Re: [videoblogging] Re: NYC December food, drinks, mirth
Aye. J On 12/6/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.bullemhead.com/seasonal/art-bar-on-the-15th.html What: Drinks and food (menu http://www.merchantsny.com/art/art_menu.php) When: 7:00pm, Friday, December 15th Where: Art Bar - Map http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52+Eighth+Ave+Ny,+10014- Subway directions http://www.hopstop.com/map?zip=10014address=52+8TH+AVEnearby=s Who: You and me and some other people Why: Because I like the Art Bar and haven't been in a while, because I haven't seen a lot of the people that are going to show up in a long time, and because MissB http://missbhavens.blogspot.com/ has the night off. See you there, AQ PS. Also note that Andrew is having a meetup on the 12th: http://videoblog.meetup.com/8/calendar/5270367/ I'm going to that one too. On 12/6/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] bullemhead%40gmail.com wrote: So, raise your hand if you can meet up December 15 in NYC. So far me and MissB are coming, and that's probably enough to have a good time, but the more the merrier. AQ On 12/6/06, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com wrote: FYI, ThePAN screening info at Pioneer Theatre this Sunday. http://www.tix.com/Event.asp?Event=79336 I want videos and footage, and DVD, and a packed house. All you NY vloggers better show up. You don't want to make me come to NY! -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com wrote: Wish I could come. As always. Just felt you needed my moral support. ... for validation. ;) LOL And congrats on the pioneer theatre screening. Heh! If you have a graphic please send it over to us. I know it's coming up fast, but I tink it's something we should be promoting on the meef. LOL... the meef, that's Mefeedia. Sorry... someone called it that and now it's stuck in my head. It's hilarious. Send us a grpahic, mefeedia needs to promote more cool things like theatre screenings and vlog events, we've been a little remis. Speaking of which, did everyone see the AskANinja DVD is out!? http://askaninja.com/dvd Someone needs to pimp this stuff. :) Peace, -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 12/6/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED]missbhavens1969%40yahoo.com missbhavens1969%40yahoo.com wrote: where do I sign? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's do something then. I'll try to get a few people together. I'm sure Jan and Dan Liss and the Blip kids would come. I'll email everyone later today after I'm done working. AQ On 12/4/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AR!!! Bummer. I had the 15th off. Not so on the 12th. Catch y'all in January. Or maybe February or March. :( Bekah --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk bullemhead@ wrote: http://videoblog.meetup.com/8/calendar/5270367/ This ^ meetup is already being organized, so I'm gonna hit that up instead of starting a new one. See you there, AQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Help Me Choose A New Camera
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Easy Panasonic a href=http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=413451is=REGaddedTroughType=search/HVX-200 w/ two P2/a --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz schlomo@ wrote: Hey all I get to buy a new videocamera for some work and wondered what people recommend. I get to purchase one of those snazzy HD type cameras. Don't tell me to get some tiny Xacti, I'm looking for something that will look good on the telly. As the boss says, Tell me what to buy and I'll bring the AMEX card. Yippie!! It's Christmas for Schlomo!! So yes, tell me what you use/like. I know I'm going to blow at least a couple thousand dollars, so lets play Gear Porn and show me something to drool over. Thanks! Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com OOOSSS this is what I was thinking of- a href=http://www.digideep.com/english/digital/video/camcorder/Sony/DCR-TRV8/34/1840/;TRV-8/a Sorry I remember you saying this was a favorite of yours! Aloha! Smithie Boho a href=http://320x240.blogspot.com/;320x240/aCheap and easy!@
[videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro
Wouldn't know not using it? You like? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nathan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using the TotalStats Pro feature Feedburner offers??? If so, how do you like it??? Nathan Miller www.bicycle-sidewalk.com Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
Re: [videoblogging] Training Series 'n stuff...
Will check out your vids later today, but wanted to ask if you'd be interested in talking with other trainers? My Dad's a shepherd who's been working with border collies for 40 years. It might be cool (eventually) to have some footage of other doggie types to push traffic your way. Warmly, Jan On 12/5/06, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's been a long time since i've posted here, and I promise, no politics. :-) Training Series We have wanted to create a for profit DVD on discdog training for some time. I am wondering what you all think about the internet delivered video alternatives to that. Up 'til now, we have been nibbling around the edges, trying to give people enough to pique their interest and give them some skills, but holding back the serious knowledge and thoughtful production. Any comments about how to deliver video training for profit, conceptually, in this medium would be greatly appreciated. I think it can be done, but don't have the knowledge nor the time to ensure quality and/or efficiency. Dog training's my business and we're pretty good. I wouldn't want to screw that up. You Tube I am experimenting with You Tube, as their numbers seem to be better - more views. I really don't like it too much, as I think the quality is crap and I don't like the branded player. I'll take blip any day. Like some of the responses already, I want to try to use it to drive people to my other sites. Drupal Does anyone work on Drupal? How does it handle video? Has it gotten any more user friendly, or is it still a pro-sumer kind of CMS? I've worked on it from an admin standpoint before (2 years ago) and it just seemed a bit too techy. Is there GUI admin? I guess I could just install a copy again, but I figured I would ask you all and get all the answers at once. Mahalos I also wanted to thank you all for keeping me posted on what's up. I buried the list into a special folder that I never check any more on my machine. I've been working on my girlfriends iBook and totally realized what I had been missing. Posting all kinds of vids these days. Thanks for the conversation, information and swift kick in the ass in terms of motivation; it's great feeding off your passion. Thanks for all your geekly wisdom. Cheers, Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://pawsitivevybe.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] How To Shoot a Network TV Pilot With the Panasonic HVX-200
How To Shoot a Network TV Pilot With the Panasonic HVX-200 http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/tv_pilot_hvx_200_brockett.html or http://tinyurl.com/ya5b7m P2 Is A Better Workflow With my brief experience with this sort of workflow and P2 media, I am sold. I really enjoy working in this way with the instant non- linear access and not having to capture tape. I think that this sort of workflow, whether it's with P2 or some sort of newer, as of yet unthought-of media, it is the best way to streamline the production process. I am currently planning on going into production on my own pilot using basically a similar workflow. I know that the end results will look and sound amazing. -- Steve Garfield http://SteveGarfield.com
Re: [videoblogging] How To Shoot a Network TV Pilot With the Panasonic HVX-200
