into a replay to this message so we can see what you've
actually got in the filter. It works fine for those not stumbling over
bad wrapping.

Actually, that may be the problem anyway: if your viewer wrapped the
lines then the pasted filter may be messed up.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D0YAOeQkq5KdzaARAlRHAJ9nS98zPuSQZ90h1QmeDCiiOkmGXwCfWVNv
KZNotDz1lVeP1jdXTs2BBuw=
=ML0a
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 Pass - try doing a Ctrl-C on the filter in the filter list then a
 Ctrl-V into a replay to this message so we can see what you've
 actually got in the filter. It works fine for those not stumbling over
 bad wrapping.

Oddly enough, it was the first thing I checked for, pasted it into an
external editor, removed wrappings from the settings, and everything
was fine... but here it is:

BeginFilter
Name: Submit spam to SpamCop
Active: 1
Source: \\\Spam
Target: \\\Spam\Forwarded Spam
CopyFolder: none
MainSet: 40.
Actions: 
faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges,faoManualOnly,faoHotKey,faoSaveUnix
AddGroups: 
DelGroups: 
ForwardTemplate: 
ConfirmTemplate: 
ReplyTemplate: 
FwdAddr: 
RedirectAddr: 
NewAddr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NewTemplate: %put\3D\27C:\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A
ExtCmd: 
ExtFile: C:\export.txt
ExtractDir: 
ColourGroup: default
AddAddrItems: afiFrom,
DelAddrItems: afiFrom,
HotKey: 49235
IsOfColour: default
SizeBigger: 0
SizeSmaller: 0
AgeOlder: 0
AgeNewer: 0
InAddrPos: 0
OutAddrPos: 0
InAddrGroups: 
NoAddrGroups: 
KillFile: 
KillMethod: 0
SaveTemplate: 
SndFile: 
SysSound: 0
SoundTime: 0:00-0:00
AllowTime: 0:00-0:00
EndFilter

TIA :)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 09:45:04 -0500 (15:45 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Oddly enough, it was the first thing I checked for, pasted it into an
 external editor, removed wrappings from the settings, and everything
 was fine... but here it is:

 BeginFilter
 Name: Submit spam to SpamCop
 Active: 1
 Source: \\\Spam
 Target: \\\Spam\Forwarded Spam
 CopyFolder: none
 MainSet: 40.
 Actions: 
faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges,faoManualOnly,faoHotKey,faoSaveUnix
 AddGroups:
 DelGroups:
 ForwardTemplate:
 ConfirmTemplate:
 ReplyTemplate:
 FwdAddr:
 RedirectAddr:
 NewAddr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 NewTemplate: %put\3D\27C:\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A
 ExtCmd:
 ExtFile: C:\export.txt

snip

... and it's perfect (apart from not marking the spam as Read). I
have no idea why that wouldn't create a message for you. It should be
queued in the outbox of whichever account is active and sent on the
next send cycle.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D0t9OeQkq5KdzaARAub1AJ4iW2Je3lUAdx5Lk8B/JM+1dutvuACdGXHP
rHEjNgaC768mT4MuDGQOlqA=
=/8j0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

snip

 ... and it's perfect (apart from not marking the spam as Read). I
 have no idea why that wouldn't create a message for you. It should be
 queued in the outbox of whichever account is active and sent on the
 next send cycle.

Is the fact that it's a common folder have any affect?  Plus it's not
marking it as read, because all mail that has been marked as spam by
the server gets dumped into a common folder, and marked as read... I
then process at a later time... would that affect it as well?

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 10:07:31 -0500 (16:07 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... and it's perfect (apart from not marking the spam as Read). I
 have no idea why that wouldn't create a message for you. It should be
 queued in the outbox of whichever account is active and sent on the
 next send cycle.

 Is the fact that it's a common folder have any affect?

Yes Yes YES! (sorry - didn't mean to yell, just got excited). You need
to enhance the template to include a %ACCOUNT=main to provide a
sending account!

 ... dumped into a common folder, and marked as read... I then
 process at a later time... would that affect it as well?

No.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D1LXOeQkq5KdzaARAhQiAKDL6NGvX/bkxDnGMgq83ADog6nCBACeMGPe
OXGGZumH0ZCUts+VAtqoSQE=
=Roaf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 Is the fact that it's a common folder have any affect?

 Yes Yes YES! (sorry - didn't mean to yell, just got excited). You need
 to enhance the template to include a %ACCOUNT=main to provide a
 sending account!

Modified... now I just have to wait for the inevitable spam ;)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 10:38:29 -0500 (16:38 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Is the fact that it's a common folder have any affect?

 Yes Yes YES! (sorry - didn't mean to yell, just got excited). You need
 to enhance the template to include a %ACCOUNT=main to provide a
 sending account!

