[Vo]:E-Cat Commercialization in the Americas

2011-07-07 Thread Harry Veeder

E-Cat Commercialization in the Americas
27 June 2011, 13:18 
New York – AmpEnergo Inc. along with Leonardo Corporation and the inventor Dr. 
Andrea Rossi are working on commercializing the E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer) 
technology in the Americas, including North America, Central America, South 
America, and the Caribbean.  Current efforts involve setting up strategic 
financial and business partnerships and negotiating licensing agreements with 
interested parties.  At the present time AmpEnergo Inc. is not offering stock 
to the general public, but we appreciate the many inquiries and words of 
support we have received.  We look forward to bringing this world changing 
energy technology to market and will keep you informed of future developments. 

http://ampenergo.com/?m=201106

Harry



>>
>
>



[Vo]:the simulations of the e-Cat

2011-07-07 Thread Harry Veeder
The simulations are ironic because they suggest that the issue of steam quality 
was/is overblown.  
The hose diameters are too small in both the stove demo and Tinsla Koala's 
demo, 
and Koala's hose is too short. From the Krivit video I would estimate the 
inside diameter is 2 to 2.5cm. Over all they very poor simulations given that 
they don't even look like an e-Cat.
 
Harry  

 


From: Harry Veeder 
>To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" 
>Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2011 10:43:08 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...
>
>
>How often does the city experience dust storms like that?
> 
>(Been having trouble posting all day)
>Harry
>
>
>From: Mark Iverson 
>>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2011 6:41:20 PM
>>Subject: [Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...
>>
>>Amazing video (time-lapse) of massive dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona...
>>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYnuzoH5oBA&feature=related 
>>
>>Note the sky above the leading edge and how clouds form... Temperature and 
>>pressure must be changing
>>quite dramatically.
>>
>>-Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Vo]:proposed electric heat only scheme for Rossi demos re heat and explosions: Rich Murray 2011.07.07

2011-07-07 Thread Rich Murray
proposed electric heat only scheme for Rossi demos re heat and
explosions: Rich Murray 2011.07.07
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.htm
Thursday, July 7, 2011
[ at end of each long page, click on Older Posts ]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/89
[ you may have to Copy and Paste URLs into your browser ]
__


http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/Report2-372-EnergyCatalyzerScientificCommunicationAndEthicsIssues.shtml

I examined the 2011.06.14 13:24 minute Krivit-Rossi demo video, frame
by frame for 13 frames, while the end of the black hose was held
against a black sweater, from 11:26 to 11:39 -- I estimated from the
normal speed video that the frame rate was about 5 frames per second.

The views in seconds 11:35, 11:36, 11:37 show the shadow of the black
hose outlet end against the black sweater, with the left edge of the
upward moving mist clearly visible in all three frames rising up and
slanting more to the left, right from the very end of the hose.

Someone skillful could get all the frames, and image process them into
an enhanced slow-motion video, allowing fairly accurate estimates of
velocities and volume of the moving, expanding mist.

In order for invisible steam to condense into the very tiny droplets
of water that make up visible hot mist, all the heat of vaporization
has to be absorbed by air or radiated.

Within the black tube, as the flow of steam reaches the end, if it has
already expanded by a volume factor of 2 from the inlet of the black
tube, then its temperature in degrees K would drop from 474 to 237 by
the same factor of 2 for the same pressure, but it still has to give
up its large heat of vaporization to become very tiny droplets of
water.  If the hot steam, mist, and condensed water mixture, always
changing complexly with time and location along the hose (and possibly
vertically in the about 2 m length of hose on the floor, from liquid
to mist to steam), flows for a long time, then the hose will become
almost as hot, limiting the loss of heat in the flowing complex
mixture.

Then, as the flowing, almost 100 deg C complex mixture approaches the
end of the hose, it will accelerate forward, expanding in volume
within the tube, but not able condense into very tiny droplets of mist
until it exits the end of the tube.

Then it will expand as a cone, rapidly losing pressure and mixing
complexly with entrained air in a turbulence process, heating the air
until it is cool enough to very rapidly form a mist of very tiny water
droplets, visible at the 0.6 micron wavelength of visible light.

However, the fact that the exiting mixture of steam and mist is
already visible right at the exit, indicates that the mixture is only
partly steam, and may actually be all mist already.

In addition, if the volume of condensed water within the hose is not
specifically and accurately monitored, then it is impossible to
estimate how much steam has been condensing to water within the hose.

It is also possible that only a tiny amount of water becomes steam in
the reaction chamber.

We need an experiment that is made of transparent pyrex glass, from
the reaction device to the 3 m of exit piping, with several high speed
digital thermometers, paired with microphones to listen for
turbulence, and webcams to record images of the complex flow, with the
input water dyed to make the turbulence visible -- then flow
velocities can be accurately found and mist formation and water
turbulence studied at all locations.

Many people have the skills and equipment to rapidly assemble and test
an "electric heater only" mock up of the Rossi demo.  My friend
Michael H. Barron here in Santa Fe uses an Italian steam cleaner that
takes about 700-800 watts to vaporize distilled water in a strong
steel ball chamber, forming dry steam that exits a flexible 1 m hose
with an outlet about 5 mm inside diameter.  We were just talking on
Skype about measuring how far from the exit the dry steam goes before
becoming visible mist in the air.  He worked at LANL for years,
assembling complex experiments, and has a remarkable collection of
equipment and a network of dedicated geeks.  So, maybe, we'll try a
quick hack...

Rossi has mentioned, without any details, that in recent years dozens
of cells have exploded.  It may be that as water collects in and fills
the 2 m of hose on the floor, the resulting barrier is enough to slow
the steam exiting from the compact reactor, formed from the 2 ml/sec
fixed input water flow by electric heaters above 500 W power.  As dry
steam builds up in the reactor, it may impede the radiation and
convection transfer of heat from the electric heater, leading to a
transient high temperature excursion that softens and melts and then
destroys the Ni nanopowder and the copper and stainless steel wall.
Rapid accumulation of mineral deposits from city water could also
further insulate the heater.  If disruption of the container holding
50 gm of 

Re: [Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...