Amazing article... thanks for sharing Nathan Miller www.bicycle-sidewalk.com --- Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How To Shoot a Network TV Pilot With the Panasonic HVX-200 http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/tv_pilot_hvx_200_brockett.html or http://tinyurl.com/ya5b7m P2 Is A Better Workflow With my brief experience with this sort of workflow and P2 media, I am sold. I really enjoy working in this way with the instant non- linear access and not having to capture tape. I think that this sort of workflow, whether it's with P2 or some sort of newer, as of yet unthought-of media, it is the best way to streamline the production process. I am currently planning on going into production on my own pilot using basically a similar workflow. I know that the end results will look and sound amazing. -- Steve Garfield http://SteveGarfield.com Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro
Nathan, I use it. It gives me downloads and views for specified time periods. I think it only tracks the time you have been subscribed. About $5 a month and I consider it more of a donation. I'll send you more info when I get home from work. bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wouldn't know not using it? You like? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nathan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using the TotalStats Pro feature Feedburner offers??? If so, how do you like it??? Nathan Miller www.bicycle-sidewalk.com __ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com http://www.jchtv.com/ A Philadelphia based vlog about Craic, Travel and Sailing the Chesapeake Bay! - Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: How To Shoot a Network TV Pilot With the Panasonic HVX-200
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How To Shoot a Network TV Pilot With the Panasonic HVX-200 http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/tv_pilot_hvx_200_brockett.html or http://tinyurl.com/ya5b7m P2 Is A Better Workflow With my brief experience with this sort of workflow and P2 media, I am sold. I really enjoy working in this way with the instant non- linear access and not having to capture tape. I think that this sort of workflow, whether it's with P2 or some sort of newer, as of yet unthought-of media, it is the best way to streamline the production process. I am currently planning on going into production on my own pilot using basically a similar workflow. I know that the end results will look and sound amazing. -- Steve Garfield http://SteveGarfield.com That's a very well done and informative article. The new MacBook Pros don't support P2 cards, although you can buy an external adapter to connect them via USB. The older ones have the correct slot for this application. That particular shoot required a lot of movement and simultaneous cameras rolling, so it should have been called How to shoot a network TV pilot with SEVERAL HVX-200s. If it had been a one-camera shoot without much movement, 2. Shoot Directly To Laptop would have been the way to go: An alternative to shooting to P2 cards is to shoot directly into a computer. Several programs on both PCs and Macs support live capture to HD. Pluses - Shooting times are only limited by the hard drive capacity you have connected to your computer. You can also use your laptop's display as a sort of lower end monitoring system as you shoot and capture. Minuses - Size, weight and hassle. Basically, shooting to a laptop ties the HVX-200 to the computer via a Firewire cable. Extra hassle in lugging, setting up and breaking down a laptop, cables and drives. Reliability is questionable, computers lock-up and crash, P2 cards don't. No time code is recorded to each individual clip so all clips with begin at 00:00:00:00 time code. Shooting handheld or Steadicam while tethered to a laptop is difficult to impossible. Laptop capture does not support native frame rates so storage capacities per GB are lower and variable frame rates are not possible. Also, the reason they needed to shoot this in HD is that they were working with people that already had their deal set up: The project was to be produced for the studio in conjunction with a huge production company owned by an A-list feature film director who you have definitely heard of. That's all I can tell you. It was definitely big league stuff. The producer for the project and director/writer were already attached as they had a development deal with the studio although they had more feature film experience than television experience. Under normal circumstances, the point of a pilot is the content, and it's used to shop the IDEA of the piece, not the look of the piece. This is because A) they're normally done by production companies that don't have the extensive connections available to the writer of this article, and they aren't trying to spend a lot of money taking this shot in the dark of trying to sell this idea, and B) once they sell it, they're not going to be responsible for shooting it anyway, so there's no need to demonstrate their technical capabilities. Well-lit DVcam or even MiniDV is all you need to get your point across making a pilot. If you don't have to run around a lot for the shoot, record straight to your laptop... the only downside being, as they mentioned, that you will have the same timecode on every clip... which doesn't matter, because they'll all have separate clip names, and you can modify the timecode in FCP anyway. HDV is popular now also. As far as videoblogging's concerned, the Nokia N93 apparently shoots 640 x 480 resolution and 30 frames a second. MiniDV = 720 x 480 resolution and 29.97 frames a second. For that, just get a camera-phone and several mini-SD cards and make sure you shoot outside in the sunlight and go shop your demo. :D __ Bill C. http://ReelSolid.TV
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro
We are using it at GoodnightBurbank.com - and it is alright. As a code-cutter, I am frustrated with the resulting XML from the feeds - but can survive. As for total stats - it is okay, but I did appreciate podtrac stats until we started having redirect problems. Sanford --- Sanford Dickert Rawlings Atlantic Inc (954) 323 4450 Sent from my treo 650 -Original Message- From: bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro Date: Thu Dec 7, 2006 5:49 am Size: 1K To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Wouldn't know not using it? You like? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nathan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using the TotalStats Pro feature Feedburner offers??? If so, how do you like it??? Nathan Miller www.bicycle-sidewalk.com Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
An interesting article from the online viewer perspective http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/editorial/16154786.htm So that's why no one is watchingI'm not consistant or compellingand here I thought it was because I had hacked some people off..I'm compelling, really I am Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
[videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
I feel like some of the trends that have made new media appealing thusfar, particularly the sort of monitor as mirror effect I talked about in my response to Fred Graver http://focus.blip.tv/file/86145 where people can see themselves in the show might be hard for legacy media to embrace. OTOH, when you're making a play for the masses, how much does street cred or lack thereof in a very fringey industry matter? If we draw another parallel to film, one wonders...are we going to have fewer and fewer truly independent productions and see more Warner Independent style Internet TV programs? I realize that the studio system is good at funneling resources to and promoting talented people, but I think there's a real case for the amateurs here due to: A) sheer numbers that have not been duplicated before in any of the previous revolutions they describe B) the continuing death of distance that continues to grow niche markets. Thanks for posting this, I have been wondering in my head for a little while, What happens when what we're calling today 'New Media' isn't really new anymore? At the moment, places like Network2 http://network2.tv/ aren't carrying much that doesn't come from people outside a studio, but we will see how the pendulum swings. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Help Me Choose A New Camera
