Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 designations

[Matt Hoppes]

Running a 56MHz wide channel.  You can't license 56MHz.. it's either 
40MHz or 80MHz.  So you license an 80MHz channel, and then use 56MHz of it.

On 2/13/20 2:42 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
> I see occasionally submissions for AF=11FX links with an Emissions 
> Designation of 79M6D7D, which is basically 80Mhz CW. Since the AF-11FX 
> has a limit of 56Mhz CW, what are these companies doing?
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue

[Matt Hoppes]

I stopped upgrading at 5.5.4. 

The 6.x Branch has a nasty bug where when the AP has been up somewhere between 
30 and 60 days stations won’t attach again if they lose power/are disconnected 
unless you reboot the AP. 

> On Jan 25, 2020, at 5:42 PM, Mitch  wrote:
> 
> Sorry Typo
> 
> XM 6.0.4 signed
> 
> Mitch
> 
>> On 1/24/2020 12:04 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>> On over 15 900 APs, new ones and ones in field for years. It seems to have 
>> started at OS 6.17 and then, no matter what OS you try, the APs will drop 
>> all customers sometime multiple times a day, or every other day or so.  
>> Nothing changed and on multiple networks and counties.
>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 16:59 Josh Luthman  
>>> wrote:
>>> Hardware failure it sounds like.  If it simply doesn't associate until it 
>>> is rebooted it's either software (which is unlikely if you've tried various 
>>> versions) or hardware.
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
>>> 
 On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:56 PM Clay Stewart  
 wrote:
 For several weeks now, or longer, random 900 APs drop all customers and 
 have to be rebooted to get them back. Setting WatchDog is NOT a solution, 
 it only has customers interrupted often, and not down till a reboot.
 
 It does not seem to matter which OS we use. 
 
 Has anyone found a solution?
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] Thoughts on a new hire

[Matt Hoppes]

Hire someone who someone at the company knows and can vouch for.   Hire 
slow... Fire fast.

On 9/17/19 5:39 PM, Tony Iacopi wrote:
> Hi all, in todays market, I’m having a lot of trouble hiring a solid 
> network engineer to fill an upcoming vacancy.  Does anyone have any 
> ideas that have helped them in the past?  Let me know.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> 
> Tony Iacopi
> 
> t...@razzolink.net 
> 
> 831-789-8149 Ext 1919 (office)
> 
> 831-902-0700 (cell)
> 
> 
> ___
> Members mailing list
> memb...@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
> 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

[Matt Hoppes]

People didn’t buy. Move on. Good months and bad. Don’t like it?  Stop 
investing. Any other questions?

Good. This concludes the 4th quarter call. 

H. Guess that’s why my company isn’t public. 

> On Aug 12, 2018, at 13:51, Mathew Howard  wrote:
> 
> What Mike is saying, is pretty simple. Service provider revenue for the last 
> quarter was $20 million lower than the previous two quarters, and they need 
> something to blame that drop on. 
> 
> No, it's not like someone stole money out of their bank account, it's just 
> that they didn't make as much as they were probably expected to, based on 
> their history. but the result is, that they don't have $20 million that 
> investors probably expected them to have, and that has to be explained.
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
> of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net]
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 8:37 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium
> 
> How do you lose revenue you haven’t made?  It’s not like someone stole money 
> out of their bank account. 
> 
> A sale not made isn’t a lost sale unless you can prove someone was going to 
> buy something and then didn’t. That’s hard to prove. 
> 
> And how did you get this information ahead of the call?
> 
> On Aug 12, 2018, at 09:18, Mike Hammett  wrote:
> 
>> I think I figured out the motivation. They lost $20m in service provider 
>> revenue last quarter. Next quarter's call is in 2 weeks. They needed 
>> something to say.
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RppWkREqtinzA2obwaZuItc5553tqqYYiEhcXefnb7I/edit?usp=sharing
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP
>> 
>> 
>> From: "Mike Hammett" 
>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:30:58 AM
>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium
>> 
>> https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/1660546944070751
>> 
>> Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. sues Cambium Networks .
>> 
>> https://www.law360.com/articles/1071813/wireless-co-ubiquiti-says-rival-sells-hacking-firmware
>> 
>> I'd like to see more of the claims.
>> 
>> They've also sued Sakid Ahmed and Dmitry Moiseev of Cambium.
>> They've sued WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. .
>> 
>> They've sued BLIP Networks , a WISP in southern Illinois.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

[Matt Hoppes]

That link is for past data - already reported on. Not the upcoming report. 

But, that was sequential, not year over year...year over year, it was close to 
flat revenue

> On Aug 12, 2018, at 09:42, Mike Hammett  wrote:
> 
> Trying to figure out how you got to what you just said has made my head hurt.
> 
> Clicking the link I provided may help you answer some of that.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> From: "Matt Hoppes" 
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 8:37:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium
> 
> How do you lose revenue you haven’t made?  It’s not like someone stole money 
> out of their bank account. 
> 
> A sale not made isn’t a lost sale unless you can prove someone was going to 
> buy something and then didn’t. That’s hard to prove. 
> 
> And how did you get this information ahead of the call?
> 
> On Aug 12, 2018, at 09:18, Mike Hammett  wrote:
> 
> I think I figured out the motivation. They lost $20m in service provider 
> revenue last quarter. Next quarter's call is in 2 weeks. They needed 
> something to say.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RppWkREqtinzA2obwaZuItc5553tqqYYiEhcXefnb7I/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> From: "Mike Hammett" 
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:30:58 AM
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium
> 
> https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/1660546944070751
> 
> Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. sues Cambium Networks .
> 
> https://www.law360.com/articles/1071813/wireless-co-ubiquiti-says-rival-sells-hacking-firmware
> 
> I'd like to see more of the claims.
> 
> They've also sued Sakid Ahmed and Dmitry Moiseev of Cambium.
> They've sued WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. .
> 
> They've sued BLIP Networks , a WISP in southern Illinois.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

[Matt Hoppes]

How do you lose revenue you haven’t made?  It’s not like someone stole money 
out of their bank account. 

A sale not made isn’t a lost sale unless you can prove someone was going to buy 
something and then didn’t. That’s hard to prove. 

And how did you get this information ahead of the call?

> On Aug 12, 2018, at 09:18, Mike Hammett  wrote:
> 
> I think I figured out the motivation. They lost $20m in service provider 
> revenue last quarter. Next quarter's call is in 2 weeks. They needed 
> something to say.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RppWkREqtinzA2obwaZuItc5553tqqYYiEhcXefnb7I/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> From: "Mike Hammett" 
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:30:58 AM
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium
> 
> https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/1660546944070751
> 
> Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. sues Cambium Networks .
> 
> https://www.law360.com/articles/1071813/wireless-co-ubiquiti-says-rival-sells-hacking-firmware
> 
> I'd like to see more of the claims.
> 
> They've also sued Sakid Ahmed and Dmitry Moiseev of Cambium.
> They've sued WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. .
> 
> They've sued BLIP Networks , a WISP in southern Illinois.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Why are you shipping me air?

[Matt Hoppes]

Ben, this is good news to hear; but I am still waiting for my UBAM that only 
has two screws for it instead of three. :-) I was promised that three years ago.

> On May 25, 2018, at 18:34, Ben Moore via Ubnt_users  
> wrote:
> 
> Agree, hear you loud and clear...These are being moved ASAP to 5-pack.  
> Unfortunately will take a couple of months to get into channel, but this has 
> already been implemented.
> 
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Kees H.  wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> Why oh why?
>>  
>> Just ordered 10 PBE-5AC-GEN2-US UBNT Powerbeam M5 Gen2 AC
>>  
>> So I expect to get 2 boxes 5 each just as the PBE-5 are packaged. 
>>  
>> BUT NOOO.  They now stick 2 radios in the same size box as the PBE-5
>>  
>> So now I pay 2.5 X the shipping and have to discard even more cardboard.
>>  
>> UBNT who is your biggest customer?  The end user or the WISP?
>>  
>> Mind you we have over 1000 radios in the field and in our territory there 
>> are maybe 3 end user links.  So why do you package your equipment geared to 
>> endusers?  For me put 10 radios and adapters in one box and 10 dishes in 
>> another box with the hardware and you make me very happy.  And don’t send me 
>> instructions flyers.  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Buying fees horns

[Matt Hoppes]

Ugh

> On Apr 17, 2018, at 22:28, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We need a distributor to ask for them so we can buy them otherwise no one has 
> them in stock.
> 
> Alex Phillips
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> 540-908-3993
> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> September 6-8th 2018
> #AMP18
> @PriorityConf Twitter
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Matt Hoppes 
>> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>> Can you still buy just the AC fees horn?
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Buying fees horns

[Matt Hoppes]

Can you still buy just the AC fees horn?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Matt Hoppes]

Why is that?  They are 35dB antennas.

17 + 35 - 2 = 50, which is right where we are.

On 3/26/18 1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
> And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to work 
> on the alignment, Matt.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net 
> <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, but you have a much stronger link - you're at -48 with 17dbm
> Tx Power.
> 
> 
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Matt Hoppes
> [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
> <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:26 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Darin Steffl
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
> 
> I'm not sure what has been discussed here, but we have 10x going on this
> link (see picture)
> 
> On 3/26/18 11:48 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>  > Alex,
>  >
>  > Frequency coordinators are supposed to find you spectrum but at
> the end
>  > of the day, it's up to your company to engineer/design the link
> to meet
>  > your required signal and bandwidth needs. The manual for the AF11fx
>  > clearly spells out the required signal levels and power levels
> needed to
>  > achieve 6x, 8x, 10x modulation schemes. 18db is MAX power that can be
>  > used to achieve 10x for example and then whatever the required signal
>  > level is listed but I don't have it memorized.
>  >
>  > Sorry to put you on the spot and I don't mean any disrespect but you
>  > guys kind of messed up. Don't rely on frequency coordinators to
> design
>  > your links. Only use them to find you spectrum.
>  >
>  > A 17 mile link in 11ghz should definitely have minimum 3 foot
> antennas
>  > on each end but I would plan on using 4 foot antennas to be safe
> if the
>  > link is important to you and you want max bandwidth.
>  >
>  > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38 AM, alex phillips
> <highspeedl...@gmail.com <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>
>  > <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com
> <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>  >
>  >     Yes, this is what I Am concluding as well.  I have spoken with my
>  >     freq coordinator about making changes to their software that
>  >     estimates these links to account for this.
>  >
>  >     /*Alex Phillips*/
>  >     CEO and General Manager
>  >     RBNS.net
>  >     HighSpeedLink.net
>  >     *540-908-3993 <tel:(540)%20908-3993>*
>  >     Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
>  >     September 6-8th 2018
>  >     #AMP18
>  >     @PriorityConf Twitter
>  >
>  >     On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Mathew Howard
> <mat...@litewire.net <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>
>  >     <mailto:mat...@litewire.net <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>>> wrote:
>  >
>  >         Yes, but the bigger problem here, if I'm reading Alex's
>  >         screenshot correctly, is that this is a 17 mile link using 2'
>  >         dishes, and there's a very good chance that there simply
> isn't
>  >         enough signal for 10X to work. According to airlink, the
> signal
>  >         should be right on the edge of 10X territory at that
> distance,
>  >         which those antennas, but in the real world there's a good
>  >         chance it isn't going to work... and there's certainly no
> fade
>  >         margin to speak of at 10X.
>  >
>  >   
>   
>  >         *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>
>  >         <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>>
>  >         [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>
>  >         <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>>] on behalf of David Jones
>  >         [d...@nglconnection.com <mailto:d...@nglconnection.com>
> <mailto:d...@nglconnection.com <mailto:d...@nglconnection.com>>]
>  >         *Sent:* Monday, March 

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Matt Hoppes]

I guess I missed the original e-mail.  What power level and signal are 
we questioning here?

