from:"Joe Fawzy"

Fragment caching???

2011-08-06 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
is there something equivelant to fragment caching in wicket?
I mean , is there any way to cache the generated markup of a  component, and
on subsequent requests it just render this markup string?
if so, how one can store these fragments in external store? how that can be
configured or plugged in? to use some central caching like redis or
memcached

thanks

Joe

Re: Why isn't my stateless form recreated from page parameters automatically?

2011-08-06 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
it seems that

item.add(new TextFieldString(itemId, new
PropertyModelString(item.**getModel(),
itemId)));

should be

item.add(new TextFieldString(itemId, new
PropertyModelString(item.**getModelObject(),
itemId)));

Joe

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Mike Mander wicket-m...@gmx.de wrote:

 Hi,

 i would like to build up a stateless page for collecting an itemId and an
 amount from my user.
 The website should act as a direct shopping formular. The user only should
 insert the data
 and on form submission the itemId is checked for existence.
 A helper button should clear the field values from the appropriate row. All
 has to work
 without any javascript.

 My intention was that i create the stateless page, present it to the user,
 collect the data,
 submit the form, clear the row data and present the stateless page again to
 the user
 with data in row cleared. But i don't get it to work.

 My question: If i post the form an page is coming back everything is
 recreated and the values
 from the page parameters are not deployed to appropriate components
 automatically.
 Do i have to do this by hand? Or is there a way?

 I use wicket 1.4.17.

 Thanks for helping me
 Mike

 code
 HomePage.java
 import java.util.Arrays;
 import java.util.List;

 import org.apache.wicket.**PageParameters;
 import org.apache.wicket.devutils.**stateless.StatelessComponent;
 import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.**WebPage;
 import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.**form.Button;
 import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.**form.StatelessForm;
 import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.**form.TextField;
 import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.**list.ListItem;
 import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.**list.ListView;
 import org.apache.wicket.model.**PropertyModel;

 @StatelessComponent
 public class HomePage extends WebPage {

public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
final StatelessForm? form;
add(form = (StatelessForm?) new StatelessFormVoid(form));
form.add(new ListViewItemModel(item, items()) {

@Override
protected void populateItem(final ListItemItemModel item) {
item.add(new TextFieldString(itemId, new
 PropertyModelString(item.**getModel(), itemId)));
item.add(new TextFieldInteger(amount, new
 PropertyModelInteger(item.**getModel(), amount)));
item.add(new Button(clearContent) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
item.getModelObject().clear();
}
});
}
}.setReuseItems(true));
}

private ListItemModel items() {
return Arrays.asList(new ItemModel(0), new ItemModel(1));
}
 }
 /code

 ItemModel.java
 code
 import org.apache.wicket.util.string.**Strings;

 public class ItemModel {

private String _itemId = null;
private int _amount = 1;
private int _pos = 0;

public ItemModel(int pos) {
_pos = pos;
System.out.println(this);
}

public ItemModel(String key) {
if (!Strings.isEmpty(key)) {
String[] parts = key.split(-);
setPos(Integer.valueOf(parts[**0]).intValue());
setItemId(String.valueOf(**parts[1]));
setAmount(Integer.valueOf(**parts[2]).intValue());
}
}

public int getAmount() {
return _amount;
}

public void setAmount(int amount) {
_amount = amount;
}

public String getItemId() {
return _itemId;
}

public void setItemId(String itemId) {
_itemId = itemId;
}

public int getPos() {
return _pos;
}

public void setPos(int pos) {
_pos = pos;
}

public String createKey() {
StringBuilder key = new StringBuilder().append(getPos(**
 )).append(-).append(**getItemId()).append(-).**append(getAmount());
return key.toString();
}

public void clear() {
setItemId(null);
setAmount(1);
}
 }
 /code

 HomePage.html
 code
 html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.**apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-**
 xhtml1.4-strict.dtdhttp://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd
 
 head
 titleWicket Quickstart Archetype Homepage/title
 /head
 body
 strongWicket Quickstart Archetype Homepage/strong
 br/br/
 a href=/Home/a
 form wicket:id=form
 table
 tr
 tdItem/td
 tdAmount/td
 tdClear content/td
 /tr
 tr wicket:id=item
 tdinput wicket:id=itemId //td
 tdinput wicket:id=amount //td
 tdinput type=submit wicket:id=clearContent //td
 /tr
 /table
 /form
 /body
 /html
 /code

 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

serialization problem with spring

2011-07-31 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
i have a serialization problem with spring
My CreatePage class looks like:-

public class CreatePage extends WebPage{
@SpringBean
AccountManager accountManager;
}

as i am using @SpringBean , it should handle creating a serializable proxy
for me BUT

i got the following exception



ERROR - JavaSerializer - Error serializing object class
com.app.view.account.CreatePage [object=[Page class =
com.app.view.account.CreatePage, id = 1, render count = 1]]
java.io.NotSerializableException:
org.springframework.dao.support.PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1156)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeArray(ObjectOutputStream.java:1338)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1146)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeArray(ObjectOutputStream.java:1338)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1146)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:326)
at
org.apache.wicket.serialize.java.JavaSerializer.serialize(JavaSerializer.java:77)
at
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.DefaultPageStore.serializePage(DefaultPageStore.java:356)
at
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.DefaultPageStore.storePage(DefaultPageStore.java:142)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.PageStoreManager$PersistentRequestAdapter.storeTouchedPages(PageStoreManager.java:377)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.RequestAdapter.commitRequest(RequestAdapter.java:171)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.AbstractPageManager.commitRequest(AbstractPageManager.java:94)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.PageManagerDecorator.commitRequest(PageManagerDecorator.java:68)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.PageAccessSynchronizer$2.commitRequest(PageAccessSynchronizer.java:213)
at org.apache.wicket.Application$2.onDetach(Application.java:1548)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycleListenerCollection$3.notify(RequestCycleListenerCollection.java:100)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycleListenerCollection$3.notify(RequestCycleListenerCollection.java:96)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.listener.ListenerCollection.reversedNotify(ListenerCollection.java:121)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.listener.ListenerCollection.reversedNotify(ListenerCollection.java:112)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycleListenerCollection.onDetach(RequestCycleListenerCollection.java:94)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.onDetach(RequestCycle.java:540)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.detach(RequestCycle.java:479)
at