Thanks everyone for the suggestions!!! I'm going to a couple stores and try all these bad boys and girls out (are cameras boys or girls?). I'll let you know what I pick out. Thanks for the great videoblogging resource list!! Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com On 12/7/06, bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Easy Panasonic a href=http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=413451is=REGaddedTroughType=search/HVX-200 w/ two P2/a --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz schlomo@ wrote: Hey all I get to buy a new videocamera for some work and wondered what people recommend. I get to purchase one of those snazzy HD type cameras. Don't tell me to get some tiny Xacti, I'm looking for something that will look good on the telly. As the boss says, Tell me what to buy and I'll bring the AMEX card. Yippie!! It's Christmas for Schlomo!! So yes, tell me what you use/like. I know I'm going to blow at least a couple thousand dollars, so lets play Gear Porn and show me something to drool over. Thanks! Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com OOOSSS this is what I was thinking of- a href=http://www.digideep.com/english/digital/video/camcorder/Sony/DCR-TRV8/34/1840/;TRV-8/a Sorry I remember you saying this was a favorite of yours! Aloha! Smithie Boho a href=http://320x240.blogspot.com/;320x240/aCheap and easy!@
[videoblogging] Re: Help Me Choose A New Camera
Cameras are definitely of the female persuasion. David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks everyone for the suggestions!!! I'm going to a couple stores and try all these bad boys and girls out (are cameras boys or girls?). I'll let you know what I pick out. Thanks for the great videoblogging resource list!! Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com On 12/7/06, bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, bofoboho bofoboho@ wrote: Easy Panasonic a href=http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=413451is=REGaddedTroughType=search/HVX-200 w/ two P2/a --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz schlomo@ wrote: Hey all I get to buy a new videocamera for some work and wondered what people recommend. I get to purchase one of those snazzy HD type cameras. Don't tell me to get some tiny Xacti, I'm looking for something that will look good on the telly. As the boss says, Tell me what to buy and I'll bring the AMEX card. Yippie!! It's Christmas for Schlomo!! So yes, tell me what you use/like. I know I'm going to blow at least a couple thousand dollars, so lets play Gear Porn and show me something to drool over. Thanks! Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com OOOSSS this is what I was thinking of- a href=http://www.digideep.com/english/digital/video/camcorder/Sony/DCR-TRV8/34/1840/;TRV-8/a Sorry I remember you saying this was a favorite of yours! Aloha! Smithie Boho a href=http://320x240.blogspot.com/;320x240/aCheap and easy!@
Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM
I was a little disappointed to find the dreamhost encoder does not accept mp4 joly sull wrote: Dreamhost now offers flv transcoding and flash viewers/tools. It's not all the difference... and so far you cant do batch transcodings... but maybe soon you can. --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com ---
RE: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
This may be a weird parallel to make, but here it is anyway. My father is a great fan of the history of the Church and the Middle Ages. That is to say he reads everything he can on the subject. What follows is mostly my understanding of history that's been funneled to me mostly second-hand through my father. So I may not be exactly correct on all points, but I believe the broad strokes to be accurate. If you're more knowledgeable on these subjects than I am please step in and correct me. During the Middle Ages literacy itself, and writing in particular, was essentially an ecclesiastical monopoly. This is to say that only men of the cloth knew how to read and write. This is why the great works of this age were generally written by scribes who also happened to be members of holy orders. This monopoly was in place for a number of reasons, but perhaps the most interesting is that it suited the status quo and the powers that were at the time -- the Church. Not to put too fine a point on it, but this monopoly allowed the Church to tell peasants that the Bible said just about anything that suited them. There was no way to verify their accounts. You can find parallels in the American south of 150 years ago, I suppose. Anyway, back to the point: At some point reading and writing -- literacy, broadly defined -- was democratized. Gutenberg invented the printing press. So on and so forth. As an observer at that time you could have taken the view that a major revolution (reformation?) was under way and that the world of letters would never be the same. You could have observed these developments and believed that the masses would read and write, that one day anyone could write a book and get published, that the Church and the royals would no longer have a monopoly on information. On the other hand, it would have been perfectly reasonable for an observer at that time to take the view that the masses would never take to letters the way the clergy had. It would have been perfectly reasonable to assume that the ecclesiastical monopoly -- backed up such as it was by everything from the power of the State to the incredibly moneyed and all-powerful Church -- would manage to keep its stranglehold on information. You would be forgiven for believing that the invention of the printing press would lead only to dramatic downsizing at the various monasteries that employed legions of monkish scribes. We all know where this story actually ends up. My particular favorite ending for the story is Thomas Paine's Common Sense (which I wrote about on the Fourth of July at http://blog.blip.tv/blog/2006/07/04/happy-independence-day/). I don't believe that Warner Independent will dominate this new medium. I believe that the general trend of history is clear, and that as access to the means of production expands that independent voices (within an ever-broadening base) overwhelmingly succeed. Remember that once upon a time the great publishing houses of Europe were independent voices themselves insomuch as they were not of the previously lettered establishment. Idealistically yours, Mike blip.tv -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of khyrosfinalcut Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:03 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media I feel like some of the trends that have made new media appealing thusfar, particularly the sort of monitor as mirror effect I talked about in my response to Fred Graver http://focus.blip.tv/file/86145 where people can see themselves in the show might be hard for legacy media to embrace. OTOH, when you're making a play for the masses, how much does street cred or lack thereof in a very fringey industry matter? If we draw another parallel to film, one wonders...are we going to have fewer and fewer truly independent productions and see more Warner Independent style Internet TV programs? I realize that the studio system is good at funneling resources to and promoting talented people, but I think there's a real case for the amateurs here due to: A) sheer numbers that have not been duplicated before in any of the previous revolutions they describe B) the continuing death of distance that continues to grow niche markets. Thanks for posting this, I have been wondering in my head for a little while, What happens when what we're calling today 'New Media' isn't really new anymore? At the moment, places like Network2 http://network2.tv/ aren't carrying much that doesn't come from people outside a studio, but we will see how the pendulum swings. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution medium. David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
