Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 6/11/2005 10:45:23 PM Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthod 
  denied the whole story. He maintained that he told Harris that he (Harris) was 
  a victim of a fraud. In fact NO ONE at the time could decipher 
Egyptian.

Blaine: Anthon, not Anthod, may have done as you say, but denial 
after the fact happens all the time--proves nothing, as usual for 
yourattack on an otherwise valid story. 


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Dave Hansen
DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due to 
some other family complications, they allowed me to come home today.  
I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main computer, but 
my son was able to get one of our old laptops configured for wireless, 
and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I don't (yet anyway) have access 
to my old files, so if anybody sent me questions, ask them again or 
you'll just have to wait until I can wade through my backlog of mail 
that is awaiting my return upstairs!


   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short version 
is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I assumed I 
had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature fluctuations and 
getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of bed rest would allow 
it to run its course, that's pretty much all I did until Thursday when I 
discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery looking veins heading from my 
ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I was in ER getting antibiotics 
flowing into me, and a battery of tests that ultimately showed our worst 
fears were not realized, and I've probably get to keep the leg I use to 
kick cats through the uprights.   (I assume that will quell any 
sympathetic thoughts you might have, Izzy!):-)



   Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise

I alreadyhave a definition for humanism. I was askingfor YOUR definition.

JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:40:41 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.






I already sent you the website in the humanist?s own definition. Do you need it again?





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 5:50 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.




Did you answer my question: what is yourdefinition of a humanist? I don't think so. Please avail yourself. 



JD
-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:20:29 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.

No, I believe I said you are a humanist. So why aren't you? Izzy




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy TaylorSent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:30 PMTo: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.

Get a grip JD check your facts - and cease from slander. I have not called you anything of the kind

and I seriously doubt David has either since he is not into "name calling". If you keep this up then

nothing you say will mean much. jt





I think you are serious -- THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONCERN, my dear !!! And I am serious. 

I am not a humanist -- just a little loose talk in view of the fact that I have been called a humanist, 

of late, by David and Judy -- or at least my thinking has been given that label.. I am verymuch 

NOT a humanist. 



Again, your concern is much appreciated and some surprising. Guess I shouldn't have been surprised. 



Have a good day, today. 



JD
 


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise

Glad to hear that it is working out forthe best. Keep us up to date. It wasn't the flue(?) -- do you know what the problem was (is)? 

A prayerful friend

JD-Original Message-From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:12:24 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


DAVEH: Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week. I became rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER. Due to some other family complications, they allowed me to come home today. I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main computer, but my son was able to get one of our old laptops configured for wireless, and hence I'm back onlinesorta. I don't (yet anyway) have access to my old files, so if anybody sent me questions, ask them again or you'll just have to wait until I can wade through my backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs! Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short version is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I assumed I had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature fluctuations and getting the shakes and chills. Assuming a lot of bed rest would allow it to run its course, that's pretty much all I did until Thursday when I 
discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery looking veins heading from my ankle to my knee. A half hour later I was in ER getting antibiotics flowing into me, and a battery of tests that ultimately showed our worst fears were not realized, and I've probably get to keep the leg I use to kick cats through the uprights. (I assume that will quell any sympathetic thoughts you might have, Izzy!) :-) Cheerio.Dave--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed
.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke

Baline,

  Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when shown the evidence, even Thomas 
believed.  We will only know for sure when you present the facts and let me 
evaluate them. The point is that if there is no real evidence, then the 
scripture is most likely not related to the anecdote at all.


  Blaine, are you willing to admit that since there is no real evidence, 
then it is possible that the scripture is not related to the anecdote?


Perry


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:55:37 EDT



Blaine:  Probably nothing that would satisfy your Doubting Thomas
attitude, Perry.

In a message dated 6/11/2005 10:34:43 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Yes, I  have heard that story, but that does not relate the event to the
Isaiah  passage. We still have two separate stories with no ties other than
some  common words. One from scripture, one anecdotal. Do you have anything
that  actually links them?

Perry

From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill  Cumorah
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:28:12  EDT



Blaine:  Have you not read/heard the  story of  Martin Harris  taking
characters copied from the  plates (by JS) to Professor Charles  Anthon, 
and


first
being told they were true characters, but then being  rebuffed  by him 
when

he was
told a portion of the plates  were sealed, and therefore could  not be
dellivered to him for  translation?

In a message dated 6/11/2005 8:18:53 PM Mountain  Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Blaine   wrote: The sealed portion has yet to be  translated, but  
contains

the vision of all.   see Isaiah.   29:11






--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Dave, sorry to hear about your ER trip, but glad to hear you are back home 
recuperating. Take it easy and don;t rush things. At our age we don't 
recuperate like we did hen we were 19!


I can hear you now...ohh, I feel terrible...quick, get a laptop...I have to 
check in wth TT! :-)


Perry


From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:12:24 -0700

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became rather 
ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due to some other 
family complications, they allowed me to come home today.  I'm too weak to 
be climbing the stairs to access my main computer, but my son was able to 
get one of our old laptops configured for wireless, and hence I'm back 
onlinesorta.   I don't (yet anyway) have access to my old files, so if 
anybody sent me questions, ask them again or you'll just have to wait until 
I can wade through my backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs!


   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short version is 
that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I assumed I had a 
bad case of the flu due to wild temperature fluctuations and getting the 
shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of bed rest would allow it to run its 
course, that's pretty much all I did until Thursday when I discovered my 
leg had a lot of red spidery looking veins heading from my ankle to my 
knee.   A half hour later I was in ER getting antibiotics flowing into me, 
and a battery of tests that ultimately showed our worst fears were not 
realized, and I've probably get to keep the leg I use to kick cats through 
the uprights.   (I assume that will quell any sympathetic thoughts you 
might have, Izzy!):-)



   Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Terry Clifton
Sorry to hear that Dave.  Now you got us guessing.  Blood poison?  
Spider bite?  In any event I am praying for your recovery.

Terry

Dave Hansen wrote:

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due 
to some other family complications, they allowed me to come home 
today.  I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main 
computer, but my son was able to get one of our old laptops configured 
for wireless, and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I don't (yet 
anyway) have access to my old files, so if anybody sent me questions, 
ask them again or you'll just have to wait until I can wade through my 
backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs!


   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short version 
is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I assumed 
I had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature fluctuations and 
getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of bed rest would allow 
it to run its course, that's pretty much all I did until Thursday when 
I discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery looking veins heading 
from my ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I was in ER getting 
antibiotics flowing into me, and a battery of tests that ultimately 
showed our worst fears were not realized, and I've probably get to 
keep the leg I use to kick cats through the uprights.   (I assume that 
will quell any sympathetic thoughts you might have, Izzy!):-)



   Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread Terry Clifton




Lance Muir wrote:

  
  
  
  Once you understand 'belief', you
come to understand that everyone is (a 'believer')
  
  Everyone's life exemplifies their
belief.
  
  Belief is so fundamental that little
genuine engagement takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'.
Examples: (1)CPL stating that he is converting to LDS beliefs and,
understands that he has to forfeit his position as moderator but, would
like to remain part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie stating that she voted incorrectly in the last
Presidential election. She now recognizes that she should have voted
for the communist candidate.
  
  ==

I tried hard, but could not find anything with which to argue. You are
undoubtedlt correct in your above assumption.
Terry





Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Terry Clifton

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

Lance, what I also hear is that we all choose to believe what we want 
to believe, regardless of the facts, or lack thereof.


  However, I believe that when a grain of truth is revealed, but not 
immediately accepted, a cognitive dissonance is created and stored 
away that must eventually be resolved. This, I believe, is why people 
that, for example, become a Christian after denying the evidence for 
years, suddenly believe it ALL. The act of becoming a Christian 
resolves all of the small dissonant ideas they have stored away. So, I 
beleive that if Blaine ever decides to become a Christian, thus 
resolving all of the small dissonant facts he has stored away, he will 
be one of the greatest Christians ever. That is to say, when he takes 
all of the energy he expends defending a false religion, and turns it 
toward defending the truth, watch out!


  I speak from my own experience. I got to the point where I could no 
longer deny the truth. All of the lies I told myself about why I could 
not accept Christianity vanished literally overnight, and all of the 
truths I had learned through the years, but not accepted, all became a 
viable part of my belief.


Perry


=
What a refreshing morning!  Lance and Perry coming through with messages 
that make me stop and think.  How different from the I am right, you are 
wrong stuff we have been choking down.  Keep up the good work Guys (and 
ladies.)  I was about to become a drop out, but I may hang around a 
while if this stuff keeps coming.