Re: serialization problem with spring

2011-07-31 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi

i am living on the edge ,using wicket 1.5RC5.1 (the latest)
and also using the newly released Spring data-jpa project for data access

i do not use or reference PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor
directly, actually i never know it is there  till i saw that error

based on its name it is an interceptor which translate the jpa or jdbc
exception to spring's counterpart

in AccountManager there is an instance of AccountDAO which use this
persistence technology

i thought it might be a solution to use kryo serialization as it does not
require the object to be serializable, but the site does not recommend using
it in production as it is in its early stages and not yet stable

Any help please?

Thanks

Joe

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Joe,

 Based on the depth of that serialization stack, I doubt it's your
 AccountManager proxy that's giving you problems. I usually just breakpoint
 NotSerializableException and walk up the stack to find the culprit. Any
 change your CreatePage uses a method on AccountManager that returns an
 object with PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor, then holds a
 reference to it? If so, that'll be a problem since Wicket doesn't know to
 proxy that one.

 Dan

 On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi
  i have a serialization problem with spring
  My CreatePage class looks like:-
 
  public class CreatePage extends WebPage{
 @SpringBean
 AccountManager accountManager;
  }
 
  as i am using @SpringBean , it should handle creating a serializable
 proxy
  for me BUT
 
  i got the following exception
 
 
 
  ERROR - JavaSerializer - Error serializing object class
  com.app.view.account.CreatePage [object=[Page class =
  com.app.view.account.CreatePage, id = 1, render count = 1]]
  java.io.NotSerializableException:
 
 org.springframework.dao.support.PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1156)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeArray(ObjectOutputStream.java:1338)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1146)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeArray(ObjectOutputStream.java:1338)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1146)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:326

Re: serialization problem with spring

2011-07-31 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi

actually for testing , i tried using the new kryo-serializer from wicket
stuff
IT DOES NOT WORK, actually it has many more errors than the default one,
actuallly it cannot serialize a JdkDynamicProxy which is the basis for
injection
If someone have a solution or workaround , please help
Thanks
Joe

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 i am living on the edge ,using wicket 1.5RC5.1 (the latest)
 and also using the newly released Spring data-jpa project for data access

 i do not use or reference PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor
 directly, actually i never know it is there  till i saw that error

 based on its name it is an interceptor which translate the jpa or jdbc
 exception to spring's counterpart

 in AccountManager there is an instance of AccountDAO which use this
 persistence technology

 i thought it might be a solution to use kryo serialization as it does not
 require the object to be serializable, but the site does not recommend using
 it in production as it is in its early stages and not yet stable

 Any help please?

 Thanks

 Joe

 On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Joe,

 Based on the depth of that serialization stack, I doubt it's your
 AccountManager proxy that's giving you problems. I usually just breakpoint
 NotSerializableException and walk up the stack to find the culprit. Any
 change your CreatePage uses a method on AccountManager that returns an
 object with PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor, then holds a
 reference to it? If so, that'll be a problem since Wicket doesn't know to
 proxy that one.

 Dan

 On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi
  i have a serialization problem with spring
  My CreatePage class looks like:-
 
  public class CreatePage extends WebPage{
 @SpringBean
 AccountManager accountManager;
  }
 
  as i am using @SpringBean , it should handle creating a serializable
 proxy
  for me BUT
 
  i got the following exception
 
 
 
  ERROR - JavaSerializer - Error serializing object class
  com.app.view.account.CreatePage [object=[Page class =
  com.app.view.account.CreatePage, id = 1, render count = 1]]
  java.io.NotSerializableException:
 
 org.springframework.dao.support.PersistenceExceptionTranslationInterceptor
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1156)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeArray(ObjectOutputStream.java:1338)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1146)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeArray(ObjectOutputStream.java:1338)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1146)
  at
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
  at
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
  at
 
 
 java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
  at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150

ComponentInitializationListener and the new 1.5 initialization

2011-03-18 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
does ComponentInitializationListener now have access to the markup as the
component.onInitialize()
Thanks
Joe

Re: Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 ?

2011-03-06 Thread Joe Fawzy

The jira issue said it has been fixed since RC1 and as i can see , it is
final in RC2
does that men that Page#onInitialize will remain final?
thanks
Joe

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3218
 There is a thread in the mailing list. Search in Nabble.

 On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi
  Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2
  i think this method ment to be overridden?
  am i missing something?
  Thanks

Re: Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 ?

2011-03-06 Thread Joe Fawzy

if Page#onInitialize will remain final can i use onMarkupAttached
instead for the same purpose?
Thanks
Joe

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

 The jira issue said it has been fixed since RC1 and as i can see , it is
 final in RC2
 does that men that Page#onInitialize will remain final?
 thanks
 Joe


 On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3218
 There is a thread in the mailing list. Search in Nabble.

 On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi
  Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2
  i think this method ment to be overridden?
  am i missing something?
  Thanks

Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 ?

2011-03-04 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2
i think this method ment to be overridden?
am i missing something?
Thanks

Page.add is final in 1.5 RC2

2011-03-02 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
Container.add is not final
why page.add and page.onInitialize is final methods

thanks

Re: [announce] Wicket Security 1.4 released!

2010-05-31 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
i heard a lot about this project but have no opportunity to play with it
i think a (detailed) tutorial or a getting start guide is required(for
someone like me) to begin using this

any pointers?

thanks
Joe

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Martijn Dashorst 
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:

 We are proud to release Wicket Security 1.4 final.

 Wicket Security is an attempt to create an out of the box reusable
 authenticating and authorization framework for Apache Wicket. It
 contains several projects which can be used standalone or in
 conjunction with each other.

