Re: [ubuntu-in] Unity and Debdelta on Ubuntu 11.04 i386
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Narendra Diwate narendra.diw...@gmail.com wrote: When I installed Ubuntu 11.04 i386 on my desktop recently, the system launched with Ubuntu Classic rather than Unity interface saying my system does not support it. I have a Desktop with AMD Athlon 64bit X2 3600 processor, 2GB RAM, and Nvidia GeForce 6100 graphics card and use a 15 CRT monitor. Is this config not OK for Unity? What is the minimum required hardware config? Any links where this can be found? Try additional drivers under System. It will detect the necessary driver for your card. Those drivers are proprietary, just for your information. Then after installing, restart your system and try to login as usual. Unity should start. In case you are not able to find Additional drivers. Start jockey-gtk from command line. -- Manish Sinha -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Unity and Debdelta on Ubuntu 11.04 i386
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Manish Sinha m...@manishsinha.net wrote: Try additional drivers under System. It will detect the necessary driver for your card. Those drivers are proprietary, just for your information. Then after installing, restart your system and try to login as usual. Unity should start. In case you are not able to find Additional drivers. Start jockey-gtk from command line. That worked. However the display resolution was only 800*600 which doesn't seem good. Thanks -- Regards Narendra Diwate -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
[ubuntu-in] Need Help to work with PHP in ubuntu11.04
HI All, I'm a newbie to Linux environment. I don't know any shell scripting or any Linux commands. I'm a PHP fresher.I use windows environment ( XAMPP ) in my office. But I want to develop my Joomla websites in my UBUNTU 11.04 OS too. Any Suggestions or links? Please help me. Thanks Regards, SIVA -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Need Help to work with PHP in ubuntu11.04
Install the LAMP server. Link on how you can setup a LAMP server in ubuntu 11.04 http://flossstuff.wordpress.com/2011/05/09/installing-lamp-server-in-ubuntu-11-04-natty-narwhal/ On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:58 PM, rajendra prasad siva edpurp...@gmail.comwrote: HI All, I'm a newbie to Linux environment. I don't know any shell scripting or any Linux commands. I'm a PHP fresher.I use windows environment ( XAMPP ) in my office. But I want to develop my Joomla websites in my UBUNTU 11.04 OS too. Any Suggestions or links? Please help me. Thanks Regards, SIVA -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Au sujet de recommender des suppressions de paquets (était Re: Utilisateur novice de 11.04 souhaite retrouver fonctionalités de base du bureau 10.10 (Gnome?))
2011/5/13 Eric Leduc ele...@leducdubleuet.biz: [...] - C'est quoi la bonne manière pour désinstaller Unity si j'en veux pas du tout sur mon système ? Je ne crois pas qu'il y en ait. Faut-il vraiment le désinstaller? Au pire, c'est pas si grave, voir plus bas pour les détails complets. - Si je fais sudo apt-get purge mono-runtime mono-gac, est-ce aussi quelque chose à ne pas faire ? Possiblement, tout dépend des dépendances de ces paquets. Comme dit plus haut, faut-il vraiment les désinstaller? Les logiciels installés, dans la plupart des cas, ne vont pas contribuer à ralentir l'ordinateur comme c'est souvent le cas ailleurs. Leur impact se limite surtout à l'utilisation d'espace disque, et autant dans le cas de Unity que des paquets mono, ce n'est pas tant que ca. Pour préciser pourquoi je recommande de ne pas désinstaller des paquets comme ca, c'est surtout que s'ils proposent de désinstaller ubuntu-desktop, vous n'aurez alors plus aussi facilement droit aux améliorations de paquets, et aux installations/désinstallations automatique lorsque des paquets ne sont plus supportés, remplacés par d'autres, etc. 'ubuntu-desktop' sert à pousser les informations sur ce qui constitue un bureau Ubuntu, avec toutes ses applications. Autrement dit, les paquets qui ne sont plus nécessaires et devraient se désinstaller resteront sur votre système, tout comme des nouvelles applications par défaut pourraient ne pas être ajoutées. Ca, c'est sans compter les autres problèmes relatifs à désinstaller des paquets sans connaître leurs dépendances. Par exemple, désinstaller evolution (ou plutot evolution-data-server), peut rendre votre bureau Gnome classique pratiquement inutile. Sur le même principe, désinstaller mono-runtime/etc. brisera banshee, tomboy, et probablement d'autres applications qui s'en servent. Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com 4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93 -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
[Ubuntu-QC] Plus lent avec Unity??
Bonjour, Depuis que j'ai installé la version 11.04, il me semble qu'Ubuntu est beaucoup plus lent. Parfois, il est sur l'économiseur d'écran, je bouge la souris et le disque dur se met à travailler et ca prend plusieurs secondes avant de ravoir le contrôle. Et si Banshee est ouvert, c'est encore pire. Je ne me rappelle pas d'avoir eu ces lenteurs avec les version précédentes d'Ubuntu. Est-ce que vous avez le même comportement? Dany -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
[Ubuntu-QC] Données importantes à récupérer sur un disque NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
Bonjour, Un ami désespérer vient de m'apporter un disque de 500 Go sur lequel il a des données importantes, mais qu'il n'arrive plus à voir ni, forcément, à récupérer. De fait, Windows ne voit même plus ce disque, ce qui n'est pas le cas d'Ubuntu avec lequel cependant, ensuite, ni Gparted ni l'utilitaire de disque ne semblent capables de remettre celui-ci sur ses pattes. Erreur d'entrée/sortie ou Étiquette de disque non reconnue, voilà des messages que je reçois. Impossible à repartitionner non plus... ni à formater (j'ai voulu faire cette opération pour utiliser ensuite un logiciel de récupération de fichiers capable de récupérer des fichiers après un formatage...) Mais comment accéder au disque, qui est vu mais qui ne permet aucune opération? Vola pourquoi j'en appelle à des gens qui s'y connaissent beaucoup plus que moi... Encore une fois, merci à l'avance... François Huot 514-313-3292 -- View this message in context: http://ubuntu-qc.124361.n3.nabble.com/Donnees-importantes-a-recuperer-sur-un-disque-NTFS-qui-a-perdu-la-tete-tp2949557p2949557.html Sent from the Ubuntu-Qc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
[Ubuntu-QC] Récupérer des données sur un DD NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
Bonjour, Un ami désespéré vient de m'apporter un disque de 500 Go sur lequel il a des données importantes, mais qu'il n'arrive plus à voir ni, forcément, à récupérer. De fait, Windows ne voit même plus ce disque, ce qui n'est pas le cas d'Ubuntu avec lequel cependant, ensuite, ni Gparted ni l'utilitaire de disque ne semblent capables de remettre celui-ci sur ses pattes. Erreur d'entrée/sortie ou Étiquette de disque non reconnue, voilà des messages que je reçois. Impossible à repartitionner non plus... ni à formater (j'ai voulu faire cette opération pour utiliser ensuite un logiciel de récupération de fichiers capable de récupérer des fichiers après un formatage...) Mais comment accéder au disque, qui est vu mais qui ne permet aucune opération? Vola pourquoi j'en appelle à des gens qui s'y connaissent beaucoup plus que moi... Encore une fois, merci à l'avance... François Huot 514-313-3292 -- View this message in context: http://ubuntu-qc.124361.n3.nabble.com/Recuperer-des-donnees-sur-un-DD-NTFS-qui-a-perdu-la-tete-tp2949566p2949566.html Sent from the Ubuntu-Qc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Données importantes à récupérer sur un disque NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 12:50 -0700, frhuot wrote: Bonjour, Un ami désespérer vient de m'apporter un disque de 500 Go sur lequel il a des données importantes, mais qu'il n'arrive plus à voir ni, forcément, à récupérer. De fait, Windows ne voit même plus ce disque, ce qui n'est pas le cas d'Ubuntu avec lequel cependant, ensuite, ni Gparted ni l'utilitaire de disque ne semblent capables de remettre celui-ci sur ses pattes. Erreur d'entrée/sortie ou Étiquette de disque non reconnue, voilà des messages que je reçois. Impossible à repartitionner non plus... ni à formater (j'ai voulu faire cette opération pour utiliser ensuite un logiciel de récupération de fichiers capable de récupérer des fichiers après un formatage...) Mais comment accéder au disque, qui est vu mais qui ne permet aucune opération? Vola pourquoi j'en appelle à des gens qui s'y connaissent beaucoup plus que moi... Encore une fois, merci à l'avance... Si c'est des données qui sont importantes, et que l'ami est prêt à payer, je crois que la meilleure solution consiste à l'envoyer à un service de recouvrement, comme par exemple: http://www.ontrackdatarecovery.ca/ Marc. -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Données importantes à récupérer sur un disque NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
Précision: je viens de relancer Ubuntu et le disque dur n'est même plus visible F. Huot 514-313-3292 -- View this message in context: http://ubuntu-qc.124361.n3.nabble.com/Re-Donnees-importantes-a-recuperer-sur-un-disque-NTFS-qui-a-perdu-la-tete-tp2949598p2949839.html Sent from the Ubuntu-Qc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Données importantes à récupérer sur un disque NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
Bonjour François, J'ai eu un prblème semblable récemment. J'ai utilisé TestDisk ( http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk_FR) multiplateforme et libre. Ça fonctionne en ligne de commandes mais tu suis le tutoriel sur le site et ça devrait fonctionner. Perso, ça m'a permis de récupérer un DD de 250 Gigs. Bonne chance! Pierre -- Le manuel disait «Nécessite Windows XP ou mieux»... J'ai donc installé Linux! Au plaisir, Pierre Couillard, consultant techno-pédagogique Technologie, Intégration, Créativité Solutions Informatiques PC Web: http://solinfpc.net Le 16 mai 2011 16:50, frhuot frh...@gmail.com a écrit : Précision: je viens de relancer Ubuntu et le disque dur n'est même plus visible F. Huot 514-313-3292 -- View this message in context: http://ubuntu-qc.124361.n3.nabble.com/Re-Donnees-importantes-a-recuperer-sur-un-disque-NTFS-qui-a-perdu-la-tete-tp2949598p2949839.html Sent from the Ubuntu-Qc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Récupérer des données sur un DD NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
On 11-05-16 03:52 PM, frhuot wrote: Bonjour, Un ami désespéré vient de m'apporter un disque de 500 Go sur lequel il a des données importantes, mais qu'il n'arrive plus à voir ni, forcément, à récupérer. Je suis du même avis que Marc, si les données sont vraiment importantes fait appel à des experts :) Et surtout manipule le disque le moins possible. Normallement si on a accès au disque on fait une copie binaire (dd) et on travaille sur cette image, jamais sur le disque directement. À Montréal plusieurs anciens collègues et amis ont utilisé les services de Kenedacom avec succès, très bon service: http://www.kenedacom.com/ A+ Fabian -- Fabián Rodríguez http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MagicFab ~ Local Community (LoCo) team contact pour Ubuntu Québec http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuebecTeam signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
[Ubuntu-QC] Intel GMA HD et GLX OpenGL
Bonjour, Je viens de recevoir en cadeau un portable MSI MS-1681 et la puce graphique serait une Intel GMA HD selon la fiche technique. Je suis sous Kubuntu 11.04 64 bits et la commande lspci | grep VGA me retourne : 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 12) Le module des pilotes propriétaires ne me donne aucun pilote propriétaire à installer. Je n'ai pas de GLX qui fonctionne. Avec X-Plane version 9.69 j'ai comme message d'erreur : $ X-Plane-i686 Xlib: extension GLX missing on display :0. Whoah -- no matter how hard I tried, I failed to get a GLX visual. Something's seriously wonky on your machine. Mais, j'ai les paquets suivants d'installé : libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx mesa-utils xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-chips xserver-xorg-video-intel libcoin40c2 libcoin60 libopenal0a libopenal1 Est-ce qu'il me manque des paquets à installer ? Le fichier xorg.conf contient : - Section Files EndSection Section Module Loadglx Loaddrm LoadDRI EndSection Section ServerLayout Identifier Layout0 Screen 0 Screen0 0 0 Option Xinerama 0 EndSection Section Monitor Identifier Monitor0 ModelName LPL HorizSync 30.0 - 75.0 VertRefresh 60.0 Option DPMS EndSection Section Device Identifier Device0 Driver intel VendorName intel BoardName Intel HD Option AccelMethod uxa EndSection Section Screen Identifier Screen0 Device Device0 MonitorMonitor0 DefaultDepth24 Option TwinView 0 SubSection Display Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection - Est-ce qu'il y aurait une âme charitable pour nous aider ? L'ami René -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Récupérer des données sur un DD NTFS « qui a perdu la tête »
Je vais transmettre l'avis de Fabian à l'intéressé. Merci. François Huot -- View this message in context: http://ubuntu-qc.124361.n3.nabble.com/Re-Recuperer-des-donnees-sur-un-DD-NTFS-qui-a-perdu-la-tete-tp2949983p2950685.html Sent from the Ubuntu-Qc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
[Ubuntu-QC] Carte réseau sans fil USB
Bonjour, Est-ce que quelqu'un aurait testé une carte réseau Wifi USB fonctionnelle sous Ubuntu? Je dois conseiller un ami à distance sur l'achat d'un tel adapteur et j'aimerais être sur que le modèle que je lui ferai acheter fonctionne en sortant de la boite sans manipulation compliquée de sa part. Je regardait pour un modèle du genre Buffalo WLI-UC-GNM N-TECHNOLOGY Wireless N150 Ultra Compact USB 2.0 Adapter 802.11G/B ou équivalent. Merci beaucoup! René -- Ubuntu-quebec mailing list Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Wacom bamboo tablets...