Terry

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Blainerb473




Perry,
Since you are converting to LDS beliefs, and giving up your job as 
moderator, :) you are going to have to get with it regards believing via the 
influence of the Holy Ghost, rather than the hard, tangible evidence you have in 
the past gotten used to demanding. I for one rely on the evidence of 
praying in faith, then receiving the answer through the medium of the 
spirit--Spirit-of-God direct to my receiver spirit. But you do have to 
have your receiver in tune with the transmitters, Perry, otherwise this sort of 
evidence does not work. Just as when your radiois tuned off-station, 
or not working at all, or out of range of the signal, all you will recieve is 
static. I am afraid in the past that 
is all you have been receiving, for whatever reason--so you might consider 
getting a renewing of the spiritual receiver, is all I am saying. New 
spirits are extremely costly, they tell me, so that is obviously not an 
option. Take Care, Perry, and good luck with your newly acquired 
religion!! And, Congratulations on becoming One With The Saints!!!

Blainerb (not baline, please!!)




n a message dated 6/13/2005 6:55:55 AM Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Baline, Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when 
  shown the evidence, even Thomas believed. We will only know for sure 
  when you present the facts and let me evaluate them. The point is that if 
  there is no real evidence, then the scripture is most likely not related 
  to the anecdote at all. Blaine, are you willing to admit 
  that since there is no real evidence, then it is possible that the 
  scripture is not related to the anecdote?Perry




Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Dave Hansen
DAVEH:   Thanx Perry.  Hitting TT is about the first thing I did this 
morning after taking my meds!:-) 


Charles Perry Locke wrote:

Dave, sorry to hear about your ER trip, but glad to hear you are back 
home recuperating. Take it easy and don;t rush things. At our age we 
don't recuperate like we did hen we were 19!


I can hear you now...ohh, I feel terrible...quick, get a laptop...I 
have to check in wth TT! :-)


Perry


From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:12:24 -0700

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due 
to some other family complications, they allowed me to come home 
today.  I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main 
computer, but my son was able to get one of our old laptops 
configured for wireless, and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I 
don't (yet anyway) have access to my old files, so if anybody sent me 
questions, ask them again or you'll just have to wait until I can 
wade through my backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs!


   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short 
version is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I 
assumed I had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature 
fluctuations and getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of 
bed rest would allow it to run its course, that's pretty much all I 
did until Thursday when I discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery 
looking veins heading from my ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I 
was in ER getting antibiotics flowing into me, and a battery of tests 
that ultimately showed our worst fears were not realized, and I've 
probably get to keep the leg I use to kick cats through the 
uprights.   (I assume that will quell any sympathetic thoughts you 
might have, Izzy!):-)



   Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you 
have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Blaine, sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters 
unintentionally.


Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing to admit  that since 
there is no real evidence, then it is possible that the Isaiah scripture is 
not related to the anecdote?


Perry, AE6GQ



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:49:11 EDT


Perry,
Since you are converting to LDS beliefs, and giving up your job as
moderator, :) you are going to have to get with it regards believing via 
the
influence of the Holy Ghost, rather than the hard, tangible evidence you 
have in  the
past gotten used to demanding.  I for one rely on the evidence of  praying 
in

faith, then receiving the answer through the medium of the
spirit--Spirit-of-God direct to my receiver spirit.  But you do have to  
have your receiver in
tune with the transmitters, Perry, otherwise this sort of  evidence does 
not
work.  Just as when your radio is tuned off-station,  or not working at 
all, or
out of range of the signal, all you will recieve is  static.  I am afraid 
in

the past that  is all you have been receiving, for whatever reason--so you
might consider  getting a renewing of the spiritual receiver, is all I am 
saying.
New  spirits are extremely costly, they tell me, so that is obviously not 
an

option.   Take Care, Perry, and good luck with your newly acquired
religion!!  And, Congratulations on becoming One With The Saints!!!

Blainerb  (not baline, please!!)




n a message dated 6/13/2005 6:55:55 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Baline,

Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when  shown the evidence, even Thomas
believed.  We will only know for sure  when you present the facts and let 
me

evaluate them. The point is that if  there is no real evidence, then the
scripture is most likely not related  to the anecdote at all.

Blaine, are you willing to admit  that since there is no real evidence,
then it is possible that the  scripture is not related to the anecdote?

Perry






--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Dave Hansen
DAVEH:  Thanx Terry.  It was a strep infection that entered an old wound 
at my ankle.  Fortunately it had stayed on the surface, and had not got 
to the bone.


Terry Clifton wrote:

Sorry to hear that Dave.  Now you got us guessing.  Blood poison?  
Spider bite?  In any event I am praying for your recovery.

Terry

Dave Hansen wrote:

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due 
to some other family complications, they allowed me to come home 
today.  I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main 
computer, but my son was able to get one of our old laptops 
configured for wireless, and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I 
don't (yet anyway) have access to my old files, so if anybody sent me 
questions, ask them again or you'll just have to wait until I can 
wade through my backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs!


   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short 
version is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I 
assumed I had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature 
fluctuations and getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of 
bed rest would allow it to run its course, that's pretty much all I 
did until Thursday when I discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery 
looking veins heading from my ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I 
was in ER getting antibiotics flowing into me, and a battery of tests 
that ultimately showed our worst fears were not realized, and I've 
probably get to keep the leg I use to kick cats through the 
uprights.   (I assume that will quell any sympathetic thoughts you 
might have, Izzy!):-)



   Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you 
have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
Dave, I'm sorry to hear of your illness.  Was it a spider bite or what? If
it was from kicking cats we have living proof of God's judgement. :-) Get
well soon, Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:12 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due to 
some other family complications, they allowed me to come home today.  
I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main computer, but 
my son was able to get one of our old laptops configured for wireless, 
and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I don't (yet anyway) have access 
to my old files, so if anybody sent me questions, ask them again or 
you'll just have to wait until I can wade through my backlog of mail 
that is awaiting my return upstairs!

Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short version 
is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I assumed I 
had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature fluctuations and 
getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of bed rest would allow 
it to run its course, that's pretty much all I did until Thursday when I 
discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery looking veins heading from my 
ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I was in ER getting antibiotics 
flowing into me, and a battery of tests that ultimately showed our worst 
fears were not realized, and I've probably get to keep the leg I use to 
kick cats through the uprights.   (I assume that will quell any 
sympathetic thoughts you might have, Izzy!):-)


Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


[TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread Christine Miller
Well folks, I'll see you next Monday! The family's going on a beach vacation for a week. 

Judy, Izzy, Kevin -- hold the fortdown while I'm gone. :-) 


Blessings!
		Discover Yahoo! 
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!

RE: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








Lance, we already knew that everyone
believes something. What a news flash. The question on TT is Do you know the
real Jesus? (According to HIM.) If you do you are a capitalized Believer.
Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:05
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Everyone,
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







Once you understand 'belief', you come to understand that
everyone is (a 'believer')











Everyone's life exemplifies their belief.











Belief is so fundamental that little genuine engagement
takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. Examples: (1)CPL stating that
he is converting to LDS beliefs and, understands that he has to forfeit his
position as moderator but, would like to remain part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie
stating that she voted incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now
recognizes that she should have voted for the communist candidate.











Someone asked recently why we've 'seen' so little of David
and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing something more profitable than
hurling insults or, they are 'propigating their distinctive belief system on an
alternate location on the www.











Anyone who has read me over time is able to see the mediocre
level at which I think. However, I can see that no genuine exchanges have taken
place hereon in some time.Exceptions which prove the rule:The Bishop of
California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of Virginia (Jt). They really do try.











I'm expecting to be 'blown off' for my little rant but,
would be delighted to have someone say something regarding 'belief' .
B










Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Lance Muir
To:CPL-Have you ever SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED that Blaine's 'belief' might be
quite true and, that your's might be quite false? I'm not attempting to be
funny!

Why not address my post concerning 'belief systems'.?


- Original Message - 
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 13, 2005 10:22
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


 Blaine, sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters
 unintentionally.

 Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing to admit  that since
 there is no real evidence, then it is possible that the Isaiah scripture
is
 not related to the anecdote?