 After testing the codebase for a while we did not find any issues.

 Differences between the 1.4-rc1 release:
  - upgraded dependencies to newest working versions (JUnit 4.x does
 not work with Spring)
  - versioned maven plugins to appease the Maven 3 gods.

 Many thanks go to Olger Warnier for the initial port of Wicket
 Security to Wicket 1.4.

 The release is available from the usual Wicket Stuff maven repository:


 http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket-security

 If you already depend on Wicket Security, all you need to do is modify
 the version of your dependencies in your Maven poms:

repository
idwicketstuff/id
urlhttp://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/url
snapshots
enabledtrue/enabled
/snapshots
releases
enabledtrue/enabled
/releases
/repository

dependency
groupIdorg.apache.wicket.wicket-security/groupId
artifactIdswarm/artifactId
version1.4/version
scopecompile/scope
/dependency

 Note that with future releases we will move to a new groupId and
 package name (since org.apache.wicket is reserved for Apache Wicket,
 and not 3rd party projects).

 The future of the Wicket Security project is to remain a standalone
 project (it will not be adopted by Apache Wicket), and will continue
 to be maintained by Topicus. If you wish to join please let us know!

 Emond  Martijn

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Application.runAs() Method...

2010-05-26 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
Please make this configurable(can be disabled) as i am on appengine, they
does not allow threads
thanks
Joe

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:34 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:

 Sorry, subject should be wrap() method, not runAs().

 On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:33 AM, James Carman
 ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
  I've been thinking about this whole idea of needing to access the
  application object in different threads idea.  What if the Application
  class had a method like this:
 
  public Runnable wrap(Runnable task)
 
  Basically, the Application would create a Runnable object that can be
  run within the context of itself (by setting/clearing the ThreadLocal
  variable).  Then, you can use that Runnable anywhere to run a task
  with all of the appropriate Wickety goodness set up for you (except
  for the request cycle of course because you're not executing within a
  request cycle).  Now, what the Application stores in the Runnable
  doesn't have to be the Application itself.  We can set up a static
  MapString,WeakReferenceApplication object on the Application class
  and when an Application is constructed, it registers itself (the key
  could be a UUID.randomUUID().toString()).  Then, we could have a
  method like
 
  public static Application get(String id);
 
  on the Application class to get back the original Application object.
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: adding behaviours

2010-05-20 Thread Joe Fawzy

hey, what is the prefered approach?
thanks
joe

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi
 i have a large number of components in a page that i have to add the same
 behaviour
 should i use the same instance for all or instansiate one for every
 component(that's what i am currently doing);
 thanks
 Joe

Re: Another Wicket Site

2010-05-20 Thread Joe Fawzy

lovely , needs some tweeks for google chrome
joe

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, chinedubond chinedub...@gmail.com wrote:

 nice love seeing Nigerians doing great things
 keep it up .

 On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Ajayi Yinka
 iamstyaj...@googlemail.com wrote:
  No doubt of a nicer alpha version. Keep it up.
 
  On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Ayodeji Aladejebi aladej...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  just to announce another wicket project I am working on. we
  just launched the beta version
 
  http://www.nelexnigeria.com
 
 
 
  --
  Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,
  DabarObjects Solutions
  Phone: +234 9 875 1763
  Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
  Email: d...@dabarobjects.com
  Web: www.dabarobjects.com
 
 
 
 
  --
  Ajayi S . Yinka
  +2348022684477
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

adding behaviours

2010-05-18 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
i have a large number of components in a page that i have to add the same
behaviour
should i use the same instance for all or instansiate one for every
component(that's what i am currently doing);
thanks
Joe

Re: efficient resource downloading

2010-05-10 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi dear
actually , access control and dynamic file generation requires using
services which is injected by spring
this cannot be easily done in pure servlet

my current solution using spring @Controller and write diretly to the
servlet response is somethingvery similar to writing a servlet
but as i am planning to deploy on appengine, the startup time for spring
especially when using spring mvc cannot be accepted (more than 30 sec)

so i am tring to figure out a pure wicket solution

thanks for your help
Joe

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 write a servlet

 -igor

 On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
  i want to know if this is an efficient way to download some files
 
  i want my users to be able to download certain files just to registerd
 users
  only so i can put that logic in the page constructor
  but is this efficient way to do this as this may be called thausands of
  times per hour   (the files generated dynamically)
  does the construction of a page and all the other bits is heavy for such
 a
  task
 
  i am using spring MVC right now with its rest style model and annotation
 but
  it seems to me too heavyweight for the task
 
  so is this appropriate?
  is there another way more efficient?
 
  public class DownloadManagerPage extends WebPage{
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
 
 public DownloadManagerPage(PageParameters parameters) {
 super(parameters);
 if (registeredUser(parameters)) {
 getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(new
  ResourceStreamRequestTarget(new AbstractResourceStreamWriter() {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
 public void write(OutputStream output) {
 output
 }
 
 public String getContentType() {
 return ..;
 }
 }));
 }
 }
 
 private boolean registeredUser(PageParameters parameters) {
 return ;
 }
  }
 
  thanks in advance
  Joe
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

efficient resource downloading

2010-05-09 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
i want to know if this is an efficient way to download some files

i want my users to be able to download certain files just to registerd users
only so i can put that logic in the page constructor
but is this efficient way to do this as this may be called thausands of
times per hour   (the files generated dynamically)
does the construction of a page and all the other bits is heavy for such a
task

i am using spring MVC right now with its rest style model and annotation but
it seems to me too heavyweight for the task

so is this appropriate?
is there another way more efficient?