RE: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM
I'm sure they're using ffmpeg, which is good, free and open source but has a significant disadvantage in terms of the latest codecs. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WWWhatsup Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:34 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM I was a little disappointed to find the dreamhost encoder does not accept mp4 joly sull wrote: Dreamhost now offers flv transcoding and flash viewers/tools. It's not all the difference... and so far you cant do batch transcodings... but maybe soon you can. --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com --- Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Windows Server and .mp4
Can anyone help this guy who emailed me? I am running windows server 2003 and I cant get it to read the .mp4 extention. Do you know how to enable it? Here is the error I get... HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found. Internet Information Services (IIS) I've never worked with a windows server before. Thanks, Verdi -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM
If Dreamhost licenses the On2 FLV encoder, then they'll have the same stuff used by just about every video upload portal on the web today. This can convert just about any format to FLV. -josh On 12/7/06, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure they're using ffmpeg, which is good, free and open source but has a significant disadvantage in terms of the latest codecs. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WWWhatsup Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:34 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM I was a little disappointed to find the dreamhost encoder does not accept mp4 joly sull wrote: Dreamhost now offers flv transcoding and flash viewers/tools. It's not all the difference... and so far you cant do batch transcodings... but maybe soon you can. --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com --- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Windows Server and .mp4
Here's what I found with a quick Google search... I've never dealt with IIS either: http://www.inventua.com/forums.content?forumid=1postid=168view=topic - You can fix this by adding a MIME type for mp4 in the IIS manager. To do this: 1. Open IIS Manager 2. Find your virtual directory/web site, right click, select Properties 3. Click the HTTP Headers tab. In the tab, click the MIME Types button down the bottom. 4. Click New. Enter extension .mp4, MIME type video/mp4. Click OK. - On 12/7/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone help this guy who emailed me? I am running windows server 2003 and I cant get it to read the .mp4 extention. Do you know how to enable it? Here is the error I get... HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found. Internet Information Services (IIS) I've never worked with a windows server before. Thanks, Verdi -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro
Hey there Sanford. Is there something we can do to improve the XML that comes out? Please let us know ... we're constantly incorporating suggestions from feed publishers and consumers. Eric Lunt CTO, FeedBurner --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using it at GoodnightBurbank.com - and it is alright. As a code-cutter, I am frustrated with the resulting XML from the feeds - but can survive. As for total stats - it is okay, but I did appreciate podtrac stats until we started having redirect problems. Sanford --- Sanford Dickert Rawlings Atlantic Inc (954) 323 4450 Sent from my treo 650 -Original Message- From: bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro Date: Thu Dec 7, 2006 5:49 am Size: 1K To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Wouldn't know not using it? You like? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nathan Miller cmynewshoes@ wrote: Is anyone using the TotalStats Pro feature Feedburner offers??? If so, how do you like it??? Nathan Miller www.bicycle-sidewalk.com Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links
RE: [videoblogging] Windows Server and .mp4
IIS has a weird feature (really, it's a feature!) where it won't serve up files when it doesn't recognize their MIME type, and pretends that it's because it can't find them. More information (and a solution) here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326965 -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Verdi Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:55 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Windows Server and .mp4 Can anyone help this guy who emailed me? I am running windows server 2003 and I cant get it to read the .mp4 extention. Do you know how to enable it? Here is the error I get... HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found. Internet Information Services (IIS) I've never worked with a windows server before. Thanks, Verdi -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Windows Server and .mp4
Oh cool. So this sounds basically like adding a mime type to a .htaccess file on a linux server? Thanks Josh. -Verdi On 12/7/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's what I found with a quick Google search... I've never dealt with IIS either: http://www.inventua.com/forums.content?forumid=1postid=168view=topic - You can fix this by adding a MIME type for mp4 in the IIS manager. To do this: 1. Open IIS Manager 2. Find your virtual directory/web site, right click, select Properties 3. Click the HTTP Headers tab. In the tab, click the MIME Types button down the bottom. 4. Click New. Enter extension .mp4, MIME type video/mp4. Click OK. - On 12/7/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]michael%40michaelverdi.com wrote: Can anyone help this guy who emailed me? I am running windows server 2003 and I cant get it to read the .mp4 extention. Do you know how to enable it? Here is the error I get... HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found. Internet Information Services (IIS) I've never worked with a windows server before. Thanks, Verdi -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM
Well, basically, sure. But On2 is expensive and doesn't do everything itself. It also doesn't provide super-wide compatibility. MPEG-2, for example, is unsupported iirc. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:58 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM If Dreamhost licenses the On2 FLV encoder, then they'll have the same stuff used by just about every video upload portal on the web today. This can convert just about any format to FLV. -josh On 12/7/06, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure they're using ffmpeg, which is good, free and open source but has a significant disadvantage in terms of the latest codecs. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WWWhatsup Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:34 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM I was a little disappointed to find the dreamhost encoder does not accept mp4 joly sull wrote: Dreamhost now offers flv transcoding and flash viewers/tools. It's not all the difference... and so far you cant do batch transcodings... but maybe soon you can. --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com --- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: The new guy with WAY too many vlog-related domain names.