 Perry, AE6GQ


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:49:11 EDT
 
 
 Perry,
 Since you are converting to LDS beliefs, and giving up your job as
 moderator, :) you are going to have to get with it regards believing via
 the
 influence of the Holy Ghost, rather than the hard, tangible evidence you
 have in  the
 past gotten used to demanding.  I for one rely on the evidence of
praying
 in
 faith, then receiving the answer through the medium of the
 spirit--Spirit-of-God direct to my receiver spirit.  But you do have to
 have your receiver in
 tune with the transmitters, Perry, otherwise this sort of  evidence does
 not
 work.  Just as when your radio is tuned off-station,  or not working at
 all, or
 out of range of the signal, all you will recieve is  static.  I am afraid
 in
 the past that  is all you have been receiving, for whatever reason--so
you
 might consider  getting a renewing of the spiritual receiver, is all I am
 saying.
 New  spirits are extremely costly, they tell me, so that is obviously not
 an
 option.   Take Care, Perry, and good luck with your newly acquired
 religion!!  And, Congratulations on becoming One With The Saints!!!
 
 Blainerb  (not baline, please!!)
 
 
 
 
 n a message dated 6/13/2005 6:55:55 AM Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Baline,
 
 Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when  shown the evidence, even
Thomas
 believed.  We will only know for sure  when you present the facts and let
 me
 evaluate them. The point is that if  there is no real evidence, then the
 scripture is most likely not related  to the anecdote at all.
 
 Blaine, are you willing to admit  that since there is no real evidence,
 then it is possible that the  scripture is not related to the anecdote?
 
 Perry
 
 
 


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
Good thoughts, Perry.  Thanks. Iz

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:20 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

Lance, what I also hear is that we all choose to believe what we want to 
believe, regardless of the facts, or lack thereof.

   However, I believe that when a grain of truth is revealed, but not 
immediately accepted, a cognitive dissonance is created and stored away that

must eventually be resolved. This, I believe, is why people that, for 
example, become a Christian after denying the evidence for years, suddenly 
believe it ALL. The act of becoming a Christian resolves all of the small 
dissonant ideas they have stored away. So, I beleive that if Blaine ever 
decides to become a Christian, thus resolving all of the small dissonant 
facts he has stored away, he will be one of the greatest Christians ever. 
That is to say, when he takes all of the energy he expends defending a false

religion, and turns it toward defending the truth, watch out!

   I speak from my own experience. I got to the point where I could no 
longer deny the truth. All of the lies I told myself about why I could not 
accept Christianity vanished literally overnight, and all of the truths I 
had learned through the years, but not accepted, all became a viable part of

my belief.

Perry

From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:05:42 -0400

Even if, if, if, if you were absolutely correct, CPL, you know that he is
NOT prepared to acknowledge this. Please read my post on 'belief'. You are
as likely to be posting as a Mormon as he (Blaine) is likely to be posting
as what you deem to be a 'christian'.

If there is present on TT a six day young earth creationist, can you or
anyone on TT imagine them forfeiting this 'belief' in order to believe
'teleological evolutionism'? Impossible? No! Likely? Snowball's chance...


- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 13, 2005 08:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


  Baline,
 
 Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when shown the evidence, even
Thomas
  believed.  We will only know for sure when you present the facts and let
me
  evaluate them. The point is that if there is no real evidence, then the
  scripture is most likely not related to the anecdote at all.
 
 Blaine, are you willing to admit that since there is no real 
evidence,
  then it is possible that the scripture is not related to the anecdote?
 
  Perry
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
  Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:55:37 EDT
  
  
  
  Blaine:  Probably nothing that would satisfy your Doubting Thomas
  attitude, Perry.
  
  In a message dated 6/11/2005 10:34:43 PM Mountain Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  Yes, I  have heard that story, but that does not relate the event to 
the
  Isaiah  passage. We still have two separate stories with no ties other
than
  some  common words. One from scripture, one anecdotal. Do you have
anything
  that  actually links them?
  
  Perry
  
   From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   To:  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill  Cumorah
   Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:28:12  EDT
   
   
   
   Blaine:  Have you not read/heard the  story of  Martin Harris  taking
   characters copied from the  plates (by JS) to Professor Charles
Anthon,
  and
  
   first
   being told they were true characters, but then being  rebuffed  by 
him
  when
   he was
   told a portion of the plates  were sealed, and therefore could  not 
be
   dellivered to him for  translation?
   
   In a message dated 6/11/2005 8:18:53 PM Mountain  Standard Time,
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
   Blaine   wrote: The sealed portion has yet to be  translated, but
  contains
   the vision of all.   see Isaiah.   29:11
  
  
  
 
 
  --
  Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
 
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be 

RE: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








And visa-versa. Which is why those who
defend continued sin in the life of a Believer will certainly continue to sin.
And those who Believe they are free from sin, dont. Izzy

















Lance Muir wrote: 





Everyone's life exemplifies their belief.










RE: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
So smart of you, DaveH! I think the problem with JD is that he forgets his
medication before getting on TT.  :-) Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:11 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

DAVEH:   Thanx Perry.  Hitting TT is about the first thing I did this 
morning after taking my meds!:-) 

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

 Dave, sorry to hear about your ER trip, but glad to hear you are back 
 home recuperating. Take it easy and don;t rush things. At our age we 
 don't recuperate like we did hen we were 19!

 I can hear you now...ohh, I feel terrible...quick, get a laptop...I 
 have to check in wth TT! :-)

 Perry

 From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:12:24 -0700

 DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
 rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due 
 to some other family complications, they allowed me to come home 
 today.  I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main 
 computer, but my son was able to get one of our old laptops 
 configured for wireless, and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I 
 don't (yet anyway) have access to my old files, so if anybody sent me 
 questions, ask them again or you'll just have to wait until I can 
 wade through my backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs!

Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short 
 version is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I 
 assumed I had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature 
 fluctuations and getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of 
 bed rest would allow it to run its course, that's pretty much all I 
 did until Thursday when I discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery 
 looking veins heading from my ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I 
 was in ER getting antibiotics flowing into me, and a battery of tests 
 that ultimately showed our worst fears were not realized, and I've 
 probably get to keep the leg I use to kick cats through the 
 uprights.   (I assume that will quell any sympathetic thoughts you 
 might have, Izzy!):-)


Cheerio.Dave
 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
 may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you 
 have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
 may know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
 a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








Oh, yessomebody has to do it while
you evangelize the beaches!!! J Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine Miller
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:37
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Vacation







Well folks, I'll see you next Monday! The family's going on a beach
vacation for a week. 











Judy, Izzy, Kevin -- hold the fortdown while I'm gone. :-) 

















Blessings!









Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing  more. Check
it out!








Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke

Well, I thought I had addressed it, but apparently not. Let me try again.

I have in times past examined other belief systems in an attempt to find the 
truth. Some topically, some more seriously.


I have picked a standard for truth that I believe to be the true Word of 
God, and by that standard judge all things. If I am wrong, I guess I will go 
down with the ship, and may indeed pay for the errors of my choice. I have 
the promise of Christ that if I believe, then I am saved. If there is no 
Christ, then there is no salvation, and any other system is moot anyway.


Once I found the truth, I had no reason to explore any of the belief systems 
I previously examined. Their falseness stood out quite starkly. I bagan to 
study mormonism because once I became a Christian I heard that mormonism was 
a cult. Rather than just take that as fact I began to look into the mormon 
system rather deeply and, guess what! It is a cult. It falls in the face of 
scripture, the standard I have chosen by which to judge al things.


So, to answer your question directly, I have never seriously considered that 
Blaine's 'belief' might be quite true and my 'belief' might be quite false. 
That would be impossible for me to do given the faith I have in Christ, and 
what I know about mormonism. Raymond felt otherwise. I believe he said he 
used to be a Christian, but became a mormon. My guess is that he was looking 
for something more than merely the Christ. He evidently found it, and now 
lies in the same shallow as Blaine.


I do at times find some small facet of Mormonism that causes me to step back 
and take a second look at that fact...but even the mormons will tell 
you...every false religion has some truth mixed in with their lies.


BTW, I took your advice and got the Midnight Cry tape and viewed it. A 
perfect example of a difference of 'belief'.


Perry



From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:43:53 -0400

To:CPL-Have you ever SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED that Blaine's 'belief' might be
quite true and, that your's might be quite false? I'm not attempting to be
funny!

Why not address my post concerning 'belief systems'.?


- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 13, 2005 10:22
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


 Blaine, sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters
 unintentionally.

 Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing to admit  that since
 there is no real evidence, then it is possible that the Isaiah scripture
is
 not related to the anecdote?