On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:57:06 +0100 mac ammonius.grammati...@gmx.co.uk wrote: On 15/05/2011 12:58, Timothy Rittman wrote: This topic has come up from time to time on the list, so I'm asking for a quick update! I am thinking of getting a wacom bamboo touch and pen to work with kubuntu 10.10. Does anyone have any experience as to whether it works and how well? You can get the Wacom tablets working. There are resources to help: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Wacom http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=967147 and others. And there are active developers, a leading one of which is Favux (http://ubuntuforums.org/member.php?u=60) I haven't tried to install a Wacom tablet for a while. With the help of the resources I've indicated, I was able to get all the stylus and mouse functionality working up to 10.04 And I was able to get most of the button functions working (I understand this may have progressed by now. But new versions of Ubuntu, and kernel updates, have been known to break things. Wacom tablets seem not to be a priority for the OS developers, not surprisingly I suppose.) I was never able to get the multiple sets of button functions that the Wacom proprietary software provides. But the tablet was highly functional for use with, say, GIMP. So I'd say read the resources above and give it a go. mac -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ Thanks Mac, that's very encouraging. I'll give it a go and report back in a week or two. Regards, Tim -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
[ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
Hi So since I have upgraded to 11.04 on my netbook I have found that Empathy has lost it's scrollbar in the contacts list and is replaced with a fiddly up and down control. The control only appears when you hover over the right edge of the contacts window. This is very tricky when using a touchpad. This has to be a massive design flaw. Anyway to get my scrollbars back? Regards Jon -- Jon Farmer Tel 07795 118140 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 15:26, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: So since I have upgraded to 11.04 on my netbook I have found that Empathy has lost it's scrollbar in the contacts list and is replaced with a fiddly up and down control. The control only appears when you hover over the right edge of the contacts window. This is by design. http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/615 - Ayatana overlay scrollbars: something truly Natty This is very tricky when using a touchpad. It's supposed to be easier, if you don't try to click them but use the scroll region on your touchpad, or if supported enable two finger scrolling. This has to be a massive design flaw. Anyway to get my scrollbars back? sudo apt-get remove overlay-scrollbar liboverlay-scrollbar-0.1-0 Al. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
I get this on most apps with 11.04 - very annoying. I can see the point is that the up and down scroll arrows are now close together for people who use the up and down arrows - but, as I normally just click on the gutter next to where my pointer happens to be, I'm also finding it very, very annoying. Sadly, it persists even when you switch to 'classic GNOME'. Bummer . . . Paula On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:26 +0100, Jon Farmer wrote: Hi So since I have upgraded to 11.04 on my netbook I have found that Empathy has lost it's scrollbar in the contacts list and is replaced with a fiddly up and down control. The control only appears when you hover over the right edge of the contacts window. This is very tricky when using a touchpad. This has to be a massive design flaw. Anyway to get my scrollbars back? Regards Jon -- Jon Farmer Tel 07795 118140 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 15:33, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: It's supposed to be easier, if you don't try to click them but use the scroll region on your touchpad, or if supported enable two finger scrolling. I am not even aware my touchpad has a scroll region. Regards Jon -- Jon Farmer Tel 07795 118140 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 15:44, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: I am not even aware my touchpad has a scroll region. Which netbook is it? Easiest way to try is move your finger forward and back along the right hand edge when in a scrollable window. Cheers, Al. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16/05/11 15:44, Jon Farmer wrote: On 16 May 2011 15:33, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: It's supposed to be easier, if you don't try to click them but use the scroll region on your touchpad, or if supported enable two finger scrolling. I am not even aware my touchpad has a scroll region. Regards Jon Some touch pads do, i think the Packard bell laptops have this paul -- Paul Sutton Cert SLPS (Open) http://www.zleap.net Open Mic nights - Wednesday 8pm to 11pm (14+) Free entry Breakin' Ground - Street dance for young people (8+) Wednesday 6pm (starts May 11th) The Lighthouse,26 Esplanade Road, Paignton 01803 411 812 or e-mail i...@devonmusiccollective.com for more info. 17th September 2011 - Software freedom day -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 15:48, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: On 16 May 2011 15:44, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: Easiest way to try is move your finger forward and back along the right hand edge when in a scrollable window. So apparently I do. Still a major PITA to use with Empathy though. A total loss of fine control. Regards Jon -- Jon Farmer Tel 07795 118140 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 16:27, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: On 16 May 2011 15:48, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: On 16 May 2011 15:44, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: Easiest way to try is move your finger forward and back along the right hand edge when in a scrollable window. So apparently I do. Still a major PITA to use with Empathy though. A total loss of fine control. Regards Jon I'd argue the point on the loss of fine control, you can still drag those little arrows up and down to get to where you want in a document, rather than just clicking on them to go up/down. The only thing that's a bit more difficult is clicking to go direct to a point (feels like the gutter has a smaller margin, but that may be wrong). But then again, different people use things in different ways. -Matt Daubney -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 16:45, Matthew Daubney m...@daubers.co.uk wrote: I'd argue the point on the loss of fine control, you can still drag those little arrows up and down to get to where you want in a document, rather than just clicking on them to go up/down. The only thing that's a bit more difficult is clicking to go direct to a point (feels like the gutter has a smaller margin, but that may be wrong). I'd argue that is a lot harder to do with a touchpad than a mouse. Regards Jon -- Jon Farmer Tel 07795 118140 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Daubney wrote: On 16 May 2011 16:27, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: On 16 May 2011 15:48, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: On 16 May 2011 15:44, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: Easiest way to try is move your finger forward and back along the right hand edge when in a scrollable window. So apparently I do. Still a major PITA to use with Empathy though. A total loss of fine control. Regards Jon I'd argue the point on the loss of fine control, you can still drag those little arrows up and down to get to where you want in a document, rather than just clicking on them to go up/down. The only thing that's a bit more difficult is clicking to go direct to a point (feels like the gutter has a smaller margin, but that may be wrong). But then again, different people use things in different ways. -Matt Daubney Touchpad scrolling is a blunt instrument - for which reason I rarely use it. I have two-finger scrolling on the wifi KB I use for media which is much better, but don't have it on my laptop. I almost never use the little arrows, I used to click on the gutter to advance page by page - thank God Firefox still has the gutter! Also agree, people use these things in different ways and I can see you'd like it if you mainly use the arrows - although I find the arrows are less accurate than before. Choice is a wonderful thing but I don't see any way of exercising it re. the vertical scrollbar in 11.04. I've ditched Unity interface, can't cope with it - for something that's supposed to be easy to use, I actually found I reverted almost entirely to keyboard shortcuts as the Unity GUI is hopeless for navigating a desktop with multiple windows. Also had to switch off the infuriating habit of full-screening windows if you drag them to the side. If I drag a window to the side, it's cos I want to see what's underneath! Paula -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 16:49, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: On 16 May 2011 16:45, Matthew Daubney m...@daubers.co.uk wrote: I'd argue the point on the loss of fine control, you can still drag those little arrows up and down to get to where you want in a document, rather than just clicking on them to go up/down. The only thing that's a bit more difficult is clicking to go direct to a point (feels like the gutter has a smaller margin, but that may be wrong). I'd argue that is a lot harder to do with a touchpad than a mouse. I think this is one of those things. 90% of my time I work with a touchpad and haven't noticed a difference. However, I am not you :) I have noticed my parents really struggle with a touchpad (to the point of using a mouse on the arm of the sofa) so I'm happy to concede the point that to a given subset of users, it may not be optimal. However, I have no idea what the size of that subset is, or what the size of the userbase is. So can't really say it's a good thing for the majority or It's a bad things for the majority. -Matt Daubney -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 16:56, gazz pmg...@gmx.co.uk wrote: Touchpad scrolling is a blunt instrument - for which reason I rarely use it. Depends on the hardware. On my laptop it's fantastic. Very fine control indeed can be had with two finger scrolling. Much finer than a mouse wheel which (in general) goes in jumps of a few lines at a time. Choice is a wonderful thing but I don't see any way of exercising it re. the vertical scrollbar in 11.04. I've ditched Unity interface, can't cope with it - for something that's supposed to be easy to use, I actually found I reverted almost entirely to keyboard shortcuts as the Unity GUI is hopeless for navigating a desktop with multiple windows. Also had to switch off the infuriating habit of full-screening windows if you drag them to the side. If I drag a window to the side, it's cos I want to see what's underneath! Why move a window to see what's underneath? Why not just switch to the window you actually want to see? Al. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011, at 17:47, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: Depends on the hardware. On my laptop it's fantastic. Very fine control indeed can be had with two finger scrolling. Much finer than a mouse wheel which (in general) goes in jumps of a few lines at a time. I'm almost certain that that is something that can be tailored so that you don't scroll several lines at a time with the mouse scroll wheel, and instead can have smooth scrolling. Thanks and Regards, Liam Gallear -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 15:26, Jon Farmer j...@bctech.co.uk wrote: Anyway to get my scrollbars back? Yes. Remove (or purge, depending on preference ;) overlay-scrollbar, e.g. $ sudo apt-get remove overlay-scrollbar Log out and in, all should be chunky. Jonathon -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16/05/11 17:47, Alan Pope wrote: On 16 May 2011 16:56, gazzpmg...@gmx.co.uk wrote: Touchpad scrolling is a blunt instrument - for which reason I rarely use it. Depends on the hardware. On my laptop it's fantastic. Very fine control indeed can be had with two finger scrolling. Much finer than a mouse wheel which (in general) goes in jumps of a few lines at a time. Choice is a wonderful thing but I don't see any way of exercising it re. the vertical scrollbar in 11.04. I've ditched Unity interface, can't cope with it - for something that's supposed to be easy to use, I actually found I reverted almost entirely to keyboard shortcuts as the Unity GUI is hopeless for navigating a desktop with multiple windows. Also had to switch off the infuriating habit of full-screening windows if you drag them to the side. If I drag a window to the side, it's cos I want to see what's underneath! Why move a window to see what's underneath? Why not just switch to the window you actually want to see? Al. Sometimes if you're referring to something it might be easier to have the window slightly underneath to the side maybe. I do this on Windows at work, even with dual monitors (old habits die hard). Is it possible to tile windows in Unity? (I've not upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04, instead I moved over to Mint 10 about 5 months ago). Rob -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 17:47 +0100, Alan Pope wrote: Why move a window to see what's underneath? Why not just switch to the window you actually want to see? Al. Cuz I wanna see both of them - like click on a colour picker and still be able to see what I'm trying to pick! Paula -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 17:47, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: Why move a window to see what's underneath? Why not just switch to the window you actually want to see? If I have the downloads window of firefox open, but behind another firefox window, what is the most efficient way to get to see it (using Unity rather than Tools, Downloads in FF)? Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16/05/11 18:23, Colin Law wrote: On 16 May 2011 17:47, Alan Popea...@popey.com wrote: Why move a window to see what's underneath? Why not just switch to the window you actually want to see? If I have the downloads window of firefox open, but behind another firefox window, what is the most efficient way to get to see it (using Unity rather than Tools, Downloads in FF)? Colin You could try the shortcut, Control, Shift and Y. Rob -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] wifi dongle driver .....
