Re: [videoblogging] Skype With Video
Clint out of curiosity, when was the last ime you tried it... And what was the exact client you used on windows? Would be helpful if you had a version number too. -Mike On Dec 8, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Clint Sharp wrote: Michael Meiser wrote: ROCK! Good bye mac platform isolationism... hello friends who just happen to use windows. :) Damn fuscking cult business practices. BTW, ichat video does supposedly work with a windows AOL client, but I've never seen it work. -Mike I've done it, it works. Clint -- Clint Sharp New Media Guy Technologist ClintSharp.comContact Info: http://clintsharp.com/contact/ We are the media. Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Skype With Video
Just make sure it's the newest windoze version possible. I do it with a friend regularly. Works fine. Also should probably have at least Panther 10.3.9 iChat AV on the Mac. -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87 On Dec 9, 2005, at 12:07 AM, Michael Meiser wrote: Clint out of curiosity, when was the last ime you tried it... And what was the exact client you used on windows? Would be helpful if you had a version number too. -Mike Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
This is huge. Congrats Andrew and Amanda. Circulation will go through the roof. -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87 On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Deirdre Straughan wrote: TiVo Launches Test Of Video Blog Downloading Service Rick Ellis, Staff Writer POSTED: 10:24 am CST December 8, 2005 Digital video recorder maker Tivo is launching a trial run for a new video blog downloading service.The initial trial will offer TiVo owners of the company's broadband connected Series2 DVR's the opportunity to download episodes of the video blog Rocketboom.Rocketboomis a daily three-minute video newscast, which is heavy on the offbeat news and sardonic humor. The show is directed and produced online by Andrew Baron and co-written with host Amanda Congdon.The trial is set to launch Monday, and the daily videos should be available for viewing by early evening.TiVo owners can subscribe or get more details at http:// research.tivo.com/rocketboom/. http://www.nbc13.com/technology/5492610/detail.html Congrats, guys! -- best regards, Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Advice on m4v MIME types
Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Advice on m4v MIME types
mime-type for m4v is actually video/mp4 m4v is not really a new anything.. apple just made up a new file extension for the heck of it. FeedBurner should recognize the video and make an enclosure as soon as you give it a mime-type. If you are getting gibberish in your browser it means that the mime-type its returning is text/plain. The easiest way to add this mimetype is to upload a .htaccess file with the following line: -- AddType video/mp4 .m4v -- Create a plain text file, copy and paste the line above. Save it as htaccess.txt Then upload this file to the same directory where you keep the m4v files. Once its uploaded, change the name of the file to .htaccess (notice the dot in front). When you do this the file may disappear from view. This is okay, usually files beginning with a dot are hidden. -Josh On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] hi guys, how about this meet the vloggers in NY, then?
markus,deal, let me set up a pay pal thingy, I'll do it later on, maybe tomorrow now, 'cos i have done something nice in france and there is a vid conf tonight, i will get round to it. I promise.Paul On 8 Dec 2005, at 23:17, Markus Sandy wrote: ok, but i do get the furry cup, right? Paul Knight wrote: Markus What this space, mate watch this space... Besides, I want to see the unseen footage of your wife swimming with the dog. Paul On 8 Dec 2005, at 22:46, Markus Sandy wrote: i'd like to see a video post of that! Paul Knight wrote:Oh markus,You are making her blush!!paulOn 8 Dec 2005, at 16:11, Markus Sandy wrote: Paul Knight wrote:$50 sounds okay for a pilgrim like myself. The first week in June does sound better for me than April, gives me more time to save up some money. My wife Rachel used to live in NY, when she was growning up and went to the UN school there, so she will probably want to hang around for a few more days than the Vloggercom. I sure hope Rachel comes too! She certainly has many fans in the video conferences these days. By the way, great post you guys! A must see. http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com/2005/12/video-conference-3122005.html-- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.orghttp://digitaldojo.blogspot.comhttp://spinflow.orghttp://wearethemedia.comhttp://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS ▪ Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com It's worth a laugh and work friendly. -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPONSORED LINKSIndividual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Wired interview: Soderbergh
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/soderbergh.html Questions include: Have you thought about making a mash-up? with the followup of: Give me one idea for a video mash-up. Good stuff! Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Advice on m4v MIME types
I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot---it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the very least you can sends someone an SMS with a link to a simple little phone compatible page with a list of videos like rboom... But I'm always looking for better mechanisms. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 4:51 AM, Eric Rice wrote: I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot--- it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser groups-yahoo- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
Not mechanisms to get video like that, but some capture and save to WMV. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the very least you can sends someone an SMS with a link to a simple little phone compatible page with a list of videos like rboom... But I'm always looking for better mechanisms. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 4:51 AM, Eric Rice wrote: I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot--- it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser groups-yahoo- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:58:56 +0100, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the very least you can sends someone an SMS with a link to a simple little phone compatible page with a list of videos like rboom... But I'm always looking for better mechanisms. My phone is not state of the art, so it doesn't play video, but here are my options. - I have a drag and drop interface to my phone's file system in Windows. Available via cable (COM port), IrDa or Bluetooth. - I can recieve an MMS message which is basically just an SMS with a pointer to a special URL with text, audio or video. UMTS phones can play video, and there I would assume the easiest way to get video on it is just to point the web browser on the phone to the video. I don't know which formats are supported. I checked a couple of the cheaper UMTS phones just now. It seems like the Ericsson, Motorola and LG phones have have MPEG-4 support (and some h.263). There were no cheap Nokia UMTS phones, but the expensive one had 3GP and Real Player (WTF?) support as well as in-phone video editing. These are phones being sold in Denmark. I don't know about options in the US. Also 'cheap' in this instances is relative to other UMTS phones - they are significantly more expensive than regular phones. MPEG-4 seems to be the set standard on phones in Denmark (that probably means Europe as well). Of coure the Microsoft smart phones are different, but I don't see those around much. Now I want a new phone. I don't know how you can connect these UMTS phones to your computer for example. All seem to have web browser and Java capabilities so in theory you could write your own feed reader (or just visit the freakin' blog). They claim download speeds of up to 384 kbs, but a lot probably go to network overhead. Anyway, I imagine these phones connect to the computer in the same way my old phone does (Bluetooth or cable). I wouldn't buy a phone where I didn't have control over the file system. I know the US phone providers are probably screwing everyone over on that front. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
No dont rename to .mov, its not a technically valid thing to do and causes player errors. Have you tried renaming the m4v's to .mp4 instead? Its valid to do that as m4vs are just mp4's anyway. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging
I agree that it is a question that comes up again and again. But, I think rather than a poll, a list of editing software options for different platforms and their pros and cons might be more useful. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree that it's meaningless - as you say, it would be interesting to see what people are using. I think it works fine as a survey of what people in the group use, sophisticated or otherwise, given time to build a significant response. I've seen the question asked twice already, and I am sure it will be again. It'll be nice to, rather than repeat this same back and forth, give those inquirers an indication of the broad opinion of the group. I'm certain there are a few more encoders that could be added. Suggestions? joly At 09:51 PM 12/8/2005, you wrote: I agree the poll is meaningless. It also depends on what you're trying to achieve. Do you want sohpisticated titling capabilities? Do you need use chroma keying? Do you want real- time rendering for transitions? I too think FCP is by far the best choice from the different programs i've tried. But there also is a steep learning curve if you've never done any editing before. Plus it is difficult to say if one is better than another if you've never used the majority of them. I think it would be interesting to learn what people are currently using. Also some cameras allow you to edit on the actual camera although I imagine it would get tedious after awhile Will --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com --- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
How are you setting the mime-type? I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in browsers and so that wordpress recognized it and created the enclosure tags). I first set it as video/quicktime and now just changed it to video/mp4 per Josh's suggestion. Are you certain that you are allowed to use an .htaccess file on your server? On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot---it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: consistently kid friendly vlog links?