 Perry, AE6GQ


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:49:11 EDT
 
 
 Perry,
 Since you are converting to LDS beliefs, and giving up your job as
 moderator, :) you are going to have to get with it regards believing 
via

 the
 influence of the Holy Ghost, rather than the hard, tangible evidence 
you

 have in  the
 past gotten used to demanding.  I for one rely on the evidence of
praying
 in
 faith, then receiving the answer through the medium of the
 spirit--Spirit-of-God direct to my receiver spirit.  But you do have to
 have your receiver in
 tune with the transmitters, Perry, otherwise this sort of  evidence 
does

 not
 work.  Just as when your radio is tuned off-station,  or not working at
 all, or
 out of range of the signal, all you will recieve is  static.  I am 
afraid

 in
 the past that  is all you have been receiving, for whatever reason--so
you
 might consider  getting a renewing of the spiritual receiver, is all I 
am

 saying.
 New  spirits are extremely costly, they tell me, so that is obviously 
not

 an
 option.   Take Care, Perry, and good luck with your newly acquired
 religion!!  And, Congratulations on becoming One With The Saints!!!
 
 Blainerb  (not baline, please!!)
 
 
 
 
 n a message dated 6/13/2005 6:55:55 AM Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Baline,
 
 Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when  shown the evidence, even
Thomas
 believed.  We will only know for sure  when you present the facts and 
let

 me
 evaluate them. The point is that if  there is no real evidence, then 
the

 scripture is most likely not related  to the anecdote at all.
 
 Blaine, are you willing to admit  that since there is no real evidence,
 then it is possible that the  scripture is not related to the anecdote?
 
 Perry
 
 
 


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will 

Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread Lance Muir



Iz:I do understand that this is NOT a news flash. 
But, you apparently failed to apprehend my meaning whereas Terry did not. What 
is it that enables your 'belief' that YOUR Jesus IS the real Jesus? Perhaps 
Blaine's Jesus is the 'real one.' Certainly he, and millions of Mormons believe 
this to be the case. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 13, 2005 10:44
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Everyone, 
  including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')
  
  
  Lance, we already 
  knew that everyone believes something. What a news flash. The 
  question on TT is Do you know the real Jesus? (According to HIM.) If you do 
  you are a capitalized “Believer”. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:05 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including 
  on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')
  
  
  Once you understand 'belief', you 
  come to understand that everyone is (a 
  'believer')
  
  
  
  Everyone's life exemplifies their 
  belief.
  
  
  
  Belief is so fundamental that 
  little genuine engagement takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. 
  Examples: (1)CPL stating that he is converting to LDS beliefs and, understands 
  that he has to forfeit his position as moderator but, would like to remain 
  part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie stating that she voted 
  incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now recognizes that she 
  should have voted for the communist 
  candidate.
  
  
  
  Someone asked recently why we've 
  'seen' so little of David and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing 
  something more profitable than hurling insults or, they are 'propigating their 
  distinctive belief system on an alternate location on the 
  www.
  
  
  
  Anyone who has read me over time 
  is able to see the mediocre level at which I think. However, I can see that no 
  genuine exchanges have taken place hereon in some time.Exceptions which prove 
  the rule:The Bishop of California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of Virginia (Jt). 
  They really do try.
  
  
  
  I'm expecting to be 'blown off' 
  for my little rant but, would be delighted to have someone say something 
  regarding 'belief' 
.B


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Dave Hansen



ShieldsFamily wrote:


Dave, I'm sorry to hear of your illness.  Was it a spider bite or what?

DAVEH:  Thanx Izzy...If it wasn't through an old skeeter bite gone 
bad, it was probably one of our two cats that scratched me while I was 
misusing your name!   ;-)



If
it was from kicking cats we have living proof of God's judgement. :-) Get
well soon, Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:12 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due to 
some other family complications, they allowed me to come home today.  
I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main computer, but 
my son was able to get one of our old laptops configured for wireless, 
and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I don't (yet anyway) have access 
to my old files, so if anybody sent me questions, ask them again or 
you'll just have to wait until I can wade through my backlog of mail 
that is awaiting my return upstairs!


   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short version 
is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I assumed I 
had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature fluctuations and 
getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of bed rest would allow 
it to run its course, that's pretty much all I did until Thursday when I 
discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery looking veins heading from my 
ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I was in ER getting antibiotics 
flowing into me, and a battery of tests that ultimately showed our worst 
fears were not realized, and I've probably get to keep the leg I use to 
kick cats through the uprights.   (I assume that will quell any 
sympathetic thoughts you might have, Izzy!):-)



   Cheerio.Dave
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Dave Hansen




DAVEH: Knowing the nature of TT, it behooved me to take a double dose
of pain killer before reading the TT posts.

ShieldsFamily wrote:

  So smart of you, DaveH! I think the problem with JD is that he forgets his
medication before getting on TT.  :-) Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:11 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

DAVEH:   Thanx Perry.  Hitting TT is about the first thing I did this 
morning after taking my meds!:-) 

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

  
  
Dave, sorry to hear about your ER trip, but glad to hear you are back 
home recuperating. Take it easy and don;t rush things. At our age we 
don't recuperate like we did hen we were 19!

I can hear you now..."ohh, I feel terrible...quick, get a laptop...I 
have to check in wth TT!" :-)

Perry



  From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:12:24 -0700

DAVEH:  Hi all.Sorry to be gone for a bit last week.  I became 
rather ill on Monday night, and by Thursday ended up in the ER.  Due 
to some other family complications, they allowed me to come home 
today.  I'm too weak to be climbing the stairs to access my main 
computer, but my son was able to get one of our old laptops 
configured for wireless, and hence I'm back onlinesorta.   I 
don't (yet anyway) have access to my old files, so if anybody sent me 
questions, ask them again or you'll just have to wait until I can 
wade through my backlog of mail that is awaiting my return upstairs!

   Anyway, for those who are curious to the details, the short 
version is that because I was unable to get a flu shot last winter, I 
assumed I had a bad case of the flu due to wild temperature 
fluctuations and getting the shakes and chills.  Assuming a lot of 
bed rest would allow it to run its course, that's pretty much all I 
did until Thursday when I discovered my leg had a lot of red spidery 
looking veins heading from my ankle to my knee.   A half hour later I 
was in ER getting antibiotics flowing into me, and a battery of tests 
that ultimately showed our worst fears were not realized, and I've 
probably get to keep the leg I use to kick cats through the 
uprights.   (I assume that will quell any sympathetic thoughts you 
might have, Izzy!):-)


   Cheerio.Dave
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you 
have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
  



--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you 
may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



  
  --
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


  





RE: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








Like Perry, I only rely on the Bible to
know Jesus. The mormons have to have extra-biblical evidence for their
construct of Jesus. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:32
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone,
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







Iz:I do understand that this is NOT a news flash. But, you
apparently failed to apprehend my meaning whereas Terry did not. What is it
that enables your 'belief' that YOUR Jesus IS the real Jesus? Perhaps Blaine's Jesus is the
'real one.' Certainly he, and millions of Mormons believe this to be the case. 







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 13, 2005
10:44





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')









Lance, we already knew that everyone
believes something. What a news flash. The question on TT is Do you
know the real Jesus? (According to HIM.) If you do you are a capitalized
Believer. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:05
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Everyone,
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







Once you understand 'belief', you come to understand that
everyone is (a 'believer')











Everyone's life exemplifies their belief.











Belief is so fundamental that little genuine engagement
takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. Examples: (1)CPL stating that
he is converting to LDS beliefs and, understands that he has to forfeit his
position as moderator but, would like to remain part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie stating
that she voted incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now
recognizes that she should have voted for the communist candidate.











Someone asked recently why we've 'seen' so little of David
and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing something more profitable than
hurling insults or, they are 'propigating their distinctive belief system on an
alternate location on the www.











Anyone who has read me over time is able to see the mediocre
level at which I think. However, I can see that no genuine exchanges have taken
place hereon in some time.Exceptions which prove the rule:The Bishop of
California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of Virginia (Jt). They really do try.