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 +0100, Neil Greenwood wrote: Of course, you realise that you have now modified and compiled a portion of the Linux kernel? :-) You fixed an incompatible API (Application Programming Interface) change. Wow - I did that? Amazing. Couldn't have managed it without help from you guys though. I've carefully documented the procedure and e-mailed it to the supplier with a request that they pass on the information to future purchasers of the dongle. Thanks again, Barry. -- Barry Drake is a member of the the Ubuntu Advertising team. http://ubuntuadverts.org/ -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On May 16, 2011 6:23 PM, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com If I have the downloads window of firefox open, but behind another firefox window, what is the most efficient way to get to see it (using Unity rather than Tools, Downloads in FF)? Install a download bar extension? The separate window always annoyed me... On Chrome now anyway. Josh -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 18:39, Rob Beard r...@esdelle.co.uk wrote: On 16/05/11 18:23, Colin Law wrote: On 16 May 2011 17:47, Alan Popea...@popey.com wrote: Why move a window to see what's underneath? Why not just switch to the window you actually want to see? If I have the downloads window of firefox open, but behind another firefox window, what is the most efficient way to get to see it (using Unity rather than Tools, Downloads in FF)? Colin You could try the shortcut, Control, Shift and Y. This is a Unity question, not FF. I am enquiring as to the best way to switch between windows within one app using Unity. This was with respect to Alan's point that one could just select the other window rather than sliding the front one aside. With the classic interface one could do this via the bottom panel (one click). With Unity, to switch between open apps one can click the button on the launcher but I have not found a quick way to switch between multiple windows open for one app. Generally I like Unity, though it is essential I think to learn the hot keys, but the multiple-windows-for-one-app problem is one that I am having trouble with. Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 21:44, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: This is a Unity question, not FF. I am enquiring as to the best way to switch between windows within one app using Unity. This was with respect to Alan's point that one could just select the other window rather than sliding the front one aside. With the classic interface one could do this via the bottom panel (one click). With Unity, to switch between open apps one can click the button on the launcher but I have not found a quick way to switch between multiple windows open for one app. Generally I like Unity, though it is essential I think to learn the hot keys, but the multiple-windows-for-one-app problem is one that I am having trouble with. Colin When on the same workspace as the application, left click on the application icon in the Unity launcher will display thumbnails of all open windows Cycle through all application windows on a workspace by middle mouse click on the top panel - in the gap between the menu and the indicators Thank you -- John Stevenson http://uk.linkedin.com/in/johnstevenson247 | @JR0ckethttp://http//twitter.com/#%21/JR0cket | JR0cket.co.uk http://jr0cket.co.uk/ | JR0cket.com http://jr0cket.com/ | LeanAgileMachine.com http://leanagilemachine.com/ -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 21:53, John Stevenson j...@jr0cket.com wrote: On 16 May 2011 21:44, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: This is a Unity question, not FF. I am enquiring as to the best way to switch between windows within one app using Unity. This was with respect to Alan's point that one could just select the other window rather than sliding the front one aside. With the classic interface one could do this via the bottom panel (one click). With Unity, to switch between open apps one can click the button on the launcher but I have not found a quick way to switch between multiple windows open for one app. Generally I like Unity, though it is essential I think to learn the hot keys, but the multiple-windows-for-one-app problem is one that I am having trouble with. Colin When on the same workspace as the application, left click on the application icon in the Unity launcher will display thumbnails of all open windows Are you sure, using Unity 2D it is double click that does this. Cycle through all application windows on a workspace by middle mouse click on the top panel - in the gap between the menu and the indicators That is useful, unfortunately not yet implemented in Unity 2d, but no doubt it will come. Again, though, neither is anything like as convenient as clicking the app in the bottom panel. Perhaps I just have to put up with this. Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] Empathy and 11.04
On 16 May 2011 21:51, Andy Braben andybra...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 May 2011 21:44, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: This is a Unity question, not FF. I am enquiring as to the best way to switch between windows within one app using Unity. This was with respect to Alan's point that one could just select the other window rather than sliding the front one aside. With the classic interface one could do this via the bottom panel (one click). With Unity, to switch between open apps one can click the button on the launcher but I have not found a quick way to switch between multiple windows open for one app. Generally I like Unity, though it is essential I think to learn the hot keys, but the multiple-windows-for-one-app problem is one that I am having trouble with. I generally use Alt+Tab. These days having a graphical view of the open windows on the dialog, it makes it very easy to know when to let go for the window that you want. That does work certainly, but holding Alt down and hitting tab maybe six or seven times (or even three or four) is a bit tedious compared to the single click using the bottom panel. Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Trouble with Pidgin-skype plugin in Natty
Hi, all! I recently upgraded to Natty and installed Skype, Pidgin, and the subject plugin, all from the official repositories. I am able to make Skype calls and, sometimes, be heard. When my recipient picks up, I also get a dialogue asking me to accept or reject, as if the call were in-coming. When someone tries calling me, I get the ring and in-coming call dialogue. When I choose accept, the call does not get answered. In an exchange of Skype text messages, I can see my messages in the conversation window, but not those from the other party. Is there something I haven't set up right? This arrangement works in all Ubuntu versions up to and including Maverick. I cannot access Skype without this protocol plugin, since Orca screen reader does not work with QT4 objects. Thanks for any help, Dave Hunt -- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
Re: UI change question
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33:58AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: how challenging would it be to take the current ubuntustudio-desktop metapackge and rename it to ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and just leave it in place as long as gnome2 is around. I haven't looked into the package depends in a long while, but I don't see why this would be a problem as long as those depends actually provide what we're expecting. My guess though is that they will change, so then it would defeat the purpose. But it's worth looking into, I presume. -- Jaska signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: UI change question
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Janne Jokitalo astralj...@kapsi.fiwrote: On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33:58AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: how challenging would it be to take the current ubuntustudio-desktop metapackge and rename it to ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and just leave it in place as long as gnome2 is around. I haven't looked into the package depends in a long while, but I don't see why this would be a problem as long as those depends actually provide what we're expecting. My guess though is that they will change, so then it would defeat the purpose. But it's worth looking into, I presume. COOL... yeah, im hoping that the changes would just kinda 'settle' since gnome2 should just be sitting there now, and not being changed, and the applications themselves shouldnt care if they are on gnome2 or 3 or unity or whatever. its gotta be simple and maintenance free, or something easy enough for someone like me to maintain ( /me not a coder)... -- Jaska -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3ROWQACgkQxgcH0NnJT+Dr1QCcD7TZUra5llfNwqEX98p9WSBN cIEAn1+NBkZoXemqyT5baUPkAKpGELVn =iceB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- MH http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ http://wnclug.ourproject.org/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: PulseAudio and Ubuntu Studio 11.10
On 2011-05-17 06:24, Scott Lavender wrote: On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:27 PM, David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com mailto:david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote: Sources and sinks, yes. Well, they should show up in both PulseAudio and JACK - since it is a connection between JACK and PulseAudio you should be able to route it the way you want in both PulseAudio and JACK. If you have both Natty and the DBus version of Jack2, it should show up automatically. If you use Lucid, Maverick, or Natty with another version of Jack, you'll need one or both of terminal command(s): pacmd load-module module-jack-sink pacmd load-module module-jack-source ...depending on whether you want to link playback, recording, or both. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic http://launchpad.net/%7Ediwic David, Okay, did some testing tonight but had some trouble. Since qjackctl has the wrapper script to suspend Pulse Audio I shied away from it, Hmm, is that script still present? AFAIK it was removed in Maverick, when PA and Jack implemented the device reservation protocol. although I realize that I could have called the binary directly and skipped the script. However, I did it from the command line. If I just run qjackctl from a terminal here, it does not suspend PulseAudio. Firstly, I checked the jack version [1], which appears to be correct as it is jack2 and in Natty. For the automatic stuff you want to make sure that Setup - Misc - Enable D-Bus interface is checked as well. My first test was to start playing an .ogg file with Totem and then try to start jack from the command line. The result was that jack found the hardware locked...Ptui! Ubuntu pastebin isn't working, sorry for the wall of text: scott@natty-studio:~$ jackd -dalsa -dhw:1 -r44100 -p512 -n3 ...and start jackdbus instead of jackd here. jackdmp 1.9.7 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. Copyright 2004-2010 Grame. jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details no message buffer overruns no message buffer overruns JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10 control device hw:1 control device hw:1 audio_reservation_init Acquire audio card Audio1 creating alsa driver ... hw:1|hw:1|512|3|44100|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit control device hw:1 Using ALSA driver HDA-Intel running on card 1 - HDA Intel at 0xfe9fc000 irq 45 the playback device hw:1 is already in use. Please stop the application using it and run JACK again Cannot initialize driver JackServer::Open() failed with -1 Failed to start server Hmm, under this scenario, could you supply the output of sudo fuser -v /dev/snd/*? It sounds like totem does not use pulseaudio but goes to the sound card through some other path. Now, I reversed the process and start jack from the command line and then try to start Totem with the .ogg file: scott@natty-studio:~$ jackd -dalsa -dhw:1 -r44100 -p512 -n3 jackdmp 1.9.7 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. Copyright 2004-2010 Grame. jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details no message buffer overruns no message buffer overruns JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10 control device hw:1 control device hw:1 audio_reservation_init Acquire audio card Audio1 creating alsa driver ... hw:1|hw:1|512|3|44100|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit control device hw:1 Using ALSA driver HDA-Intel running on card 1 - HDA Intel at 0xfe9fc000 irq 45 configuring for 44100Hz, period = 512 frames (11.6 ms), buffer = 3 periods ALSA: final selected sample format for capture: 32bit integer little-endian ALSA: use 3 periods for capture ALSA: final selected sample format for playback: 16bit little-endian ALSA: use 3 periods for playback ^Cjack main caught signal 2 control device hw:1 Released audio card Audio1 audio_reservation_finish control device hw:1 This started jack well but Totem refused to play the song. When I ctl-c to stop jack then Totem started up directly and began to play the song. At this point I didn't try either 'pacmd' lines until I hear back from you as it seems you expected this to work. I realize, however, that there is a real chance that I'm doing something wrong too :) Could you also check 1) the Connect window in qjackctl and see if there are PulseAudio sources and sinks there? 2) in the pavucontrol application, check that Totem is set to output to the Jack sink? Maybe they just need to be connected manually? -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Suggestions for Ubuntu 11.10
On 16 May 2011 10:27, Omal Mannapperuma omal.lasi...@gmail.com wrote: 1) Ability to search within a folder, just by right clicking on the folder, and select search for files and folders Why not open the folder and click search? That seems both more intuitive and less complicated than having to right-click the folder to get a menu from which you can choose to search. 2) Make K3B as the default CD/DVD burning application, and if possible, add Blu-Ray burning as well into it. Still the application lacks with the feature to burn bootable CD/DVDs of any kind, so I would be most delighted to see that being integrated into it as well. ' Why is K3B more user friendly than the one we currently have installed by default, Brasero? 3) Make available a single location to enter Proxy settings, and let that be spread throughout the system, without any interaction from the user any further. What kind of proxies are you talking about here? Do you think it should be a requirement that system updates are installed from the same proxy server that you use when you IRC? 4) Assign a drive letter to the partitions detected by Ubuntu, rather than 120GB partition or anything like that. That's fairly cute. Tell me; why is F:\ more user friendly than /media/holliday_pictures? By the way; Ubuntu can never use colon that way, so it would have to be something like /F;/. Have a look at the web and could the number of drive letters you can find. They're the same kind of addresses, if you weren't aware of it. I don't understand why it's more user friendly to have different filepaths on the web and on your computer. 5) Add Samba by default to the distribution. You can right click a file and choose to share it using Samba. Isn't that good enough? Why? 6) Add support for Acer Veriton series as well. Isn't it supported? Why? File bugs. The reason is, most computer users are much familiar with Windows, and in Windows, they see a much clearer view of their data than in Linux. Because of drive letters, it is easier to remember where the data are located. Seriously? Microsoft implemented the support to mount partitions in directories years ago, in Windows XP, I believe. One of the reasons why that's more user friendly, is that you can split a file hierarchy into different disks and partitions. For instance, say you travel a lot and you take lots of pictures and videos from your trips. Sometimes, you use a memory card, othertimes a usb stick, while still at other times, you use an external harddrive. Wouldn't it be nice if they all appeared in /media/travel/ so that when you inserted your memory card from your trip to Hungary in May this year, it would appear as /media/travel/hungary-may-2011? In Windows, by default, the location would depend on other hardware. If you had inserted a memory card from your kids soccermatch, then instead of F:\, your mmc from your trip to Hungary would receive G:\, or possibly H:\ if you had also connected your phone. Please explain how that is more user friendly? People are reluctant to use Ubuntu or any other Linux, because they have to learn the shell and al Where did you get that impression? I take it you're talking about entering commands in order to get things done? If a normal user /needs/ do to that, then that is a bug. Can you give some examples? I feel quite confident this is based on rumors and misconceptions, but if you prove me wrong, then I'm sure lots of people will be happy to help fix that problem. Having tested Ubuntu on new and experienced users for years, I have to say it's been a number of years since last I experienced such an issue. I think it's time that things should change. The more user friendly Ubuntu can get close to Windows while retaining the stability, you guys will be stunned how many will download this magnificient OS on the launching day itself, if you put a counter for how many downloads during the launching day of a new distribution. I agree it's time that things should change, but I do not share your vision of the future. For instance, I don't think a user should have to remember where files are located or what names they have. The brain doesn't work that way. It's much easier to remember that your girlfriend sent you a picture last friday at lunch, than it is to remember C:\Users and Settings\jo-erlend\Documents\Shared with me\Pictures\Irene\dyts20110520113540.jpeg. Don't you think? And what if downloads from different applications have different download folders? I would much rather focus on my girlfriend than protocols and drive letters. Or lets say you take the train to and from work every day. Since you have a laptop and the train has an internet connection, you spend your time traveling to and from work as productively as you can. Your computer has a GPS installed. So after going to work one morning, you simply tag that travel as office. From now on, you can just type to office and you get a complete overview of everything you've done
Re: systemd for 11.10 ?
Excerpts from Phillip Susi's message of Sun May 08 15:11:57 -0700 2011: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/06/2011 07:03 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, Am Samstag, den 30.04.2011, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Thomas Bechtold: Hi, i just want to know if there are any plans to replace upstart[1] with systemd[2] for 11.10? I have to say I was skeptical at first, but after reading that very good introduction it sounds great! http://undacuvabrutha.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/why-ubuntu-should-continue-with-upstart-for-11-10/ Seriously? It is too close to LTS? It's over 11 months away! I don't mean to jump on the unity haters bandwagon, but that was pressed in one dev cycle and was still in pretty bad shape just 2 months before release. Surly if we can manage that, we can manage systemd in 11 months? Or at least make an attempt; you can always switch back if it is still looking bad at beta time. Hi Phillip, I appreciate that it seems like a change similar to the switch of default desktop environment, however, there's a massive difference. Changing the UI meant a great deal of progress toward the project's stated goals. Changing the pid 1 just means adding efficiency to something that already works, and is starting to be well understood. Its Diesel versus Gasoline. Each has their merits, but the overlap is 80% and the 20% difference is, IMO, mostly corner cases and optimizations. Change has a cost, and no matter how much of that cost we pay up front in man power, we simply cannot get it done in time without taking on technical debt, because some of the debt is the unknown bugs and corner cases that a change brings. Since LTS also means incurring a greater maintenance cost due to its extended life cycle, this ultimately means LTS multiplies some of the technical debt. So, we should strive for extremely low technical debt the closer we get to an LTS, so that we're not paying it back as we fix bugs for the lifecycle of the project. 9.10 added some of that debt by putting in place upstart before it was widely understood, and before it had been sufficiently utilized to implement complex dependencies (see bug #525154 for an example). That debt has since been paid in user frustration and painful debugging. The investment, however, paid off in faster boot times, so the trade off wasn't all bad. We're getting close to paying most of that off now. To consider taking on even more would have been a bid mad IMO. The things it adds *are* interesting. However, IMO they are all optimizations and features to help with corner cases we've already covered, or things that make the parallelized, different style boot easier to swallow. Our users have already swallowed event based boot, as bitter a pill as it was for some of them. Lets thank them by providing them a smoother, more refined boot experience for 11.10 and 12.04, then consider systemd once we're ready for some hard core refactoring in 12.10. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Release note translations?