2011-07-07 Thread Harry Veeder
How often does the city experience dust storms like that?
 
(Been having trouble posting all day)
Harry

From: Mark Iverson 
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2011 6:41:20 PM
>Subject: [Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...
>
>Amazing video (time-lapse) of massive dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona...
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYnuzoH5oBA&feature=related 
>
>Note the sky above the leading edge and how clouds form... Temperature and 
>pressure must be changing
>quite dramatically.
>
>-Mark
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...

2011-07-07 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
Yes, amazing looking.  I've been in the middle of several of these and they
can be really weird -- it can be dead calm as a cloud of dust slowly moves
over.

Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona

-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...


Amazing video (time-lapse) of massive dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYnuzoH5oBA&feature=related

Note the sky above the leading edge and how clouds form... Temperature and
pressure must be changing
quite dramatically.

-Mark




Re: [Vo]:Defkalion comments on the role of the electric heater

2011-07-07 Thread Alan J Fletcher

At 03:18 PM 7/7/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This sounds like the heater is used only to bring the cell up to the 
operating temperature to trigger the reaction. I think they said the 
method of regulating the reaction is to vary gas pressure, rather 
than Rossi's method of changing the auxiliary electric heater power.


There appear to be substantial differences between the way Defkalion 
engineers the cells and controls them, and the way Rossi does.


- Jed


(I don't see a way to get the link)
Re: Wish list for ECAT device

Dave wrote:
3) There seems to be a great deal of confusion regarding the 
operation of the external heating element. Is this element active 
during normal operation of the Hyperion?.


Yes

Dave wrote:
4) Do you use the external heating element as part of the power control loop?.

Yes



[Vo]: Time-lapse of massive dust storm hitting Phoenix...

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
Amazing video (time-lapse) of massive dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYnuzoH5oBA&feature=related 

Note the sky above the leading edge and how clouds form... Temperature and 
pressure must be changing
quite dramatically.

-Mark




[Vo]:Vortex-l Backup Resend

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
(Sorry if this shows up more than once)

Just in case of a catastrophic failure of the Vortex-l list.  I have
created a yahoo group called Vortex-l Backup.

The homepage is:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vortex-l-backup

and the email address is:  vortex-l-bac...@yahoogroups.com

Right now it is wide open.  You don't even have to join to post.  All
file archives are open.

This is NOT an attempt to hijack Bill Beaty's group.  God Forbid!

Note that you will have to join if you want posts remailed to your address.

You may send your messages to both lists if you wish.

T



[Vo]:Defkalion comments on the role of the electric heater

2011-07-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
This sounds like the heater is used only to bring the cell up to the
operating temperature to trigger the reaction. I think they said the method
of regulating the reaction is to vary gas pressure, rather than Rossi's
method of changing the auxiliary electric heater power.

There appear to be substantial differences between the way Defkalion
engineers the cells and controls them, and the way Rossi does.

- Jed

QUESTION

Defkalion GT,

In another thread you wrote, and I quote:

Defkalion GT wrote:
(there are no industrial secrets living in the electric heater or its role)


In light of this, would you please tell us what purpose the *two* electric
heaters serve in the e-Cat? From previous comments made by Rossi, I
understand that the first heater is a "primary" or "main" and the second a
"safety".

Regarding the primary heater, how is it that a heater can be used to *
control* the robust exothermic reaction in the e-Cat? If the primary heater
is disengaged, does this cause the reaction to cease in a rapid fashion?

And if this is correct, how can a second heater serve as a safety device? If
the reaction can be controlled or shut down by removing power from the first
heater, wouldn't engaging the second heater just re-start the reaction?
Under which circumstances would the safety heater be engaged or disengaged?

You can see how this may be confusing and appear contradictory - but the
answers may lie in what is meant by 'safety' in this instance. Can you
please explain the purpose and action of the safety heater - and who or what
is being kept safe from what potential harm or other eventuality?

Thank you in advance. Reasonable answers to these questions would be greatly
appreciated by myself, and others as well.


ANSWER

In a post 
(viewtopic.php?f=3&t=54)
we answered to one quiestion on our products functionality as follows:

*
Every kW Hyperion products is equiped with electronics and sensors that,
among other, monitor in "real time" the mass/sec and the temperature
difference (Delta) between output and input of the coolant in use (mass
calorimeter). If this Delta is beyond a pre-defined point at products
installation then:
If it is a singe reactor unit, the reactor stops
If it is a multi-reactor unit, then either some reactor(s) stop or all
reactors stop based to a performance balance algorithm within
safety/operational electronics.
So, to answer your question: If you "consume" the heat energy, then the
Hyperion continious to produce heat energy so you can achive max performance
at any time of the day. If you do not "consume", Hyperion turns off and then
on automaticaly.*

The electric heating system is part of the switching system of our products.
It is required to heat the reactor every time it is needed to be turned on,
as already explained also by A.Rossi and described in his patent
application. This switching mechanism is playing a significant role on the
functionality and safety of our products.

There is not any positive contribution from the electric heating system to
the performance ratio of our products.

Thank you for your question and your interest on our products.


RE: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
T:
You mean a 'dream' like the one of the snake and carbon-ring structure?

Did it work out? Was it another example of the unconscious mind solving the 
problem before the
conscious mind became aware of it?

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Mark Iverson  wrote:
> He also uses: Tinsel Koala

Yes, the same dude who allegedly made a self running "whipmag" motor based on a 
dream by a member of
the Steorn forum.

T




Re: [Vo]:This is a hard-luck country-western ballad ISP?

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
Yeah, uh, a bit disconcerting.

Just in case of a catastrophic failure of the Vortex-l list.  I have
created a yahoo group called Vortex-l Backup.

The homepage is:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vortex-l-backup

and the email address is:  vortex-l-bac...@yahoogroups.com

Right now it is wide open.  You don't even have to join to post.  All
file archives are open.

This is NOT an attempt to hijack Bill Beaty's group.  God Forbid!

It's just that Carl is out of spares and Robert is, er, not out.