I'm expecting to be 'blown off' for my little rant but,
would be delighted to have someone say something regarding 'belief' .
B












Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Blainerb473




Blaine: Well, that's where the problem is, Perry. You see, 
there is real evidence. You are just not in tune with the spiritual 
channel that deals with this evidence. I can see that plainly. You 
are looking for an out, and anything you find, small or large,is good 
enough--as long as it furnishes you with a"reason" to remain the 
skeptic. I try to give you straws of hope and light, but you for some 
reason never glom onto them the way you do the anti-stuff.You 
apparently don't even question the anti-stuff, at least not as assiduously as 
when you are looking at official Mormon material. It tells you what your 
itching ears want to hear, so . . . end of further investigation. 
Hmmm, the spirit tells me that it will not always strive with man . . .
Blaine


In a message dated 6/13/2005 8:30:21 AM Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters 
  unintentionally.Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing 
  to admit that since there is no real evidence, then it is possible 
  that the Isaiah scripture is not related to the anecdote?Perry, 
  AE6GQ




Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke

Blaine,

  I will assume that your answer is no, that you are not willing  to admit  
that since there is no real evidence, then it is possible  that the Isaiah 
scripture is not related to the anecdote.


  From your answer, then I will also assume that when you have no evidence 
linking a Biblical text to a mormon anecdote or doctrine, that you receive a 
spiritual message telling you it is connected. Is that right?


  DaveH, is that the same for you? Do you also determine if a Biblical 
passage and a mormon anecdote or doctrine are linked by receiving a 
spiritual message, or do you look for actual tangible textual or historical 
evidence?


Perry


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:19:42 EDT


Blaine:  Well, that's where the problem is, Perry.  You see,  there is real
evidence.  You are just not in tune with the spiritual  channel that deals 
with

this evidence.  I can see that plainly.  You  are looking for an out, and
anything you find, small or large, is good  enough--as long as it furnishes 
you
with a reason to remain  the  skeptic.  I try to give you straws of hope 
and

light, but you for some  reason never glom onto them the way you do the
anti-stuff.  You  apparently don't even question the anti-stuff, at least 
not as
assiduously as  when you are looking at official Mormon material.  It tells 
you
what your  itching ears want to hear, so . . .  end of further 
investigation.

Hmmm, the spirit tells me that it will not always strive with man . . .
Blaine


In a message dated 6/13/2005 8:30:21 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Blaine,  sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters
unintentionally.

Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing  to admit  that since
there is no real evidence, then it is possible  that the Isaiah scripture 
is

not related to the anecdote?

Perry,  AE6GQ







--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Blaine, in the Doctrine and Covenants, section 117:12 JS wrote the following 
prophecy:


And again, I say unto you, I remember my servant Oliver Granger; behold, 
verily I say unto him that his name shall be had in sacred remembrance from 
generation to generation, forever and ever, saith the Lord.


Do you know who Oliver Granger is? If not, please ask your spritual source, 
because I have been wanting to know this for a long time. Let me know what 
he/she says.


Thanks,
Perry


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:19:42 EDT


Blaine:  Well, that's where the problem is, Perry.  You see,  there is real
evidence.  You are just not in tune with the spiritual  channel that deals 
with

this evidence.  I can see that plainly.  You  are looking for an out, and
anything you find, small or large, is good  enough--as long as it furnishes 
you
with a reason to remain  the  skeptic.  I try to give you straws of hope 
and

light, but you for some  reason never glom onto them the way you do the
anti-stuff.  You  apparently don't even question the anti-stuff, at least 
not as
assiduously as  when you are looking at official Mormon material.  It tells 
you
what your  itching ears want to hear, so . . .  end of further 
investigation.

Hmmm, the spirit tells me that it will not always strive with man . . .
Blaine


In a message dated 6/13/2005 8:30:21 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Blaine,  sorry about the typo...sometimes I transpose letters
unintentionally.

Transmitters, receivers, whatever. Are you willing  to admit  that since
there is no real evidence, then it is possible  that the Isaiah scripture 
is

not related to the anecdote?

Perry,  AE6GQ







--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread Judy Taylor



Will do Christine,
Hope yourfamily vacation is a blessing to each one of you,
judyt

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Well folks, I'll see you next Monday! The family's going on a beach 
  vacation for a week. 
  
  Judy, Izzy, Kevin -- hold the fortdown while I'm gone. :-) 
  
  
  Blessings!
  
  
  Discover Yahoo!Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing  more. Check 
  it out!
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread Lance Muir



And..IFF the so-called 'extra-biblical' 
evidence is indeed a true revelation from God..I'm sure you note that your 
'framing' of your 'truth' is entirely self-serving.(as is his) Thus, one might 
say, it's a draw. You might be believing in the 'real' Jesus 
or...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 13, 2005 11:55
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Everyone, 
  including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')
  
  
  Like Perry, I only 
  rely on the Bible to know Jesus. The mormons have to have extra-biblical 
  evidence for their construct of Jesus. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:32 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, 
  including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')
  
  
  Iz:I do understand that this is 
  NOT a news flash. But, you apparently failed to apprehend my meaning whereas 
  Terry did not. What is it that enables your 'belief' that YOUR Jesus IS the 
  real Jesus? Perhaps Blaine's Jesus is the 'real one.' Certainly 
  he, and millions of Mormons believe this to be the case. 
  
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


Sent: June 
13, 2005 10:44

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 
'b')


Lance, we already 
knew that everyone believes something. What a news flash. The 
question on TT is Do you know the real Jesus? (According to HIM.) If you do 
you are a capitalized “Believer”. Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:05 
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Everyone, 
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')


Once you understand 'belief', 
you come to understand that everyone is (a 
'believer')



Everyone's life exemplifies 
their belief.



Belief is so fundamental that 
little genuine engagement takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. 
Examples: (1)CPL stating that he is converting to LDS beliefs and, 
understands that he has to forfeit his position as moderator but, would like 
to remain part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie stating 
that she voted incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now 
recognizes that she should have voted for the communist 
candidate.



Someone asked recently why we've 
'seen' so little of David and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing 
something more profitable than hurling insults or, they are 'propigating 
their distinctive belief system on an alternate location on the 
www.



Anyone who has read me over time 
is able to see the mediocre level at which I think. However, I can see that 
no genuine exchanges have taken place hereon in some time.Exceptions which 
prove the rule:The Bishop of California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of 
Virginia (Jt). They really do try.



I'm expecting to be 'blown off' 
for my little rant but, would be delighted to have someone say something 
regarding 'belief' 
  .B


RE: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








The problem is that the mormon
extra-biblical evidence is in clear conflict with the Biblical evidence. So
they are wrong. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 10:54
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone,
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







And..IFF the so-called 'extra-biblical' evidence is
indeed a true revelation from God..I'm sure you note that your 'framing' of
your 'truth' is entirely self-serving.(as is his) Thus, one might say, it's a
draw. You might be believing in the 'real' Jesus or...







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 13, 2005
11:55





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')









Like Perry, I only rely on the Bible to
know Jesus. The mormons have to have extra-biblical evidence for their
construct of Jesus. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:32
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone,
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







Iz:I do understand that this is NOT a news flash. But, you
apparently failed to apprehend my meaning whereas Terry did not. What is it
that enables your 'belief' that YOUR Jesus IS the real Jesus? Perhaps Blaine's Jesus is the
'real one.' Certainly he, and millions of Mormons believe this to be the case. 







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 13, 2005
10:44





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')









Lance, we already knew that everyone
believes something. What a news flash. The question on TT is Do you
know the real Jesus? (According to HIM.) If you do you are a capitalized
Believer. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:05
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Everyone,
including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







Once you understand 'belief', you come to understand that
everyone is (a 'believer')











Everyone's life exemplifies their belief.











Belief is so fundamental that little genuine engagement
takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. Examples: (1)CPL stating that
he is converting to LDS beliefs and, understands that he has to forfeit his
position as moderator but, would like to remain part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie
stating that she voted incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now
recognizes that she should have voted for the communist candidate.











Someone asked recently why we've 'seen' so little of David
and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing something more profitable than
hurling insults or, they are 'propigating their distinctive belief system on an
alternate location on the www.











Anyone who has read me over time is able to see the mediocre
level at which I think. However, I can see that no genuine exchanges have taken
place hereon in some time.Exceptions which prove the rule:The Bishop of
California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of Virginia (Jt). They really do try.











I'm expecting to be 'blown off' for my little rant but,
would be delighted to have someone say something regarding 'belief' .
B














Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread Judy Taylor





Sure 
everyone is a 'believer' - the questionthen is what are they 
believing?. 
Do 
they believe and follow the truth or the lie? 
judyt

  
  
  Once you understand 'belief', you 
  come to understand that everyone is (a 
  'believer')
  
  
  
  Everyone's life exemplifies their 
  belief.
  