public class DownloadManagerPage extends WebPage{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

public DownloadManagerPage(PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
if (registeredUser(parameters)) {
getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(new
ResourceStreamRequestTarget(new AbstractResourceStreamWriter() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public void write(OutputStream output) {
output
}

public String getContentType() {
return ..;
}
}));
}
}

private boolean registeredUser(PageParameters parameters) {
return ;
}
}

thanks in advance
Joe

about serialVersionUID in all components

2010-05-08 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi all

what are the side effects of setting serialVersionUID  on all page classes
and components
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

i am developing an application which will be deployed on appengine
appengine handle sessions by storing them in the memcache and data store as
there is no local filesystem
for its memcache everything must be Serializable, and as the session is
stored in the datastore , your session may last for several weeks even if
the web container expires it
Ok, when i develop my classes may change a lot hence the
auto serialVersionUID changes, making appengine complain as its session does
not expires

anyway , i think setting private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; on
every component will resolve it on appengine side,
but ,what about wicket side? does it have any implications or side effects?

thanks
Joe

change or replace css file on page reload

2010-05-04 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi all
i was wondering how could i change a css file on every page reload
i thought of using header contribution in onBeforeRender() ,  but it seams
to add the new the new css file
what i need is to replace a certain css on every render of a certain page

actually i can dynamically generate the css file using velocity or
freemarker ,but the question is how to replace the old css with the new one

thanks
Joe

Hi dear
thanks for the reply
i 'm in the first steps of application deployment on appengine with no
problems so far with my manual testing and with jmeter
if u have any tips or hints , that will be greatly appreciated
Thanks
Joe

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, jbrookover jbrooko...@cast.org wrote:

I can only say that I've been using Wicket on GAE for awhile and it seems
to
work pretty well, with some extra effort. For now, I'm just using
HttpSessionStore. I asked in the GAE forums about the performance there
and
they said session storage made heavy use of the MemCache to keep
performance
strong. It is possible that Wicket can store very LARGE objects in the
SessionStore, but that may be an indication of poor page detaching. After
making that improvement, my session data rarely exceeds 100K.

I may try out a pure MemCache version based on the link you provided, see
if
I can get it lower and less dependent on the session.

The only other serialization issues I've noticed deal with changing model
objects across requests - I instead am forced to replace components on
occasion, instead of replacing model objects. That's a hack right now and
I'll look into it later.

Don't know anything about JBoss.

Jake
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/GAE-serialization-issues-tp2068427p2075571.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

posting form outside wicket

2010-05-02 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
i have a form that i want to post its data to a page outside wicket ,
actually on other server ,done in ruby
i wanna make use of wicket form handling,model binding and validation...
etc. and when i click submit , the data sent to the other page using a post
thanks in advance
Joe

Re: posting form outside wicket

2010-05-02 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi dear
thanks for the prompt reply
aren't there any wicket method to do that?
then i have to cycle through all my form fields and get their params name
and values ,build a string ,make the request
OR there is a shortcut
thanks
Joe

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 use commons http client to issue an http post to the external server

 -igor


 On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
  i have a form that i want to post its data to a page outside wicket ,
  actually on other server ,done in ruby
  i wanna make use of wicket form handling,model binding and validation...
  etc. and when i click submit , the data sent to the other page using a
 post
  thanks in advance
  Joe
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: posting form outside wicket

2010-05-02 Thread Joe Fawzy

OK, got it
thanks
Joe

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:

 Wicket is for creating web applications - not consuming them.  So, you
 handle all of the form processing, validation, etc, all through Wicket.
 Then
 in your onSubmit, you need to consume a different application.  Wicket's
 not
 built for that part.  HttpClient is.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi dear
  thanks for the prompt reply
  aren't there any wicket method to do that?
  then i have to cycle through all my form fields and get their params name
  and values ,build a string ,make the request
  OR there is a shortcut
  thanks
  Joe
 
  On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   use commons http client to issue an http post to the external server
  
   -igor
  
  
   On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
i have a form that i want to post its data to a page outside wicket ,
actually on other server ,done in ruby
i wanna make use of wicket form handling,model binding and
  validation...
etc. and when i click submit , the data sent to the other page using
 a
   post
thanks in advance
Joe
   
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: GAE serialization issues

2010-04-29 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
Any ideas?
please i need these info asap ,i appreciate your help
thanks
Joe


On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi everybody
 i am developing an application on the GAE/J platform using wicket
 as i read through this list ,it seems that it is not a recommended
 combination due to some issues , specially the serialization issue
 BUT i have to deploy on appengine, so what is there any recommendations?

 OK, the real question is:
does anyone used the custom PageStore implementation described in:
 http://letsgetdugg.com/2010/02/07/clustering-wicket-for-fun-and-profit/
 or in:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg46421.html

 in production and  found that of real help?
 if so which one is better?
 what are the side effects of using each?
 can i have an implementation that fallback to normal sessionStore?

 Another question
 as its related to seialization,  can using JBoss serialization lib make
 difference in GAE case? as it is much faster
 if so where are the hooks , or the interfaces to replace the default
 serialization
 BTW. i know it cannot be used in the core wicket due to its LGPL lic.

 Thanks
 Joe

Re: using selenium

2010-04-28 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
any tutorials, how to,or best practice?
thanks
Joe

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:

 yes - the id path

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi dear
  what is wicket:path? do you mean the component id path,like:
  page:panel1:form2:component4
  or it is a library or what
  any samples or pointers please
  thanks
  Joe
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Jeremy Thomerson 
  jer...@wickettraining.com
   wrote:
 
   I think most are using wicket:path (which is output in dev mode)
  
  
   Jeremy Thomerson
   http://www.wickettraining.com
   -- sent from a wireless device
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
   Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:13 PM
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Subject: using selenium
  
   Hi all
   i am building an application which use ajax heavily so i have to use
   component.setOutputMarkupId(true)
   this generate unique dom id for the components which changes every time
 i
   load the same page
   when using selenium , specially with its Firefox ide , it depends
 mainly
  on
   the id attribute value and as this is dynamically generated by wicket
 ,it
   cannot work smoothly
  
   i can use xpath, but i then will lose some of the benefits of both
  selenium
   and wicket,
   selenium , i cannot use its code generation capability as it generate
  code
   based on the the id
of wicket(designer friendly markup) as i cannot freely change my
 markup,
   otherwise it will break my tests
  
   what is your experience
  
   thanks in advance
   Joe
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Asynchronous DataStore queries on GAE with Twig-persist and other DataStore related problems

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi dear
Begining from GAE sdk 1.3.2 , there is query cursors and you can have more
than 1000 result

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Piotr Tarsa piotr.ta...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I want to use Wicket with GAE and exploit all GAE features but some
 problems
 arise.

