RE: Tomcat 3.3 log rotation in Windows 2000

2002-09-05 Thread Larry Isaacs

I don't think Tomcat outputs much to stdout directly.
Is there particular output you are looking capture
that isn't being written to the tc_log?

If not, you could assing the tc_log to a file?  In the
absence of a path on the LogSetter, I think the output
goes to stderr.

The syntax applies to logging done by Tomcat's internal
logger classes.  It wouldn't apply to stdout being
sent directly to a file.  

Cheers,
Larry
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Jack Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:45 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 log rotation in Windows 2000
 
 
 Larry:
 
 Thanks so much for the response -- this has been a vexing 
 problem for us.
 
 Our problem is with the stdout.log which we set on the 
 command line when
 starting Tomcat (eg, -out F:\TomcatLogs\stdout.log). Perhaps 
 this is a JVM
 issue that can't be address directly with Tomcat (??). The servlet and
 jasper logs that are set in server.xml rotate just fine.
 
 I am assuming (perhaps incorrectly) that the syntax you 
 suggested for the
 server.xml file will not work on the command line.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 JL
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:48 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 log rotation in Windows 2000
 
 You can include a java.text.SimpleDateFormat string enclosed
 within ${} in the path specification of LogSetter in
 the server.xml.  For example, the LogSetter for the
 servlet_log in the default server.xml uses:
 
   path=logs/servlet-${MMdd}.log
 
 This causes a new log to be started each day.  Note that
 Tomcat 3.3.1 and earlier still write/rewrite a new file when
 Tomcat is restarted.  The Tomcat 3.3.x nightly has been updated
 to append.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jack Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 7:47 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Tomcat 3.3 log rotation in Windows 2000
  
  
  Anyone know a good way to rotate Tomcat logs (e.g., 
  stdout.log) in Windows
  without stopping Tomcat?  We capture lots of logging info 
 and the file
  builds quickly, but we want to avoid the loss of user 
  sessions that comes
  with stopping Tomcat to clear/delete the log file.  While 
  Tomcat is running,
  Windows will not let it be delete because the file is in use.
  
   
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
   
  
  Jack L
  
  
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Help me, please~~~

2002-08-29 Thread Larry Isaacs

To manually specify user contexts, see the information
found at:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.html#context_addcust

To do something automatically you would need to write your
own version of org.apache.tomcat.modules.config.AutoWebApp.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Rouby Maddux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:52 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Help me, please~~~
 
 
 I use tomcat3.3.1 + apache1.3.26 + Debian3.0.
 
 I want to let general user can develop their homepages in 
 [userhome]/www.
 i.e. IF I type http://localhost/~marcus/ in my browser, it 
 must display my 
 homepage right there.
 
 What should I do???
 
 --
 Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, e-mail: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Modifying Tomcat to have WEB-INF/config in Classpath

2002-08-27 Thread Larry Isaacs

Hi,

Since there is a thread for this here on tomcat-user, I'm
replying here instead of tomcat-dev.

I think you would save yourself a lot of trouble if
you settled for putting db.properties in WEB-INF/classes/config
and used:

java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle(config.db).getString(schema)

if you really don't want to use WEB-INF/classes directly.  This
code would still work if you someday upgraded to Tomcat4 or beyond.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:48 AM
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: Modifying Tomcat to have WEB-INF/config in Classpath
 
 
 Because i read the properties in a interface like this :
 
 package com.a2a.util ;
 public interface A2aConstantes
 {
   public static final String SCHEMA =
   java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle(db).getString(schema);
 }
 
 I don't think i can read the property file as u do because
 i can't do a getResourceAsStream()
 
  -Message d'origine-
  De : Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Envoyé : mardi 27 août 2002 15:00
  À : Tomcat Developers List
  Objet : RE: Modifying Tomcat to have WEB-INF/config in Classpath
  
  
  It is not clear why adding WEB-INF/config to the webapp
  classpath is necessary or why you would even want to.
  If you are simply trying to read a properties file:
  
  %
  java.util.Properties props = new java.util.Properties();
  props.load(application.getResourceAsStream(
  /WEB-INF/config/myprops.properties));
  out.println(props);
  %
  
  works for me as a JSP test case.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:29 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Modifying Tomcat to have WEB-INF/config in Classpath
   
   
   Hi,
   
   I want Tomcat 3.3.1 to have WEB-INF/config in the classpath( 
   like WEB-INF/classes ).
   
   I have modified the LoaderInteceptor11.java :
   In the method addContext, i have added :
   
 // Add WEB-INF/config
 File d = new File(base + /WEB-INF/config);
 if( d.exists() ) {
 try {
 URL url=new URL( file, null,
 d.getAbsolutePath().replace('\\','/') + / );
 context.addClassPath( url );
 } catch( MalformedURLException ex ) {
 }
   }
   
   
   I have recompiled Tomcat but it doesnot work.
   My properties in WEB-INF/config are still not found.
   
   Can anybody help me ?
   Michenaud Laurent
   - Adeuza -
   [ Développeur Web - Administrateur Réseau ]
   
   
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
   mailto:tomcat-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For 
   additional commands, 
   e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3 does not find jndi.properties

2002-08-20 Thread Larry Isaacs

I'm glad Tomcat 3.3.1 worked, per the other e-mail.

In my day job, I have some deadlines coming up and a bunch
of code to write.  Unless someone else volunteers to be
release manager, a 3.3.2 release is probably a month or
two away.  There just isn't enough spare time to do much
at the moment.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Olaf Jahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 6:40 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 does not find jndi.properties
 
 
 Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  If possible, give Tomcat 3.3.2-dev from:
  
  http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/nightly-3.3.x/
  
  a try to see if the fix for Bugzilla #7654 corrects this problem.
 
 Thanks a lot, the problem does not exist any more with the lastest
 3.3.2-dev. The jndi.properties file placed in WEB-INF/classes is now
 found and read.
 
 When is a release of 3.3.2 to be expected?
 
 Regards
   Olaf
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3 does not find jndi.properties

2002-08-19 Thread Larry Isaacs

If possible, give Tomcat 3.3.2-dev from:

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/nightly-3.3.x/

a try to see if the fix for Bugzilla #7654 corrects this problem.

See: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7654

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Olaf Jahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:42 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3 does not find jndi.properties
 
 
 Hi,
 
 my Tomcat 3.3a does not find the jndi.properties file regardless of
 where I put it inside the web application tree.  That is, I tried the
 web app root as well as WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes.
 
 Only if I place it directly into jre/lib the file is found, which of
 course is not really an option for a modular application.
 
 Does anyone know any help or maybe a workaround?
 
 A little research yielded only that this symptom was encoutered with
 Tomcat 3.2.x, being a bug in the AdaptiveClassLoader -- which does not
 seem to exist any more as of Tomcat 3.3 it seems.
 
 Olaf
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-08-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

It would seem that the JSPs are being handled as static files
and not being handled by the JspInterceptor.  I would recommend
doublechecking how you have configured your Tomcat and use log
output (set non-zero debug levels as needed) to see why it is
behaving the way it is.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:44 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1
 
 
 Hi
 
 I am using Embedded tomcat 3.3.1. When i query for a JSP page it
 does not execute it but it displays the jsp file as the same 
 file.  Help
 me !!!
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Vijay
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: upgrading from v.3.1.1 to v.3.3 ?

2002-08-12 Thread Larry Isaacs

I would start with:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/readme

which documents changes to Tomcat 3.3 from Tomcat 3.2.x.
Install a complete copy of Tomcat 3.3.1 and either
copy your web applications over, or refer to:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.html#context_addcust

on how to serve your 3.1.1 webapps without copying them.
As long as your webapps are not dependent on bugs or quirks
in Tomcat 3.1.1, it shouldn't be a lot of work getting them
to run successfully in Tomcat 3.3.1.

HTH

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Tomsic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 7:23 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: upgrading from v.3.1.1 to v.3.3 ?
 
 
 What's involved w/ an upgrade of Tomcat from 3.1.1
 to 3.3?
 
 Is this a fairly straight forward task, or is it quite
 involved?
 We're experiencing some odd behaviour from 3.1.1,
 and can't help but wonder if it's got something to do
 w/ the old version.
 
 Unfortunately, we're in the middle of a crunch
 deadline, so if it's as simple as say, swapping out a
 jar file or something, that would be great.
 
 Thoughts, or can someone point me to a FAQ on
 upgrading like this?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Paul Tomsic
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
 http://www.hotjobs.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Classpath Woes...

2002-07-31 Thread Larry Isaacs

Ben,

Does the /examples webapp works fine and only your
webapp is exibiting this behavior?  If so, does your
web.xml re-map *.jsp to the JspServlet?

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Boule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:11 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Classpath Woes...
 
 
 Tomcat 3.3.1, downloaded as a binary, installed in a new directory on
 Solaris 8.
 
 No changes were made to the Tomcat configuration, other than 
 things like
 turning on debug flags in server.xml, etc...
 
 Ben
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:56 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Classpath Woes...
 
 
 Which Tomcat 3.3.x, and was it installed in a new directory
 (which is recommended)?  Any changes to the default configuration?
 The default configuration of Tomcat 3.3.x doesn't use the
 JspServlet.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ben Boule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:06 PM
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  Subject: Classpath Woes...
  
  
  Hi, 
  I was wondering if anyone could help me out with a problem 
 with Tomcat
  3.3.x.
  
  We've developed our application under the Tomcat 3.2.x 
  implementation that
  is integrated into JBuilder 6.  We use Struts for our 
 framework.  The
  application works
  fine in that environment.  I am now trying to set up the 
  deployment, and we
  wanted to 
  use either Tomcat 3.3.x or Tomcat 4.0.x.Tomcat 4 seems to 
  have issues
  with our 
  ORB implementation (Borland) so for now I am working with 3.3.x.
  
  The problem is that when the application goes to compile a 
  .jsp file for the
  first time, 
  it encounters a ClassNotFoundException trying to find a 
 Jasper class,
  JspServlet.
  
  e.x.  (from the std output)
  
  2002-07-30 17:58:30 - Ctx(/app name) : Class not found:
  org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
  
  If I copy the jasper.jar file from $TOMCAT_HOME/lib/container 
  into app
  name/WEB-INF/lib, then the Jasper classes are not found.
  
  However, this results in another class not found exception, 
  this time it
  can't find the classes for the javac compiler!   
 (sun.tools.something)
  
  If I then copy the tools.jar file from the JDK 1.3 
  distribution into the
  WEB-INF/lib directory, everything works.  This would 
  obviously seem to be an
  unacceptable solution however.
  
  I can't figure out why this is happening.  It doesn't 
 happen with the
  example applications under the exact same environment.
  
  (JAVA_HOME is set to point to JDK 1.3.1, TOMCAT_HOME is set 
  to the right
  directory as well.)
  
  I have read the classloader-howto several times but I can't 
 figure out
  what's wrong.
  
  Thanks,
  Ben Boule
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands, 
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Classpath Woes...

2002-07-30 Thread Larry Isaacs

Which Tomcat 3.3.x, and was it installed in a new directory
(which is recommended)?  Any changes to the default configuration?
The default configuration of Tomcat 3.3.x doesn't use the
JspServlet.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Boule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:06 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Classpath Woes...
 
 
 Hi, 
 I was wondering if anyone could help me out with a problem with Tomcat
 3.3.x.
 
 We've developed our application under the Tomcat 3.2.x 
 implementation that
 is integrated into JBuilder 6.  We use Struts for our framework.  The
 application works
 fine in that environment.  I am now trying to set up the 
 deployment, and we
 wanted to 
 use either Tomcat 3.3.x or Tomcat 4.0.x.Tomcat 4 seems to 
 have issues
 with our 
 ORB implementation (Borland) so for now I am working with 3.3.x.
 
 The problem is that when the application goes to compile a 
 .jsp file for the
 first time, 
 it encounters a ClassNotFoundException trying to find a Jasper class,
 JspServlet.
 
 e.x.  (from the std output)
 
 2002-07-30 17:58:30 - Ctx(/app name) : Class not found:
 org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
 
 If I copy the jasper.jar file from $TOMCAT_HOME/lib/container 
 into app
 name/WEB-INF/lib, then the Jasper classes are not found.
 
 However, this results in another class not found exception, 
 this time it
 can't find the classes for the javac compiler!   (sun.tools.something)
 
 If I then copy the tools.jar file from the JDK 1.3 
 distribution into the
 WEB-INF/lib directory, everything works.  This would 
 obviously seem to be an
 unacceptable solution however.
 
 I can't figure out why this is happening.  It doesn't happen with the
 example applications under the exact same environment.
 
 (JAVA_HOME is set to point to JDK 1.3.1, TOMCAT_HOME is set 
 to the right
 directory as well.)
 
 I have read the classloader-howto several times but I can't figure out
 what's wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Ben Boule
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: disabling cookies, Tomcat 3.3.1 Final

2002-07-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

What you are looking for isn't directly supported in Tomcat 3.3.1.
Are you able permitted to use customized version of Tomcat 3.3.1?
If not, you could try setting noCookies=true on the global
SessionId and setting noCookies=false on the local SessionId
for Contexts you want to use cookies.  It looks like the
cookiesFirst setting on the global SessionId will apply to all.

If you can use a customized (i.e. replace SessionId with
your modified version) Tomcat 3.3.1, then a better solution
should be possible.  Let me know if you want to try this
path.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Christian Kurze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:21 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: disabling cookies, Tomcat 3.3.1 Final
 
 
 HI,
 
 I want to use URL rewriting for session tracking by default, 
 that means,
 even if the user has activated cookies in his/her browser, 
 the url should be
 encoded via response.encodeURL(). There is a module SessionId
 cookiesFirst=false noCookies=true / to use in the 
 server.xml. But I
 don't know where to place it, because I want to deactivate 
 cookies in only
 one context. The others should use cookies by default. I tried the
 following, but it didn't work for me:
 Context path=/onlinestore
   docBase=D:\Java\onlinestore\defaultroot
   crossContext=true
   workdir=D:\Java\onlinestore\defaultroot
   debug=0
   reloadable=true
   SessionId cookiesFirst=false noCookies=true /
 /Context
 In 4.0 there is an attribute for Context, cookies=false, 
 but I HAVE TO
 work with 3.3.1 final.
 Is it possible to deactivate cookies in the web.xml file?
 
 Any help appreciated.
 Thanks
 
 Christian
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: disabling cookies, Tomcat 3.3.1 Final

2002-07-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

It may be that the local SessionId executes too early in
the chain to have the desired effect.

A feature of the Context element is that any attribute that
doesn't have an explicit setter get stored in a properties
hashtable in the Context.  Thus, you could add noCookies=true
to the Context, i.e.

Context ... noCookies=true ...

and a noCookies property would be set on that Context.
I believe you could create a MySessionId interceptor that
extends SessionId.  It would override the beforeBody() method
and would check the noCookie property on the context.  If
found and is true, then skip calling super.beforeBody(...)
so the normal handling is skipped and the cookie isn't added.
Let me know if a modification like this would be acceptable.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Christian Kurze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:53 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: disabling cookies, Tomcat 3.3.1 Final
 
 
 THanks, but it doesn't work. I set SessionId cookiesFirst=false
 noCookies=true / in the ContextManager. But the browsers 
 still use
 cookies. I tried to put SessionId in the server-section, without
 success.
 I'm not allowed to modify the whole server.xml. But I can modify my
 context-section. Please tell me about your other solution, 
 maybe I can
 persuade the admins to change the whole server.xml.
 
 thx in advance
 Christian
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:27 PM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: disabling cookies, Tomcat 3.3.1 Final
 
 
  What you are looking for isn't directly supported in Tomcat 3.3.1.
  Are you able permitted to use customized version of Tomcat 3.3.1?
  If not, you could try setting noCookies=true on the global
  SessionId and setting noCookies=false on the local SessionId
  for Contexts you want to use cookies.  It looks like the
  cookiesFirst setting on the global SessionId will apply to all.
 
  If you can use a customized (i.e. replace SessionId with
  your modified version) Tomcat 3.3.1, then a better solution
  should be possible.  Let me know if you want to try this
  path.
 
  Cheers,
  Larry
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Christian Kurze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:21 AM
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: disabling cookies, Tomcat 3.3.1 Final
  
  
   HI,
  
   I want to use URL rewriting for session tracking by default,
   that means,
   even if the user has activated cookies in his/her browser,
   the url should be
   encoded via response.encodeURL(). There is a module SessionId
   cookiesFirst=false noCookies=true / to use in the
   server.xml. But I
   don't know where to place it, because I want to deactivate
   cookies in only
   one context. The others should use cookies by default. I tried the
   following, but it didn't work for me:
   Context path=/onlinestore
 docBase=D:\Java\onlinestore\defaultroot
 crossContext=true
 workdir=D:\Java\onlinestore\defaultroot
 debug=0
 reloadable=true
 SessionId cookiesFirst=false noCookies=true /
   /Context
   In 4.0 there is an attribute for Context, cookies=false,
   but I HAVE TO
   work with 3.3.1 final.
   Is it possible to deactivate cookies in the web.xml file?
  
   Any help appreciated.
   Thanks
  
   Christian
  
  
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
   mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For
   additional commands,
   e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and Tag Lib

2002-07-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

As a Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 reference implementation, by
design, it would not be able to handle a 1.2 tag library.
You will need to still with 1.1.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1 and Tag Lib
 
 
 I would like to know whether i can use JSP Tag Library 1.2
 with JSP 1.1 and so with Tomcat 3.3.1 ? Or should i use
 JSP Tag Library 1.1 instead ?
 
 Thanks
 
 Michenaud Laurent
 - Adeuza -
 [ Développeur Web - Administrateur Réseau ]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: What can cause a clean Tomcat shutdown?

2002-07-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

I am not aware of any way to have a spontaneous clean shutdown in
Tomcat 3.3.1 (besides sending a shutdown message like shutdown.sh
does).

If feasible, I would recommend compiling a custom version of
Tomcat 3.3.1, with extra logging added to help detect the cause.
I would start with ContextManager.shutdown().  Add some logging
(there doesn't appear to be helpful logging there by default),
and print a stack trace.  Then see where the logs lead you, adding
more logging as needed.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:51 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: What can cause a clean Tomcat shutdown?
 
 
 Guys, I'm asking this question again in hope someone notices 
 this time:
 
 Except for the stop command sent to the Ajp12 connector, is 
 there another
 event that will cause a Tomcat 3.3.1 to shut down cleanly?
 
 We experience sporadic spontaneous clean shutdowns of 
 Tomcat 3.3.1 and
 have no idea what causes them. We know these are normal 
 shutdowns since the
 servlet log shows the contexts are being unloaded and 
 servlets' destroy()
 methods are being called - just as if someone has issued a 
 tomcat.sh stop
 (before you ask: nobody does).
 
 Any clues appreciated.
 Cheers,
   Attila.
 
 --
 Attila Szegedi
 home: http://www.szegedi.org
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: getRemoteUser in Tomcat 3.3.1 does not work

2002-07-12 Thread Larry Isaacs

To use Apache's authentication, you must update the
Ajp13Connector to set tomcatAuthentication false in
your server.xml (it defaults true), i.e.:

Ajp13Connector port=8009 tomcatAuthentication=false /

There is a little bit of documentation concerning this
in the server.xml, above the Ajp13Connector element.  You can
find a little more documentation here:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.html#Ajp13Connector

Once tomcatAuthentication is set false, any security constraints in
web.xml files will no longer work.  This probably won't impact
your web applications, but the security examples will stop
functioning.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Andreas Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 5:43 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: getRemoteUser in Tomcat 3.3.1 does not work
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I am trying to get the remote user under tomcat 3.3.1 and 
 apache 1.3.12 on NT4 and Win2k.
 The authentification is done by apache and the ntlm module.
 
 If I try getRemoteUser() I only get a null value.
 I tryed NTLM and BASIC authentification - nothing works.
 I tryed various mod_jk.dll Versions - nothing helps.
 I tryed Tomcat 3.2.3 - everything works fine.
 
 Whats the problem with tomcat 3.3.1? Is this a bug or 
 bevavior by design?
 
 cu
 Andreas
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Decode Interceptor: charset from session. How to get rid of it in tomcat 3.3

2002-07-12 Thread Larry Isaacs


DecodeInterceptor debug=-1 /

worked for me.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 7:14 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Decode Interceptor: charset from session. How to get 
 rid of it in tomcat 3.3
 
 
 As you can read in the subect, this trace or whatever, is 
 appearing in the 
 console on everyr request made to tomcat(v3.3, novell6,jdk1.3.0.1).
 I've tried everything with the decodeinterceptor entry (ie: 
 debug -1 or 0) 
 in server.xml, but it is still there. I´ve readt it's fixed 
 in Tomcat 3.3.1, 
 but what with 3.3?
 By the way, if the only solution is going for the upgrade, 
 which is the
 latest version of tomcat available for novell 6?
 Thanks in advance.
 Anxiously waiting for your answers,
 Antonio.
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
 http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log PUT requests

2002-07-02 Thread Larry Isaacs

AcessLogInterceptor writes the log entry using the
beforeCommit() hook.  If no response is generated by
the request, then it appears that no log entry would be
created.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:10 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log PUT requests
 
 
 We are running Tomcat 3.3.1 in standalone mode (no Apache etc) 
 and log requestes to AccessLog with AccessLogInterceptor.
 Unless we misconfigured something it seems like PUT 
 requests only show up in the log if they produced an error
 (404, 500).  Is this a configuration problem or is there
 something wrong with AccessLogInterceptor?
 
 Thnaks,
 Michael
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: getting isapi_redirect.dll to work with tomcat 4.0 and IIS

2002-07-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

See if:

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg55430.html

helps.  This issue isn't related to the choice of
isapi_redirect.dll or isapi_redirector.dll.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: mallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:05 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: getting isapi_redirect.dll to work with tomcat 
 4.0 and IIS
 
 
 Well... I've tried both those solutions; same error, except 
 that now the
 error code after the 404 is 660 instead of 654.  Any more 
 thoughts about
 how this double indirection could be happening?
 
 Thanks,
 Michael
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andrew Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:17 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'; Michael Allen
 Subject: RE: getting isapi_redirect.dll to work with tomcat 
 4.0 and IIS
 
 Hey Michael,
  
 Your problem is very interesting.  It seems your redirector is getting
 you to the Tomcat server (your getting a tomcat error) then 
 looking for
 the redirector again.  
  
 the file isapi_redirect.dll is from Tomcat 3.3 I believe.  
 While all the
 documentation says it will work, I had the smoothest 
 installation using
 this redirector
  
  
 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4
 .0.3/bin/w
 in32/
  
 the file name is isapi_redirector.dll and you will need to 
 make sure you
 modify all your registry settings to reflect this.  renaming 
 the file to
 isapi_redirect.dll may cause problems because I think it looks
 internally for itself.
  
  
 then, start check that your virtual directory jakarta 
 pointing to the
 folder containing isapi_redirector.dll
  
 if neither of those solutions work, you might want to start over using
 this step-by-step install guide.
  
 http://www.getnet.net/~rbarr/TomcatOnIIS/default.htm
  
  
 -Andrew
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:58 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: getting isapi_redirect.dll to work with tomcat 4.0 and IIS
 
 
 Hello!
  