I started doing a list of places to point non-bloggers to various types of video, never finished it but I do have the following links. You might want to double check the surrounding videos before you link to these. I wasn't thinking kid safe at the time, just diversity. ==Sports== JD's Blog, he is a dad recording his son skateboarding http://jmdahl.blogspot.com/2005/09/skateboarding-wednessday-september-6.html =Animals== Cat Dancing Videos - http://junkuman.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/fuwari_20021211.wmv Dogs At Play - http://basykes.blip.tv/file/get/Basykes-DogsAtPlay817.wmv The Incredible Kayaking Cat www.twocarpenters.blogspot.com ===Dance=== Old School Dance History The Jit http://www.detroitdepot.net/depot/dance.php Video at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1943103191512069933q=jit Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to point the kids I work with toward vlogs they can watch that won't expose them to inappropriate language or material. The kids are viewing vlogs from schools in an after school program, so it's got to be the kind of thing parents and school administrators wouldn't mind. I know there are people who are revlogging linksIs there anyone revlogging links that are consistently kid friendly? If not, this would be a great service for someone to step up and provide. Thanks for any info on this! Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility
My points were made from the point of view that you have to assume that the vast number of viewers of any particular video content aren't going to know, want or be able to trouble shoot why an MP4 isn't going playing on their machine. It's easy for us geeks to over look this. My mom, for instance (and you have to assume that there are a lot of people like her on the internet) will never in a million years know to make Quicktime the default player for MP4 movies. She wouldn't even know what a MP4 is much less know that quicktime can play them. The same goes for plugins. Many many users aren't going to go looking for some plugin for WMP just so they can play MP4's. A select few will, but that's not really helpful when you want pretty much anyone to be able to see your stuff. The point is that there needs to be a solution that just works with little or no effort on the part of the end user. Flash video with all its flaws and limitations is the closest thing that we have to this. MP4 ain't it yet. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pat Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: At 12:17 PM 12/8/2005, you wrote: I tried going the MP4 route once and found it to be more trouble than anything. Not Win Media compatible. It was never designed with Windows Media in mind Bill. They don't necessarily open in Quicktime by default (which can be confusing to users when the computer asks what program to open something with). Ever heard of making Quicktime the default player for MP4? Not to sound critical, but I'm told this usually works There isn't really an obvious way to do fast start. And if you want to use 3ivx it's a multi step process. You can easily try making MP4 videos using H.264/x264 codecs. To learn more, go to http://x264.nl/ You would think that MP4 for video should be the ubiquitous format for video that MP3 is for audio--but it's not. I finally just went back to Quicktime. Give it time Bill. Give it time. :) Cheers for now Happy Holidays everyone :) Pat Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FEEDBACK EMAIL) Denver, Colorado PAT'S VIDEO BLOG - http://patsvideoblog.blogspot.com/ DIVB-TV | THE DUMBASS IDIOTS VIDEO BLOG - http://dumbassidiots.blogspot.com/ RSS FEEDS ON EACH PAGE PAT'S PODCAST VIDEO BLOG MESSAGE BOARD - http://patspodcast.proboards36.com/ SKYPE ME @ patspodcast Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
wow very cool! Way to go RB! - Dave -- http://www.DavidMeade.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility
It is ironic that Apple and Microsoft are mainly to blame for holding back the video revolution, by not joining hands on a single compatable format that plays in QuickTime for Mac and Windows Media Player for Windows. It just plain sucks, and if they're not careful the video version of mp3 will come along and teach them a lesson. Here's hoping. Regards, Richard -- Vlog: http://www.kashum.com Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
The best part about this is that they are giving all of us a new TiVo for Christmas!Thanks Andrew and Amanda!Serious BIG CONGRATS to this new phase of success for rboom. Your project has epitomized the power of the videoblog/vodcast medium. sullOn 12/9/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TiVo Launches Test Of Video Blog Downloading Service Rick Ellis, Staff Writer POSTED: 10:24 am CST December 8, 2005 Digital video recorder maker Tivo is launching a trial run for a new video blog downloading service.The initial trial will offer TiVo owners of the company's broadband connected Series2 DVR's the opportunity to download episodes of the video blog Rocketboom.Rocketboomis a daily three-minute video newscast, which is heavy on the offbeat news and sardonic humor. The show is directed and produced online by Andrew Baron and co-written with host Amanda Congdon.The trial is set to launch Monday, and the daily videos should be available for viewing by early evening.TiVo owners can subscribe or get more details at http://research.tivo.com/rocketboom/ . http://www.nbc13.com/technology/5492610/detail.html Congrats, guys!-- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
Using CPANEL to set it. I did this whole process before with 3GP files no problemo. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How are you setting the mime-type? I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in browsers and so that wordpress recognized it and created the enclosure tags). I first set it as video/quicktime and now just changed it to video/mp4 per Josh's suggestion. Are you certain that you are allowed to use an .htaccess file on your server? On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot---it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
Or corporate passover... At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] NY Times Hosts Vids all on One Page
A link from David Pogue's Circuits column: http://video.on.nytimes.com/ifr_main.jsp;jsessionid=ai11I_FPY6T6? nsid=a2118ee73:1080e39f68b: 4276st=1134141350167mp=FLVcpf=falsefr=120905_101550_2118ee73x1080e39 f68bx4277rdm=131537.78814316625 Not only has the NY Times gathered all its videoworks in one central page, but figured out how to deliver them more seamlessly across OS and browsers. The Times has heretofore only used Windows Media and Real as video formats. Now they've expanded to flash so everyone can have access to video. Of interest. Jan -- It isn't done alone. Pay more. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - education http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature . Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] a RSS2 feed with a download/viewing limit
Hello,I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the number of download/viewing:Get the rss custom feed from that page : http://podesk.com/feed_generator.php (do not copy paste this adress in iTunes or FireANT ! It will not work).The feed created will allow 5 views/Downloads, and then it will display only the preview of the video with your IP adress.Cheers, Bertrand YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
Corporate hangover if you're that kind of person. This is beginning to sound like the chorus of a song. On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:26:23 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or corporate passover... At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility
Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote: It is ironic that Apple and Microsoft are mainly to blame for holding back the video revolution, by not joining hands on a single compatable format that plays in QuickTime for Mac and Windows Media Player for Windows. It just plain sucks, and if they're not careful the video version of mp3 will come along and teach them a lesson. Here's hoping. Do you think either company would have chosen MP3 as the defacto format for podcasting? No way... they each would have pushed the format they are most invested in (AAC for Apple, WMV for Microsoft.) Remember that podcasting (despite the name) really happened because the individuals involved at the time saw the value of using open formats and protocols not controlled by any single company. The big question is, can we do the same thing with videoblogging? Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
Michael Sullivan wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? 2006: Year of the Mundane... Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes
I will have a look at native QT files with links, but I don't think such movies will be playable by other players than quicktime...Bertrand2005/12/8, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:10:57 +0100, bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's SMIL based, I've automated the whole process within the Podesk software I'm developping. (dynamic layout and buttons customization). I was sort of hoping for native QT files since you had Java runtime listedass a requirement on the website (Linkubator is SMIL too, with all thatimplies). :o)- Andreas--URL: http://www.solitude.dk/Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:41:08 +0100, bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will have a look at native QT files with links, but I don't think such movies will be playable by other players than quicktime... They won't be. But SMIL won't either. Quicktime SMIL is not really SMIL (you have to break XML wellformedness), so it most likely won't play outside Quicktime Player either. It works in iTunes because iTunes use the Quicktime Player for video playback. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Rec. Host Provider??