 1. I'm looking for a good solution for asynchronous simulteanous queries in
 Wicket. DataStore has a functionality of asynchronous queries so I would
 want to be able to fire various queries before rendering anything and then
 return the actual model objects when rendering particular component. I
 think
 of an Interface (or, better, abstract class) extending IModel with an
 additional method, name it prepareModel() which would run the asynchronous
 query, so getObjet would just wait for the query to finish and then return
 the result (this way total time spend of waiting for DataStore queries will
 be at most equal to slowest query). DataStore entities are organized into
 Entity Groups where there are ancestors and descendants. So sometimes to
 find an object I must first find the ancestor. So I would want to fire the
 prepareModel() for parent components first.

 2. DataStore doesn't support joins internally and it's queries are limited
 to 1000 results (this means that GQL COUNT will never return value higher
 than 1000 even if there's more that 1000 entities that mets the
 requirements). Instead DataStore provides cursors to retrieve more than
 1000
 results and GAE devs recommends using separate sharded counters instead of
 GQL COUNT's (of course if the result would never exceed 1000 then we shall
 use normal GQL COUNT). Are there any components (repeaters) in Wicket that
 supports that approach?

 3. I think that Wicket should be able to store pages from PageMap
 independently. This way we could store pages in separate entities in
 datastore (DataStore doesn't have schemas, one can store entities of any
 form as every kind) so fewer bytes would be transmitted to and from
 DataStore (Http Sessions are kept in MemCache and DiskStore).

 4. How to inject an DataStore object in Models that will be testing
 friendly?

Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi
i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
used by all the big companies , even microsoft
and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years

this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or just
pick YUI
thanks
Joe
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:

 Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
 reier...@gmail.com wrote:

  Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
  Ernesto
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
  
  
   2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
  
   Hi,
  
   Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
   use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
   specifically in YUI 3...
  
   Thanks,
 Istvan
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

using selenium

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi all
i am building an application which use ajax heavily so i have to use
component.setOutputMarkupId(true)
this generate unique dom id for the components which changes every time i
load the same page
when using selenium , specially with its Firefox ide , it depends mainly on
the id attribute value and as this is dynamically generated by wicket ,it
cannot work smoothly

i can use xpath, but i then will lose some of the benefits of both selenium
and wicket,
selenium , i cannot use its code generation capability as it generate code
based on the the id
 of wicket(designer friendly markup) as i cannot freely change my markup,
otherwise it will break my tests

what is your experience

thanks in advance
Joe

GAE serialization issues

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi everybody
i am developing an application on the GAE/J platform using wicket
as i read through this list ,it seems that it is not a recommended
combination due to some issues , specially the serialization issue
BUT i have to deploy on appengine, so what is there any recommendations?

OK, the real question is:
   does anyone used the custom PageStore implementation described in:
http://letsgetdugg.com/2010/02/07/clustering-wicket-for-fun-and-profit/
or in:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg46421.html

in production and  found that of real help?
if so which one is better?
what are the side effects of using each?
can i have an implementation that fallback to normal sessionStore?

Another question
as its related to seialization,  can using JBoss serialization lib make
difference in GAE case? as it is much faster
if so where are the hooks , or the interfaces to replace the default
serialization
BTW. i know it cannot be used in the core wicket due to its LGPL lic.

Thanks
Joe

Re: using selenium

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi dear
what is wicket:path? do you mean the component id path,like:
page:panel1:form2:component4
or it is a library or what
any samples or pointers please
thanks
Joe

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:

 I think most are using wicket:path (which is output in dev mode)


 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com
 -- sent from a wireless device


 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
 Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:13 PM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: using selenium

 Hi all
 i am building an application which use ajax heavily so i have to use
 component.setOutputMarkupId(true)
 this generate unique dom id for the components which changes every time i
 load the same page
 when using selenium , specially with its Firefox ide , it depends mainly on
 the id attribute value and as this is dynamically generated by wicket ,it
 cannot work smoothly

 i can use xpath, but i then will lose some of the benefits of both selenium
 and wicket,
 selenium , i cannot use its code generation capability as it generate code
 based on the the id
  of wicket(designer friendly markup) as i cannot freely change my markup,
 otherwise it will break my tests

 what is your experience

 thanks in advance
 Joe


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Spring ROO wicket

2009-06-21 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi you 'll find yourself locked to eclipse in general, not specfically to
spring tools as eclipse is the only ide with full aspectj support , which is
required to open and edit ROO files
the code generation tool will clutter your workspace with big amount of .aj
files, and here is the role of spring tools, it hide these files by default
for u
Joe

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Alex Objelean alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:


 I think it is very customizable. I see the addons as a kind of maven
 archetype, but much better Also, I don't think it resume itself to
 spring related tools... therefore there should be no problems creating
 addons for wicket or other web frameworks.

 Alex Objelean


 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  how customizable is it? eg is it possible to write a plugin that would
  generate wicket code instead of springmvc?
 
  -igor
 
  On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi deari think possibilities for integration is limited for the
 following
  reasons:
  ROO is using spring MVC for the web tier
  ROO utilize the REST pattern which is stateless by default while wicket
  strength is its ststeful nature
  ROO depends heavily on aspectj and spring tools
 
  if u use spring tools or eclipse , and u want use the data layer
 features
  of
  ROO , go ahead, this part is compatible with very much every web
  framework
  Joe
 
  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Objelean Alex
  alex.objel...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  Recently, I've discovered Spring ROO: a user customizable tooling that
  enables rapid delivery of high performance enterprise Java
  applications.  (http://www.springsource.org/roo). It doesn't have yet
  a final release (the latest release is a milestone), but it already
  have a lot of addons which can help you to build in minutes a complex
  application. I think that it would be great to have someday an addon
  for wicket.  I am curious what the community thinks about this tool.
 