  
  
  Belief is so fundamental that 
  little genuine engagement takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. 
  Examples: (1)CPL stating that he is converting to LDS beliefs and, understands 
  that he has to forfeit his position as moderator but, would like to remain 
  part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie stating that she voted 
  incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now recognizes that she 
  should have voted for the communist 
  candidate.
  
  
  
  Someone asked recently why we've 
  'seen' so little of David and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing 
  something more profitable than hurling insults or, they are 'propigating their 
  distinctive belief system on an alternate location on the 
  www.
  
  
  
  Anyone who has read me over time 
  is able to see the mediocre level at which I think. However, I can see that no 
  genuine exchanges have taken place hereon in some time.Exceptions which prove 
  the rule:The Bishop of California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of Virginia (Jt). 
  They really do try.
  
  
  
  I'm expecting to be 'blown off' 
  for my little rant but, would be delighted to have someone say something 
  regarding 'belief' .B
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise

Don't forget the poor and the orphans and widows !!!

-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:51:37 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation






Oh, yes?somebody has to do it while you evangelize the beaches!!! J Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine MillerSent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:37 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Vacation


Well folks, I'll see you next Monday! The family's going on a beach vacation for a week. 



Judy, Izzy, Kevin -- hold the fortdown while I'm gone. :-) 





Blessings!



Discover Yahoo!Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing  more. Check it out!


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise




I would think that we all choose to believe whatever based upon our view of the credibility of the "truth source" closest to us in terms of time and space. I mean,if Blaine was "born a Mormon,' his first source of "truth" would be his parents. Who's he going to believe -- his parents or some guy standing cross the street waving underwear.And, by the time he gets to a free thinking age, he already has such a systematize faith that little will prevail against it. THAT'S NORMAL. Blaine may or not believe this -- but  THANK GOD WE DO NOT HAVE TO BE RIGHT. 

JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke cpl2602@hotmail.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:20:26 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


Lance, what I also hear is that we all choose to believe what we want to believe, regardless of the facts, or lack thereof. However, I believe that when a grain of truth is revealed, but not immediately accepted, a cognitive dissonance is created and stored away that must eventually be resolved. This, I believe, is why people that, for example, become a Christian after denying the evidence for years, suddenly believe it ALL. The act of becoming a Christian resolves all of the small dissonant ideas they have stored away. So, I beleive that if Blaine ever decides to become a Christian, thus resolving all of the small dissonant facts he has stored away, he will be one of the greatest Christians ever. That is to say, when he takes all of the energy he expends defending a false religion, and turns it toward defending the truth, watch out! I speak from my own experience. 
I got to the point where I could no longer deny the truth. All of the lies I told myself about why I could not accept Christianity vanished literally overnight, and all of the truths I had learned through the years, but not accepted, all became a viable part of my belief.PerryFrom: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill CumorahDate: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:05:42 -0400Even if, if, if, if you were absolutely correct, CPL, you know that he isNOT prepared to acknowledge this. Please read my post on 'belief'. You areas likely to be posting as a Mormon as he (Blaine) is likely to be posting
t;as what you deem to be a 'christian'.If there is present on TT a six day young earth creationist, can you oranyone on TT imagine them forfeiting this 'belief' in order to believe'teleological evolutionism'? Impossible? No! Likely? Snowball's chance...- Original Message -From: "Charles Perry Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: June 13, 2005 08:55Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah  Baline,   Sometimes it is 
right to doubt. But, when shown the evidence, evenThomas  believed. We will only know for sure when you present the facts and letme  evaluate them. The point is that if there is no real evidence, then the  scripture is most likely not related to the anecdote at all.   Blaine, are you willing to admit that since there is no real evidence,  then it is possible that the scripture is not related to the anecdote?   Perry   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah  Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:55:37 EDT
sp;Blaine: Probably nothing that would satisfy your "Doubting Thomas"  attitude, Perry.In a message dated 6/11/2005 10:34:43 PM Mountain Standard Time,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Yes, I have heard that story, but that does not relate the event to the  Isaiah passage. We still have two separate stories with no ties otherthan  some common words. One from scripture, one anecdotal. Do you haveanything  that actually links them?Perry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah   Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:28:12 EDTBlaine: Have you not read/heard the story of Martin Harris taking   characters copied from the plates (by JS) to Professor CharlesAnthon,  and first   being told they were true characters, but then being rebuffed by him  when   he was   told a portion of the plates were sealed, and therefore could not be   dellivered to him for translation?  In a message dated 6/11/2005 8:18:53 PM Mountain Standard Time,   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:  Blaine wrote: The sealed portion has yet to be translated, but  contains   "the vision of all." see Isaiah. 29:11  --  "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you mayknow how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have afriend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.--"Let your speech 

Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise




Maybe we could look at it this way: there is "truth" that is critically impoartant and truth that is not.The fact that I have red hair is not an important truth --- and growing less important with the passing of time, I might add. 

But how I treat my wife is another matter, entirely. 


At an accident scene, witnesses may disagree upon the true events of the accident -- that does not mean there was no accident !! 

If someone calls me on the phone and asks for "Papa John," I could care less if their description of me is accurate or not. I do not understand why we have to think correctly about the who of God (His nature, His trinity, His wrath and so on) . Just because we have some of this wrong does not mean that we are dealing with a differenct God, does it ? 

If not , why not. 

God does not exist as figment of my thinking and understanding. 

Let's compare Blaine and - ahhh -- alright ME 

We think very differently when it comes to religion. Does that mean that we are serving two different Gods? There is rational, conceptual truth. We are not close on that one. But what has been the effect of this Jesus each of us claim to serve? Are we better people because of this influence? Have each of us grown in a spiritual sense. Is there no righteous progress in one -- only in the other? 

Some truth matters -- some simply keeps us apart. 



JD


-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:15:20 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Everyone, including on TT, a 'believer' (small 'b')







Sure everyone is a 'believer' - the questionthen is what are they believing?. 
Do they believe and follow the truth or the lie? judyt



Once you understand 'belief', you come to understand that everyone is (a 'believer')



Everyone's life exemplifies their belief.



Belief is so fundamental that little genuine engagement takes place between polarized 'belief-systems'. Examples: (1)CPL stating that he is converting to LDS beliefs and, understands that he has to forfeit his position as moderator but, would like to remain part of the 'conversation'.(2) Izzie stating that she voted incorrectly in the last Presidential election. She now recognizes that she should have voted for the communist candidate.



Someone asked recently why we've 'seen' so little of David and Christine lately. IMO they are either doing something more profitable than hurling insults or, they are 'propigating their distinctive belief system on an alternate location on the www.



Anyone who has read me over time is able to see the mediocre level at which I think. However, I can see that no genuine exchanges have taken place hereon in some time.Exceptions which prove the rule:The Bishop of California (JD) and The Bishop(ess?) of Virginia (Jt). They really do try.



I'm expecting to be 'blown off' for my little rant but, would be delighted to have someone say something regarding 'belief' .B



Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke

John,

  How far NOT RIGHT is too far NOT RIGHT?  It seems that here is a 
continuum of belief in people, ranging from the totally unbelieving atheist 
to the very devout believing Chrsitian. Or on another scale, from the 
Satanist to the Christian. Do you think that ALL will be saved regardless of 
how NOT RIGHT they are? Where will the line be drawn? There is no almost 
saved, or saved a little, or saved more than me...there is only saved 
and unsaved. What will detrmine where the line will be drawn? Can you know 
on which side of the line you fall? Can you be deceived into thinking that 
you are on the RIGHT side of the line when, indeed, you are on the NOT 
RIGHT side of the line?


Perry


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:21:39 -0400




I would think that we all choose to believe whatever based upon our view of 
the credibility of the truth source closest to us in terms of time and 
space.I mean, if Blaine was born a Mormon,'  his first source of 
truth would be his parents.  Who's he going to believe  --  his parents 
or some guy standing cross the street waving underwear.  And, by the time 
he gets to a free thinking age,  he already has such a systematize faith 
that little will prevail against it.   THAT'S NORMAL.Blaine may or not 
believe this -- but THANK GOD WE DO NOT HAVE TO BE 
RIGHT.


JD

-Original Message-
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:20:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


Lance, what I also hear is that we all choose to believe what we want to 
believe, regardless of the facts, or lack thereof.


  However, I believe that when a grain of truth is revealed, but not 
immediately accepted, a cognitive dissonance is created and stored away 
that must eventually be resolved. This, I believe, is why people that, for 
example, become a Christian after denying the evidence for years, suddenly 
believe it ALL. The act of becoming a Christian resolves all of the small 
dissonant ideas they have stored away. So, I beleive that if Blaine ever 
decides to become a Christian, thus resolving all of the small dissonant 
facts he has stored away, he will be one of the greatest Christians ever. 
That is to say, when he takes all of the energy he expends defending a 
false religion, and turns it toward defending the truth, watch out!