One solution is to go with Liberated Syndication (LibSyn), which provides unlimited bandwidth at a very low cost and is focused on serving podcasters, vodcasters, videobloggers, and other media types like us. I posted some info. about LibSyn yesterday: http://podcasterherald.com/?p=96I've been using LibSyn to serve my audio for about a year now without any major problems, and I'm considering using the service to serve up my video now, too. What I've been doing up to this point is use a free webhost to serve my site and LibSyn to serve its audio. It's worked excellently so far, Harold J. JohnsonPodcaster HeraldYour Podcasting Messengerhttp://podcasterherald.comOn 12/5/05, havilahland33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking about finding my own host besides blogspot. Any suggestions from the videobloggers on which host would be a good quality and affordable choice? Thank you. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes
Hello,I know, but the original movie inside the SMIL file will still be playable in other players (while using correct codecs), so maybe I will have to make a Real Player SMIL or a VLC SMIL or a WMV SMIL... The nice thing with SMIL is that it's really easy to make it server side, but I don't know the server side tools for Quicktime.Bertrand2005/12/9, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:41:08 +0100, bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will have a look at native QT files with links, but I don't think such movies will be playable by other players than quicktime... They won't be. But SMIL won't either. Quicktime SMIL is not really SMIL(you have to break XML wellformedness), so it most likely won't playoutside Quicktime Player either. It works in iTunes because iTunes use the Quicktime Player for video playback.- Andreas--URL:http://www.solitude.dk/Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging
Yeah I would contribute to that. I know that there are some open source editing suites that are coming along too that might be useful to some people that should probably get talked about some more. I can't think of names off hand but I have links to them at home that I can post in the wiki or even here if someone wants me to. None of which (that I've seen) are quite ready for prime time but look very promising. I would love to support a great open source editing software project. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill Streeter wrote: I agree that it is a question that comes up again and again. But, I think rather than a poll, a list of editing software options for different platforms and their pros and cons might be more useful. Would people here be willing to write up software reviews opinions on the videoblogging wiki? There is already a page for Videoblogging Software: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging_Software I've added a section titled 'Software Reviews and Notes' and a page for iMovie: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Review_iMovie It would be nice to have an ongoing conversation there that we could point people to when they want to choose what to use. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] a RSS2 feed with a download/viewing limit
bertrand wrote: Hello, I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the number of download/viewing: Get the rss custom feed from that page : http://podesk.com/feed_generator.php (do not copy paste this adress in iTunes or FireANT ! It will not work). The feed created will allow 5 views/Downloads, and then it will display only the preview of the video with your IP adress. Bertrand, you've misunderstood the length attribute of the enclosure element: enclosure url=... length=00:00:30 type=video/quicktime/ length refers to the 'Content-Length' http header, which should be the size of the file, not the time-length the media plays for. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.13 You should always use the Feed Validator to test the feeds you are creating: http://feedvalidator.org/ Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Rec. Host Provider??
Harold Johnson wrote: One solution is to go with Liberated Syndication (LibSyn), which provides unlimited bandwidth at a very low cost and is focused on serving podcasters, vodcasters, videobloggers, and other media types like us. I posted some info. about LibSyn yesterday: http://podcasterherald.com/?p=96 Thanks Harold! Forgot about LibSyn. Added them to the wiki: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Posting_Your_Videoblog Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
Year of the Node Michael Sullivan wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Links -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] M4v vs. MOV
OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are smaller, cleaner and more universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the right size. Works fine with iTunes. (BTW - I always tweak the settings to encode audio at 48k - it adds very little space to the stream and greatly improves program quality). Anybody else in vlogland had this experience? Hal Goodtree Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging
Bill Streeter wrote: Yeah I would contribute to that. I know that there are some open source editing suites that are coming along too that might be useful to some people that should probably get talked about some more. I can't think of names off hand but I have links to them at home that I can post in the wiki or even here if someone wants me to. None of which (that I've seen) are quite ready for prime time but look very promising. I would love to support a great open source editing software project. Awesome... I've added links for many of the apps listed so it'll be easier for people to add reviews, and I also wrote up my review of Audacity: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging_Software Make it a Wiki Friday folks... Go add something! Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] M4v vs. MOV
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:40:05 +0100, Hal Goodtree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are smaller, cleaner and more universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the right size. Works fine with iTunes. Apples and oranges. MOV isn't a codec, but a container format. m4v is just MPEG-4. You can create MPEG-4 in a MOV wrapper easily. If you want to compare m4v to anything you've got to pick a codec, not a container format. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: M4v vs. MOV
m4v is h264 in a mp4 container. So this discussion is really about mpeg4 vs h264 and the container format stuff cofuses the issue further. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:40:05 +0100, Hal Goodtree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are smaller, cleaner and more universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the right size. Works fine with iTunes. Apples and oranges. MOV isn't a codec, but a container format. m4v is just MPEG-4. You can create MPEG-4 in a MOV wrapper easily. If you want to compare m4v to anything you've got to pick a codec, not a container format. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility
he way I see it, mp3 support was an easy choice for podcasting to make, because mp3 had already become the standard for audio downloads, and portable hardware players. The same might happen with mp4 eventually, but it will take a while. We can actually find something to thank Apple for, as they could have made the ipod to only work with .mov's, rather than .mp4 as well. Im pretty optimistic that things will go well for mp4 on the encoding hardware mp4 creation side of things. The browser hardware mp4 playback part of the picture is not so far advanced, time will tell. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think either company would have chosen MP3 as the defacto format for podcasting? No way... they each would have pushed the format they are most invested in (AAC for Apple, WMV for Microsoft.) Remember that podcasting (despite the name) really happened because the individuals involved at the time saw the value of using open formats and protocols not controlled by any single company. The big question is, can we do the same thing with videoblogging? Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes
I'm using java client-side for the network connections.and I'm using QT pro features to encode movies.I found this tutorial that seems to be a good introduction to Quicktime API : http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/08/13/qtj_reintro.htmlBut I will check this out latter !Bertrand2005/12/9, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:15:25 +0100, bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nice thing with SMIL is that it's really easy to make it server side, but I don't know the server side tools for Quicktime.That's why I use SMIL too. :o) There's a Java API for Quicktime. That's why I wondered if you were makingnative Quicktime files, because you had Java runtime as a requirement.URL: http://developer.apple.com/quicktime/qtjava/packages.html - Andreas--URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: blogger template tinkering
Oh, this is perfect! Thanks so much! B --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Seiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your fun has yet to begin: http://glish.com/css/ and: http://glish.com/css/7.asp Before you go any further: make a backup copy of your current template! JS On 12/8/05, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I loves me template, but my sidebar is getting sort of out-of-hand in terms of length. [snip] Can anyone point me in a direction? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Sound editor features (was Re: New poll for videoblogging)
Friday, December 9, 2005, 4:46:13 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote: Awesome... I've added links for many of the apps listed so it'll be easier for people to add reviews, and I also wrote up my review of Audacity: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging_Software Cool. In your review of Audacity, though, would you (or anyone else with the relevant experience) like to add a bit more detail about the things it _can't_ do. I've never used any audio-editing software that cost money (unless you count the trivial apps that sometimes come as part of a video editing program), and to me Audacity feels pretty powerful. I guess I'm a newbie to the field of audio editing, and I'm finding it tough to imagine what useful features other programs might provide that audacity lacks. For example, I was amazed to find that Audacity can play tracks I have already recorded while I'm recording another one. I've never used any software that could do that, so I didn't even think to look for it. What else am I missing? What super features do others have that make Audacity look dumb and clumsy in comparison? -- Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] a RSS2 feed with a download/viewing limit
Thanks for pointing this out !I have corrected it.this feed was for testing the limit of allowed downloads, so I forget about the validation.Bertrand2005/12/9, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:bertrand wrote: Hello, I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the number of download/viewing: Get the rss custom feed from that page : http://podesk.com/feed_generator.php (do not copy paste this adress in iTunes or FireANT ! It will not work). The feed created will allow 5 views/Downloads, and then it will display only the preview of the video with your IP adress. Bertrand, you've misunderstood the length attribute of the enclosureelement:enclosure url=""> length=00:00:30 type=video/quicktime/ length refers to the 'Content-Length' http header, which should be thesize of the file, not the time-length the media plays for. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.13 You should always use the Feed Validator to test the feeds you are creating: http://feedvalidator.org/Pete-- http://tinkernet.org/videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
after you set the mimetype with cpanel you probably need to restart your apache server for the change to take effect. -Josh On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using CPANEL to set it. I did this whole process before with 3GP files no problemo. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How are you setting the mime-type? I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in browsers and so that wordpress recognized it and created the enclosure tags). I first set it as video/quicktime and now just changed it to video/mp4 per Josh's suggestion. Are you certain that you are allowed to use an .htaccess file on your server? On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot---it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: High Def over Internet.