 Modified... now I just have to wait for the inevitable spam ;)

... or retrieve an earlier one from the Forwarded Spam folder ...
;-)

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D1ZSOeQkq5KdzaARAttUAJ9I337Is5JBIR9e4/FwLxa164IOnQCfZeaK
ZhYYT1KdxXN+Eqc/9CMj3OA=
=EGyS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 Modified... now I just have to wait for the inevitable spam ;)

 ... or retrieve an earlier one from the Forwarded Spam folder ...
 ;-)

True... just be resubmitting it... just cancel the post

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 10:52:32 -0500 (16:52 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... or retrieve an earlier one from the Forwarded Spam folder ...
 ;-)

 True... just be resubmitting it... just cancel the post

... I thought we'd determined that the submission didn't happen
because no account was specified to send it from ... or did you do it
by hand anyway?

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D1gpOeQkq5KdzaARAoBAAKCxOeRTqHdvBROal/Mv9SkWhwQdagCcCgW5
mjJWronHxXK0CD2TZqcDV54=
=oIDf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 ... I thought we'd determined that the submission didn't happen
 because no account was specified to send it from ... or did you do it
 by hand anyway?

I did them all as a batch by hand... using ALT SHIFT F5, then putting
in the SpamCop address... the same way I've been doing it since
signing up. Just tested it again *with* %ACCOUNT='accountname' in the
template for the rule, and it still didn't send... any other ideas? or
did I put it in the wrong place?

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 11:01:49 -0500 (17:01 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... I thought we'd determined that the submission didn't happen
 because no account was specified to send it from ... or did you do it
 by hand anyway?

 I did them all as a batch by hand... using ALT SHIFT F5, then putting
 in the SpamCop address... the same way I've been doing it since
 signing up. Just tested it again *with* %ACCOUNT='accountname' in the
 template for the rule, and it still didn't send... any other ideas? or
 did I put it in the wrong place?

Dunno. I have mine in the create message template that already as
put='c:\temp\export.txt' in it. I use this construct myself because
I filter my spam to an account called Anti-Spam that has no related
POP3/SMTP servers.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D1qZOeQkq5KdzaARAoVbAJ90G9Qr2sbC7x74TS9o8IQ8hCCpkwCgj4q6
SGJIWwEyMru/DqAwsknyQVc=
=Z7GH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 Dunno. I have mine in the create message template that already as
 put='c:\temp\export.txt' in it. I use this construct myself because
 I filter my spam to an account called Anti-Spam that has no related
 POP3/SMTP servers.

That is where I put it, but no luck still... I guess an extra key
combo isn't going to kill me ;)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

@18 June 2002, 11:13:08 -0500 (17:13 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 That is where I put it, but no luck still... I guess an extra key
 combo isn't going to kill me ;)

Okay. Next step. Shut down and restart your system. I actually
submitted a bug to the BugTraq about Create message filters not
working at one point. After the next reboot, they worked perfectly and
I could never replicate the problem again. The bug was removed from
the traqqer without resolution.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D16TOeQkq5KdzaARAiRrAKDcUHaRxzDV5Z6tzOjPKyoT3zuMbwCfVyvF
XUARQxKOq9WwkUcBFczT3+4=
=BQGz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 Okay. Next step. Shut down and restart your system. I actually
 submitted a bug to the BugTraq about Create message filters not
 working at one point. After the next reboot, they worked perfectly and
 I could never replicate the problem again. The bug was removed from
 the traqqer without resolution.

Heh... I'll be damned... that worked fine.  Nice lil' filter works...
just going to put the other one in too, and I should be all okay to
handle spam nearly automatically ;)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hi Marck.

At 11:33 AM on Tuesday, June 18, 2002 you wrote the
following about [SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher
program)]:

MDP [...] You need to enhance the template to include a
MDP %ACCOUNT=main to provide a sending account! [/...]

 What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V1.60q/W2K_SP2
ICQ 41116329



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Jan Rifkinson wrote...

 Hi Marck.

MDP [...] You need to enhance the template to include a
MDP %ACCOUNT=main to provide a sending account! [/...]

  What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before.

%ACCOUNT is a macro... just replace main with the name of the
account you wish to send from... its used in templates.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jan,

@18 June 2002, 13:08:27 -0400 (18:08 UK time) Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MDP [...] You need to enhance the template to include a
MDP %ACCOUNT=main to provide a sending account! [/...]

  What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before.

main was just a for example. Mine is %ACCOUNT=Marck. Jonathan
knew what I meant, fortunately.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D3NTOeQkq5KdzaARAguXAJ9XwBEfbjwnX+ErBY3G5wXQcpCB5wCfSniv
I3UbXzgwST4muk5DAn1+QoM=
=61S+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Thomas F

Hello Marck,

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:16:51 +0100 GMT (18/06/02, 21:16 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

MDP As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
MDP http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
MDP notification message for free accounts :-(.

Thanks. Works. :-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody
appreciates how difficult it was.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Thomas,

@18 June 2002, 03:16:11 +0700 (21:16 UK time) Thomas F wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MDP As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
MDP http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
MDP notification message for free accounts :-(.