On 3/26/18 12:58 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
> Yeah, but you have a much stronger link - you're at -48 with 17dbm Tx Power.
> 
> 
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
> of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:26 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Darin Steffl
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
> 
> I'm not sure what has been discussed here, but we have 10x going on this
> link (see picture)
> 
> On 3/26/18 11:48 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>> Alex,
>>
>> Frequency coordinators are supposed to find you spectrum but at the end
>> of the day, it's up to your company to engineer/design the link to meet
>> your required signal and bandwidth needs. The manual for the AF11fx
>> clearly spells out the required signal levels and power levels needed to
>> achieve 6x, 8x, 10x modulation schemes. 18db is MAX power that can be
>> used to achieve 10x for example and then whatever the required signal
>> level is listed but I don't have it memorized.
>>
>> Sorry to put you on the spot and I don't mean any disrespect but you
>> guys kind of messed up. Don't rely on frequency coordinators to design
>> your links. Only use them to find you spectrum.
>>
>> A 17 mile link in 11ghz should definitely have minimum 3 foot antennas
>> on each end but I would plan on using 4 foot antennas to be safe if the
>> link is important to you and you want max bandwidth.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38 AM, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>  Yes, this is what I Am concluding as well.  I have spoken with my
>>  freq coordinator about making changes to their software that
>>  estimates these links to account for this.
>>
>>  /*Alex Phillips*/
>>  CEO and General Manager
>>  RBNS.net
>>  HighSpeedLink.net
>>  *540-908-3993 <tel:(540)%20908-3993>*
>>  Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
>>  September 6-8th 2018
>>  #AMP18
>>  @PriorityConf Twitter
>>
>>  On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net
>>  <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
>>
>>  Yes, but the bigger problem here, if I'm reading Alex's
>>  screenshot correctly, is that this is a 17 mile link using 2'
>>  dishes, and there's a very good chance that there simply isn't
>>  enough signal for 10X to work. According to airlink, the signal
>>  should be right on the edge of 10X territory at that distance,
>>  which those antennas, but in the real world there's a good
>>  chance it isn't going to work... and there's certainly no fade
>>  margin to speak of at 10X.
>>
>>  
>> 
>>  *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>>  <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>
>>  [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>>  <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of David Jones
>>  [d...@nglconnection.com <mailto:d...@nglconnection.com>]
>>  *Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2018 5:42 AM
>>
>>  *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>>  *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>>
>>  I can confirm with Adair
>>
>>  in order to get 10x you need TX set at 18 and no auto power back
>>  off. However you can use the MIMO and Short CP
>>
>>
>>  On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Mathew Howard
>>  <mat...@litewire.net <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
>>
>>  I haven't ever been able to get the auto power back off to
>>  work properly... the first thing I'd try would be to turn
>>  that off and just set the max power to 18dbm... but the
>>  problem is, that when you do that, you're going to probably
>>  lose too much signal to maintain a 10x link (judging from
>>  the dashboard screenshot). If you go to the latest beta
>>  firmware, you'll probably be able to get 9x working, but I
>>  suspect the link just isn't going to be able to do 10x.
>>
>>  
>> 
>>  *From:* ubn

Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU

[Matt Hoppes]

Steve,
Unthrottled what does your download and upload speed look like?

> On Feb 19, 2018, at 21:01, Chris J. Ruschmann  wrote:
> 
> Have you tried disabling Pause Frames on the Netonix switch? We’ve had an 
> issues with Airfibers and that feature on a few sites.
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Steve Barnes
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 10:56 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU
>  
> Yeah everything is on AIRcontrol.  Just can figure it out. 
>  
> At peak times I can run TCP Btest from PC through CPE to Router on Local 
> tower2 and get 45-50 Meg.  (10Mhz channel)
>  
> Btest from Router Tower2 to Router tower1 and get 200Meg.  (AF5x link 250M 
> capacity Only 50-100M used).
> 
> Tower 1 Connected to GB fiber and can get 700Meg to Dist router at Core due 
> to traffic. 
>  
> But from PC through all to Dist router I can only get 8 Mbps at night.  
> During the morning when traffic is low I can get 45Mbps.  So has to be 
> buffer, retry, MTU, cpu, etc. but I cant pin point it.  Ping times stay 
> pretty stable. AMQ and AMC really good on this AP, 90%+. 
>  
> Giving some serious thought to Preseem.
>  
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon Broadband
> NLBC.COM
> PCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Chris J. Ruschmann
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 1:34 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU
>  
> Are you running air control or anything else that can aggregate the 
> performance of your site in some nice easy to read graphs?
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Steve Barnes
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 7:38 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] MTU
>  
> I am trying to get every last drop out of our internet.  Most towers have a 
> MikroTik Routing, Netonix doing POE and Switching, Fed by AF5x, and Rockets 
> or Prism for AP’s.  Sometimes seeing some slow downs I cant account for.  
> Wondering  if MTU or Flow control needs adjusted.
>  
> The MTU settings are as follows:
> MikroTik MTU: 1500  L2 MTU: 1598 Flow Disabled
> Netonix MTU: 1528   Both
> AF5x Up to 9600 Auto  Flow Disabled
> Rocket MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled
> Prism MTU: 1500   Flow Disabled
>  
> In your experience should any of these be adjusted?
>  
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon Broadband
> NLBC.COM
> PCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>  
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT new Firmware

[Matt Hoppes]

Why are you upgrading the moment new firmware comes out?

We generally wait two weeks to see what response there is. 

Then Deploy that version on a small test site and let it burn for two weeks. 

Then roll out to the entire network. 

Generally are behind on dot releases by 2-4 but it allows us to run stable 
software on the network. 

> On Sep 9, 2017, at 15:06, Josh Luthman  wrote:
> 
> LOL!
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> On Sep 9, 2017 2:51 PM, "alex phillips"  wrote:
> Forbes I was just talking with Robert last week and he says he does that just 
> to piss you off
> 
> On Sep 9, 2017 2:24 PM, "Forbes Mercy"  wrote:
>> Obviously Ubiquiti doesn't appreciate the time it takes to upgrade a few
>> thousand radios by coming out with a new firmware every few days.  Get
>> it right the first time people!
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PBE-5AC-Gen2 US - Ubiquiti airMAX PowerBeam

[Matt Hoppes]

No

> On Jul 5, 2017, at 11:56 PM, RickG  wrote:
> 
> Am I reading the specs correctly and this is a dual-band radio?
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power

[Matt Hoppes]

What sentence?  I clearly missed an email. 

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Jan Van Kort  wrote:
> 
> Great ideas, thanks.  Added that sentence to the site service lease contract 
> about binding to next property owner.  Got ahold of the attorney person, they 
> going to keep the power on for me.  This is what happens when you call 
> yourself a sovereign nation and the IRS comes and taketh away!
> 
>> On 2017-06-06 11:08 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> All of our accounts are DP (Dayton Power & Light).  They are business 
>> accounts, NOT commercial accounts.  Commercial you are charged based on peak 
>> usage.
>> 
>> Looking at a bill it was $13.05 for 41 kwhr on single phase.  This is 6 Ubnt 
>> AP, 1 Ubnt camera, 1 Epmp AP, rb2011, 1 af5x
>> 
>> 
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:01 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller  
>> wrote:
>>>  
>>> Almost all of our meters are $22 a month
>>>  
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: G. Nicholas
>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 12:38 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power
>>> 
>>> Josh,
>>> 
>>> I wish I had your utility company, who is your provider?  In IL Ameren 
>>> considers 
>>> tower sites to be business rate not residential, so the basic account 
>>> charge and 
>>> meter charge is $45 even if I use 0 kwh.  So an ave tower site with 
>>> separately 
>>> metered service runs us around $75/m.
>>> 
>>> Garth
>>> 
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: can...@believewireless.net
>>> Sent: 6/6/2017 10:32:17 AM
>>> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power
>>> 
>>> > Solar an option?
>>> > 
>>> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Josh Luthman 
>>> > 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > > Can you just get your own meter installed?  Power should be like $10-20 
>>> > > a
>>> > > month for a handful of devices.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Josh Luthman
>>> > > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> > > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> > > 1100 Wayne St
>>> > > Suite 1337
>>> > > Troy, OH 45373
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Jan-OOLLC 
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Relocating tower, yes obvious solution, is there a legal way to prevent
>>> > >> power from being turned off in the meantime?  (FYI--a foreclosure that
>>> > >> went backwards and had been one of the first tower locations in the 
>>> > >> area
>>> > >> more than 10 years, so we believed the customer)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Jan V
>>> > >>
>>> > >> ___
>>> > >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ___
>>> > > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Fwd: airOS 6.0.3 Has Been Released! (Ubiquiti Networks Subscription Update)

[Matt Hoppes]

That's why we have a certification process each firmware has to go through. 

We also wait several dot releases before doing a deployment. 

We just upgraded from 1.7 to 1.9.1 on EdgeRouters and are going from 5.6.5 to 
6.0 on M gear. 

Still have some AC gear running 7.1.1. 

Things are much happier this way. 

> On Mar 30, 2017, at 13:15, Washington Broadband  wrote:
> 
> OMG does Ubiquiti have no idea what a major deal it is to keep upgrading 
> thousands of radios?  Keep coming out with minor fix upgrades every week, it 
> doesn't get much more annoying than that! Feels like Microsoft without the 
> auto-upgrade, not that I would want that.
> 
> Forbes
> 
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ubiquiti Community 
> Date: Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:45 PM
> Subject: airOS 6.0.3 Has Been Released! (Ubiquiti Networks Subscription 
> Update)
> To: wabroadb...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> Hi WABroadband,
> 
> UBNT-James (Ubiquiti Employee) posted a new article in airMAX Updates Blog on 
> 03-29-2017 11:44 PM :
> 
> airOS 6.0.3 Has Been Released!
> 
>  Version 
> 6.0.3 (XM/XW/TI) - Service Release (March 29, 2017) 
> --- Fixes: - Fix: Can't 
> change Output Power, Frequency and Frequency List without device reboot 
> Supported products * Bullet M2/M5/Titanium * Rocket M2/M2 
> Titanium/M3/M365/M900/M5/M5 GPS/M5 Titanium/M6 * NanoStation M2/M3/M365/M5/M6 
> * NanoStation Loco M2/M900/M5 * NanoBridge M2/M3/M365/M900/M5 * AirGrid 
> M2/M5/HP/HP New * PowerBridge M3/M365/M5/M10 * PicoStation M2 * AirRouter/HP 
> * PowerAP N * NanoBeam M2/M5 * AirGrid M5 HP * NanoStation M5 * NanoStation 
> M5 Loco * Rocket M5/Titanium
> 
>  
> 
> You can find "-cs" versions that support custom scripts HERE.
> 
>  
> 
> Please @mention me if you have any questions.
> 
> 
> Ubiquiti Networks sent this message to wabroadb...@gmail.com. 
> You are receiving this email because a new message matches your subscription 
> to a board.
> 
> To control which emails we send you please go to, manage your subscription & 
> notification settings or unsubscribe.
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] airOS Vulnerability Issue Update

[Matt Hoppes]

Vulnerability, yes, as much as the ability to steal my car by diving 
into the driver seat while I'm in the ghetto of Philadelphia ideling 
with the door open is a vulnerability.

On 3/21/17 6:39 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> It's still a vulnerability. Don't try to throw any dirt on it.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> 
> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:28:02 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] airOS Vulnerability Issue Update
>
> It is true... however to call it a vulnerability is a bit excessive.
>
> You literally have to be logged into a radio, while using an old
> browser, while browsing a shady site that specifically attacks your radio.
>
> On 3/21/17 4:12 PM, Eduardo wrote:
>> We got this notification from UBNT. Did anyone else also get it?
>>
>> Is this true, another vulnerability?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduardo
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Ubiquiti Networks [mailto:promoti...@ubnt.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 20, 2017 11:33 AM
>> *Subject:* airOS Vulnerability Issue Update
>>
>>
>>
>> Addressing Security Concerns. We take network security very seriously
>> and have fixed the command injection vulnerability for all affected
>> products: airMAX®, airGateway®, TOUGHSwitch™, and airFiber®..
>>
>> Ubiquiti Networks
>>
>>
>>
>> SOFTWARE
>>
>>
>>
>> OPERATOR
>>
>>
>>
>> UNIFI
>>
>>
>>
>> CONSUMER
>>
>>
>>
>> PRODUCTS
>>
>>
>>
>> BUY
>>
>>
>>  I M P O R T A N T
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Addressing Security Concerns
>>
>> We take network security very seriously and have fixed the authenticated
>> command injection vulnerability for all affected products: airMAX®,
>> airGateway®, TOUGHSwitch™, and airFiber®; please upgrade the firmware
>> for your devices. UniFi®, EdgeMAX®, and AmpliFi™products are not affected.
>>
>> While we acknowledge that all vulnerabilities are serious, we believe
>> this issue rates fairly low in terms of threat severity, because it
>> requires being authenticated to the management web interface, or
>> tricking an authenticated administrator into opening a targeted, crafted
>> URL in the browser where they are logged in to the affected device.
>> Ubiquiti strongly backs our security measures:
>>
>> · Dedicated Security Director focused 100% on Ubiquiti®software
>> vulnerabilities and supported by a strong group of engineers
>>
>>
>>
>> · Participation in third-party vulnerability assessment programs
>> such as HackerOne, where we have given out substantial rewards
>>
>>
>>
>> · Significant investment retaining third-party external security
>> audit company to review our software solutions frequently
>>
>> We’re currently addressing the php2 code concern, which will be
>> eliminated from applicable code bases within the next few weeks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Latest Firmware Updates
>>
>> Ubiquiti has updated the firmware for the affected devices. Please
>> update the firmware of your devices to the version listed here:
>>
>>
>>
>> DEVICES
>>
>>
>>
>> USE FIRMWARE
>>
>>
>>
>> v6.0.1 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v8.0.1 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v1.3.4 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v1.1.8 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v3.2.2 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v3.2.2 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v3.4.1 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> v3.6.1 or later
>>
>>
>>
>> For questions, contact our support team.
>>
>> Copyright © 2017, Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> Ubiquiti Networks 685 Third Avenue, 27th Floor New York, NY 10017 USA
>>
>> Share this on:
>>
>> Unsubscribe   |Update Preferences   |View in browser
>>
>> Follow: Facebook   |Twitter   |YouTube
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] airOS Vulnerability Issue Update

[Matt Hoppes]

It is true... however to call it a vulnerability is a bit excessive.