Cheers :) By the way, the 2 links to samples on the following page dont work for me, they dont act as links: http://libsyn.com/podcasts/donmc/_static/page1/hidef.html Cheers Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Don McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve, You might want to check out my Video Podcast - www.ScreenCastsOnline.com I produce Video tutorials for free download in both 960x540 and in iPod format. 80% of the currently available screencasts are in 960 x 600 or 960 x 540. I've just started mastering in 720p (1280 x 720) and I'm making those versions available to the ScreenCastsOnline contributors, a small but very supportive group who donate $2 per month to ScreenCastsOnline. There is a freely downloadable (and streamable) 720p episode on my site or you can download it from here: http://libsyn.com/media/donmc/SCO0023_720p_Auto_Rapidweaver_Part_1.mov This is a walkthrough and introduction to RapidWeaver and runs for about 20 minutes. Not bad for a 112MB file. It was a first attempt, the second one is much better! Cheers Don On 8 Dec 2005, at 23:48, Steve Watkins wrote: Mmmm nice quality :) I like the 960x540 version, its still way higher res than people are used to on the net, and it works. But I am biased as I was waffling about 960x540 a while ago. Id sort of given up on seeing much content at those resolutions though, and started getting used to the idea of living with lower res stuff for longer than I had initially expected. the ipod helped, but yeah Id like to watch more 960x540 videos on my computer. Steve of Elbows On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 00:44 +, Digital wrote: My friend Bob is nuts. He is working on theater-grade high definition video over IP. I am working on him to get some lower rez vlogging going! ;) Check out a sample of what he is doing: http://www.endorphin.com/stories/hd/ WARNING. Very CPU/Bandwidth intensive!! YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Jakob Nielson On Talking-Head Videos
Richard BF,(boy this is confusing with all these Richards :)First of all, I really enjoy your videos. I just became aware of them lately although it seems you've been doing this (video blogging) a lot longer than me. Second, I certainly think Jakob Nielson (whose name I'm constantly misspelling, sorry) has done a lot of good in calling attention to usability and, on-balance, is certainly good for our community. A big part of any criticism of him comes from the fact that he is so popular and successful (I should be so lucky :). Third, I certainly appreciate what you're saying and you're probably right that was a touch unfair to Nielson -Fourth, you touch on a fundamental issue that I struggle with always when dealing with industry practitioners and their proprietary research. Since I moved from our Psychology department to Information Science and since my research has come to focus on usability and become more and more applied I have worked more an more with industry practitioners. They have been very good and helpful to me in understanding what my students will be doing in the real world, they come and talk in classes, and they have given me all sorts of advice and consulting for free and, most importantly, they've hired my students! However, here's the issue. (And this is not opposing anything you've said.)On 12/7/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The only time you'll see the more extensive research in his public or free newsletters or web site, is when the research is old, or he'sclaiming an opinion (as you say) which is actually based upon theresearch. In the latter case he won't quote the research, because hecharges for it, so it looks like he's just making it up. In my world, the method, analyses, and results of research are open to everyone. There are now some free ed research journals on the web where people even provide all of the raw data for anyone to look at our re-analyze as they choose. In addition, there is peer review, where things are not published until they are judged to be appropriate by experts. I , will admit that I have some issues with peer review in that I think it often tends to encourage research that is esoteric to some academic group pushing it away from the real world, but I love and am very attached to the notion that all of the research is open to anyone who can go to a library and check out the journal. I'm very excited by the movement in some academic circle to publish all research, for free, on the web. I post most of my papers, with method/procedures etc on the web and will post them all if I ever get the time. So, of course the point is, I have no way of evaluating the research that Nielson bases his claims on - I don't know anything about what he actually did. I'm not sure how to get around this - it's a fundamental problem that comes up for us more and more when we have grad students who are working in industry and want to do theses or dissertations for research associated with their jobs (important, real world research) but they can't release findings, and especially can't release info about their method - though these things could ultimately help people to design systems that made us all happier in dealing with interfaces - pretty frustrating. ... and, well, ramble ramble ... got to stop somewhere ... thanks for your message, and it's pretty cool to know that it sounds like you've spent some time in the user design world, which will make your videos even cooler ... best regards ... the other Richard -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
2006: IP Media.On 12/9/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- Ted Tagamitagami.comU N I V E R S U S SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Sound editor features (was Re: New poll for videoblogging)
Frank Carver wrote: Friday, December 9, 2005, 4:46:13 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote: I also wrote up my review of Audacity: In your review of Audacity, though, would you (or anyone else with the relevant experience) like to add a bit more detail about the things it _can't_ do. I've never used any audio-editing software that cost money (unless you count the trivial apps that sometimes come as part of a video editing program), and to me Audacity feels pretty powerful. I guess I'm a newbie to the field of audio editing, and I'm finding it tough to imagine what useful features other programs might provide that audacity lacks. For example, I was amazed to find that Audacity can play tracks I have already recorded while I'm recording another one. I've never used any software that could do that, so I didn't even think to look for it. What else am I missing? What super features do others have that make Audacity look dumb and clumsy in comparison? Frank, I don't have a whole lot of experience with other audio editing apps available today. (I did a moderate amount of audio work pre-2000.) Perhaps you could add your notes to the Audacity page? The whole idea is to get different opinions from different people. :) If you don't feel comfortable editing a wiki, email me your review and I will add it. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug
Cheers :) My impression of things is probably a bit wrong, Im probably underestimating the number of DivX certified players etc that exist. And yes when thinking of videoblogging, Im not thinking of the billions of legacy files that consumers want to play, indeed Im avoiding talking about that stuff at all because its 'grey' to say the least. Still it is similar to how mp3 become the established standard for audio. DivX doesnt dominate to quite the extent mp3 does though, I see a lot of xvid stuff floating around, but maybe they are pretty compatible. Regarding mp4 support from the likes of Apple and Sony, it will be interesting to see what happens. Apple have actually been good about this so far, they could have limited ipod support to .mov containers only, if they wanted to keep tighter control of ipod video creation tools. They havent, theyve allowed normal m4 to work. The fact that only baseline h264 works is likely due to the choice of decoder chip, rather than a deliberate imcompatibility with PSP h264. Sony on the otherhand have either due to sloppyness or deliberate policy, messed with the PSP mp4 container, but it still hasnt stopped people creating 3rd party PSP video encoders. Did you say in the pst that DivX are working on playback in browsers? Compared to Apple's stuff thats where you are lacking most, and also lacking something like itunes and content deals. Im not so sure all those billions of legacy divx avi's will mean all that much to hardware manufacturers in the longterm. When people are buying more video online, it wont be in avi format. Couple that with phones other devices creating mp4's of one kind of another, and next-gen DVD using h264, and I am not so sure DivX compatibility will continue to be such a selling point for DVD hardware players etc in the future. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jim Vinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve, Not to butter you up or anything, but you are very insightful. I honestly appreciate these threads. There are published specs for avi and many other codecs and encoding applications create avi's. For the longterm CE manufacturers will support this format since there are billions of legacy files that the consumers want to play. Supporting our 'certified' profile gives them a competitive advantage, therefore they put it in the box. From my side of the playground, the apple mp4 support is more of a problem than a help. If anyone is going to make a vertically integrated closed system it will be apple. I would be surprised if apple and sony came together with a compatible format out of the kindness of their hearts. The slight differences are not an accident. Recent content deals on both sides drive an even deeper wedge between the psp and ipod. That is where we are trying to be part of the solution. We do have the leverage to make CE manufacturers implement a documented standard that is verifiably interoperable by someone outside of the production process. Also, due to required legacy support, even if we were evil, hand wringing, control freaks, we couldn't lock out the existing, non-DivX (r) encoding schemes. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Jakob Nielson On Talking-Head Videos