 Thanks. Works. :-)

... but not for paid accounts (like mine) :-(

This does though g:

http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D5g6OeQkq5KdzaARAs8yAKCI+rvuGwecjTVsXmcw5DpGqyw75gCfcEzI
3WKkC1EcL3szXoUHavsigL8=
=f7r1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Paul Cartwright

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 4:29 PM, you wrote:



MDP As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
MDP http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
MDP notification message for free accounts :-(.

 Thanks. Works. :-)

MDP ... but not for paid accounts (like mine) :-(

MDP This does though g:

MDP http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*


one more time, could you reply with the entire correct filter for that
notifcation message for PAID accounts, I'd like to paste the entire
correct filter and start over ;)

thanks,

/ Paul
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPQ+a8j3ZlJQqDEkFEQJybACgsh9ofbOIMzZlSy/DEtVnImTRf6QAn2e4
y9RzAVnf2zNAftDglU8AU556
=9wgI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Paul,

@18 June 2002, 16:41:19 -0400 (21:41 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 one more time, could you reply with the entire correct filter for that
 notifcation message for PAID accounts, I'd like to paste the entire
 correct filter and start over ;)

,-=[ Submit - all flavours ]-
BeginFilter
Name: Submit spam to SpamCop
Source: \Inbox
Target: \Trash
CopyFolder: none
MainSet: 40.
Actions:faMarkRead,faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges,faoManualOnly,faoHotKey,faoSaveUnix
NewAddr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NewTemplate: %put\3D\27C:\5Ctemp\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A
ExtFile: C:\temp\export.txt
HotKey: 49235
EndFilter
`

,-=[ Pick up reply - all flavours ]-
BeginFilter
Name: SpamCop AutoResponder
Active: 1
Source: \Inbox
Target: \Trash
CopyFolder: none
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MainSet: 20SpamCop has accepted
Actions: faMarkRead,faExport,faExternal,faoExportOver,faoWaitCompletion
ExtCmd: C:\temp\spamcop.bat
ExtFile: C:\temp\spamcop.bat
SaveTemplate:\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0A%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*\22\0D\0A
EndFilter
`

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D6DZOeQkq5KdzaARAoTGAJ97SMC3dhwURVXRWchRaeaxLtGNagCdHVn3
i51C8N0NcA95n12w4XCipdM=
=rju6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Paul Cartwright

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 5:06 PM, you wrote:


MDP ,-=[ Pick up reply - all flavours ]-
MDP BeginFilter
MDP Name: SpamCop AutoResponder
MDP Active: 1
MDP Source: \Inbox
MDP Target: \Trash
MDP CopyFolder: none
MDP MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP MainSet: 20SpamCop has accepted
MDP Actions: faMarkRead,faExport,faExternal,faoExportOver,faoWaitCompletion
MDP ExtCmd: C:\temp\spamcop.bat
MDP ExtFile: C:\temp\spamcop.bat
MDP 
SaveTemplate:\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0A%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*\22\0D\0A
MDP EndFilter


but I don't see that change you were talking about. Isn't
this the change area:
MDP 22http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*\22\0D\0A

here is your reply with that info:
 Thanks. Works. :-)

... but not for paid accounts (like mine) :-(

This does though g:

http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*



- -so, should I replace: http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*

with your line:  http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*

or am I looking in the wrong place?




/ Paul
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPQ+m4z3ZlJQqDEkFEQJ7ZACfcUqiI7A94NIP0v7xu5DAF+dqjI4An0Vd
bjpMunIb2cet6A3eMbO5e3sS
=Rlk1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Paul,

@18 June 2002, 17:32:14 -0400 (22:32 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*

 - -so, should I replace: http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*

 with your line:  http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*

 or am I looking in the wrong place?

It's a chalk and cheese issue..

http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*; is how a string looks when intended
to be used as part of a copy/paste of an entire filter into the
sorting office.

http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*; is exactly the same, but what it looks
like in the template in the filter. It's there for you to manually
paste into an existing filter.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9D6pSOeQkq5KdzaARArigAJ9mroLqVk6jgFMvByhBPshm50s7PACfVV08
A/kKJVULq5iCz6on2/qxVcg=
=Ryws
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hi Marck.

At 1:52 PM on Tuesday, June 18, 2002 you wrote the following
about [SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)]:

  What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before.

MDP main was just a for example. Mine is
MDP %ACCOUNT=Marck. Jonathan knew what I meant,
MDP fortunately.

  Whew. :-)

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V1.60q/W2K_SP2
ICQ 41116329



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

2002-06-18 Thread Paul Cartwright


On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 5:46 PM, you wrote:

MDP It's a chalk and cheese issue..

MDP http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*; is how a string looks when intended
MDP to be used as part of a copy/paste of an entire filter into the
MDP sorting office.

MDP http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*; is exactly the same, but what it looks
MDP like in the template in the filter. It's there for you to manually
MDP paste into an existing filter.

I wondered about that, which is why I asked. I noticed those paste
lines, tried to setup the filter manually with that info, but it
wasn't easy! Now I know WHY :)



/ Paul
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat

2002-06-16 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)

On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:34:55 PM, Carlo Revelli wrote:

 Do you know if there is a way to create a filter with a huge list
 of domain names (and not only with e-mail addresses)? How?