  I speak from my own experience. I got to the point where I could no 
longer deny the truth. All of the lies I told myself about why I could not 
accept Christianity vanished literally overnight, and all of the truths I 
had learned through the years, but not accepted, all became a viable part 
of my belief.


Perry

From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:05:42 -0400

Even if, if, if, if you were absolutely correct, CPL, you know that he is
NOT prepared to acknowledge this. Please read my post on 'belief'. You 
are
as likely to be posting as a Mormon as he (Blaine) is likely to be 
posting

as what you deem to be a 'christian'.

If there is present on TT a six day young earth creationist, can you or
anyone on TT imagine them forfeiting this 'belief' in order to believe
'teleological evolutionism'? Impossible? No! Likely? Snowball's chance...


- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 13, 2005 08:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


  Baline,
 
  Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when shown the evidence, even
Thomas
  believed. We will only know for sure when you present the facts and 
let

me
  evaluate them. The point is that if there is no real evidence, then 
the

  scripture is most likely not related to the anecdote at all.
 
  Blaine, are you willing to admit that since there is no real 
evidence,

  then it is possible that the scripture is not related to the anecdote?
 
  Perry
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
  Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:55:37 EDT
  
  
  
  Blaine: Probably nothing that would satisfy your Doubting Thomas
  attitude, Perry.
  
  In a message dated 6/11/2005 10:34:43 PM Mountain Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  Yes, I have heard that story, but that does not relate the event to 
the

  Isaiah passage. We still have two separate stories with no ties other
than
  some common words. One from scripture, one anecdotal. Do you have
anything
  that actually links them?
  
  Perry
  
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
   Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:28:12 EDT
   
   
   
   

RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread ShieldsFamily








Im sure you never do anything other
than that yourself, JD. 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:14
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Vacation











Don't forget the poor and the orphans and widows
!!!











-Original Message-
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:51:37 -0500
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation







Oh, yes?somebody has to do it while you
evangelize the beaches!!! J Izzy



















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine Miller
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:37
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Vacation















Well folks, I'll see you next Monday! The family's going on a beach
vacation for a week. 



















Judy, Izzy, Kevin -- hold the fortdown while I'm gone. :-) 





























Blessings!













Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing  more. Check it out!
















Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Blainerb473





Blaine: Oliver Granger got his name in the DC, and for that 
reason alone, he will fulfill the prophecy. Do you see my name in the 
DC? Nope. Do you see Dave's name in the DC? 
Nope. With twelve going on thirteen million readers of the DC, surely 
many of them will note this prophecy, especially since you AND your fellow 
street preachers have made such an effort to point his low profile out. By 
now, I imagine I have heard or read his name at least a dozen times. At 
the present rate, Oliver Granger cannot help but become almost as famous as 
Joseph Smith andeasily as famous asBrigham Young. 

In a message dated 6/13/2005 10:42:57 AM Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  in the Doctrine and Covenants, section 117:12 JS wrote the following 
  "prophecy":"And again, I say unto you, I remember my servant 
  Oliver Granger; behold, verily I say unto him that his name shall be had 
  in sacred remembrance from generation to generation, forever and ever, 
  saith the Lord."Do you know who Oliver Granger is? If not, please ask 
  your spritual source, because I have been wanting to know this for a long 
  time. Let me know what he/she 
says.Thanks,Perry




Re: [TruthTalk] Dead to Sin

2005-06-13 Thread ttxpress



yep..

..areason 
Christians are not 'perfect'emerges in Petrine thought (1., 
ch5)whereit's exhorted 'humble yourselves' (plural--no 
exceptions)

to Peter, 'conceit' 
is chronic

chronic 
conceit 
occurs in Christ as Petrine thought supposes,germane to'humble 
yourselves'

humility--confronting chronic conceit 'under the mighty hand of 
God'--is elemental to'suffering' (to Peter alsoin 1, 
ch.5)

Petrine humility and suffering todayoccur in 
eschatological tension only withJC's life style--and, the poet, 
below,BobDylan, is conscious of JC among us, JC the absolute 
prerequisite (for) humility

also, for 
Dylan,'suffering' with Peter and hisadherants, in Christ,is 
notEvil alongthe mentalaxisof Good,thus Dylan 
(correspondingly)defiesphilosophical dualism, which, in these 
lyrics,he sees as the bedrock of chronic conceit

yep, like Peter, he 
'sees' that..

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:08:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  ..humility is the blessing we receive from God's [constant] 
  gracious intervention.
  
  
  
  ==
  
  There's a whole 
  lot of people suffering tonightFrom the _disease of conceit_.Whole lot 
  of people struggling tonightFrom the disease of conceit.Comes right 
  down the highway,Straight down the line,Rips into your 
  sensesThrough your body and your mind.Nothing about it that's 
  sweet,The disease of conceit.
  
  There's a whole 
  lot of hearts breaking tonightFrom the disease of conceit,Whole lot of 
  hearts shaking tonightFrom the disease of conceit.Steps into your 
  room,Eats your soul,Over your sensesYou have no control.Ain't 
  nothing too discreetAbout of disease of conceit.
  
  There's a whole 
  lot of people dying tonightFrom the disease of conceit,Whole lot of 
  people crying tonightFrom the disease of conceit,Comes right out of 
  nowhereAnd you're down for the countFrom the outside world,The 
  pressure will mount,Turn you into a piece of meat,The disease of 
  conceit.
  
  Conceit is a 
  diseaseThat the doctors got no cureThey've done a lot of research on 
  itBut what it is, they're still not sure
  
  There's a whole 
  lot of people in trouble tonightFrom the disease of conceit,Whole lot 
  of people seeing double tonightFrom the disease of conceit,Give ya 
  delusions of grandeurAnd a evil eyeGive you idea thatYou're too 
  good to die,Then they bury you from your head to your feetFrom the 
  disease of conceit.Bob Dylan 
  ::Copyright © 1989 Special Rider Music 
  
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 6/13/2005 2:09:44 PM Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I 
  would think that we all choose to believe whatever based upon our view of 
  the credibility of the "truth source" closest to us in terms of time 
  and space.  I mean, if Blaine was "born a 
  Mormon,' his first source of "truth" would be his parents. 
  Who's he going to believe -- his parents or some guy 
  standing cross the street waving underwear. And, by the time 
  he gets to a free thinking age, he already has such a 
  systematize faith that little will prevail against it. 
  THAT'S NORMAL.  Blaine may or not believe this -- but 
    THANK GOD WE DO NOT HAVE TO BE 
  RIGHT.JD

Blaine: Good, JD. I agree parents are critical in what 
children end up believing. I am very fortunate to have had good advice and 
guidance from my mom and dad. My grandpa was also very 
influential, mostly by his example. He served two missions (LDS) to 
Norway, and another one to Spokane, Washington. He recorded many 
miraculous healings, casting out of devils, etc. in his writings. He was a 
Judge in regular life, and often required those he saw in court to go to church, 
the denomination being left to them. He was always in favor of religious 
training, regardless of the belief system. Any belief that advocates 
Christian values, he felt, was better than the value systems that got people 
into trouble with the law. Nevertheless, he lived and died by the LDS 
doctrines. 


Re: [TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise

This type of response issurprisingly typical for the Fundies of this forum .For the record (but who actually reads the record), I have made it clear that I have not done enough regarding the "pouring myself out for the hungry .." I see no advantage in saying over and over again "yeah, but you do it too." When I am wrong, in most cases (no one is perfect) I say "understood," swallow hard, and recommit to a different approach. 

Remember Matt 7:1ff. 

JD








---0-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:19:13 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation






I?m sure you never do anything other than that yourself, JD. 





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:14 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Vacation




Don't forget the poor and the orphans and widows !!!



-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:51:37 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation


Oh, yes?somebody has to do it while you evangelize the beaches!!! J Izzy







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine MillerSent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:37 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Vacation




Well folks, I'll see you next Monday! The family's going on a beach vacation for a week. 





Judy, Izzy, Kevin -- hold the fortdown while I'm gone. :-) 








Blessings!




Discover Yahoo!Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing  more. Check it out!


