Re: Selective Download Filters

2007-08-02 Thread Doug Higby
Hello Chris,

Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 10:38:39 PM, you wrote:

 Or, perhaps there is a better way to do what I want to do...

 I have one real account [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have two other account [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] and
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neither [EMAIL PROTECTED] nor [EMAIL PROTECTED] have 
 mailboxes that are checkable
 on a server somewhere; both are forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, I 
 don't
 want people to know the the message has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 So,
 I though that I'd create three accounts and use selective download
 filters to ignore the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] messages when 
 checking as
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and select the appropriate messages for the other two
 accounts. At the moment, I have incoming filters for [EMAIL PROTECTED] the 
 move
 the messages to the correct account. However, I have to write my
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] incoming filters in [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Confused yet? I am.

Selective download filter for each account that reads:

Recipient is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The others will be left in the box to be collected by the other
accounts.

I am confused when you say the other accounts aren't checkable.
This would mean you couldn't really send from that address either.

Another way to handle your desire to keep account a hidden is to make
a reply template that checks the recipient address (a, b, or c) and
replies from the appropriate account. Just add %ACCOUNT=a, b, or c
in the reply template.

-- 
 Dougmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
TheBat! Voyager 3.99.4
on Windows XP



Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Selective Download Filters

2007-08-02 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 2 August 2007 at 12:40:09 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Higby wrote:


 Selective download filter for each account that reads:
 
 Recipient is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 The others will be left in the box to be collected by the other
 accounts.

Would this catch cc, bcc, or forwarded messages?

 I am confused when you say the other accounts aren't
 checkable. This would mean you couldn't really send from that
 address either.

Not necessarily. In addition to ISP email addresses, I own two
domain names that I use for email and incoming mail for any
username at either of those domains is all routed to one POP
mailbox.

 Another way to handle your desire to keep account a hidden is to
 make a reply template that checks the recipient address (a, b,
 or c) and replies from the appropriate account. Just add
 %ACCOUNT=a, b, or c in the reply template.

My solution is for one account in TB to download all mail from the
POP mailbox for my two domains. Incoming mail filters direct the
messages to folders in the relevant TB accounts. This means
replies are from the correct account. It also sounds more
efficient to filter the mail just once.


-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

It's better to feed one cat than many mice

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 



Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Selective Download Filters

2007-08-02 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Wednesday 1 August 2007 at 11:38:39 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris W. wrote:

 At the moment, I have incoming filters for [EMAIL PROTECTED] the move the
 messages to the correct account.

That's how I do it.

 However, I have to write my [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] incoming 
 filters
 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Really? I am able to use common filters, rather than putting them
under the wrong account.

Also, I thought that if you filter to an account's inbox the
messages were then checked against that account's incoming mail
filters. Is this incorrect?

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

I would like to help you out. Which way did you come in?

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 



Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Selective Download Filters

2007-08-02 Thread Chris W .

MFPA @ 2007-8-02 3:03:47 PM
Selective Download Filters mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 However, I have to write my [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] incoming 
 filters in
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Also, I thought that if you filter to an account's inbox the
 messages were then checked against that account's incoming mail
 filters. Is this incorrect?

I've committed a grave sin. I only assumed that things will work this
way. I've not tested. When the case arises, I will test and, if I
remember, report back.

-- 
Chris

Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000.
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

Is reading in the bathroom considered multitasking?

pgp1rZEKKs41m.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Selective Download Filters

2007-08-02 Thread Chris W .

Doug Higby @ 2007-8-02 7:40:09 AM
Selective Download Filters mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Selective download filter for each account that reads:
 Recipient is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Except the options are:
* Kill
* Ignore
* Ignore and read

None of these options imply Download this message.

 I am confused when you say the other accounts aren't checkable.
 This would mean you couldn't really send from that address either.

They are real POP or IMAP mailboxes. They just forward to another
account. I use the real account's SMTP server for sending, and that
works just fine.

-- 
Chris

Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000.
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

Sign in a London department store: BARGAIN BASEMENT UPSTAIRS

pgpH71tmponlI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Selective Download Filters

2007-08-01 Thread Chris W .

Is there anyway to use a selective download filter to select only
those messages that I want downloaded. I can only see a way to select
messages NOT to download.

Or, perhaps there is a better way to do what I want to do...

I have one real account [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have two other account [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Neither [EMAIL PROTECTED] nor [EMAIL PROTECTED] have 
mailboxes that are checkable
on a server somewhere; both are forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, I don't
want people to know the the message has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So,
I though that I'd create three accounts and use selective download
filters to ignore the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] messages when 
checking as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and select the appropriate messages for the other two
accounts. At the moment, I have incoming filters for [EMAIL PROTECTED] the move
the messages to the correct account. However, I have to write my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] incoming filters in [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Confused yet? I am.

-- 
Chris

Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000.
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

Today's Oxymoron: Taped live

pgpdd2CrPowEy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Possible bug: selective download filters

2004-02-12 Thread Terry
Hi all,

I have a selective download filter set to Ignore certain messages. I
assumed that meant that the messages would stay on the server until I
used the dispatcher to delete them. This isn't what is happening.

Here's what does seems to be happening (I'm using a test account
and sending messages to that account, so no other mail is
interfering.):

The messages are being filtered correctly. The log indicates the
presence of a message in the mailbox.

 2/12/2004, 11:36:12: FETCH - 1 messages in the mailbox, 0 new
 2/12/2004, 11:36:12: FETCH - connection finished - 0 messages received

On the next check, the log indicates that the message is still there.

 2/12/2004, 11:39:12: FETCH - 1 messages in the mailbox, 0 new

On the third check, the message is gone!

 2/12/2004, 11:42:11: FETCH - 0 messages in the mailbox, 0 new

I've used the mail dispatcher to look at the e-mail in various stages
without automatic checking. On first check, the e-mail is there with
only the read flag checked. On the second dispatcher check, the read
and *delete* flags are checked. *I wouldn't expect that the delete
flag would be checked.* By the third dispatcher check, of course, the
e-mail's been deleted because the flag was checked.

My settings on the account are to Delete received messages from
server. Since these aren't received messages, I wouldn't expect them
to be deleted, whether through automatic checking or through the use
of the dispatcher.

I could, of course, use the Keep messages on server option. The
messages aren't removed, but then no messages are removed. That
defeats the purpose, IMHO, since the account I want to use the filter
on gets a large amount of e-mail daily and I don't want to wade
through all of the e-mail to find the ones that are ignored.

I've read the help files, but there's not much guidance there.  Is
this behavior some kind of bug, or is this by design?

I've also noticed that the results from the Selective Download filters
(whether set to kill or ignore) don't appear in the log. Is this
normal?

-- 
Regards,
Terry


Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-22 Thread Douglas Hinds

Hello Jurgen  other TB! list members following this thread,

On Monday, September 22, 2003 Jurgen responded to my saying the
following:

 I link all accounts to the same text file, which I continue to
 lengthen whenever new Spam mongers are found. This is much easier
 that adding strings to each and every separate account.

JH could you maybe share this file with me? I am going along the
JH same line, and am always interested in catch-phrases :-)

Sure - I assume you want it sent directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I probably have a couple of versions, since I haven't been
transferring the strings added to the desktop computer's text file
to the laptop and vice versa, and I can't recall if I added the
strings that were put in each account's filter manager before
deciding to do a .txt file

But the main thing I wanted to say is that my most important
filtering device is my eyeball, and I can spot extraneous 
unexpected mail rather quickly. One of the major clues is the size
column, sine no virus is going to come in with a size like these
messages have.

For instance: I just manually killed two of Microsoft Patch viruses
on the server, one of which said error message. It's also easy to
notice that the one that said Microsoft didn't in fact come from
Microsoft, as the headers showed. If the headers were correct, a
friend of mine in Guadalajara has an infected computer, so I'll drop
him a note to let him know.

The Spam file contains the usual words like mortgage, loan, viagra,
and sex as well as the domains these things came from, but I can
send it on if you really think it will do you any good.

The beauty of the Mail Dispatcher is the fact that I can review and
rectify all that comes in, so that some things marked for deletion
are downloaded, and some things marked for downloading are deleted.

In general however, the selective download filter and Spam.txt file
save me some time. This is why I hesitate to use a service that
figures out these things for me. I want to use my own judgement in
real time. For instance, I just downloaded one of those things from
Africa asking for help getting X millions of dollars out of the
country, just because it was so ingeniously written. (Obviously, I
have no intention on following through on that though, and I get
lots of these scams that are killed on the server).

-- 

Douglas



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-22 Thread Douglas Hinds

Jurgen, I sent the following to TBUDL twice earlier and yet it
hasn't been posted. I wonder why. Two other posts I sent were
posted, so I'm not being blocked out. Maybe if you redirect it, it
will go through.

Douglas



Hello Jurgen  other TB! list members following this thread,

On Monday, September 22, 2003 Jurgen responded to my saying the
following:

 I link all accounts to the same text file, which I continue to
 lengthen whenever new Spam mongers are found. This is much easier
 that adding strings to each and every separate account.

JH could you maybe share this file with me? I am going along the
JH same line, and am always interested in catch-phrases :-)

Sure - I assume you want it sent directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I probably have a couple of versions, since I haven't been
transferring the strings added to the desktop computer's text file
to the laptop and vice versa, and I can't recall if I added the
strings that were put in each account's filter manager before
deciding to do a .txt file

But the main thing I wanted to say is that my most important
filtering device is my eyeball, and I can spot extraneous 
unexpected mail rather quickly. One of the major clues is the size
column, sine no virus is going to come in with a size like these
messages have.

For instance: I just manually killed two of Microsoft Patch viruses
on the server, one of which said error message. It's also easy to
notice that the one that said Microsoft didn't in fact come from
Microsoft, as the headers showed. If the headers were correct, a
friend of mine in Guadalajara has an infected computer, so I'll drop
him a note to let him know.

The Spam file contains the usual words like mortgage, loan, viagra,
and sex as well as the domains these things came from, but I can
send it on if you really think it will do you any good.

The beauty of the Mail Dispatcher is the fact that I can review and
rectify all that comes in, so that some things marked for deletion
are downloaded, and some things marked for downloading are deleted.

In general however, the selective download filter and Spam.txt file
save me some time. This is why I hesitate to use a service that
figures out these things for me. I want to use my own judgement in
real time. For instance, I just downloaded one of those things from
Africa asking for help getting X millions of dollars out of the
country, just because it was so ingeniously written. (Obviously, I
have no intention on following through on that though, and I get
lots of these scams that are killed on the server).

-- 

Douglas



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread ken green
Rob wrote:
 what did you put in 'Detect by' on the 'Rule' tab ??

 i'm using a text-file with a bunch of subject-lines used by daemons to
 bounce mail, to kill replies to non-existing addresses on my account by
 flagging 'subject' and it works like a charm ...


'Detect by' is set to 'Entire header'

In your text file, are your subject lines formatted in any way (quotes,
brackets, etc.)?  Are they each on a new line?

-- 
 Ken Green
 TheBat! v1.62r, Win2000 SP4



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread ken green
A-ha!!  Saw another thread that mentioned filters not working with IMAP.
I just tested my Spamkill Selective download on my one POP account and
it worked.  I guess that makes - IMAP filters are usually done at the
server, correct?

I guess I need to decide if I should switch all account to POP3 or
continue using IMAP and create a sorting rule that would delete unwanted
messages from the server.

Hmmm  any recommendations?

-- 
 Ken Green
 TheBat! v1.62r, Win2000 SP4



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread Douglas Hinds

Hello ken  other TB! list members following this thread,

On Sunday, September 21, 2003,  you wrote: 

kg I guess I need to decide if I should switch all account to POP3
kg or continue using IMAP and create a sorting rule that would
kg delete unwanted messages from the server.

kg Hmmm  any recommendations?

I  use  POP3 on accounts and selective download exclusively with the
mail  dispatcher,  which  I  set  to  download  25  lines. That way,
Selective  Download will filter on anything contained in that number
of  lines  and  you can review all that's occurring in order to make
any  changes  you  feel are appropriate regarding what will and what
won't be downloaded.

I link all accounts to the same text file, which I continue to
lengthen whenever new Spam mongers are found. This is much easier
that adding strings to each and every separate account.

-- 

Douglas



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello TBUDL,

  After getting about 200 Sven worm type emails a day, I would like to
  know if the selective download filter is case sensitive.

  Is the string this is a string the same as This Is a String as
  far as the filter is concerned?



-- 

Best regards,
 Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   
I'm an incorrigible punster, so don't corrige me! 

http://www.thompsonmike.co.uk/
PGP KeyID := 0xA9547E32

'To see a world in a grain of sand
And heaven in a wild flower
To hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour'

Using TheBat! Version 2.00.6
Running On Windows XP (2600, Service Pack 1)
Sent From OneAndOne


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread Gordon Woolf
Hello Michael,

On Saturday, September 20, 2003, 6:16:54 PM, you wrote:
   After getting about 200 Sven worm type emails a day, I would like to
   know if the selective download filter is case sensitive.
   Is the string this is a string the same as This Is a String as
   far as the filter is concerned?

What strings are you using? There seem to be a huge number of options.

For one brief period they were arriving faster than I could delete
them, but almost all to an address I've hardly ever used -- my mail
address at my broadband ISP, half a world away from my mail host for
my domain name where I've only had (so far) about six. First thing
today there were nearly 400 in my mail at the local ISP and no other
messages at all (not even any other spam!)

However that does make it easy to use message dispatcher.








--
Gordon Woolf
The Worsley Press
Hastings, Victoria, Australia
www.worsleypress.com  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Book: Success in Store - How to Start or Buy a Retail Business,
Enjoy Running It and Make Money



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Gordon,

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, at 18:38:07 [GMT +1000] (which was 09:38 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:




GW Hello Michael,

GW On Saturday, September 20, 2003, 6:16:54 PM, you wrote:
   After getting about 200 Sven worm type emails a day, I would like to
   know if the selective download filter is case sensitive.
   Is the string this is a string the same as This Is a String as
   far as the filter is concerned?

GW What strings are you using? There seem to be a huge number of options.

GW For one brief period they were arriving faster than I could delete
GW them, but almost all to an address I've hardly ever used -- my mail
GW address at my broadband ISP, half a world away from my mail host for
GW my domain name where I've only had (so far) about six. First thing
GW today there were nearly 400 in my mail at the local ISP and no other
GW messages at all (not even any other spam!)

GW However that does make it easy to use message dispatcher.


Just going through the long list of actual messages and creating a
list. They dont appear random, but they do share a set of names that
are more prevelent than others.

-- 
Best regards,
 Michael

http://www.thompsonmike.co.uk/
PGP KeyID := 0xA9547E32
  

If marriage were outlawed, only outlaws would have in-laws.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread ken green
Michael Thompson wrote:
   Is the string this is a string the same as This Is a String as
   far as the filter is concerned?

Not sure about Selective download (see my troubles below), but in
general, any kind of filtering is usually case-sensitive - especially if
enclosed in quotes.  (and regex is case-sensitive)

I can't get Selective download to work.  I would greatly appreciate
anyone's help on this.  I'm starting to wonder if a 'regular' filter
that deleted items off the server would be a better option for me.

I have a list of e-mail addresses and domains that I'd like to Kill
(never download, delete from the server). In the Selective Download
folder of Sorting Office, I created a filter rule called SpamKill.

I have tried entering the list of addresses in the signal strings box,
as well as using a text file and checking 'load signal strings from a
file' - in both cases, each address/domain was listed on a new line, and
the Advanced tab options were: Action: Kill and Detection method: Any
strings match.

But I can't get this to work. According the help system, Selective
download signal strings do not allow the special syntax used by other
types of filters.

How are people getting Selective Download to work? Does each string need
to be in quotes or something? Should the signal strings be
comma-delimited? I feel like I'm missing something terribly obvious.

-- 
 Ken Green
 TheBat! v1.62r, Win2000 SP4



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Getting signal strings in a file to work in Selective Download filters

2001-11-03 Thread Tim Magee

Dear TBUDL,

  I'm trying to get a selective download rule to work with signal
  strings loaded from a file.  The rule looks like:

  Rule tab:
Name = Approved senders
Detect by = Originator
Signal strings = (empty)
Rule is:
  Active = checked
  Manual only = unchecked
  Advanced tab:
Action = Kill
Detection method = None of strings should match
Load signal strings from the file = checked
filename box names an existing file (selected by browsing)


  The signal strings file is formatted like:

 v--column 1
 string1
 string2
 ...
 etc

  When I used to put all the strings in the signal strings box on the
  Rule tab, the rule would mark for retrieval only messages from
  people matching entries the list.

  Will someone put me out of my misery and tell me what I did wrong?
  The help's a little sketchy on what should go in the signal strings
  file.

-- 
Warmest human regards,
Tim Magee  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98
4.10 Build 
 A 


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com