You literally have to be logged into a radio, while using an old 
browser, while browsing a shady site that specifically attacks your radio.

On 3/21/17 4:12 PM, Eduardo wrote:
> We got this notification from UBNT. Did anyone else also get it?
>
> Is this true, another vulnerability?
>
> Thanks,
> Eduardo
>
>
>
> *From:*Ubiquiti Networks [mailto:promoti...@ubnt.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 20, 2017 11:33 AM
> *Subject:* airOS Vulnerability Issue Update
>
>
>
> Addressing Security Concerns. We take network security very seriously
> and have fixed the command injection vulnerability for all affected
> products: airMAX®, airGateway®, TOUGHSwitch™, and airFiber®..
>
> Ubiquiti Networks
>
>   
>
> SOFTWARE
>
>   
>
> OPERATOR
>
>   
>
> UNIFI
>
>   
>
> CONSUMER
>
>   
>
> PRODUCTS
>
>   
>
> BUY
>
>
>  I M P O R T A N T
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   Addressing Security Concerns
>
> We take network security very seriously and have fixed the authenticated
> command injection vulnerability for all affected products: airMAX®,
> airGateway®, TOUGHSwitch™, and airFiber®; please upgrade the firmware
> for your devices. UniFi®, EdgeMAX®, and AmpliFi™products are not affected.
>
> While we acknowledge that all vulnerabilities are serious, we believe
> this issue rates fairly low in terms of threat severity, because it
> requires being authenticated to the management web interface, or
> tricking an authenticated administrator into opening a targeted, crafted
> URL in the browser where they are logged in to the affected device.
> Ubiquiti strongly backs our security measures:
>
> · Dedicated Security Director focused 100% on Ubiquiti®software
> vulnerabilities and supported by a strong group of engineers
>
>
>
> · Participation in third-party vulnerability assessment programs
> such as HackerOne, where we have given out substantial rewards
>
>
>
> · Significant investment retaining third-party external security
> audit company to review our software solutions frequently
>
> We’re currently addressing the php2 code concern, which will be
> eliminated from applicable code bases within the next few weeks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   Latest Firmware Updates
>
> Ubiquiti has updated the firmware for the affected devices. Please
> update the firmware of your devices to the version listed here:
>
>
>
> DEVICES
>
>   
>
> USE FIRMWARE
>
>   
>
> v6.0.1 or later
>
>   
>
> v8.0.1 or later
>
>   
>
> v1.3.4 or later
>
>   
>
> v1.1.8 or later
>
>   
>
> v3.2.2 or later
>
>   
>
> v3.2.2 or later
>
>   
>
> v3.4.1 or later
>
>   
>
> v3.6.1 or later
>
>
>
> For questions, contact our support team.
>
> Copyright © 2017, Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Ubiquiti Networks 685 Third Avenue, 27th Floor New York, NY 10017 USA
>
> Share this on:
>
> Unsubscribe   |Update Preferences   |View in browser
>
> Follow: Facebook   |Twitter   |YouTube
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

[Matt Hoppes]

Out of curiosity why was this not turned on already?

AC should be able to script it. If not I can script it for you. 

> On Mar 12, 2017, at 11:41, Rory Conaway  wrote:
> 
> We have confirmed that extra reporting has to be on for AC APs to see the 
> detail information on the stations button.  So, I have hundreds of radios 
> that now need that feature turned on.  Is there a script or some option in 
> AirControl that I’m missing so I don’t have to log in manually and do 800+ 
> radios?  Or possibly is this something that can simply go into  a firmware 
> upgrade and fix?
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:17 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Nope, no difference. 
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:14 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Didn’t make an immediate difference.  I’m going to try and reboot the AP and 
> see if it sees it then.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 6:57 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> What about extra reporting? That one seems more important than the AirMax 
> setting.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> From: "Rory Conaway" 
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:55:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
> 
> So what’s weird is that I have a second Rocket AC that has 45 clients on it, 
> and 3 of them came up with names.  The rest are blank.  I checked the AirMax 
> settings and all of them are set at Base, the ones that came up and the ones 
> that don’t.  On the ones that came up, the distance is correct.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:51 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> We will be testing that tonight. 
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Jesse DuPont
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:47 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Agreed. But it is relevant to the general priority upstream traffic from the 
> SM is given, including this meta information. I shouldn't have had to change 
> it from NONE to get them to stay reliably reachable and  passing traffic, but 
> alas, I did so there's something there.
> 
> Anyway, I wasn't necessarily advocating that he should have to change it, I 
> was more saying that "this" is what I have, how is it different from yours, 
> since our experience was different.
> 
> I also agree, probably just Extra Reporting is disabled on the SMs.
> 
> Jesse DuPont
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> 
> On 2/28/17 2:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I don't believe Airmax priority is relevant to the extra reporting...
> 
>  
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>  
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Jesse DuPont  
> wrote:
> Yeah, not so much turning AirMax off, but setting the AirMax Priority to 
> something other than None.
> 
> Jesse DuPont
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> 
> On 2/28/17 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I've always had it on.  I can't remember ever seeing it off...
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>  
> On Feb 28, 2017 3:41 PM, "Rory Conaway"  wrote:
> I will check.  I know we have extra reporting turned off as that was pretty 
> much mandatory in earlier versions of firmware on the 802.11n radios.  We 
> never turned on extra reporting on the CPE side, never had any reason to.  We 
> usually didn’t enable it unless we had an issue we were troubleshooting.
> 
> Jesse, I will make those 

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

[Matt Hoppes]

LAG

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:35, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> 
> Correction: As of 2000, most gigabit channel-bonding schemes use the IEEE 
> standard of Link Aggregation which was formerly clause 43 of the IEEE 802.3 
> standard added in March 2000 by the IEEE 802.3ad task force.[4] Nearly every 
> network equipment manufacturer quickly adopted this joint standard over their 
> proprietary standards.
> 
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>> wrote:
>> LACP is like 1990 dude...
>> 
>> 
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>>> Where do you guys find the time to keep up with all that new stuff?
>>>  
>>>  
>>> From: Matt Hoppes
>>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:15 PM
>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor
>>>  
>>> Yup
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:13, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Netonix and LACP?
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>  
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>>> What would be the easiest way to get these working into your network?  A 
>>>>> router at each end of the link?
>>>>> We use a lot of Netonix, but those are not routers.
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> From: Matt Hoppes
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:33 AM
>>>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor
>>>>>  
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 13:42, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can we upgrade a link on the fly?
>>>>>> In other words, we can not do both sides of a link at the same time.  So 
>>>>>>will a link work with one end being just the one AF5x and the 
>>>>>> other end the 2 af5x?
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

[Matt Hoppes]

Use it in the network? :)

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:31, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
> 
> Where do you guys find the time to keep up with all that new stuff?
>  
>  
> From: Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:15 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor
>  
> Yup
> 
>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:13, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Netonix and LACP?
>>  
>>  
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>  
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>>> What would be the easiest way to get these working into your network?  A 
>>> router at each end of the link?
>>> We use a lot of Netonix, but those are not routers.
>>>  
>>>  
>>> From: Matt Hoppes
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:33 AM
>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor
>>>  
>>> Yes.
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 13:42, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Can we upgrade a link on the fly?
>>>> In other words, we can not do both sides of a link at the same time.  So 
>>>> will a link work with one end being just the one AF5x and the other end 
>>>> the 2 af5x?
>>>>  
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>> 
>>  
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

[Matt Hoppes]

Yup

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:13, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> 
> Netonix and LACP?
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>> What would be the easiest way to get these working into your network?  A 
>> router at each end of the link?
>> We use a lot of Netonix, but those are not routers.
>>  
>>  
>> From: Matt Hoppes
>> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:33 AM
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor
>>  
>> Yes.
>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 13:42, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we upgrade a link on the fly?
>>> In other words, we can not do both sides of a link at the same time.  So 
>>> will a link work with one end being just the one AF5x and the other end the 
>>> 2 af5x?
>>>  
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Frills over function? (warning

[Matt Hoppes]

How did you load the firmware and config file on the radio?

Try using a modern browser like safari or Firefox. 

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 19:33, James Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com> wrote:
> 
> Try to read this in the daylight...
> 
>> On Feb 22, 2017 7:25 PM, "Stuart Pierce" <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:
>> I don't have a problem with it even on my cheap andriod phone.
>> 
>> On Wed, February 22, 2017 6:37 pm, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> > Even on your phone??
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Matt Hoppes <
>> > mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> At first I was amazed. I was petrified. Thinking airos8 wasn't by my
>> >> side. But then I had to get along.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Oh yes. Airos8 and I are really friendly guests. I just love the way it
>> >>  works. It has very few quirks. Oh 5 just die.
>> >>
>> >> Seriously though. I love 8.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 17:04, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If it makes you feel any better, ePMP made their GUI work beautifully
>> >> well with phones in 3.2.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Josh Luthman
>> >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> >> 1100 Wayne St
>> >> Suite 1337
>> >> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Kees H <wi...@calbroadband.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> UBNT,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry if I offend someone here, but why could you not leave the gui
>> >>> as it was.  Today I installed our first PBM5 AC.  First I noticed that
>> >>> AirOS V8
>> >>> is not fully functional in android’s default internet browser.
>> >>>
>> >>> OK We will try Chrome.  After fighting Chrome, which wants the login
>> >>> name to start wit a Cap, I got into the unit and was able to access
>> >>> the wireless tab.  Ran a scan to find our radio and SSID and what do I
>> >>> run into.  Some wizard programmer with a way too big a monitor on his
>> >>> desk, must have decided that it looks really cool to have the
>> >>> information show up, -not the standard black on white-, but white on
>> >>> black.  Have you ever tried to read a screen white on black on a smart
>> >>> phone in the sun?
>> >>>
>> >>> Why do you have to change what is working so well?  AirOS v5X works
>> >>> excellent on an android. Did you guys ever check with people who
>> >>> actually use this for a living?
>> >>>
>> >>> The dashboard of the Airfiber AirOS8 is way too cluttered to be of
>> >>> efficient use.  Why the shading and the funky colors?  I could go on
>> >>> but I think you get my drift.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Funky over function?.  Pulleazeee.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Frills over function? (warning

[Matt Hoppes]

At first I was amazed. I was petrified. Thinking airos8 wasn't by my side. But 
then I had to get along. 

Oh yes. Airos8 and I are really friendly guests. I just love the way it works. 
It has very few quirks. Oh 5 just die. 

Seriously though. I love 8. 

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 17:04, Josh Luthman  wrote:
> 
> If it makes you feel any better, ePMP made their GUI work beautifully well 
> with phones in 3.2.
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Kees H  wrote:
>> UBNT,
>>  
>> Sorry if I offend someone here, but why could you not leave the gui as it 
>> was.  Today I installed our first PBM5 AC.  First I noticed that AirOS V8 is 
>> not  fully functional in android’s default internet browser.
>>  
>> OK We will try Chrome.  After fighting Chrome, which wants the login name to 
>> start wit a Cap, I got into the unit and was able to access the wireless 
>> tab.  Ran a scan to find our radio and SSID and what do I run into.  Some 
>> wizard programmer with a way too big a monitor on his desk, must have 
>> decided that it looks really cool to have the information show up, -not the  
>> standard black on white-, but white on black.  Have you ever tried to read a 
>> screen white on black on a smart phone in the sun?
>>  
>> Why do you have to change what is working so well?  AirOS v5X works 
>> excellent on an android.
>> Did you guys ever check with people who actually use this for a living?
>>  
>> The dashboard of the Airfiber AirOS8 is way too cluttered to be of efficient 
>> use.  Why the shading and the funky colors?  I could go on but I think you 
>> get my drift.
>>  
>>  
>> Funky over function?.  Pulleazeee.
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side

[Matt Hoppes]

Are you able to log
Into the remote radio if you go on site?