T



Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Joshua Cude
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jouni Valkonen 
 wrote:

> If considered that in E-Cat there is constantly flowing cool water to
> replenish boiled water, then it is quite obvious that 2.5 kilowatt is
> very much possible with Mats' E-Cat.



I disagree. Heating the constant flow of cool water (at 1 g/L) to the
boiling point consumes 300W in Lewan's experiment. That can be calculated.
That leaves 2.2 kW for steam production, to be compared directly with the
video. Even if you consider the two plumes to be similar, Lewan's claim is
at least a factor of 2 too high. 2.5 kW is not very much possible.

But the plume in Lewan's video seems far smaller than the in the kitchen
video, meaning that a small increase in the power by Rossi when he is
off-camera can easily explain the observations.

The thing about the 4 or 5 or 10 kW claims is that they make faking it much
more difficult, because ordinary mains circuits don't usually supply that
kind of power. Once you reduce these claims into the kW or few hundred watt
range, then some simple power or flow rate misrepresentations is all it
takes.

However Steven's E-Cat was
> malfunctioning while video was shot.
>

Has Rossi made this excuse, or have you taken to making excuses for him?


>
> That stove was quite modern, therefore it is likely that around 90% of
> heat goes for boiling water, because it is good idea to design stoves
> that produces as little as possible waste heat.


The stove design has nothing to do with how much heat is captured by the
pot. You can see the heating element. That means IR is quite clearly
escaping. Look at the trouble Rossi went to to insulate his ecat, so that
all the heat went in to the water. In the kitchen video, heat escapes before
it enters the pot, and the pot itself is not insulated, and quite large, and
will also lose heat.

  This is the only reasonable way to calculate the power

> output. Because we know that this kind of setup produces DRY STEAM and
> we can calculate the power directly from the reduced mass of the pot.
>

Drier steam, presumably, but a boiler typically produces 5% wet steam. In
the write-up, they say they produced both dry and wet steam.


Re: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Mark Iverson  wrote:
> He also uses: Tinsel Koala

Yes, the same dude who allegedly made a self running "whipmag" motor
based on a dream by a member of the Steorn forum.

T



Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Alan J Fletcher

[  Delayed by jail-house-mail  -- should be BEFORE my comment on test3 ]

At 11:16 AM 7/7/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:

Take a look at this video, simulating steam production at 1200W with a
4m long hose:  .
What do you think?


Not enough controls.

But THIS guy's interesting  TinselKoala  (his videos are long, 
but show the whole process)
Ah again    See the Stella Nokia anagram thread.   It only 
just struck me they're the same.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsXwRRivQ9Y  eKitty1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bELcYma26aI Boiling water at 800W
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dau3nBNxDSo eKitty supplemental -- 
thermometer callibration


At 800W he boiled 40mL of water in 180 secs. That's 0.22 mL/sec 
compared to Rossi/Krivit's 2mL/sec


There's a Test 3 I haven't watched yet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17ser9_tGiU

In a separate series he did some amusing electrical stuff on a "Joule 
Thief" -- highlighting the perils of HF futz on electrical circuits:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDfrzBIxoQ












Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Alan J Fletcher

At 01:48 PM 7/7/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:

There's a Test 3 I haven't watched yet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17ser9_tGiU


Oops -- that's a different one -- Mr Powerpuff.

But it DOES show how water collects in the hose.



Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
The original post is here:

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.energikatalysatorn.se%2Fforum%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D2%26t%3D143



Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Jouni Valkonen
If considered that in E-Cat there is constantly flowing cool water to
replenish boiled water, then it is quite obvious that 2.5 kilowatt is
very much possible with Mats' E-Cat. However Steven's E-Cat was
malfunctioning while video was shot.

That stove was quite modern, therefore it is likely that around 90% of
heat goes for boiling water, because it is good idea to design stoves
that produces as little as possible waste heat. However it would have
been a good idea to measure weight of the pot before and after the
experiment. This is the only reasonable way to calculate the power
output. Because we know that this kind of setup produces DRY STEAM and
we can calculate the power directly from the reduced mass of the pot.

–Jouni



Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
The woven works at 1700W.



RE: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
He also uses: Tinsel Koala

-Mark

  _  

From: Alan J Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff


At 12:54 PM 7/7/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:


Nikola Tesla...


Ahhh . 


Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Jed Rothwell

It is hard to tell, but that does look similar to NyTeknik's video.

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Alan J Fletcher  wrote:

 At 12:54 PM 7/7/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
>
> Nikola Tesla...
>
>
> Ahhh .
>

It can't be him. He's dead.

- Jed


[Vo]:This is a hard-luck country-western ballad ISP?

2011-07-07 Thread Jed Rothwell

Good grief!

Terry Blanton reports that this discussion group is being hosted on an 
ISP afflicted with the problems of a country-western hard-luck ballad; 
i.e., the dog died, Robert is in prison, and the singer's best friend 
left with the truck and the wife:


   That would be Carl.  He's kinda filling in.  Here's a post from the
   EskimoNorthUsers Yahoo group from Tuesday:

   Today the mail server crashed, and the web server crashed. The mail
   server is now back online, however the web server really bit the
   dust this time. The cpu in it died. I have replaced the motherboard
   and cpu, with one that has two cpu's on it. They are both 300Mhz,
   instead of 400mhz, but there is two of them instead of one.
   Hopefully they can handle the load for now because it's all I have
   for spares until Robert gets out of Prison. . . .


I thought this kind of ISP went extinct in the 1990s.

Maybe we should consider moving to another ISP? The problem with 
rejected messages is annoying.


- Jed



RE: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Alan J Fletcher


At 12:54 PM 7/7/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:

Nikola Tesla...
Ahhh . 




RE: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
Josh wrote:
 
"Surely someone so brilliant to find the solution to the world's energy 
problems, should be able to
design an airtight demonstration of it, that the galloping gourmet can't 
dispute." 
 
I'm sure Rossi could if he wanted to... he just doesn't have the time, and has 
stated that several
times.  Live with it.  It certainly isn't a valid reason for making any kind of 
conclusions...
 