 I think I have been through all the FAQs available, and I 
 feel like I am
 close to getting this to work.  I have set up the /jakarta/ 
 as a virtual
 folder, I have edited the registry, I get a green arrow under ISAPI
 filters. but when I try to go to, for example,
 http://localhost/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp, I get the 
 following in my
 browser:
 
 Apache Tomcat/4.0.3 - HTTP Status 404 - /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll
 
 
   _  
 
 type Status report
 message /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll
 description The requested resource 
 (/jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll) is not
 available.
  
 And in my log file I get:
 002:10:59:06 -0600] GET /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll? 
 HTTP/1.1 404 654
  
 on the other hand, if I try:
 http://localhost:8080/examples/dates/dates.jsp; everything is happy.
  
 Am I close?  Help.
  
 Michael
  
 
 Michael E. Allen, Ph.D. (847)965-2932
 Senior Research Scientist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Compuational Research Group
 Integrated DNA Technologies
 Suite 700
 8930 Gross Point Rd.
 Skokie, IL 60077
  
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Two Tomcat 3.3.1 issues; SSL and Coyote

2002-06-25 Thread Larry Isaacs

Unfortunately, the build process I used to create the
the 3.3.1 distribution binaries didn't include the PureTLS
support.  You will need to rebuild Tomcat 3.3.1 from
source to pickup the PureTLS support.

PureTLS support is now included in the Tomcat 3.3.x build
process, so you might try 3.3.x first see if you can
get it working.

I'll see about getting the Coyote release notes updated to say
CoyoteInterceptor2.  Thanks.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Sam Ewing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:56 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Two Tomcat 3.3.1 issues; SSL and Coyote
 
 
 I had a couple of problems with Tomcat 3.3.1. Any help
 appreciated!!
 
 1. I was trying to use PureTLS with the standand
 HTTP/1.0 Tomcat connector.
I copied over the three jar file
 - cryptix32.jar, cryptix-asn1.jar and puretls.jar into
 %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext
I get the exception-
 org.apache.tomcat.core.TomcatException: Error loading
 SSLImplementation
I copies the jsse jar files here and SSL works
 fine...
 
 2. Next, I tried the Coyote connector, and following
 the instructions given at
 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coy
ote/release/v1.0-rc2/
to a 'T'.

  Result: I found that 

module name=CoyoteConnector
javaClass=org.apache.coyote.tomcat3.CoyoteInterceptor/

 needs to be

module name=CoyoteConnector
javaClass=org.apache.coyote.tomcat3.CoyoteInterceptor2/

(note the '2').

  I make the change, and Tomcat starts up fine-
however, the browser cant access http://localhost:8081
(the port I configured this connector at). No errors
too.. Help!!

Tx


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: how to deny access for certain IP addresses?

2002-06-18 Thread Larry Isaacs

Tomcat 3.3.x uses modules/interceptors instead of valves.
A single class can participate in many aspects of server
operation.

Your class would extend BaseInterceptor and implement one
or more methods to achieve the desired behavior.  The
postReadRequest might be a reasonable one to use.  A non-zero
return value triggers the status handler, which assumes the
value is the error status.  Returning 403 would cause a
a forbidden error.

Some digging into the sources would be needed, but hopefully
not to much.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:39 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: how to deny access for certain IP 
 addresses?
 
 
 Thanks to ravi and Ralph for their fast replies.  From that it
 looks like what I want can't easily be done.  I need it as a
 protection against misconfiguration on the client side within
 the intranet.  So firewall is out.  It is a third party software 
 so modifying the code is out.  And porting the valve from 
 Tomcat 4.0 is beyond my non-existing Java skills.  I was hoping
 for something simple like the valve but for TC 3.3.1.
 
 Thanks anyway,
 Michael
 
  -Original Message-
  From:   ravi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Monday, June 17, 2002 2:03 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject:Re: Tomcat 3.3.1: how to deny access for certain IP
  addresses?
  
  hi mike,
  
  one way of handling it is thro ur appln itself by using
  
  request.getRemoteAddr() which returns the IP address of the client
  requesting ur servlet
  
  this can then be compared/patternmatched against a databse 
 or any other
  storage unit...
  
  regs,
  ravi
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 4:44 PM
  Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1: how to deny access for certain IP addresses?
  
  
   The subject pretty much says it.  We run Tomcat 3.3.1 as 
 a webserver
   (no Apache or anything) and would like to deny access from certain
   IP addresses.  More precisely, for a certain servlet.  Can this be
   done and if yes, how?
  
   Thanks,
   Michael
  
--
Michael Lemke  --  Information Services Communication 
 (IZ/HZA-IC1)
INA-Schaeffler KG,   Tel: +49 (0)9132 - 82 3441
Industriestr 1-3,e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-91074 Herzogenaurach   http://www.ina.com
   
  
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat Unexplained Shutdown

2002-06-11 Thread Larry Isaacs

Have you verified that the System.exit()s in IfaxSend.java.
are not being executed?  If executed, they would to a fine job
of taking down Tomcat.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Geoff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:13 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat Unexplained Shutdown
 
 
 Here are the uncompiled servlets (the ones that would 
 possibly cause the shutdowns) - if you need the associated 
 jar file let me know...
 
 thanks!
 
 Geoff
 
 -Original Message-
 From: FEDERICO MARTIN LARA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat Unexplained Shutdown
 
 
 Great!
 
 Have you got the sevlets?.
 
 -Mensaje original-
 De: Geoff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Enviado el: martes, 11 de junio de 2002 13:34
 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Asunto: Tomcat Unexplained Shutdown
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Geoff Peters
 Sent: June 7, 2002 11:12 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Tomcat Unexplained Shutdown
 
 
 I am running Tomcat 4.0.2 on Windows NT 4.0, it is running a web based
 faxing application that users can attach a document to send 
 to a server
 process that sends it as an attachment. This is done using 
 servlets. Every
 so often, if a user uploads an attachment the server doesn't 
 like, it shuts
 down Tomcat, other times it seems if the user tries to view a 
 file on the
 server that doesn't exist, the Tomcat server shuts itself 
 down. This is very
 annoying, and the customer is not impressed - is there is a 
 way to simply
 throw an exception and continue running, instead of Tomcat 
 shutting itself
 down? I can't really be more specific as there are no errors 
 in the log
 files to correspond to these occurrences, all I know is that 
 it happens and
 makes the app look WAY less stable than if it was built using 
 ASP's and
 running under IIS..
 
 Any suggestions?
 
 Geoff
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, e-mail: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias

2002-06-10 Thread Larry Isaacs

Check the mod_jk log and make sure the www.test.net requests
are being forwarded to Tomcat.  If so, set the debug level
on SimpleMapper1 in server.xml to 1 and examine the
Tomcat log to see how the www.test.net requests are being
handled differently from www.test.com requests.  I currently
don't see anything in your config files that would cause this
not to work.

Note that the debug attributes should be set a numeric value
rather than info.  I would guess this would be equivalent
to setting it to zero.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:27 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I've Tomcat 3.3.1 and Apache running together with mod_jk.
 
 I'm trying to setup alias for VirtualHost in the tomcat configuration
 but it doesnot work.
 
 * Here what i have in httpd.conf :
 
 NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.125:80
 
 VirtualHost 192.168.1.125:80
 DocumentRoot c:/adeuza/sites/fortunoclic
 ServerName www.test.fr
 ErrorLog c:\tmp\apache-error-testfr.log
 CustomLog c:\tmp\apache-access-testfr.log common
 /VirtualHost
 
 VirtualHost 192.168.1.125:80
 DocumentRoot c:/adeuza/sites/test
 ServerName www.test.com
 ServerAlias www.test.net
 ErrorLog c:\tmp\apache-error-testcom.log
 CustomLog c:\tmp\apache-error-testcom.log common
 /VirtualHost
 
 * And my apps-testfr.xml 
 
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
 webapps
   Host name=www.test.fr address=192.168.1.125:80
 Context path=/ 
  docBase=c:/adeuza/sites/fortunoclic 
  debug=info 
 /Context  
   /Host
 /webapps
 
 * And my apps-testcom.xml
 
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
 webapps
   Host name=www.test.com address=192.168.1.125:80
 alias name=www.test.net /
 Context path=/ 
  docBase=c:/adeuza/sites/test 
  debug=info 
 /Context
   /Host
 /webapps
 
 
www.test.fr and www.test.com are ok.
www.test.net can display the correct html files but it cannot find the
jsp and servlet



Michenaud Laurent
- Adeuza -
[ Développeur Web - Administrateur Réseau ]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias

2002-06-10 Thread Larry Isaacs

It looks like the only way for things not to be working
is if the www.test.net isn't being added as a host alias
on the Tomcat side.  Try Alias .../ with a capital 'A',
i.e:

Alias name=www.test.net / 

I believe this will get it working.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:06 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
 
 
 Requesting www.test.net/index.jsp logs :
 
 * In mod_jk.log :
 
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (351)]: Into
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (368)]: Attempting to
 map URI '/index.jsp'
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (416)]:
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match ajp13 -
 *.jsp
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_worker.c (123)]: Into
 wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_worker.c (127)]: 
 wc_get_worker_for_name,
 done  found a worker
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (865)]: Into
 jk_worker_t::get_endpoint
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (775)]: Into
 jk_endpoint_t::service
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (403)]: Into
 ajp13_marshal_into_msgb
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (537)]: 
 ajp13_marshal_into_msgb
 - Done
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (206)]: 
 sending to ajp13
 #334
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (645)]: send_request 2:
 request body to send 0 - request body to resend 0
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: received from
 ajp13 #47
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (584)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: status = 404
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (591)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: Number of headers is = 2
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (634)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: Header[0] [Content-Type] = [text/html]
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (634)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: Header[1] [Content-Length] = [171]
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: received from
 ajp13 #175
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: received from
 ajp13 #2
 [Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (549)]: Into
 jk_endpoint_t::done
 
 * In tc.log
 
 After tomcat load : ( there is no www.test.net, normal ? )
 2002-06-10 19:00:25 - ContextManager: Tomcat configured and in stable
 state 
 2002-06-10 19:00:25 - ContextManager: Adding  www.test.fr:/ROOT
 2002-06-10 19:00:25 - ContextManager: Adding  www.test.com:/ROOT
 
 When i call www.test.net/index.jsp :
 2002-06-10 19:00:53 - ContextManager: Host = www.test.net
 2002-06-10 19:00:53 - ContextManager: Assertion failed: 
 container==null
 (no Default Context?)
 2002-06-10 19:00:53 - Ctx() : Status code:404 request:R( /index.jsp)
 msg:null
 
 
 Any ideas ?
 
 
  -Message d'origine-
  De : Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Envoyé : lundi 10 juin 2002 18:47
  À : 'Tomcat Users List'
  Objet : RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
  
  
  Check the mod_jk log and make sure the www.test.net requests
  are being forwarded to Tomcat.  If so, set the debug level
  on SimpleMapper1 in server.xml to 1 and examine the
  Tomcat log to see how the www.test.net requests are being
  handled differently from www.test.com requests.  I currently
  don't see anything in your config files that would cause this
  not to work.
  
  Note that the debug attributes should be set a numeric value
  rather than info.  I would guess this would be equivalent
  to setting it to zero.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:27 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
   
   
   Hi,
   
   I've Tomcat 3.3.1 and Apache running together with mod_jk.
   
   I'm trying to setup alias for VirtualHost in the tomcat 
  configuration
   but it doesnot work.
   
   * Here what i have in httpd.conf :
   
   NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.125:80
   
   VirtualHost 192.168.1.125:80
   DocumentRoot c:/adeuza/sites/fortunoclic
   ServerName www.test.fr
   ErrorLog c:\tmp\apache-error-testfr.log
   CustomLog c:\tmp\apache-access-testfr.log common
   /VirtualHost
   
   VirtualHost 192.168.1.125:80
   DocumentRoot c:/adeuza/sites/test
   ServerName www.test.com
   ServerAlias www.test.net
   ErrorLog c:\tmp\apache-error-testcom.log
   CustomLog c:\tmp\apache-error-testcom.log common
   /VirtualHost
   
   * And my apps-testfr.xml 
   
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
   webapps
 Host name=www.test.fr address=192.168.1.125:80
   Context path=/ 
docBase=c:/adeuza/sites/fortunoclic 
debug=info 
   /Context  
 /Host
   /webapps
   
   * And my apps-testcom.xml
   
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1

RE: Classpaths

2002-06-07 Thread Larry Isaacs

Since you are using Tomcat 3.3, see:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.html#configuring_classes

It describes how to add classes.  Item 2, describes two System
properties that can be used to add directories or jars to the
Common and Apps classloaders.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Muñoz Ordenes Andrés (Casa Matriz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:42 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Classpaths
 
 
  -Mensaje original-
  De: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Enviado el: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:39 PM
  Para: Tomcat Users List
  Asunto: RE: Classpaths
  
  
  Howdy,
  
  How can i do for add classes to Tomcat Classpath?... i have an
  application
  
  The short answer: in many many ways ;)
 
 hahahahaha... :D
 
  The long answer: depends on where you want the classes to 
 be visible.
  If you just want them for one web-app, add them to that web-app's
  /WEB-INF/classes directory.  Or package them as a jar and 
 add them to
  the /WEB-INF/lib directory.
 
 I can't do this... i mean, i must no move classes
 
  If you want the classes to be visible to more than one 
  web-app, you can
  put them in $CATALINA_HOME/classes, or again package them 
 up as a jar
  and put them in $CATALINA_HOME/lib.
 
 Mmmm... i have Tomcat 3.3... and i can't move classes...
 
 Another chance?
 
 Atte.
 Andrés Muñoz O.
 Fono: 690 3155
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3 and LDAP

2002-06-06 Thread Larry Isaacs

No.  Only Tomcat 4 provides JNDIRealm support.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Urtzi Larrazabal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:56 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List (E-mail)
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3 and LDAP
 
 
 
 
 I would like to know if Tomcat 3.3 has the JNDIRealm feature 
 to authentificate users with LDAP.
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: tomact not staring

2002-06-05 Thread Larry Isaacs

See item 2 under the (5) Troubleshooting: section of
RUNNING.txt in the Tomcat installation directory.  It
addresses this issue.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: puneet sachar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:09 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: tomact not staring
 
 
 sir i did that what already
 
 
 not working 
 
 is tomcat4.0.4 is for NT only as i'm using win 98
 
 Puneet
 
 
 
 --- jon wingfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  change the memory settings for the DOS console. When
  I run TC under windows
  I have the initial environment memory set to 4096
  (the maximum available
  through the UI).
  
  -Original Message-
  From: puneet sachar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 05 June 2002 07:06
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: tomact not staring
  
  
  hi developers
  
  
  i have installed tomcat 4.0.4
  and did everything as mention ...
  
  and in autoexec file mention set java_home as
  c:\jdk1.3
  
  
  still giving me error out of environment space
  
  when changes made to memory of the .bat file ..
  
  now saying java_home variable is not defien...
  
  this is starnge to me ..
  same working ta my home not in office
  
  
  vie my bat file and tell me what could be error
  
  
  --
  SET  JAVA_HOME=C:\JDK1.3
  SET  CATALINA_HOME=c:\Tomcat
  
  SET
 
 PATH=C:\JDK1.3\bin;C:\Tomcat\bin;C:\JMETER\jakarta-jmeter\bin;
 C:\Oracle\Ora8
  1\BIN;.;
  SET
 
 CLASSPATH=C:\jdk1.3\lib\tools.jar;C:\Tomcat\lib\jasper-compile
 r.jar;C:\Tomca
 
 t\lib\jasper-runtime.jar;C:\Tomcat\lib\naming-factory.jar;.;
  
 
 -
  
  regards
  Puneet
  
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
  http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
 http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

2002-06-05 Thread Larry Isaacs

If your docBase is set to /net/webapps then what
you describe should work.  If your docBase is set to
/net/webapps/test, then the .. in your include
is trying to go outside of the webapp, which is not
allowed.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths
 
 
 Hi;
 
 I'm using Tomcat 3.2
 
 I have a webapp defined on my system to be:
 /net/webapps
 
 Under the directory webapps I have several subdirectories 
 for jsps and various
 resources.
 
 In one file, /net/webapps/test/test.jsp, I am trying to use 
 this include directive
 %@ include file=../common/copyright.html %
 to include
 /net/webapps/common/copyright.html
 
 I keep getting error code 500 and the message bad file 
 argument to include
 
 Anyone have any idea of what is going on and how I can back 
 up with file paths?
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Steve
 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
 http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

2002-06-05 Thread Larry Isaacs

I don't know why it wouldn't work other than due
to a simple typo.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:48 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths
 
 
 My docbase is set to /net/webapps
 
 Still gives me bad argument to include file
 
 Steve
 --- Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If your docBase is set to /net/webapps then what
  you describe should work.  If your docBase is set to
  /net/webapps/test, then the .. in your include
  is trying to go outside of the webapp, which is not
  allowed.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:12 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths
   
   
   Hi;
   
   I'm using Tomcat 3.2
   
   I have a webapp defined on my system to be:
   /net/webapps
   
   Under the directory webapps I have several subdirectories 
   for jsps and various
   resources.
   
   In one file, /net/webapps/test/test.jsp, I am trying to use 
   this include directive
   %@ include file=../common/copyright.html %
   to include
   /net/webapps/common/copyright.html
   
   I keep getting error code 500 and the message bad file 
   argument to include
   
   Anyone have any idea of what is going on and how I can back 
   up with file paths?
   
   Thanks in advance
   
   Steve
   
   
   
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
   http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
   
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
   mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For 
   additional commands, 
   e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
 http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Help with Tomcat and IIS

2002-06-04 Thread Larry Isaacs

The isapi_redirect[or].dll is both a filter and an
extension.  The filter portion examines the request to
see if it should be forwarded to Tomcat. If so, the
request URI is saved in new header entries which are
added to the request and the request URI is replaced
with the extension-uri value.  This causes the
request to be processed by the extension portion of the
dll which handles the communications with Tomcat.

Your symptom is typical of having the isapi filter called
twice per request where even /jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll
is configured to be forwarded to Tomcat.  The second call to
the filter routine replaces the correctly request URI, saved
previously, with /jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll and the request
is now doomed to failure.

Since it appears you didn't make the mistake of adding
the Filter DLLs key, check to make sure the filter
appears only once in either the desired virtual host(s)
or in their parent node.  It should not appear at both
levels.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert A. Rogerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:07 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Help with Tomcat and IIS
 
 
 Hi Larry.  I checked my registry (NT4 SP6) and the only reference to
 islapi_rediector.dll is under 
 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SOFTWARE/Apache Software
 Foundation/Jakarta Isapi
 Redirector/1.0/extension_uri=/jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll. 
  I did notice
 in other docs that the redirector should only be entered for 
 Filter DLLs
 for Win98.  Could I be confused and the
 extension_uri=/jakarta/isapi_redictor.dll should not exist?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Rob
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:31 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Help with Tomcat and IIS
 
 
 The /jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll URI should never
 be forwarded to Tomcat.  It occurrence indicates that the
 isapi_redirector.dll filter is being called more than once
 per request.
 
 In the past this error was most often accomplished on
 WinNT/Win2k systems by adding the filter via the Admin
 console and incorrectly adding it again via the Filter DLLs
 registry key.  The Filter DLLs is for Win9x only.
 There have also been instances of the dll filter being
 added globally and to an individual web server causing
 it to be called twice.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Robert A. Rogerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:55 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Help with Tomcat and IIS
 
 
  I installed Tomcat 4.0.3 and followed the How To directions
  for redirecting
  when using IIS.  JSP pages are served correctly through
  Tomcat http://local
  host:8080/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp but when I try  and
  serve a simple jsp
  http://localhost/test.jsp where test.jsp is
  html
  head
  titleWelcome JSP/title
  /head
  body bgcolor=white
  h3 Welcome /h3
  pb Today is %= new java.util.Date() %.  Have a nice
  day! :-) /b/p
  /body
  /html
 
  I receive the error
  ...titleApache Tomcat/4.0.3 - Error report/title
  ...Apache Tomcat/4.0.3 - HTTP Status 404 -
  /jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll
  ...type/b Status report
  ...message/b u/jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll
  ...description/b uThe requested resource
  (/jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll)
  is not available.
  through IIS.
  I checked the authority to the /jakarta virtual directory and
  it does have
  Execute permission.
 
  Any ideas would be appreciated.
 
  Robert A. Rogerson
  Phone:   905-826-7761
  Cell:   416-562-1039
  Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Help with Tomcat and IIS

2002-06-03 Thread Larry Isaacs

The /jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll URI should never
be forwarded to Tomcat.  It occurrence indicates that the
isapi_redirector.dll filter is being called more than once
per request.

In the past this error was most often accomplished on
WinNT/Win2k systems by adding the filter via the Admin
console and incorrectly adding it again via the Filter DLLs
registry key.  The Filter DLLs is for Win9x only.
There have also been instances of the dll filter being
added globally and to an individual web server causing
it to be called twice.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert A. Rogerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:55 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Help with Tomcat and IIS
 
 
 I installed Tomcat 4.0.3 and followed the How To directions 
 for redirecting
 when using IIS.  JSP pages are served correctly through 
 Tomcat http://local
 host:8080/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp but when I try  and 
 serve a simple jsp
 http://localhost/test.jsp where test.jsp is
 html
 head
 titleWelcome JSP/title
 /head
 body bgcolor=white
 h3 Welcome /h3
 pb Today is %= new java.util.Date() %.  Have a nice 
 day! :-) /b/p
 /body
 /html
 
 I receive the error
 ...titleApache Tomcat/4.0.3 - Error report/title
 ...Apache Tomcat/4.0.3 - HTTP Status 404 - 
 /jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll
 ...type/b Status report
 ...message/b u/jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll
 ...description/b uThe requested resource 
 (/jakarta/isapi_redirector.dll)
 is not available.
 through IIS.
 I checked the authority to the /jakarta virtual directory and 
 it does have
 Execute permission.
 
 Any ideas would be appreciated.
 
 Robert A. Rogerson
 Phone:   905-826-7761
 Cell:   416-562-1039
 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Need Hel plz

2002-05-31 Thread Larry Isaacs

Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
will serve the page.  Other case incorrect versions will
return 404 not found errors.

I would highly recommend upgrading from 3.1.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Walid Mohammed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:44 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re:Need Hel plz
 
 
 
 
 
   correction .. my Tomcat ver is 3.1  not 4 ! ..sorry 
 
 Walid Al-Abbadi
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Need Hel plz

2002-05-31 Thread Larry Isaacs

For me, Tomcat 4.0.3 returns 404 for:

http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/dates/date.Jsp

What does it do in your case?

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Phillip Morelock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:20 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Need Hel plz
 
 
  Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
  a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
 
 Which versions have these fixes?
 
 I'm using 4.0.3 and it has the problem.
 
 cheers
 fillup
 
 
 On 5/31/02 5:54 AM, Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
  a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
  will serve the page.  Other case incorrect versions will
  return 404 not found errors.
  