Hi!
I created bug-report because nobody can/want help us with our translations:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/783764
Link
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes?os=ubuntuver=11.04lang={LANG}
always redirect to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NattyNarwhal/ReleaseNotes
2011/5/15 Dennis Baudys thecon...@arcor.de
Hi Translators and Coordinator(s)!
The German translation of the Natty release notes is complete and can be
found here [1]. I just wanted to inform you about this – maybe some
manual magic has to be done to include these (maybe in the updated
installer files). Otherwise I assume they will be displayed
automatically (hopefully) somehow.
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NattyNarwhal/ReleaseNotes/de
--
ubuntu-translators mailing list
ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 15:46 -0400, Michael Dickson wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 13:17 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: check out gnome3 here http://www.gnome3.org/tryit.html and see what you think. assuming gnome3 is an acceptable DE for ubuntustudio, it cannot be disputed that it is a drastic change from gnome2, and its arguable that XFCE is actually more like gnome2 than gnome3 is. i have been hanging out in the #gnome channel on freenode looking into what 'compatibility mode' is in gnome3, and how to get it running, and if it is indeed the same as gnome3, and if it is going to be part of gnome3 in the long term. to quote from the IRC channel 'gnome2 is dead'. that being said, feel free to actually go and check out gnome3 for yourself, and report on its functionality. thanks I have actually run Gnome3. And like others I struggled with it a bit initially. But after using it for a little while I found it very nice. It is a big change however, no disputing that. I'll weigh in with this opinion. I believe Ubuntu Studio should track the default Ubuntu desktop for the release track its on. In the time frame being discussed that would actually mean Unity as I understand it. Unity has its own issues and represents a big change. But it will be the default for the platform and therefore likely have the largest user base for the DE environments supported. And that user based insures testing and stability for US. Now if someone isn't comfortable with that approach an alternative that should be available is installing the Ubuntu flavor you prefer (like XUbuntu for instance) and retrofitting packages from Studio on top of it. So no reason I cant run studio bits under XFCE. But the default should be the default for the distribution. That's my take and the argument for it. Mike The averaged Ubuntu user isn't a home recording or professional studio user. A long time ago I used KDE3 (on Suse and Debian). When they stopped KDE3 and switched to KDE4, I switched to GNOME. KDE4 has a lot of advantages, but the workflow changed and it became less good for the way I'm using the desktop environment, especially when making music. If it's similar for the change from GNOME2 to GNOME3, it would be nice to get an already set up substitution. Installing Ubuntu Studio from the Ubuntu Studio media caused issues here, installing Edubunt + Ubuntu Studio packages result in a good DAW. So for me the only problem might be, that installing the Ubuntu Studio packages might force me to keep XFCE too, even if I shouldn't use it, but yes, it's no big deal to have several WMs/DEs installed and to chose one, when logging in. XFCE shouldn't become a dependency for all Ubuntu Studio meta packages. Regarding to computer resources, the best environment I ever used, was a frame based environment. Ion2. But short-cuts aren't good when you've got one hand on the guitar, the other on the mixing console and you need to start the recording with your nose. Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 19:41 +0200, Robert Klaar wrote: If there is one thing I've learned in these years using linux is to go with the mainstream and use what people use most, not doing so might land you in a position where something as basic, for a musician, as getting your soundcard to work seem hopeless due to lack of support. Full ACK, but making music using Linux is done ... I think US would be wise to stay as close as possible to it, and even though switching DE's is not really that drastic, changing something like this might make it a lot more harder for an artist or a producer etc., with little computer experience, solving problems as the solution found in the forums might not be enough. Now, this is not a problem for most people who use linux since you get used to these things after a while switching distro's aso. and in general you get better at it but not everyone does this, especially not your typical artist type, that's why many musicians prefer mac's. ... by a marginal group. PRO FOOLS and other stuff is used because humans are gregarious animals. The trendies wish to be cooler, than ordinary Microsoft users. An Apple computer is a status symbol and often not the best choice for a recording studio. We can't stay close !!! to the averaged desktop user community, if we need real real-time. It begins with default settings for the DE, e.g. sound for the desktop. When I'm using the computer for office work etc. I don't need audio, but the averaged user wish to have audio. If I use it to make music, I won't here any voice from the trash can that is double as loud as my recordings are. Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
Am Sun, 15 May 2011 15:46:50 -0400 schrieb Michael Dickson mike.dick...@rivendellnh.com: I believe Ubuntu Studio should track the default Ubuntu desktop for the release track its on. I have thoughts in the same direction, but regarding change from default, I got a perhaps more narrow view, even. A user I support has a normal laptop with ubuntu (10.10) and a separate machine with Studio. I actually installed from the US medium and thus got the different UI configuration, compared to stock ubuntu: Different optics and different menus (like, the missing Applications and System direct-access menus in the panel). That wouldn't fly at all. So I configured the US install to look just like a default desktop (which took some time since you have to search through forum posts to find anything). The user doesn't want disruption of the known workflow. Not again, after getting accustomed to Linux / ubuntu at all. So, the current / last ubuntu Studio deviations from the normal Gnome 2 install were too much already. I see the question of switching the desktop you get when installing Studio directly as not that relevant to me: I'll install people the vanilla ubuntu and then add Studio packages on top, keeping the known interface. And to be honest, that's the two faces of ubuntu Studio I see: 1. Exactly the same desktop as vanilla, just with added functionality (realtime settings, etc.). 2. Something different. The second category includes the old setup with a changed Gnome 2 configuration, as well as a possible XFCE setup in the future: It's different from vanilla. That's enough for my users not to use it. It doesn't matter for normal users how different it is. Perhaps more different is better to quickly realize that one has to adapt expectations. Pro people who are more dedicated to studio work, who wire up lots of JACK clients and have many desktops filled with those synth / sampler controls, can benefit from a specialized ubuntu Studio desktop. People who just want to record a bit with some provided Ardour templates will use the environment they have on other installs -- otherwise they get confused and annoyed. Just go ahead and change ubuntu Studio desktop to what you think is best -- as long as one can just upgrade a vanilla install with the audio recording packages. Alrighty then, Thomas. PS: Of course it's a separate question how those users will survive the switch to unity ... well, for 11.04, it will be classic desktop for sure! signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 17:12 +0200, Ralf wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:24 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: Ralph, im going to assume a question here. that question would be... will the ubuntustudio metapackages *require* XFCE? theres one metapackage right now called ubuntustudio-desktop. that would be the one that would pull XFCE in, and switch DE's. theres no reason why the others should do that, or need to do that, and thats a very valid point that i will keep in mind as we move forward. this question you posed also gave me a great idea. maybe we can just take the current ubuntustudio-desktop (with gnome2), leave it as-is (so there is no maintenance) rename it ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and leave that in place as long as gnome2 is around. in that way, a user could install the current ubuntu vanilla, and get switched to the good 'ol gnome current setup that we all know and love by running sudo apt-get install ubuntustudio-destkop-gnome. this package could be around as long as ubuntu has gnome2 in the repo. i will ask how challenging that could be to implement that, unless you would like to take that on Ralph? it would be great if you could help us constructively resolve some of these issues users are having with this UI switch. A good idea to provide 2 different desktop meta packages, if somebody has the time and knowledge to maintain the GNOME package. I might have some time to contribute some work, but I guess not the knowledge to help here. Resp. how could I (and perhaps other people) contribute something regarding to the DE issue? Ralf PS: Pardon? No maintenance? What's the difference between a Ubuntu vanilla GNOME and the GNOME by the Ubuntu Studio package? -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On , Ralf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 17:12 +0200, Ralf wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:24 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: Ralph, im going to assume a question here. that question would be... will the ubuntustudio metapackages *require* XFCE? theres one metapackage right now called ubuntustudio-desktop. that would be the one that would pull XFCE in, and switch DE's. theres no reason why the others should do that, or need to do that, and thats a very valid point that i will keep in mind as we move forward. this question you posed also gave me a great idea. maybe we can just take the current ubuntustudio-desktop (with gnome2), leave it as-is (so there is no maintenance) rename it ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and leave that in place as long as gnome2 is around. in that way, a user could install the current ubuntu vanilla, and get switched to the good 'ol gnome current setup that we all know and love by running sudo apt-get install ubuntustudio-destkop-gnome. this package could be around as long as ubuntu has gnome2 in the repo. i will ask how challenging that could be to implement that, unless you would like to take that on Ralph? it would be great if you could help us constructively resolve some of these issues users are having with this UI switch. A good idea to provide 2 different desktop meta packages, if somebody has the time and knowledge to maintain the GNOME package. I might have some time to contribute some work, but I guess not the knowledge to help here. Resp. how could I (and perhaps other people) contribute something regarding to the DE issue? Ralf PS: Pardon? No maintenance? What's the difference between a Ubuntu vanilla GNOME and the GNOME by the Ubuntu Studio package? -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users Hi Ralf! This may be one of those huge misconceptions that the Ubuntu Studio team is vast and robust. Alas, neither presumptions are correct sadly. The Ubuntu Studio team does not maintain any GNOME packages. We maintain a ubuntustudio- package that uses gconf settings to change GNOME settings. I hope this helps. Cheers, ScottL -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Ubuntu-Studio-users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 28
I think another viable alternative is the gnome metatracker project http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/ 'tracker' is in the repositories as well as Tracker Search Tool. I believe I had to edit a config file somewhere to get total Nautilus integration, search on Ubuntu Forums, there's lots about it there. I've been using it to tag stuff from the command line -- Todd Howe - Sapere Aude Signaltonoisemedia - Writing - Design - Photography - Video Find me on Skype at tehowe or Windows Live at teh...@hotmail.com (IM only, NO emails pls) Assert your right to communications privacy: Encrypt! Windows: http://www.gpg4win.org/about.html Linux/Mac: http://gnupg.org/related_software/frontends.en.html On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:19 +, ubuntu-studio-users-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com wrote: Message: 1 Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 08:32:31 -0500 From: Erik Rasmussen mailfore...@gmail.com To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: SFX library - Search Message-ID: BANLkTi=dhqazb7dfxoyw3hq83waqq57...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hopefully someone has a better solution than this, but I wonder if the Google Desktop Search for Linux would search that metadata on your hard drive for you? http://desktop.google.com/linux/ Not familiar with Sound Miner, but once in a while I'll use www.FindSounds.com * * On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 05:16, jONE producjo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I've got a big SFX library which grows every day. The main trouble is that just searching for files in Nautilus only brings them up by name. Does anyone know of a searching method that can include metadata, xml and not just file names? Or even better an open source alternative to Sound Miner? I could use Pro Tools for this, but most of my sound design is done on my linux box! John -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20110516/dcd60387/attachment-0001.html -- -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
I don't know if this helps but I first tried xfce at Mint 5. To be honest, the only difference I really noticed was that it was faster than gnome. Otherwise - apart from the xfce logo, there seemed little or no discernable difference. I had an old machine back then and so my only thought is that if xfce is faster on an old machine, how much faster on a new one? I say try it. Whats to lose? If the community try and like, it stays, if they try and don't like then the developers have a choice. Look at main stream ubuntu with this ghastly unity desktop. I will put money that ubuntu 11.10 reverts to gnome. This idea of xfce as the DE for studio works for me because Ive used xfce before. So based on experience this is a welcome change for me. People generally do not like change but sometimes, just as in biological evolution, Linux must adapt to ever changing market environments in order to keep up and survive. Xfce could be a great idea but unless one tries it and has first hand experience, I struggle to see any comment as constructive. There are xfce editions of various distros out there, it costs one disc to run an OS (without installing) and to see first hand how good xfce is. Remembering of course that it wont be as fast from the disk. Try it, then post? Anthony Hall. On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: I apologize for singling out this post, but... On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:37 AM, aYo Binitie ayobini...@gmail.com wrote: XFCE - I have no idea about but it was super we would not be all having these rants. aYo -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users I think this is a very, very poor argument. But iyou are not alone however. I haven't read any rants in this thread (well, maybe one) but I have seen a lot of ignorant whinging. There has been a vocal minority that asked, Why change from GNOME 2? or some other variant of that statement. But it appears that these people neither understand why we made a decision nor have any understanding of XFCE and how similar it is to GNOME 2. So, the rants are ignorant protestations about change. This has no reflection on XFCE. I challenge you (not just you aYo, but everyone) who thinks XFCE isn't super or good or isn't GNOME 2 to actually try it. Try it for a week. A day, even. If someone can use XFCE and then provide a good fact based argument for not using XFCE *OR* can provide a viable alternative we would very much like to hear them. I mean that sincerely. What I don't like, appreciate, or find useful is ignorant whinging without providing any reasons, facts, or alternatives. ScottL -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
