Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-21 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/20/2005 4:35:53 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/18/2005 11:24:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is 
safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...

In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to 
  become perfect--which may take more time for some than 
  others.I do OK in following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, 
  and I believe I do better each day--but I am after all a son of Adam and 
  Eve, from whom I inherited imperfections.
  1 Cor 15:44-52
  
  cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE 
  and will have no 
inheritance.

Where does it say that, Dean? We are all sons and daughters of 
Adam and Eve, who inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an 
exception? 

ICor 15:22:"For as in Adam all die so in Christ shall all 
be made alive". I no longer have eternal death as I am of Christ not Adam. 
Also read 1 Cor 15:44-52-because of Christ I am restored-that makes me an 
exception.

Ooooh!! I see. An exception!! Hmmm, :)
Iam guessingyou are trying to interpret this passage to 
mean youhave becomeabove temptation, and the 
other conditions of fallen humanity. Is this 
correct?
Blainerb


  






Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-20 Thread Dean Moore








- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/18/2005 11:24:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...

In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to become perfect--which may take more time for some than others.I do OK in following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each day--but I am after all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited imperfections.
1 Cor 15:44-52

cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE and will have no inheritance.

Where does it say that, Dean? We are all sons and daughters of Adam and Eve, who inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an exception? 

ICor 15:22:"For as in Adam all die so in Christ shall all be made alive". I no longer have eternal death as I am of Christ not Adam. Also read 1 Cor 15:44-52-because of Christ I am restored-that makes me an exception.



Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to become 
  perfect--which may take more time for some than others.I do OK in 
  following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each 
  day--but I am after all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited 
  imperfections.
  
  cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE and 
  will have no inheritance.

Where does it say that, Dean? We are all sons and daughters of Adam 
and Eve, who inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an 
exception? 




Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-18 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Blaine, if you and a fellow mormon disagreed on the meaning of a verse, you 
would go to your Bishop, he would tell you what it means, and regardless of 
the answer, you both would acceot that, am I right? If not, how would you 
resolve it?




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON 
RESPONSE TO THE ...

Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:24:46 EST

In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Blainerb:  To be perfect, it seems one would first have to become
perfect--which may take more time for some than others.  I do OK in  
following the
admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each  day--but I am 
after

all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited  imperfections.

cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE and  will have no
inheritance.


Where does it say that, Dean?  We are all sons and daughters of Adam  and
Eve, who inherit the conditions of the fall.  Are you an  exception?





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-18 Thread Blainerb473





Most Bishops have so much to do that they have little time to answer petty 
questions to resolve doctrinal disputes. I would not take a problem of 
that nature to my Bishop. No one I know would. Doctrinal disputes 
seldom happen, since the BoM and the DC are very clear. I know this 
sounds weird, but it happens to be true. If I have a doctrinal 
misunderstanding, I just study it out in my own mind, and the answer usually 
presents itself via the Spirit of the Lord. 
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/18/2005 9:36:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, 
  if you and a fellow mormon disagreed on the meaning of a verse, you would 
  go to your Bishop, he would tell you what it means, and regardless of the 
  answer, you both would acceot that, am I right? If not, how would you 
  resolve it?From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe 
  to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...Date: Sun, 18 Dec 
  2005 23:24:46 ESTIn a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M. 
  Mountain Standard Time,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:Blainerb: To "be perfect," it 
  seems one would first have to becomeperfect--which may take more time 
  for some than others. I do OK in following 
  theadmonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each 
  day--but I am afterall a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I 
  inherited imperfections.cd:Christians are son of Christ 
  -the lost are sons of AE and will have 
  noinheritance.Where does it say that, 
  Dean? We are all sons and daughters of Adam andEve, who 
  inherit the conditions of the fall. Are you an 
  exception?




Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-18 Thread Charles Perry Locke


What if you are wrong?


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON 
RESPONSE TO THE ...