Not using the regular Inbox filters.  You can load a file for
Selective Download filtering, but I think that this would be a very
slow way of sorting out spam.

Is the spam domain list is the best approach? Spammers change the
email addresses and domains regularly, so most of the domains listed
will no longer be used, and just slow your filters down. I rely on a
small number of rules to delete 90% of the spam I get - I am confident
enough of them to use them as Kill rules in a Selective Download
filter, although I use an Ignore filter to hold suspicious messages.
Those that get through I send to Spamcop, and adjust my filters if
required.

I am sure you can guess the kind if words to filter on - my kill
filter includes:

btamail.net.cn
2002 Gov Grants
spinformillions
email-4-prizes.com
Viagra

Julian

-- 
  Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 




Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SPAM filter with The Bat

2002-06-16 Thread Costas Papadopoulos

Hello Julian,

Sunday, June 16, 2002, 7:59:22 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
 On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:34:55 PM, Carlo Revelli wrote:

 Do you know if there is a way to create a filter with a huge list
 of domain names (and not only with e-mail addresses)? How?

One  fairly  successful method is to filter to a spamtrap folder all
emails  that  do  NOT  have  your address in the To field. I usually
isolate one or two such emails per day.

-- 
Best regards,
 Costasmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Spam filter

2001-11-14 Thread Chema Berian

Hello Listers, 

On  Wed,  14 Nov 2001, at 18:19:00 [GMT -0600] (which was 1:19 where I
live) Joseph wrote:

JN Is it to filter out known spam sending addresses, or to filter out
JN mail  that  has  or  does not have a particular string? Has anyone
JN here  had  much  success?  I  need  to  have  a zero risk of false
JN positives.

I  think  most of us filter good addresses and assume rest are SPAM.
Of  course  is  necessary to *not* delete assumed SPAM for a few days,
and have a look searching for good addresses to save.

--
Chema Berian 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spanish GDUTB Moderator  
Subscriptions: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! 1.53t on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

TB  Tip  of  the Moment: Each account within The Bat! can have its own
settings  for  Microsoft  Dial-Up  Networking.  Check  out  Account |
Properties | Network page.

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Spam filter

2001-11-14 Thread Brian Clark

Hi Joseph,

@ 7:19:00 PM on 11/14/2001, Joseph N. wrote:

JN What is the concept behind filtering for spam?

This has been answered somewhat, but for the record:

http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl%40thebat.dutaint.com/msg17609.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=andformat=shortconfig=tbudl_thebat_dutaint_comrestrict=exclude=words=sherlock+filter

-Brian


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: SPAM Filter

2001-09-10 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hi Raj,

Historians believe that Monday, September 10, 2001 at 16:05 GMT +0530
was when, Raj [R] typed the following:

R I just wanted to check whether the filter will check for all
R addresses for a particular entry or only the first one.

I use that as well.  TB looks at all of them, just like the %AB
macros.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/8 under Windows 98 4.10 Build  A

Ok, who is General Relativity, and what did he do with Sir Newton?


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re: Spam Filter

2000-12-12 Thread David Elliott

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi John,

On 12 December 2000 at 19:48:31 +1100 (which was 08:48 where I live) words
of wisdom emanated from John Phillips.

JP  Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam?  These days I get
JP  so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days, send me money  make
JP  yourself rich, etc., Viagra without a prescription (I sure could do
JP  with some in any case g), etc. etc.

JP  Any one had any success in getting rid of these pests?

Have a look at http://spamcops.net they might be able to help you.

- --
Regards,
 David

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
|  David Elliott  |  Software Engineer  |  PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
Look --- A tag line with no meaning.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered.

iQA/AwUBOjXwqfmK8eZlD0U0EQKElACfcbLvdwWxBoGSwljzSNz/JV4IJrcAni0J
vqcCamLuKnULAD7YCnothOgr
=+C5j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam Filter

2000-12-12 Thread Beat Strasser

Hi John

  Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam?  These days I get
  so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days, send me money  make
  yourself rich, etc., Viagra without a prescription (I sure could do
  with some in any case g), etc. etc.

  Any one had any success in getting rid of these pests?

I've just programmed a mail filter which does his job quite well. It's
a  perl  script  that  is  executed  each  time when a mail arrives. A
message  is  treated  as  spam if the sender's ip is listed in ORBS or
MAPS. So, it does for each time two requests (example ip: 1.2.3.4):

  host 4.3.2.1.blackholes.mail-abuse.org
  host 4.3.2.1.relays.orbs.org

If  the  ip  127.0.0.2  is  returned, the probability is high that the
message  is  spam.  Because I don't delete the message, but send it to
another address, I take no risks.

Additionally, I check the subjects for some suspect strings.

So,  I  let  a  script  filter my mails *before* they arrive in my pop
account. 