On 12/7/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know for a while there people in the usability world were splitbetween being with Nielsen or against him, but I've been out of it for a few years now, so I don't know if that has changed. The feeling hasn't changed much, just aged some. In my day job, I'm very much part of that community. (www.36partners.com and www.ixda.org) Folks have come to accept Nielsen because he brings publicity to the community. But they are divided about his pronouncements. The typical criticism echos Richard Show's. Lack of subtley, questionable assumptions, etc. I know I looked at this article and thought it seemed (typically) bold for data so slim and for an experiment with such narrow parameters. Pundits and gurus... sigh. JS YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Google analytics
was google analytics service pulled down? i cannot find it On 11/25/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adaptive Path demoing Measure Map at BrainJams: http://techalley.cirne.com/index.php/2005/10/12/web-21-a-brainjam-adaptive-path-presentation/ http://tinyurl.com/ac96x ;) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael - Yes, lots of useful uses of AJAX in MeasureMap. For example, you get a neat zoom in map of the world showing your traffic origins, sliders for a calendar range, and where folks have come in from and where they are going. I like the clean UI too. So far, thumbs up! On 11/25/05, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damn, those adaptive path guys are everywhere. I can't keep up on them. Basically it looks like they took your common stats package like AWsats and optimized it for things vloggers might like to know... did they add some AJAX too. :) I signed up I'm going to try it out just for the fun of it. It doesn't say how it works, but I assume it either depends on a silly tracker you place in your pages or hopefully I can just give them the user/pass and url to my server stats. I trust em. :) -Mike On Nov 23, 2005, at 3:23 AM, Ted Tagami wrote: I set my site up the other day, but it looks like Google shut the site down temporarily. I just got an invite to measuremap.com (from adaptivepath.com) and will using it shortly. Is your google analytics site still working? On 11/22/05, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody use google analytics here ? I think it will be a good tool soon I have a shot screen of my vlog stats here : http://www.loiez.org/google_analytics_loiez.jpg Nice day every all Loiez http://www.loiez.org Le 22 nov. 05 à 16:42, Susan a écrit : Even if no one at all read my vlog, my most important audience is four people--two grandparents in Maine, and two grandparents in Texas. They love seeing their grandsugars on a daily basis. Susan SPONSORED LINKS Individualhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=IkmOF87iVVg5aOV5s-5ShQ Fireanthttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=H15DYYUHQoulfARYZSKttA Typepadhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Typepadw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=bK2vbSrJUIzcRadddW7krQ Usehttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=RO46LszR1YSPWsK2mib1pA -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS - Visit your group videoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. -- -- Ted Tagami tagami.com U N I V E R S U S SPONSORED LINKS Individualhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=IkmOF87iVVg5aOV5s-5ShQ Fireanthttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=H15DYYUHQoulfARYZSKttA Typepadhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Typepadw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=bK2vbSrJUIzcRadddW7krQ Usehttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=RO46LszR1YSPWsK2mib1pA -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS - Visit your group videoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. -- SPONSORED LINKS Individualhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=OHeQJKby66gg3t35np-qiw Fireanthttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=hK8TfZa7ClhTIxDJdP6Cbw Usehttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Individualw2=Fireantw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=fljF53rXtnOMjmpIySYbqA -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS - Visit your group videoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. -- -- Ted Tagami tagami.com U N I V E
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
.com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: Corporate hangover if you're that kind of person. This is beginning to sound like the chorus of a song. On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:26:23 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or corporate passover... At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
.com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) And then we clean up the mess with AJAX? (You do have Ajax the household cleanser in the U.S. right?) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Is Flash the answer?
Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug
We actually worked tightly with xvid specifically so that xvid stream would work in all DivX decoders also. Xvid obviously cant license to CE manufacturers because of mpeg-la niceties (mpeg-la is entitled to fees for just compiling the code). Competeing development towards commons goals with xvid has helped us both. We are forced to keep strong development and they are insured of hardware support. (If you look in the code you will see they include DivX certified profiles inside xvid). So for general purposes, there really isnt a functional distinction between xvid and divx. There is a good chance the browser side will come out in a few weeks (I am guessing right after everyone gets back from new years). Another arena is the online distribution. That is still very early in the game. Who is to say that there wont be a lot of paid content in avi? In fact, in italt, there is already a good market of DivX discs sold at retail establishments of current Hollywood releases. In brazil, they are included with new DVD players (sometimes three feature films per disc). And these arent obscure titles. These are new release top tier movies. I know that itunes has sold millions of music videos, but on a sheer number of minutes scale, they are still tens if not hundreds of billions of minutes behind existing (grey or not) avi content. We have already announced lower level content deals (Image Entertainment, very long tail), but dont be surprised if you see some DivX online stores in the next year. Im certainly not saying that we are trailblazers leading the pack, but dont write us off. And please, keep up the dialog. One truly unique position you have with DivX is that we are here and listening. From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Watkins Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:12 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug Cheers :) My impression of things is probably a bit wrong, Im probably underestimating the number of DivX certified players etc that exist. And yes when thinking of videoblogging, Im not thinking of the billions of legacy files that consumers want to play, indeed Im avoiding talking about that stuff at all because its 'grey' to say the least. Still it is similar to how mp3 become the established standard for audio. DivX doesnt dominate to quite the extent mp3 does though, I see a lot of xvid stuff floating around, but maybe they are pretty compatible. Regarding mp4 support from the likes of Apple and Sony, it will be interesting to see what happens. Apple have actually been good about this so far, they could have limited ipod support to .mov containers only, if they wanted to keep tighter control of ipod video creation tools. They havent, theyve allowed normal m4 to work. The fact that only baseline h264 works is likely due to the choice of decoder chip, rather than a deliberate imcompatibility with PSP h264. Sony on the otherhand have either due to sloppyness or deliberate policy, messed with the PSP mp4 container, but it still hasnt stopped people creating 3rd party PSP video encoders. Did you say in the pst that DivX are working on playback in browsers? Compared to Apple's stuff thats where you are lacking most, and also lacking something like itunes and content deals. Im not so sure all those billions of legacy divx avi's will mean all that much to hardware manufacturers in the longterm. When people are buying more video online, it wont be in avi format. Couple that with phones other devices creating mp4's of one kind of another, and next-gen DVD using h264, and I am not so sure DivX compatibility will continue to be such a selling point for DVD hardware players etc in the future. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jim Vinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve, Not to butter you up or anything, but you are very insightful. I honestly appreciate these threads. There are published specs for avi and many other codecs and encoding applications create avi's. For the longterm CE manufacturers will support this format since there are billions of legacy files that the consumers want to play. Supporting our 'certified' profile gives them a competitive advantage, therefore they put it in the box. From my side of the playground, the apple mp4 support is more of a problem than a help. If anyone is going to make a vertically integrated closed system it will be apple. I would be surprised if apple and sony came together with a compatible format out of the kindness of their hearts. The slight differences are not an accident. Recent content deals on both sides drive an even deeper wedge between the psp and ipod. That is where we are trying to be part of the solution. We do have the leverage to make CE manufacturers implement a documented standard that is verifiably interoperable by someone outside of the production process. Also, due to
Re: [videoblogging] Jakob Nielson On Talking-Head Videos
I just became aware of them lately I think that was the first time I got really pissed at Wikipedia and left this list for three months. My leaving has become shorter each time I get pissed at Wikipedia. :-) Regards, Richard Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott
I suppose this, civility of online discourse, is something I feel pretty strongly about (to whatever extent I ever feel strongly about anything)I can tolerate dumb people, fat people, ugly people, geeky people, dirty people, people with different views, kids that climb on rocks; I like to think I am tolerant of most all sorts of things, but I've never been tolerant of rude people - I have a lot of trouble tolerating assholes and, especially, when it's online in an environment when they are not talking to someone face to face - it's too easy I have this sort of core belief (to whatever extent I have any core beliefs) that the way we treat each other is not only important, it's everything. If someone is an asshole to other people, my feeling, is what else matters. Having said that, ironically, I also certainly agree, it's important to learn to ignore rudness to not retaliate in kind ... I read flames in email and long debates where people get personal and rude, and, the best thing to do is to not respond at all - and I don't - though I will admit a disturbing tendency to want to read the long occasional bloddy flaming personal attach threads ... One thing I like about this list, actually, now that I think about it, I like this about the vast majority of people I meet, is that people do make an effort to have civil discourse even when they disagree ... I appreciate that - it's just that the assholes tend to draw the attention, and maybe that sort of explains the behavior ... what am I talking about ... I don't know ... obviously I have some deep underlying disturbing issues, and, maybe had too much coffee and maybe I'm taking the day off from work and I'm finally catching up on yahoo emails and feeling driven to comment and ... I can't stop maybe I'm the real asshole ... oh my God ... exercise my asshold demons! ah! ... Richard, leaving to get another cup of coffee ... On 12/6/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like our boy raymond caught some interesting video at someconfenrce. mena trott from typepad and some audience member discussing how to behanve online.reminds me of some of the discussions we have on this grouop when we disagree. http://dltq.org/media/menavsben.mov (sorrry i found it in the delicious feed so i dont know the permalink). Here you are:http://www.dltq.org/?p=780 ;) jay -- Adventures in Videoblogging URL: http://www.momentshowing.net http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing http://getFireAnt.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...
yes, the joke translates well here Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote: .com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) And then we clean up the mess with AJAX? (You do have Ajax the household cleanser in the U.S. right?) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:40:27 +0100, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a lot of trouble tolerating assholes and, especially, when it's online in an environment when they are not talking to someone face to face - it's too easy Once again it's time to bring out The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory: URL: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19 - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: mena trott
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:40:27 +0100, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a lot of trouble tolerating assholes and, especially, when it's online in an environment when they are not talking to someone face to face - it's too easy Once again it's time to bring out The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory: URL: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19 - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. I don't get it. How does 2/3 = Cats (or is that 2 + 3 = Cats)? ;) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: mena trott
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: oh my God ... exercise my asshold demons! ah! Do you mean exorcise? Or are your assholed demons doing Pilates and Yoga? ;-) ER Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott
I wonder if part of the reason we're mostly fairly polite to each other in here is that we do see each other, in our recorded videos and during live video conferences. I think it's much harder to be an asshole to someone whose face you can actually bring to mind, even if you're not face-to-face with them at the moment. -- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
I've been using Flash all along and never had a complaint about people not being able to view my video. People do complain that they'd like a scrubber/progress bar and other video controls. I've seen Flash videos that have a nice player like that, but so far haven't found one I can use myself - not being a talented Flash type, I just use Sorenson to compress it... -- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
So Deirdr, what process do you use to create your videos? Could you give me some inside on how can I start? You can email me here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would really appreciate any help and info. Thanks guys this message group is awesome --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been using Flash all along and never had a complaint about people not being able to view my video. People do complain that they'd like a scrubber/progress bar and other video controls. I've seen Flash videos that have a nice player like that, but so far haven't found one I can use myself - not being a talented Flash type, I just use Sorenson to compress it... -- best regards, Deirdr� Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] French flashmeeting LOL Now
http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080/fm/flashmeeting.php?pwd=279921-2621 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Learning Annex class: videoblogging!
Hey you guys - Jared from blip.tv and I are going to teach a class on videoblogging this Wednesday evening, December 14th for the Learning Annex. If you know anyone in the New York area who wants to learn how to videoblog...or if you want to help us teach the class...click here or e-mail us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] We'll cover the technical aspects, content, etc...and hopefully set up videoblogs for everyone in the class (assuming wifi is working...) Dina http://www.learningannex.com/default.taf?sctn=B_function=detailcnum=1794NYcat= Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
The approach vsocial.com takes is most logical (as a video hosting service). They transcode uploaded video to flv and the rss feeds hold more portable mp4 formats (and others?). flv works very well as an embedded video on the web and other formats are better suited for downloading and can be used for remixes. On 12/9/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
How easy it is depends on the tools you're using. I'm not much of a website coder, but I post my videos to a website rather than a blog, and I was already using DreamWeaver to manage the site, which naturally handles Flash quite well. Here are the steps: 1. I edit my videos in Roxio VideoWave (sometimes Windows Movie Maker) and save as raw AVI again (the same format they came out of the DV video camera).2. Drag and drop onto Sorenson Squeeze and compress as SWF. Sorenson allows me to play with different settings, e.g. I set higher audio compression when the audio is important, lower video compression if there's not much action, etc.3. Move the resulting SWF file into a videos directory for my website.4. In DreamWeaver, drag the SWF file onto the page where I want it to appear. Set Autoplay on and Loop off (these are standard settings for Flash video in DreamWeaver). 5. Upload the page and the video to my web server.Voila, embedded Flash video on my web page.-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash video player on your server. The very popular free flv player can be found here: http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player if you are on windows, i suggest: http://rivavx.com/index.php?encoderL=3 if you have quicktime pro, you should also provide formats that QT can export to such as mp4 and 3gp. sull On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...
More like the Year of Corporate Handjobs as they wine and dine content creators with visions of advertising and circulation. As Yahoo and Hollywood share offices in Santa Monica and argue over parking spaces and window tables at Spago. Am I jaded? Or just persnickity before coffee? schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://evilvlog.com http://bayarea.node101.org --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
I have Flash MX 2004, so can I import a movie into flash and export it as flv? BUt then, I am using blogger so there is no way I can upload this flv to blip. tv or ourmedia and then make a posting into my blog as I do with a normal mov? Am I been too thick? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash video player on your server. The very popular free flv player can be found here: http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player if you are on windows, i suggest: http://rivavx.com/index.php?encoderL=3 if you have quicktime pro, you should also provide formats that QT can export to such as mp4 and 3gp. sull On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
The problem with Flash and syndication is that most Flash developers architect their stuff so that its meant to be played in a web browser loaded from a specific location, not downloaded to your local machine and played from your hard drive. Flash files are typically filled with relative linked dependencies, whether loading other SWFs, actionscripts, FLV files, or what have you... this is a trick to keep file sizes small from the standpoint of a Flash developer, unfortunately it has the side effect of locking content to one place. In fact, Flash video is not playable by Flash plugin directly unless its loaded separately into a SWF controller. So just by virtue of using Flash video, you are potentially breaking syndication. So, instead of distributing SWFs via RSS that depend on external links that won't function for offline usage, you could instead distribute raw FLV files via RSS... but they are not able to play unless loaded inside a SWF controller. We actually support this in FireAnt on the Mac by using a SWF controller that dynamically loads FLV files from the local hard drive, though not many people distribute FLV via RSS, probably because all of this is kind of a technical pain in the ass. We intend to support this soon in the Windows version of FireAnt as well in anticipation of seeing more FLV content out there, but so far that hasn't really been the case for videoblogs. -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog.