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:06:25 EST



Most Bishops have so much to do that they have little time to answer petty
questions to resolve doctrinal disputes.  I would not take a problem of  
that
nature to my Bishop.  No one I know would.  Doctrinal disputes  seldom 
happen,
since the BoM and the DC are very clear.  I know this  sounds weird, but 
it
happens to be true.  If I have a doctrinal  misunderstanding, I just study 
it
out in my own mind, and the answer usually  presents itself via the Spirit 
of

the Lord.
Blainerb


In a message dated 12/18/2005 9:36:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Blaine,  if you and a fellow mormon disagreed on the meaning of a verse, 
you
would  go to your Bishop, he would tell you what it means, and regardless 
of

the  answer, you both would acceot that, am I right? If not, how would you
resolve it?


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe  to assume that NO MORMON
RESPONSE TO THE ...
Date: Sun, 18 Dec  2005 23:24:46 EST

In a message dated 12/17/2005 5:09:12 P.M.  Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  writes:



Blainerb:  To be perfect, it  seems one would first have to become
perfect--which may take more time  for some than others.  I do OK in
following  the
admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each   day--but I 
am

after
all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I  inherited  imperfections.

cd:Christians are son of Christ  -the lost are sons of AE and  will have 
 no

inheritance.


Where does it say that,  Dean?  We are all sons and daughters of Adam  
and

Eve, who  inherit the conditions of the fall.  Are you an   exception?








--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:59:46 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  So a Satanist is on vacation in Utah
  he decides to take a tour of the temple.
  What do you think his thoughts would be when he sees his symbol for his 
  god on your buildings?

Blainerb: Actually, that is not 
outside the realm of possibility--a lot of people vacationing in Utah see the 
stars and etc. on the temples. Most are not concerned, unless they have 
been brainwashed by the Street Preachers. 
But, in answer to your question, I hope 
he would investigate the LDS religion and become enlightened as we are--he would 
have to give up his Satan worship, however, to be baptized into the 
Church.


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-17 Thread Blainerb473




Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to become 
perfect--which may take more time for some than others.I do OK in 
following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each 
day--but I am after all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited 
imperfections.


In a message dated 12/16/2005 9:03:41 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is 
  perfect." 
  
  Notice it does not say become perfect it says BE - Present TENSE
  How are you doing?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  



You are entitled to your opinion, Lance, however, I do not see that 
such Mormon beliefs as you have outlined detract from traditional 
Christianity--they do go beyond it, but I see no reason this should be an 
arrow in the side of Christians who are trying to live Christianity as they 
understand it.I see nothing unhallowed in the 
God-was-a-man-who-became-perfect beliefs of the Mormon Church--in fact, it 
seems to be quite a lofty idea, aimed at improving one's motivationto 
become perfect and more god-like. As Jesus said, "Be ye 
therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." Do you 
not intend to keep this commandment, Lance? 
Blainerb




Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-17 Thread Dean Moore








- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/17/2005 5:04:17 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...


Blainerb: To "be perfect," it seems one would first have to become perfect--which may take more time for some than others.I do OK in following the admonitions of Jesus Christ, and I believe I do better each day--but I am after all a son of Adam and Eve, from whom I inherited imperfections.

cd:Christians are son of Christ -the lost are sons of AE and will have no inheritance.


In a message dated 12/16/2005 9:03:41 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." 

Notice it does not say become perfect it says BE - Present TENSE
How are you doing?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




You are entitled to your opinion, Lance, however, I do not see that such Mormon beliefs as you have outlined detract from traditional Christianity--they do go beyond it, but I see no reason this should be an arrow in the side of Christians who are trying to live Christianity as they understand it.I see nothing unhallowed in the God-was-a-man-who-became-perfect beliefs of the Mormon Church--in fact, it seems to be quite a lofty idea, aimed at improving one's motivationto become perfect and more god-like. As Jesus said, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." Do you not intend to keep this commandment, Lance? 
Blainerb



Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/16/2005 12:45:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  IS FORTHCOMING!!??
  
  Y'all are pleased to engage on minutiae but on the big issues y'all 'take 
  a pass'? WHY?