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise

I don't follow along with this thread as much as I should. Is Oliver Granger a real character or is hesomeone who will receive the name "Oliver Granger?" I am not sure (emphasis on "not sure") that youhave answered Perry's question. Perhaps you did -- and the answer is bound to the questions I raise as I preview your response. 

JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:34:29 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah





Blaine: Oliver Granger got his name in the DC, and for that reason alone, he will fulfill the prophecy. Do you see my name in the DC? Nope. Do you see Dave's name in the DC? Nope. With twelve going on thirteen million readers of the DC, surely many of them will note this prophecy, especially since you AND your fellow street preachers have made such an effort to point his low profile out. By now, I imagine I have heard or read his name at least a dozen times. At the present rate, Oliver Granger cannot help but become almost as famous as Joseph Smith andeasily as famous asBrigham Young. 

In a message dated 6/13/2005 10:42:57 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, in the Doctrine and Covenants, section 117:12 JS wrote the following "prophecy":"And again, I say unto you, I remember my servant Oliver Granger; behold, verily I say unto him that his name shall be had in sacred remembrance from generation to generation, forever and ever, saith the Lord."Do you know who Oliver Granger is? If not, please ask your spritual source, because I have been wanting to know this for a long time. Let me know what he/she says.Thanks,Perry




Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread knpraise

At some point on that continuumis a line that separatesgrowth from regression.At each end of this continuum are two very different characters: one is serving self apart from God, knowingly and deliberately (full blown rebellion) His end is destruction (self destruction) He is "dead already." At the other end the image of Christ, Each is at the END of this continuum. Each is tied to the other, in scriptures (and you know what scripture I am going to quote) i.e. Romans 7:25 and associated scripture and Eph 4: 20-24. 

Almost sounds as though I am on my way to answering your question, doesn't it? Well, I know this "continuum" exists. I know that unless and until I am "fully rebellious," the good that God would do is present in my life to some degree. I know, also, that unless and until I have fully achieved the very image of Christ, that which does me personal harm is, likewise, present to some degree. 

I believe that I do not know the spiritual state ("saved" or "lost") of any other person other than myself, and that knowledge (my personal destiny) is an act of faith. 

In short -- I don't know. 

JD


-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke cpl2602@hotmail.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:09:18 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah


John, How far "NOT RIGHT" is too far "NOT RIGHT"? It seems that here is a continuum of belief in people, ranging from the totally unbelieving atheist to the very devout believing Chrsitian. Or on another scale, from the Satanist to the Christian. Do you think that ALL will be saved regardless of how "NOT RIGHT" they are? Where will the line be drawn? There is no "almost saved", or "saved a little", or "saved more than me"...there is only saved and unsaved. What will detrmine where the line will be drawn? Can you know on which side of the line you fall? Can you be deceived into thinking that you are on the "RIGHT" side of the line when, indeed, you are on the "NOT RIGHT" side of the line?PerryFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: <
A href="">TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill CumorahDate: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:21:39 -0400I would think that we all choose to believe whatever based upon our view of the credibility of the "truth source" closest to us in terms of time and space. I mean, if Blaine was "born a Mormon,' his first source of "truth" would be his parents. Who's he going to believe -- his parents or some guy standing cross the street waving underwear. And, by the time he gets to a free thinking age, he already has such a systematize faith that little will prevail against it. THAT'S NORMAL. Blaine may or not believe this -- but  THANK GOD WE DO NOT HAVE TO BE RIGHT.JD&
gt;-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:20:26 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill CumorahLance, what I also hear is that we all choose to believe what we want to believe, regardless of the facts, or lack thereof. However, I believe that when a grain of truth is revealed, but not immediately accepted, a cognitive dissonance is created and stored away that must eventually be resolved. This, I believe, is why people that, for example, become a Christian after denying the evidence for years, suddenly believe it ALL. The act of becoming a Christian resolves all of the small dissonant ideas they have stored away. So, I beleive that if Blaine ever decides to becom
e a Christian, thus resolving all of the small dissonant facts he has stored away, he will be one of the greatest Christians ever. That is to say, when he takes all of the energy he expends defending a false religion, and turns it toward defending the truth, watch out! I speak from my own experience. I got to the point where I could no longer deny the truth. All of the lies I told myself about why I could not accept Christianity vanished literally overnight, and all of the truths I had learned through the years, but not accepted, all became a viable part of my belief.Perry From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk
] Hill Cumorah Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:05:42 -0400  Even if, if, if, if you were absolutely correct, CPL, you know that he is NOT prepared to acknowledge this. Please read my post on 'belief'. You are as likely to be posting as a Mormon as he (Blaine) is likely to be posting as what you deem to be a 'christian'.  If there is present on TT a six day young earth creationist, can you or anyone on TT imagine them forfeiting this 'belief' in order to believe 'teleological evolutionism'? Impossible? No! Likely? Snowball's chance...   - Original Me
ssage - From: "Charles Perry Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 13, 2005 08:55 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah Baline, Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when shown 

RE: [TruthTalk] Vacation

2005-06-13 Thread ttxpress




anyone into problem 
solving?

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:48:28 -0500 "ShieldsFamily":


  
  [the problem 
  with going on vacation:]
  
  ..[acc to Izzy] the 
  Miller’s[are] going to the beach instead of remembering the orphans and 
  widows.
  ||
  
  [the solution to going on 
  vacation:]
  
  JD 
  writes:
  "..(no one is 
  perfect) I..recommit [myself] to a different 
  approach." 
  
  
  
  
  
  ||


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke

Blaine,

  Thanks for your spiritual insight into this prophecy. So, if I understand 
this correctly, the REAL meaning of this prophecy is that Oliver Granger's 
name would be remembered from generation to generation by virtue of the fact 
that detractors of mormonism would point it out as false prophecy, thus 
fulfilling the prophecy? In what way is that in sacred rememberance?


  Well, Blaine, I guess I have to agree with you on a point you made 
earlier. I definitely am not tuned in to your spiritual frequency.


  BTW, I am proud to be identified with the street preachers, although I am 
not one and do not deserve that title.


Perry



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:34:29 EDT



Blaine:  Oliver Granger got his name in the DC, and for that  reason 
alone,
he will fulfill the prophecy.  Do you see my name in the  DC?  Nope.  Do 
you

see Dave's name in the DC?   Nope.  With twelve going on thirteen million
readers of the DC, surely  many of them will note this prophecy, 
especially
since you AND your fellow  street preachers have made such an effort to 
point his
low profile out.  By  now, I imagine I have heard or read his name at least 
a

dozen times.  At  the present rate, Oliver Granger cannot help but become
almost as famous as  Joseph Smith and easily as famous as Brigham Young.

In a message dated 6/13/2005 10:42:57 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Blaine,  in the Doctrine and Covenants, section 117:12 JS wrote the 
following


prophecy:

And again, I say unto you, I remember my servant  Oliver Granger; behold,
verily I say unto him that his name shall be had  in sacred remembrance 
from

generation to generation, forever and ever,  saith the Lord.

Do you know who Oliver Granger is? If not, please ask  your spritual 
source,

because I have been wanting to know this for a long  time. Let me know what
he/she  says.

Thanks,
Perry






--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

2005-06-13 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Do you think you Grandfather is a god now, with spirit wives, and possible 
the pitter-patter of little spirit feet?



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:15:05 EDT


In a message dated 6/13/2005 2:09:44 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I  would think that we all choose to believe whatever based upon our view 
of


the credibility of the truth source closest to us in terms of time  and
space.I mean, if Blaine was born a  Mormon,'  his first source of
truth would be his parents.   Who's he going to believe  --  his 
parents
or some guy  standing cross the street waving underwear.  And, by the 
time

he gets to a free thinking age,  he already has such a  systematize faith
that little will prevail against it.THAT'S NORMAL.Blaine may or 
not
believe this -- but  THANK GOD WE DO NOT HAVE TO 
BE

RIGHT.

JD


Blaine:  Good, JD.  I agree parents are critical in what  children end up
believing. I am very fortunate to have had good advice and  guidance from 
my mom
and dad.My grandpa was also very  influential, mostly by his example.  
He
served two missions (LDS) to  Norway, and another one to Spokane, 
Washington.

He recorded many  miraculous healings, casting out of devils, etc. in his
writings.  He was a  Judge in regular life, and often required those he saw 
in
court to go to church,  the denomination being left to them.  He was always 
in
favor of religious  training, regardless of the belief system.  Any belief 
that
advocates  Christian values, he felt, was better than the value systems 
that
got people  into trouble with the law.  Nevertheless, he lived and died by 
the

LDS  doctrines.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.