[videoblogging] del.icio.us
Hey all, Noticed that all of us tagging over at del.icio.us are now tagging at a new location :) http://blog.del.icio.us/blog/2005/12/yahoo.html Congrats! cheers r -- URL: http://r.24x7.com Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!From this weekend's NYT:Giving up no creative control, Ms. Congdon and Mr. Baron will get 50 percent of the revenue from ads sold by TiVo to appear before and after their newscast, and their show will gain access to more than 300,000 TV sets connected to those new TiVo boxes.Let the tomato-throwing begin. huge grinOf course, I'm really insanely jealous! Congrats again, guys. And they're not the only ones mentioned - dig this: The best vlogs, like Scratch Video and Minnesota Stories,above, can turn personal narrative about the tedious or mundane into microdocumentaries of wit, beauty and intelligence. A year ago there were fewer than two dozen active vlogs; now there are some 2,000.-- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
Ok, so I get the syndication problem with flash movies, but using a service as Audioblog that problem is solved? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash video player on your server. The very popular free flv player can be found here: http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player if you are on windows, i suggest: http://rivavx.com/index.php?encoderL=3 if you have quicktime pro, you should also provide formats that QT can export to such as mp4 and 3gp. sull On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here: http://ia300843.eu.archive.org/2/items/Shapes_1/shapes.mov )I kind of liked it and found it not too difficult but never put too much attention on it... until now that I am so into vlog. I did some testing embedding a mov into an fla, streaming and linked outside but didn't go farther than that. Anybody has some info about this? Is it flash the answer? Thanks guys. Escorial Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The
Re: [videoblogging] hi guys, how about this meet the vloggers in NY, then?
I think you will definately need space for that many people ... think how many just showed up spontaneously for vloggercue ... RichardOn 12/7/05, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just to be clear...we are still making arrangements for Vloggecon.the challnge is finding an affordable space that will fit 200+ people.it looks like we willneed to charge money for sign up to cover costs. we are shooting for a weekend between late april and early June.do you think that we need space for this many people?jay--Adventures in VideobloggingURL: http://www.momentshowing.nethttp://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowinghttp://getFireAnt.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
I am not certain if you can export to flv from MX2004. But if not, try something that can, such as the riva encoder i pointed you too. I know there are other free flv trancoders too... google around if need be. If you dont have your own web server to hos the flv player, you could use mine until you have a better solution. Use this link and just replace the file url with your own flv url. http://vlogdir.com/flash/flvplayer.swf?file=http://www.netvideo.dreamhosters.com/RichardTitus150805.flv sull On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have Flash MX 2004, so can I import a movie into flash and export it as flv? BUt then, I am using blogger so there is no way I can upload this flv to blip. tv or ourmedia and then make a posting into my blog as I do with a normal mov? Am I been too thick? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash video player on your server. The very popular free flv player can be found here: http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player if you are on windows, i suggest: http://rivavx.com/index.php?encoderL=3 if you have quicktime pro, you should also provide formats that QT can export to such as mp4 and 3gp. sull On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into flash and done some design work to export it again as a QT mov. (see example here: http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/Escorial-SquaredMedia118.mov or here:
[videoblogging] Meet the Vloggers - Tonight in L.A.
Hey All: In case anyone is in the L.A. area and would like to drop by and say hola, there's a Meet the Vloggers tonight at 7pm at The Grove Apple Store. We've been having them on a monthly basis. Apple Store 189 The Grove Drive Los Angeles, CA 90036 323-965-8400 http://www.apple.com/retail/thegrove/ Hope everyone is well... Zadi http://smashface.com/vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...
I think you're being pre-coffee persnickety. Heh. I mean this morning I sorta told a big name sponsor 'no deal' since it wasn't on my terms. I have no problem being wined and dined, btw, but we all knew that. ;-) ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More like the Year of Corporate Handjobs as they wine and dine content creators with visions of advertising and circulation. As Yahoo and Hollywood share offices in Santa Monica and argue over parking spaces and window tables at Spago. Am I jaded? Or just persnickity before coffee? schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://evilvlog.com http://bayarea.node101.org --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:28:52 +0100, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaaaddd it's the big sellout! Woohoo! It's the Adam Curry deal of videoblogging and it sounds like a very good deal to strike. But why'd we read about it in NYT and not on Rocketboom? Is this where I mention that a videoblog on a Tivo is just a really short TV show? Ain't no blog, yo. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
Link to the NYT?On 12/9/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!From this weekend's NYT:Giving up no creative control, Ms. Congdon and Mr. Baron will get 50 percent of the revenue from ads sold by TiVo to appear before and after their newscast, and their show will gain access to more than 300,000 TV sets connected to those new TiVo boxes.Let the tomato-throwing begin. huge grinOf course, I'm really insanely jealous! Congrats again, guys. And they're not the only ones mentioned - dig this: The best vlogs, like Scratch Video and Minnesota Stories,above, can turn personal narrative about the tedious or mundane into microdocumentaries of wit, beauty and intelligence. A year ago there were fewer than two dozen active vlogs; now there are some 2,000.-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...
Apparently, it'll be the Year of the rBoom, and thats fudging sweet. On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're being pre-coffee persnickety. Heh. I mean this morning I sorta told a big name sponsor 'no deal' since it wasn't on my terms. I have no problem being wined and dined, btw, but we all knew that. ;-) ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More like the Year of Corporate Handjobs as they wine and dine content creators with visions of advertising and circulation. As Yahoo and Hollywood share offices in Santa Monica and argue over parking spaces and window tables at Spago. Am I jaded? Or just persnickity before coffee? schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://evilvlog.com http://bayarea.node101.org --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? Year of Corporate takeover? - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] streaming movie staggers with DSL
Hi, I made this at the community media center, then brought it into iMovie and compressed out to MP4, following the freevlog iMovie tutorial. It plays fine on my machine, but in the new google video streaming location where it's hosted, it staggers when viewing online: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=%22Portland+People+and+Places+Interview+with+Charles+Lewis+of+Ethos%2C+INC.%22+playable:true I wonder if there are frame rates or compression settings that I can change to make it flow better? Or if it's the google server. I don't know where else to host the video for streaming. The times go past 30 minutes for some of the music shows we're doing. -d Darren Littlejohn Portland Jazz Jams ...jazz for your community http://portlandjazzjams.com Listen to our podcast: http://podshow.portlandjazzjams.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
Ain't no blog, yo.sure it is well i mean
rocketboom.com is a vlog... so, the content is derived from a vlog... where it ends up doesnt change that fact.it can end up on tivo, video iPod, or a digital satellite theatre...its videoblog derived video content.
that is unless they drop the vlog part and just go direct to tivo... but that doesnt make sense.what it really is is a VODCAST, yo!On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:28:52 +0100, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!
Woohoo! It's the Adam Curry deal of videoblogging and it sounds like a very good deal to strike. But why'd we read about it in NYT and not on Rocketboom? Is this where I mention that a videoblog on a Tivo is just a really short
TV show? Ain't no blog, yo. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator
http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...