So short,
Beat

-- 
  Using The Bat! 1.47 Halloween Edition under Windows 95 4.0 Build 950 

-- 
PGP public key available:
Send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
get it on keyservers: 0x4E0B0777 (DH/DSS)

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam Filter

2000-12-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:48:31 +1100, John Phillips wrote these
words of wisdom:

[...]
JP  Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam?  These days I get
JP  so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days, send me money  make
JP  yourself rich, etc., Viagra without a prescription (I sure could do
JP  with some in any case g), etc. etc.

JP  Any one had any success in getting rid of these pests?

It looks like the FAQ pages need a word on spam filtering. I'll have to
look into that. I'll give a summary of what I'd write here:

Maintaining spam filters to delete spam from your inbox is difficult
since spam artists change their addresses frequently and their
techniques of spamming vary. This will take too much out of you and the
spammers will win I guess. Furthermore you've done nothing to help
actually fight spam. Deleting spam at the server level seems nice
because the spam actually doesn't reach your inbox. Again, this has two
problems. Firstly, the headers of each message has to be checked which
takes time, so the concern of saving bandwidth isn't really achieved. You
also have the same problems maintaining the spam filters and you can
only filter based on characteristics of the headers and not the message
bodies. Be that as it may, there are many anti-spam shareware
applications available and these are updated frequently by the
developers. See http://winfiles.cnet.com/apps/nt/mail-antispam.html
for some.

The method Marck and I (among others) have been using is very effective
in two ways. The first is that the method requires minimal maintenance.
The second is that you can examine the spam, if you like, and report
them so that the spammers can have a little misery as well. We filter
spam by exclusion, the principle here being that if we can actually
filter all messages that we know are legitimate, then the rest of
messages must be spam. This simple principle is amazingly accurate.

Spammers tend to send BCC's of their spams to their victims. So we know
now that there's an overwhelming characteristic about spam in that it's
almost never addressed directly to you. I do receive the occasional spam
message addressed directly to me but they're few and far between and
tolerable. :=) So:

a) Create filters for all your family members, friends and associates
who send e-mail to you. You may have already done so.

b) Create filters for all your discussion list messages and newsletter
type messages. These you may have largely been created already. This
part takes some time to refine since a lot of these messages are not
addressed directly to you. If you don't create filters for them, they'll
end up in your spam folder.

c) The penultimate filter in your filter list should be one that
filters, to the inbox, all messages that are addressed directly to you.
This basically will catch the occasional legitimate message that you
haven't created a filter for.

Filter string: 'your email address'
Location: 'recipient'
Presence: 'yes'


d) The last filter should be one that moves all messages not yet
filtered by the previous filter rules to a special folder ... I call it
my spam folder. This folder will contain only BCC'd messages or messages
not addressed directly to you.

filter string: 'e'
Location: 'anywhere'
Presence: 'yes'

If you wish to actively fight spam and wish not to actually learn how to
trace these pests you definitely should take a look at
http://spamcops.net. It does all the tracing for you in a flash.

If you wish to learn how to trace them yourself there's a lot of info on
the internet in that regard, but I personally suggest looking at the
freeware application 'Sam Spade' http://www.samspade.org/ssw/. It
provides the tools you need to trace these pesty characters and the
documentation is great. Their homepage contains all the application
documentation which gives some tutorials on how to examine spam message
headers.

PS// I'll need to keep this one for personal transmission to anyone who
may ask the question again.

- --
@~@@~@
 | A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA]  |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@

'Funny, only sensible people agree with me.'
__
TB! v1.48 Beta/11 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOjYekVfJ62ArBxfiEQJsWwCgyoTkuqD6sZ6o6RzMxWswn8ordsUAn0bO
4f/wJ4MvI/E7PdhLbVbg0M/H
=okMb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL 

Re: Spam Filter

2000-12-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello John,

   In a post time stamped  re: "Spam Filter" you wrote:

John Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam?

   I'm sure you will get a lot of suggestions on this -- some more
   ingenious than others -- but one simple way is to filter out any
   email that arrives in your inbox that *isn't* addressed to you.

   TB!'s filtering system is very malleable  you will always find
   substantial, good humored  patient support on this list.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition
PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D

Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam Filter

2000-12-12 Thread Brian Clark


(ACM == "A. Curtis Martin") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

ACM The method Marck and I (among others) have been using is very
ACM effective in two ways. The first is that the method requires
ACM minimal maintenance. The second is that you can examine the spam,
ACM if you like, and report them so that the spammers can have a
ACM little misery as well. We filter spam by exclusion, the principle
ACM here being that if we can actually filter all messages that we
ACM know are legitimate, then the rest of messages must be spam. This
ACM simple principle is amazingly accurate.

I'll say! Since Marck suggested this to me a few weeks ago, very
little SPAM makes it to my Inbox. I'll bet I've seen only one that
made it into my Inbox since I implemented this filtering method.

It'll take a few tries to make sure you're filtering the _known_ stuff
-- that is meant for you -- though. After that, it /is/ pretty darn
accurate. However, I'd suggest not deleting stuff from the server
before it gets to you unless you have a lot of faith. I just redirect
it into a SPAM folder and check it every so often.