  I would highly recommend upgrading from 3.1.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Walid Mohammed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:44 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re:Need Hel plz
  
  
  
  
  
correction .. my Tomcat ver is 3.1  not 4 ! ..sorry
  
  Walid Al-Abbadi
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Need Hel plz

2002-05-31 Thread Larry Isaacs

Windows XP.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Phillip Morelock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:00 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Need Hel plz
 
 
 which OS?
 
 
 On 5/31/02 11:43 AM, Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  For me, Tomcat 4.0.3 returns 404 for:
  
  http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/dates/date.Jsp
  
  What does it do in your case?
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Phillip Morelock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:20 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: Re: Need Hel plz
  
  
  Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
  a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
  
  Which versions have these fixes?
  
  I'm using 4.0.3 and it has the problem.
  
  cheers
  fillup
  
  
  On 5/31/02 5:54 AM, Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
  a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
  will serve the page.  Other case incorrect versions will
  return 404 not found errors.
  
  I would highly recommend upgrading from 3.1.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Walid Mohammed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:44 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re:Need Hel plz
  
  
  
  
  
correction .. my Tomcat ver is 3.1  not 4 ! ..sorry
  
  Walid Al-Abbadi
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Need Hel plz

2002-05-31 Thread Larry Isaacs

I'm using the zip.  I take it that Mac OS X is case insensitive.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Phillip Morelock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:06 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Need Hel plz
 
 
 Interesting.
 
 On Mac OS X -- I'm still having the problem as of 4.0.3, but 
 obviously not
 on Linux.  Haven't tried Windows.
 
 Just out of curiosity, how did you install it?  Using the exe 
 or the zip
 file?
 
 fillup
 
 On 5/31/02 12:02 PM, Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Windows XP.
  
  Larry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Phillip Morelock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:00 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: Re: Need Hel plz
  
  
  which OS?
  
  
  On 5/31/02 11:43 AM, Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  For me, Tomcat 4.0.3 returns 404 for:
  
  http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/dates/date.Jsp
  
  What does it do in your case?
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Phillip Morelock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:20 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: Re: Need Hel plz
  
  
  Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
  a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
  
  Which versions have these fixes?
  
  I'm using 4.0.3 and it has the problem.
  
  cheers
  fillup
  
  
  On 5/31/02 5:54 AM, Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Current releases of Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 3 don't have
  a problem with case sensitivity of .jsp.  Only .jsp
  will serve the page.  Other case incorrect versions will
  return 404 not found errors.
  
  I would highly recommend upgrading from 3.1.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Walid Mohammed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:44 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re:Need Hel plz
  
  
  
  
  
correction .. my Tomcat ver is 3.1  not 4 ! ..sorry
  
  Walid Al-Abbadi
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: moving from 3.2 to 3.31

2002-05-30 Thread Larry Isaacs

The contents of the web.xml is defined by the Servlet 2.2
spec, which hasn't changed.  More detail will be needed
to tell what is going wrong.  You can set the debug level
on SimpleMapper1 in server.xml to get more clues about
why your servlet isn't being found.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Maureen Barger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:22 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: moving from 3.2 to 3.31
 
 
 Hi -- I am having some trouble moving an application from 
 tomcat 3.2 to 3.31.
 In my server.xml, I have pointed the ContextXmlReader to look 
 at my custom 
 apps.xml. My context is mounts and I can access it. But in 
 the web.xml of 
 the application I have defined a servlet to map to a location 
 and it is not 
 loading -- I get a 404.
 i.e. servlet
   servlet-namebrand/servlet-name
   servlet-classJarBranderServlet/servlet-class
 /servlet
 
servlet-mapping
   servlet-namebrand/servlet-name
   url-pattern/brand/url-pattern
   /servlet-mapping
   servlet-mapping
   servlet-namebrand/servlet-name
   url-pattern/brand/*/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
 
 Has defining servlets changed in 3.31 as well? (So much else 
 has!) The only 
 clue in the docs is the application deployment doc, which 
 warns that it is 
 outdated.
 
 Maureen Barger, CIT/ID, Cornell University
 Ithaca, NY 14850
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mo.cit.cornell.edu/
 
 Nature goes her own way and all that to us seems an exception
 is really according to order.
 --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: I am trying to find the answer to this one for the last few days : Pl hep

2002-05-24 Thread Larry Isaacs

What is officially supported is documented in section 4 of
the RUNNING.txt document:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/RUNNING.txt
or
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/RUNNING.txt

If you want to deviate from this, I recommend you go ahead and
try it.  Then post if you run into problems for which you can't
find a workaround.  It is time consuming to predict what might
go wrong based on what you might or might not attempt to do in
your actual configuration.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Sankaranarayanan (Ganesh) Ganapathy 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:09 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: I am trying to find the answer to this one for the 
 last few days : Pl hep
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 I am resending this mail for the nth time hoping to get an 
 answers from the experts here.
 
 Anyway my question is if the following is a supported config:
 
 I want to run multiples instances of embedded Tomcat all 
 against the same base directory. Is such a configuration supported?
 
 Something like 
 
 C:\tomcatjava -Dcatalina.home=c:\tomcat 
 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina -config .\conf\server.xml start
 C:\tomcatjava -Dcatalina.home=c:\tomcat 
 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina -config .\conf1\server.xml start
 
 1. Can all the instance work off the same web application 
 files on disk - will there be any problem between the tomcat 
 instances all sharing the same web application files on disk?
 
 2. Will there be a problem with the work directory. I cant 
 seem to find an api to tell every embedded tomcat to use 
 different directories.
 
 Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 
 Thanx
 Ganesh
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: I am trying to find the answer to this one for the last few days : Pl hep

2002-05-24 Thread Larry Isaacs



 -Original Message-
 From: Sankaranarayanan (Ganesh) Ganapathy 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:47 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: I am trying to find the answer to this one for 
 the last few days : Pl hep
 
 
 Hi Larry,
 
 Thanx for writing. 
 
 I am just trying to understand from tomcat developers like 
 you if there is anything in the way Tomcat4.0.3 works today 
 that forbids such a configuration - why the official 
 configurations supported mandates that every tomcat instance 
 have its own base directory.

I'm not intimately familiar with the internals of Tomcat 4
and its batch files, but I suspect there are numerous pitfalls
to trying to have multiple instances of Tomcat 4 share
CATALINA_BASE subdirectories.  The documented form of running
multiple Tomcat 4 instances is supported because it is simplest
way for the multiple instances not to step on each other.
Documenting possible deviations from this isn't practical.  It
would be much harder to explain and it would be much easier for
users to encounter problems.  Thus, it isn't worth the
developer's time to pursue this as a feature beyond what has
already been done.

Cheers,
Larry

 
 My configuration is simple - embedded tomcat supports stand 
 alone or ajp13 connector mode with global defaults(like 
 logger etc). All contexts are loaded with default properties 
 using ((Deployer)host).install method. 
 
 your help is much appreciated.
 
 Thanx
 Ganesh
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:35 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: I am trying to find the answer to this one for 
 the last few
 days : Pl hep
 
 
 What is officially supported is documented in section 4 of
 the RUNNING.txt document:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/RUNNING.txt
 or
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/RUNNING.txt
 
 If you want to deviate from this, I recommend you go ahead and
 try it.  Then post if you run into problems for which you can't
 find a workaround.  It is time consuming to predict what might
 go wrong based on what you might or might not attempt to do in
 your actual configuration.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sankaranarayanan (Ganesh) Ganapathy 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:09 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: I am trying to find the answer to this one for the 
  last few days : Pl hep
  
  
  Hi All,
  
  I am resending this mail for the nth time hoping to get an 
  answers from the experts here.
  
  Anyway my question is if the following is a supported config:
  
  I want to run multiples instances of embedded Tomcat all 
  against the same base directory. Is such a configuration supported?
  
  Something like 
  
  C:\tomcatjava -Dcatalina.home=c:\tomcat 
  org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina -config .\conf\server.xml start
  C:\tomcatjava -Dcatalina.home=c:\tomcat 
  org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina -config 
 .\conf1\server.xml start
  
  1. Can all the instance work off the same web application 
  files on disk - will there be any problem between the tomcat 
  instances all sharing the same web application files on disk?
  
  2. Will there be a problem with the work directory. I cant 
  seem to find an api to tell every embedded tomcat to use 
  different directories.
  
  Any help will be greatly appreciated!
  
  Thanx
  Ganesh
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands, 
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars

2002-05-21 Thread Larry Isaacs

The symptom you describe is easily achievable.  The main
point is that additionalJars adds jars to multiple webapps
the same as if you copied jdom.jar to each WEB-INF/lib.
You could try putting jdom.jar in your test webapp's
WEB-INF/lib, remove the additionalJars, and see if the error
still occurs.

I would not be surprised if it did.  If a servlet depends on
another class that in turn depends on jdom.jar classes, and
that class lives below the webapp classloader, then you
might see the symptom you describe.  The class in the lower
classloader can't see the classes in the webapp classloader
unless special programming is implemented to make it possible,
such as using the thread context classloader.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:58 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars
 
 
  From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  After adding the jdom.jar and making the server.xml changes
  you describe, I find that I can compile and display the
  following JSP page:
 
 Hrmm, ok well I am going to rip everything off the system and 
 try again. 
 Perhaps something has been convoluted to the point that it 
 just is not 
 working anymore.
 
  From a clean install, all I should have to do is put my 
 context classes in 
 place, add the additionalJars attribute, place the jdom.jar, 
 and start it 
 up, right?
 
 If I am missing anything, please let me know. Hopefully this 
 time it will 
 work. :)
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mario-
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars

2002-05-20 Thread Larry Isaacs

That's basically correct.  The jar is added to the
web application's classloader classpath.  The web
application's classloader is switched in as the context
class during request handling for that context.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:23 PM
 To: TomcatUser
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars 
 
 
 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:30:33 -0400  
 
 Both of those should work.  There could be some
 classloader issue involved.  Can you provide a test
 case of what you are trying to do?
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
 So the base case I am trying is simply allowing access
 to the jdom.jar from my webapps. This is to simply
 test that the additionalJars property is working.
 
 Actually, I just thought of something. The
 additionalJars value simply adds to the context
 classloader's classpath? It would not affect the other
 loaders such as apps and common?
 
 Is that a correct statement?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Mario-
 
 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
 http://launch.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3 as a service

2002-05-20 Thread Larry Isaacs

The C-runtime routine used for processing the individual settings
doesn't support quotes.  You have to add the appropriate quotes
in the wrapper.cmd_line setting.  This has already been done in
Tomcat 3.3.1.  Unfortunately, the handling doesn't deal with
substituting empty parameters.  As a result, an improvement to
this file in Tomcat 3.3.1 causes a problem.  See:

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/

for details on dealing with this problem.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Dave Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:53 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3 as a service
 Importance: High
 
 
 Hi,
I trying to follow the instructions for installing 
 Tomcat 3.3 as
 an NT Service
 on an NT Server 4 SP6A system.
 
 I'm encountering a problem with I think relates to my syntax in the
 wrapper.properties
 file, as the installation directory for my tomcat has a space in it.
 
 I originally coded the two key definitions in the 
 wrapper.properties file
 as :-
 
 wrapper.tomcat_home=G:\Apache Group\jakarta-tomcat-3.3
 wrapper.java_home=g:\jdk1.3.1_02
 
 As this is where I have installed the Tomcat and JDK code 
 respectively.
 
 When I try to start the tomcat service, I get 'Tomcat Failed 
 to start', and
 in the jvm.stderr file in the logs directory, I have the message :-
 
 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
 Group\jakarta-tomcat-3/3\lib\tomcat/jar
 Exception in thread main
 
 From this I deduced, possibly erroneously, that the space in 
 the directory
 path for Tomcat
 was causing the problem.
 
 However, I have tried every combination of quotes I can think 
 of to enclose
 the
 tomcat_home directory, and they all lead to a Tomcat Failed To Start
 message, and
 this time no logs either.
 
 Can you help me with the coding of wrapper.properties to get 
 this to work ?
 I tried
 searching on the jakarta site and the general web I didn't 
 find anything
 that helped.
 The only worked examples of a wrapper.properties file I found all used
 directory
 names with no spaces in them.
 
 I guess I could start again by uninstalling tomcat and all my 
 webapps and
 install
 tomcat in a directory with no spaces, but I would really rather
 not..
 
 Needless to say, everything works just fine running the 
 startup.bat file,
 but I would
 prefer to run this as a service, as it makes the system 
 bootup automation
 easier, as
 I can establish dependencies between services, and also monitoring is
 easier for services.
 
 Cheers, Dave S.
 
 Senior I.T. Specialist - Systems  Network Management, EMEA 
 ATS-PIC Tivoli
 Unit
 E-Mail IdsInternet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Internal:
 SWIFTDS@IBMGB
 Phone +44 (0) 1962-817087 (DDI),  Mobile +44 (0) 
 772-0411-717, Fax +44 (0)
 1962-818191
 ***
 * QUALITY Means never having to say you're sorry *
 ***
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars

2002-05-20 Thread Larry Isaacs

After adding the jdom.jar and making the server.xml changes
you describe, I find that I can compile and display the
following JSP page:

- test.jsp -
%
org.jdom.JDOMException jdomExc = new org.jdom.JDOMException();
%
This is a test.


This seems to indicate that the jdom.jar is available to
the web application.  I also tried a simple servlet which was
loaded on startup.  It too was successful.  It is likely that
your NoClassDefFound is due to a class in a lower classloader
that requires jdom.jar to be visible.  Using additionalJars
is equivalent to putting the jar in the WEB-INF/lib of all
web applications.  It offers the same visibility.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:38 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars
 
 
  From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  That's basically correct.  The jar is added to the
  web application's classloader classpath.  The web
  application's classloader is switched in as the context
  class during request handling for that context.
  
  Larry
 
 Ok, I just wanted to make sure of that. So I have my context 
 classes in a 
 jar that reside under my docBase/WEB-INF/lib directory. I place the 
 shared jdom.jar under the Tomcat/lib/container directory, and in my 
 server.conf file I make the following changes to LoaderInterceptor11.
 
 additionalJars=jdom.jar
 jarSeparator=;
 
 When I start tomcat up, it starts to load my context which 
 has a couple of 
 LoadOnStartup specified servlets. This servlets fail to load with a 
 NoClassDefFound Exception because the context can't find 
 org/jdom/JDOMException.
 
 Can you think of anything else I can try or do in order to make the 
 additionalJars property work? I feel like this should work 
 and that this 
 feature should be doing exactly what I want it to be doing, 
 unfortunately I 
 have yet to see it function.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Mario-
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars

2002-05-17 Thread Larry Isaacs

Both of those should work.  There could be some
classloader issue involved.  Can you provide a test
case of what you are trying to do?

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:09 PM
 To: TomcatUser
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars
 
 
 From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:09:12 -0400 
  
 What did you set the additionalJars attribute to and
 where did you put the jdom.jar?
 
 Larry
 
 The additionalJars attribute I tried setting to a
 couple of different things. One was an absolute path
 with the jdom.jar located at that absolute path.
 
 For example, additionalJars=D:/test/jdom.jar.
 
 I also tried setting it to just jdom.jar and putting
 the jar in the Tomcat/lib/container directory.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Mario-
 
 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
 http://launch.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars configuration

2002-05-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

This was originally added as a way to add jasper.jar
to each web application so it could be used with
extensions other than .jsp.  It worked for me at the
time.  What exactly is the problem you are experiencing.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:45 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars configuration
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with using the 
 additionalJars attribute of the LoaderInterceptor11 module 
 within Tomcat.
 
 There was a thread on classloaders that I started a couple of 
 weeks ago, 
 and a possible work-round was suggested by using the 
 additionalJars feature.
 
 I am just trying to make a base case work, nothing fancy.I am 
 trying to 
 access a class from additionalJars from a class in my servlet 
 context. Has 
 anyone tried to use this feature, or does any one know if there is 
 something more that I need to do to get this to work?
 
 Any experiences or ideas would be greatly appreciated!
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mario-
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: jndi under tomcat3.x ? (deploying a tomcat4.x webapp on tomcat3.x server)

2002-05-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

I'm afraid Tomcat 3.3.x doesn't support the Resource element
that Tomcat 4.x does for setting up such resources.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: chas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:18 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: jndi under tomcat3.x ? (deploying a tomcat4.x webapp 
 on tomcat3.x server) 
 
 
 I've built my webapp using a JNDI datasource resource, running
 on Tomcat4.  I had no problem setting up the JNDI environment. 
 
 Now, I'm trying to run the webapp on a server which for one 
 reason or another, has Tomcat3.3. Am finding that the JNDI setup
 is not working, even though I simply deployed a war file (so 
 web.xml should be correct) and copied over the server.xml config
 from my development (Tomcat4) server. 
 
 Then I checked 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/index.html
 (yeah, perhaps I should have done that *before* trying to deploy g)
 and don't see any JNDI reference.  Did Tomcat 3.x have JNDI support ?
 The error messages (below) suggest so : 
 
 % 2002-05-16 06:56:24 - Ctx( /myapp ): Exception in: R( /myapp +
 /Lists/index.jsp + null) - javax.servlet.ServletException:
 javax.naming.NoInitialContextException: Need to specify class name in
 environment or system property, or as an applet parameter, or in an
 application resource file:  java.naming.factory.initial
 at
 org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(
 PageContextImp
 l.java:459)
 
 
 Given that I'm unable to upgrade to Tomcat4 (since it's running on 
 a VPS - Virtual Private Server), will it be possible to run my
 JNDI-dependent webapp on the Tomcat3 server ? 
 
 Steps taken so far : 
 
 1. Deployed the war file.
 
 2. Added this to the server.xml : 
 
 Context path=/myapp docBase=myapp reloadable=true
   Resource name=jdbc/mydb auth=Container
 type=javax.sql.DataSource/
   ResourceParams name=jdbc/mydb
 parameter
   nameuser/name
   value/value
 /parameter
 parameter
   namepassword/name
   value/value
 /parameter
 parameter
   namedriverClassName/name
   valueorg.gjt.mm.mysql.Driver/value
 /parameter
 parameter
   namedriverName/name
   valuejdbc:mysql://localhost/mydb/value
 /parameter
   /ResourceParams
 /Context
 
 3. Copied the following files from tomcat4_home/common/lib
to tomcat3_home/lib (since Tomcat3 does not /common/lib)
 
- jdbc2_0-stdext.jar
- mm.mysql-2.0.13-bin.jar
 
 
 
 However, I notice that tomcat3_home/lib does not have the
 naming-common.jar and naming-resources.jar, so I have a sneaky
 feeling that I'm barking up the wrong tree... 
 
 cheers,
 
 chas
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars configuration

2002-05-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

What did you set the additionalJars attribute to and
where did you put the jdom.jar?

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:03 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars configuration
 
 
  From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  This was originally added as a way to add jasper.jar
  to each web application so it could be used with
  extensions other than .jsp.  It worked for me at the
  time.  What exactly is the problem you are experiencing.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
 
 Hey,
 
 I am just trying a simple case where I put jdom.jar in the 
 additionalJars 
 tag and see if my context classes can reference it. So far it 
 seems like 
 they cannot, but as I stated, I am unsure if there are other 
 configurations 
 I have to make.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Mario-
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Trying to start tomcat 3.3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

The stack trace should give you a clue about who is
unhappy.  It could be the result of a typo in the server.xml.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Jose, Babu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:27 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Trying to start tomcat 3.3.1
 
 
 I am trying to start tomcat 3.3.1 and is getting the 
 following warning. 
 
 
 org.apache.tomcat.core.TomcatException: Root cause - Option 
 unsupported by
 protocol: create
 
 
 Any idea please..
 
 Thanks
 Babu
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for servlets on 3.3.1

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Chris,

Before I start investigating, would you confirm that this is
mod_jk built from jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native or
jakarta-tomcat/src/native source.  In the mean time, feel
free to use multiple:

   JkMount /context path/servlet/* worker

Also, unless you need special settings, the Tomcat 3.3.1
generated config files should be close to what you are looking
for.  Try bin/startup jkconf to generate them and take a
look.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:37 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for servlets on 3.3.1
 
 
 Ok... some more information...
 
 JkMount /*/servlet/* ajp13
 
 It turns out, that this line breaks apache! Warning warning 
 warning don't
 use it! I just spent 5 hours recompiling apache, checking 
 httpd.conf etc et
 al to discover after a few hours sleep and a coffee that it's 
 actually this
 line in mod_jk.conf that's breaking my websites right now and 
 not apache
 being weird.
 
 Now, to clarify a bit:
 
 - I used to run tomcat 3.2.2, with the mod_jk that was 
 released with it, and
 the following line successfully mapped servlets to an ajp13 worker:
 
   JkMount /servlet/* ajp13
 
 - I now run tomcat 3.3.1, with the new mod_jk, and that line does not
 successfully map servlets to an ajp13 worker. It fails, saying
 map_uri_to_worker, done without a match
 - the equivalent line for JSPs works fine for old tomcat  
 new tomcat - no
 problems there.
 - I tried adding /*/servlet/* ajp13 as a workaround - maybe 
 the uri match
 was failing because of the leading webappname i.e. the uri 
 would look
 like: /testapp/servlet/index . Initially, I had success - it was
 successfully mapped to an ajp13 worker. However, it also 
 mapped *everything*
 else, regardless of how the path looked (html, directories, 
 gifs, jpgs etc
 etc etc) that lived in the normal apache htdocs directories. 
 In other words,
 tomcat had taken over apache! insert growling tomcat noise here
 
 But, this still leaves me with the basic problem, which is 
 that the stock
 standard mod_jk.conf file isn't mapping servlets correctly.
 
 So, some questions...
 
 1. Is my mod_jk.conf file correct?
 IfModule mod_jk.c
 JkWorkersFile /usr/local/tomcat/conf/jk/workers.properties
 JkLogFile  /var/log/tomcat/jk.log
 JkLogLevel error
 JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
 JkMount /servlet/* ajp13
 /IfModule
 
 2. Is mod_jk behaving correctly?
 3. If mod_jk isn't behaving correctly, how do I fix it / or get more
 information from it?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Chris
 
 |-Original Message-
 |From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 |Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:24
 |To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 |Subject: RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for 
 servlets on 3.3.1
 |
 |
 |The jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native sources have small 
 improvements
 |and bug fixes over that found in jakarta-tomcat/src/native.  
 One of the
 |improvements is support for JkMount /*/... that you discovered.
 |
 |Cheers,
 |Larry
 |
 | -Original Message-
 | From: Chris Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:21 AM
 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 | Subject: RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for
 |servlets on 3.3.1
 |
 |
 | Hi Larry,
 |
 | No, I haven't tried:
 |
 | JkMount /testapp/servlet/* ajp13
 |
 | doing so now...
 |
 | I upgraded to the latest mod_jk.so as well from
 | jakarta.apache.org. I tried
 | both with and without eapi support to see if it made a
 |difference (and
 | rebuilt apache with and without eapi support accordingly.
 | Currently it's
 | on).
 |
 | Ok... so... adding your suggestion above works...
 |
 | Previously, I haven't had to do this. I also tried adding:
 |
 | JkMount */servlet/* ajp13
 |
 | doesn't work but:
 |
 | JkMount /*/servlet/* ajp13
 |
 | does work.
 |
 | Has the way mod_jk parses paths changed in the latest version?
 |
 | Cheers,
 |
 | Chris
 |
 |
 |  Hi Chris,
 | 
 |  It is not clear if you tried:
 | 
 | JkMount /testapp/servlet/* ajp13
 | 
 |  I assume you build the mod_jk.so from Tomcat 3.3.1's
 | source.  Using a
 |  mod_jk from Tomcat 3.2.x has the potential to hang.
 | 
 |  Cheers,
 |  Larry
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | --
 | To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 | mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 | For
 | additional commands,
 | e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
 |
 |--
 |To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Sorry it missed getting into the documentation beyond the
readme-3.3.1, but Tomcat 3.3.1 now supports a SingleThreadModel
pooling, which is enabled by default.  Thus, this is normal
behavior.  If you wish to disable the pooling, modify the
server.xml to contain:

Servlet22Interceptor useSTMPool=false /

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy Eastham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:24 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help
 
 
 Stuart,
 
 You're extending Thread - everything that is mapped to a 
 Tomcat request must
 extend HttpServlet.  Tomcat is trying to cast your TestTunnel class to
 HttpServlet, which is failing.
 