You are right Eric. If I had some coffee beforehand, I would have made sure I mentioned that, Corporate or not, I do enjoy a good handjob. I definitely don't shirk away from the intersection of Art and Commerce. Often, that is some of the most entertaining moments in the process of creation. (not entertaining while going on, but usually after the fact. Lots of learning in those moments.) I like field trips to offices and free lunch-- but only after coffee. Of which now I've had a very large cup to the point that I make handjob jokes on large lists. schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://evilvlog.com http://bayarea.node101.org --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're being pre-coffee persnickety. Heh. I mean this morning I sorta told a big name sponsor 'no deal' since it wasn't on my terms. I have no problem being wined and dined, btw, but we all knew that. ;-) ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More like the Year of Corporate Handjobs as they wine and dine content creators with visions of advertising and circulation. As Yahoo and Hollywood share offices in Santa Monica and argue over parking spaces and window tables at Spago. Am I jaded? Or just persnickity before coffee? schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://evilvlog.com http://bayarea.node101.org --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
Michael, I am checking vsocial and it looks quite promissing. Just a couple of questions I could not find answers in their site and maybe you know. Do they copyright the videos under Creative Commons? It seems I can cross-post into my vlog at blogger right? I don't understand very well the proces or better, what kind of file I have to upload to make it flash. Do I have to upload a flv? instead of an mpg4 or mov? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe so, yes... i dont use audioblog but i think they provide other formats for syndication. Regardless, as mentioned earlier, vsocial.com definately does do this. Try them out. Recommended!!! On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I get the syndication problem with flash movies, but using a service as Audioblog that problem is solved? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash video player on your server. The very popular free flv player can be found here: http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player if you are on windows, i suggest: http://rivavx.com/index.php?encoderL=3 if you have quicktime pro, you should also provide formats that QT can export to such as mp4 and 3gp. sull On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones most of us out there are average users, we get scared when we hear simple things like mp4 and mov and we don't know the differences if any... and we really don't want to know. We just want to have an easy way to deliver our videos and make sure they will be able to be watched by the mayority of people. I am trying to play devil's advocate here, so could you tell me the problem with flash video and syndication? sorry if I am being a pain. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. I do think its a great solution for service providers who develop hosted applications (like audioblog). However, I think its important for those service providers to also encode other more portable formats for syndication... that is if social media is one of their goals as a service provider. But back to the casual user... this is the best solution I've seen yet for an individual videoblogger who wants to use Flash video, but doesn't want to rely on a hosted service like audioblog, or videoegg, or another like that: http://roel.meurders.nl/wordpress-plugins/wp-flv-video-player-plugin/ (requires Wordpress) -Josh On 12/9/05, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible solution. ER ericrice.com audioblog.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, escorial1967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used could be the one of the answer to the problem. I am a web designer and I've been working with Flash since versiion 2.0. The version I am using now is MX 2004 and I have done some video embeding in my movies to test how they would work. I have imported mov into
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Google analytics
http://www.google.com/analytics/ was google analytics service pulled down? i cannot find it --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com --- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:27:46 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ain't no blog, yo. sure it is well i mean rocketboom.com is a vlog... so, the content is derived from a vlog... where it ends up doesnt change that fact. Yes, it does. The video isn't the blog entry. Inbound links, outbound link, comments and so on all make up the blog entry. The blog entry is a network object. What you get on the Tivo is just the video. Same thing if you print out a blog entry and put it in a newspaper. You wouldn't have a blog entry anymore, you'd have an opinion article (or an article or whatever). what it really is is a VODCAST, yo! Yes, not the same thing as a videoblog. :o) - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
so then, what you mean to wsay is, each video... when watched on the tivo, is not a videoblog post. fine, we can all live with that for awhile... until tivo get bloggy with it. akimbo might already? just to be clear though, lets not say that rboom is no longer a videoblog... we'll agree that the daily video 'if' viewed on the tivo is not a vlog post... and thats about it =)On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:27:46 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ain't no blog, yo. sure it is well i mean rocketboom.com is a vlog... so, the content is derived from a vlog... where it ends up doesnt change that fact.Yes, it does. The video isn't the blog entry. Inbound links, outboundlink, comments and so on all make up the blog entry. The blog entry is a network object. What you get on the Tivo is just the video. Same thing ifyou print out a blog entry and put it in a newspaper. You wouldn't have ablog entry anymore, you'd have an opinion article (or an article or whatever). what it really is is a VODCAST, yo!Yes, not the same thing as a videoblog. :o)- Andreas--URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
Background info below: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? Macromedia Flash Player 6 and above include the Sorenson Sparc video codec, and Macromedia Flash Player 8 also includes the On2 VP6 video codec. (Audio codecs include MP3, Nelly-Moser for speech, one or two others... audio decompression has been pretty stable the last few versions.) Pretty much anyone on the web has FP6 or above... FP8 has seen massive, massive installaiton rates, already above Firefox or Windows XP SP2, although there hasn't been time for consumer audits of SWF8 viewability yet. People do complain that they'd like a scrubber/progress bar and other video controls. The webs search term flv skins pulls up a bunch of such controls (no coding necessary)... the term flv player pulls up an overlapping set of sites with such resources. what process do you use to create your videos? Could you give me some inside on how can I start? Here's a Flash Video Learning Guide and many, many more resources: http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/flash/video.html Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. Not easy to learn a general authoring tool, true, but lots and lots of newbies post web video these days with ease: http://www.videoegg.com/ For the title's Is Flash the answer?, I'm actually not real sure of the question, sorry, hard for me to usefully reply on that one yet ;-) jd -- John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
heh, can one make rocketboom a v/blog again by, after watching an episode on tivo, then comment on rocketbooms site or ones own site? rocketboom reborn On Dec 9, 2005, at 4:52 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote: so then, what you mean to wsay is, each video... when watched on the tivo, is not a videoblog post. fine, we can all live with that for awhile... until tivo get bloggy with it. akimbo might already? just to be clear though, lets not say that rboom is no longer a videoblog... we'll agree that the daily video 'if' viewed on the tivo is not a vlog post... and thats about it =) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:27:46 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ain't no blog, yo. > > sure it is well i mean rocketboom.com is a vlog... > so, the content is derived from a vlog... > where it ends up doesnt change that fact. Yes, it does. The video isn't the blog entry. Inbound links, outbound link, comments and so on all make up the blog entry. The blog entry is a network object. What you get on the Tivo is just the video. Same thing if you print out a blog entry and put it in a newspaper. You wouldn't have a blog entry anymore, you'd have an opinion article (or an article or whatever). > what it really is is a VODCAST, yo! Yes, not the same thing as a videoblog. :o) - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~-> Yahoo! Groups Links *> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ *> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS ▪ Visit your group videoblogging on the web. ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?
jd, you rock man I am checking it right now. So much info --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Dowdell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Background info below: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? Macromedia Flash Player 6 and above include the Sorenson Sparc video codec, and Macromedia Flash Player 8 also includes the On2 VP6 video codec. (Audio codecs include MP3, Nelly-Moser for speech, one or two others... audio decompression has been pretty stable the last few versions.) Pretty much anyone on the web has FP6 or above... FP8 has seen massive, massive installaiton rates, already above Firefox or Windows XP SP2, although there hasn't been time for consumer audits of SWF8 viewability yet. People do complain that they'd like a scrubber/progress bar and other video controls. The webs search term flv skins pulls up a bunch of such controls (no coding necessary)... the term flv player pulls up an overlapping set of sites with such resources. what process do you use to create your videos? Could you give me some inside on how can I start? Here's a Flash Video Learning Guide and many, many more resources: http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/flash/video.html Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user who has no experience. Not easy to learn a general authoring tool, true, but lots and lots of newbies post web video these days with ease: http://www.videoegg.com/ For the title's Is Flash the answer?, I'm actually not real sure of the question, sorry, hard for me to usefully reply on that one yet ;-) jd -- John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