So far, I can usually just check the folder and hit Ctrl+Del ;-)

-Brian
--
Behold, the power of cheese!

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-09-01 Thread tracer

Hello ztrader,
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 20:27:56 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, August 27, 2000, 10:27:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
ztrader wrote:



 Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote:

MDP 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass:
MDP Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]' location "Kludges"
MDP presence "Yes".

 Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the
 string right out of the 'strings' box:

 '[X-SBClass: Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]'

 I had the unfortunate opportunity to test it on a message, containing
 the following headers (not a complete list of headers):

 X-SBRule: Pattern Match (Money) (Score: 3800)
 X-SBRule: Pattern Match (Work From Home) (Score: 800)
 X-SBRule: Pattern Match (Other Patterns) (Score: 1525)
 X-SBRule: Pattern Match (Spam Phone #) (Score: 1200)
 X-SBClass: Blocked
 ^^

 The message was not sent to the spam folder, as I had hoped, even
 though it should have a match. Might I need additional parenthesis, or
 is there another reason this is not working? Is the : a special
 character, perhaps?

When this problem is sorted out, any chance to get something like that
in the docs, Faq or as standard installed...

 Thanks for your help,

  ztradermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Best regards,
 
tracer


-- 

Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-28 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello ztrader,


On  Monday, August 28, 2000  at  07:40:48 GMT -0700 (which was 7:40 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:

 For a simple OR function, would we have:

 '[str A]|[str B]'

 I think you may be getting confused here.  You don't need the
 apostrophes or the square brackets.  Just type your strings in.  This
 is why I think the | method for ORing to strings can be ambiguous.

 is it OK to put spaces outside brackets as:

 ' [str A] | [str B] '

 I'm not sure about the spaces.  Again, this is another reason I find
 the | method to be ambiguous.

 (I understand the ' chr is needed - true?)

 False.

z This might be the best example to show how complex notation goes in
z TB:
z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

 The problem I see here is getting AND and OR to work in a *single*
 expression. How does one do that? Is it possible to write the above as
 a single, one-line expression?

 As far as I know, no.  In a *single* string set, you could only do the
 C and D and (E or F).  See my example in a previous post to this
 thread.

 The suggeston for implementing this split up the parts into simple
 strings that could be entered as AND's or OR's. If one has an
 expression that needs an AND or an OR *within* the string,

 Just be careful here.  You can not have a single string that says
 something like,

 (Tom or Jane) Doe

 Instead you would need to break it up into either

  Tom|Jane AND Doe
 or
  Tom Doe|Jane Doe

 it seems critical to have exactly the right characters ['",etc to
 make it work. I am trying to understand how to include these chrs
 correctly so it works.

 See above.

 Also, I see a box marked "Regular expressions" in the "options"
 section. Does this have to be checked to get any complex expressions
 to work?

 Nope.  Regular expressions are complex, but they are much different
 than the "simple" search strings you've been looking for.


 


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-28 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Januk,

On 28 August 2000 at 12:26:37 GMT -0700 (which was 20:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":

 For a simple OR function, would we have:

 '[str A]|[str B]'

JA I think you may be getting confused here. You don't need the
JA apostrophes or the square brackets. Just type your strings in.
JA This is why I think the | method for ORing to strings can be
JA ambiguous.

..  or  you  do.  The help is also ambiguous here. Square brackets are
used  to  delimit  contiguous  strings. Apostrophes are supposed to be
used to delimited complete arguments which contain special characters.
It all adds to the ambiguity.

 is it OK to put spaces outside brackets as:

 ' [str A] | [str B] '

JA  I'm not sure about the spaces.  Again, this is another reason I find
JA  the | method to be ambiguous.

I  am  pretty  sure  about  the spaces - they'll mess it up for sure -
especially  when  used  in  conjunction  with  apostrophes  and square
brackets.

 (I understand the ' chr is needed - true?)

JA  False.

... or true, depending which bit of the Help file you're reading.

z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

 The  problem I see here is getting AND and OR to work in a *single*
 expression. How does one do that? Is it possible to write the above
 as a single, one-line expression?

JA  As far as I know, no.  In a *single* string set, you could only do the
JA  C and D and (E or F).  See my example in a previous post to this
JA  thread.

Absolutely.  ZTrader  -  Januk's  example  was *crystal* clear on this
point.

 The suggeston for implementing this split up the parts into simple
 strings that could be entered as AND's or OR's. If one has an
 expression that needs an AND or an OR *within* the string,

JA  Just be careful here.  You can not have a single string that says
JA  something like,

JA  (Tom or Jane) Doe

JA  Instead you would need to break it up into either

JA   Tom|Jane AND Doe
JA  or
JA   Tom Doe|Jane Doe

... which could end up as [Tom Doe]|[Jane Doe].

 it seems critical to have exactly the right characters ['",etc to
 make it work. I am trying to understand how to include these chrs
 correctly so it works.