> On Nov 19, 2016, at 22:43, t...@byhalia.net wrote:
> 
> David,
> 
> I just had it happen again twice in a 4 hour period tonight for one tower
> that I reported originally on the 8th of November, Tower 1:  M5 5.6.4 XW
> to M5 5.6.4 XW, channel is 34 and airmax is 97% quality and 94% capacity,
> noise floor -101dBm and ccq is 99%.  I am on 30 mhz width and getting
> 216.666mbs/216.666mbs.  The weather has turned cold, but never had that
> problem through other winters.  A simple reboot remotely of the Station
> side of the backhaul reconnects everything perfectly.
> 
> This had not happened for 2 weeks, then twice in one evening on the same
> tower.  I have not tried to upgrade firmware from the XW 5.6.4 as I too
> have checked forums and come up with the same responsesNo answer to
> why or how to fix it and the firmware updates did not change it either
> from what I read.  I have had best luck with XW 5.6.4 to date, so was
> trying to stay that direction until I tested or heard otherwise.
> 
> Troy
> 
>> Long read, but wanted get out what we have found. Still don't have a
>> workable solution other than replacing links with Mimosa which we are
>> doing
>> now to all the P to P links.
>> 
>> Here's a snipit of what a log shows.
>> 
>> Nov  15 13:42:12 wireless: ath0 Received disassoc from
>> 80:2a:a8:a8:56:81. Reason: Unspecified reason (1).
>> Nov  15 13:42:13 wireless: ath0 New Access Point/Cell
>> address:Not-Associated
>> Nov  15 13:42:14 wireless: ath0 New Access Point/Cell
>> address:80:2A:A8:A8:56:81
>> 
>> All these have Airmax quality and capacity numbers above 90% - SNR's above
>> 30 some near 50
>> 
>> Point to Point PBE-M5-400 V 5.6.2 firmware - 20M Channel - DFS 5500 - 2.3
>> m
>> link. No DFS issues. The link will stop passing traffic. Logging into the
>> AP shows station at 144/6.5 rate. If I kick the station it will
>> re-associate and work again - never more than a week sometimes less than a
>> day. Looking at the station on the AP side the TX combined signal goes
>> away
>> and comes back a couple seconds later. A reboot of the AP looks to fix it
>> as well as a kick of the station.
>> 
>> Point to Point NB-13's V5.6.3 firmware - 10M channel - 1.2m link - power
>> turned down - quality and capacity well above 95%. No interference issues.
>> Ran for a few months with no problems. Started having the same issue as
>> above radios. I noticed the latency number would jump to 100-200-500ms.
>> Tried updating from 5.6.3 to 5.6.5 eventually to worked up to 5.6.9 - same
>> issue persists.
>> 
>> Point to Point NB25 to PBE-M5-400 V5.6.3 on both - 30M channel - 5.6 mile
>> -
>> non DFS. This is the first link I started having issues with. Thought it
>> was related to XM to XW hardware. Replaced one side with a PBE-400 and the
>> issue continued although it took a few weeks to show up. I did change the
>> frequency a weeks ago from 5755 to 5760 it seemed to lasted longer without
>> dropping but still drops off . I've tried from 5.6.3 through 5.6.9 with no
>> success.
>> 
>> Point to Point NB25 to PBE-M5-400 V5.6.2 on both - 20M channel - 2.8 mile
>> DFS link. No issues at all until I replaced the NB25 with a NBE-400. Now I
>> see 144.444/6.5 on it multiple times per day. The AP was the NB25.
>> 
>> I had an NSM2 feeding 7 clients 10M channel - mixed NS2, M2, M2L, NB13's
>> and NB18's - Replaced the AP with a PBE-M2400 to focus the energy down a
>> road and started having issues with it a couple weeks later.  Replaced all
>> the clients that weren't XW hardware and the issue continues.
>> 
>> PBE-M2-400 AP feeding 2 NB13 and 1 PBE-M2-400 client. All clients have the
>> same issue, not always at the same time. I usually kick all three clients
>> so as not to deal with the issue multiple times per day. Again, have
>> updated firmware from 5.6.2 to 5.6.9 over the last month to no avail.
>> 
>> I've tried all versions of firmware between 5.6.2 and 5.6.9  No beta yet
>> but in reading the beta forum I don't expect it would help. Others
>> reporting similar problems all the way through rc15 beta.
>> 
>> I see in the Ubiquiti forums folks with similar issues being reported but
>> no fix or what seems an acknowledgement of the issue. Any ideas ?
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Clay that is exactly what is happening.  Issue is weather is incredible
>>> for October and November as well as these are long standing connections
>>> and
>>> not new crimps.
>>> 
>>> Simple reboot remotely through Air Control or directly connected to
>>> station side restores connection.
>>> 
>>> I was reviewing beta firmware,  but unsure if it would fix this issue.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Troy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>> 
>>>  Original message 
>>> From: Clay Stewart 
>>> Date: 

Re: [Ubnt_users] Any WDS Bug in XW 5.6.9?

[Matt Hoppes]

Do you have wds enabled on both radios?

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 08:33, James Wilson  wrote:
> 
> Not much help here, but we haven't run into any of our radios having any 
> problem passing along or receiving DHCP on any of our radios with any 
> versions of firmware.
> 
> 
>> On Nov 1, 2016 8:13 AM, "Chris Fabien"  wrote:
>> I just upgraded a backhaul link from old airgrid M5s to Powerbeam M5s 
>> running XW 5.6.9. This link runs from a main tower with a router on an OSPF 
>> ring to a remote repeater which is just bridged back to the main tower. The 
>> main tower has a mikrotik doing DHCP relay back to our powercode BMU DHCP 
>> server. The link has WDS enabled to make it transparent.
>> 
>> After upgrading the link, I have a problem where after some time, a few 
>> hours or a few days, the CPEs past the link (ubnt and ePMP) cannot renew 
>> their DHCP lease. Rebooting the backhaul radios fixes it. The remote tower 
>> just has a dumb switch and has been in service and stable for years with the 
>> previous airgrid link. The link has good signal and no signs of 
>> interference. Nothing unusual shows up in the logs on either end .
>> 
>> Anyone seen this behavior or any ideas? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS on AC

[Matt Hoppes]

It sounds like you're confusing DFS and auto channel selection. Which is your 
question about?

> On Oct 20, 2016, at 13:13, Ethan E. Dee  wrote:
> 
> So DFS on the AC lites is basically a sham from what I can tell.
> 
> I pick a dfs channel and the rocket picks it's own channel. Usually a 
> channel with much higher noise/interference.
> 
> I use the frequency list and it does me no good.
> 
> In addition, I have lot's of frequencies that are in the -90's for noise 
> and 'auto' picks channels in the -75 to -85. I don't understand the 
> channel selection for these at all.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> -- 
> Ethan Dee
> Network Admin
> Globalvision
> 864 704 3600
> e...@globalvision.net
> 
> gv-supp...@globalvision.net
> 864 467 1333
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

[Matt Hoppes]

There is. 

> On Oct 2, 2016, at 19:29, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> 
> The 400?  I'm thinking there's a lip on the L bracket so you can't do that.
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> 
>> On Oct 2, 2016 7:19 PM, "Jesse DuPont" <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote:
>> No, not turn it upside down, it's still cable exit side down, just the 
>> u-bolt is flipped the other side (inside) of the L-bracket. It gains a 
>> couple of inches of offset, but not nearly as good as the NanoBridges were.
>> 
>> Jesse DuPont
>> 
>> Network Architect
>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
>> Celerity Networks LLC
>> 
>> Celerity Broadband LLC
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>> 
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10/2/16 5:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>> Eth port collects water
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 2, 2016 6:39 PM, "Jesse DuPont" <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> You CAN flip them so long as you don't need 2 things:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) to do much in the way of down tilt (up tilt is fine);
>>>> 2) need to view the tilt tick marks.
>>>> 
>>>> It does work the other way...
>>>> 
>>>> Jesse DuPont
>>>> 
>>>> Network Architect
>>>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
>>>> Celerity Networks LLC
>>>> 
>>>> Celerity Broadband LLC
>>>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>>>> 
>>>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/2/16 5:44 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
>>>>> Nope not first time, but first time publicly expressing my extreme
>>>>> disappointment in the engineering design of the mount. I did express my
>>>>> displeasure on the dim led lights when they first arrived on the scene.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ( Now really I cuss each time I go do an install with these and don't want
>>>>> to backtrack in models )
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now it looks like an opportunity for an adapter to be made for these
>>>>> doesn't it.hint  hint  hint
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh yea and while I'm at it.bring back mFi !!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, October 1, 2016 9:54 pm, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>>> Is this your first time ordering power beams?  I said this the day I got
>>>>>> one to test.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We keep a supply of NanoBridges around for when we need to flip.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 2016, at 21:44, Stuart Pierce <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Seriously, I do like the new ethernet door, but what is up with not
>>>>>>> being able to flip the mount !?!?!?!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ___
>>>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

[Matt Hoppes]

Wait. He was suggesting to turn the entire thing over

> On Oct 2, 2016, at 19:16, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> 
> Eth port collects water
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> 
>> On Oct 2, 2016 6:39 PM, "Jesse DuPont" <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote:
>> You CAN flip them so long as you don't need 2 things:
>> 
>> 1) to do much in the way of down tilt (up tilt is fine);
>> 2) need to view the tilt tick marks.
>> 
>> It does work the other way...
>> 
>> Jesse DuPont
>> 
>> Network Architect
>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
>> Celerity Networks LLC
>> 
>> Celerity Broadband LLC
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>> 
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10/2/16 5:44 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
>>> Nope not first time, but first time publicly expressing my extreme
>>> disappointment in the engineering design of the mount. I did express my
>>> displeasure on the dim led lights when they first arrived on the scene.
>>> 
>>> ( Now really I cuss each time I go do an install with these and don't want
>>> to backtrack in models )
>>> 
>>> Now it looks like an opportunity for an adapter to be made for these
>>> doesn't it.hint  hint  hint
>>> 
>>> Oh yea and while I'm at it.bring back mFi !!!
>>> 
>>> On Sat, October 1, 2016 9:54 pm, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>> Is this your first time ordering power beams?  I said this the day I got
>>>> one to test.
>>>> 
>>>> We keep a supply of NanoBridges around for when we need to flip.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 1, 2016, at 21:44, Stuart Pierce <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Seriously, I do like the new ethernet door, but what is up with not
>>>>> being able to flip the mount !?!?!?!
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>> 
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

[Matt Hoppes]

You're going to have to produce a picture or something. I never figured out a 
way. 

> On Oct 2, 2016, at 18:39, Jesse DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote:
> 
> You CAN flip them so long as you don't need 2 things:
> 
> 1) to do much in the way of down tilt (up tilt is fine);
> 2) need to view the tilt tick marks.
> 
> It does work the other way...
> 
> Jesse DuPont
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> 
>> On 10/2/16 5:44 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
>> Nope not first time, but first time publicly expressing my extreme
>> disappointment in the engineering design of the mount. I did express my
>> displeasure on the dim led lights when they first arrived on the scene.
>> 
>> ( Now really I cuss each time I go do an install with these and don't want
>> to backtrack in models )
>> 
>> Now it looks like an opportunity for an adapter to be made for these
>> doesn't it.hint  hint  hint
>> 
>> Oh yea and while I'm at it.bring back mFi !!!
>> 
>> On Sat, October 1, 2016 9:54 pm, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> Is this your first time ordering power beams?  I said this the day I got
>>> one to test.
>>> 
>>> We keep a supply of NanoBridges around for when we need to flip.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 1, 2016, at 21:44, Stuart Pierce <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Seriously, I do like the new ethernet door, but what is up with not
>>>> being able to flip the mount !?!?!?!
>>>> 
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] POE POWERED SWITCHES

[Matt Hoppes]

Netonix?

> On Sep 16, 2016, at 23:28, Brian - Winters Broadband 
>  wrote:
> 
> MikroTik RB750P-PBr2  5 port  $69
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Shawn Burgei
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 8:25 PM
> To: Adair Winter via Members ; members-boun...@wispa.org;
> ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] POE POWERED SWITCHES
> 
> What does everyone recommend for a Poe powered switch? Outdoor obviously. 
> 
> Thanks
> Shawn 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Streakwave has quit selling new UBNT?

[Matt Hoppes]

Where did you get this?

> On Aug 30, 2016, at 11:47, Jerry Head  wrote:
> 
> When?
> Why?
> What did I miss?
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC radios droping stations

[Matt Hoppes]

Try 8. I upgraded against my will and it's been very solid.   I know. I know. 