Blainerb: I consider a post that suggests Mormons adhere to Satanism 
to be a "big issue." Are you suggesting Kevin be allowed to "take a 
pass" on this issue? That suggests to me he has no URL tying the 
photo to LDS buildings, and wants to be let off the hook. If he does have 
such, I am interested in seeing the source, whether it be valid, or just another 
anti-Mormon potshot at the LDS Church. 



Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Lance Muir



Let me take a 'shot' at it (the SATANISM THINGY)

If a group adheres to a theology wherein 1. their god was a man who became 
a god who begat children (spiritually) who subsequently inhabited that god's 
planet and rebelled against their god partly through the temptation of one of 
their god's sons (lucifer) so that one of their god's other sons (jesus) had to 
be born through a union of their god and one of the people on that god's planet 
(mary)so as to redeem the 'rebelled ones' THEN I WOULD SAY THAT THERE JUST 
MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO THIS SATANISM THINGY"
IMO OF COURSE!!
- Original Message - 

  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: December 16, 2005 14:58
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is 
  safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...
  
  
  In a message dated 12/16/2005 12:45:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
IS FORTHCOMING!!??

Y'all are pleased to engage on minutiae but on the big issues y'all 
'take a pass'? WHY?
  
  Blainerb: I consider a post that suggests Mormons adhere to 
  Satanism to be a "big issue." Are you suggesting Kevin be allowed to 
  "take a pass" on this issue? That suggests to me he has no URL 
  tying the photo to LDS buildings, and wants to be let off the hook. If 
  he does have such, I am interested in seeing the source, whether it be valid, 
  or just another anti-Mormon potshot at the LDS Church. 
  


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473





You are entitled to your opinion, Lance, however, I do not see that such 
Mormon beliefs as you have outlined detract from traditional Christianity--they 
do go beyond it, but I see no reason this should be an arrow in the side of 
Christians who are trying to live Christianity as they understand 
it.I see nothing unhallowed in the God-was-a-man-who-became-perfect 
beliefs of the Mormon Church--in fact, it seems to be quite a lofty idea, aimed 
at improving one's motivationto become perfect and more 
god-like. As Jesus said, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your 
Father in heaven is perfect." Do you not intend to keep this commandment, 
Lance? 
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/16/2005 1:41:50 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Let me take a 'shot' at it (the SATANISM THINGY)
  
  If a group adheres to a theology wherein 1. their god was a man who 
  became a god who begat children (spiritually) who subsequently inhabited that 
  god's planet and rebelled against their god partly through the temptation of 
  one of their god's sons (lucifer) so that one of their god's other sons 
  (jesus) had to be born through a union of their god and one of the people on 
  that god's planet (mary)so as to redeem the 'rebelled ones' THEN I WOULD 
  SAY THAT THERE JUST MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO THIS SATANISM THINGY"
  IMO OF COURSE!!
  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: December 16, 2005 14:58
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is 
safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...


In a message dated 12/16/2005 12:45:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  IS FORTHCOMING!!??
  
  Y'all are pleased to engage on minutiae but on the big issues y'all 
  'take a pass'? WHY?

Blainerb: I consider a post that suggests Mormons adhere to 
Satanism to be a "big issue." Are you suggesting Kevin be allowed to 
"take a pass" on this issue? That suggests to me he has no URL 
tying the photo to LDS buildings, and wants to be let off the hook. If 
he does have such, I am interested in seeing the source, whether it be 
valid, or just another anti-Mormon potshot at the LDS Church. 





Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




Were you or were you not attempting to suggest Mormons 
believed in/practiced Satanism
by posting that photo of the 5-sided star with 666 
embedded in it, along with other valid photos of stars on Mormon 
buildings? Just answer "yes" or "no." 
Blainerb

In a message dated 12/16/2005 1:37:07 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Go back and reread the posts
  I did not say Mormons are 
  SatanistsI asked a simple question "why do you 
  have satanic symbols on your building?"
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  




Blainerb: I consider a post that suggests Mormons adhere to 
Satanism to be a "big issue." Are you suggesting Kevin be allowed to 
"take a pass" on this issue? That suggests to me he has no URL 
tying the photo to LDS buildings, and wants to be let off the hook. If 
he does have such, I am interested in seeing the source, whether it be 
valid, or just another anti-Mormon potshot at the LDS Church. 





Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 12/16/2005 1:37:07 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Go back and reread the posts
  I did not say Mormons are 
  SatanistsI asked a simple question "why do you 
  have satanic symbols on your building?"
  

Blainerb: The answer is and always has been, we do not have Satanist 
symbols on our buildings. If they appear to be such, then they are only such in 
the eye of the beholder. They were never intended to be Satanist symbols, 
but the opposite--symbols of Jesus Christ, of heaven, etc. This, of 
course, led to a discussion on why we do not have crosses, as you will 
remember. And then everyone got all upset because we had stars, not 
crosses, on our buildings. Now a lot of people are mad at us because, as 
they say at least, we "hate crosses" which we actually do not. Hmmm, we 
have been through a lot together, huh Kevin? It gets almost humorous, 
doesn't it? 


Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Kevin Deegan
So a Satanist is on vacation in Utah  he decides to take a tour of the temple.  What do you think his thoughts would be when he sees his symbol for his god on your buildings?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 12/16/2005 1:37:07 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Go back and reread the posts  I did not say Mormons are SatanistsI asked a simple question "why do you have satanic symbols on your building?" 
 Blainerb: The answer is and always has been, we do not have Satanist symbols on our buildings. If they appear to be such, then they are only such in the eye of the beholder. They were never intended to be Satanist symbols, but the opposite--symbols of Jesus Christ, of heaven, etc. This, of course, led to a discussion on why we do not have crosses, as you will remember. And then everyone got all upset because we had stars, not crosses, on our buildings. Now a lot of people are mad at us because, as they say at least, we "hate crosses" which we actually do not. Hmmm, we have been through a lot together, huh Kevin? It gets almost humorous, doesn't it?   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE ...

2005-12-16 Thread Kevin Deegan
"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." Notice it does not say become perfect it says BE - Present TENSE  How are you doing?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  You are entitled to your opinion, Lance, however, I do not see that such Mormon beliefs as you have outlined detract from traditional Christianity--they do go beyond it, but I see no reason this should be an arrow in the side of Christians who are trying to live Christianity as they understand it.I see nothing unhallowed in the God-was-a-man-who-became-perfect beliefs of the Mormon Church--in fact, it seems to be quite a lofty idea, aimed at improving one's
 motivationto become perfect and more god-like. As Jesus said, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." Do you not intend to keep this commandment, Lance?   BlainerbIn a message dated 12/16/2005 1:41:50 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Let me take a 'shot' at it (the SATANISM THINGY)If a group adheres to a theology wherein 1. their god was a man who became a god who begat children (spiritually) who subsequently inhabited that god's planet and rebelled against their god partly through the temptation of one of their god's sons (lucifer) so that one of their god's other sons (jesus) had to be born through a union of their god and one of the people
 on that god's planet (mary)so as to redeem the 'rebelled ones' THEN I WOULD SAY THAT THERE JUST MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO THIS SATANISM THINGY"  IMO OF COURSE!!  - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Sent: December 16, 2005 14:58  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON RESPONSE TO THE "...  In a
 message dated 12/16/2005 12:45:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:IS FORTHCOMING!!??Y'all are pleased to engage on minutiae but on the big issues y'all 'take a pass'? WHY?Blainerb: I consider a post that suggests Mormons adhere to Satanism to be a "big issue." Are you suggesting Kevin be allowed to "take a pass" on this issue? That suggests to me he has no URL tying the photo to LDS buildings, and wants to be let off the hook. If he does have such, I am interested in seeing the source, whether it be valid, or just another anti-Mormon potshot at the LDS Church.  
   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com