JA  See above.

..  or  refer  to  the  "Help"  references on 'Using special syntax in
signal strings'.

For  the  sake  of  clarity,  here  is  some of the help text with the
salient points underlined:

Pipe   character   “|”  means  that  signal  string  contains  two
alternatives. For example, string John|Jack means that search will
  ^
be  successful  if  John  or  Jack  (or both) will be found in the
specified location.

Square  brackets  [  ]  mean  that  text  embraced by them must be
searched  as  a  phrase. i.e. search for [Jack] will be successful
for  sentence  “Jack is a good man”, but not for “ Jackson guitars
are very good for beginners”.

Text   embraced   in   quotation  marks  is  case-sensitive,  i.e.
“Internet”  will be found in the sentence “The Internet is growing
very rapidly” but not in “InTeRnEt RuLeZ”

The  text  containing  special characters mentioned above, must be
   ^^^
embraced  in  single quotes, like this: ‘["New" generation mailing
^^^
list]’

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 

 If a man is standing in the middle of the forest speaking
and there is no woman around to hear him...is he still wrong?

TB! v1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness!

iQA/AwUBOarDYjnkJKuSnc2gEQIIigCgnAlZTAOSF0S4Kkp5mw+opKKaXGkAoOrQ
LJVk0JtdQeQT0+HeCYVgyvm+
=o7uG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi ztrader,

On 27 August 2000 at 06:32:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:32 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":

JA  I  think  your  filter  string is probably to blame here. I find
JA  using the pipe symbol for OR is ambiguous.

z Are  you  suggesting  that  it  does not work as an OR, or is there
z something wrong with the string I was using?

I never use it myself - it's very hard to get it to work right.

JA  Try the following:

JA  String Location Presence
JA  X-SBClass: Blocked Kludges  Yes

JA  Then click on the Alternative tab and click on Add Set

z Perhaps I was confused by reading help. I thought adding another set
z implied an AND function, as per the example in help. I note that there
z are two places to put in multiple strings, though. Is the
z 'Alternatives' section an implied OR for the sets?

Exactly.

z If so, what is done if there are multiple strings in *both* sections?
z How are the multiple ANDs and ORs combined?

Use  the  "Add" button on the front page to add "AND" strings. Use the
Alternatives  page  and  the  "Add set" button to add "OR" strings. To
have "AND" tests /within/ an "OR" additional set, use Alt-Ins

Clear? Probably not! ;-).

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 

 Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns
because they taste funny?


TB! v1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness!

iQA/AwUBOakcmDnkJKuSnc2gEQKfdwCgxpKuQaLCwWgrdhpj65Az++J1zJwAoMN2
BYVraHq+BeoxFO5MuzvBmwqS
=FArV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi ztrader,

On 27 August 2000 at 07:44:08 GMT -0700 (which was 15:44 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":

MDP Exactly.

z OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the help file.

The  help  file is another issue. Sometimes it gets updated, sometimes
it doesn't. The main help for TB is right here on the UDL.

MDP To  have  "AND"  tests  /within/  an  "OR"  additional  set, use
MDP Alt-Ins

MDP Clear? Probably not! ;-).

z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:

z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

z If so, I'm a bit hazy (that fog again :-) on how to do it.

Well,  'A'  is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the first
Alternative  set  while the second alternative set is far more complex
containing three match strings (added with Alt-Ins) of which the third
is  a composite string with the '|' (pipe) character to create the '(E
or F)' condition - if you can make it work!

I  would say that once a filter gets that complex I would tend to make
two simpler filters that work in sequence to do the whole job.

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 

 Headline - Panda Mating Fails; Veterinarian Takes Over


TB! v1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness!

iQA/AwUBOaktZDnkJKuSnc2gEQJiBgCghtmPYEEs344KKSsD/cMKaNSTv44Anjnx
rAgoLuxshaU22QH8jgbHTFQf
=SxuJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hallo ztrader,

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:44:08 -0700 GMT (27/08/2000, 22:44 +0800 GMT),
ztrader wrote:

z OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the help file.

Yep.

z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:

z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

No need to get acquainted with good old George Boole:

- All the conditions you "add" on the first tab ("rule") are "AND" to
the fist condition.

- All the conditions you 'add" on the second tab ("alternatives") are
"OR" to all other conditions, including the ones in the first tab and
each others.

... and the interface design is unclear. I'm thinking about
suggestions how to improve that. Any ideas?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hallo Marck,

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:01:49 +0100 GMT (27/08/2000, 23:01 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:

MDP Well,  'A'  is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the first
MDP Alternative  set  while the second alternative set is far more complex
MDP containing three match strings (added with Alt-Ins) of which the third
MDP is  a composite string with the '|' (pipe) character to create the '(E
MDP or F)' condition - if you can make it work!

Sorry... could you translate this into English? ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Ming-Li

Hi ztrader  Marck,

z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:

z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

 Well,  'A'  is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the
 first Alternative  set  while the second alternative set is far
 more complex containing three match strings (added with Alt-Ins)
 of which the third is  a composite string with the '|' (pipe)
 character to create the '(E or F)' condition - if you can make it
 work!