 Andy
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Stuart Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 15 May 2002 11:56
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help
 
 
 
  Hello all,
 
  I'm having problems trying to write a HttpTunnel for java objects
  in Tomcat.
  For some reason I'm getting a ClassCastException. I don't 
 understand this.
  I've even tried forcing it as you can see in my code below. 
 The exception
  that i'm getting is not very clear and i can't put my finger on it.
 
  I have attached the exception from Apache/Tomcat and the code for
  the tunnel
  at the bottom of this email. If you can help I would be 
 very grateful.
 
  Regards,
  Stuart Stephen
 
  --
  --
  
 
  Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 - HTTP Status 500 - Internal Server Error
 
  --
  --
  
 
  type Exception report
 
  message Internal Server Error
 
  description The server encountered an internal error (Internal
  Server Error)
  that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
 
  exception
 
  java.lang.ClassCastException: TestTunnel
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(StandardWrapper.
 java:820)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.
  java:615)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.servlets.InvokerServlet.serveRequest(InvokerSe
  rvlet.java
  :396)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.servlets.InvokerServlet.doGet(InvokerServl
 et.java:180)
  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740)
  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(A
  pplication
  FilterChain.java:247)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(Applicati
  onFilterCh
  ain.java:193)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapp
  erValve.ja
  va:243)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  66)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
  java:472)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:943)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardConte
  xtValve.ja
  va:201)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  66)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve.invoke(CertificatesVa
  lve.java:2
  46)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  64)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
  java:472)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:943)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContex
 t.java:2344)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValv
  e.java:164
  )
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  66)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispat
  cherValve.
  java:170)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  64)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValv
  e.java:170
  )
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  64)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValv
 e.java:462)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  64)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
  java:472)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:943)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngine
  Valve.java
  :163)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
  ine.java:5
  66)
  at
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
  java:472)
  at
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:943)
  at
  
 

RE: SingleThreadModel under Tomcat 3.3.1 is not working???

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Sorry it missed getting into the documentation beyond the
readme-3.3.1, but Tomcat 3.3.1 now supports a SingleThreadModel
pooling, which is enabled by default.  Thus, this is normal
behavior.  If you wish to disable the pooling, modify the
server.xml to contain:

Servlet22Interceptor useSTMPool=false /

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Atnite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:38 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: SingleThreadModel under Tomcat 3.3.1 is not working???
 
 
 Hello there,
 I've got a question. I've made a servlet that is meant to be run using
 single thread model. It was made using JBuilder 5. When I run it under
 JBuilder's supplied Tomcat 3.2 hosting this servlet, it is 
 working exactly
 as expected - requests are queued and one is served at a 
 time. But, when I
 run the very same servlet under Tomcat 3.3.1, despite that 
 I've implemented
 SingleThreadModel in servlet and even made extra 
 synchronization, it still
 has no effect - requests are served all at the time of their arrival.
 The question is - is it a bug of Tomcat 3.3.1 or I miss 
 something (probably
 in Tomcat configuration files).
 Thanks
 
 
 
 _
 
 Do You Yahoo!?
 
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Please ignore the last response.  Lousy aim when clicking to
make a reply.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:25 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help
 
 
 Sorry it missed getting into the documentation beyond the
 readme-3.3.1, but Tomcat 3.3.1 now supports a SingleThreadModel
 pooling, which is enabled by default.  Thus, this is normal
 behavior.  If you wish to disable the pooling, modify the
 server.xml to contain:
 
 Servlet22Interceptor useSTMPool=false /
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy Eastham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:24 AM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: RE: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help
  
  
  Stuart,
  
  You're extending Thread - everything that is mapped to a 
  Tomcat request must
  extend HttpServlet.  Tomcat is trying to cast your 
 TestTunnel class to
  HttpServlet, which is failing.
  
  Andy
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Stuart Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 15 May 2002 11:56
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: HTTP Tunnelling problem?? Please help
  
  
  
   Hello all,
  
   I'm having problems trying to write a HttpTunnel for java objects
   in Tomcat.
   For some reason I'm getting a ClassCastException. I don't 
  understand this.
   I've even tried forcing it as you can see in my code below. 
  The exception
   that i'm getting is not very clear and i can't put my 
 finger on it.
  
   I have attached the exception from Apache/Tomcat and the code for
   the tunnel
   at the bottom of this email. If you can help I would be 
  very grateful.
  
   Regards,
   Stuart Stephen
  
   --
   --
   
  
   Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 - HTTP Status 500 - Internal Server Error
  
   --
   --
   
  
   type Exception report
  
   message Internal Server Error
  
   description The server encountered an internal error (Internal
   Server Error)
   that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
  
   exception
  
   java.lang.ClassCastException: TestTunnel
 at
   
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(StandardWrapper.
  java:820)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.
   java:615)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.servlets.InvokerServlet.serveRequest(InvokerSe
   rvlet.java
   :396)
 at
   
  org.apache.catalina.servlets.InvokerServlet.doGet(InvokerServl
  et.java:180)
 at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740)
 at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(A
   pplication
   FilterChain.java:247)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(Applicati
   onFilterCh
   ain.java:193)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapp
   erValve.ja
   va:243)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   66)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
   java:472)
 at
   
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:943)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardConte
   xtValve.ja
   va:201)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   66)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve.invoke(CertificatesVa
   lve.java:2
   46)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   64)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
   java:472)
 at
   
  
 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:943)
 at
   
  org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContex
  t.java:2344)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValv
   e.java:164
   )
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   66)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispat
   cherValve.
   java:170)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   64)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValv
   e.java:170
   )
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   64)
 at
   
  org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValv
  e.java:462)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invokeNext(StandardPipel
   ine.java:5
   64)
 at
   org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.
   java:472

RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside $tomcat_home$/webapps?

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

I don't believe Tomcat 3.2.x supports auto-serving the
webapps directory for hosts other than the default host.
However, this is supported in Tomcat 3.3.x.  The
AutoWebApp ... element in the server.xml file supports
specifying the directory and host, e.g.:

AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=DEFAULT /
AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=www.domain.com /

For details see:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.html#AutoWebApp

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:58 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put 
 inside $tomcat_home$/webapps?
 
 
 Everyone must have gone home...I'm really hoping that someone 
 can help with
 this, it seems like it would be a common problem.
 
 Tomcat 3.2.x will not find files inside a webapp unless that webapp is
 specifically declared inside each virtual host in the 
 server.xml file.  I
 want to be able to put all my webapps inside 
 $tomcat_home$/webapps so that
 they will automatically be found.  Since we have many virtual 
 hosts, each
 using several different webapps, is there any way to avoid 
 the myWebapp
 context entry below for hundreds of diffent virtual hosts?
 
 
 Host name=www.domain.com
  Context path=
  docBase=/usr/local/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs
  crossContext=false
  debug=0
  reloadable=true
  /Context
 
  Context path=/myWebapp
  docBase=/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/myWebapp
  crossContext=true
  debug=0
  reloadable=true
  trusted=false
  /Context
 /Host
 
 
 
 Please help!  We've been banging our heads on this all day!
 
 Thanks
 
 Brandon
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:06 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside
 $tomcat_home$/webapps?
 
 
 I have many virtual hosts.  Right now, they all access a 
 webapp because I
 have set the context to that webapp inside their Host tag 
 in server.xml.
 I would like to change it so that all I have to do is put the 
 webapp inside
 $tomcat_home$/webapps.  Is this possible so that I can avoid 
 the redundant
 entries in server.xml, or does virtual hosting cause a 
 problem with this?  I
 am using tomcat 3.2.4, thanks in advance for any help!
 
 
 Brandon
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside $tomcat_home$/webapps?

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Yes, one AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=your.virtual.host.name /
for each virtual host.  I would also recommend reviewing the
doc/readme file where important differences between Tomcat 3.2.x
and Tomcat 3.3 are mentioned.  There is a fair amount of new content
in the User's Guide as well.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:59 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put 
 inside $tomcat_home$/webapps?
 
 
 Larry,
 
 Thanks a ton for the clarification!  If I upgrade to 3.3.x 
 and want every
 webapp inside the webapps folder to automatically be deployed 
 for every
 virtual host, how do I specify the host attribute?
 
 Do I have to add AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=www.domain.com / to
 server.xml for each vhost, or am I missing something still?  
 I read the
 documentation and am still somewhat confused...
 
 Brandon
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:38 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside
 $tomcat_home$/webapps?
 
 
 I don't believe Tomcat 3.2.x supports auto-serving the
 webapps directory for hosts other than the default host.
 However, this is supported in Tomcat 3.3.x.  The
 AutoWebApp ... element in the server.xml file supports
 specifying the directory and host, e.g.:
 
 AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=DEFAULT /
 AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=www.domain.com /
 
 For details see:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.htm
 l#AutoWebApp
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:58 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put
  inside $tomcat_home$/webapps?
 
 
  Everyone must have gone home...I'm really hoping that someone
  can help with
  this, it seems like it would be a common problem.
 
  Tomcat 3.2.x will not find files inside a webapp unless 
 that webapp is
  specifically declared inside each virtual host in the
  server.xml file.  I
  want to be able to put all my webapps inside
  $tomcat_home$/webapps so that
  they will automatically be found.  Since we have many virtual
  hosts, each
  using several different webapps, is there any way to avoid
  the myWebapp
  context entry below for hundreds of diffent virtual hosts?
 
 
  Host name=www.domain.com
   Context path=
   docBase=/usr/local/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs
   crossContext=false
   debug=0
   reloadable=true
   /Context
 
   Context path=/myWebapp
   docBase=/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/myWebapp
   crossContext=true
   debug=0
   reloadable=true
   trusted=false
   /Context
  /Host
 
 
 
  Please help!  We've been banging our heads on this all day!
 
  Thanks
 
  Brandon
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:06 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside
  $tomcat_home$/webapps?
 
 
  I have many virtual hosts.  Right now, they all access a
  webapp because I
  have set the context to that webapp inside their Host tag
  in server.xml.
  I would like to change it so that all I have to do is put the
  webapp inside
  $tomcat_home$/webapps.  Is this possible so that I can avoid
  the redundant
  entries in server.xml, or does virtual hosting cause a
  problem with this?  I
  am using tomcat 3.2.4, thanks in advance for any help!
 
 
  Brandon
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside $tomcat _home$/webapps?

2002-05-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Tomcat 4.x uses a different architecture from Tomcat 3.3.x,
which is why their server.xml files contain very different
contents.  Thus, AutoWebApp isn't a supported element in
the 4.x server.xml.  You can probably accomplish the same
thing with multiple host elements, but not without a bit
more duplication of server.xml content than Tomcat 3.3.1.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: August Detlefsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:40 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put 
 inside $tomcat _home$/webapps?
 
 
 Is this also supported in TC 4.x? 
 
 
 
 --- Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I don't believe Tomcat 3.2.x supports auto-serving the
  webapps directory for hosts other than the default host.
  However, this is supported in Tomcat 3.3.x.  The
  AutoWebApp ... element in the server.xml file supports
  specifying the directory and host, e.g.:
  
  AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=DEFAULT /
  AutoWebApp dir=webapps host=www.domain.com /
  
  For details see:
  
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.htm
 l#AutoWebApp
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:58 PM
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: RE: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put 
   inside $tomcat_home$/webapps?
   
   
   Everyone must have gone home...I'm really hoping that someone 
   can help with
   this, it seems like it would be a common problem.
   
   Tomcat 3.2.x will not find files inside a webapp unless 
 that webapp
  is
   specifically declared inside each virtual host in the 
   server.xml file.  I
   want to be able to put all my webapps inside 
   $tomcat_home$/webapps so that
   they will automatically be found.  Since we have many virtual 
   hosts, each
   using several different webapps, is there any way to avoid 
   the myWebapp
   context entry below for hundreds of diffent virtual hosts?
   
   
   Host name=www.domain.com
Context path=
docBase=/usr/local/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs
crossContext=false
debug=0
reloadable=true
/Context
   
Context path=/myWebapp
docBase=/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/myWebapp
crossContext=true
debug=0
reloadable=true
trusted=false
/Context
   /Host
   
   
   
   Please help!  We've been banging our heads on this all day!
   
   Thanks
   
   Brandon
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:06 PM
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: Can all virtual hosts use a webapp that is put inside
   $tomcat_home$/webapps?
   
   
   I have many virtual hosts.  Right now, they all access a 
   webapp because I
   have set the context to that webapp inside their Host tag 
   in server.xml.
   I would like to change it so that all I have to do is put the 
   webapp inside
   $tomcat_home$/webapps.  Is this possible so that I can avoid 
   the redundant
   entries in server.xml, or does virtual hosting cause a 
   problem with this?  I
   am using tomcat 3.2.4, thanks in advance for any help!
   
   
   Brandon
   
   
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
   mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For 
   additional commands, 
   e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
 http://launch.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for servlets on 3.3.1

2002-05-14 Thread Larry Isaacs

Hi Chris,

It is not clear if you tried:

JkMount /testapp/servlet/* ajp13

I assume you build the mod_jk.so from Tomcat 3.3.1's source.  Using
a mod_jk from Tomcat 3.2.x has the potential to hang.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:00 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for servlets on 3.3.1
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm running Tomcat 3.3.1, Sun Java 1.3.1, and Apache 1.3.23 
 on Redhat Linux
 7.2.
 
 Have been using an earlier version of mod_jk fine for a long time with
 Tomcat 3.2.1. I upgraded to 3.3.1 the other night to fix some problems
 addressed by 3.3.1, and thought I had it all sussed... 
 insert spooky music
 here
 
 mod jk is failing to pass requests for servlets to tomcat 
 properly - it
 appears that it's not matching the string 
 /mywebapp/servlet/myservlet
 properly, and leaving it to Apache to handle, who promptly 
 returns a 404,
 as you expect. jsp files are working fine.
 
 If I surf directly to Tomcat on 8080, the servlets are 
 running fine, so I
 think the problem is with mod jk and not Tomcat itself.
 
 If I enable warn level in mod_jk.conf, I see the following:
 
 [Tue May 14 22:47:57 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (351)]: Into
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker
 [Tue May 14 22:47:57 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (368)]: 
 Attempting to map
 URI '/testapp/servlet/index'
 [Tue May 14 22:47:57 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (456)]:
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match
 
 
 -
 
 The webapp is called testapp. mod_jk.conf looks like:
 
 LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
 AddModule mod_jk.c
 
 IfModule mod_jk.c
 JkWorkersFile /usr/local/tomcat/conf/jk/workers.properties
 JkLogFile  /var/log/tomcat/jk.log
 JkLogLevel warn
 JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
 JkMount /servlet/* ajp13
 /IfModule
 
 -
 
 Originally I experienced this problem with Apache 1.3.17, and rebuilt
 Apache tonight as 1.3.23 as I was adding PHP support, and 
 figured that it
 might shake the monkey off this one's back...
 
 If I add the servlet manually to mod_jk.conf ala...
 
 JkMount /testapp/servlet/index ajp13
 
 then this single servlet works ok... It appears to only be 
 breaking when
 it's matching '*'...
 
 Any ideas as to what it could be? What other information do you need?
 
 Cheers,
 
 
 Chris Herrmann (wishing upon a star tonight...)
 Far Edge Technology
 
 p. 02 99553640
 f. 02 99547994
 m. 0403 393309
 http://www.faredge.com.au
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for servlets on 3.3.1

2002-05-14 Thread Larry Isaacs

The jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native sources have small improvements
and bug fixes over that found in jakarta-tomcat/src/native.  One of the
improvements is support for JkMount /*/... that you discovered.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:21 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: mod_jk not mapping uri successfully for servlets on 3.3.1
 
 
 Hi Larry,
 
 No, I haven't tried:
 
 JkMount /testapp/servlet/* ajp13
 
 doing so now...
 
 I upgraded to the latest mod_jk.so as well from 
 jakarta.apache.org. I tried
 both with and without eapi support to see if it made a difference (and
 rebuilt apache with and without eapi support accordingly. 
 Currently it's
 on).
 
 Ok... so... adding your suggestion above works...
 
 Previously, I haven't had to do this. I also tried adding:
 
 JkMount */servlet/* ajp13
 
 doesn't work but:
 
 JkMount /*/servlet/* ajp13
 
 does work.
 
 Has the way mod_jk parses paths changed in the latest version?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Chris
 
 
  Hi Chris,
 
  It is not clear if you tried:
 
 JkMount /testapp/servlet/* ajp13
 
  I assume you build the mod_jk.so from Tomcat 3.3.1's 
 source.  Using a
  mod_jk from Tomcat 3.2.x has the potential to hang.
 
  Cheers,
  Larry
 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: existence of Alias tag in Tomcat 3.3?

2002-05-14 Thread Larry Isaacs

For the Alias element to work in Tomcat 3.3.x, it must preceed
all Context elements.  This requirement has to do with how the
XML is processed and keeping this feature simple to implement.
You can find additional details here:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.html#context_addcust


Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Duane Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:15 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: SpinWeb Admin
 Subject: existence of Alias tag in Tomcat 3.3?
 
 
 Tomcat Users,
 
 I was under the impression that there was an Alias tag 
 available within 
 a WebApp that would allow multiple domain names to match to one Host 
 entry.  For example:
 
 webapps
  Host name=nickmain.spinweb.net
   Context path=
 
 docBase=/usr/local/apache/sites/anotherbigidea.com/htdocs
 debug=1
 reloadable=true
   /Context
  Aliasanotherbigidea.com/Alias
  Aliaswww.anotherbigidea.com/Alias
  /Host
 /webapps
 
 In the example above, the httpd.conf would have a ServerName of 
 nickmain.spinweb.net and a ServerAlias of anotherbigidea.com and 
 www.anotherbigidea.com.  Is the Alias tag only part of Tomcat 
 4, or is 
 there a way to do this in Tomcat 3 without duplicating the 
 Host tag?  I 
 appreciate any comments or suggestions on this, as I mistakenly 
 transferred some domains and I'm needing to fix this one 
 pretty quickly.
 
 Duane
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: simple ContextManager question

2002-05-13 Thread Larry Isaacs

I don't think there is an error.  path= has a special meaning,
i.e. this is the default context.  When a request fails
to match any other context, the request is sent to the default
context.

Internally, the default context is assigned the name ROOT.
That name is displayed in the startup messages you see and is
used in other ways, such as the work directory name for the
context.  Consistent with this, auto-deployment of a web application
named ROOT implies it should be the default context, and not served as
/ROOT.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Duane Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:41 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: simple ContextManager question
 
 
 Tomcat users,
 
 I'm running Tomcat 3.3 with multiple virtual hosts and using 
 the handy 
 feature where Tomcat reads the 
 $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-user.xml files for 
 each web app.  Things are working well, but I believe all the web 
 applications are being mapped to the /ROOT webapp, which isn't what I 
 want.  I copied over the examples directory to each user's 
 area so they 
 would have their own playground so to speak.
 
 My reason for thinking this is because of the following output when 
 starting Tomcat:
 
 2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding  
 dezrtfox.spinweb.net:/ROOT
 2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding  
 nickmain.spinweb.net:/ROOT
 2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding  
 cogsense.spinweb.net:/ROOT
 2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding  
 mudgecko.spinweb.net:/ROOT
 2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding  jpinto.spinweb.net:/ROOT
 
 I've looked at the docs, but haven't found the source of my 
 error.  If 
 things work correctly I should expect to see files generated from JSP 
 processing in the $TOMCAT_HOME/work/DOMAIN directory, but I 
 don't.  This 
 leads me to think that Tomcat isn't mapping the context 
 correctly to the 
 directory I've specified.  Just for kicks, here is one of my webapp 
 config files:
 
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
 webapps
 !-- Begin account nickmain --
  Host name=nickmain.spinweb.net
   Context path=
 
 docBase=/usr/local/apache/sites/anotherbigidea.com/htdocs
 debug=1
 reloadable=true
   /Context
  Aliasanotherbigidea.com/Alias
  /Host
 !-- End account nickmain --
 /webapps
 
 Can someone enlighten me on this?  I would be very 
 appreciative and I'll 
 be glad to furnish more details.
 
 Duane
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: simple ContextManager question

2002-05-13 Thread Larry Isaacs

Try setting debug=1 on the SimpleMapper1 ... element in your
server.xml.  This will cause a group of lines to appear in the
Tomcat log for each request.  The first of these lines identifies
the host Tomcat thinks the request is for.  Do you see the
different host names here?

Cheers,
Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: Duane Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:13 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: simple ContextManager question
 
 
 Larry,
 
 Thanks for the additional information.  Upon further reflection, I 
 notice that all JSPs are compiled into the following directory:
 
$TOMCAT_HOME/work/DEFAULT/examples/jsp
 
 The problem is that requests to domain1.com/examples/ and 
 domain2.com/examples/ are treated the same, and I would like 
 Tomcat to 
 use the work directories for each domain, not the DEFAULT.  
 Recall, the 
 purpose is to have a playground where users on the system can fiddle 
 with the examples directory to learn and explore.
 
 I had this working with Tomcat 3.2, but I don't see the configuration 
 analog between the two systems.  Maybe a better way of phrasing my 
 question would be, how do I make sure the /examples is treated on a 
 per-host basis, not system-wide through the default?
 
 Again, the help and input is very appreciated.
 
 Duane
 
 On Monday, May 13, 2002, at 02:03 PM, Larry Isaacs wrote:
 
  I don't think there is an error.  path= has a special meaning,
  i.e. this is the default context.  When a request fails
  to match any other context, the request is sent to the default
  context.
 
  Internally, the default context is assigned the name ROOT.
  That name is displayed in the startup messages you see and is
  used in other ways, such as the work directory name for the
  context.  Consistent with this, auto-deployment of a web application
  named ROOT implies it should be the default context, and 
 not served as
  /ROOT.
 
  Cheers,
  Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Duane Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:41 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: simple ContextManager question
 
 
  Tomcat users,
 
  I'm running Tomcat 3.3 with multiple virtual hosts and using
  the handy
  feature where Tomcat reads the
  $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-user.xml files for
  each web app.  Things are working well, but I believe all the web
  applications are being mapped to the /ROOT webapp, which 
 isn't what I
  want.  I copied over the examples directory to each user's
  area so they
  would have their own playground so to speak.
 