Haha Ha Ha! I trumped you all. I just regestered vlogsex .com .net and .org and pornvlogs and vlogporn and free vlog sex and free video blog sex and every one of the 20, derivative of vlog an sex and cash and free I could. Your domains are now worthlist. I'm going to be the king of vlog porn and get rich quick vlogging! Domain name hoarding, and it is hoarding, much as I don't want to be mean... is very, very much a pointless endevor. It would not even be worth an individuals time and trouble to go about cordinating the transfer of ownership of these domains, when they can just go to godaddy or someplace and in to seconds regester a domain for $7. And people wonder why all the web2.0 sites have domain names like odeo, and flickr, and mefeedia, and zoomr, and on and on and on. The namespace and domain space (.net, .com, etc) is pretty much infinite. When you domain name hoard it's a technique in finincial terms cald hedging, like hedge funds or hedging with options... With domain names you're litterally hedging your bets against an the infinte pool, that's growing more infinite everyday. I can't say this across the board is a bad idea... because there were some good domain names, but generally speaking it's an increasingly loosing value proposition. Early domain name traders made money because they bought up names like Eddiebauer and coke and cocacola... and most of them got sued anyway... those gold rush days of picking a wining horse in this space are done. Because there's litterally an infinite amount of horses and the past winners are all off the market. Welcome to vloglandia. -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 12/5/06, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok Dan, I finally looked at your site and I am very interested in the following addys. Your list inspired me to make that leap into the fray, construct some shows and fulfill my artistic potential while making a living. I hope I'm offering enough, but if not, we can make some sort of deal in profit-sharing. Believe me when I say this: This is easy money in the bag. You see that bag? ITS FULL OF MONEY PICK IT UP. For $40 each: PLASTICSURGERYVLOGS.COM - I've seen that Doctor 90210 (have you seen it: http://www.eonline.com/on/shows/dr90210/), and I think something that really delves into the heart of pastic surgery will revolutionize this new medium. It's a belly chockfull of dough and I'm going to give it a tummytuck and suck out all the loot. VLOGGINGFORCASH.COM - this is the moneymaker. It can go in so many ways my head feels like its spinning. It's a gameshow; it's a tutorial; its Tony Robbins for Web2.0. I can't believe someone hasn't picked it up yet. VOYEURVLOGS.COM - I can't believe you haven't gotten rid of this yet. I have enough footage to fill this site up but full. Seriously. MONEY. Here. In this site. I can make a network of Vloggers that will produce the content for this without breaking a sweat. Everyone likes the Gonzo style of voyeurism, and this ties with many of the people who post videoblogs. Let me know where we go from here. These are the domains I've been waiting for to make that big leap into full-featured Internet Television. thanks Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM
On2 is definately the standard right now for providing Sufficient flv transcoding needs. Since Dreamhost is obviously tinkering with ideas and giving their customers some basic tools like this I would not be surprised if they added On2 as part of a more robust solution and start marketing it accordingly. They have now been dabbling in ways to archive your media forever, sell your media, share your media and now transcode and display your media. Maybe they build a wordpress plugin that gets included with the one-click install process which binds that publishing platform with their own hosted services to make it easy to publish media... to vlog and podcast etc. Feasible. A turn-key solution on top of their existing hosting platform would only take some focus and could become quite popular... Sull On 12/7/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If Dreamhost licenses the On2 FLV encoder, then they'll have the same stuff used by just about every video upload portal on the web today. This can convert just about any format to FLV. -josh On 12/7/06, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] mike%40blip.tv wrote: I'm sure they're using ffmpeg, which is good, free and open source but has a significant disadvantage in terms of the latest codecs. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of WWWhatsup Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:34 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM I was a little disappointed to find the dreamhost encoder does not accept mp4 joly sull wrote: Dreamhost now offers flv transcoding and flash viewers/tools. It's not all the difference... and so far you cant do batch transcodings... but maybe soon you can. -- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com -- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Video Blog on Days of Our Lives
Hey everyone, I was just working on my laptop while watching Days of Our Lives (guilty pleasure) and they mentioned that Chelsea (Bo and Billie's daughter) has a Video Blog. The episode aired today from 1-2pm EST, if anyone on the west coast can record it when it airs over there, please do. I think others would get a kick out of it... Best, Casey --- Casey McKinnon Executive Producer, Galacticast http://www.galacticast.com/
RE: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
At the end of the day it's about what you want to talk about and how many people you want to reach, no? -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heath Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:30 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Tames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution medium. David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096 Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM
It's a nice step from Dreamhost ! Whithin a few years, every serious hosting service will have a media transcoding service included. ffmpeg is quite robust and since this summer the flv support is quite good, you can install it easily on your own dreamhost account also http://www.catmindeye.com/media/2006/07/installing_ffmpeg_on_dreamhost.html! With some tweaks, it support mp4 files. I have a test server (with a ffmpeg converting tool) running on a Crazy Domain plan. And it works quite well : http://dev.podesk.com/guest.php/ Bertrand 2006/12/7, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, basically, sure. But On2 is expensive and doesn't do everything itself. It also doesn't provide super-wide compatibility. MPEG-2, for example, is unsupported iirc. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:58 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM If Dreamhost licenses the On2 FLV encoder, then they'll have the same stuff used by just about every video upload portal on the web today. This can convert just about any format to FLV. -josh On 12/7/06, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] mike%40blip.tv wrote: I'm sure they're using ffmpeg, which is good, free and open source but has a significant disadvantage in terms of the latest codecs. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of WWWhatsup Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:34 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MEDIA.DREAMHOST.COM I was a little disappointed to find the dreamhost encoder does not accept mp4 joly sull wrote: Dreamhost now offers flv transcoding and flash viewers/tools. It's not all the difference... and so far you cant do batch transcodings... but maybe soon you can. -- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com -- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://www.bertrandgondouin.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro
Eric - Couple of thoughts (and immediate mea culpa if I have not read the docs yet): 1. Better human-readable format: take a gander at my hand-hewn version: http://www.rawlingsatlantic.com/yi-tan/podcast.xml I attempted to make it as clear as possible for others to read and follow - not that your does not, but last I looked under the hood, there was an assortment of content and formatting that could be made more understandable. For us who like going under the hood - you scare me...a little. 2. Media RSS - I am using blogger for GNB - and I want to support both flash, QT and WMV. How canit be done? Thanks for the feedback Eric - and tell Rick I said 'hi'. --- Sanford Dickert Rawlings Atlantic Inc (954) 323 4450 Sent from my treo 650 -Original Message- From: Eric Lunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro Date: Thu Dec 7, 2006 1:14 pm Size: 1K To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Hey there Sanford. Is there something we can do to improve the XML that comes out? Please let us know ... we're constantly incorporating suggestions from feed publishers and consumers. Eric Lunt CTO, FeedBurner --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using it at GoodnightBurbank.com - and it is alright. As a code-cutter, I am frustrated with the resulting XML from the feeds - but can survive. As for total stats - it is okay, but I did appreciate podtrac stats until we started having redirect problems. Sanford --- Sanford Dickert Rawlings Atlantic Inc (954) 323 4450 Sent from my treo 650 -Original Message- From: bofoboho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: [videoblogging] Re: Feedburner TotalStats Pro Date: Thu Dec 7, 2006 5:49 am Size: 1K To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Wouldn't know not using it? You like? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nathan Miller cmynewshoes@ wrote: Is anyone using the TotalStats Pro feature Feedburner offers??? If so, how do you like it??? Nathan Miller www.bicycle-sidewalk.com Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links --- message truncated ---
[videoblogging] Re: Tangentially Related to Videoblogs
Cool. Thanks everyone. I'll try both Mike and Steve's ideas, and see what comes out. -- Chris... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You may want to include it in a textarea tag so that people can easily copy paste, or include it in a code /code tagset so that it looks like code -- i.e. Courier font.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Media RSS what?