Hi Scott, Your opinions are noted and they are valid. I never claimed that XFCE was no good - just that I had never used it and there were probably good reasons why it was second best to Gnome2. Having said that considering the fact that going forward there is a need for a new desktop to be adopted - I acquiese to the fact that you - the UbuntuStudio team have done your due-diligence and have found this the sensible and viable option. I will take you up on your suggestion and try Xubuntu to see for myself the possibilities therein. I have converted the entire Flash development (and IT ) team in my Agency to the Ubuntuside thus my interest in this is tremendous. aYo On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: I apologize for singling out this post, but... On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:37 AM, aYo Binitie ayobini...@gmail.com wrote: XFCE - I have no idea about but it was super we would not be all having these rants. aYo -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users I think this is a very, very poor argument. But iyou are not alone however. I haven't read any rants in this thread (well, maybe one) but I have seen a lot of ignorant whinging. There has been a vocal minority that asked, Why change from GNOME 2? or some other variant of that statement. But it appears that these people neither understand why we made a decision nor have any understanding of XFCE and how similar it is to GNOME 2. So, the rants are ignorant protestations about change. This has no reflection on XFCE. I challenge you (not just you aYo, but everyone) who thinks XFCE isn't super or good or isn't GNOME 2 to actually try it. Try it for a week. A day, even. If someone can use XFCE and then provide a good fact based argument for not using XFCE *OR* can provide a viable alternative we would very much like to hear them. I mean that sincerely. What I don't like, appreciate, or find useful is ignorant whinging without providing any reasons, facts, or alternatives. ScottL -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
For those who hd wanted to try compatibility mode in Gnome3. It's in: System Settings-System Info-Graphics When its enabled you have what should be a pretty standard Gnome experience minus some of the tweakable options. Mike -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ralf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: A good idea to provide 2 different desktop meta packages, if somebody has the time and knowledge to maintain the GNOME package. I might have some time to contribute some work, but I guess not the knowledge to help here. Resp. how could I (and perhaps other people) contribute something regarding to the DE issue? Ralf thanks for the interest Ralph. the team could use your help. we have testing/planning always on going that any not-technical user could help with (i am that kind of user with no coding skills). i can only speak for my process for brainstorming the continued gnome2 support idea. i went to the IRC, pinged team lead Scott Lavendar (ScottL) and actually havent had a chance to talk to him about it yet. then, i sent an email to the ubuntustudio-devel list asking briefly 'is this even possible' and i had a chat on the IRC with user 'ailo' about it. moving forward from there will depend on what ScottL says when we catch up later today. its really up to you how you want to get involved in these changes. if you would like to schedule some time on the IRC, i can make a 30 minute window available for you and i to hang and communicate in the -devel channel. i really appreciate this attitude. we, as a community (especially the ubuntustudio community) need to adopt an attitude 'if its broke, fix it'. there are simple things that you and i as non-technical users can do such as documentation, wiki updating, advocacy and meeting planning. let me know when you would like to meet up on the IRC. thats really where realtime discussion and collaboration happens. thanks -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ http://wnclug.ourproject.org/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
Am 16.05.2011 08:43, schrieb aYo Binitie: Hi Scott, Your opinions are noted and they are valid. I never claimed that XFCE was no good - just that I had never used it and there were probably good reasons why it was second best to Gnome2. I assure you and everyone who has reservations towards XFCE: it is quite the same as Gnome2 and can be configured to mimic it near to 99%. It even offers some features, Gnome has dropped like switching Desktops with the mouse wheel on any place on the desktop and some more options for configuration. I use Gnome in Ubuntu and XFCE on Fedora on a dayly basis and I hardly notice the differnces (there are some inconveniences in Gnome, I can feel 1-2 times per day...) Plus: Gnome2, XFCE, KDE have more or less the same basic features that are the ones the user is confronted frequently. All these full-featured desktops can be configured to mimic each other in a way that no user without a lot of experience will notice the differences. All of them can have a hierarchical menu in the upper left corner, desktop icons, panels, a pager and a tray. And they suppport each others panel-applets or have similar applets as their siblings. I really think, that nobody, who has used Gnome2 the way a typical normal user uses a desktop will be apalled by XFCE. best regs HZN Having said that considering the fact that going forward there is a need for a new desktop to be adopted - I acquiese to the fact that you - the UbuntuStudio team have done your due-diligence and have found this the sensible and viable option. I will take you up on your suggestion and try Xubuntu to see for myself the possibilities therein. I have converted the entire Flash development (and IT ) team in my Agency to the Ubuntuside thus my interest in this is tremendous. aYo On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Scott Lavenderscottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: I apologize for singling out this post, but... On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:37 AM, aYo Binitieayobini...@gmail.com wrote: XFCE - I have no idea about but it was super we would not be all having these rants. aYo -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users I think this is a very, very poor argument. But iyou are not alone however. I haven't read any rants in this thread (well, maybe one) but I have seen a lot of ignorant whinging. There has been a vocal minority that asked, Why change from GNOME 2? or some other variant of that statement. But it appears that these people neither understand why we made a decision nor have any understanding of XFCE and how similar it is to GNOME 2. So, the rants are ignorant protestations about change. This has no reflection on XFCE. I challenge you (not just you aYo, but everyone) who thinks XFCE isn't super or good or isn't GNOME 2 to actually try it. Try it for a week. A day, even. If someone can use XFCE and then provide a good fact based argument for not using XFCE *OR* can provide a viable alternative we would very much like to hear them. I mean that sincerely. What I don't like, appreciate, or find useful is ignorant whinging without providing any reasons, facts, or alternatives. ScottL -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
RE: Xfce
My two cents: I haven't looked at Xfce in a long while, so I thought it was getting long in the tooth. I did a little research, and it's apparently not true at all. In fact, a new (and VERY updated) version just came out in January. While I haven't actually tried it yet, it seems very easy to use. It certainly seems more intuitive than Gnome3 for those users switching from Mac or Win, if that's a priority. I also like it because it is lighter on system resources than its competitors, and that's pretty vital for an A/V distro. If we made the switch, would this mean that UbuStu would have its parent distro be Xubuntu, rather than Ubuntu? Or is it that ubuntustudio-desktop would assume vanilla Ubuntu, and make the switch when you install it (e.g. downloading Xfce and dependencies at that point)? I'm not a distributor by any stretch of the imagination, so I don't know how that would work. Also - though I don't know of any offhand, are there any apps that require Gnome to work? Probably not audio, but I could possibly see some issues with video editing apps. In any case - if it is possible to still have the old Gnome2 ubuntustudio-desktop package in the repos, even without any changes or support, then I would suggest this be done. At least in the interim, until everything gets sorted. Obviously that's additional work, so it's understandable if it's not a high priority. -Karl. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.dewrote: Am 16.05.2011 08:43, schrieb aYo Binitie: Hi Scott, Your opinions are noted and they are valid. I never claimed that XFCE was no good - just that I had never used it and there were probably good reasons why it was second best to Gnome2. I assure you and everyone who has reservations towards XFCE: it is quite the same as Gnome2 and can be configured to mimic it near to 99%. It even offers some features, Gnome has dropped like switching Desktops with the mouse wheel on any place on the desktop and some more options for configuration. I use Gnome in Ubuntu and XFCE on Fedora on a dayly basis and I hardly notice the differnces (there are some inconveniences in Gnome, I can feel 1-2 times per day...) Plus: Gnome2, XFCE, KDE have more or less the same basic features that are the ones the user is confronted frequently. All these full-featured desktops can be configured to mimic each other in a way that no user without a lot of experience will notice the differences. All of them can have a hierarchical menu in the upper left corner, desktop icons, panels, a pager and a tray. And they suppport each others panel-applets or have similar applets as their siblings. I really think, that nobody, who has used Gnome2 the way a typical normal user uses a desktop will be apalled by XFCE. best regs HZN Having said that considering the fact that going forward there is a need for a new desktop to be adopted - I acquiese to the fact that you - the UbuntuStudio team have done your due-diligence and have found this the sensible and viable option. I will take you up on your suggestion and try Xubuntu to see for myself the possibilities therein. I have converted the entire Flash development (and IT ) team in my Agency to the Ubuntuside thus my interest in this is tremendous. aYo On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Scott Lavenderscottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: I apologize for singling out this post, but... On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:37 AM, aYo Binitieayobini...@gmail.com wrote: XFCE - I have no idea about but it was super we would not be all having these rants. aYo -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users I think this is a very, very poor argument. But iyou are not alone however. I haven't read any rants in this thread (well, maybe one) but I have seen a lot of ignorant whinging. There has been a vocal minority that asked, Why change from GNOME 2? or some other variant of that statement. But it appears that these people neither understand why we made a decision nor have any understanding of XFCE and how similar it is to GNOME 2. So, the rants are ignorant protestations about change. This has no reflection on XFCE. I challenge you (not just you aYo, but everyone) who thinks XFCE isn't super or good or isn't GNOME 2 to actually try it. Try it for a week. A day, even. If someone can use XFCE and then provide a good fact based argument for not using XFCE *OR* can provide a viable alternative we would very much like to hear them. I mean that sincerely. What I don't like, appreciate, or find useful is ignorant whinging without providing any reasons, facts, or alternatives. ScottL -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users Now, why is this a good thing? All this talk about switching DE for stability on the one hand but it's really about reverting to old stuff, isn't it?, and how long can the community keep this up?, tested out Gnome 3 last night a bit and I found it rather nice, I really can't see what all the fuss is about. I've always thought about linux as among the leading in osdevelopment, and especially US(the switch to an rt-kernel made a huge difference in performance on my stationary) and I think the community should embrace the future instead of trying to maintain things that probably has been dropped for a reason. Also, as someone said earlier, if it hasn't been done it may not be a bad thing talking a bit about to whom US is supposed to be for either, I have nothing to back this up but in my own experience, and I don't think I'm the only one to see this, I think Ubuntu is getting more OSX like and maybe that should be embraced as well. Many artists/producers DO use mac's and wouldn't this open up for a larger group of potential users? -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Re: *Official Announcement:* Ubuntu Studio is switching to XFCE.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Robert Klaar nim.b...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with this, the only argument I've heard so far is that it's different and sure, installed 11.04(with unity) to my laptop I use for backup a few days ago and it is different but nothing that you won't get used to, in some ways I like it even better, for one it's layout seems a bit more simplistic than I find standard gnome-based systems to be. Even though this might change workflow for some, the cons of switching to a fairly less supported DE in return for this, are probably worse. If there is one thing I've learned in these years using linux is to go with the mainstream and use what people use most, not doing so might land you in a position where something as basic, for a musician, as getting your soundcard to work seem hopeless due to lack of support. The main strength in Ubuntu, especially, has always been the vast number of people who use it, this is also my main reason for using US, because it's basically Ubuntu, with a lot of useful stuff added to it, forking of now might cut you out of the circle in the future. Even though XFCE is fairly similar to gnome, when gnome changes and Ubuntu with it so will the knowledge built up by it's vast community and I think US would be wise to stay as close as possible to it, and even though switching DE's is not really that drastic, changing something like this might make it a lot more harder for an artist or a producer etc., with little computer experience, solving problems as the solution found in the forums might not be enough. Now, this is not a problem for most people who use linux since you get used to these things after a while switching distro's aso. and in general you get better at it but not everyone does this, especially not your typical artist type, that's why many musicians prefer mac's. And that's what most people are like, I think it's a bad idea to limit US only to people with experience in linux and even though switching DE's might not do this now, it sets a path towards it. robert, i for one really appreciate your well thought out statements. you have some very valid points. one of which i would like to bring up for debate here. do you feel like moving from gnome2 to gnome3 is a more drastic change than moving from gnome2 to XFCE? that was one of the selling points of this move. even though we will be moving from the mainstream ubuntu workflow, we feil like this move to XFCE would actually be *less* disruptive than moving to unity or gnome3 (from gnome2). another selling point was also that we feel XFCE is very well supported, and well developed. the hardware support will always be the same as buntu though. a kernel update will be more likely to break functionality than the UI change. however, i dont feel like we should *not* upgrade the kernel. i think most linux users expect possible changes in support when going to a newer kernel version. ... Well, either way you risk loosing supporters but in my opinion it's much worse to risk being outdated than getting a bit of disruption for some time(and I can't see how this can get so disruptive to a serious producer/artist that it get's such a big problem, but this is just my opinion). ...this debate really comes down to the basic question, 'what is ubuntustudio doing?'. whos is it for. are we attracting new users? studio engineers? video professionals?. this is something we are constantly trying to be more clear about. right now, a move to XFCE has the intention of being the least disruptive change, while maintaining a similar workflow, and also pooling our resources with the xubuntu team. adopting early hopefully means that by the next LTS (12.04), things will be nice and solid and working well. if we are to target current ubuntu users, then unity would be the way to go. if we are to target OSX users or audio professionals, then the current plan to use XFCE with the AWN dock actually might be the best idea. XFCE+AWN has a very OSX look and feel (much more so that the current ubuntutsudio) which i think is arguably a good improvement, and easily facilitates some nice 'workflow' ideas that scott lavender has proposed. what do you think would be a target audience? and how to best implement a DE for them? Well, either way the system seems to go towards a more OSX like feeling, however I can't help but like the inovative style of Gnome 3, atm. I'm running 10.10 with cairodock(which for some reason worked better than awn for me, also, to me, it's visually more appealing) and it feels a lot like OSX. This being said, I'm not a huge fan of OSX myself, obviously I found it rather locked and that's one of the reasons why I'm keeping my linux-based system over switching to a mac, also I don't think we should be locked into thinking that OSX is supposed to be the ultimate goal, in my opinion,
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome
bom dia, Gritar? eheheheheheheeh foi apenas um grifo. Paz -Mensagem Original- From: Zandre Bran Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:05 PM To: Lista de discussão do LoCoTeam Brasileiro Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome NÃO PRECISA GRITAR. -- Zandre. 2011/5/13 Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.com: Buenas o SISTEMA NAO È O CLASSICO, mas o UBUNTU que aparece na parte inferior da tela antes de eu logar Na combo posso escolher o modo classico tbem PAZ -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Natty - taxa de refresh 60Hz
Bom dia, No meu note tá td certo tb... o driver adicional instalado e tudo mais... Mas por que você precisa alterar o refresh? Para qual valor? Qual resolução você quer usar? Qual o seu monitor? Abraços Em 14 de maio de 2011 02:34, Renan Traba rv...@inf.ufpr.br escreveu: essa eh a mesma placa q a minha, ake ta tudo normal, use apenas o driver livre, ake ta funcionando Em 14 de maio de 2011 01:08, Carlos Alberto Alves dr...@predialnet.com.brescreveu: Olá para todos! Fiz um upgrade para o Natty, pois apresentava problemas com o driver ATI para uma Radeon 4200 onboard; a interface gráfica simplesmente não entrava mais, somente texto. O problema persiste com o Natty usando os drivers da ATI (11.5) do site e mesmo do Drivers Adicionais. Desinstalei e tudo volta ao normal. O único problema é que não tenho mais a opção de aumentar a taxa de refresh da tela; fica soemnte em 60Hz. Alguma dica??? MB Asus M4A785TD-M Evo -- * * Carlos Alberto Alves * * mailto:dr...@click21.com.br * * mailto:dr...@predialnet.com.br* * -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Renan Vedovato Traba Aluno de Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação pela Universidade Federal do Paraná Linux Register n°: 525911 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] ICAClient no Natty 64 bits
Bom dia João, Por que você instalou o Natty AMD64? Abraços Em 14 de maio de 2011 14:23, João Olavo Baião de Vasconcelos joaool...@gmail.com escreveu: Olá pessoal! Nas versões anteriores, eu instalava o pacote do ICAClient [1] 32 bits com o comando abaixo: $ sudo dpkg --force-architecture -i icaclient_11.100_i386.patched.deb No Ubuntu 11.04, ao tentar instalar, aparece a seguinte mensagem de erro: *dpkg: aviso: a ultrapassar problema porque --force está activo: arquitetura do pacote (i386) não combina com a do sistema (amd64) (Lendo banco de dados ... 237034 ficheiros e directórios actualmente instalados.) Preparando para substituir icaclient:i386 11.100 (usando icaclient_11.100_i386.patched.deb) ... Desempacotando substituto icaclient:i386 ... dpkg: problemas de dependência impedem a configuração de icaclient:i386: icaclient:i386 depende de libc6 (= 2.3). icaclient:i386 depende de libice6 (= 1:1.0.0). icaclient:i386 depende de libsm6. icaclient:i386 depende de libx11-6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxaw7. icaclient:i386 depende de libxext6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxmu6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxp6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxpm4. icaclient:i386 depende de libxt6. dpkg: erro processando icaclient:i386 (--install): problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de: icaclient:i386 * Essas dependências já estão instaladas. Provavelmente ele deve estar reclamando a falta da versão 32 bits das mesmas. Já removi o libmotif4 do repositório e tentei instalar um i386 (versão atual e a 2.3.1), mas ele também reclama de dependências semelhantes. Alguém sabe como resolver isso? Será que eu vou ter que ir instalando a versão 32 bits de cada pacote desse? Alguém está conseguindo usar o icaclient no Ubuntu 11.04? Valeu!! [1] http://www.citrix.com/English/SS/downloads/details.asp?downloadID=3323 -- João Olavo Baião de Vasconcelos Analista de Sistemas - Infraestrutura joaoolavo.wordpress.com -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] ntfs montado automático
Bom dia galera, É que a opção defaults assume como auto a montagem da partição. Talvez ele tenha que inverter, defaults antes, noauto depois, ficando assim: UUID=1240F5BF40F5A99D/media/sda3ntfs defaults,noauto,nls=utf8,umask=022200 Abraços Em 14 de maio de 2011 18:49, Carlos Ribeiro k4rib...@gmail.com escreveu: Oi Marcelo, Acredito que deve ser acrescentado o noauto como indicaste, mas permanecer o defaults. Deve ficar assim: UUID=1240F5BF40F5A99D/media/sda3ntfs noauto,defaults,nls=utf8,umask=022200 Carlos Em 14 de maio de 2011 12:12, Marcelo nunes dos santos marcelo7...@gmail.com escreveu: Ola, Se nao me engano é so mudar esta linha: UUID=1240F5BF40F5A99D/media/sda3ntfs defaults,nls=utf8,umask=0222 00 para: UUID=1240F5BF40F5A99D/media/sda3ntfs noauto,nls=utf8,umask=0222 00 Trocando o defaults pelo noauto ela deve parar de ser montada. Acho que era isto, faça um teste. Marcelo Nunes Dos santos -- TI Savarsul - nu...@savarsul.com.br Blog: makelinux.com.br Email/MSN: marcelo7...@gmail.com jabber: marcelo7...@jabber-br.org twitter: www.twitter.com/marcelonunes Em 14 de maio de 2011 10:55, Leonardo Bergamo leoberg...@gmail.com escreveu: Obrigado pelo retorno, Jeferson, Eu abri o arquivo /etc/fstab e mando o conteúdo dele abaixo, pois não estou em dúvida sobre onde devo fazer a alteração: Esse é o conteúdo do arquivo: # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/procprocnodev,noexec,nosuid00 #Entry for /dev/sda1 : UUID=f25c7738-f7f8-47fa-a9b8-a73784ee2651/ext4 errors=remount-ro 01 #Entry for /dev/sda5 : UUID=206d22c2-1976-49e7-ad3a-7a368974f34e/homeext4defaults 0 2 #Entry for /dev/sda3 : UUID=1240F5BF40F5A99D/media/sda3ntfs defaults,nls=utf8,umask=022200 #Entry for /dev/sda7 : UUID=d809da2e-98b1-42df-b60c-f1b0b5a6e5ebnoneswapsw0 0 #Entry for /dev/sda8 : UUID=5b45ad8c-6f74-41c8-b38b-e47c7f20456bnoneswapsw0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy0autorw,user,noauto,exec,utf80 0 Abraços Leonardo Bergamo Boa tarde Leonardo, Ele deve estar no /etc/fstab. Verifique se a linha referente a sua partição NTFS está lá sendo montada automaticamente. Se tiver dúvidas manda o conteúdo do seu arquivo para agente. Detalhe que para qualquer alteração neste arquivo tem que estar como root. O que eu recomendo é setar nas opções da partição o argumento noauto, que não efetua a montagem automática. Abraços Em 13 de maio de 2011 14:44, Leonardo Bergamoleoberg...@gmail.com escreveu: Olá, Eu instalei o 10.04 e fui atualizando até o 11.04. E ele continua montando automaticamente a minha partição NTFS. Eu queria uma ajuda: alguém sabe me dizer como eu desligo esse automático? Abraços, Leonardo Bergamo http://leober.hd1.com.br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português:http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Se eu tiver que me transformar naqueles que combato para combatê-los, prefiro entregar os pontos. Eduardo Guimarães http://edu.guim.blog.uol.com.br/arch2009-11-15_2009-11-21.html CARLOS E YARA RIBEIRO São Luís - Maranhão - Brasil -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] ntfs montado automático - obrigado
Bom dia Leonardo, Só uma recomendação da lista: Não precisa mudar o assunto do tópico, pois assim perde a ligação com o original, prejudicando a dinâmica da lista e dificultando a busca através de mecanismos de busca, como o google, por exemplo. Abraços Em 15 de maio de 2011 16:56, Andre Cavalcante andre.d.cavalca...@gmail.comescreveu: 2011/5/15 Leonardo Bergamo leoberg...@gmail.com Obrigado ao Marcelo e ao Carlos, eu consegui resolver. Abraços, Leonardo Bergamo Resolveu o quê? André Cavalcante Almada, Portugal Ubuntu User number # 24370 Quer saber sobre Open Source Software? http://sobreoss.blogspot.com Quer saber mais sobre Espiritismo? http://sobreespiritismo.blogspot.com Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Driver placa de video Intel
Bom dia Thiago, Infelizmente, se a placa já não aguenta muito bem no Windows, no Linux vai ser um pouco pior, pois a emulação de um outro sistema tem custo para o hardware, e acaba refletindo em queda de performance. Mas vamos dar uma investigada. Entre no terminal e rode os seguintes comandos: sudo apt-get install mesa-utils E mande o resultado para nós da saída destes comandos: glxinfo | grep direct rendering lsmod | grep video Abraços Em 15 de maio de 2011 19:02, Thiago Nascimento vieiratn.ubu...@hotmail.comescreveu: Beleza galera, meu primeiro e-mail na lista. Sou usuário iniciante de Linux e consegui rodar meus jogos de Windows via Wine, porém, consegui extrair muito pouco da minha placa de video. Ela é uma placa onboard do meu notebook, seu modelo é Mobile Intel(R) GMA 4500MHD+. Lendo algumas informações na internet descobri que tenho que instalar o driver desta placa no Linux. Não consigo achar o tal driver no site da Intel. Alguém ai que tenha a mesma placa já passou por esse problema, ou alguém sabe uma solução? Minha distro é o Ubuntu 11.04. Abraços! Obs.: Sei que é uma placa modesta, mas para os jogos que eu rodava no windows ela dava pro gasto. -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
[Ubuntu-BR] Placa de som externa para Ubuntu!
Amigos, por favor: que placa usar? Externa, para áudio e midi. Obrigado. -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] gparted não le minhas partições!!!
On Sun, 15 May 2011 22:47:34 -0300 felipe felipeban...@gmail.com wrote: Apenas para informar, quem passar por problema semelhante, o gparted não estava exibindo minhas partições de um hd informando que não podem haver partições sobrepostas, a solução foi usar a ferramenta testdisk (do pacote testdisk, que tem nos repositórios). Não documentei todos os passos mas foi muito intuitivo, abri no terminal com o comando testdisk, mandei analisar o disco, foi detectado o erro, e em certo momento, mandei escrever a tabela de partições corrigidas. Agora todas aparecem no gparted =) Felipe, por favor não altere o assunto do tópico inserindo [Resolvido]. Ao fazer isso você quebrou a hierarquia do mesmo, criando um novo. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [RESOLVIDO] gparted não le minhas partições!!!
Bom dia Felipe, Grande dica! Está registrada na lista E quando alguém apresentar algum problema semelhante, já sabemos o caminho que tomar para tentar auxiliar essas pessoas. Vivendo e enriquecendo... sempre! Vlw!!! Em 15 de maio de 2011 22:47, felipe felipeban...@gmail.com escreveu: Apenas para informar, quem passar por problema semelhante, o gparted não estava exibindo minhas partições de um hd informando que não podem haver partições sobrepostas, a solução foi usar a ferramenta testdisk (do pacote testdisk, que tem nos repositórios). Não documentei todos os passos mas foi muito intuitivo, abri no terminal com o comando testdisk, mandei analisar o disco, foi detectado o erro, e em certo momento, mandei escrever a tabela de partições corrigidas. Agora todas aparecem no gparted =) -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Driver placa de video Intel
On Mon, 16 May 2011 08:05:24 -0300 Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.com wrote: Bom dia Thiago, Infelizmente, se a placa já não aguenta muito bem no Windows, no Linux vai ser um pouco pior, pois a emulação de um outro sistema tem custo para o hardware, e acaba refletindo em queda de performance. Mas vamos dar uma investigada. Entre no terminal e rode os seguintes comandos: sudo apt-get install mesa-utils E mande o resultado para nós da saída destes comandos: glxinfo | grep direct rendering lsmod | grep video Abraços Não uso placas Intel, mas já ví algumas recomendações de instalação do pacote: xserver-xorg-video-intel Se ajudar... nethell Em 15 de maio de 2011 19:02, Thiago Nascimento vieiratn.ubu...@hotmail.comescreveu: Beleza galera, meu primeiro e-mail na lista. Sou usuário iniciante de Linux e consegui rodar meus jogos de Windows via Wine, porém, consegui extrair muito pouco da minha placa de video. Ela é uma placa onboard do meu notebook, seu modelo é Mobile Intel(R) GMA 4500MHD+. Lendo algumas informações na internet descobri que tenho que instalar o driver desta placa no Linux. Não consigo achar o tal driver no site da Intel. Alguém ai que tenha a mesma placa já passou por esse problema, ou alguém sabe uma solução? Minha distro é o Ubuntu 11.04. Abraços! Obs.: Sei que é uma placa modesta, mas para os jogos que eu rodava no windows ela dava pro gasto. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome
Bom dia Franco, O GDM (Gnome Desktop Manager, que é o gerenciador de área de trabalho gnome), mantém a úlitma sessão aberta como padrão. Portanto, basta você escolher Ubuntu Classic que depois disso você não precisará se incomodar em fazer isto novamente. O Gnome2 se tornará padrão. Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 07:20, Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.comescreveu: bom dia, Gritar? eheheheheheheeh foi apenas um grifo. Paz -Mensagem Original- From: Zandre Bran Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:05 PM To: Lista de discussão do LoCoTeam Brasileiro Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome NÃO PRECISA GRITAR. -- Zandre. 2011/5/13 Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.com: Buenas o SISTEMA NAO È O CLASSICO, mas o UBUNTU que aparece na parte inferior da tela antes de eu logar Na combo posso escolher o modo classico tbem PAZ -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Placa de som externa para Ubuntu!
Bom dia Renato pra vc também =P Para que você quer uma placa externa? Qual será a sua aplicação? Existe realmente a necessidade disso? Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:14, Renato Alvim renato.al...@gmail.com escreveu: Amigos, por favor: que placa usar? Externa, para áudio e midi. Obrigado. -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Placa de som externa para Ubuntu!
Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:14, Renato Alvim renato.al...@gmail.com escreveu: Amigos, por favor: que placa usar? Externa, para áudio e midi. Tenho o ubuntu-studio e uso a placa externa M-AUDIO FastTrack e funciona perfeitamente, sem nenhum problema. -- Abraços, Givaldo de Cidra Ser e Pensar Sempre no Objetivo é o Caminho para Alcançar o Sucesso -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [off-topic] Saindo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:26 -0300 Gisele Neuls gisele.ne...@gmail.com wrote: Devo reconhecer que o argumento é ótimo, e é bom saber que tem outros usuários de mint aqui. Vcs vão me tolerar perguntando coisas não exatamente ubuntianas sempre devidamente identificadas como off topic? Eu realmente não quero tumultuar a lista. Eu ainda estou um pouco insegura em aplicar meus parcos conhecimentos de ubuntu no mint, mas acho que vcs têm razão, posso aproveitar o que aprendo aqui. Já fui intimada a documentar minha experiência também, me foi dito que pode ser estimulante para quem tem medo do linux. Gisele, No final das contas, embora você esteja usando o Mint Debian based e não o Ubuntu based, não há muitas diferenças a relevar e provavelmente as dúvidas que poderás encontrar serão idênticas às do Ubuntu salvo aquelas oriundas de configurações específicas da versão. Quanto ao Skype, cuja atenção à versão para os Linuxs já não era lá grandes coisas, creio que em breve será apagado do mapa pela MS (por favor não iniciar discussão neste tópico)... então, os usuários optarão por migrar para outra alternativa open ou pela utilização da versão MS, virtualizada ou não. Bem, acredito que este tópico esteja encerrado pois, afinal, creio que você optou pela permanência na lista :) o que é bom e proveitoso para todos. É interessante ressaltar que, mesmo um membro não participando de soluções, o simples fato de postar uma dúvida e o desenrolar da solução desta já uma contribuição valiosa para outros que poderão vir a passar pelo mesmo problema. Toda e qualquer participação é valiosa. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Driver placa de video Intel
so um aviso, o mesmo programa grafico (jogo) q roda do windows, roda levemente mais lento no linux (por causa do X), e sob o wine tende a ficar pior, pois eh uma camada a mais entre o programa e o hardware, entao nao espere muito desempenho Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:24, neth...@logbin.net neth...@logbin.netescreveu: On Mon, 16 May 2011 08:05:24 -0300 Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.com wrote: Bom dia Thiago, Infelizmente, se a placa já não aguenta muito bem no Windows, no Linux vai ser um pouco pior, pois a emulação de um outro sistema tem custo para o hardware, e acaba refletindo em queda de performance. Mas vamos dar uma investigada. Entre no terminal e rode os seguintes comandos: sudo apt-get install mesa-utils E mande o resultado para nós da saída destes comandos: glxinfo | grep direct rendering lsmod | grep video Abraços Não uso placas Intel, mas já ví algumas recomendações de instalação do pacote: xserver-xorg-video-intel Se ajudar... nethell Em 15 de maio de 2011 19:02, Thiago Nascimento vieiratn.ubu...@hotmail.comescreveu: Beleza galera, meu primeiro e-mail na lista. Sou usuário iniciante de Linux e consegui rodar meus jogos de Windows via Wine, porém, consegui extrair muito pouco da minha placa de video. Ela é uma placa onboard do meu notebook, seu modelo é Mobile Intel(R) GMA 4500MHD+. Lendo algumas informações na internet descobri que tenho que instalar o driver desta placa no Linux. Não consigo achar o tal driver no site da Intel. Alguém ai que tenha a mesma placa já passou por esse problema, ou alguém sabe uma solução? Minha distro é o Ubuntu 11.04. Abraços! Obs.: Sei que é uma placa modesta, mas para os jogos que eu rodava no windows ela dava pro gasto. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Renan Vedovato Traba Aluno de Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação pela Universidade Federal do Paraná Linux Register n°: 525911 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome
o que ele quer eh usar o unity nao gnome2 o unity chama o gnome2 caso ocorra algum problema, entao possivelmente o unity esta com tendo problema ao carregar e o VB nao da um bom suporte a 3d ainda, talvez seja isso Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:28, Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.comescreveu: Bom dia Franco, O GDM (Gnome Desktop Manager, que é o gerenciador de área de trabalho gnome), mantém a úlitma sessão aberta como padrão. Portanto, basta você escolher Ubuntu Classic que depois disso você não precisará se incomodar em fazer isto novamente. O Gnome2 se tornará padrão. Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 07:20, Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.com escreveu: bom dia, Gritar? eheheheheheheeh foi apenas um grifo. Paz -Mensagem Original- From: Zandre Bran Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:05 PM To: Lista de discussão do LoCoTeam Brasileiro Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome NÃO PRECISA GRITAR. -- Zandre. 2011/5/13 Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.com: Buenas o SISTEMA NAO È O CLASSICO, mas o UBUNTU que aparece na parte inferior da tela antes de eu logar Na combo posso escolher o modo classico tbem PAZ -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Renan Vedovato Traba Aluno de Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação pela Universidade Federal do Paraná Linux Register n°: 525911 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
[Ubuntu-BR] Lançador sempre visível no Ubuntu Natty
Olá pessoal, Existe alguma maneira do lançador de apps do Ubuntu Natty ficar sempre visível? []'s -- *Diego Walisson* *diegowalis...@gmail.com twitter.com/dwalisson facebook.com/dwalisson* -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [off-topic] Saindo
Bela colocação ao final, amigo. Esse é o espírito real do GNU Linux! Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:46, neth...@logbin.net neth...@logbin.netescreveu: On Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:26 -0300 Gisele Neuls gisele.ne...@gmail.com wrote: Devo reconhecer que o argumento é ótimo, e é bom saber que tem outros usuários de mint aqui. Vcs vão me tolerar perguntando coisas não exatamente ubuntianas sempre devidamente identificadas como off topic? Eu realmente não quero tumultuar a lista. Eu ainda estou um pouco insegura em aplicar meus parcos conhecimentos de ubuntu no mint, mas acho que vcs têm razão, posso aproveitar o que aprendo aqui. Já fui intimada a documentar minha experiência também, me foi dito que pode ser estimulante para quem tem medo do linux. Gisele, No final das contas, embora você esteja usando o Mint Debian based e não o Ubuntu based, não há muitas diferenças a relevar e provavelmente as dúvidas que poderás encontrar serão idênticas às do Ubuntu salvo aquelas oriundas de configurações específicas da versão. Quanto ao Skype, cuja atenção à versão para os Linuxs já não era lá grandes coisas, creio que em breve será apagado do mapa pela MS (por favor não iniciar discussão neste tópico)... então, os usuários optarão por migrar para outra alternativa open ou pela utilização da versão MS, virtualizada ou não. Bem, acredito que este tópico esteja encerrado pois, afinal, creio que você optou pela permanência na lista :) o que é bom e proveitoso para todos. É interessante ressaltar que, mesmo um membro não participando de soluções, o simples fato de postar uma dúvida e o desenrolar da solução desta já uma contribuição valiosa para outros que poderão vir a passar pelo mesmo problema. Toda e qualquer participação é valiosa. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Cantasia for Ubuntu?
bom dia, esse é muito bom para gravar (simples e direto)! Só que quando você terminar o vídeo... até ele gerar o arquivo demora uma eternidade =( alguém conhece outra que seja mais rápido? Em 14/05/2011 23:29, Cicero Rocha escreveu: record-my-desktop acho que é isso Em 14 de maio de 2011 23:26, Markos Lacerdamarkos.r...@r7.com escreveu: Boa Noite Amigos da lista, Gostaria de saber se alguém conhece algum software similar para o ubuntu do *cantasia* estou ministrando um curso de Java na minha faculdade e gostaria de gravar algumas video aulas e para isso necessitaria gravar meu Desktop... Desde já agradeço !! :-) -- /Cordialmente, Marcos Lacerda Analista de Sistemas Época Distribuição Ltda marcos.lace...@epoca-distribuicao.com.brmailto: marcos.lace...@epoca-distribuicao.com.br +55 (31) 2128-5042 +55 (31) 8447-2297 www.epoca-distribuicao.com.brhttp://www.epoca-distribuicao.com.br Ubuntu User Id: #32286 Não existe NADA impossível. Apenas você que Não é capacitado para faze-lo. / -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Placa de som externa para Ubuntu!
Muito grato. É ela que vou adquirir! Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:40, Givaldo de Cidra givaldodeci...@gmail.comescreveu: Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:14, Renato Alvim renato.al...@gmail.com escreveu: Amigos, por favor: que placa usar? Externa, para áudio e midi. Tenho o ubuntu-studio e uso a placa externa M-AUDIO FastTrack e funciona perfeitamente, sem nenhum problema. -- Abraços, Givaldo de Cidra Ser e Pensar Sempre no Objetivo é o Caminho para Alcançar o Sucesso -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Placa de som externa para Ubuntu!
Minha placa parou de funcionar, tanto no Linux como no outro. E eu sou músico. Arranjador. Quero poder enxergar tudo o que se passa, além de uma boa qualidade de som. E tenho uma Encore fraquinha interna além da interna que veio com o micro. Nenhuma das duas. pode ser o cabo. Vou testar isso agora. Mas a idéia de uma placa externa não me sai da cabeça. Jpá tive antes e gostava muito. Espeto tudo ao alcance da mão ao invés de lá atrás no micro, por exemplo. Obrigado, amigo. Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:30, Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.comescreveu: Bom dia Renato pra vc também =P Para que você quer uma placa externa? Qual será a sua aplicação? Existe realmente a necessidade disso? Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:14, Renato Alvim renato.al...@gmail.com escreveu: Amigos, por favor: que placa usar? Externa, para áudio e midi. Obrigado. -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Cantasia for Ubuntu?
Em 16 de maio de 2011 09:23, Paulo Rogério Batalhão pa...@foxmail.com.brescreveu: alguém conhece outra que seja mais rápido? Um processador mais rápido, ou um vídeo menor (que não capture a tela toda), ou uma resolução de vídeo menor, ou uma qualidade menor no vídeo gerado (selecione antes de começar a capturar). Veja que é processamento de vídeo, é um trabalho computacional pesado, vai demorar mesmo. -- Humberto Fraga http://lixaonerd.wordpress.com Sur la tuta tero estis unu lingvo kaj unu parlomaniero. - Gn 11,1 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Lançador sempre visível no Ubuntu Natty
Bom dia Diego, Para manter ele sem ocultar é fácil. Entre no Gerenciador de Configurações do CompizConfig (Aplicações = Temas e Tweaks = Gerenciador de Configurações do CompizConfig), na label Área de Trabalho, entre em Ubuntu Unity Plugin, e na opção Hide Laucher coloque Never. Agora, gostaria de aproveitar o gancho para perguntar pra galera: alguém sabe como manter o lançador na parte inferior da tela? Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 09:21, Diego Walisson diegowalis...@gmail.comescreveu: Olá pessoal, Existe alguma maneira do lançador de apps do Ubuntu Natty ficar sempre visível? []'s -- *Diego Walisson* *diegowalis...@gmail.com twitter.com/dwalisson facebook.com/dwalisson* -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Lançador sempre visível no Ubuntu Natty
Olá pessoal... 2011/5/16 Diego Walisson diegowalis...@gmail.com Olá pessoal, Existe alguma maneira do lançador de apps do Ubuntu Natty ficar sempre visível? Mais uma vez, já estou ficando um pouco cansado de enviar o mesmo link, mas... http://wiki.ubuntu-br.org/Unity Abraços a todos André Cavalcante Almada, Portugal Ubuntu User number # 24370 Quer saber sobre Open Source Software? http://sobreoss.blogspot.com Quer saber mais sobre Espiritismo? http://sobreespiritismo.blogspot.com Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Lançador sempre visível no Ubuntu Natty
Valeu, Jeferson. Resolvido. -- *Diego Walisson* *diegowalis...@gmail.com twitter.com/dwalisson facebook.com/dwalisson* Em 16 de maio de 2011 09:57, Andre Cavalcante andre.d.cavalca...@gmail.comescreveu: Olá pessoal... 2011/5/16 Diego Walisson diegowalis...@gmail.com Olá pessoal, Existe alguma maneira do lançador de apps do Ubuntu Natty ficar sempre visível? Mais uma vez, já estou ficando um pouco cansado de enviar o mesmo link, mas... http://wiki.ubuntu-br.org/Unity Abraços a todos André Cavalcante Almada, Portugal Ubuntu User number # 24370 Quer saber sobre Open Source Software? http://sobreoss.blogspot.com Quer saber mais sobre Espiritismo? http://sobreespiritismo.blogspot.com Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [off-topic] Saindo
Olás amigos da lista. Infelizmente a Gisele não faz mais parte desta lista, ela já se descadastrou. Ela me mandou um email particular e me avisou que já tinha saído da lista. Provavelmente ela nem está mais lendo os comentários, ou se tiver é pelo histórico da lista. Abraços a todos Em 16 de maio de 2011 09:23, Renato Alvim renato.al...@gmail.com escreveu: Bela colocação ao final, amigo. Esse é o espírito real do GNU Linux! Em 16 de maio de 2011 08:46, neth...@logbin.net neth...@logbin.net escreveu: On Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:26 -0300 Gisele Neuls gisele.ne...@gmail.com wrote: Devo reconhecer que o argumento é ótimo, e é bom saber que tem outros usuários de mint aqui. Vcs vão me tolerar perguntando coisas não exatamente ubuntianas sempre devidamente identificadas como off topic? Eu realmente não quero tumultuar a lista. Eu ainda estou um pouco insegura em aplicar meus parcos conhecimentos de ubuntu no mint, mas acho que vcs têm razão, posso aproveitar o que aprendo aqui. Já fui intimada a documentar minha experiência também, me foi dito que pode ser estimulante para quem tem medo do linux. Gisele, No final das contas, embora você esteja usando o Mint Debian based e não o Ubuntu based, não há muitas diferenças a relevar e provavelmente as dúvidas que poderás encontrar serão idênticas às do Ubuntu salvo aquelas oriundas de configurações específicas da versão. Quanto ao Skype, cuja atenção à versão para os Linuxs já não era lá grandes coisas, creio que em breve será apagado do mapa pela MS (por favor não iniciar discussão neste tópico)... então, os usuários optarão por migrar para outra alternativa open ou pela utilização da versão MS, virtualizada ou não. Bem, acredito que este tópico esteja encerrado pois, afinal, creio que você optou pela permanência na lista :) o que é bom e proveitoso para todos. É interessante ressaltar que, mesmo um membro não participando de soluções, o simples fato de postar uma dúvida e o desenrolar da solução desta já uma contribuição valiosa para outros que poderão vir a passar pelo mesmo problema. Toda e qualquer participação é valiosa. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- *Conheça meu livro Lógica de Formação de Acordes! !* *Pedidos para o endereço :* *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com* * Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice ( http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office ( http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp). -- * []´s - *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo - -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Ávila (31)9325-6871 https://launchpad.net/~genin10 http://www.ubuntu-br.org/ A caixa dizia: 'Requer MS Windows ou superior', então eu instalei Debian/GNU Linux Ubuntu User #29645 Linux User #499959 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
[Ubuntu-BR] Ubuntu 9 não carrega mais
Olá todos! Eu tenho o Ubuntu 9 instalado num Netbook e tem funcionado muito bem. Ocorre que, aparentemente sem nenhuma razão quando o Ubuntu está sendo carregado, ele mostra o logotipo assim que carrega o modo gráfico e quando deveria mostrar a tela de logon ela aparece toda distorcida impossibilitando sua leitura e seu uso. Não consigo mais utilizar o Linux nessa máquina. Tentei as opções de recuperação no boot do grub mas não obtive sucesso. Alguém me dá uma dica? Detalhe, sou quase que completamente analfabeto em termos de linha de comando no Linux. Obrigado, Oquigibsom -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] ICAClient no Natty 64 bits
João, Usava isso no 10.10, ainda não tive tempo de usar na 11.04, meu desktop tá abandonado em casa https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CitrixICAClientHowTo E se puder avisar se funciona no 11.04. Abraços, | João Paulo de Carvalho Mandl | Em 14 de maio de 2011 14:23, João Olavo Baião de Vasconcelos joaool...@gmail.com escreveu: Olá pessoal! Nas versões anteriores, eu instalava o pacote do ICAClient [1] 32 bits com o comando abaixo: $ sudo dpkg --force-architecture -i icaclient_11.100_i386.patched.deb No Ubuntu 11.04, ao tentar instalar, aparece a seguinte mensagem de erro: *dpkg: aviso: a ultrapassar problema porque --force está activo: arquitetura do pacote (i386) não combina com a do sistema (amd64) (Lendo banco de dados ... 237034 ficheiros e directórios actualmente instalados.) Preparando para substituir icaclient:i386 11.100 (usando icaclient_11.100_i386.patched.deb) ... Desempacotando substituto icaclient:i386 ... dpkg: problemas de dependência impedem a configuração de icaclient:i386: icaclient:i386 depende de libc6 (= 2.3). icaclient:i386 depende de libice6 (= 1:1.0.0). icaclient:i386 depende de libsm6. icaclient:i386 depende de libx11-6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxaw7. icaclient:i386 depende de libxext6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxmu6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxp6. icaclient:i386 depende de libxpm4. icaclient:i386 depende de libxt6. dpkg: erro processando icaclient:i386 (--install): problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de: icaclient:i386 * Essas dependências já estão instaladas. Provavelmente ele deve estar reclamando a falta da versão 32 bits das mesmas. Já removi o libmotif4 do repositório e tentei instalar um i386 (versão atual e a 2.3.1), mas ele também reclama de dependências semelhantes. Alguém sabe como resolver isso? Será que eu vou ter que ir instalando a versão 32 bits de cada pacote desse? Alguém está conseguindo usar o icaclient no Ubuntu 11.04? Valeu!! [1] http://www.citrix.com/English/SS/downloads/details.asp?downloadID=3323 -- João Olavo Baião de Vasconcelos Analista de Sistemas - Infraestrutura joaoolavo.wordpress.com -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Cantasia for Ubuntu?
tibesti http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/tibesti-screencasting-app-for-linux/ att @firebitsbr -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Problemas na Inicialização
Eu conseguir instalar o grub, mas quando inicia o grub só lista o ubuntu. Tinha que listar também o windows e o mandriva. Alguem sabe o que pode ser?o' vem antes de 'trabalho' é no dicionário. -- Rafael Alves Feliciano Graduando em Ciência da Computação O único lugar onde 'sucesso' vem antes de 'trabalho' é no dicionário. -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Ubuntu 9 não carrega mais
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:01:46 + oquigib...@terra.com.br wrote: Olá todos! Eu tenho o Ubuntu 9 instalado num Netbook e tem funcionado muito bem. Ocorre que, aparentemente sem nenhuma razão quando o Ubuntu está sendo carregado, ele mostra o logotipo assim que carrega o modo gráfico e quando deveria mostrar a tela de logon ela aparece toda distorcida impossibilitando sua leitura e seu uso. Não consigo mais utilizar o Linux nessa máquina. Tentei as opções de recuperação no boot do grub mas não obtive sucesso. Alguém me dá uma dica? Detalhe, sou quase que completamente analfabeto em termos de linha de comando no Linux. Obrigado, Bem, como as versões 9 já tem seu suporte expirado, não sei se há possibilidade de correção de possíveis pacotes quebrados, salvo você desabilitar todos os repositórios e utilizar apenas os pacotes do CD de instalação. Uma forma de entrar é pelo modo seguro mesmo: Escolha a opção entrar normalmente, digite seu login, senha e startx. Carregado o sistema, vá em sistema, administração, usuários e grupos, marque seu usuário e altere a opção para entrar automaticamente sem solicitar senha. Reinicie e veja se vai. Preferencialmente, salve seus arquivos externamente e instale a versão Ubuntu Netbook Remix 10.04, é uma LTS com prazo de suporte até Abril de 2013. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Problemas na Inicialização
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:28:48 -0300 Rafael Alves Feliciano fael.anje...@gmail.com wrote: Eu conseguir instalar o grub, mas quando inicia o grub só lista o ubuntu. Tinha que listar também o windows e o mandriva. Experimente, já com o Ubuntu em uso, o comando: sudo update-grub Veja se restaura as entradas. nethell -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
[Ubuntu-BR] [OFF] Bug = LibreOffice + lo-menubar
Bom dia pessoal, Quando eu instalei o Natty, veio junto o BrOffice3, porém eu quis que a barra de menus dele ficasse integrada com a do Unity (no topo da tela), e esta função não é nativa do BrOffice. Pesquisando, encontrei o pacote lo-menubar, que faz isso. Até aí tudo bem, ficou bem bacana. Porém, hoje fui fazer uma planilha, e ao tentar congelar uma célula, reparei que o menu Janela não estava presente. Fui atrás e descobri que se trata realmente de um bug, onde foi confirmado pela equipe de desenvolvedores, porém ainda não foi alocado ninguém para solucionar o problema. Portanto, gostaria de convocar aqueles que também são afetados pelo bug, a se inscreverem nele como também sou afetado (This bug affects X people. Does this bug affect you?), pois acho que não está sendo tratado com tanta prioridade como deveria por não ter gente inscrita suficientemente para eles verem a importância da resolução dele. Atualmente tem dois bugs relacionados a este problema: Este: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lo-menubar/+bug/770715 Que é clone deste: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lo-menubar/+bug/760879 O mais legal seria se inscrever nos 2 bugs. E é isso aí pessoal, conto com vcs Abraços -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [OFF] Bug = LibreOffice + lo-menubar
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:39:01 -0300 Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.com wrote: Portanto, gostaria de convocar aqueles que também são afetados pelo bug, a se inscreverem nele como também sou afetado (This bug affects X people. Does this bug affect you?), pois acho que não está sendo tratado com tanta prioridade como deveria por não ter gente inscrita suficientemente para eles verem a importância da resolução dele. Atualmente tem dois bugs relacionados a este problema: Este: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lo-menubar/+bug/770715 Que é clone deste: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lo-menubar/+bug/760879 O mais legal seria se inscrever nos 2 bugs. E é isso aí pessoal, conto com vcs Já inscrito em ambos :) -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Problemas na Inicialização
Bom dia senhores, Eu instalei o Natty aqui no meu trampo, e tive um pequeno problema, pois eu instalei o Ubuntu a partir de um pen-drive. O que aconteceu foi o seguinte: eu setei na BIOS o boot pelo pen-drive, mas tive que colocar ele como disco primário, então ele foi reconhecido como SDA pelo instalador, e como o hd ficou como SDB, as entradas no arquivo /etc/fstab ficaram setadas todas para o SDB. Na primeira inicialização sem o pen-drive ocorreu o problema, pois sem o dispositivo o hd era tratado como SDA, e então o Ubuntu tentava montar as partições como SDB, porém o disco não estava mais presente (no SDB não). O que eu fiz para solucionar o problema foi: inicializar o live a partir do pen-drive, montei a partição / do hd, editei o /etc/fstab, alterando todas as entradas de sdb para sda. Salvei o arquivo e reinicializei o computador. Problema solucionado. Acho que deve ter ocorrido o mesmo problema com você Rafael. Faça o que o Salles recomendou: execute o comando sudo update-grub2 via Live, depois verifique como está o seu /etc/fstab, alterando as linhas que estiverem como /dev/sdb para /dev/sda. Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 11:37, neth...@logbin.net neth...@logbin.netescreveu: On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:28:48 -0300 Rafael Alves Feliciano fael.anje...@gmail.com wrote: Eu conseguir instalar o grub, mas quando inicia o grub só lista o ubuntu. Tinha que listar também o windows e o mandriva. Experimente, já com o Ubuntu em uso, o comando: sudo update-grub Veja se restaura as entradas. nethell -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [OFF] Bug = LibreOffice + lo-menubar
Opa! Vlw Salles! Em 16 de maio de 2011 11:52, neth...@logbin.net neth...@logbin.netescreveu: On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:39:01 -0300 Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.com wrote: Portanto, gostaria de convocar aqueles que também são afetados pelo bug, a se inscreverem nele como também sou afetado (This bug affects X people. Does this bug affect you?), pois acho que não está sendo tratado com tanta prioridade como deveria por não ter gente inscrita suficientemente para eles verem a importância da resolução dele. Atualmente tem dois bugs relacionados a este problema: Este: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lo-menubar/+bug/770715 Que é clone deste: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lo-menubar/+bug/760879 O mais legal seria se inscrever nos 2 bugs. E é isso aí pessoal, conto com vcs Já inscrito em ambos :) -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Problemas na Inicialização
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:54:21 -0300 Jeferson Rodrigues jefero...@gmail.com wrote: Bom dia senhores, Eu instalei o Natty aqui no meu trampo, e tive um pequeno problema, pois eu instalei o Ubuntu a partir de um pen-drive. O que aconteceu foi o seguinte: eu setei na BIOS o boot pelo pen-drive, mas tive que colocar ele como disco primário, então ele foi reconhecido como SDA pelo instalador, e como o hd ficou como SDB, as entradas no arquivo /etc/fstab ficaram setadas todas para o SDB. Na primeira inicialização sem o pen-drive ocorreu o problema, pois sem o dispositivo o hd era tratado como SDA, e então o Ubuntu tentava montar as partições como SDB, porém o disco não estava mais presente (no SDB não). O que eu fiz para solucionar o problema foi: inicializar o live a partir do pen-drive, montei a partição / do hd, editei o /etc/fstab, alterando todas as entradas de sdb para sda. Salvei o arquivo e reinicializei o computador. Problema solucionado. Acho que deve ter ocorrido o mesmo problema com você Rafael. Faça o que o Salles recomendou: execute o comando sudo update-grub2 via Live, depois verifique como está o seu /etc/fstab, alterando as linhas que estiverem como /dev/sdb para /dev/sda. Abraços Jefferson, me tire uma dúvida: Por acaso, além de setar o primeiro boot para o dispositivo USB, você também não alterou no bios a ordem de prioridade de boot para o pendrive? -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome
Boa tarde, Na verdade eu quero o Unit que não entra qdo eu altero as opções -Mensagem Original- From: Jeferson Rodrigues Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:28 AM To: Lista de discussão do LoCoTeam Brasileiro Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome Bom dia Franco, O GDM (Gnome Desktop Manager, que é o gerenciador de área de trabalho gnome), mantém a úlitma sessão aberta como padrão. Portanto, basta você escolher Ubuntu Classic que depois disso você não precisará se incomodar em fazer isto novamente. O Gnome2 se tornará padrão. Abraços Em 16 de maio de 2011 07:20, Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.comescreveu: bom dia, Gritar? eheheheheheheeh foi apenas um grifo. Paz -Mensagem Original- From: Zandre Bran Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:05 PM To: Lista de discussão do LoCoTeam Brasileiro Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome NÃO PRECISA GRITAR. -- Zandre. 2011/5/13 Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.com: Buenas o SISTEMA NAO È O CLASSICO, mas o UBUNTU que aparece na parte inferior da tela antes de eu logar Na combo posso escolher o modo classico tbem PAZ -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Unit carrega Gnome
On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:19:11 -0300 Franco Catena facdavi...@hotmail.com wrote: Boa tarde, Na verdade eu quero o Unit que não entra qdo eu altero as opções Se seu hardware de aceleração gráfica não suportar 3D ou não estiver ativado, o Unity não será carregado. Vá em Sistema Administração Drivers de Hardware e verifique se há drivers disponíveis para ativação de sua aceleradora de vídeo. Se houver, marque a Recomendada e ative-a. Reinicie. -- nethell (Salles) Ubuntu user 24389 Linux user 496632 -- Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