  Alex Objelean
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Spring-ROO---wicket-tp24129391p24132040.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: File upload without writing to temp file (on Google App Engine)

2009-06-20 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi split it into small chunks and store each as a blob in datastore entity
Joe

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Dolejs Vlastimil ster...@atlas.cz wrote:

 Hi,
 I´m trying write wicket application for Google App Engine.
 App Engine has some restrictions, one of them is, that you can´t work with
 filesystem.
 I´m trying upload images with FileUploadField, but i get
 AccessControlException.
 Looking through source code i found there is DiskFileItemFactory, which
 puts large files (over 10kB) to temp files.
 Is there any way to redirect all data storing to memory?

 I also found, if I upload small file (smaller than 10kB) -
 DiskFileItemFactory store it in memory, but there is some FileCleaner class
 which cleans temp files and spawns new Thread (which is also restricted in
 App Engine). So it fails again on AccessControlException.

 Have you anybody solved problems with file uploads on App Engine?

 Thanks

Re: Spring ROO wicket

2009-06-20 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi deari think possibilities for integration is limited for the following
reasons:
ROO is using spring MVC for the web tier
ROO utilize the REST pattern which is stateless by default while wicket
strength is its ststeful nature
ROO depends heavily on aspectj and spring tools

if u use spring tools or eclipse , and u want use the data layer features of
ROO , go ahead, this part is compatible with very much every web framework
Joe

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Objelean Alex alex.objel...@gmail.comwrote:

 Recently, I've discovered Spring ROO: a user customizable tooling that
 enables rapid delivery of high performance enterprise Java
 applications.  (http://www.springsource.org/roo). It doesn't have yet
 a final release (the latest release is a milestone), but it already
 have a lot of addons which can help you to build in minutes a complex
 application. I think that it would be great to have someday an addon
 for wicket.  I am curious what the community thinks about this tool.

 Alex Objelean

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-19 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi dearfirst of all, why add another dependency,just for conversation
handling, while we have in wicket a strong ground for it
note: jsr299 is a big spec with a somehow complex lifecycle(which may not be
compatible with that of wicket) and really complicated bean resolution
strategy

second: wicket components are not 299 beans, wicket is an unmanaged
framework , u must create the components urself, not by the framework, which
is a requirement for jsr299
what can be done with web beans, is to inject its objects in wicket
components BUT u cannot manage wicket components as web beans , and for
example inject them or handle there lifecycle

Joe

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:43 AM, janneru jan.ne...@googlemail.com wrote:

 hi jamesjoe,

 which are the issues with clint popetz's current work on the
 webbeans-wicket
 integration (already contained in the webbeans preview) that you would
 write
 your own?

 cheers, uwe.


 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, James Carman
 jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:

  JSR-299 is somewhat of a moving target right now, so it's hard to stay
  up-to-date with it.  I'm mainly working with the OpenWebBeans folks on
  it.
 
  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   Hi all
  
   On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:44 AM, James Carman
   jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
  
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg 
  igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:

 you are free to implement this as an open source addition to
 wicket.
 there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host
 it.

 wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
 outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
 such things possible, not to provide an implementation.
   
And, those hooks are very nice.  I would only ask for some more
listener registering opportunities (like for listening to request
cycle events like begin/end rather than having to implement your own
request cycle).
  
  
   Yes this is a much needed functionality
   i think we may cooperate in that thing
   can u start another mail discussion suggesting ur needs , and make
  everyone
   participate
   Thanks
   Joe
  
  
  
   
   
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
   
   
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-18 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi alli am working on a prototype which i think will convince you that
conversation is an important concept, it is very onject oriented as wicket
is and has many use cases

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 you are free to implement this as an open source addition to wicket.
 there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host it.

 wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
 outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
 such things possible, not to provide an implementation.


yes, u r right, wicket can'nt be everything for everyone ,but the question
is how much this hook thing is the responsibility of wicket
do you really think wicket is only ui framework?with no scopes so why u
support sessions? conversation is much like sessions, it is just narrowwer

Thanks
Joe




 -igor

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hiyou mean: injecting webbeans conversation component in wicket component
 at
  construction time
  this is only what we can achieve with webbeans, as wicket component
 cannot
  be webbeans components (wicket is unmanaged framework)
  my idea is about native conversation support, which enable wicket
 component
  to be the component and the target for injection in a natural wicket way
  beside, why depending on external project when we have all the
 functionality
  we need as wicket is stateful and each pagemap is a conversation(long one
  which may be easily break down to smaller pieces)
 
  Joe
 
 
  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:22 AM, James Carman
  jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
 
  There are a few folks working on implementing JSR-299 support for
 Wicket,
  which would provide support for conversation-scoped beans.  I'm working
 on
  one currently and I believe that the jboss folks have one working too.
 
  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
   Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
   actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation
   scope...,
   so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
   i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a
 good
   begin
   then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
   ,joinConversation,mergeConversation
  ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
   and other concepts like workspace
   what do u think?
   Joe
  
  
   On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg 
 igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
only time will tell
   
-igor
   
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or
 it
  is
now a
 deprecated feature?
 thanks
 Joe

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
   igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:

 if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its
 the
   best
 choice.