If you really hate to use the '|' operator, or somehow '|' doesn't
work (it always works here, so I use it all the time), you may parse
the same condition to

A or B or (C and D and E) or (C and D and F)

and use four rule sets (1 primary plus 3 alternatives) to do it.

 I  would say that once a filter gets that complex I would tend to make
 two simpler filters that work in sequence to do the whole job.

I agree. It's usually easier to debug that way.

BTW, nice to be back. The past week has been full of horror stories,
one of which involves dealing with the cable company (ATT Cable
Service) and the Internet over cable modem service provider (ISP
Channel). I still haven't got my cable modem service, yet. :( Having
used to ethernet connection for the past two years, dial-up modem
connection is really killing me. Hope I can get my cable modem
connection before the school begin (when the modem pool starts
getting crowded).

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello ztrader,


On  Sunday, August 27, 2000  at  18:38:27 GMT -0700 (which was 6:38 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


 Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex
 conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it
 is implemented in TB, with all the necessary extra characters in just
 the right places. Sometimes a few good examples are worth a lot of
 words and emails :-).

 I'll give it a shot, but the filters don't really convert to plain
 text too well.  So there will still be a few words...

 This might be the best example to show how complex notation goes in
 TB:
z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

 Try the following:

 String Location Presence
 A  Kludges  Yes

 Then click on the Alternative tab and click on Add Set
 In the new set that is added, put the following

 String Location Presence
 B  Kludges  Yes

 Click Add set again, and make the new set read:

 String Location Presence
 C  Kludges  Yes
 D  Kludges  Yes
 E|FKludges  Yes


 And this is good to show how multiple rules are made to interact:
ML A or B or (C and D and E) or (C and D and F)
ML and use four rule sets (1 primary plus 3 alternatives) to do it.

 String Location Presence
 A  Kludges  Yes

 Then click on the Alternative tab and click on Add Set
 In the new set that is added, put the following

 String Location Presence
 B  Kludges  Yes

 Click Add set again, and make the new set read:

 String Location Presence
 C  Kludges  Yes
 D  Kludges  Yes
 E  Kludges  Yes

 Click Add set again, and make the new set read:

 String Location Presence
 C  Kludges  Yes
 D  Kludges  Yes
 F  Kludges  Yes


 I would find these most helpful - and, hey, they might be good to put
 in the help file :-).

 Probably more confusing than what is currently there.
 


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-27 Thread Gerd Ewald

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 27.08.00:

snip

 If you really hate to use the '|' operator, or somehow '|' doesn't
 work (it always works here, so I use it all the time), you may parse
 the same condition to
 

I never got this '|' working properly. I tried everything what is described in the 
HLP-file: no effect ! Could you send me a hardcopy (private e-mail, please) of one of 
your "piped filters" as an example to figure out where the difference is ? 

snip

 BTW, nice to be back. 

Welcome back !

snipped

Cheers
Gerd Ewald
(written @work, no TB! available, sorry !)
___
1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-26 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi ztrader,

On 27 August 2000 at 16:50:50 GMT -0700 (which was 00:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":

z I'm  a  bit  unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An example string
z is:

z [X-SBClass: Blocked | X-SBClass: Spam | X-SBClass: Bulk]

z where one of the above may appear anywhere in the headers. Where do
z I have to put which kind of quotes to get this to work as one of
z the strings:

z X-SBClass: Blocked OR X-SBClass: Spam OR X-SBClass: Bulk

You have a choice of two (similar) ways.

1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass:
Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]' location "Kludges"
presence "Yes".

The single quotes in the signal string are significant.

2)  Set  up  a filter with a main and two alternatives for each of the
signal strings, again for location Kludges.

- - --
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 

 Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


TB! v1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness!

iQA/AwUBOahddjnkJKuSnc2gEQKkGACeMu2jjwZcrTVL2jrmSJwTopNtCiMAoPKD
wrZU3WpCIFdpM6WgL31ZzAkw
=1usS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Spam filter strings?

2000-08-26 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello ztrader,


On  Saturday, August 26, 2000  at  20:27:56 GMT -0700 (which was 8:27 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


 Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the
 string right out of the 'strings' box:

 '[X-SBClass: Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]'

snip example

 The message was not sent to the spam folder, as I had hoped, even
 though it should have a match. Might I need additional parenthesis, or
 is there another reason this is not working? Is the : a special
 character, perhaps?

 I think your filter string is probably to blame here.  I find using
 the pipe symbol for OR is ambiguous.

 Try the following:

 String Location Presence
 X-SBClass: Blocked Kludges  Yes

 Then click on the Alternative tab and click on Add Set
 In the new set that is added, put the following

 String Location Presence
 X-SBClass: SpamKludges  Yes

 Click Add set again, and make the new set read:

 String Location Presence
 X-SBClass: BulkKludges  Yes

 This is the least ambiguous way of getting what you need.


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org