  My reason for thinking this is because of the following output when
  starting Tomcat:
 
  2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding
  dezrtfox.spinweb.net:/ROOT
  2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding
  nickmain.spinweb.net:/ROOT
  2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding
  cogsense.spinweb.net:/ROOT
  2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding
  mudgecko.spinweb.net:/ROOT
  2002-05-13 12:23:16 - ContextManager: Adding  
 jpinto.spinweb.net:/ROOT
 
  I've looked at the docs, but haven't found the source of my
  error.  If
  things work correctly I should expect to see files 
 generated from JSP
  processing in the $TOMCAT_HOME/work/DOMAIN directory, but I
  don't.  This
  leads me to think that Tomcat isn't mapping the context
  correctly to the
  directory I've specified.  Just for kicks, here is one of my webapp
  config files:
 
  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
  webapps
  !-- Begin account nickmain --
   Host name=nickmain.spinweb.net
Context path=
 
  docBase=/usr/local/apache/sites/anotherbigidea.com/htdocs
  debug=1
  reloadable=true
/Context
   Aliasanotherbigidea.com/Alias
   /Host
  !-- End account nickmain --
  /webapps
 
  Can someone enlighten me on this?  I would be very
  appreciative and I'll
  be glad to furnish more details.
 
  Duane
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For
  additional commands,
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:tomcat-user-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk performance optimization

2002-05-10 Thread Larry Isaacs

If error handling, or something else, get into
a recursive loop, it can eat up all available memory
and result in symptoms like this.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: M. Serrano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: mod_jk performance optimization
 
 
 Thanx for your reply, for it really helped.
 I used jk from 3.3 and the previous error which appeard at 
 mod_jk.log is 
 gone. :-)
 But...(there's always a but) another error appears when I 
 request several 
 servlet tasks simultaneously. In mod_jk.log:
 
 [jk_ajp13_worker.c (381)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - write failed
 
 I've also checked tomcat.log and the following error appears:
 
 Ctx( /WebApplication ): Exception in: R( /WebApplication + 
 /servlet/ServletObj + null) - java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
 no stack trace available
 
 After this the system is slower than ever. I tried to restart 
 Tomcat but the 
 system continues to be very...very slow.
 
 I'd appreciate if some clues about this problem could be thrown
 at me :-)
 
 Thanx.
 Serrano.
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: mod_jk performance optimization
 Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
 
 On Thu, 2 May 2002, M. Serrano wrote:
 
   Hi.
  
   I've got installed in my box Linux, Apache 1.3.19, JDK 
 1.3.1 and TC 
 3.3.1
   working with ajp13. The following error appeard in my 
 mod_jk.log after a 
 bit
   of continuous utilisation:
  
   [jk_ajp13_worker.c (203)]: connection_tcp_get_message: Error -
   jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed
   [jk_ajp13_worker.c (621)]: Error reading request
 
 From the line numbers, you may use an older version of jk, 
 try updating
 from CVS head first ( the bug may be already fixed ) ( you 
 can use either
 the 'frozen' jk from 3.3 or j-t-c ).
 
 The error message means from some reasons tomcat didn't sent back any
 content - so you may need to look in tomcat's lots as well.
 
 ( the 'reading request' means the request from tomcat to jk to send a
 chunk of data )
 
 Costin
 
  
   After analysing the server's config files and reading 
 some threads, I
   concluded that the problem might be resolved through a 
 bit of extra
   re-configuration. Although the problem appearence was 
 delayed, it still
   existed.
  
   I wonder if anyone out there could help me with this subject. I'm 
 sending in
   attach some lines of httpd.conf, server.xml and mod_jk.conf
  
   Thanx a lot for your time.
   Serrano.
  
   ##
   ## httpd.conf -- Apache HTTP server configuration file
   ##
  
   #
   # Timeout: The number of seconds before receives and 
 sends time out.
   #
   Timeout 300
  
   #
   # KeepAlive: Whether or not to allow persistent 
 connections (more than
   # one request per connection). Set to Off to deactivate.
   #
   KeepAlive On
  
   #
   # MaxKeepAliveRequests: The maximum number of requests to allow
   # during a persistent connection. Set to 0 to allow an 
 unlimited amount.
   # We recommend you leave this number high, for maximum 
 performance.
   #
   MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
  
   #
   # KeepAliveTimeout: Number of seconds to wait for the 
 next request from 
 the
   # same client on the same connection.
   #
   KeepAliveTimeout 15
  
   #
   # Server-pool size regulation.  Rather than making you 
 guess how many
   # server processes you need, Apache dynamically adapts to 
 the load it
   # sees --- that is, it tries to maintain enough server 
 processes to
   # handle the current load, plus a few spare servers to 
 handle transient
   # load spikes (e.g., multiple simultaneous requests from a single
   # Netscape browser).
   #
   # It does this by periodically checking how many servers 
 are waiting
   # for a request.  If there are fewer than 
 MinSpareServers, it creates
   # a new spare.  If there are more than MaxSpareServers, 
 some of the
   # spares die off.  The default values are probably OK for 
 most sites.
   #
   MinSpareServers 5
   MaxSpareServers 10
  
   #
   # Number of servers to start initially --- should be a reasonable 
 ballpark
   # figure.
   #
   StartServers 8
  
   #
   # Limit on total number of servers running, i.e., limit 
 on the number
   # of clients who can simultaneously connect --- if this 
 limit is ever
   # reached, clients will be LOCKED OUT, so it should NOT 
 BE SET TOO LOW.
   # It is intended mainly as a brake to keep a runaway 
 server from taking
   # the system with it as it spirals down...
   #
   MaxClients 150
  
   #
   # MaxRequestsPerChild: the number of requests each child 
 process is
   # allowed to process before the child dies.  The child 
 will exit so
   # as to avoid problems after prolonged use when Apache 
 (and maybe the
   # libraries it uses) leak memory or other resources.  On 
 most systems, 
 this
   # isn't really needed, but a few (such as Solaris) do 
 have notable leaks
   # in the libraries. 

RE: shutdown.sh doesn't shutdown JVM(more info)

2002-05-07 Thread Larry Isaacs

Tomcat 4.0.3 will wait forever for web applications to
shutdown any non-daemon threads they created.  If a
web application leaves such a thread running, Tomcat won't
shut down.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Leland Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:46 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: shutdown.sh doesn't shutdown JVM(more info)
 
 
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 I am using tomcat4.0.3 with JDK1.4 on Solaris 8.
 
 After I enter shutdown.sh, the JVM for tomcat is still there. 
 After several 
 round shutdown.sh and startup.sh, my Solaris machine has many 
 JVMs running.
 
 If it shutdown web server immediately after I start the web
 server, the JVM goes away. If I login into my applicaiton after
 web server started, then shutdown, the JVM will be still there.
 
 Anyone knows what is the reason ?
 Is this caused by some java servlets ?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Leland
 
 
 
 
 htmlDIVnbsp;/DIV/html
 
 
 _
 Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Classloader question

2002-05-07 Thread Larry Isaacs

The classloader diagram is found at:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.html#configuring_classes

Because Tomcat 3.3.x uses the JDK delagation model for
classloading, classes in the apps classloader take priority
over WEB-INF/classes and WEB-INF/lib.  I don't think your
approach will work because of this.

However, there is an alternate trick that might work if you want
to give it a try.  Instead of placing the shared classes in the
apps class loader, place them somewhere else and include them
in the webapp class loader using the additionalJars attribute of
the LoaderInterceptor11.  See:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.html#LoaderInterceptor11

I believe the additionalJars attribute will take directories as
well as jars.  I also believe the additionalJars will be
searched after WEB-INF/classes, so a different version of a
class in WEB-INF/classes will take priority over classes added
by additionalJars.

Cheers,
Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: tamir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:06 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Classloader question
 
 
 Hi,
 I had many problems with classloaders using tomcat 3.3.1.
 I think you shouldn't be suprised by the LinkageError, cause 
 you actually
 load this class twice, once by the context class loader and 
 second by the
 apps
 class loader.
 What I don't remember is the hirarcy between these two class loaders
 (maybe you can check in the archives, and understand better what's
 happening).
 What I don't understand is why using two different versions 
 of the same
 class.
 Isn't it some kind of troublemaker?
 
 Tamir
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 7:06 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Classloader question
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I have a situation with Tomcat 3.3a where I am trying
 to allow a specific servlet context to load a version
 of a class from within their WEB-INF/classes
 directory, while other contexts on the server use a
 different version of that class that is loaded by the
 apps classloader.
 
 I can currently get the context classloader to
 actually load the correct class, however later on
 during init, I am getting a java.lang.LinkageError
 saying that the specific class that is being loaded
 twice is violating the loader constraints.
 
 Can anyone point me to any resources that would help
 me solve this problem? Any similar experiences or
 ideas would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Mario-
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
 http://health.yahoo.com
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Classloader question

2002-05-07 Thread Larry Isaacs

I haven't actually tested the additionalJars feature with
respect to reloading. It was orignally added with non-changing
jars in mind, jasper.jar specifically.  You may have to also
specify use11Loader=true for jar reloading to work.

I'm not aware of an equivalent feature in Tomcat 4.x.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: tamir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:18 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Classloader question
 
 
 Hi Larry,
 As I understand the additionalJars attribute, it can actually 
 state jars
 outside
 the WEB-INF/lib or WEB-INF/classes that will be reloaded by 
 tomcat when one
 of the jars in changed.
 Is it also relevant for Catalina ?
 (Is there a way to state jars to be reloaded there too ?)
 
 Tamir
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:18 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Classloader question
 
 
 The classloader diagram is found at:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.htm
 l#configuring_
 classes
 
 Because Tomcat 3.3.x uses the JDK delagation model for
 classloading, classes in the apps classloader take priority
 over WEB-INF/classes and WEB-INF/lib.  I don't think your
 approach will work because of this.
 
 However, there is an alternate trick that might work if you want
 to give it a try.  Instead of placing the shared classes in the
 apps class loader, place them somewhere else and include them
 in the webapp class loader using the additionalJars attribute of
 the LoaderInterceptor11.  See:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.htm
 l#LoaderInterc
 eptor11
 
 I believe the additionalJars attribute will take directories as
 well as jars.  I also believe the additionalJars will be
 searched after WEB-INF/classes, so a different version of a
 class in WEB-INF/classes will take priority over classes added
 by additionalJars.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: tamir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:06 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Classloader question
  
  
  Hi,
  I had many problems with classloaders using tomcat 3.3.1.
  I think you shouldn't be suprised by the LinkageError, cause 
  you actually
  load this class twice, once by the context class loader and 
  second by the
  apps
  class loader.
  What I don't remember is the hirarcy between these two class loaders
  (maybe you can check in the archives, and understand better what's
  happening).
  What I don't understand is why using two different versions 
  of the same
  class.
  Isn't it some kind of troublemaker?
  
  Tamir
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 7:06 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Classloader question
  
  
  Hello,
  
  I have a situation with Tomcat 3.3a where I am trying
  to allow a specific servlet context to load a version
  of a class from within their WEB-INF/classes
  directory, while other contexts on the server use a
  different version of that class that is loaded by the
  apps classloader.
  
  I can currently get the context classloader to
  actually load the correct class, however later on
  during init, I am getting a java.lang.LinkageError
  saying that the specific class that is being loaded
  twice is violating the loader constraints.
  
  Can anyone point me to any resources that would help
  me solve this problem? Any similar experiences or
  ideas would be greatly appreciated.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Mario-
  
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
  http://health.yahoo.com
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
  mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 
  additional commands, 
  e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Missing jni_md.h file in jni.h???

2002-05-03 Thread Larry Isaacs

The jni_md.h file is found in a system dependently named
subdirectory of your JDK/include directory.  If you
are using a build-xxx.sh script, I think this should be
addressed.  If you are using the jk/native/build.xml
to perform the build, be aware this extra include
currently isn't handled successfully for some unix
platforms in some of the targets.  You can add:

include name=${java.home}/../include/??? /

where you see similar lines for other operating systems.

Also, note that even though you will find the following
line in the jni target, nothing yet sets the linux
(or hpux as far as I could tell) property:

   include name=${java.home}/../include/linux if=linux /

You could add lines like this for your operating system
and manually define the os property needed.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: David A. Bartmess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:46 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Missing jni_md.h file in jni.h???
 
 
 I'm trying to compile the mod_jk.so file, and have a problem with an
 include file. The error is below:
 
 In file included from
 /usr/installs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_jn
 i_worker.c:69:
 /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0/include/jni.h:27:20: jni_md.h: No such file or
 directory
 
 I've looked everywhere on my system, and it's not here... Is this a
 java.Sun.Com bug? Or am I missing something somewhere?
 
 TIA
 
 David A. Bartmess IT Samaritans
 Helping Non-Profits Achieve Technical Excellence Software 
 Configuration
 Manager / Sr. Software Developer eDingo.net
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: how do I redirect the generated files?

2002-05-02 Thread Larry Isaacs

mod_jk.conf-auto suggests you are using a version of Tomcat 3.2.x.
The generated files are not configurable in in 3.2.x.  These are
configurable in Tomcat 3.3.x, with slightly different defaults.
The generated files for 3.3.x all default to being written to the
conf/auto directory instead of into conf.  AFAIK, your choice
is to upgrade to 3.3.x or patch 3.2.x source and build your own
Tomcat 3.2.x.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: how do I redirect the generated files?
 
 
 We're trying to redirect the automatically generated files like
 tomcat-apache.conf, obj.conf-auto, mod_jk.conf-auto, ... because we
 don't have write permission to the /usr/local/tomcat/conf 
 directory. We
 have successfully redirected the log files to /var/log by editing the
 server.xml file. Can we direct all generated files to a 
 directory other
 than /usr/local/tomcat/conf?
 
 Thanks,
 Mike
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

For http://foo.bar.com/, who serves the directory
listing?  If IIS is serving the listing, making
changes on the Tomcat side isn't going to alter this
behavior.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:41 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 Bill,
 
 Still not working.
 My welcome file list is this
 
 welcome-file-list
   welcome-file
 index.xml
   /welcome-file
 /welcome-file-list
 
 And you right, it was in web.xml, but after I made the changes, and
 re-started Tomcat, I still get the directory listing.
 If you have any other thoughts, please let me know.
 
 Thanks
 Anthony
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Barnhill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:00 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 I think this can be done by setting the welcome page to be 
 index.xml. I
 think this is in web.xml, but I may have the xml file wrong. Do a find
 on text welcome in the .xml files under tomcat and you should find it.
 
 HTH,
 Bill Barnhill
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:46 AM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 Im using Cocoon 1.8.2 and Tomcat 3.2.4. IIS 5.0 as my 
 Webserver. I have
 Tomcat processing my Cocoon xml, and IIS doing all of the 
 static pages.
 
 My problem is this.
 
 If I go to http://foo.bar.com/index.xml it works fine, but if I go to
 http://foo.bar.com/ it gives me a directory listing of what is in that
 directory. Id like for it to default to the index.xml file.
 
 Can this be done??
 
 Thanks
 Anthony Diodato
 
 
 Anthony Diodato
 Webmaster - IT
 Prophet 21, Inc.
 19 West College Avenue
 Yardley, PA 19067
 1-800-776-7438, ext. 4600
 Fax: 215-321-8014 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.p21.com/
 Prophet 21 -- Powering the Distribution Industry for the Digital Age 
 
 For the latest press releases from Prophet 21 --
 http://www.p21.com/press/press.html 
 * 2/12/2001 - Trading Partner Connect Offers
 Enterprise-to-Enterprise
 (E2E) Commerce 
 * 2/9/2001 -- Prophet 21 CommerceCenter 8.0 is Now Available
 * 2/9/2001 -- Prophet 21 Upgrades and Enhances Prophet 21 Acclaim
 For the latest articles on Prophet 21
 http://www.manufacturing.net/magazine/id/archives/2001/ind010.
 02/techupd
 ate.
 htm 
 http://www.manufacturing.net/magazine/id/develop/techmain01.1.htm 
 http://www.manufacturing.net/magazine/id/archives/2000/ind1201
 /news.htm
 
 
 
 
 Visit our website at http://www.p21.com/visit 
 The information in this e-mail is confidential and may contain legally
 privileged information.  It is intended solely for the person 
 or entity
 to which it is addressed.  Access to this e-mail by anyone else is
 unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
 copying, distribution, action taken, or action omitted to be taken in
 reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you 
 received this
 e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
 material from
 any computer. 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Visit our website at http://www.p21.com/visit 
 The information in this e-mail is confidential and may contain legally
 privileged information.  It is intended solely for the person 
 or entity to
 which it is addressed.  Access to this e-mail by anyone else is
 unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
 copying, distribution, action taken, or action omitted to be taken in
 reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you 
 received this
 e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
 material from any
 computer. 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

Does the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ get mapped to
Tomcat?  If not, IIS still serves the directory listing.
If the listing doesn't identify Tomcat, then Tomcat
isn't generating the listing.  The statement that
IIS doing all of the static pages suggests that IIS
is likely to be doing the listings too.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:51 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 IIS serves that page, but I guess I should've been more clear.
 
 What Im really looking for is this.
 http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ this is the page that Id like to 
 default to the
 index.xml file
 The Context /cocoon is served by Tomcat, and this is exactly where my
 problem lies.
 
 Thanks
 Anthony
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:45 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 For http://foo.bar.com/, who serves the directory
 listing?  If IIS is serving the listing, making
 changes on the Tomcat side isn't going to alter this
 behavior.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:41 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  Bill,
  
  Still not working.
  My welcome file list is this
  
  welcome-file-list
  welcome-file
  index.xml
/welcome-file
  /welcome-file-list
  
  And you right, it was in web.xml, but after I made the changes, and
  re-started Tomcat, I still get the directory listing.
  If you have any other thoughts, please let me know.
  
  Thanks
  Anthony
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill Barnhill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:00 PM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  I think this can be done by setting the welcome page to be 
  index.xml. I
  think this is in web.xml, but I may have the xml file 
 wrong. Do a find
  on text welcome in the .xml files under tomcat and you 
 should find it.
  
  HTH,
  Bill Barnhill
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:46 AM
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  Subject: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  Im using Cocoon 1.8.2 and Tomcat 3.2.4. IIS 5.0 as my 
  Webserver. I have
  Tomcat processing my Cocoon xml, and IIS doing all of the 
  static pages.
  
  My problem is this.
  
  If I go to http://foo.bar.com/index.xml it works fine, but 
 if I go to
  http://foo.bar.com/ it gives me a directory listing of what 
 is in that
  directory. Id like for it to default to the index.xml file.
  
  Can this be done??
  
  Thanks
  Anthony Diodato
  
  
  Anthony Diodato
  Webmaster - IT
  Prophet 21, Inc.
  19 West College Avenue
  Yardley, PA 19067
  1-800-776-7438, ext. 4600
  Fax: 215-321-8014 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.p21.com/
  Prophet 21 -- Powering the Distribution Industry for the 
 Digital Age 
  
  For the latest press releases from Prophet 21 --
  http://www.p21.com/press/press.html 
  *   2/12/2001 - Trading Partner Connect Offers
  Enterprise-to-Enterprise
  (E2E) Commerce 
  *   2/9/2001 -- Prophet 21 CommerceCenter 8.0 is Now Available
  *   2/9/2001 -- Prophet 21 Upgrades and Enhances Prophet 21 Acclaim
  For the latest articles on Prophet 21
  http://www.manufacturing.net/magazine/id/archives/2001/ind010.
  02/techupd
  ate.
  htm 
  http://www.manufacturing.net/magazine/id/develop/techmain01.1.htm 
  http://www.manufacturing.net/magazine/id/archives/2000/ind1201
  /news.htm
  
  
  
  
  Visit our website at http://www.p21.com/visit 
  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may 
 contain legally
  privileged information.  It is intended solely for the person 
  or entity
  to which it is addressed.  Access to this e-mail by anyone else is
  unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
  copying, distribution, action taken, or action omitted to 
 be taken in
  reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you 
  received this
  e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
  material from
  any computer. 
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe:   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Troubles with the list: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe:   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Troubles with the list: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  Visit our website at http://www.p21.com/visit 
  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may 
 contain legally
  privileged information.  It is intended solely for the person 
  or entity to
  which it is addressed.  Access to this e-mail by anyone else is
  unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure

RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

If Tomcat is serving the listing, you should see Tomcat named
in the footer of the displayed page.  I forget the exact text
of the string.  If you don't see mentioned at the bottom of
the page, then IIS is serving the listing.

If you want the welcome files specified in the web.xml to make
a difference, then the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ will
have to be forwarded to Tomcat.  Which requests are forwarded is
controlled by the uriworkermap.properties file.  It is here
that you would add the appropriate mapping.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:11 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 Larry,
 
 How can I be sure. I know Tomcat is doing something with that 
 directory,
 because all of the xml pages are using Java, and I know IIS 
 cant serve them
 without some help.
 
 Inside of my server.xml file Im doing this.
 Context path=/cocoon 
  docBase=webapps/cocoon 
  debug=0 
  reloadable=true  
 /Context
 I thought this mapped the /cocoon context to Tomcat..
 Now Im really confused.
 
 The Home Directory for IIS is pointing to 
 c:\jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4\webapps
 Should this be changed too??
 
 Thanks
 Tony
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:04 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 Does the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ get mapped to
 Tomcat?  If not, IIS still serves the directory listing.
 If the listing doesn't identify Tomcat, then Tomcat
 isn't generating the listing.  The statement that
 IIS doing all of the static pages suggests that IIS
 is likely to be doing the listings too.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:51 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  IIS serves that page, but I guess I should've been more clear.
  
  What Im really looking for is this.
  http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ this is the page that Id like to 
  default to the
  index.xml file
  The Context /cocoon is served by Tomcat, and this is 
 exactly where my
  problem lies.
  
  Thanks
  Anthony
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:45 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  For http://foo.bar.com/, who serves the directory
  listing?  If IIS is serving the listing, making
  changes on the Tomcat side isn't going to alter this
  behavior.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:41 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   Bill,
   
   Still not working.
   My welcome file list is this
   
   welcome-file-list
 welcome-file
   index.xml
 /welcome-file
   /welcome-file-list
   
   And you right, it was in web.xml, but after I made the 
 changes, and
   re-started Tomcat, I still get the directory listing.
   If you have any other thoughts, please let me know.
   
   Thanks
   Anthony
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill Barnhill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:00 PM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   I think this can be done by setting the welcome page to be 
   index.xml. I
   think this is in web.xml, but I may have the xml file 
  wrong. Do a find
   on text welcome in the .xml files under tomcat and you 
  should find it.
   
   HTH,
   Bill Barnhill
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:46 AM
   To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
   Subject: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   Im using Cocoon 1.8.2 and Tomcat 3.2.4. IIS 5.0 as my 
   Webserver. I have
   Tomcat processing my Cocoon xml, and IIS doing all of the 
   static pages.
   
   My problem is this.
   