I used to include alternate media (real) in my MRSS but I couldn't find anyone, including Yahoo that seemed to implement it in a reader - so I went to seperate feeds as a better solution. joly --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com ---
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
The comparison between the internet and the printing press is fascinating. I agree that there are some very interesting developments during the middle ages as the church began too lose its monopoly on scribing to the more democratized printing model that most definitely are applicable to today's situation in the world of internet video, but there is one startling difference. It was impossible to control the distribution of content in that time. There were no pipes, no tubes, and even the most ruthless and capable despot could not limit the distribution of the written word. Today on the other hand, with the lack of privacy and the breadcrumbs that are strewn about all over in our internet world, I think it can be clamped down on like never before. The move to limit our access to content in order to ensure the big guys ability to deliver their content is a major impediment to distribution and the trackability and lack of privacy make for a different situation from the rise of literacy and the transformation from an institutional scribing system to a more open printing system. I hope that makes sense... Thanks for the interesting reading and thoughts. Cheers, Ron On Dec 7, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Heath wrote: Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Tames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution medium. David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
I agree with that 100%, I am just curious what the tipping point isand it always goes back to what the individual is trying to accomplish, which for me changes daily.. ;) I just think it's interesting where we are at, and where we are going.can it be done? Can we really change things? I hope soI really do Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the end of the day it's about what you want to talk about and how many people you want to reach, no? -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heath Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:30 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Tames david@ wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution medium. David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096 Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
well, you can : - make a difference - make a name - make a brand - make a difference it's nice when this is done in order. sull On 12/7/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with that 100%, I am just curious what the tipping point isand it always goes back to what the individual is trying to accomplish, which for me changes daily.. ;) I just think it's interesting where we are at, and where we are going.can it be done? Can we really change things? I hope soI really do Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the end of the day it's about what you want to talk about and how many people you want to reach, no? -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Heath Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:30 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, David Tames david@ wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution medium. David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096 Yahoo! Groups Links -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
I guess that any 'we' really can change things, but not always in the way that was intended, unforseen consequences are inevitable. I think things have already changed, there are questions about quite how far it will go, how knows. I randomly switched on the TV here in the UK a few nights ago and after the main 10PM news bulletin on BBC One, there was a program about the internet, its evolution, and it got onto blogging, myspace, youtube, and that whole longtail thing. It was good, if a little bit arty/intellectual. One of the things they got most excited about was the wikipedia phenomenon. I think that if online videos of various sorts could do something colaborative on as impressive a scale as wikipedia has, that would be a very nice thing. It was pointed out that some of the languages what wikipedia is being written in, have never had an encyclopedia of any sort before! Now thats what I call progress, and the decentralised nature of wikipedia always floats my boat. Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with that 100%, I am just curious what the tipping point isand it always goes back to what the individual is trying to accomplish, which for me changes daily.. ;) I just think it's interesting where we are at, and where we are going.can it be done? Can we really change things? I hope soI really do Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote: At the end of the day it's about what you want to talk about and how many people you want to reach, no? -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heath Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:30 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Tames david@ wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to
[videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
Personaly I think you make a differance one person at a time, kinda like that whole pay it forward thing ;) Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspto.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, you can : - make a difference - make a name - make a brand - make a difference it's nice when this is done in order. sull On 12/7/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with that 100%, I am just curious what the tipping point isand it always goes back to what the individual is trying to accomplish, which for me changes daily.. ;) I just think it's interesting where we are at, and where we are going.can it be done? Can we really change things? I hope soI really do Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote: At the end of the day it's about what you want to talk about and how many people you want to reach, no? -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Heath Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:30 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com, David Tames david@ wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution medium. David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096 Yahoo! Groups Links -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com
[videoblogging] Fwd: [new-media-alumni] New video application at Discovery.com
hey guys, this is from someone who went to columbia jschool a few years before me -- Forwarded message -- From: Trisha Creekmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Columbia J-school New Media Program: http://newmedia.jrn.columbia.edu * http://www.nyc24.org --- --- Hi everyone, We recently debuted an interactive video experience that we're very proud of. Discovery Channel was on Everest in May and captured some amazing footage by attaching cameras to Sherpas' helmets. Very little video has ever been captured above Camp 4 due to temperature, weight and human incapacitation. So this stuff is pretty unique. The interactive allows you to see all video shot between Camp 4 to the summit and back. Three Sherpas had cameras and all feeds are aligned by time. http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/everestbeyond/sherpacam/sherpacam.html Our tech people couldn't find anyone to help them develop it, so we're pretty sure it's fairly innovative. There is currently about 36 hours of video streaming through the application. After we add Day 2, there will be nearly 60 hours. Would love to hear what you think! Trisha Creekmore J'95 _ Visit MSN Holiday Challenge for your chance to win up to $50,000 in Holiday cash from MSN today! http://www.msnholidaychallenge.com/index.aspx?ocid=taglinelocale=en-us --- You are currently subscribed to the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism new-media-alumni list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media
thats what i was gett'n at ;) On 12/7/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personaly I think you make a differance one person at a time, kinda like that whole pay it forward thing ;) Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspto.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, you can : - make a difference - make a name - make a brand - make a difference it's nice when this is done in order. sull On 12/7/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with that 100%, I am just curious what the tipping point isand it always goes back to what the individual is trying to accomplish, which for me changes daily.. ;) I just think it's interesting where we are at, and where we are going.can it be done? Can we really change things? I hope soI really do Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote: At the end of the day it's about what you want to talk about and how many people you want to reach, no? -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Heath Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:30 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Al online viewing booms, the amateurs give way to big media Yes, the small users are driving inovation but sooner or later the big guys take notice and they have money, time and talent. And again, I am looking at this from the viewer's perspective and the average joe.how many average, everyday people who go to work, come home, make dinner and sit down in front of the tube, how many of them are going to watch me talk about the vloggies or bacon or The Ask a Ninja guy(who I love btw) but I wonder, what the cap for this medium is.how many people will want to watch just stuffpeople like to be entertained, bigger is better and so on..will that attitude change? Because if it doesn't It's an interesting thought..I know I don't have any answers, but what else is new.. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging% 40yahoogroups.com, David Tames david@ wrote: Interesting article... I think it's dangerous to put too much faith in the belief that trends and outcomes from the past are a reflection of what is happening today and going to happen tomorrow. I think that there's a significantly different thing going on today in the media and entertainment industry than has gone on in the past: end users are driving the innovation, and video blogging is a crisp example of this. I wrote an article for IMAGINE (a trade magazine that covers film, video, and multimedia production in New England) for the Dec'06/ Jan'07 issue titled: Macro Trends in Media and Entertainment, which I subsequently updated: http://kino-eye.com/2006/09/30/macro-trends-rio2006/ Document: Macro-Trends-v2.pdf (PDF, 164 KB) What do you think of my premise? I'm planning to release a Version 3 after I add more video sharing sites and round out the arguments. I'd love some feedback from this group before I complete a new version of the article. Regardless of the fact that the large media players will claim a large percentage of the total media and entertainment activity on the internet, independent producers (video bloggers, independent filmmakers, small organizations, etc) will still have a percentage, and that percentage will be significantly larger than it has been in the past through the hundred year history of cinema, television, radio, cable, and now the internet. So personal and independent media will have much more significant access to an audience than it had before. This is a trend near and dear to my heart that I've been tracking since 1988 when people were saying the Hi8 camcorder revolution would democratize the media. But I argued with my fellow filmmakers back then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation. You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access to distribution. The internet today
Re: [videoblogging] Windows Server and .mp4
Thanks guys - he got it working. -Verdi On 12/7/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh cool. So this sounds basically like adding a mime type to a .htaccess file on a linux server? Thanks Josh. -Verdi On 12/7/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's what I found with a quick Google search... I've never dealt with IIS either: http://www.inventua.com/forums.content?forumid=1postid=168view=topic - You can fix this by adding a MIME type for mp4 in the IIS manager. To do this: 1. Open IIS Manager 2. Find your virtual directory/web site, right click, select Properties 3. Click the HTTP Headers tab. In the tab, click the MIME Types button down the bottom. 4. Click New. Enter extension .mp4, MIME type video/mp4. Click OK. - On 12/7/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]michael%40michaelverdi.com wrote: Can anyone help this guy who emailed me? I am running windows server 2003 and I cant get it to read the .mp4 extention. Do you know how to enable it? Here is the error I get... HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found. Internet Information Services (IIS) I've never worked with a windows server before. Thanks, Verdi -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Creative Commons update
From: Lawrence Lessig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:28:14 -0800 From our last letter: CC has come to be about much more than just licenses, and certainly much more than any of us dreamed. The story continued: So this week we launched a fresh face to the Creative Commons website. Built within WordPress, we hope the site will make it easier for people to understand and use our tools. Most noticeable are the new CC license icons, which expressly indicate the terms of the particular CC license used. But with this letter, we also launch a new page at the CC site -- labs.creativecommons.org. At CC Labs, we begin to demo some cool new innovations that the CC team has been working on. In this letter, I'll describe three of these innovations. The most important -- by far -- is an extension to the CC model that I first described in these letters last year [ http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/ 5704 ]. I suspect nothing will be as important in spreading the CC model as this critical extension. First, however, let me describe the other two innovations. One very difficult issue we've faced from the start is making understandable the freedoms our licenses are intended to provide. We've made that task more difficult by emphasizing in the names we've given to our licenses the limits on the freedoms, rather than the freedoms themselves. Thus, we talk about the CC-BY license which says you must give attribution, but doesn't say you have the freedom to share and remix this content. For people who get it, this isn't a problem. But for people not yet on this page, emphasizing requirements, or restrictions, doesn't seem very free. One step towards solving this problem is a tool to give people a more intuitive sense of the freedoms they're allowing, and the conditions they're imposing. That's the aim of our Freedoms License Chooser. [ http://labs.creativecommons.org/freedomslicense ]. When you open the page, you're presented with four puzzle pieces that are interlinked. The top two in green specify the freedoms you can select to apply to your creativity: the freedom to Share, or the freedom to Remix, or both. On the bottom, there are two limiting conditions -- in red -- that you can select to restrict the freedoms you have granted: NonCommercial, or ShareAlike, or both. Not all combinations are possible. (For example, if you don't give the freedom to Remix, you can't require that others ShareAlike, since ShareAlike is a restriction on remixes or derivative works.) As you toggle the freedoms and limitations, the resulting license is displayed in the center of the puzzle. Click through all the options and you begin to get a much more intuitive sense of the shape of the commons. The second example of CC Labs is also a licensing engine, again designed to make it easier to understand and implement CC licenses. It begins with the same questions that the Freedoms License Chooser has -- select the freedoms and select the limitations. More insistently than before, it also asks you to give more information about your work, so that the metadata attached to your work makes the license more valuable. But then this License Generator gives an option we haven't had before. In the current version, it asks where the license will be applied -- on a web page, or (and this is the cool part) in MySpace. If you select a web page, then, as always, the tool gives you the code to paste into the web page. But if you select MySpace, then it asks you to select a style, and indicate whether you want a floating license or a license for your profile. If you select a floating position, then the CC license governing the content on your MySpace page will live at the bottom of the screen. Ok, so these innovations are designed to do a bit better what we've always done. The last innovation on CC Labs, however, will radically change the scope and reach of CC licenses. You might not think so given the title of this innovation -- Metadata Lab. It's the nature of tech-types to be understated. But I don't think we could overstate the importance of this new innovation. And in the few words left in this letter, I want to introduce you to this potential. As you know, CC licenses are nonexclusive. That means the terms of the CC license are general, offered to anyone in the world. But they don't limit the author's right to enter into other deals. So for example, my book, Free Culture, is offered under a CC BY-NC-SA license, meaning anyone is free to take and modify the work, but only for noncommercial purposes. Yet I also have another deal with my publisher that permits it to sell the book (something that's not permitted by the NC license). That deal is not inconsistent with the CC license, since again the CC license is not exclusive. The CC license says, Here are the terms that anyone in the world can take. But
[videoblogging] Re: Video Blog on Days of Our Lives
Hello? He--llo? Does nobody care? Days of Our Lives PEOPLE! What... are you all afraid of offending Dan McVicar??? *sigh* My mother taped it... so if any of you care, I can put it online at some point. *sigh* Casey McKinnon, Full-time Videoblogger, Part-time Soap Opera Watcher --- http://www.galacticast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey everyone, I was just working on my laptop while watching Days of Our Lives (guilty pleasure) and they mentioned that Chelsea (Bo and Billie's daughter) has a Video Blog. The episode aired today from 1-2pm EST, if anyone on the west coast can record it when it airs over there, please do. I think others would get a kick out of it... Best, Casey --- Casey McKinnon Executive Producer, Galacticast http://www.galacticast.com/
[videoblogging] Re: NYC December food, drinks, mirth
I'm in! See you then... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.bullemhead.com/seasonal/art-bar-on-the-15th.html What: Drinks and food (menu http://www.merchantsny.com/art/art_menu.php) When: 7:00pm, Friday, December 15th Where: Art Bar - Map http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52+Eighth+Ave+Ny,+10014- Subway directionshttp://www.hopstop.com/map?zip=10014address=52+8TH+AVEnearby=s Who: You and me and some other people Why: Because I like the Art Bar and haven't been in a while, because I haven't seen a lot of the people that are going to show up in a long time, and because MissB http://missbhavens.blogspot.com/ has the night off. See you there, AQ PS. Also note that Andrew is having a meetup on the 12th: http://videoblog.meetup.com/8/calendar/5270367/ I'm going to that one too. On 12/6/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, raise your hand if you can meet up December 15 in NYC. So far me and MissB are coming, and that's probably enough to have a good time, but the more the merrier. AQ On 12/6/06, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, ThePAN screening info at Pioneer Theatre this Sunday. http://www.tix.com/Event.asp?Event=79336 I want videos and footage, and DVD, and a packed house. All you NY vloggers better show up. You don't want to make me come to NY! -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]groups-yahoo-com%40mmeiser.com wrote: Wish I could come. As always. Just felt you needed my moral support. ... for validation. ;) LOL And congrats on the pioneer theatre screening. Heh! If you have a graphic please send it over to us. I know it's coming up fast, but I tink it's something we should be promoting on the meef. LOL... the meef, that's Mefeedia. Sorry... someone called it that and now it's stuck in my head. It's hilarious. Send us a grpahic, mefeedia needs to promote more cool things like theatre screenings and vlog events, we've been a little remis. Speaking of which, did everyone see the AskANinja DVD is out!? http://askaninja.com/dvd Someone needs to pimp this stuff. :) Peace, -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 12/6/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED]missbhavens1969%40yahoo.com wrote: where do I sign? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk bullemhead@ wrote: Let's do something then. I'll try to get a few people together. I'm sure Jan and Dan Liss and the Blip kids would come. I'll email everyone later today after I'm done working. AQ On 12/4/06, missbhavens1969 missbhavens1969@ wrote: AR!!! Bummer. I had the 15th off. Not so on the 12th. Catch y'all in January. Or maybe February or March. :( Bekah --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk bullemhead@ wrote: http://videoblog.meetup.com/8/calendar/5270367/ This ^ meetup is already being organized, so I'm gonna hit that up instead of starting a new one. See you there, AQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog on Days of Our Lives
Hey, My Mom has watched that show religiously since she was a little kid. And because, growing up, no one was allowed to change the channel (or even really talk) when it was on... I know way too much about that show. Like who Bo's real father is. And that Bo and Billy never had a daughter before but now they did... but hey it's days of our lives. H... I find it somewhat disturbing that I know that. See ya On 12/7/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello? He--llo? Does nobody care? Days of Our Lives PEOPLE! What... are you all afraid of offending Dan McVicar??? *sigh* My mother taped it... so if any of you care, I can put it online at some point. *sigh* Casey McKinnon, Full-time Videoblogger, Part-time Soap Opera Watcher --- http://www.galacticast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey everyone, I was just working on my laptop while watching Days of Our Lives (guilty pleasure) and they mentioned that Chelsea (Bo and Billie's daughter) has a Video Blog. The episode aired today from 1-2pm EST, if anyone on the west coast can record it when it airs over there, please do. I think others would get a kick out of it... Best, Casey --- Casey McKinnon Executive Producer, Galacticast http://www.galacticast.com/ -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