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 20:06, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 7.2.4
> 
> 
>> On Aug 5, 2016 6:40 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> 
>> wrote:
>> What software version?
>> 
>>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 18:23, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We had a test AC radio up for the past 7 months testing it and found it 
>>> would drop stations until reboot.  We thought this was a defect in the 
>>> early models because sofrware never fixed it.
>>> 
>>> We replaced this unti with one of the newer AC Prism with the GPS and its 
>>> doing exactly the same thing.
>>> 
>>> This makes me think there is some other issue.
>>> 
>>> Anyone know what this is?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Alex Phillips
>>> CEO and General Manager
>>> RBNS.net
>>> HighSpeedLink.net
>>> WISPA.org Board of Directors  (2011-2016)
>>> WISPA President (2015-2016)
>>> 540-908-3993
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC radios droping stations

[Matt Hoppes]

What software version?

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 18:23, alex phillips  wrote:
> 
> We had a test AC radio up for the past 7 months testing it and found it would 
> drop stations until reboot.  We thought this was a defect in the early models 
> because sofrware never fixed it.
> 
> We replaced this unti with one of the newer AC Prism with the GPS and its 
> doing exactly the same thing.
> 
> This makes me think there is some other issue.
> 
> Anyone know what this is?
> 
> 
> Alex Phillips
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> WISPA.org Board of Directors  (2011-2016)
> WISPA President (2015-2016)
> 540-908-3993
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

[Matt Hoppes]

You need to use a 24VH port or even better a 48VH. 

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 08:21, Jerry Head  wrote:
> 
> 24v for the AF.
> Grid A/C 110/120 for the Netonix.
> 
>> On 7/24/2016 8:55 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>> What voltage are you powering them with? We have no trouble powering over 40 
>> of the
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 24, 2016 8:27 PM, "Jerry Head"  wrote:
>>> So I have been looking at a new AF5x connection on a Netonix switch. The
>>> Netonix is providing power. I see the AF5x power draw jump up to around
>>> 19.2 watts periodically, it seems the Netonix only goes up to 18 watts.
>>> What is the deal here? Is the AF5x under powered now? Is it affecting
>>> performance? Is the Netonix confused?
>>> What? Opinions are welcome.
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

[Matt Hoppes]

Then you're on the wrong port or using the wrong switch for the job. You're 
over driving the port. 

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 08:22, Jerry Head <li...@blountbroadband.com> wrote:
> 
> 24v. I don't see the option for 24vh
> 
>> On 7/24/2016 8:57 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> Are you running it at:
>> 24V
>> 24VH
>> 48V
>> Or
>> 48VH?
>> 
>> Which netonix model?  Which port number?
>> 
>>> On Jul 24, 2016, at 21:26, Jerry Head <li...@blountbroadband.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So I have been looking at a new AF5x connection on a Netonix switch. The
>>> Netonix is providing power. I see the AF5x power draw jump up to around
>>> 19.2 watts periodically, it seems the Netonix only goes up to 18 watts.
>>> What is the deal here? Is the AF5x under powered now? Is it affecting
>>> performance? Is the Netonix confused?
>>> What? Opinions are welcome.
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

[Matt Hoppes]

Are you running it at:
24V
24VH
48V
Or
48VH?

Which netonix model?  Which port number?

> On Jul 24, 2016, at 21:26, Jerry Head  wrote:
> 
> So I have been looking at a new AF5x connection on a Netonix switch. The 
> Netonix is providing power. I see the AF5x power draw jump up to around 
> 19.2 watts periodically, it seems the Netonix only goes up to 18 watts.
> What is the deal here? Is the AF5x under powered now? Is it affecting 
> performance? Is the Netonix confused?
> What? Opinions are welcome.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] [XL Broadband WISPA] Re: Rocket AC

[Matt Hoppes]

8 seems to fix the reboot needed issue. 

Where do you see a 20 user limit?

> On Jul 24, 2016, at 10:23, Evan Galvin  wrote:
> 
> So with the new UBNT AC you can't put more than 20 clients on an AP?  How is 
> that scalable?
> 
> I wanted to try the AC lineup too.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Evan Galvin
> In Charge of What’s Next
> 
> 10808 W. Monee Manhattan Road,
> Monee, IL 60449
> 
> e e...@xlbroadband.com
> 
> t 815.312.4454  w XLBroadband.com
> 
>> On Jul 15, 2016 12:40 PM, "Peter Kranz"  wrote:
>> I would suggest trying a recent v8 beta release and see if you have the same 
>> problem. This sounds similar to a bug that was in v8 but is corrected in 
>> recent betas.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Peter Kranz
>> www.UnwiredLtd.com
>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
>> Mobile: 510-207-
>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
>> Behalf Of Shawn Burgei
>> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 7:56 AM
>> To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' ; members-boun...@wispa.org
>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anyone else having issues with the ROCKET 5AC PTMP with bandwidth 
>> throughput? We have to reboot the AP at least onces or twice a month to get 
>> the correct bandwidth. Any suggestions? We are running the 7.2.2 firmware.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks in advance!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Dieing Gasp

[Matt Hoppes]

I would love to see dieing gasp functionality added to Ubiquiti gear. 

It would greatly aid the troubleshooting process as we could quickly know if 
the radio died or was simply unplugged. 

Even so asking the end user of the PoE brick has power and can they power cycle 
it only results in success part of the time :/

Same for APs. Did the tower just have a power issue, or did a lightening strike 
just take things out?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?

[Matt Hoppes]

Right but in my experience turning on WDS resolves this problem. 

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 10:45, Ken Patrick <patr...@my9ja.com> wrote:
> 
> The discussion is on 5.6.5 loosing connection like I stated a few weeks 
> back.not about wds. 
> 
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:30 PM Matt Hoppes 
>> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>> What?  Turning on wds makes the Mac of the CPE properly visible.
>> 
>> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 09:54, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Turning on WDS is not an answer to all the worlds woes.  WDS can cause 
>> > issue if you are using MAC authentication from the CPE.  Since the maces 
>> > the CPE MAC transparent.
>> >
>> > Steve Barnes
>> > Wireless Operations Manager
>> > PCSWIN.COM
>> > NLBC.COM
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] 
>> > On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>> > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 8:55 AM
>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
>> >
>> > Make sure WDS is enabled on every client and the AP.
>> >
>> >> On Jun 24, 2016, at 07:36, Jeff Evans <jev...@pennwisp.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We're seeing the same thing, not passing packets, but everything else
>> >> looks normal.
>> >> A reboot of the AP cures it, but no way of knowing until the customer 
>> >> calls.
>> >>
>> >> Jeff
>> >>
>> >> Quoting Kevin Sullivan <kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net>:
>> >>
>> >>> We're seeing something similar. All the stations show associated at
>> >>> normal RSSI levels, but we lose 90% packets or more. A reboot brings
>> >>> the users back online. Seeing the issue on 5.6.6 as well as 6.0beta8
>> >>> (figured it was worth a try). The AP I'm looking at that did this ten
>> >>> minutes ago is an XW.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd roll back to 5.5.x, but can't because of the vulnerability.
>> >>> Anyone know of a stable 5.6.x firmware that works on DFS frequencies?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Kevin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> >>> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:16 AM
>> >>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Same here. Either all stations are dropped until reboot or all RX
>> >>> rates crash to 6.5 until the station is kicked or AP is rebooted.
>> >>> Maddening. I have them all stable but it took different FW
>> >>> combinations each time.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ty
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ty
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Tekwav Lists <tekwavli...@gmail.com> 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Same here.  I show that the STA's are connected, but no data passing
>> >>> nor can I get in the STA's GUI.  This was a major issue a month or
>> >>> so ago for me but it's been quiet with no recent issues once I moved
>> >>> the offending AP's to non-DFS bands.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> JJ
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Rory Conaway
>> >>> <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> We haven’t nailed it down to DFS but yes and it’s very random.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Rory
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> >>> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun

Re: [Ubnt_users] High ping times with Ubiquiti AC 7.2.2.3

[Matt Hoppes]

Screen shot!

> On Jun 12, 2016, at 15:23, Faisal Imtiaz  wrote:
> 
> The rocket AC radios have a very very very nice web interface which will 
> pretty much tell you what is wrong, it takes a bit to get the hang of it...   
> the constellation, local interference, remote interference etc. 
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
> From: "Rory Conaway" 
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 2:33:05 AM
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] High ping times with Ubiquiti AC 7.2.2.3
> I’ve got a user that isn’t even a few hundred feet on a Rocket 5 AC-Lite.  
> Most users on this AP can pull 50-60Mbps with no problem.  This user is 
> getting 2-4Mbps down and 18 up.  Ping times are all over the place to as much 
> as 107ms.  We changed the radio, no difference. 
> 
>  
> 
> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO
> 
> 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
> 
> 602-426-0542
> 
> r...@triadwireless.net
> 
> www.triadwireless.net
> 
>  
> 
> “Who needs brakes?  They just slow you down.” – Racing Theory 101
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeOS conntrack tuning

[Matt Hoppes]

Scott,
Try this. You do really need to increase your contrack size from defaults. 

262144  
   tcp 
{  
  half-open-connections 512 
   loose enable   
 max-retrans 3

> On Jun 10, 2016, at 01:33, Scott Lambert  wrote:
> 
> Thank you for the reply.  I would not keep attempting to make the WebUI
> work, except the guy paying me to set these up specifically does not
> want to type more than he has to.   He's not much of a typist.
> 
> If i could find an equivalent of RouterOS's "/interface monitor-traffic
> ether1" or cisco's "show interfaces GigabitEthernet 0/3", I would never
> load EdgeOS's heavy WebUI.
> 
> I just compared the connection tracking timeouts between EdgeOS and RouterOS.
> 
> It looks to me like RouterOS is at least three times as aggressive
> about getting rid of connections which were likely to be malicious
> traffic.  It also looks to me as though RouterOS autoscales the size of
> the connection tracking table when it gets "too full"; whatever "too
> full" means.  
> 
> The minimum size I've seen is 88088 entries, the maximum on my network
> is somewhere over 472,000 entries on a box which has lots of firewall
> rules, does NAT, and passes 800Mbps during peak hours for more than 1500
> users.  That box is using less than 1GB of RAM.  Maybe I'll just set all
> of the EdgeRouters to use similar settings to that CCR1036.
> 
> Just out of curiosity, how many EdgeRouters do you have deployed?
> 
> Do you use anything between the Juniper and the EdgeRouter Pro?
> 
> I'm at around 100 RouterOS routers in the ISP network.  Several more
> at client businesses.  In ISP networks, I've only used about 10
> ImageStreams and a few dozen Ciscos.  No Junipers, yet.  
> 
> The Ciscos are hands down the reliability champs, followed by
> ImageStream, then RouterOS, then the EdgeRouters, in my experience so
> far.  
> 
> Like you said, it's hard to justify the big brands when MikroTik and
> Ubiquiti have such low cost options in the CCR1009s and the EdgeRouter
> Pros.
> 
> I better get back to looking up how to setup GRE tunnels across the
> Internet and run OSPF across them as a backup path for when the network
> gets partitioned internally on the EdgeRouters.
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:05:03PM -0500, Andrew Duey wrote:
>> Scott,
>> 
>> We have been running the EdgeRouter Pro's for at least a year now and ran
>> Vyatta for a couple years before that.  After reading your frustrations
>> here's a couple observations:
>> 
>> 1) We do NO NAT in our Edgerouters now, but when we did in Vyatta we had
>> the same conntrack issues.  We found you could increase the table size
>> dramatically and that fixed our problems until we could un-NAT everything.
>> I would recommend not doing NAT on those units at all but if you have to
>> you can increase the table sizes to help.
>> 
>> 2) Ours have been crazy stable (given the very low cost of the units).
>> 
>> 3) The web gui is only useful for viewing real-time network information.  I
>> do like that you can see real-time traffic counts, see how routing changes
>> take effect, and see an outage in a heartbeat but the web guy is for
>> information only.  I would STRONGLY recommend that in an ISP environment
>> that ALL configuration be done at the command line.  I found it very
>> friendly and easy to use, and there used to be TONS of peer Vyatta support
>> out there  (Brocade killed a lot of it, but there's still a lot left in
>> other places).
>> 
>> 4) While UBNT's direct support is crap on a good day, I've found that their
>> forums have 90% of the answers I'm looking for and the rest can be gotten
>> with my googlefu and searching for Vyatta examples.
>> 
>> While the $400 EdgeRouter Pro is no Juniper MX160 I've found that they are
>> amazing little boxes given their price point.  We make a point to always
>> keep at least one spare on hand and run them in pairs anyway but so far
>> haven't needed to worry about them too much (knock on wood).
>> 
>> Best of luck with them
>> --Andrew Duey
>> 
>>> On Thursday, June 9, 2016, Scott Lambert  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Warning, this message has not been well editted.  I don't have time to
>>> go back and get it to try to get the tone to match what is intended.  I
>>> have limitted time onsite during which to try to fix issues.  However
>>> "rant"y this sounds, it should sound like frustration rather than anger.
>>> 
>>> I am helping an ISP owner who is trying to transition from one big
>>> bridge to a mostly routed network.  He had ImageStream routers at three
>>> points, two points were BGP upstreams where there is not really enough
>>> bandwidth between the sites to fail over gracefully.  We are working on
>>> that 

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

[Matt Hoppes]

Unless the gear is simply unable to pass the test..just saying. 