   If I go to http://foo.bar.com/index.xml it works fine, but 
  if I go to
   http://foo.bar.com/ it gives me a directory listing of what 
  is in that
   directory. Id like for it to default to the index.xml file.
   
   Can this be done??
   
   Thanks
   Anthony Diodato
   
   
   Anthony Diodato
   Webmaster - IT
   Prophet 21, Inc.
   19 West College Avenue
   Yardley, PA 19067
   1-800-776-7438, ext. 4600
   Fax: 215-321-8014 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.p21.com/
   Prophet 21 -- Powering the Distribution Industry for the 
  Digital Age 
   
   For the latest press releases from Prophet 21 --
   http://www.p21.com/press/press.html 
   * 2/12/2001 - Trading Partner Connect Offers
   Enterprise-to-Enterprise
   (E2E) Commerce 
   * 2/9/2001 -- Prophet 21 CommerceCenter 8.0 is Now Available
   * 2

RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

At this point, try changing to debug=1 on the StaticInterceptor
in server.xml.  That should show in the log, whether it is finding
the welcome file.  You will be looking for Dir handler if the
file is not found, or Redirect ... if it is.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 When I get the directory listing, the bottom of my page says 
 Tomcat Web
 Server v3.2.4
 
 This is what I have in my uriworkermap.properties
 default.worker=ajp12
 
 /cocoon=$(default.worker)
 /cocoon/*=$(default.worker)
 /cocoon/*.xml=$(default.worker)
 
 Still getting the same results.
 
 I thank for all your help so far, and I think Im close, but 
 something isn't
 clicking somewhere.
 Any other thoughts
 
 Thanks
 Anthony
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:28 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 If Tomcat is serving the listing, you should see Tomcat named
 in the footer of the displayed page.  I forget the exact text
 of the string.  If you don't see mentioned at the bottom of
 the page, then IIS is serving the listing.
 
 If you want the welcome files specified in the web.xml to make
 a difference, then the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ will
 have to be forwarded to Tomcat.  Which requests are forwarded is
 controlled by the uriworkermap.properties file.  It is here
 that you would add the appropriate mapping.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:11 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  Larry,
  
  How can I be sure. I know Tomcat is doing something with that 
  directory,
  because all of the xml pages are using Java, and I know IIS 
  cant serve them
  without some help.
  
  Inside of my server.xml file Im doing this.
  Context path=/cocoon 
   docBase=webapps/cocoon 
   debug=0 
   reloadable=true  
  /Context
  I thought this mapped the /cocoon context to Tomcat..
  Now Im really confused.
  
  The Home Directory for IIS is pointing to 
  c:\jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4\webapps
  Should this be changed too??
  
  Thanks
  Tony
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:04 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  Does the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ get mapped to
  Tomcat?  If not, IIS still serves the directory listing.
  If the listing doesn't identify Tomcat, then Tomcat
  isn't generating the listing.  The statement that
  IIS doing all of the static pages suggests that IIS
  is likely to be doing the listings too.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:51 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   IIS serves that page, but I guess I should've been more clear.
   
   What Im really looking for is this.
   http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ this is the page that Id like to 
   default to the
   index.xml file
   The Context /cocoon is served by Tomcat, and this is 
  exactly where my
   problem lies.
   
   Thanks
   Anthony
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:45 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   For http://foo.bar.com/, who serves the directory
   listing?  If IIS is serving the listing, making
   changes on the Tomcat side isn't going to alter this
   behavior.
   
   Cheers,
   Larry
   
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:41 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question


Bill,

Still not working.
My welcome file list is this

welcome-file-list
welcome-file
index.xml
  /welcome-file
/welcome-file-list

And you right, it was in web.xml, but after I made the 
  changes, and
re-started Tomcat, I still get the directory listing.
If you have any other thoughts, please let me know.

Thanks
Anthony

-Original Message-
From: Bill Barnhill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:00 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question


I think this can be done by setting the welcome page to be 
index.xml. I
think this is in web.xml, but I may have the xml file 
   wrong. Do a find
on text welcome in the .xml files under tomcat and you 
   should find it.

HTH,
Bill Barnhill

RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

The output would go to the Tomcat log, which defaults to outputing
to the console.  If it gets lost there, add a path for the tc_log
in server.xml.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:10 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 I've set the StaticInterceptor to
 
 RequestInterceptor
   classname=org.apache.tomcat.request.StaticInterceptor 
   debug=1
   suppress=false/
 
 Now where is the log file that Im looking for??
 I only have 3 log files in the entire jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4 directory
 iis_redirect.log
 jasper.log
 servlet.log
 
 Thanks
 Tony
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:01 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 At this point, try changing to debug=1 on the StaticInterceptor
 in server.xml.  That should show in the log, whether it is finding
 the welcome file.  You will be looking for Dir handler if the
 file is not found, or Redirect ... if it is.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  When I get the directory listing, the bottom of my page says 
  Tomcat Web
  Server v3.2.4
  
  This is what I have in my uriworkermap.properties
  default.worker=ajp12
  
  /cocoon=$(default.worker)
  /cocoon/*=$(default.worker)
  /cocoon/*.xml=$(default.worker)
  
  Still getting the same results.
  
  I thank for all your help so far, and I think Im close, but 
  something isn't
  clicking somewhere.
  Any other thoughts
  
  Thanks
  Anthony
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:28 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  If Tomcat is serving the listing, you should see Tomcat named
  in the footer of the displayed page.  I forget the exact text
  of the string.  If you don't see mentioned at the bottom of
  the page, then IIS is serving the listing.
  
  If you want the welcome files specified in the web.xml to make
  a difference, then the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ will
  have to be forwarded to Tomcat.  Which requests are forwarded is
  controlled by the uriworkermap.properties file.  It is here
  that you would add the appropriate mapping.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:11 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   Larry,
   
   How can I be sure. I know Tomcat is doing something with that 
   directory,
   because all of the xml pages are using Java, and I know IIS 
   cant serve them
   without some help.
   
   Inside of my server.xml file Im doing this.
   Context path=/cocoon 
docBase=webapps/cocoon 
debug=0 
reloadable=true  
   /Context
   I thought this mapped the /cocoon context to Tomcat..
   Now Im really confused.
   
   The Home Directory for IIS is pointing to 
   c:\jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4\webapps
   Should this be changed too??
   
   Thanks
   Tony
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:04 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   Does the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ get mapped to
   Tomcat?  If not, IIS still serves the directory listing.
   If the listing doesn't identify Tomcat, then Tomcat
   isn't generating the listing.  The statement that
   IIS doing all of the static pages suggests that IIS
   is likely to be doing the listings too.
   
   Cheers,
   Larry
   
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:51 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question


IIS serves that page, but I guess I should've been more clear.

What Im really looking for is this.
http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ this is the page that Id like to 
default to the
index.xml file
The Context /cocoon is served by Tomcat, and this is 
   exactly where my
problem lies.

Thanks
Anthony

-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:45 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question


For http://foo.bar.com/, who serves the directory
listing?  If IIS is serving the listing, making
changes on the Tomcat side isn't going to alter this
behavior.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent

RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

After inspecting the source for StaticInterceptor, there
is a bug that causes the debug level always be reset to 0.
That would explain the lack of additional output.

It is this interceptor that decides whether to redirect to
a found welcome file or display a directory lists when the
request refers to a directory.  It is not clear why this
interceptor is not picking up your welcome file.

I have confirmed that this bug, among many others, is not
present in Tomcat 3.3 and later.  If you can give 3.3.1
a try, you would also benefit in that Tomcat 3.3 will
validate the web.xml.  If the welcome file is being
ignored due to some syntax error in web.xml, you would find
out about it.  The alternative is to build your own
Tomcat 3.2.x from source, removing the debug=0 in the
contextInit() method of StaticInterceptor.

Cheers,
Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:37 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 OK, Ive set up the error log to go to tomcat.log.
 
 This is what I have in my log after I try to access
 http://foo.bar.com/cocoon
 
 Nothing seems to change in here after I access 
 http://foo.bar.com/cocoon or
 http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/index.xml
 
 I go back and forth between pages, refreshing and still 
 nothing seems to
 appear 
 
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /examples )
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - Ctx( /cocoon ): Set debug to 1
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /cocoon )
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx(  )
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /admin )
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( 
 /index.html )
 2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /test )
 2002-05-01 11:22:58 - Ctx( /cocoon ): XmlReader - init  /cocoon
 webapps/cocoon
 2002-05-01 11:22:58 - Ctx( /cocoon ): Reading
 C:\jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4\webapps\cocoon\WEB-INF\web.xml
 2002-05-01 11:22:58 - Ctx( /cocoon ): Loading -2147483646 jsp
 2002-05-01 11:22:59 - PoolTcpConnector: Starting 
 HttpConnectionHandler on
 8080
 2002-05-01 11:22:59 - PoolTcpConnector: Starting 
 Ajp12ConnectionHandler on
 8007
 
 THanks
 Tony
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:18 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 The output would go to the Tomcat log, which defaults to outputing
 to the console.  If it gets lost there, add a path for the tc_log
 in server.xml.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:10 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  I've set the StaticInterceptor to
  
  RequestInterceptor
  classname=org.apache.tomcat.request.StaticInterceptor 
  debug=1
  suppress=false/
  
  Now where is the log file that Im looking for??
  I only have 3 log files in the entire jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4 directory
  iis_redirect.log
  jasper.log
  servlet.log
  
  Thanks
  Tony
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:01 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  At this point, try changing to debug=1 on the StaticInterceptor
  in server.xml.  That should show in the log, whether it is finding
  the welcome file.  You will be looking for Dir handler if the
  file is not found, or Redirect ... if it is.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   When I get the directory listing, the bottom of my page says 
   Tomcat Web
   Server v3.2.4
   
   This is what I have in my uriworkermap.properties
   default.worker=ajp12
   
   /cocoon=$(default.worker)
   /cocoon/*=$(default.worker)
   /cocoon/*.xml=$(default.worker)
   
   Still getting the same results.
   
   I thank for all your help so far, and I think Im close, but 
   something isn't
   clicking somewhere.
   Any other thoughts
   
   Thanks
   Anthony
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:28 AM
   To: 'Tomcat Users List'
   Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
   
   
   If Tomcat is serving the listing, you should see Tomcat named
   in the footer of the displayed page.  I forget the exact text
   of the string.  If you don't see mentioned at the bottom of
   the page, then IIS is serving the listing.
   
   If you want the welcome files specified in the web.xml to make
   a difference, then the request http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/ will
   have to be forwarded to Tomcat.  Which requests are forwarded is
   controlled by the uriworkermap.properties file.  It is here

RE: Tomcat Cocoon Question

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Isaacs

I would recommend giving it a try.  The 3.3 release notes
covers the most important new features and changes.
Primarily, check out the 2. INSTALLING AND RUNNING TOMCAT
and 5. NEW FEATURES AND CHANGES IN THIS RELEASE in:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/readme

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:53 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 How hard is it to upgrade from Tomcat 3.2.4 to 3.3.1
 
 And is there any side affects that will make problems with 
 Cocoon 1.8.2, and
 IIS 5.0
 
 Thanks
 Anthony
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:57 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
 
 
 After inspecting the source for StaticInterceptor, there
 is a bug that causes the debug level always be reset to 0.
 That would explain the lack of additional output.
 
 It is this interceptor that decides whether to redirect to
 a found welcome file or display a directory lists when the
 request refers to a directory.  It is not clear why this
 interceptor is not picking up your welcome file.
 
 I have confirmed that this bug, among many others, is not
 present in Tomcat 3.3 and later.  If you can give 3.3.1
 a try, you would also benefit in that Tomcat 3.3 will
 validate the web.xml.  If the welcome file is being
 ignored due to some syntax error in web.xml, you would find
 out about it.  The alternative is to build your own
 Tomcat 3.2.x from source, removing the debug=0 in the
 contextInit() method of StaticInterceptor.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Anthony Diodato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:37 AM
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: RE: Tomcat  Cocoon Question
  
  
  OK, Ive set up the error log to go to tomcat.log.
  
  This is what I have in my log after I try to access
  http://foo.bar.com/cocoon
  
  Nothing seems to change in here after I access 
  http://foo.bar.com/cocoon or
  http://foo.bar.com/cocoon/index.xml
  
  I go back and forth between pages, refreshing and still 
  nothing seems to
  appear 
  
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( 
 /examples )
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - Ctx( /cocoon ): Set debug to 1
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /cocoon )
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx(  )
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /admin )
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( 
  /index.html )
  2002-05-01 11:22:51 - ContextManager: Adding context Ctx( /test )
  2002-05-01 11:22:58 - Ctx( /cocoon ): XmlReader - init  /cocoon
  webapps/cocoon
  2002-05-01 11:22:58 - Ctx( /cocoon ): Reading
  C:\jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4\webapps\cocoon\WEB-INF\web.xml
  2002-05-01 11:22:58 - Ctx( /cocoon ): Loading -2147483646 jsp
  2002-05-01 11:22:59 - PoolTcpConnector: Starting 
  HttpConnectionHandler on
  8080
  2002-05-01 11:22:59 - PoolTcpConnector: Starting 
  Ajp12ConnectionHandler on
  8007
  
  THanks
  Tony
  
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: How to change the jsp file expansion rules

2002-04-30 Thread Larry Isaacs

Only Tomcat 3.2.x and earlier use this form of name mangling
and file placement.  Both Tomcat 3.3.x and Tomcat 4.x place
files in the appropriate directory with a name that is not
lengthened much by mangling.  You will need to upgrade to get
this new behavior.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:33 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: How to change the jsp file expansion rules
 
 
 I have hit the file name too long barrier. The problem isn't 
 the filename
 per say, but the way tomcat is creating the .java and .class 
 names from the
 jsp. When expanding the jsp, it is including the directory 
 structure in the
 file name. It also creates the directory structure, but 
 doesn't put any
 files in it.
 
 Example:
 jsp/one/two/three/filename.jsp becomes
 
 _0002fjsp_0002fone_0002ftwo_0002fthree_0002ffilename_0002ejspf
 ilename.class
 _0002fjsp_0002fone_0002ftwo_0002fthree_0002ffilename_0002ejspf
 ilename_jsp_0.
 java
 
 but the subdirectory three under jsp/one/two is empty.
 
 Is there any way to change this behavior so that it will place
 'filename_0002ejspfilename.class' et al in the proper directory?
 
 Thanks, Ed.
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: MIME types in 3.3

2002-04-25 Thread Larry Isaacs

Hi Keith,

The only alternative I'm aware of, other than cut and paste,
is to build your own Tomcat 3.3.x and re-enable the
the readDefaultWebXml() call in the contextInit() method
of WebXmlReader.java.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Keith Wannamaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: MIME types in 3.3
 
 
 Since the default web.xml has been done away with,
 what is the best way to set up thirty or forty
 default mime type mappings for all webapps, without
 repeating this information in every webapps' web.xml?
 
 Keith
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: multiple Tomcat-instances and a confused servlet...

2002-04-25 Thread Larry Isaacs

In server.xml, ContextInterceptor className=...AutoSetup
will automatically add subdirectories of TOMCAT_HOME/webapps
as contexts, using the subdirectory name as the context
name.  Context declarations in server.xml can override the
settings for the auto-added contexts.  If you don't want
a web application automatically served, move it outside of
the TOMCAT_HOME/webapps or remove the interceptor so no
contexts are automatically served.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:06 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: multiple Tomcat-instances and a confused servlet...
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm using multiple instances of Tomcat 3.2.4. The problem is, 
 that I can
 access servlets of one instance even if the servlets is in the
 webapps-directory of another instance. This is very confusing 
 during the
 development of the servlet, because it still lives in the 
 other instances
 although I shut down the right instance.
 
 The main instance of Tomcat lsitens on Port 8087:
 http://www.mydomain.com:8087/Community/Poll
 The servlet Poll ist configured to run this instance:
 server.xml:
 Context path=/Community
  docBase=webapps/Community
  crossContext=false
  debug=0
  reloadable=true 
 /Context
 
 web.xml:
servlet-mapping
 servlet-name
 Poll
 /servlet-name
 url-pattern
 /Poll
 /url-pattern
 /servlet-mapping
 
 and it is loaded correct during the startup of this TC-instance:
 tomcat.log:
 2002-04-25 11:25:04 - Ctx( /Community ): Mapping with 
 unregistered servlet
 Poll
 
 start-script of this instance:
 TOMCATLOG=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4/logs/tomcat_start.log
 TOMCATLOG2=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4/logs/tomcat_err.log
 export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.3.1_02
 export TOMCAT_HOME=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4
 cd $TOMCAT_HOME
 /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4/bin/startup.sh -f
 /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4/conf/server.xml $TOMCATLOG 
 2$TOMCATLOG2
 
 so far, so good.
 
 BUT:
 I can access this servlet with an other TC-instance, which 
 listens on Port
 9015: http://www.mydomain.com:9015/Community/Poll
 
 in this instance, there is NO entry in server.xml which points on the
 servlet Poll. Even the directory webapps/Community does 
 not exist in
 this instance!
 ...and it is loaded during the startup :((
 2002-04-25 11:24:16 - Ctx( /Community ): Mapping with 
 unregistered servlet
 Poll
 
 start-script of this instance, which uses the same binaries 
 but an other
 server.xml:
 TOMCATLOG=/usr/local/tc-324-i2125/logs/i2125tomcat_start.log
 TOMCATLOG2=/usr/local/tc-324-i2125/logs/i2125tomcat_err.log
 export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.3.1_02
 export TOMCAT_HOME=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4
 /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.4/bin/startup.sh -f
 /usr/local/tc-324-i2125/conf/server.xml $TOMCATLOG 2$TOMCATLOG2
 
 Any ideas how I can stop this behaviour ?
 
 Many thanks !
 Kay
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Class jsppages.MoniBean not found. SORTED MYSELF CHEERS ALL

2002-04-25 Thread Larry Isaacs

I don't think moving all the pages to the base directory
of your web application is the best solution.  The
important point about:

jsp:useBean id=formHandler scope=request class=MoniBean/

is that MoniBean is declared to be in the default package,
i.e. it has no package. If you don't declare this fact to the
JSP page, the JSP compiler will assume MoniBean is in the
*same* package as the JSP's java file.

In Tomcat 3.x, the package that JSP's are placed in is equal
to the subdirectory structure from the base of the web
application.  Thus a JSP page in the jsppages subdirectory
will be placed in the jsppages package.  Hence the error
stating that Class jsppages.MoniBean not found.  Note the
package name on the class.  Tomcat 3.x's behavior also means
that JSP pages in the base directory of your web application
are placed in the default package, causing MoniBean to become
visible by luck.  There is no guarantee about what package
any JSP will be placed in, so you can't count on this.  In
fact, it is guaranteed to not work with Tomcat 4.x.

The best solution is to declare that MoniBean is in the
default package rather than allowing the JSP compiler
to assume it is in the same package as the JSP.  To to
this, add:

%@ page import=MoniBean %

This will allow your JSP page to work in any directory and
any servlet container, including Tomcat 4.x.

Cheers,
Larry



 -Original Message-
 From: chuck amadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:22 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List; taglibs-user-help
 Subject: Re: Class jsppages.MoniBean not found. SORTED MYSELF 
 CHEERS ALL
 
 
 chuck amadi wrote:
 
 
 *Hi there any reason for this as i i haven't got 
 jsppages in
 my classes path or as a package in my MoniBea*
 
 
 *jsp:useBean id=formHandler scope=request
 class=MoniBean/**
 **jsp:setProperty name=formHandler property=*/*
 *Error: 500*
 
 
 *Location: /volapp/jsppages/registerProcess.jsp*
 
 
 *Internal Servlet Error:*
 
  org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile 
  
 /home/chucka/tomcat/work/DEFAULT/volapp/jsppages/registerProce
 ss_1.java:72: 
  Class jsppages.MoniBean not found.
 MoniBean formHandler = null;
 ^
  
 /home/chucka/tomcat/work/DEFAULT/volapp/jsppages/registerProce
 ss_1.java:75: 
  Class jsppages.MoniBean not found.
 formHandler= (MoniBean)
   ^
  
 /home/chucka/tomcat/work/DEFAULT/volapp/jsppages/registerProce
 ss_1.java:80: 
  Class jsppages.MoniBean not found.
   formHandler = (MoniBean) 
  java.beans.Beans.instantiate(this.getClass().getClassLoader(), 
  MoniBean);
  ^
  3 errors
 
  at org.apache.tomcat.facade.JasperLiaison.javac(Unknown Source)
  at 
 org.apache.tomcat.facade.JasperLiaison.processJspFile(Unknown 
  Source)
  at 
 org.apache.tomcat.facade.JspInterceptor.requestMap(Unknown Source)
  at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.processRequest(Unknown 
  Source)
  at 
 org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.internalService(Unknown 
  Source)
  at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.service(Unknown Source)
  at 
  
 org.apache.tomcat.modules.server.Http10Interceptor.processConn
 ection(Unknown 
  Source)
  at 
 org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(Unknown Source)
  at 
  
 org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(Unknown 
  Source)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:498)
 
  Please help as i have had to to do a reinstall of tomcat 3.3a as i 
  couldn't sort the behaviour issue as i kept
  getting cannot creat Bean.So thid is better than the 
 previous errors.
 
  Cheers Chuck Amadi
  Systems Programmer
 
 Gathered all my jsp's and htm and placed them in the same 
 level as my webapp
 Cheers Chuck Amadi
 
 Systems Programmer
 Rhaglennydd Systemau
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Q] Using IBM JDK with tomcat 3.3

2002-04-25 Thread Larry Isaacs

Tomcat 3.3.x doesn't get a lot of testing against any 1.1.8
JDK.  What little testing it does get is done with Sun's
JDK 1.1.8.  This testing is done with a Tomcat that is built
with Sun's JDK 1.1.8.  The binary distribution is built
with Sun's JDK 1.3.1.  You might try building Tomcat 3.3 with
IBM's JDK and see if this succeeds and if so, does it still
run any better than the binary distribution you are using now.

Cheers,
Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: Sudhakar Chandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:37 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Q] Using IBM JDK with tomcat 3.3
 
 
 Hi,
 
 Here is my setup:
 
 tomcat: 
 3.3a
 mod_jk: 
 3.3a
 Sun JDK: 1.1.8v1
 IBM JDK: 1.1.8
 OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing
 
 When I use Sun's JDK, the ajp12 and ajp13 workers start accepting 
 connections.  Here are relevant bits from the log files:
 
 Jdk11Compat: Installing jar protocol handler
 2002-04-25 09:17:17 - SessionIdGenerator: Opening /dev/urandom
 2002-04-25 09:17:24 - ServerXmlReader: 
 Config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/server.xml
 2002-04-25 09:17:24 - PathSetter: home=/usr/share/tomcat
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextXmlReader: Context 
 config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-examples.xml
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - Ctx(/jsp) : Setting debug to 1
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - AutoWebApp: Auto-Adding DEFAULT:/
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - AutoWebApp: Loaded from config: 
 DEFAULT:/examples
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Tomcat configured and 
 in stable state
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/examples
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/jsp
 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/ROOT
 
 thaths@daemon:[51] ~ $ telnet localhost 8007
 Trying 127.0.0.1...
 Connected to localhost.
 Escape character is '^]'.
 Connection closed by foreign host.
 thaths@daemon:[52] ~ $ telnet localhost 8009
 Trying 127.0.0.1...
 Connected to localhost.
 Escape character is '^]'.
 Connection closed by foreign host.
 