Doing these demos has been a distraction for him, and they aren't important to 
achieving his
short-term goal of getting the 1MW plant online in Oct.

-Mark

 


RE: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
Nikola Tesla...

-Mark

  _  

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff


On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Alan J Fletcher  wrote: 
 

Re: Unban Stella_Nokia




Recognize the anagram?

T 


Re: [Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Joshua Cude
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Rocha  wrote:

> Take a look at this video, simulating steam production at 1200W with a
> 4m long hose:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVwINedGR_Q
>
> It does look like the swedish's magzine video, NyTeknik, including the
> weird sounds, around 1200W:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8SeOteFPtM
>
> What do you think?
>
>
1. Lewan claimed 2.3 to 2.6 kW (of which 300 W is needed to heat the water
to the boiling point). So at least 2 kW would have been going in to the
steam formation. In Krivit's case, more than 4 kW go into making steam.

2. The steam from this video looks like a lot more steam to me than Lewan
showed, especially more than what was shown when Lewan's camera first pans
into the other room. The steam or bubbling seems to increase substantially
while Lewan examines it, and Rossi is off-camera. And the steam is certainly
far more than observed in the Krivit video.

3. The new video uses a heating element underneath the pot, not inside the
water. The heater is clearly visible in the video, which means a substantial
fraction of the heat will not have made it into the water.

Best case for Rossi: The levels of steam are similar, and the efficiency in
the stovetop video is 100%, Lewan is exaggerating the output power by a
factor of 2, and Krivit (or Rossi in Krivit's demo) by a factor of 4.

Medium case: The efficiency of the stove heating is 60%, the steam in
Lewan's and Krivit's video is 60% as much as in the stovetop video. Then the
steam in the ecat demo videos represents about 400 W. In Lewan's case, given
the input 300W is consumed to raise the water to boiling, that would
represent 400 W excess, a factor of 5 lower than Lewan claimed. In Krivit's
case, the input 800 W exceeds the power needed to raise the water to boiling
by 200W, so that represents about 200W excess, a factor of 20 less than
Rossi claimed.

Most likely case: The stove efficiency is 60% and the steam in the ecat
videos is 60% as much as in the stovetop video, and the flow rate or input
power are misrepresented a little. In Krivit's case, if the flow rate is
lower by a factor of 2, then only 300W is needed to heat the water, leaving
500W to produce steam, entirely consistent with what is observed. In Lewan's
case, if the power is increased to 700 W, then subtracting 300W to heat the
water, leaves 400W for steam, again consistent with observation.

Of course the numbers are guesses. But the video clearly demonstrates that
the output power is without question exaggerated in both the Lewan and
Krivit demos. Considering the input power could have easily been raised to
more than 1 kW, it demonstrates that plausible misrepresentations can
explain all the observations, without invoking exotic nuclear reactions.

But we should all agree that this situation is profoundly silly. That
experiments in someone's kitchen with a roll of masking tape, a cooking pot,
and a garden hose can raise questions about a demonstration of a
revolutionary new source of energy, should give everyone pause.

Surely someone so brilliant to find the solution to the world's energy
problems, should be able to design an airtight demonstration of it, that the
galloping gourmet can't dispute.


Re: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Alan J Fletcher  wrote:


> Re: Unban Stella_Nokia
>

Recognize the anagram?

T


[Vo]:Perfect simulation of e-cat with 1200W, for Lewan's video.

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
Take a look at this video, simulating steam production at 1200W with a
4m long hose:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVwINedGR_Q

It does look like the swedish's magzine video, NyTeknik, including the
weird sounds, around 1200W:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8SeOteFPtM

What do you think?



RE: [Vo]:OT: Economic Disruptions of the Global and Domestic Kind

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
Steven wrote:
"Sigh... guess I'll have to get my own."

Come on Steven, 'fess-up... that was your plan all along!!!
;-) 
Now you won't have to share...

-Mark



[Vo]:OT: Economic Disruptions of the Global and Domestic Kind

2011-07-07 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
In lieu of the potential disruptions to the global economy
corporations like Defkalion might eventually unleash across the
planet, I have a more personal story to tell of the economic
disruptive kind. ...Another sign-of-the-times.

A couple of weeks ago I bought an Apple i-Pad for, ahem... business
reasons. My wife and I go to science fiction conventions, and we
needed a practical way to accept real-time credit cards charges from
customers interested in purchasing items from our inventory of goods.
The i-Pad, i-Phone (as well as Android compatible devices can now
accept Credit Card charges real-time with the use of a tiny little
device called "The Square". See:

https://squareup.com/

All one needs to do is set up an account with Square. They charge
2.75% based on the total amount charged to the customer. Moneys go
directly to a designated bank account of your choice. The service is
easy and a lot cheaper to use than previous Merchant Card services I
had been forced to use for years. I would call the Square a major
economic disruptor within the Merchant Credit Card Services Industry.
Most of these other services charge a lot more than what the Square
charges. The Square is ideal for small and medium sized mom & pop
business enterprises, especially highly mobile ones.

Meanwhile, my wife, who had until now always been low-tech, slow-tech,
and no-tech, has become completely enamored with the i-Pad. She has
finally learned to surf the web via Safari. He is perusing garden &
art supply catalogues. She is even asking me to help set her up with
her own eMail account. But that's not the worst of it. We subscribe to
the Netflix service and I have installed iTunes and the Apple TV
"black cube". Both services are accessible on the i-Pad screen via the
household WiFi router. My wife is rapidly turning into an i-Pad video
junkie. She is currently main-lining the entire science fiction series
of FarScape... at least 3 episodic (fixes) per day. We are now
fighting over who gets to use the i-Pad.

Sigh... guess I'll have to get my own.

A Pox on you, Mr. Jobs!

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Comment from Defkalion forum -- miscellaneous stuff

2011-07-07 Thread Alan J Fletcher


[ This message is delayed from yesterday's "prison" foo
]

The defkalion search is working pretty well for me.

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/search.php?keywords=&terms=all&author=Defkalion+GT
 
A couple of goodies :
Re: Who are we communicating with @ Defkalion GT
 

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=229&p=2982&sid=fb0a615865a2ad3fd8e83a84cbf39747#p2982
 
we can not name user Defkalion GT a spokesman as far as during this week
consists of three men and a woman that are responsible to support and
monitor our forum. 
...
The one responsible to shoot with the keyboard this post works in R&D
and obviously is the good guy. Unfortunately this position (shooting with
the keyboard as the good guy) is a rolling, as far as every week a
different R&D good guy takes this responsibility. Very good chance to
rest and to see "what is going out there".
In most cases, comments posted as Defkalion GT are agreed within
the team. In case there is something we do not know, we go and ask heads
of other departments and then respond to you accordingly.
Two of this team, the ugly and the good, have personal experiences in
tests in different levels, including performance tests on e-cat lab
prototypes and Hyperions. 
...
- - - - - -
Re: Wish list for ECAT devices
 

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=139&p=2832&sid=fb0a615865a2ad3fd8e83a84cbf39747#p2832
 
Dave wrote:
2) A second part of this question is: At what temperature does the core
operate?.
The tempereratures of the e-cat/ kernel of Hyperion, never exceeds 500C
in a controlled operation. In case of fail of a critical component in
Hyperions, there are safety mechanisms that put kernel operation off. In
a non-controlled environment, meaning the operation of a e-cat with
extreme setup adjustments and with the absense of any controls, it is
posible to reach temperatures that melt the kernel. In all of such tests
performed, such melting conditions had stoped the reaction (which is not
a chain reaction) with no hazardus emitions of all kind. Still it is
dangerous due to very high temperatures. 
[ They confirm the external heater is always in ioperation, and part of
the control loop. ]
- - -
Is there any information on the E-Cat you can share with us NOW that
will make us believe it is real? 
Test results will be published. Why is it so important to believe
NOW? We are not selling any products or anything elese now. 
- - - -
They have a sense of humor on SOME things :
Re: Atmosphere At Defkalion
 

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=227&p=2933&sid=fb0a615865a2ad3fd8e83a84cbf39747#p2933
 
They do not allow us yet to perform explosions of Hyperions at the beach
(according to some people believes, we must have something very explosive
in our hands). 
[ and they liked the Hitler video ]
BUT they banned  a poster who "insulted" them.
Re: Unban Stella_Nokia
 

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=210&p=2734#p2734
 
Stella_Nokia's questions or opinions have not and they will not been
moderated. We really thank her for them and her contribution so far but,
in this part of the world we do not play and joke with people's
reputations. And we do not allow anyone to insult our country and its
people using arguments one can buy with 80cents in the corner just to
make some of her arguments to look stronger.
The members of this forum are welcomed but they are hosted in a
Greek forum which, first of all, has to protect some non
negotiable values. Stella was warned twice and she denied to understand
that we do not play games with our people's or our country's reputation
accepting cheap excuses about actors and how beautiful they look in US TV
screens concluding very clearly that she does not care if banned.

- - - - -
Interesting wiki on melting point of nanopowders:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melting-point_depression





Re: [Vo]:Suppose the DoE were testing a device instead of the Greek Min. of Energy

2011-07-07 Thread Rich Murray
If I had been an ideological skeptic, certain all CF claims were
bogus, erroneous, delusional or fraudulent, I would have been much
quicker to see the obvious unproven aspects of the January 14 Rossi
demo, and the consistent pattern of unproven claims in all the demos
since.  (I've always been ready to accept that CF or LENR is real.)

The blaring announcements of Defkalion fit this pattern rather well.

House of cards processes are notable in history.

The null hypothesis so far has not been falsified by facts...



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:01 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote:


>
> That would seem to suggest that Defkalion will probably be able to pay
> salary & utility bills through the end of the year... at least through
> October. ;-)
>

I don't expect to see any IPOs any time soon.  :-)


>
> * * * *
>
> BTW: The vortex-l Eskimo server is experiencing technical
> difficulties. I gather the main person in charge of maintaining the
> servers is on vacation. It may be a while before things are back to
> normal. I've noticed that I have to send messages four or five times
> before one finally gets through.


That would be Carl.  He's kinda filling in.  Here's a post from the
EskimoNorthUsers Yahoo group from Tuesday:

Today the mail server crashed, and the web server crashed. The mail server
is
now back online, however the web server really bit the dust this time. The
cpu
in it died. I have replaced the motherboard and cpu, with one that has two
cpu's on it. They are both 300Mhz, instead of 400mhz, but there is two of
them
instead of one. Hopefully they can handle the load for now because it's all
I
have for spares until Robert gets out of Prison. I should have the web
server
back up within a few hours.

-Carl Dinse



Presently Carl says he doesn't see a problem while other users are
disagreeing.  There is, however, a problem.

T


Re: [Vo]:Suppose the DoE were testing a device instead of the Greek Min. of Energy

2011-07-07 Thread Joshua Cude
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> There is not the slightest chance the government will make a mistake
> measuring 450 W in and 20,000 W out. No engineer or scientists on planet
> earth could make a mistake on that scale.
>

Perhaps not, but if it's true, any engineer or scientist on the planet would
not stop there. They would immediately take the 20 kW out, and use it to
generate the 450 W in. Then they would have infinite gain, and a completely
isolated device generating energy that would not require any expertise to
evaluate it. You said this was trivial. The fact that do something
difficult, which so far has failed to convince the public, but neglect to do
something trivial which could not fail to convince the public leaves a lot
of people skeptical.


> It seems to me this is exactly what skeptics have been demanding of cold
> fusion all these years.


It's not even what you have been asking for: an isolated device that stays
warmer than its surroundings for a really long time.

What more do these people want?!?


An isolated device, please. No input. At all.


Re: [Vo]:Suppose the DoE were testing a device instead of the Greek Min. of Energy

2011-07-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd's response strikes me as a lot of verbiage the obscures the point 
about these tests. I do not think there is any chance the Minister will 
allow people to blatantly lie about what his Ministry is doing. More to 
the point --


Defkalion says the government will issue reports and a license to sell 
the machines. The reports have to be made public, as a matter of law. 
The government is supposedly testing the device to be sure the excess 
heat is real, and in a different set of tests, to be sure the machines 
are safe.


So if the reports are forthcoming, and they confirm the claims, we will 
know that Defkalion is telling the truth.


If the reports never come out, or if the reports say "there is no excess 
heat" we will know that Defkalion is lying.


I do not think there is any chance the Greek government will conspire 
with Defkalion in fraud or in some sort of gigantic joke. We can rule 
that out. There is not the slightest chance the government will make a 
mistake measuring 450 W in and 20,000 W out. No engineer or scientists 
on planet earth could make a mistake on that scale.


It seems to me this is exactly what skeptics have been demanding of cold 
fusion all these years. This will give us a straightforward yes or no 
answer in a few months. I do not understand why skeptics are complaining 
about this, but several of them are, in private e-mail messages to me. 
What more do these people want?!? They are saying the Greek government 
is too slow or or you can't trust EU engineers to measure the difference 
between 450 W and 20,000 W. That's unreasonable.


- Jed



RE: [Vo]:Analysis of e-Cat test by E. Storms

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Iverson
Damon:
 
What do you mean by this statement???
 
"Water at 100 C does not boil and magically get 0.1 degree hotter as steam. 
What were they
thinking?"
 
The temperature of steam can be anywhere from boiling point on up to hundreds 
of degrees... it all
depends on pressure.

-Mark

  _  

From: Damon Craig [mailto:decra...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:58 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of e-Cat test by E. Storms


E-cats Have No Hair
 
 
Here is my challenge to the rest of you. I will be looking for evidence myself:-

 

What evidence exists that water does not rise in the chimney and weep or 
splatter into the exit
tube?

 

So far we seem to only have the assurance of our intrepid Phd's operating 
outside of the domain of
their expertise. This obtained: 

 

1) Misapplication of a humidity probe which returned meaningless results. "Not 
even wrong", in the
words of Wolfgang Pauli.

 

2) Invalid interpretation of a thermometer reading. 

 

The simple explanation is that liquid water simply overflows out the exit. 

 

Interpreting the thermometer reading of 100.1 C as an indication that the 
chimney contained water in
the gaseous phase, no matter how wet, is an error. It takes only a one foot 
head of water to raise
the boiling point of water to 101 C. As well, 0.1 C is less than half the error 
I have seen in
specifications for commercial probes in ideal conditions.

 

Water at 100 C does not boil and magically get 0.1 degree hotter as steam. What 
were they thinking? 

 

I have no idea. But we did get treated to Phd's experimenting and reporting 
outside their domain of
experience. If I am mistaken and one of them is experienced at 
Calorimetry---well, that person might
have some explaining to do.

 





Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Terry:

> The story is that they are funded by expat Greeks living in Canada to the
> tune of €400M.  The funds are allegedly committed but the actual status is
> not public, AFAIK.  They have been approached with offers of more funding;
> but, they have smiled and said "no thanks".

That would seem to suggest that Defkalion will probably be able to pay
salary & utility bills through the end of the year... at least through
October. ;-)

* * * *

BTW: The vortex-l Eskimo server is experiencing technical
difficulties. I gather the main person in charge of maintaining the
servers is on vacation. It may be a while before things are back to
normal. I've noticed that I have to send messages four or five times
before one finally gets through.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:30 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote:


>
> Does anyone else have any thoughts on the current status of
> Defkalion's piggy bank?


The story is that they are funded by expat Greeks living in Canada to the
tune of €400M.  The funds are allegedly committed but the actual status is
not public, AFAIK.  They have been approached with offers of more funding;
but, they have smiled and said "no thanks".

T


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Rock_nj
Jed.  Time will tell.  I sincerely hope I am wrong with my cynical view of
the way Rossi and Defka​lion are doing things.  I have been waiting as long
as everyone to see a cold fusion related product reach the marketplace.  We
need it now more than ever with oil prices over $100 barrel and peak oil
looming in the not too distant future.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

>  Rock_nj  wrote:
>
> Exactly the way "free energy" inventor (scammer) Dennis Lee raised money,
>> by selling dealerships.  Why would Defka​lion need to sell dealerships to
>> raise money if they have such a blockbuster energy product?  This thing is
>> really starting to smell bad.
>
>
> This is also exactly the way a legitimate company sells machines that
> require maintenance and regular servicing, such as air conditioners, boilers
> and automobiles. Do you expect them to set up direct dealerships and support
> staff in every city?
>
> Rock_nj has a damned-if-they-do, damned-if-they don't attitude. Defkalion
> is looking for OEM and dealerships. This is what anyone in their business
> would do. They have also set up a web site and they are holding press
> conferences. Again, any legitimate business would do this. Yes, this is also
> what a scammer does. You can make a long list of things that scammers and
> real businesses have in common. Every time Defkalion does something on the
> list, you can point to that as evidence that they are not legitimate. This
> is illogical and it proves nothing either way.
>
> - Jed
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Terry Sez:

> Can I borrow $58M?

Well... according to my unorthodox "Witch Doctor" source, Rossi &
Associates are still in need of a lot of cash in order to finish basic
R&D. Despite certain misgivings already expressed here it seems to me
that offering up dealerships might be a reasonable/legitimate way of
drumming up a few credits here and there. Alas, I wish I knew if
Defkalion really is cash strapped. I'm inclined to assume they are.

Of course, all of the above is nothing more than highly speculative
ramblings on my part - largely based on "the Doctor's" alleged
assessment of Rossi. I didn't really ask "the Doctor" specifically
about the status of Defkalion.

Does anyone else have any thoughts on the current status of
Defkalion's piggy bank?

Inquiring Minds want to know. ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Rock_nj  wrote:

Exactly the way "free energy" inventor (scammer) Dennis Lee raised money, by
> selling dealerships.  Why would Defka​lion need to sell dealerships to raise
> money if they have such a blockbuster energy product?  This thing is really
> starting to smell bad.


This is also exactly the way a legitimate company sells machines that
require maintenance and regular servicing, such as air conditioners, boilers
and automobiles. Do you expect them to set up direct dealerships and support
staff in every city?

Rock_nj has a damned-if-they-do, damned-if-they don't attitude. Defkalion is
looking for OEM and dealerships. This is what anyone in their business would
do. They have also set up a web site and they are holding press conferences.
Again, any legitimate business would do this. Yes, this is also what a
scammer does. You can make a long list of things that scammers and real
businesses have in common. Every time Defkalion does something on the list,
you can point to that as evidence that they are not legitimate. This is
illogical and it proves nothing either way.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 08:54 AM 7/7/2011, Rock_nj wrote:
Exactly the way "free energy"Â inventor 
(scammer)Â Dennis Lee raised money, by selling 
dealerships.  Why would Defka​lion need to 
sell dealerships to raise money if they have 
such a blockbuster energy product?  This thing 
is really starting to smell bad.


This is nothing either way. Defkalion might even 
be incomplete in their own testing, but they are 
looking ahead to success. Or they know very well 
what they have, and they are handling this as 
described. Nothing about this announcement 
indicates that they "need to raise money." They 
are responding to inquiries. What would you have them say, "No, go away!"???


Even if they have nothing, signing an agreement 
for rights would not be fraud. BlackLight Power 
has signed agreements for rights or sales. There 
is no fraud unless special conditions arise. 
Including actual payment. The agreement to 
purchase rights, the agreement to sell rights, 
doesn't establish payment. And payment might be 
explicitly stated as non-refundable or as refundable under certain conditions.


It's all speculation. What I see in the comment 
above is conclusions based on belief in bogosity.


I'm more interested in what they claim about web 
hits and numbers of companies inquiring. I'm not 
surprised. But that claim is not authoritative, 
it could be exaggerated, or not. 



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Rock_nj
Exactly the way "free energy" inventor (scammer) Dennis Lee raised money, by
selling dealerships.  Why would Defka​lion need to sell dealerships to raise
money if they have such a blockbuster energy product?  This thing is really
starting to smell bad.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Terry Blanton  wrote:

> July 6th, 2011
> Dear interested party,
> You have received this email because you have shown an initial interest for
> commercial involvement with our company and our products based on Andrea
> Rossi’s
> e-Cat invention (exothermic reaction between Hydrogen and Nickel).
> Many have signed non disclosure agreements with us and others are in the
> process of
> doing so. We offer you the possibility to meet with us prior to our public
> announcement that we accept international expressions of interest through
> our
> website as of September 2011.
> As such, this letter will update you on our current status, and provide you
> with a
> clearer understanding of the structure with which we are proceeding for all
> international partnerships. As many of you know, the manner is the same
> globally.
> Regarding exclusivity, having received expressions of interest from 63
> countries and
> more than 850 companies, we decided to change our non-exclusivity approach
> so that
> due diligence and selection of multiple partners in any given country is
> the
> responsibility off the country rights holder. As such, we will only sign
> agreements with
> one company per country. Any additional factories will pass through this
> partner.
> --- ---
> Regarding our international sales approach, it is as follows:
>  We sell the rights to manufacture our products exclusively to one company
> for
> a given country at a fixed royalty price of 40.5 million Euros per factory
> producing 300,000 units annually. Within this price, we will:
> o Provide the blueprints to establish the factory according to our
> international standardized plans, including all details for the machinery
> / software / technical know-how used in the factory.
> o Provide transfer-of-knowledge (production, technical, after sales,
> maintenance) both in Greece as well as on location
>  Additional royalties are paid to us for each product sold
>  We sell and deliver the industrial secret as a component to the final
> product in
> a black box, plug-and-play module.
>  Local company partnerships, marketing, points of sales, technical support
> remains the responsibility of the country rights holder.
>  If additional factories need to be built, the same principles remain.
>  Our business and pricing is structured to create lucrative win-win
> opportunities
> for all.
>
> Regarding time-line and milestones for those interested to proceed in
> talks:
>  Initial meeting in Athens during July and August (except 14-20 July and
> 10-20
> August) to discuss and sign preliminary expression of interest contract,
> whereby the opportunity to secure the exclusive rights will be given.
>  Meeting in our factory during October to inspect and verify kW units
>  Meeting in our factory during December to inspect and verify MW units
> --- ---
> Regarding next steps, and based on the information provided herein, if you
> see
> opportunities that match your company’s capabilities, and if you believe
> your company
> qualifies to proceed with further talks, we welcome your reply to this
> email
> accordingly in order to:
>  Signing of a non disclosure confidentiality agreement sent by us upon
> request
>  Secure a date for a meeting in Athens during July or August
> The abovementioned initial meeting in our offices here in Athens should not
> last more
> than 3-5 hours. Appointments will be set according to availability. As
> mentioned
> above, these meetings will take place during July (excluding above dates).
> --- ---
> Regarding factory specs, below is some basic information regarding the
> overview of
> the factory requirements according to our standards. Many of you will have
> already
> seen these figures; nothing has changed:
> Larger and smaller factories can be negotiated according to markets. Basic
> aspects of
> each factory producing 300,000 units annually (kW and MW product ranges)
> are:
>  12,000m2 space (maximum height of 14 meters for half of the allocated
> space)
>  IT to monitor production line, 1st level support and distribution
> channels
> Assembly of products will include the following activities:
>  Build-up of final product (electronics, heat management, etc)
>  Assembly of reactors (purchased from Defkalion)
>  Quality Control
>  Total Quality Management
>  Environmental Control
>  Stress Tests
>  Functional Tests of end products
>  Recharging of units
>  Recycling procedures
>
> Factory Special Conditions:
>  Clear air similar to pharmaceutical industry standards
>  Access to constant flow of water
>  Heat management of waste heat during tests of modules (this heat energy
> could also be used to run the factory’s energy needs 

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
Can I borrow $58M?

T


[Vo]:Defkalion Offers Dealerships

2011-07-07 Thread Terry Blanton
July 6th, 2011
Dear interested party,
You have received this email because you have shown an initial interest for
commercial involvement with our company and our products based on Andrea
Rossi’s
e-Cat invention (exothermic reaction between Hydrogen and Nickel).
Many have signed non disclosure agreements with us and others are in the
process of
doing so. We offer you the possibility to meet with us prior to our public
announcement that we accept international expressions of interest through
our
website as of September 2011.
As such, this letter will update you on our current status, and provide you
with a
clearer understanding of the structure with which we are proceeding for all
international partnerships. As many of you know, the manner is the same
globally.
Regarding exclusivity, having received expressions of interest from 63
countries and
more than 850 companies, we decided to change our non-exclusivity approach
so that
due diligence and selection of multiple partners in any given country is the
responsibility off the country rights holder. As such, we will only sign
agreements with
one company per country. Any additional factories will pass through this
partner.
--- ---
Regarding our international sales approach, it is as follows:
 We sell the rights to manufacture our products exclusively to one company
for
a given country at a fixed royalty price of 40.5 million Euros per factory
producing 300,000 units annually. Within this price, we will:
o Provide the blueprints to establish the factory according to our
international standardized plans, including all details for the machinery
/ software / technical know-how used in the factory.
o Provide transfer-of-knowledge (production, technical, after sales,
maintenance) both in Greece as well as on location
 Additional royalties are paid to us for each product sold
 We sell and deliver the industrial secret as a component to the final
product in
a black box, plug-and-play module.
 Local company partnerships, marketing, points of sales, technical support
remains the responsibility of the country rights holder.
 If additional factories need to be built, the same principles remain.
 Our business and pricing is structured to create lucrative win-win
opportunities
for all.

Regarding time-line and milestones for those interested to proceed in talks:
 Initial meeting in Athens during July and August (except 14-20 July and
10-20
August) to discuss and sign preliminary expression of interest contract,
whereby the opportunity to secure the exclusive rights will be given.
 Meeting in our factory during October to inspect and verify kW units
 Meeting in our factory during December to inspect and verify MW units
--- ---
Regarding next steps, and based on the information provided herein, if you
see
opportunities that match your company’s capabilities, and if you believe
your company
qualifies to proceed with further talks, we welcome your reply to this email
accordingly in order to:
 Signing of a non disclosure confidentiality agreement sent by us upon
request
 Secure a date for a meeting in Athens during July or August
The abovementioned initial meeting in our offices here in Athens should not
last more
than 3-5 hours. Appointments will be set according to availability. As
mentioned
above, these meetings will take place during July (excluding above dates).
--- ---
Regarding factory specs, below is some basic information regarding the
overview of
the factory requirements according to our standards. Many of you will have
already
seen these figures; nothing has changed:
Larger and smaller factories can be negotiated according to markets. Basic
aspects of
each factory producing 300,000 units annually (kW and MW product ranges)
are:
 12,000m2 space (maximum height of 14 meters for half of the allocated
space)
 IT to monitor production line, 1st level support and distribution channels
Assembly of products will include the following activities:
 Build-up of final product (electronics, heat management, etc)
 Assembly of reactors (purchased from Defkalion)
 Quality Control
 Total Quality Management
 Environmental Control
 Stress Tests
 Functional Tests of end products
 Recharging of units
 Recycling procedures

Factory Special Conditions:
 Clear air similar to pharmaceutical industry standards
 Access to constant flow of water
 Heat management of waste heat during tests of modules (this heat energy
could also be used to run the factory’s energy needs with third party
technology)
--- ---
Regarding R&D, it is also the case that some of you seek partnerships in the
field of
R&D. Such interest is seen favorably, but will be dealt with under
case-by-case
assessment following a detailed expression of interest. Please note that
such talks will
take place after October 2011.
--- ---
We would like to reiterate that this communication is made and provided to
you prior
to our international announcement in light of your early participation in
this exciting
endeavor.

Re: [Vo]:Analysis of e-Cat test by E. Storms

2011-07-07 Thread Damon Craig
I Wrote "It takes only a one foot head of water to raise the boiling point
of water to 101 C."

I forgot to include the observation that liquid water would build-up in the
exit hose. With the hose exist above floor level a head of water would
obtain rendering a 101.1 reading completely meaningless.

Also, the Belognia Italy civic center seems to lie only about 56 feet above
sea level, so that's a non-issue, though I don't believe anyone bothered to
take a barometric reading to see how ambient pressure could make a
difference in the boiling point.


Re: [Vo]:Analysis of e-Cat test by E. Storms

2011-07-07 Thread Damon Craig
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Terry Blanton  wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Joshua Cude  wrote:
>
> > Drop a stone into a pond to prove that this is wrong. Or check out a
> > cool-mist humidifier. Turbulent boiling water also produces liquid
> droplets
> > that are carried into the air by the vapor.
> > Steam can be wet. Live with it.
>
>
> OMG Cude!  You are so full of it!  Have you ever studied any science?
>
> T
>
>
I have more physics than you will ever know and you have not a foot to stand
upon.


Re: [Vo]:Analysis of e-Cat test by E. Storms

2011-07-07 Thread Damon Craig
E-cats Have No Hair



Here is my challenge to the rest of you. I will be looking for evidence
myself:-

* *

*What evidence exists that water does not rise in the chimney and weep or
splatter into the exit tube?*



So far we seem to only have the assurance of our intrepid Phd's operating
outside of the domain of their expertise. This obtained:



1) Misapplication of a humidity probe which returned meaningless results.
"Not even wrong", in the words of Wolfgang Pauli.



2) Invalid interpretation of a thermometer reading.



The simple explanation is that liquid water simply overflows out the exit.



Interpreting the thermometer reading of 100.1 C as an indication that the
chimney contained water in the gaseous phase, no matter how wet, is an
error. It takes only a one foot head of water to raise the boiling point of
water to 101 C. As well, 0.1 C is less than half the error I have seen in
specifications for commercial probes in ideal conditions.



Water at 100 C does not boil and magically get 0.1 degree hotter as steam.
What were they thinking?



I have no idea. But we did get treated to Phd's experimenting and reporting
outside their domain of experience. If I am mistaken and one of them is
experienced at Calorimetry---well, that person might have some explaining to
do.