I don't think it's a back log at the FCC. I think it's a fundamental hardware 
issue that Ubiquiti is going oh crap. What do we do now?

Now. Why they don't just certify them for passive station DFS I have no idea. 



 On Jan 11, 2015, at 17:28, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 
 Thank you, jackasses.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 From: Jerry Richardson (airCloud) jrichard...@aircloud.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 4:28:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2
 
 You can thank jackasses running non-compliant gear that interfered with FAA 
 traffic radars for slowing the process.
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com wrote:
 
 Well. Unless the hardware fails the DFS test?
 
 
 
 On Jan 11, 2015, at 13:49, Eric Williams {WISP} w...@williamsteldata.com 
 wrote:
 
 Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano Bridge for 
 SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power beam for SU, I only have 
 5700-5800 where all the RF noise is. I’m hoping for some words of wisdom from 
 Ubiquiti like, “Hey, we can do that for you guys and why did we not think of 
 that…..Good Idea, Eric!”  LOL……….All we can do is ask, right?
 
 It’s puzzling to me with the number of subscribers that the WISP industry 
 adds every year and the continual Global WISP awareness, that it takes 6 
 months  for the #1 WISP hardware vendor to get new gear certified with only a 
 hand full of hardware vendors.  So, I will ask has someone pissed someone 
 off?  Who do we need to send flowers or a round of golf to, to get the 
 Ubiquiti test moved to the top of the list so we can have more hardware to 
 serve the underserved?
 
 There is a good chance I will be rolling a truck Monday to change out the SU 
 so I can get out of the RF noise on the AP side.
 
 Thanks to all for the feedback and glad to see I’m not off base to ask for 
 the 100 MHz of non DFS frequencies.
 
  
 Eric Williams W7EMW
 Network Administrator
 9740 Campo Road #211
 Spring Valley Ca 91977
 619-698-3904 Ext 101
 619-415-0070 Dispatch
  
 Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins 
 Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}
  
 WWW.SDWISP.COM
 www.myinternetsucks.com
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 rf-link drops

[Matt Hoppes]

What is the ESD cable grounded to at the bottom?



 On Jan 10, 2015, at 11:49, Kevin Lamothe klamo...@vianet.ca wrote:
 
 We've been having problems with AF24 in winter, mostly with high winds 
 and blowing snow. Other then that, the unit runs fine the rest of the year.
 
 I'm starting to think it's a static discharge problem. The RF side 
 completely drops and a power cycle is required to bring it back online. 
 This unit has already been RMA'd and ethernet run replaced, yes it's a 
 ESD cable. There's about 8 other devices on this tower that don't have 
 this problem.
 
 Has anyone seen anything like this before? or know a way to help with 
 the static build up problems?
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Interface Usage Amounts

[Matt Hoppes]

Yah... I would guess customer ARP traffic internal?  Maybe they are
using some sort of streaming device that does multi-cast?


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 1/5/15 1:54 PM, RickG wrote:
 I imagine it might be helpful if I attached a graphic rather than pdf so
 here it is.
 
 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:37 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Referring to the attached graph: Why do the interfaces show such a
 difference in bytes transferred?
 -- 
 -RickG KyWiFi
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 -RickG KyWiFi
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Advice for a Strict NAT problem on a UBNT radio for Xbox

[Matt Hoppes]

Are you in router mode with a public IP on the radio?


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 12/24/14 11:15 AM, alex phillips wrote:
 I have UPNP turned on but the customer gets a strict nat issue plugged
 straight into the radio bypassing his router so the problem must be on
 my end right?
 
 Suggestions?
 
 -- 
 /*Alex Phillips*/
 CEO and General Manager
 RBNS.net
 HighSpeedLink.net
 *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2016)*
 *WISPA Vice President (2014-2015)*
 *FCC Committee Chairman*
 *540-908-3993*
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Advice for a Strict NAT problem on a UBNT radio for Xbox

[Matt Hoppes]

I have no idea why you'd get that then.  I've never seen that message
while in that mode.

Maybe try setting up DMZ to a single DHCP address on the inside.. that
should pass directly through.


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 12/24/14 11:34 AM, alex phillips wrote:
 yes router mode with a public.
 
 On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Matt Hoppes
 mhop...@indigowireless.com mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com wrote:
 
 Are you in router mode with a public IP on the radio?
 
 
 Matt Hoppes
 Director of Information Technology
 Indigo Wireless
 +1 (570) 723-7312 tel:%2B1%20%28570%29%20723-7312
 
 On 12/24/14 11:15 AM, alex phillips wrote:
  I have UPNP turned on but the customer gets a strict nat issue plugged
  straight into the radio bypassing his router so the problem must be on
  my end right?
 
  Suggestions?
 
  --
  /*Alex Phillips*/
  CEO and General Manager
  RBNS.net
  HighSpeedLink.net
  *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2016)*
  *WISPA Vice President (2014-2015)*
  *FCC Committee Chairman*
  *540-908-3993 tel:540-908-3993*
 
 
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 /*Alex Phillips*/
 CEO and General Manager
 RBNS.net
 HighSpeedLink.net
 *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2016)*
 *WISPA Vice President (2014-2015)*
 *FCC Committee Chairman*
 *540-908-3993*
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams

[Matt Hoppes]

Also not true. I've purchased them from double radius in the last week. 

 On Dec 12, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
 
 Ben
 I was also told by 4 masters like double radius,streakwave,scansource,micro 
 saying that they cant get them anymore and being replaced by nanobeams.
  
 Tim
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Ryan Ghering
 Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:59 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams
  
 Steve, is our rep. But there is never any stock listed and when we call they 
 just sold out
  
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 Hi Ryan - 
  
 Who is your rep from Streakwave?  They have received regular shipments and 
 pulled from our US stock, so getting them should not be a problem.  
  
 Thanks,
 Ben
  
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com 
 wrote:
 Ryan. So do I and I have not seen this shortage. 
 
 On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I havent been able  to find any stock of nanobridges in a few months. We were 
 forced into using other brands of gear because of this in some towers. Not 
 happy And we primarily buy from baltic and streak 
 
 On Friday, December 12, 2014, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote:
 Latest estimate is still next year. Sounds like first quarter.
  
 -Ty
  
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Forbes Mercy wi...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 I admittedly don't keep up as I should on this list so I'm probably
 bringing something up that has been talked about a lot, sorry.  I am out
 of NanoBridges and while I'd dearly like to move to NanoBeams because
 they are a much nicer radio, they are boat anchors without DFS
 capabilities.  Why it's taken longer to get this certification is beyond
 me but before I buy another few hundred NanoBridges (when I am lucky
 enough to find a supplier that still carries them) I'd like to know if
 the certification is any closer?
 
 Thanks,
 Forbes Mercy
 Washington Broadband, Inc.
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 
 
 -- 
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
  
 --
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams

[Matt Hoppes]

I'll be glad to sell units to any of you guys who can't find them :). Let me 
know how many you want. 

 On Dec 12, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 
 Please forward any information you have on this...this is not accurate at 
 all.  In fact multiple distributors picked up product from our safety stock 
 here in past couple of weeks.
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com wrote:
 We got told the same as Tim did.. 
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
 Ben
 
 I was also told by 4 masters like double radius,streakwave,scansource,micro 
 saying that they cant get them anymore and being replaced by nanobeams.
 
  
 
 Tim
 
  
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Ryan Ghering
 Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:59 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams
 
  
 
 Steve, is our rep. But there is never any stock listed and when we call 
 they just sold out
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 
 Hi Ryan - 
 
  
 
 Who is your rep from Streakwave?  They have received regular shipments and 
 pulled from our US stock, so getting them should not be a problem.  
 
  
 
 Thanks,
 
 Ben
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com 
 wrote:
 
 Ryan. So do I and I have not seen this shortage. 
 
 
 On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I havent been able  to find any stock of nanobridges in a few months. We 
 were forced into using other brands of gear because of this in some towers. 
 Not happy And we primarily buy from baltic and streak 
 
 On Friday, December 12, 2014, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Latest estimate is still next year. Sounds like first quarter.
 
  
 
 -Ty
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Forbes Mercy wi...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 
 I admittedly don't keep up as I should on this list so I'm probably
 bringing something up that has been talked about a lot, sorry.  I am out
 of NanoBridges and while I'd dearly like to move to NanoBeams because
 they are a much nicer radio, they are boat anchors without DFS
 capabilities.  Why it's taken longer to get this certification is beyond
 me but before I buy another few hundred NanoBridges (when I am lucky
 enough to find a supplier that still carries them) I'd like to know if
 the certification is any closer?
 
 Thanks,
 Forbes Mercy
 Washington Broadband, Inc.
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 
 
 -- 
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
  
 
 --
 
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 -- 
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] While Ben is paying attention to suggestions...

[Matt Hoppes]

I have 3 mile AF24 hops that maintain full modulation in the eastern US...

On 12/11/14, 1:24 PM, Ben Moore wrote:
 40 mile AF24 links are some of the shorter ones...
 
 I don't see a dual band AF happening...Way too many
 variables/challenges.  How come you wouldn't just do AF24 as primary and
 AF5 as backup with failover?  
 
 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Mike Hammett
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 
 Dual band AF. AF5 and AF24 in one unit. You can enjoy epic
 throughput most of the time, but then you can reliably put the AF
 further apart than 2 miles (in the Chicago metro anyway). I assume
 you'll respond with forum posts of people doing 40 mile AF24 shots,
 but no. I want full speed and reliable.
 
 I think that sort of setup would be great in most units above 10 GHz.
 
 Could optionally allow you to disable the 5 gig radio until needed.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

[Matt Hoppes]

Thank you Ben!  I know a lot of people want backwards compatibility...
but I for one want forwards movement!  Even if it ultimately means no
backwards compatibility.

On 12/9/14, 3:21 PM, Ben Moore wrote:
 Backwards compatibility is planned, but will be some time before being
 implemented (will ask team for update on timeline).  There are a lot of
 features/products that will go into AC prior to adding backwards
 compatibility (making sure these are solid first before adding more
 variables).
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
 mailto:st...@pcswin.com wrote:
 
 Ben, I asked before but haven’t gotten word, can you speak to the
 Backwards compatibility of the new units?
 
 __ __
 
 *Steven Barnes*
 
 GM
 
 PCSWIN.com
 
 Howard LLC.
 
 __ __
 
 *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:14 PM
 
 
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 __ __
 
 Yes, difference is airprism...and the fact that this one is PTP
 locked (the lite will do both PTMP and PTP).
 
 __ __
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
 mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 
 Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only
 Rocket I have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p
 
 So is the only difference with this new Rocket AirPrism, or are
 there other  changes as well? 
 
 
 
 
 *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Ben Moore
 [ben.mo...@ubnt.com mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:27 PM
 
 
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 __ __
 
 ;-)  I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being
 added (especially the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that
 can be done with that).  Will send out some details shortly on
 PTMP networks in the wild ;)
 
 __ __
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard
 mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 
 ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the
 same ones. I guess I should actually read stuff. This is
 what happens when you don't make new stuff look different :p
 
 
 
 
 
 *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike
 Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:22 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 Oh, so the non-Lite Rocket. Sorry.
 
 The e-mail didn't really make it clear that there were new
 things, just the same platform hype we had 14 months ago. I
 didn't read it all, just skimmed it because it didn't look
 any different.
 
 Ohhh, so the PtMP works now with the new software?
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
 
 
 
 
 *From: *Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com
 mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:20:19 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 The 3 new products announced today: 
 
 __ __
 
 R5AC-PTP - Rocket w/AirPrism, PTP only
 
 NBE-5AC-19 - 19dB NanoBeam
 
 PBE-5AC-620 - 620mm PowerBeam
 
 __ __
 
 Also, all of the software updates:
 
 __ __
 
 http://www.ubnt.com/broadband/software/
 
 __ __
 
 Some highlights:
 
 __ __
 
 - Dedicated spectrum analysis (persistent)

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

[Matt Hoppes]

Mind blown. 

 On Dec 9, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 
 11n CPE's will have ability to work with 11AC AP's...This will allow you to 
 transition a tower.  Note that 11ac speeds will not be as good as 100% AC 
 network, but 11ac CPE's that you deploy will still be better than 11n.
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 That's what I've been assuming too... 
 