 However, when I start tomcat using IBM's JDK, ajp12 and ajp13 
 workers 
 do not accept connections.  They don't even start up as far as I can 
 tell.  Here are relevant bits from the log files:
 
 Jdk11Compat: Installing jar protocol handler
 2002-04-25 09:21:52 - SessionIdGenerator: Opening /dev/urandom
 2002-04-25 09:22:02 - ServerXmlReader: 
 Config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/server.xml
 2002-04-25 09:22:02 - PathSetter: home=/usr/share/tomcat
 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - ContextXmlReader: Context
 config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-examples.xml
 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - Ctx(/jsp) : Setting debug to 1
 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - AutoWebApp: Auto-Adding DEFAULT:/
 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - AutoWebApp: Loaded from config: 
 DEFAULT:/examples
 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Tomcat configured and 
 in stable state
 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/examples
 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/jsp
 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/ROOT
 
 thaths@daemon:[55] ~ $ telnet localhost 8007
 Trying 127.0.0.1...
 telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
 thaths@daemon:[56] ~ $ telnet localhost 8009
 Trying 127.0.0.1...
 telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
 
 I'd really like to work using the IBM JDK.  What am I doing 
 wrong?  The 
 configurations remain the same in both cases.  Your help would be 
 greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Thaths
 -- 
 Lisa:  I'm studying for the math fair.  If I win, I'll bring home a
 brand new protractor.
 Homer: Too bad we don't live on a farm.
 thaths at aunet.org   Slacker At Large   http://www.aunet.org/~thaths/
 Key fingerprint = 8A 84 2E 67 10 9A 64 03  24 38 B6 AB 1B 6E 8C E4
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Initialization in Tomcat 4.0.3

2002-04-16 Thread Larry Isaacs

In Tomcat 4.x, this is accomplished by adding a LifecycleListener
to the appropriate container, Engine, Host, etc.  An example of
how something like this is done may be found at:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/host.html#User%20Web%20Applications

In this case, the Listener is added to the Host container.  It
adds user home directories as contexts when the Lifecyle.START_EVENT
occurs.  See the org.apache.catalina.startup.UserConfig source
for implementation details.  Hopefully, this will get you started.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Subir Sengupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:08 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Initialization in Tomcat 4.0.3
 
 
 Hi,
 
 In Tomcat 3 we initialized stuff with the RequestInterceptor 
 element in
 web.xml like this:
 
 RequestInterceptor
   debug=0
   className=org.apache.tomcat.init.Init /
 
 Init has a engineInit method that looks like this:
 public final class Init extends BaseInterceptor
 .
 .
 .
 public void engineInit(ContextManager cm) throws TomcatException {
   CategoryNames.init();
 
 etc
 
 How do I the same thing in Tomcat 4.0.3 ?
 
 Thanks from a Tomcat newbie,
 Subir
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Subir Sengupta (E-mail).vcf 
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Upgrading from Tomcat 3.2.1 to tomcat 3.3.1

2002-04-16 Thread Larry Isaacs



 -Original Message-
 From: Michel COTE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:06 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Upgrading from Tomcat 3.2.1 to tomcat 3.3.1
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I'm using Jakarta Tomcat 3.2.1since one year.
 As i had to install a new machine, i decided to use instead 
 Tomcat 3.3.1
 
 My JSP files use the classes of a package on my server (by 
 importing them). 
 With 3.3.1 i am unable to use the classes of this package in my JSP 
 classes. Looks like the CLASSPATH is no more use !?

Correct.  See the following for information on configuring classes
in Tomcat 3.3.x:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ug.html#configuring_classes

 
 With 3.2.1 i used to put the classpath in a 
 TOMCAT_HOME\conf\wrapper.properties files. This file as moved 
 or disappear, 
 where can i define the classpath of Tomcat 3.3.1.

It is now in conf\jk.  Note that this file has an issue in that
it requires an extra modification before use.  For details, see the
note at:

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/

Cheers,
Larry

 
 Thanks for any precious help and sorry for my bad english !
 
 Michel COTE.
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: keystore not found in tomcat-3.3.1-dev

2002-04-15 Thread Larry Isaacs

Try:

keystore=/usr/cert/.keystore

and see if that works.  Its hard to tell from the error output
if this is the only problem.  Hopefully, it is.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: IS400 ABB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 9:47 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: keystore not found in tomcat-3.3.1-dev
 
 
 I'm running Tomcat-jakarta-3.3.1-dev with SSL.
 Problem: How to get SSL working when I specify the keystore path in 
 server.xml?
 
 I have created a keystore file (.keystore) with the following command:
 keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA -keystore 
 /usr/cert/.keystore
 
 In server.xml i then setup the following connector:
 Http10Connector  port=443
 secure=true
 keystore=/usr/cert
 keypass=changeit
 clientAuth=false
 maxThreads=100
 maxSpareThreads=50
 minSpareThreads=10 /
 
 The error of starting Tomcat can be seen below!
 It works fine when I create a .keystore file in the root 
 directory (current 
 user home dir)!
 
 Output from starting Tomcat:
 Using classpath: 
 /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1-dev/bin/../lib/tomcat.jar
 Using JAVA_HOME: /usr/opt/java131
 Using TOMCAT_HOME: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1-dev
 ragge# 2002-04-15 12:37:59 - ServerXmlReader: 
 Config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/server.xml
 2002-04-15 12:37:59 - PathSetter: 
 home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1-dev
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - ContextXmlReader: Context 
 config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-127.0.0.1.xml
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - ContextXmlReader: Context 
 config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-admin.xml
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - ContextXmlReader: Context 
 config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-examples.xml
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - ContextXmlReader: Context 
 config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-is400.xml
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - AutoWebApp: Loaded from config: DEFAULT:/admin
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - AutoWebApp: Auto-Adding DEFAULT:/
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - AutoWebApp: Loaded from config: 
 DEFAULT:/examples
 2002-04-15 12:38:00 - ContextManager: Tomcat configured and 
 in stable state
 2002-04-15 12:38:01 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/admin
 2002-04-15 12:38:01 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/examples
 2002-04-15 12:38:01 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/admin
 2002-04-15 12:38:01 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/ROOT
 EmbededTomcat: Init time 8591
 2002-04-15 12:38:03 - Http10Interceptor: Starting on 80
 Guessed home=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1-dev
 java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: 
 org.apache.tomcat.core.TomcatException: Root cause -
 //.keystore (No such file or directory)
 at 
 org.apache.tomcat.modules.server.PoolTcpConnector.engineStart (pc 
 102)
 at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.start
(pc 37)
 at org.apache.tomcat.startup.EmbededTomcat.start  
(pc 29)
 at org.apache.tomcat.startup.EmbededTomcat.execute1   
(pc 72)
 at org.apache.tomcat.startup.EmbededTomcat$1.run  
(pc 4)
 at 
 org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.Jdk12Support$PrivilegedProxy.run 
 (pc 4)
 at 
 java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.security.Priv
 ilegedExceptionAction,jav
 a.security.AccessControlContext) (AccessController.java)
 at 
 org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.Jdk12Support.doPrivileged (pc 52)
 at org.apache.tomcat.startup.EmbededTomcat.execute
(pc 20)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java)
 at org.apache.tomcat.util.IntrospectionUtils.execute  
(pc 58)
 at org.apache.tomcat.startup.Main.execute 
(pc 138)
 at org.apache.tomcat.startup.Main.main
(pc 14)
 
 
 Thank you in advance for any comments!
 /Per
 
 
 _
 Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på http://explorer.msn.se/intl.asp
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: changing auto log rotation in TC3.3 ?

2002-04-11 Thread Larry Isaacs

I haven't personally verified it, but I think there is
a bug in Tomcat 3.3.x's logger in that the log file is
restarted each day.  If the name doesn't change each day,
then the log file gets overwritten each day until it does
change.  The logger needs to be updated to append rather
that overwrite when the log is restarted.

Ignacio, have you done log rotations longer than daily?
The above is based on code inspection, so I could be
wrong.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:00 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: changing auto log rotation in TC3.3 ?
 
 
  De: Ray Pitmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Enviado el: jueves 11 de abril de 2002 20:35
 
  1)  how do I make it so that tomcat will only rotate logs weekly or
  monthly?
 
 add this template ${MM} to your logger filename as timestamp, you
 will get monthly logs, 
 
 is a SimpleDateFormat check
 http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/docs/api/java/text/Simpl
eDateForma
t.html to know what you can do, search the docs for your JVM version to
see what  can be done, you can get weekly logs.. and much more..

 2)  can I make it so that the servlet logs aren't overwritten 
 every time
 I restart tomcat?

Maybe worth add a new attribute setting for that? please post a RFE to
bugzilla for that too, this will remind to add this .. TIA

 3)  why does tomcat decide to rotate the logs at 1am instead of
 midnight?

You've find a bug , please post it to bugzilla, may be the DST, just
started, is not taken into account.

 4)  Are there any other attributes to LogSetter? (I only see 5 in the
 doc, with nothing pertaining to rotation)

look at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/a
pache/tomcat/modules/config/LogSetter.java?rev=1.14content-type=text/pl
ain the setters of the logsetter class are the available attributes,
that pertain to the logsetter element in server.xml

Shortly will be possible to use log4j, i think that feature is in CVS
already, and most of this problems will go away, in all or in part.. ;)

Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: changing auto log rotation in TC3.3 ?

2002-04-11 Thread Larry Isaacs

I was going to try to add an append attribute to
LogSetter and have the restarts always append.  If
you want to commit something, go ahead.  If not, I'll
look into it.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:36 PM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: changing auto log rotation in TC3.3 ?
 
 
  De: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Enviado el: jueves 11 de abril de 2002 21:15
 
  Ignacio, have you done log rotations longer than daily?
  The above is based on code inspection, so I could be
  wrong.
 
 Yep, when i did the log rotation, but never more after that may be i
 left a bug behind me.. hmmm, yes, you are right, Filewriter is not
 created in append mode..
 
 Should i commit it? 
 
 May be add a new attribute to LogSetter to control the 
 appending or not?
 
 Better get rid of this capability alltogether and wait for log4j
 support?
 
 Saludos ,
 Ignacio J. Ortega
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Bug in Tomcat 3.3.1 with getPathInfo() ?

2002-04-10 Thread Larry Isaacs

According to RFC2396, '+' is are reserved character in the
query string, but not in the path portion of a URL.  There
was a bug fix in Tomcat 3.3.1 to avoid translating '+'
to ' ' in the parts of the URL prior to the query string.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Olaf Vetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:40 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Bug in Tomcat 3.3.1 with getPathInfo() ?
 
 
 As far as I understand, calling request.getPathInfo() should 
 return an encoded string.
 With Tomcat 3.3.1, it returns the plus sign instead of 
 encoding it to a space.
 (Besides, it works ok with Tomcat 3.2X)
 
 Is this a bug or intended?
 
 Thanks in advance
 Olaf Vetter
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Bug in Tomcat 3.3.1 with getPathInfo() ?

2002-04-10 Thread Larry Isaacs

I think if request.getPathInfo() returns '/Hit+Run', then
the path info was '/Hit+Run' or '/Hit%2BRun'.   The path
would have to be '/Hit%20Run' for getPathInfo() to return
'/Hit Run' on Tomcat 3.3.1.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Olaf Vetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Bug in Tomcat 3.3.1 with getPathInfo() ?
 
 
 OK. But now, is there any way to distinguish between a '+'
 that results from encoding '%2B' and a '+' that stands for ' ' ?
 
 In other words, if request.getPathInfo() returns '/Hit+Run' , 
 this could be '/Hit+Run' or '/Hit Run' ...
 
 Olaf
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.04.2002 17:07 
 According to RFC2396, '+' is are reserved character in the
 query string, but not in the path portion of a URL.  There
 was a bug fix in Tomcat 3.3.1 to avoid translating '+'
 to ' ' in the parts of the URL prior to the query string.
 
 Cheers,
 Larry
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: jk_nt_service fails (error 1067)

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

Elsewhere in wrappers.properties two log files are defined.
Are these log files created?  If not, it suggests that
jk_nt_service is not finding the wrapper.properties or
maybe the wrapper.properties has some error that prevents
it from being processed (I have never seen such an error
though).

If the log files exist but don't contain any clues, I
would recommend manually building the wrapper.cmd_line
with all the substitutions and executing that in a DOS
prompt to see what happens.  Hopefully it will reveal
the error the service is encountering with it tries
to execute this command.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Alexander Höglind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:55 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: jk_nt_service fails (error 1067)
 
 
 Hi,
 I'm using Tomcat 4.03 and this is what I found at the end of the file,
 *
 #wrapper.cmd_line=$(wrapper.javabin) 
 -Djava.security.policy==$(wrapper.tomcat_policy) 
 -Dtomcat.home=$(wrapper.tomcat_home) -classpath 
 $(wrapper.class_path) $(wrapper.startup_class) -config 
 $(wrapper.server_xml) 
 
 wrapper.cmd_line=$(wrapper.javabin) -Xrs 
 -Djava.security.policy==$(wrapper.tomcat_policy) 
 -Dtomcat.home=$(wrapper.tomcat_home) -classpath 
 $(wrapper.class_path) $(wrapper.startup_class) -config 
 $(wrapper.server_xml) start
 *
 
 Soo it seems like it is already fixed by default.
 
 Thanx,
 Alexander
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Lecaros, Noel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 6:41 PM
 Subject: RE: jk_nt_service fails (error 1067)
 
 
 Hi,
 
 Have you looked in %TOMCAT_HOME%\logs\jvm.stderr?  This message looks
 familiar.  There appears to be an issue with the 
 wrapper.properties file
 (the one you should specify as a command-line argument to 
 jk_nt_service.exe)
 in that the property wrapper.jvm.options is not being read properly.
 Either remove this from the wrapper.cmd_line (found at the 
 end of the file)
 or set wrapper.jvm.options=-Xrs.  This issue is actually documented
 somewhere in the mailing list, which makes a case for 
 better documentation
 for Tomcat.
 
 Regards,
 
 Noel Lecaros
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Alexander Höglind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 9:19 AM
 To: Tomcat User
 Subject: jk_nt_service fails (error 1067)
 
 
 Hi,
 I'm using Tomcat 4.03 on win2000 server(sp2) and IIS 5.0
 Tomcat seems to work fine (mysite.com:8080) but I can't get 
 jk_nt_service to
 work.
 I have disabled tomcat.exe in my services and restarted the 
 server, but the
 service doesn't start. My operating system is in swedish but 
 this is an
 error I found in this group that looks like it:
 ***
 A system error has occurred.
 System error 1067 has occurred.
 The process terminated unexpectedly.
 ***
 I couldn't find an answer to the old message so I ask again. 
 Why can't I
 have this service started. Just to see that it wasn't my 
 server that was
 messed up, I installed tomcat on win2000 prof (sp2) with 
 default IIS and it
 generates the same error.
 
 If I try to start the service in the Command Prompt (jk_nt_service -s
 Tomcat) and it generates this error:
 *
 Asked (and given) winsoc
 Starting Tomcat.
 Tomcat failed to start.
 *
 
 The service is started by following command: 
 jk_nt_service.exe Tomcat in
 win2000 services.
 If I try that in the Command Promt I get the following error:
 
 Asked (and given) winsock 1.1
 Error: StartServiceCtrlDispatcher failed.
 ***
 
 Can it have to do with spaces in my tomcat installation dir. 
 d:\Java\Apache
 Tomcat 4.0 ?
 
 
 Thanx for any help,
 Alexander Höglind
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: setProperty

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

This is specified behavior.  Section JSP.4.2  of the
JSP 1.2 spec states for the property attribute of
jsp:setProperty ...:

The name of the Bean property whose value you want to set.
If you set propertyName to * then the tag will iterate over
the current ServletRequest parameters, matching parameter
names and value type(s) to property names and setter
method type(s), setting each matched property to the value
of the matching parameter. If a parameter has a value of ,
the corresponding property is not modified.

Note the last sentence.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Sipos Andras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:54 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: setProperty 
 
 
 Hi,
 
 If  put a empty value via http GET parameter then it not call 
 the objects
 setter method
 
 What is the problem?
 
 Example:
 updater.jsp?val1=val2=%val3=
 
 in updater.jsp:
 jsp:setProperty name=credit property=* /
 
 MySystem:
 jdk1.3.1_02
 jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2
 win98.hu
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
Webmail for nuts!
 http://squirrelmail.org/
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: integrating TOMCAT 4.0 with APACHE 2.0 - or Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

The API to Apache 2 is very different from Apache 1.3.x.  It was
also evolving, so it wasn't practical to include a working Apache 2
connector in Tomcat 3.3.x, or Tomcat 4.x for that matter.
The mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so is likely a version that Henri Gomez built
a while ago, and is probably out of date with respect to the current
Apache 2.

Work on a mod_jk, actually mod_jk2, connector for Tomcat 3.3.x
and Tomcat 4.x is being actively worked on as part of the
jakarta-tomcat-connectors project.  You can check the mail archives
of tomcat-dev to see what is being done.  The mod_jk2 for Apache 2
appears within the jakarta-tomcat-connectors repository under
jk/native2 directory.

Cheers,
Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: David Cassidy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:28 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: integrating TOMCAT 4.0 with APACHE 2.0 - or Tomcat 3.3.1
 
 
 I'd really quite like to try Tomcat 3.3.1 with apache 2.0
 
 I've tried the binaries for apache 2 - for linux
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i386/ 
 mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so 
 
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so
 
 Apache says 'httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this 
 version of Apache.'
 
 If I try to build the version from source - There isn't an apache2 
 version in the source
 distro of Tomcat 3.3.1
 
 Help 
 
 Thanks
 
 David


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: integrating TOMCAT 4.0 with APACHE 2.0 - or Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

The Apache 2.0 connector I think is called mod_jk2 and is built
from the jk/native2 directory.  The jk/native directory builds
mod_jk, which is an Apache 1.3 connector that won't work with
Apache 2.0.  I haven't done anything with mod_jk2 yet, so I can't
say whether the current mod_jk2 will satisfy your definition of
working.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Mauricio Nuñez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:06 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: integrating TOMCAT 4.0 with APACHE 2.0 - or Tomcat 3.3.1
 
 
 I'm trying the same!
 I get the CVS copy of jakarta-tomcat-connector, build and 
 mod_jk.so, but it's 
 don work!
 I get an error 500, handler not found.
 Can somebody release an working mod_jk.so for apache 2.0 please.
 
 Thanks
 
 
 El Mar 09 Abr 2002 08:27, David Cassidy escribió:
  I'd really quite like to try Tomcat 3.3.1 with apache 2.0
 
  I've tried the binaries for apache 2 - for linux
 
  
 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1
/bin/linux/i3
86/ mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so
 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i
386/mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so

 Apache says 'httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this
 version of Apache.'

 If I try to build the version from source - There isn't an apache2
 version in the source
 distro of Tomcat 3.3.1

 Help 

 Thanks

 David

 Mike Dewhirst wrote:
 has anybody successfully integrated Apache 2 with Tomcat 4? If yes, how
 did
 you do it, I can't figure it out. If it's RTFM -  which part, I couldn't
 find it in the docs...
 
 
 =**


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: NoClassDefFoundError With Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

Yes, it is a known issue for Tomcat 4.0.2 and 4.0.3. Putting
the jars in $CATALINA_HOME/lib or $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib
is the only workaround for these versions.  To get the bugfix,
you will need to upgrade to the nightly Tomcat 4.x or
Tomcat 4.0.4-b1, or later.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Bryan Joyner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:21 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: NoClassDefFoundError With Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1 
 
 
 I'm getting a NoClassDefFoundError in a servlet when loading
 javax.xml.transform.Source. Im using Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1.
 xalan.jar and xml-apis.jar are both in my war file in the WEB-INF/lib
 directory. I have worked around the problem  by putting these jars in
 the $CATALINA_HOME/lib. But I don't want to have to do this. Is this a
 known issues? 
 
 Bryan Joyner
 Sr. Software Engineer
 ZixIt Corporation
 
 Office: (214) 370-2027
 Fax: (214) 370-2073
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To send email secure and certified, Just ZixIt!(tm) 
 zixmail(tm) is the most convenient way to add security to 
 your email. If
 you would like to add privacy, security and certified receipts to your
 email, download zixmail(tm) from http://www.zixmail.com. 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat intermittent failures

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

Do you know if a request might be accessing the JSP page while
another request is trying to compile the updated version?
Also, I assume if it is not found through Apache, it is also
not found accessing Tomcat directly?

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: David Bank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:56 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat intermittent failures
 
 
 Good morning, afternoon, evening, or whichever local 
 timeperiod you are
 currently experiencing. I've just joined the list, seeking help on a
 rather perplexing Tomcat problem we've been having. All 
 assistance will
 be greatly appreciated.
 
 Our environment
 Windows 2000 Server (sorry) with SP2 (we're moving to Linux, I
 promise!)
 Apache v1.3.23
 Tomcat v3.3a (running as a NT service)
 Sun JDK 1.3.1_02
 
 Our problem
 Occasionally, especially after editing a JSP file or files, 
 Tomcat will
 suddenly fail to find the .java and .class files that go with a
 particular JSP. Looking in the work directory reveals that the files
 exist, but when we attempt to access that particular JSP thru 
 Apache, we
 get 404 - File Not Found. 
 
 We have had some success in causing this problem to go away 
 by shutting
 down the Apache and Tomcat services, deleting the appropriate 
 .java and
 .class (and .ver) files, restarting the Tomcat and Apache 
 services, and
 hitting Reload on the browser. Sometimes (about 50% of the 
 time) when we
 do this, Tomcat suddenly finds the files and the JSP runs, new .java
 and .class files are created, and we get the proper output. The
 remaining 50% of the time, it falls to one of two 
 happenstances. Either
 (30%) we do the shutdown-services-and-delete routine followed by a
 reboot and the problem goes away, or (20%) we keep retrying 
 on different
 clients until the problem suddenly vanishes.
 
 This problem is intermittent. Sometimes we'll get it with FOO.JSP but
 not BAR.JSP. We'll then take a corrective action (described above) and
 suddenly we'll get it with BAR.JSP but not FOO.JSP. Both JSP files are
 very similar, and there's nothing exotic about our coding. 
 Sometimes the
 problem goes away with some waiting.
 
 This happens with both IE and Netscape clients, and with clients on
 different networks and behind different firewall/proxy 
 situations, so we
 don't think that firewall, proxy or other network architecture issues
 are contributing factors. This happens to clients on the same 
 LAN as the
 servers.
 
 Needless to say, we're quite perplexed, and don't understand what is
 going wrong. If anyone has any suggestions or recommendations, please
 respond.
 
 David Bank
 NC CATS Project Manager
 Accountability Services - Testing
 NC Department of Public Instruction
 301  Wilmington Street
 Raleigh, NC  27601
 919-807-3796
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: $CATALINA_HOME/shared deprecated? [was Re: NoClassDefFoundError With Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1]

2002-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs

More acurately, $CATALINA_HOME/lib is the shared classloader
(there is no $CATALINA_HOME/shared directory).  It is the place
to put shared jars that you don't want to be visible to the
Catalina classloader.