 -igor

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
  But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
  i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack,
 work
around
  thanks
  Joe
 
  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  class mysession extends websesison {
   private mapstring, mapobject,object coversations;
 
   public mapobject,object getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
 return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
   }
  }
 
  -igor
 
  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy
 joewic...@gmail.com
wrote:
   Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation
 scope
  in
 wicket
   i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass
 object
  o
from
  page
   A - page B
   But if Object o in page A which - page B - page C - page
 D
  -
page
 E
   and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to
  pass
   o
all
   throught the way from A  ..E
   also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a
 set
  of
 pages
   ,this will be a nightmare
  
   so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and
   store
 these
   objects there
  
   i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation
 as
  it
  represent
   an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a
  previous
mail
 ,i
   've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i
 cannot
provide
 my
  own
   factory for one
  
   so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
   what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it
  reliable?
   can the core team provide some hooks to implement something
  like
   IPageMapFactory

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-18 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi all

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:44 AM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:

 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  you are free to implement this as an open source addition to wicket.
  there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host it.
 
  wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
  outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
  such things possible, not to provide an implementation.

 And, those hooks are very nice.  I would only ask for some more
 listener registering opportunities (like for listening to request
 cycle events like begin/end rather than having to implement your own
 request cycle).


Yes this is a much needed functionality
i think we may cooperate in that thing
can u start another mail discussion suggesting ur needs , and make everyone
participate
Thanks
Joe





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-18 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi Igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 class mysession extends websesison {
  private mapstring, mapobject,object coversations;

  public mapobject,object getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
  }
 }


in your last code line , do you mean pmap.getName() instead of pmap.getId()
as i cannot find a public getId() in ipagemap

thanks
Joe





 -igor

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket
  i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
 page
  A - page B
  But if Object o in page A which - page B - page C - page D - page E
  and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
  throught the way from A  ..E
  also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages
  ,this will be a nightmare
 
  so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these
  objects there
 
  i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
 represent
  an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i
  've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my
 own
  factory for one
 
  so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
  what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
  can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
  IPageMapFactory?
 
  thanks
  Joe
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-17 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket
i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from page
A - page B
But if Object o in page A which - page B - page C - page D - page E
and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
throught the way from A  ..E
also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages
,this will be a nightmare

so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these
objects there

i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it represent
an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i
've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my own
factory for one

so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
IPageMapFactory?

thanks
Joe

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-17 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around
thanks
Joe

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 class mysession extends websesison {
  private mapstring, mapobject,object coversations;

  public mapobject,object getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
  }
 }

 -igor

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket
  i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
 page
  A - page B
  But if Object o in page A which - page B - page C - page D - page E
  and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
  throught the way from A  ..E
  also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages
  ,this will be a nightmare
 
  so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these
  objects there
 
  i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
 represent
  an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i
  've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my
 own
  factory for one
 
  so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
  what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
  can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
  IPageMapFactory?
 
  thanks
  Joe
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-17 Thread Joe Fawzy

thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is now a
deprecated feature?
thanks
Joe

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best
 choice.

 -igor

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
  But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
  i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around
  thanks
  Joe
 
  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  class mysession extends websesison {
   private mapstring, mapobject,object coversations;
 
   public mapobject,object getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
 return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
   }
  }
 
  -igor
 
  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
 wicket
   i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
  page
   A - page B
   But if Object o in page A which - page B - page C - page D - page
 E
   and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
   throught the way from A  ..E
   also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
 pages
   ,this will be a nightmare
  
   so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store
 these
   objects there
  
   i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
  represent
   an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail
 ,i
   've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide
 my
  own
   factory for one
  
   so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
   what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
   can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
   IPageMapFactory?
  
   thanks
   Joe
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

2009-06-17 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation scope...,
so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a good
begin
then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
,joinConversation,mergeConversation ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
and other concepts like workspace
what do u think?
Joe


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 only time will tell

 -igor

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is
 now a
  deprecated feature?
  thanks
  Joe
 
  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best
  choice.
 
  -igor
 
  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
   But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
   i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work
 around
   thanks
   Joe
  
   On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
 igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   class mysession extends websesison {
private mapstring, mapobject,object coversations;
  
public mapobject,object getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
  return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
}
   }
  
   -igor
  
   On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzyjoewic...@gmail.com
 wrote:
Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
  wicket
i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o
 from
   page
A - page B
But if Object o in page A which - page B - page C - page D -
 page
  E
and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o
 all
throught the way from A  ..E
also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
  pages
,this will be a nightmare
   
so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store
  these
objects there
   
i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
   represent
an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous
 mail
  ,i
've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot
 provide
  my
   own
factory for one
   
so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
IPageMapFactory?
   
thanks
Joe
   
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

status of the PageMap

2009-06-16 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi alli was wondering , what is the status of the pageMap?
i saw in the wiki some articles talking about it will be deprecated, so is
that true? i can see it in the 1.4 docs, is that for backward compatability
or it still a essential part of the platform?
How can i plug my own custom subclass of PageMap and make the framework use
it instead of the stock ones
thanks
Joe

Re: status of the PageMap

2009-06-16 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi So this is the current status, what about future plans?,
How can i provide my own custom implementation?
thanks
Joe

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:

 in 1.4 it is still an part of wicket.

 But it is not that needed anymore as before but that is sinse 1.3 when we
 started saving to disk.

 johan



 On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 20:03, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi alli was wondering , what is the status of the pageMap?
  i saw in the wiki some articles talking about it will be deprecated, so
 is
  that true? i can see it in the 1.4 docs, is that for backward
 compatability
  or it still a essential part of the platform?
  How can i plug my own custom subclass of PageMap and make the framework
 use
  it instead of the stock ones
  thanks
  Joe

Forms and autoAdd

2009-05-22 Thread Joe Fawzy

hi allcan i use autoAdd() to add FormComponents to a form and expect the
form to behave normally and all its lifecycle get executed normally,
including model binding and error check
i know taht components added via autoAdd() didn't serialized or persisted
between requests , so how this affect form lifecycle
thanks
joe

Re: fragment markup resolution

2009-05-22 Thread Joe Fawzy

hi dearthanks for ur reply
actually i donot often use the wicket:child and wicket:extend as i prefer
borders for common layout
is this the only way to get the fragment markup in subclass
thanks again
Joe

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:57 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:

 The fragments should be able to be found in the parent class' markup
 file.  You don't need to duplicate the fragment definitions if you're
 using markup inheritance.

 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  hiactually i am making a framework over wicket in which i am providing a
  default ui in the base class , which can be customized by overriding in
  subclass
  in this case , when i subclass , i have to duplicate all the fragments
  markup ,instead of only what i need
  thanks
  joe
 
  On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Mathias Nilsson 
  wicket.program...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  Sounds like you should use panels instead of Fragments if they are used
  more
  then one time.
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/fragment-markup-resolution-tp23645152p23654434.html
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Ajax appends to a Table

2009-05-22 Thread Joe Fawzy

hi dearwicket ajax support is designed and optimised for **updating** or
replacing existing components not appending
actually u will find appending table raw a buggy feature in IE
i use a work around ,by adding several invisible rows then upon need i
update them one by one

Waiting for a better approach

Joe

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:

 You usually have to update the whole table via Ajax when doing
 modifications to it.

 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Luther Baker lutherba...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I have an 'Add Row' Ajax link and a Table. The table contains a list of
  todos.
 
  To 'add' a todo, I have created a single tr full of td's and input's
  that, via Ajax, get shown when someone clicks on the aforementioned 'Add
  Row' link.
 
  Now, on submission of said row, I'd like to append it to the bottom of
 the
  table such that, one might be able to add 'another' row.
 
  Is there an easy way to do this or would I simply want to encapsulate the
  entire table and refresh it via Ajax. I'm not sure that'd be as easy as I
  hoped either since, I'd be creating the markup, etc in the Java class for
  the extra row.
 
  Also, to be true to form, is it normal to show that tr of inputs
 without
  a formal encapsulating form tag or should I wrap the table in a big
 form
  to be sure any inputs in the table are formally encapsulated by a form.
 
  Just looking for some pointers in the right direction on basically, how
 to,
  via Ajax, create blank rows, allow submissions and then append said rows
 to
  a table without formally GET or POSTing the entire page. Many thanks.
 
  -Luther
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: fragment markup resolution

2009-05-22 Thread Joe Fawzy

Hi Jamesthanks for sharing this
i wanna ask , why there is not a unified effort for rapid application dev ,
why not combine wicket RAD , and wicket web beans and wicketopia

thanks
Joe

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:15 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:

 You could try something like this:


 https://wicketopia.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicketopia/trunk/wicketopia/src/main/java/org/wicketopia/component/editor/FormComponentEditorPanel.java


 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
  hi dearthanks for ur reply
  actually i donot often use the wicket:child and wicket:extend as i prefer
  borders for common layout
  is this the only way to get the fragment markup in subclass
  thanks again
  Joe
 
  On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:57 PM, James Carman
  jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
 
  The fragments should be able to be found in the parent class' markup
  file.  You don't need to duplicate the fragment definitions if you're
  using markup inheritance.
 
  On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   hiactually i am making a framework over wicket in which i am providing
 a
   default ui in the base class , which can be customized by overriding
 in
   subclass
   in this case , when i subclass , i have to duplicate all the fragments
   markup ,instead of only what i need
   thanks
   joe
  
   On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Mathias Nilsson 
   wicket.program...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
   Sounds like you should use panels instead of Fragments if they are
 used
   more
   then one time.
   --
   View this message in context:
  
 
 http://www.nabble.com/fragment-markup-resolution-tp23645152p23654434.html
   Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: IRequestTarget not serializable

2009-05-22 Thread Joe Fawzy

hi dearu have to process the target during its lifecycle time and store that
result into something serializable for future use
so u have to make the decision during the first request where the request
target is valid not the second
joe

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Juan G. Arias juangar...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have this link, that I create in different ways. It performs some logic,
 and then redirects to somewhere, depending on how was created.
 Here is the code:

 class SignOutLink extends Link {
  private IRequestTarget target;

  public SignOutLink(String id, Class redirectPage) {
  this(id, new BookmarkablePageRequestTarget(redirectPage));
  }

  public SignOutLink(String id, String url) {
  this(id, new RedirectRequestTarget(url));
}

  public SignOutLink(String id, IRequestTarget target) {
  super(id);
  this.target = target;
  }

  public void onClick() {
  this.signOutSession();
 this.redirectSignInPage();
  }

  public abstract void signOutSession();

  public void redirectSignInPage() {
  this.getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(this.target);
   }
 }


 On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  IRequestTarget is valid only for one request. Why do you want to keep
  as instance variable?
 
  -Matej
 
  On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Juan G. Arias juangar...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi all,
   I want to mantain an IRequestTarget in my component, as an instance
   attribute. But wicket cries about it's not serializable.
   Of course, it's right. IRequestTarget is not serializable.
  
   Why? Is something wrong with mantain a request target inside my
  component?
  
   Thanks!
   Juan
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: fragment markup resolution

2009-05-21 Thread Joe Fawzy

hiactually i am making a framework over wicket in which i am providing a
default ui in the base class , which can be customized by overriding in
subclass
in this case , when i subclass , i have to duplicate all the fragments
markup ,instead of only what i need
thanks
joe

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Mathias Nilsson 
wicket.program...@gmail.com wrote:


 Sounds like you should use panels instead of Fragments if they are used
 more
 then one time.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/fragment-markup-resolution-tp23645152p23654434.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

fragment markup resolution

2009-05-20 Thread Joe Fawzy

hi alli have several pages which have a lot of fragments , this works fine
when i subclassed this page class , i may change only one fragment or even
no one at all but override a method, yet i have to duplicate all the markup
for all the fragments even if they are just a clones of those in the bse
class
so , is there any way to make wicket lookup the fragments markup in the base
page if it is not found in the page or what
do i have to inplement custom markup resolver? any key or pointer on how
this can b achieved?
thanks in advance..
Joe

50 matches

Mail list logo