 Ben, can you tell us whether it's going to be backwards compatibility added 
 to the AC series, or forward compatibility added to the M series? 
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
 of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:36 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 I'm guessing it'll be like M series vs. legacy. Eventually V6 will be the 
 M-series connection to the AC.   I'm guessing...
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 From: Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 2:16:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 Ben, I asked before but haven’t gotten word, can you speak to the Backwards 
 compatibility of the new units?
 
  
 
 Steven Barnes
 
 GM
 
 PCSWIN.com
 
 Howard LLC.
 
  
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Ben Moore
 Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:14 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
  
 
 Yes, difference is airprism...and the fact that this one is PTP locked (the 
 lite will do both PTMP and PTP).
 
  
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 
 Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only Rocket I have 
 that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p
 
 So is the only difference with this new Rocket AirPrism, or are there other  
 changes as well?
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
 of Ben Moore [ben.mo...@ubnt.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:27 PM
 
 
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
  
 
 ;-)  I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added 
 (especially the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that can be done with 
 that).  Will send out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;)
 
  
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 
 ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the same ones. I 
 guess I should actually read stuff. This is what happens when you don't make 
 new stuff look different :p
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
 of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:22 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 Oh, so the non-Lite Rocket. Sorry.
 
 The e-mail didn't really make it clear that there were new things, just the 
 same platform hype we had 14 months ago. I didn't read it all, just skimmed 
 it because it didn't look any different.
 
 Ohhh, so the PtMP works now with the new software?
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 From: Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:20:19 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 The 3 new products announced today:
 
  
 
 R5AC-PTP - Rocket w/AirPrism, PTP only
 
 NBE-5AC-19 - 19dB NanoBeam
 
 PBE-5AC-620 - 620mm PowerBeam
 
  
 
 Also, all of the software updates:
 
  
 
 http://www.ubnt.com/broadband/software/
 
  
 
 Some highlights:
 
  
 
 - Dedicated spectrum analysis (persistent)
 
 - CINR (Carrier to Interference and Noise Ratio - accurate assessment of 
 channel conditions
 
 - New diagnostic tools (Ethernet Cabling test, RF Diagnostics, etc...)
 
 - PTMP enabled on R5AC-LITE
 
  
 
 The R5AC-PTMP (AirPrism AP) will be announced shortly.
 
  
 
 Thanks,
 
 Ben
 
  
 
 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 
  We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems with 
 them.
 
 I think the NanoBeam AC might be new... at least I hadn't seen it before, 
 but otherwise, no, nothing new.
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
 of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:07 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 For those of you that have them...  are they working well?
 
 Was there anything new in their announcement today? It didn't seem like it.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
  
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 
 

Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems

[Matt Hoppes]

This is why friends don't let friends use Compliance Test :)

On 12/7/14, 11:24 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 That's what I started working on when I noticed it was in compliance
 test, but I can't have the link die because the Rocket fails to connect
 because it only thinks 5.8 is available when it is allowed DFS and 5150.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Sunday, December 7, 2014 9:56:11 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
 Get out of compliance test?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 9:45 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 
 I can't set a DFS channel as there aren't any available.
 
 This is a link that I probably setup 4 years ago and forgot about
 save for some airControl upgrades over time. I probably went through
 all radios entering the DFS code when I got them in the mail.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Sunday, December 7, 2014 2:17:54 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
 Or just set the channel?  I didn't exactly understand the stranding
 point either. 
 
 On Dec 7, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
 mailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
 
 Set the frequency list to what range you need before you reboot.
 
  
 
 rory
 
  
 
 *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
 *Sent:* Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:09 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
  
 
 What is it working on?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 2:07 PM, Mike Hammett
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:
 
 Nope.
 
 I did not reboot after setting country code back to US, though,
 as I don't want to strand them on an unusable 5.8 channel.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
  
 
 
 
 
 *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Sunday, December 7, 2014 1:01:59 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
 The frequencies aren't listed?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 2:00 PM, Mike Hammett
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:
 
 I believe that has been done.
 
 Definitely the reboot both sides.
 
 The DFS checkbox\fields are definitely not there.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
  
 
 
 
 
 *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:47:46 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
 Old rocket, plug in DFS credentials for your company, reboot
 BOTH SIDES.  BOTH.
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 1:45 PM, Mike Hammett
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:
 
 I have some old Rockets (maybe 5.2.1 vintage?). I upgraded them
 as needed throughout the years. The past day or two, performance
 in on part

Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems

[Matt Hoppes]

I don't recall which firmware version the DFS code appeared in. It's definitely 
in 5.5.8. 

Downgrade to 5.5.8. Enter the code. Re-upgrade  to 5.5.10. 

I think you blew past the DFS enable firmware :)

 On Dec 7, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 
 I have some old Rockets (maybe 5.2.1 vintage?). I upgraded them as needed 
 throughout the years. The past day or two, performance in on part of the 
 network has been erratic to say the best of it.
 
 I noticed that they were in Compliance Test mode, but didn't have the input 
 boxes for the DFS stuff, so I must have entered it at one point, but never 
 actually moved over. They were on 5.5.2.
 
 Don't fuck with what works. Well, now it's not working right.
 
 I upgrade to 5.5.4, then 5.5.10. I set the country code to US  no DFS 
 channels show up on the AP.
 
 Do I need to reboot it after setting it to US so that I can get the DFS 
 channels?
 
 A reset to defaults and starting over is kinda out of the question at the 
 moment.
 
 Any other ideas?
 
 If I have to climb to replace radios, ePMPs are going up instead.
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems

[Matt Hoppes]

Or just set the channel?  I didn't exactly understand the stranding point 
either. 

 On Dec 7, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
 
 Set the frequency list to what range you need before you reboot.
  
 rory
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:09 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
  
 What is it working on?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 2:07 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 Nope.
 
 I did not reboot after setting country code back to US, though, as I don't 
 want to strand them on an unusable 5.8 channel.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
  
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 1:01:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
 The frequencies aren't listed?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 2:00 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 I believe that has been done.
 
 Definitely the reboot both sides.
 
 The DFS checkbox\fields are definitely not there.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
  
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:47:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
 
 Old rocket, plug in DFS credentials for your company, reboot BOTH SIDES.  
 BOTH.
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 On Dec 7, 2014 1:45 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 I have some old Rockets (maybe 5.2.1 vintage?). I upgraded them as needed 
 throughout the years. The past day or two, performance in on part of the 
 network has been erratic to say the best of it.
 
 I noticed that they were in Compliance Test mode, but didn't have the input 
 boxes for the DFS stuff, so I must have entered it at one point, but never 
 actually moved over. They were on 5.5.2.
 
 Don't fuck with what works. Well, now it's not working right.
 
 I upgrade to 5.5.4, then 5.5.10. I set the country code to US  no DFS 
 channels show up on the AP.
 
 Do I need to reboot it after setting it to US so that I can get the DFS 
 channels?
 
 A reset to defaults and starting over is kinda out of the question at the 
 moment.
 
 Any other ideas?
 
 If I have to climb to replace radios, ePMPs are going up instead.
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Weird site survey activity

[Matt Hoppes]

It has an odd cache issue sometimes.


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 12/1/14, 11:22 AM, Kees H wrote:
 Are youtalking about site survey or airview?
  
 
 - Original Message -
 *From:* Josh Luthman mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent:* Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:59 PM
 *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Weird site survey activity
 
 I'm wondering how long the site survey page takes to refresh.  I've
 got a scan on it showing a backhaul that is/was 5660 but I've
 changed that to 5765 about 20 minutes ago.  I manually scan and
 still see it on the wrong frequency...
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] airFiber Surge Arresters

[Matt Hoppes]

What is everyone using as surge arresters for your airFiber installs?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] airFiber Surge Arresters

[Matt Hoppes]

From their website:



Applications

Installed at large colocation sites such as a NOC
Prevent damage to the AP and the other NOC equipment

Fail
I lost more than I would have had I not had them in-line.  Have never
had a surge arrester perform the way theirs did, and I've never been
able to get any kind of answer out of them.

I can't risk that kind of experience with my business.

On 12/1/14, 1:00 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
 Because the WBH surge arrestors I used previously shorted out and blew
 up my switch when they took a hit.  Never again.
 
 On 12/1/14, 12:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 I don't have any AFs, but I'm not sure why you'd go anywhere other than
 BeeHive for your surge arrestors.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL

 
 *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 11:57:36 AM
 *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] airFiber Surge Arresters

 What is everyone using as surge arresters for your airFiber installs?
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] airFiber Surge Arresters

[Matt Hoppes]

Well, unfortunately, I wasn't able to get ahold of anyone at WBH... left
e-mails, voicemails, etc.  I would love to talk with someone there and
get a straight answer as I love the form factor and the fact I can
easily and quickly rack mount something like 24 SA but until I can
get a straight answer, I can't use them.

You short any PoE switch and normally you'll at least take out the port,
if not the entire switch -- in the case of a TS.

On 12/1/14, 1:03 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 I remember that thread. I think the conclusion was the UBNT built the
 switch wrong.
 
 I've never heard of Chuck (or Forest for his associated products) ever
 not making it right with a customer, even if it meant a design change
 (for the better).
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
 
 
 *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 12:00:34 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] airFiber Surge Arresters
 
 Because the WBH surge arrestors I used previously shorted out and blew
 up my switch when they took a hit.  Never again.
 
 On 12/1/14, 12:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 I don't have any AFs, but I'm not sure why you'd go anywhere other than
 BeeHive for your surge arrestors.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL

 
 *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 11:57:36 AM
 *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] airFiber Surge Arresters

 What is everyone using as surge arresters for your airFiber installs?
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point

[Matt Hoppes]

?

 On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 
 No. Many newbs come looking for help. These are the guys that hang out in the 
 corner with 786k posts from mutual circle jerks telling you your great ideas 
 are stupid until UBNT starts doing them...  then they're awesome.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 From: Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:22:25 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
 
 
  the elitists that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. 
 
 Is that not the definition of noobs?
  
 
 Too many want to make you suck on the end of a 12 gauge.
 
 It's not even the noobs that bother me, it's the elitists that don't know 
 their ass from a hole in the ground. 
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 From: Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:52:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
 
 Except that the community grass roots camaraderie is what helped build 
 Ubiquiti.  There is a lot of information there and a lot of people willing to 
 help.
  
 Rory
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Kees H
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:51 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
  
 Cesspool of noobs  Yes I concur.
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthman
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:10 AM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
  
 Ubnt kindly asks to keep discussion on the cesspool of noobs that is the 
 public forum.
 
  
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
  
 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Andy Trimmell atrimm...@precisionds.com 
 wrote:
 I thought there was some kind of badmojorisin' about posting beta stuff in 
 the non beta community. Men in white coats and such.knock knock
  
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:50 PM
 
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
  
 PTMP! Want!
  
 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Mike Dudgeon mike.dudg...@ubnt.com wrote:
 I'm just going to leave this here (for those who haven't noticed)..
  
 http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Beta-Blog/airOS-v7-1-Beta3-released/ba-p/1097483
  
 image001.png
  
 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:
 Thank you.
 
 I've had to move to channel filters on 24GHz to keep it workable.
 
 I'd love to see Air Beam in 2.4GHz as well.  That with AirPrizm could restore 
 2.4GHz to usability for others...
 
 --
  
 On 10/27/2014 9:23 PM, Ben Moore wrote:
 Met my quota for answers today :)
  
 Yes, this is also something we are looking to offer in 2.4ghz.  Similar to 
 what we have in UAP-Outdoor+.
 
 Thanks,
 Ben
 
 On Oct 27, 2014, at 6:16 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:
 
 Since you are talking, how about AirPrizm for 2.4GHz?
 
 --
 
 On 10/27/2014 6:40 PM, Ben Moore wrote:
 There are definitely more limitations with 2.4GHz...but there are some 
 performance benefits you can get out of it still...
  
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
 Your  answer posted at the same time.  Is my analysis correct?
  
 Rory
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Ben Moore
 Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 3:31PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
  
 Nothing yet...But it is something we are working on.
  
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote:
 How about 2.4 GHz in the ac?
 
 Phil
  
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 The R5AC-Lite (previously R5AC-PTP-Lite) will also support PTMP with software 
 update.  There will then be additional hardware that will have airPrism built 
 in.
  
 Will provide an update in next few days as to release timeframe.
  
 Thanks,
 Ben
  
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
 Alex I am not sure this is just going to be software only.  It thought it was 
 a whole new Unit optimized for PtMP.
  
 Steven Barnes
 GM
 PCSWIN.com
 Howard LLC.
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of alex phillips
 Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:26 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC Multi Point
  
 Anyone have any idea when the Multi Point Software will be available?
  
 
  
 --
 Alex Phillips
 CEO and General Manager
 RBNS.net
 HighSpeedLink.net
 WISPA.org Board of Directors  (2011-2016)
 WISPA Vice President 

Re: [Ubnt_users] AM-5AC21-120 ??

[Matt Hoppes]

How about a standard 120 with RFArmor?

 On Nov 9, 2014, at 12:36 AM, Bob Pensworth-Lists beeper.bo...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Doe Ubiquiti make a AM-5AC21-120 ?? since I can't find a AM-M-V5G-Ti . By the 
 way the a AM-M-V5G-Ti 
 is not even an option on the stock search list. Anybody got one they'd sell 
 us? I need it for a COLO tower
 with RFI.
  
  
 --
 Bob Pensworth, WA7BOB | General Manager
 CresComm WiFi, LLC | Crescent Key | Peninsula Lions Club
 Serving Washington's Coastal Counties Since 1985
 (360) 642-0858 | WISPA Principal Member
  
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AM-5AC21-120 ??

[Matt Hoppes]

Where did you hear it's discontinued?  I guess it could have been; but I'm not 
aware of that. 

 On Nov 9, 2014, at 4:29 AM, Bob Pensworth-Lists beeper.bo...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 I would of but found some AM-M-V5G-Ti's at a California reseller. Do you know 
 why the AM-M-V5G-Ti has been discontinued?
  
 --
 Bob Pensworth, WA7BOB | General Manager
 CresComm WiFi, LLC | Crescent Key | Peninsula Lions Club
 Serving Washington's Coastal Counties Since 1985
 (360) 642-0858 | WISPA Principal Member
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
 Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 1:11 AM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AM-5AC21-120 ??
  
 How about a standard 120 with RFArmor?
 
 On Nov 9, 2014, at 12:36 AM, Bob Pensworth-Lists beeper.bo...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Doe Ubiquiti make a AM-5AC21-120 ?? since I can't find a AM-M-V5G-Ti . By the 
 way the a AM-M-V5G-Ti 
 is not even an option on the stock search list. Anybody got one they'd sell 
 us? I need it for a COLO tower
 with RFI.
  
  
 --
 Bob Pensworth, WA7BOB | General Manager
 CresComm WiFi, LLC | Crescent Key | Peninsula Lions Club
 Serving Washington's Coastal Counties Since 1985
 (360) 642-0858 | WISPA Principal Member
  
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

[Matt Hoppes]

Just had that happen on a RocketM5. I can't keep up. 

 On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
 
 Can I assume that all the NS5M Locos now have the same processors as the 
 Nanobeams?  They are coming preloaded with XW firmware.  Very confusing.
  
 Rory Conaway
 Triad Wireless
 4226 S. 37th Street
 Phoenix, Az.  85040
 602-426-0542
 r...@triadwireless.net
 www.triadwireless.net
  
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

[Matt Hoppes]

None I've seen so far. 

 On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
 
 Any issues on the new hardware inside the old models?
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 From: Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:18:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
 
 Just had that happen on a RocketM5. I can't keep up. 
 
 On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
 
 Can I assume that all the NS5M Locos now have the same processors as the 
 Nanobeams?  They are coming preloaded with XW firmware.  Very confusing.
  
 Rory Conaway
 Triad Wireless
 4226 S. 37th Street
 Phoenix, Az.  85040
 602-426-0542
 r...@triadwireless.net
 www.triadwireless.net
  
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

[Matt Hoppes]

Yes... the new cameras are worlds better than the old cameras... but I
never really had any complaints about the old cameras except for the
plastic mounts (which are now metal).

The software, on the other hand, is much much better.

On 11/3/14, 8:30 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 How are you guys liking the UniFi Vision Cameras cameras compared to the
 AirCams?
 
 Is it like ToughCable where oh heavens no, pull down any of the original
 you have, but the new stuff...  good quality at a reasonable price?
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

[Matt Hoppes]

Ok... so keep in mind that's cell phone PICTURE vs moving image.

https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10462907_260238517514852_5960389472087622690_n.jpg?oh=0a2fef678744b3324e6a79ebaca632b8oe=54E0E7BA

https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10173554_245483628990341_3281236013524677922_n.jpg?oh=2540602593552c604a4408134ae9450doe=54F23838

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/t31.0-8/p417x417/131355_212780842260620_1451085761_o.png

There are some photos from the Pro.

On 11/3/14, 8:39 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 I have never been able to get a quality image out of the original
 cameras. They were always less than the quality of my cell phone (as I
 once demonstrated by putting my cell phone immediately adjacent to one
 of the cameras and taking a comparison picture.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, November 3, 2014 7:37:27 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC
 
 Yes... the new cameras are worlds better than the old cameras... but I
 never really had any complaints about the old cameras except for the
 plastic mounts (which are now metal).
 
 The software, on the other hand, is much much better.
 
 On 11/3/14, 8:30 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 How are you guys liking the UniFi Vision Cameras cameras compared to the
 AirCams?

 Is it like ToughCable where oh heavens no, pull down any of the original
 you have, but the new stuff...  good quality at a reasonable price?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

[Matt Hoppes]

Not to say this isn't an issue, but are you even able to use those frequencies 
if there are that many APs around?

 On Nov 3, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Colin Zwiebel co...@netblazr.com wrote:
 
 This is correct. I titled the thread wrong, instead of Major Bug in v5.5.10 
 should have been Major Bug in all v5.5. Any Ubnt STA that sees more than 
 200 networks is unable to connect to anything. 
 
 If we limit our scan list to only 28% of 5GHz frequencies (5160-5280) and we 
 still run into the buffer to large(65535) for realocating issue. This means 
 UNII-1 is very hard for us to use.
 
 I am also concerned that one day the cable goons will flip the switch, double 
 the number of BSSIDs they broadcast, we'll be over the 200 limit, and half of 
 our customers will disconnect. This BSSID issue is really a problem for urban 
 wisps.
 
 There was a proposed fix from the Linux community in 2009
 http://osdir.com/ml/linux-wireless/2009-02/msg00202.html
 I don't know if it was adopted, but the proposed fix from 2009 was to 
 truncate the scan instead of choking and failing to scan at all.
 
 
 v5.6 to the rescue... but not yet
 AirOS version 5.6 (tested v5.6beta5) also has the issue. No fix quite yet.
 
 If the patch is simple, I would really like a v5.5 firmware that doesn't have 
 the buffer to large(65535) I would like to use UNII-1 as soon as possible. It 
 is true, scan list is a workaround, but we are going the wrong way, making it 
 more difficult to change frequencies instead of easier. Because of urban 
 interference issues, I would like change AP frequencies nightly or so, 
 measure statistics, and thus find low-interference channels (we cannot scan 
 in real-time and airview done at night does not reflect daytime 
 interference). As I am forced to make the scan list smaller and smaller, I 
 have to update scan-lists on all STAs before I can change AP frequency, 
 making it much harder to change freq nightly.
 
 
 http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Installation-Troubleshooting/v5-5-10-major-bug-no-SSIDs-in-scan-print-scanning-info-buffer/m-p/1077389/highlight/false#M72179
 
 
 
 Colin
   netBlazr - free your broadband!
 
 
 The wireless telegraph is not difficult to understand. The ordinary telegraph 
 is like a very long cat. You pull the tail in New York, and it meows in Los 
 Angeles. The wireless is the same, only without the cat.
 
 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Matt Hardy m...@ubnt.com wrote:
 To follow up on this thread, we found the issue. This wasn't really a new 
 bug introduced in v5.5.10, but with the additional frequencies the customer 
 was seeing  100 new APs broadcasting in the UNII-1 band (probably lots of 
 indoor APs). There's a limit of 200 APs the radio can pick up when doing a 
 scan, if the radio is in an area with  200 broadcasting SSIDs, it causes 
 this issue (on any firmware) and device stops performing as expected.
 
 We'll be increasing the limit in v5.6, but in the meantime there are 
 workarounds: scan list, different channel bandwidths, etc.
 
 Thanks,
 Matt
 
 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is there a Scan List set?  Cut the number of channels it searches down to a 
 minimum.
 
 Phil
 
 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com 
 wrote:
 XW is different than XM.
 
 On 10/28/14, 12:35 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
  So they say, yet when XW 5.5.10 was placed on XW Ti hardware, the gear
  went nuts for a full 24 hours before we tried 5.5.6. When it was just as
  bad, I went to 5.5.10rc3... same issues. 5.5.10rc2? Everything went back
  to normal. It wasn't just one piece of hardware either, the same
  symptoms were noticed on 4 different APs.
 
  They can say nothing changed all they want-- something changed, there
  were 3rcs, a final, and now tons of bug reports on 5.5.10.
 
  Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
  SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com
 
  On 10/28/2014 05:05 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
  You know there were no changes made to XM v5.5.10 other than adding new
  frequencies, right?
 
  On 10/27/14, 8:57 PM, Colin Zwiebel wrote:
  We are having serious problems with v5.5.10 with 5GHz XM hardware and
  have decided this firmware is not production ready. We using *v5.5.10
  only for links that require UNII-1* frequencies and avoiding in all
  other situations. There is some sort of a bug with scanning for
  available networks, so if your area has few networks, you might observe
  different behavior.
 
  http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Installation-Troubleshooting/v5-5-10-major-bug-no-SSIDs-in-scan-print-scanning-info-buffer/m-p/1072997#U1072997
 
  *AirOS v5.5.10 is not production ready!*
 
  Ubiquiti, it appears you have a major bug and need to revoke the
  release, remove from website, until you get this fixed.
 
 
 
  We have now had 3 clients -- 2 Nanobridges and 1 Rocket M5 -- 
  disconnect
  from their AP with the same behavior: NO SSIDs appear in scan list.
  Downgrade

Re: [Ubnt_users] Odd things happening

[Matt Hoppes]

We are in central Pennsylvania... every AP we've ever taken off a tower
has green corroded Ethernet connections..  we aren't near the
sea enough said :)


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 10/27/14, 5:07 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
 Hi Clay, Thanks for the explanation... 
 
 So based on this,  the grease  would only be needed / functional at the
  'down side' of the cable run, on the radio side it is all behind the cover.
 
 
 
 I am still having a hard time, visualizing the physical aspect of
 this... let's say the cable jacket has a defect, and water is seeping
 into it... the water will end up in the connector, before the grease and
 still short out the cable
 
 
 
 Drip loops are supposed to protect you on the downward side from such
 cable shorting
 
 I can see the use / benefit of the grease in near salt water or marine
 applications, but am having a hard time physically imagining how in a
 normal WISP deployment it is actually creating some sort of protection.
 
 Regards.
 
 
 
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
 
 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
 
 
 
 *From: *Clay Stewart cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, October 27, 2014 3:40:04 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Odd things happening
 
 Faisal, the grease keeps moisture out, completely, which is why car
 wire connectors have it. A single bird peck or wire pull scrape will
 allow water to transverse a wire for it's entire length... Ending up
 in cat5 end or even a POE or Surge.
 
 On Sunday, October 26, 2014, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net
 mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:
 
 
 Perhaps now that we have the season of dew, fall, this could be 
 more prevalent on broken or unseals cat5 ends. Suggest electrolytic grease... 
 Advice I need to listen too myself!
 
 I am going to assume we are talking about Ubiquity Radios, and
 we are talking about the ends that are going into the radio
 
 Since I am a visual learner, can anyone explain to me HOW is the
 moisture  getting into the connector ? 
 
 In all of the radios, the cable / connector is pretty well
 covered to stop them from getting wetand the radios have
 weep holes to protect against humidity related moisture.
 
 (If we are talking about cable/connectors connecting to other
 stuff, other than radios, then I can  understand potential issues )
 
 While I don't have a disagreement over the use of die-electric
 grease, telco's have been using it for a very long time, they
 would even use it on in-door connections, I am asking the need
 for it ?  
 
 w
 Regards,
 
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
 
 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email:
 supp...@snappytelecom.net
 
 
 
 
 *From: *Clay Stewart cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com
 
 JAVASCRIPT-BLOCKED_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com');
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 JAVASCRIPT-BLOCKED_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users@wispa.org');
 *Sent: *Sunday, October 26, 2014 9:30:27 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Odd things happening
 
 Only time this happened to us was due to moisture in cat5 or
 cat5 end. Green cable of course in past... But recently had
 a rocket M2 do this which was a scraped 140' tower tough
 cable carrier which the moisture traveled all the way down
 into cat5 end shorting out pins where it entered a surge
 protection.
 
 Perhaps now that we have the season of dew, fall, this could
 be more prevalent on broken or unseals cat5 ends. Suggest
 electrolytic grease... Advice I need to listen too myself!
 
 On Sunday, October 26, 2014, Mike Hammett
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 
 JAVASCRIPT-BLOCKED_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wispaubntus...@ics-il.net');
 wrote:
 
 It came back shortly after I sent that e-mail. Nothing
 in the Rocket's log to indicate WTF is going on. 80 days
 up time.
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com