I'm not sure whether include $CATALINA_HOME/shared in the
classpath is referring to the JVM's classpath or that classes
aren't visible to your web application.  They won't appear
on the JVM's classpath because Catalina builds the classloader
hierarchy at startup.  The JVM's classpath appears as part
of the system classloader in the diagram shown on the document
cited.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Aditya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:52 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: $CATALINA_HOME/shared deprecated? [was Re: 
 NoClassDefFoundError With Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1]
 
 
 4.0.4-B2-01 doesn't seem to include $CATALINA_HOME/shared in 
 the classpath
 however the documentation still says that that's the place to 
 put local,
 shared jars:
 
   
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/class-loader-h
 owto.html
 
 Thanks,
 Adi
 
 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:38:27PM -0400, Larry Isaacs wrote:
  Yes, it is a known issue for Tomcat 4.0.2 and 4.0.3. Putting
  the jars in $CATALINA_HOME/lib or $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib
  is the only workaround for these versions.  To get the bugfix,
  you will need to upgrade to the nightly Tomcat 4.x or
  Tomcat 4.0.4-b1, or later.
  
  Cheers,
  Larry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Bryan Joyner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:21 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: NoClassDefFoundError With Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1 
   
   
   I'm getting a NoClassDefFoundError in a servlet when loading
   javax.xml.transform.Source. Im using Tomcat 4.0.2 and Xalan 2.3.1.
   xalan.jar and xml-apis.jar are both in my war file in the 
 WEB-INF/lib
   directory. I have worked around the problem  by putting 
 these jars in
   the $CATALINA_HOME/lib. But I don't want to have to do 
 this. Is this a
   known issues? 
   
   Bryan Joyner
   Sr. Software Engineer
   ZixIt Corporation
   
   Office: (214) 370-2027
   Fax: (214) 370-2073
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To send email secure and certified, Just ZixIt!(tm) 
   zixmail(tm) is the most convenient way to add security to 
   your email. If
   you would like to add privacy, security and certified 
 receipts to your
   email, download zixmail(tm) from http://www.zixmail.com. 
   
   
   
   --
   To unsubscribe:   
 mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For 
 additional commands: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Troubles with the list: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  --
  
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands: 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Troubles with 
 the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Query regarding mod_jk.conf-auto

2002-04-08 Thread Larry Isaacs

In Tomcat 3.2.x you will have to modify
src/share/org/apache/tomcat/task/ApacheConfig.java, re-compile
and update your webserver.jar.  (In Tomcat 3.3.x, this is
configurable.)

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: sharadsk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:10 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Query regarding mod_jk.conf-auto
 
 
 Hi,
  We have requirement where we want to use mod_jk.conf-auto 
 file, for Apache configuration. This file whenevr generated 
 by Tomcat puts default LoadModule directive, which is 
 LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
 
 We want this directive to be 
 LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so, each time this file 
 is generated.
 
 Is there any way to achieve this?
 
 We are using Tomcat 3.2.4.
 
 TIA
 -Sharad Kasab
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: jk_nt_service fails (error 1067)

2002-04-08 Thread Larry Isaacs

Any errors reported in the log files specified within
wrapper.properties?

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Alexander Höglind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 12:19 PM
 To: Tomcat User
 Subject: jk_nt_service fails (error 1067)
 
 
 Hi,
 I'm using Tomcat 4.03 on win2000 server(sp2) and IIS 5.0
 Tomcat seems to work fine (mysite.com:8080) but I can't get 
 jk_nt_service to work.
 I have disabled tomcat.exe in my services and restarted the 
 server, but the service doesn't start. My operating system is 
 in swedish but this is an error I found in this group that 
 looks like it:
 ***
 A system error has occurred.
 System error 1067 has occurred.
 The process terminated unexpectedly.
 ***
 I couldn't find an answer to the old message so I ask again. 
 Why can't I have this service started. Just to see that it 
 wasn't my server that was messed up, I installed tomcat on 
 win2000 prof (sp2) with default IIS and it generates the same error.
 
 If I try to start the service in the Command Prompt 
 (jk_nt_service -s Tomcat) and it generates this error:
 *
 Asked (and given) winsoc
 Starting Tomcat.
 Tomcat failed to start.
 *
 
 The service is started by following command: 
 jk_nt_service.exe Tomcat in win2000 services.
 If I try that in the Command Promt I get the following error:
 
 Asked (and given) winsock 1.1
 Error: StartServiceCtrlDispatcher failed.
 ***
 
 Can it have to do with spaces in my tomcat installation dir. 
 d:\Java\Apache Tomcat 4.0 ?
 
 
 Thanx for any help,
 Alexander Höglind
 
 
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 4.0.3 and JAXP1.2

2002-04-08 Thread Larry Isaacs

A bug (Bugzilla #6374) in Tomcat 4.0.2/4.0.3 requires
XML parsers to be placed in common/lib.  The bug is they
won't work in WEB-INF/lib.  This is fixed in Tomcat 4.x and
4.0.4-b1, or later.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:02 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 4.0.3 and JAXP1.2
 
 
 Hi
 I am trying to use JAXP1.2 (from the 
 java_xml_pack-spring02-dev from SUN) 
 with Tomcat 4.03 (jdk1.3.1_03). I have put all the jar files 
 from JAXP1.2 
 into the WEB-INF/lib directory of my webapplication.
 When a servlet tries to instantiate a class which uses JAXP 
 features (for 
 XSL-transformation) it becomes unavailable: (from 
 localhost_log)2002-04-07 
 16:04:20 StandardWrapper
 [/WFB:EntryConfirmServlet]: Marking servlet 
 EntryConfirmServlet as unavailable
 2002-04-07 16:04:20 StandardContext[/WFB]: Servlet /WFB threw load() 
 exception javax.servlet.ServletException: Error instantiating 
 servlet class 
 de.wfb.servlets.EntryConfirmServlet at 
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardW
 rapper.java:893)
  
 at 
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(StandardWrapper.
 java:808)
  ..
 - Root Cause -
 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
 javax/xml/transform/TransformerException at 
 java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Native Method) at 
 java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:232) at 
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardW
 rapper.java:884)
  
 at 
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(StandardWrapper.
 java:808) at 
 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.loadOnStartup(Standar
 dContext.java:32
 
 66)
 In a documentation about Tomcat 4 (seems not to be specific 
 for 4.03) I have 
 found:
 By default the Java API for XML Processing (Version 1.1) reference 
 implementation is utilized  
 However this parser is not visible for to web applications ...
 To make an XML parser available to your web applications, ...
 To utilize an XML parser in a single web application simply 
 include the 
 parser's JAR files in the /WEB-INF/web.xml (?? I guess that 
 should read 
 /WEB-INF/lib) directory of the application. This will work, 
 no matter what 
 parser might be used 
 The class in question compiles and runs in a stand-alone version.
 Any ideas?
 
 Many thanks,
 
 Hans
 
 
 
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 4.0.3 and Maverick

2002-04-08 Thread Larry Isaacs

I assume this is the same problem as in a recent post:

A bug (Bugzilla #6374) in Tomcat 4.0.2/4.0.3 requires
XML parsers to be placed in common/lib.  The bug is they
won't work in WEB-INF/lib.  This is fixed in Tomcat 4.x and
4.0.4-b1, or later.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:00 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 4.0.3 and Maverick
 
 
 I'm using Tomcat 4.0.1 successfully with Maverick 1.0.1.
 
  With the same application deployment, I can't get Maverick 
 to work with
 Tomcat 4.0.3; I get classdef not found exceptions on
 javax/xml/transform/TransformerException, even with the 
 Maverick example
 programs.
 
 I've tried Maverick 2.0 also, with the same results.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks
 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Pbs with tomcat 3.3a and IIS connector : windows auth fails

2002-04-02 Thread Larry Isaacs

Make sure that you set tomcatAuthentication=false on the
Ajp13Connector element in the server.xml file.  Otherwise,
Tomcat 3.3.x ignores any authentication done by IIS.

Cheers,
Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Pbs with tomcat 3.3a and IIS connector : windows auth fails
 
 
 I'm using W2K Professionnal with IIS 5 + Tomcat 3.3a,
 Tomcat configured with IIS connector.
 
 Jakarta virtual dir authentication method setted like this :
 - anonymous access : unchecked
 - basic authentication : unckecked
 - windows auth : checked
 
 I try to read the current windows user with 
 request.getUserPrincipal() but it
 always says null : can someone help ?
 
 Thanks
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending requests

2002-03-29 Thread Larry Isaacs

Ajp13 should be the one to use.  Does the mod_jk.log indicate
that the request is or isn't being forwarded to Tomcat?

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:24 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but 
 not sending requests
 
 
 The mod_jk has been built successfully, and everything starts 
 but mod_jk
 does not seem to be sending requests through.  This exact same
 configuration and mod_jk.conf files work on Solaris, and HP, with no
 problems.
 
 Pages served directly through Apache work fine, as well as 
 pages served
 directly through tomcat.  When we access a page that goes 
 through Apache
 and then uses the mod_jk to route to Tomcat we have problems. 
  The requests
 just never seem to make it to the servlets.  even the Tomcat 
 examples do
 not work.
 
 Logs do not really show anything even when turned up.  Also 
 the ajp12.id
 file seems to get deleted randomly, but this could be something else.
 Should ajp13 work fine in AIX 4.3.3 or should we use ajp12.
 
 Any idea would be great and Thanks,
 Jay
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Installing Tomcat 3.3.1 as a service

2002-03-29 Thread Larry Isaacs

This was my mistake.  I added wrapper.jvm.options to
make it easy to add options.  It was originally tested
with Jdk1.3.1 with -Xrs as the options.  This worked.
However, when I tried it with Jdk1.2.2 I found that the
-Xrs option was not supported, so I defaulted the
wrapper.jvm.options to being empty.  This incorrectly
assumed that the options would expand to blank in
the wrapper.cmd_line string.

Thus, the wrapper.jvm.options must not be blank, or
it must be removed from the wrapper.cmd_line string.
I would recommend making it non-blank using one of the
heap options.  If you are using Jdk 1.3 or later, include
the -Xrs option.

The == is deliberate.  It means *replace* the default
properties using the specified properties file.  Using
just = means *append* to the default properties.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: MERRITT, TONY (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:31 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Installing Tomcat 3.3.1 as a service
 
 
 I just installed Tomcat 3.3.1 and wanted to run it as a 
 service on Windows
 2000.  I followed the instructions in the Tomcat 
 documentation, adding the
 wrapper.tomcat_home and wrapper.java_home values, but was 
 unable to start
 the service using either jk_nt_service.exe or the net start 
 command.  The
 Tomcat log reported that it was unable to find the class file
 $(wrapper/jvm/options).  Since the variable 
 wrapper.jvm.options was not
 being assigned a value (or was blank), I removed:
   -Djava.security.policy==$(wrapper.tomcat_policy)
 (notice the double equal sign...is that also a mistake in the 
 install file?)
 from the wrapper.cmd_line and put it as the value for 
 wrapper.jvm.options:
   
 wrapper.jvm.options=-Djava.security.policy=$(wrapper.tomcat_policy)
 That made the service able to start.  Was I off-base and 
 missing something
 before making those changes?
 
 Thanks,
 Tony
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending requests

2002-03-29 Thread Larry Isaacs

The ajp12.id file is used only for shutdown.  It isn't used
at all by mod_jk.  However, a bug/feature in tomcat.sh
would delete this file if Tomcat was started two time in
a row, making it necessary to specify the Ajp12 port in the
shutdown command.  I'm not sure if this is what is occurring,
or the absence of ajp12.id is an indication that Tomcat did
not start successfully.

Does the Tomcat log show that the Interceptors are starting
successfully on ports 8080,8007, and 8009?

Also, what is the test request you are trying to execute
in your browser?  What is the response you get?  With
JkLogLevel set to debug, you should see evidence in mod_jk's
log of its inspection of every request that Apache receives.
I'm not sure why you would see any indication of the requests
Apache is receiving.

Cheers,
Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:09 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, 
 but not sending requests
 
 
 
 Larry,
 
  Thanks for the response.
 
  I'm Seeing two different things.  When the ajp12.id file is not
 working correctly we get this in the log
   [jk_connect.c (108)]: Into jk_open_socket
   [jk_connect.c (115)]: jk_open_socket, try to 
 connect socket = 6
   [jk_connect.c (124)]: jk_open_socket, after connect ret = -1
   [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() 
 failed errno = 79
 
  We think this is because ajp12.id file does not get 
 created correctly
 or is deleted automatically. So mod_jk has issues with the connection.
 
  When the ajp.id file is working correctly we see:
 
   [jk_worker.c (177)]: wc_create_worker, done
 [jk_worker.c (223)]: build_worker_map, removing old ajp13
 worker
 [jk_worker.c (235)]: build_worker_map, done
 [jk_worker.c (102)]: wc_open, done
   [jk_uri_worker_map.c (345)]: Into
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker
   [jk_uri_worker_map.c (407)]:
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a match ajp13
   [jk_worker.c (123)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13
   [jk_worker.c (127)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done  
 found a worker
   [jk_ajp13_worker.c (654)]: Into jk_worker_t::get_endpoint
   [jk_ajp13_worker.c (539)]: Into jk_endpoint_t::service
   [jk_ajp13.c (346)]: Into ajp13_marshal_into_msgb
   [jk_ajp13.c (480)]: ajp13_marshal_into_msgb - Done
   [jk_connect.c (108)]: Into jk_open_socket
   [jk_connect.c (115)]: jk_open_socket, try to 
 connect socket = 6
   [jk_connect.c (124)]: jk_open_socket, after connect ret = 0
   [jk_connect.c (132)]: jk_open_socket, set TCP_NODELAY to on
   [jk_connect.c (140)]: jk_open_socket, return, sd = 6
   [jk_ajp13_worker.c (167)]: In 
 jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat,
 connected sd = 6
 
 
  This is the end of that log (set on debug).  I do not 
 actually see
 where is says it passes on to Tomcat, and tomcat never gets 
 the request.
 We are not sure what is causing either of these problems.  Is there a
 particular user that tomcat or apache must be started as?  Do the file
 permission's/groups have something to so with it.  We are 
 starting as a
 special user but all of the files under Apache, and tomcat 
 are awned by it.
 
 Thanks for any help,
 Jay
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 Larry Isaacs  
   
   
 Larry.Isaacs@   To: 'Tomcat 
 Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 sas.com cc:  
   
   
  Subject: RE: 
 Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending 
  requests 
 03/29/2002
   
   
 08:34 AM  
   
   
 Please respond
   
   
 to Tomcat
   
   
 Users List

RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending requests

2002-03-29 Thread Larry Isaacs

Jay,

What happens if you try to access Apache content, such as
with just http://host:8080/? Does Apache successfully serve
content, or does these requests hang too?

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:01 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, 
 but not sending requests
 
 
 
 Larry,
 
  Thanks for the info on the ajp12.id file.  We may have 
 started tomcat
 twice or something.  We'll keep an eye out for that.
 
  The Tomcat log shows this at the end of the log after 
 initialization.
 that looks good compared to other OSes that we have this running on.
 
  2002-03-29 08:59:54 - Http10Interceptor: Starting on 8081
  2002-03-29 08:59:54 - Ajp12Interceptor: Starting on 8007
  2002-03-29 08:59:55 - Ajp13Interceptor: Starting on 8009
 
  The test request we are trying is the tomcat Examples so
 http://host:8080/examples;  Where 8080 is the port apache is 
 on.   All
 that happens on the AIX box when we do this is the browser 
 hangs, waiting
 for a response.
 
  On one of the Solaris boxes I turned the log level up to 
 debug on
 mod_jk, and saw all alot more information from where the AIX 
 box mod_jk log
 stopped.  I also saw it checking all of the requests like you 
 said , it is
 actually pretty cool.   So here it what I think we are 
 missing in the AIX
 mod_jk log that is showing up on the Solaris box.
 
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (368)]: 
 Attempting to
 map URI '/examples/'
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (391)]:
 jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a context match ajp13 -
 /examples/
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_worker.c (123)]: Into
 wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_worker.c (127)]:
 wc_get_worker_for_name, done  found a worker
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (865)]: Into
 jk_worker_t::get_endpoint
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (775)]: Into
 jk_endpoint_t::service
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (403)]: Into
 ajp13_marshal_into_msgb
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (537)]:
 ajp13_marshal_into_msgb - Done
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (206)]: sending to
 ajp13 #190
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (645)]: 
 send_request 2:
 request body to send 0 - request body to resend 0
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: 
 received from
 ajp13 #28
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (584)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: status = 200
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (591)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: Number of headers is = 1
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13.c (634)]:
 ajp13_unmarshal_response: Header[0] [Content-Type] = [text/html]
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: 
 received from
 ajp13 #1276
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: 
 received from
 ajp13 #2
  [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (549)]: Into
 jk_endpoint_t::done
 
 So something on the AIX is not letting the mod_jk get to 
 these logs.  On
 AIX we never get the sending to ajp13 #190 message or the 
 received from
 ajp13 #28.
 
 We are going to try some other stuff, as well as another 
 clean install and
 see if that helps.  Please let me know if you have any other idea?
 
 Thanks for all your help,
 Jay
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 Larry Isaacs  
   
   
 Larry.Isaacs@   To: 'Tomcat 
 Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 sas.com cc:  
   
   
  Subject: RE: 
 Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending 
   requests
 03/29/2002
   
   
 09:34 AM  
   
   
 Please respond
   
   
 to Tomcat
   
   
 Users List

RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending requests

2002-03-29 Thread Larry Isaacs

Jay,

Sounds like the problem is in the forwarding.  If you have
a second system available with Apache and/or Tomcat you might
try using the worker.ajp13.host property in workers.properties
to cross connect the Apaches and Tomcats and see if the
problem is on the mod_jk/Apache side and/or on the Tomcat/JVM
side.  I haven't worked with AIX, so I don't have any specific
help I can give.

Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:25 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, 
 but not sending requests
 
 
 
 Larry,
 
  When Access Apache content everything works fine.  Also 
 when access
 the examples directly through tomcat's http server (the embedded one)
 everything works fine.  It is only going through the mod_jk 
 that croaks.
 That is why I leaning towards some configuration with mod_jk 
 or something.
 but everything else works fine.
 
  We're not crazy or anything, the does work on other 
 people machine
 right?  mod_jk on AIX ?
 
 Thanks Again,
 Jay
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 Larry Isaacs  
   
   
 Larry.Isaacs@   To: 'Tomcat 
 Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 sas.com cc:  
   
   
  Subject: RE: 
 Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending 
  requests 
 03/29/2002
   
   
 10:15 AM  
   
   
 Please respond
   
   
 to Tomcat
   
   
 Users List   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 Jay,
 
 What happens if you try to access Apache content, such as
 with just http://host:8080/? Does Apache successfully serve
 content, or does these requests hang too?
 
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:01 AM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK,
  but not sending requests
 
 
 
  Larry,
 
   Thanks for the info on the ajp12.id file.  We may have
  started tomcat
  twice or something.  We'll keep an eye out for that.
 
   The Tomcat log shows this at the end of the log after
  initialization.
  that looks good compared to other OSes that we have this running on.
 
   2002-03-29 08:59:54 - Http10Interceptor: Starting on 8081
   2002-03-29 08:59:54 - Ajp12Interceptor: Starting on 8007
   2002-03-29 08:59:55 - Ajp13Interceptor: Starting on 8009
 
   The test request we are trying is the tomcat Examples so
  http://host:8080/examples;  Where 8080 is the port apache is
  on.   All
  that happens on the AIX box when we do this is the browser
  hangs, waiting
  for a response.
 
   On one of the Solaris boxes I turned the log level up to
  debug on
  mod_jk, and saw all alot more information from where the AIX
  box mod_jk log
  stopped.  I also saw it checking all of the requests like you
  said , it is
  actually pretty cool.   So here it what I think we are
  missing in the AIX
  mod_jk log that is showing up on the Solaris box.
 
   [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (368)]:
  Attempting to
  map URI '/examples/'
   [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (391)]:
  jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a context 
 match ajp13 -
  /examples/
   [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_worker.c (123)]: Into
  wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13
   [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_worker.c (127)]:
  wc_get_worker_for_name, done  found a worker
   [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (865)]: Into
  jk_worker_t::get_endpoint
   [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002]  [jk_ajp13_worker.c (775

RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending requests

2002-03-29 Thread Larry Isaacs


 -Original Message-
 From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:35 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, 
 but not sending requests
 
 
 
 Larry,
 
  Well, thanks for all of your help.  We will try you idea with the
 worker.ajp13.host.
 
  We just did a clean install of apache and tomcat with none of our
 other configuration stuff, and got the same problem.  We are leaning
 towards the fact that it could be our build of the mod_jk.so 
 file.  Even
 though it initializes correctly maybe there is just something screwy.
 
  You don't happen to have a AIX mod_jk.so binary kicking around?

Sorry, no.  Don't currently have access to an AIX system either.

Larry

 
 Thanks again,
 
 Jay
 
 
 
   
   
   
 Larry Isaacs  
   
   
 Larry.Isaacs@   To: 'Tomcat 
 Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 sas.com cc:  
   
   
  Subject: RE: 
 Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending 
   requests
 03/29/2002
   
   
 10:51 AM  
   
   
 Please respond
   
   
 to Tomcat
   
   
 Users List   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 Jay,
 
 Sounds like the problem is in the forwarding.  If you have
 a second system available with Apache and/or Tomcat you might
 try using the worker.ajp13.host property in workers.properties
 to cross connect the Apaches and Tomcats and see if the
 problem is on the mod_jk/Apache side and/or on the Tomcat/JVM
 side.  I haven't worked with AIX, so I don't have any specific
 help I can give.
 
 Larry
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:25 AM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK,
  but not sending requests
 
 
 
  Larry,
 
   When Access Apache content everything works fine.  Also
  when access
  the examples directly through tomcat's http server (the 
 embedded one)
  everything works fine.  It is only going through the mod_jk
  that croaks.
  That is why I leaning towards some configuration with mod_jk
  or something.
  but everything else works fine.
 
   We're not crazy or anything, the does work on other
  people machine
  right?  mod_jk on AIX ?
 
  Thanks Again,
  Jay
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Larry Isaacs
 
 
  Larry.Isaacs@   To: 'Tomcat
  Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  sas.com cc:
 
 
   Subject: RE:
  Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending
   requests
  03/29/2002
 
 
  10:15 AM
 
 
  Please respond
 
 
  to Tomcat
 
 
  Users List
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Jay,
 
  What happens if you try to access Apache content, such as
  with just http://host:8080/? Does Apache successfully serve
  content, or does these requests hang too?
 
  Larry
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:01 AM
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK,
   but not sending requests
  
  
  
   Larry,
  
Thanks for the info on the ajp12.id file.  We may have
   started tomcat
   twice or something.  We'll keep an eye out for that.
  
The Tomcat log shows this at the end of the log after
   initialization.
   that looks good compared to other OSes that we have this 
 running on.
  
2002-03-29 08:59:54

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >