Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-03-03 Thread Samuel Rose
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Wayne Mackintosh
mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
 The Lilypond example @ http://wikisophia.org/wiki/Wikitex  is very COOL.

 What are your thoughts on the security issues of Wikitext -- i.e.would you
 install this on your wiki ;-). Also any thoughts on issues or what we might
 do to deal produce consistent output with the collections extension?


Going to be looking into wikitex myself soon, and will report back
here what I find re: security.


 Cheers
 Wayne

 --
 Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
 Director,
 International Centre for Open Education,
 Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
 Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
 Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org
 Mobile +64 21 2436 380
 User Page: http://wikieducator.org/User:Mackiwg
 Skype: WGMNZ1
 Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg




-- 
-- 
Sam Rose
Forward Foundation
Social Synergy
Tel:+1(517) 639-1552
Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451
skype: samuelrose
email: samuel.r...@gmail.com
http://socialsynergyweb.com
http://forwardfound.org
http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing
http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/
http://socialmediaclassroom.com
http://localfoodsystems.org
http://notanemployee.net
http://communitywiki.org
http://wikieducator.org

The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human
ambition. - Carl Sagan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups WikiEducator group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
wikieducator-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com


Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-26 Thread Joshua Gay
Hi,

I'm new to this list. My name is Joshua Gay and I work at www.ck12.org and I
also help run textbookrevolution.org. I am also user jgay on IRC.

When it comes to embedding scripting languages or media one approach worth
looking at is  modtex + wikitex by Peter Danenberg. Here is a link with some
examples: http://wikisophia.org/wiki/Wikitex -- My favorite example is of
Lillypond music annotation. What it returns is an image of sheet music as
well as a midi file.

Obviously there are limitations with this system and it might not provide a
complete solution, but form an implementation point of view, Peter has
addressed many security concerns in his design of modtex that are worth a
look. For those of you who lurk on IRC, Peter runs #wikitex and has username
klutometis :-)

Also, in terms of embedding videos, one thing at CK12 that we came across
when started allow the embedding of videos on our wiki (mediawiki) and our
FlexBook service is the issue that YouTube (and increasingly other video
sharing sites) often has advertisments tied to the video you stream.  There
are ways around this in the case of YouTube, but, it poses a general policy
issue that is non-technical (as it can effect any type of third-party
multimedia) and worth bringing up early on in the discussion. Just thought
I'd throw that out there.

Cheers,

-Josh

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Wayne Mackintosh 
mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Edward,

 BTW -- congrats on the progress with the open text book project. Well done!
 (Have been a little snowed under to get to the posts on the list :-(.)

 From a values perspective that sounds very reasonable.

 Personally I don't have the technical knowledge to assess any security
 related issued with embedding links to external code. This is way above my
 salary level ;-)

 That said -- I know that you will be able to provide us with valuable
 advise on the security issues -- have a chat with Jim. Lets see what we can
 do.

 Cheers
 Wayne




 On 26 February 2010 18:22, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am interested in embedding links to Python and Smalltalk software of
 considerable generality, including graphics, animations, and video,
 and then capturing videos for posting elsewhere.

 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 19:26, Wayne Mackintosh
 mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Everyone,
 
  In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement
  the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party sites
 (eg
  Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by
  the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy to take a
  community decision concerning on third party video.
 
  Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
  What is the best way for us to take this decision?
  Should we have a trial period to see how this works?
 
  We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
  list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks,
 before
  deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide
 some
  discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when
 it
  comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our
 community
  values.
 
  Discussion
 
  Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links
  to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy
  to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video
  and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider,
  most notably the essential freedoms.
 
  WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
  solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project.
 I've
  been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
  appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
  suggestions.
 
  Licensing.  We must be able to identify and search for appropriately
  licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content we embed
  adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural works. In
  practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which clearly
 tag
  their video content with the relevant copyright license as well as
  corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
  appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
  domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet
 this
  requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
  implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would
 not be
  able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
  content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of
 Creative
  Commons licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
  license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-25 Thread Edward Cherlin
I am interested in embedding links to Python and Smalltalk software of
considerable generality, including graphics, animations, and video,
and then capturing videos for posting elsewhere.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 19:26, Wayne Mackintosh
mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to implement
 the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party sites (eg
 Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted independently by
 the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy to take a
 community decision concerning on third party video.

 Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
 What is the best way for us to take this decision?
 Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 Discussion

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable links
 to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively easy
 to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital video
 and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to consider,
 most notably the essential freedoms.

 WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
 solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've
 been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
 appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
 suggestions.

 Licensing.  We must be able to identify and search for appropriately
 licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content we embed
 adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural works. In
 practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which clearly tag
 their video content with the relevant copyright license as well as
 corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
 appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
 domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet this
 requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
 implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not be
 able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
 content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of Creative
 Commons licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
 license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons search
 (http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
 appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
 Open file formats. This is a requirement to ensure that our content is
 stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open source
 software. In addition this means that source files should be available for
 download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a license for
 non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative work from our
 site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the Wikimedia
 Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video Format (flv)
 which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service for their
 registered users who also have an account with the Internet Archive
 (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility enables
 archiving of downloadable video files including the open file format (ogg
 Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to BlipTV
 could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
 educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
 purposes. However, this feature would not solve the problem of open file
 formats for the video uploaded by BlipTV users who do not register for the
 Internet Archive service.  Fortunately BlipTV provides the functionality to
 download the video files, even though these are generally supplied in the
 flv (proprietary file format). The open source FFmpeg project
 (http://www.ffmpeg.org/) provides tools to convert flv files into open file
 formats. Therefore, all WikiEducator would have access to free software
 tools for remixing source video, thus meeting the requirements of the free
 cultural works definition.

 Therefore the BlipTV hosting site would provide a service which aligns with
 our values. There are also Mediawiki wiki extensions available for embedding
 BlipTV video on WikiEducator pages.

 Pending a positive assessment of the stability and security of the BlipTV
 extensions for WikiEducator -- Would the community consider moving forward
 with providing 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-25 Thread Wayne Mackintosh
Hi Edward,

BTW -- congrats on the progress with the open text book project. Well done!
(Have been a little snowed under to get to the posts on the list :-(.)

From a values perspective that sounds very reasonable.

Personally I don't have the technical knowledge to assess any security
related issued with embedding links to external code. This is way above my
salary level ;-)

That said -- I know that you will be able to provide us with valuable advise
on the security issues -- have a chat with Jim. Lets see what we can do.

Cheers
Wayne



On 26 February 2010 18:22, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am interested in embedding links to Python and Smalltalk software of
 considerable generality, including graphics, animations, and video,
 and then capturing videos for posting elsewhere.

 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 19:26, Wayne Mackintosh
 mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Everyone,
 
  In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement
  the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party sites (eg
  Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted independently
 by
  the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy to take a
  community decision concerning on third party video.
 
  Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
  What is the best way for us to take this decision?
  Should we have a trial period to see how this works?
 
  We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
  list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks,
 before
  deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide
 some
  discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
  comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our
 community
  values.
 
  Discussion
 
  Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links
  to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy
  to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital video
  and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider,
  most notably the essential freedoms.
 
  WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
  solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project.
 I've
  been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
  appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
  suggestions.
 
  Licensing.  We must be able to identify and search for appropriately
  licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content we embed
  adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural works. In
  practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which clearly tag
  their video content with the relevant copyright license as well as
  corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
  appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
  domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet
 this
  requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
  implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not
 be
  able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
  content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of Creative
  Commons licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
  license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons
 search
  (http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
  appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
  Open file formats. This is a requirement to ensure that our content is
  stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open
 source
  software. In addition this means that source files should be available
 for
  download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a license for
  non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative work from our
  site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the
 Wikimedia
  Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video Format (flv)
  which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service for their
  registered users who also have an account with the Internet Archive
  (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility enables
  archiving of downloadable video files including the open file format (ogg
  Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to BlipTV
  could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
  educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
  purposes. However, this feature would not solve the problem of open file
  formats for the video uploaded by BlipTV users who do not register for
 the
  Internet Archive service.  Fortunately BlipTV provides the functionality
 to
  download the video files, even though these are 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-24 Thread gene aronin
Here is a humble additional opinion from newcomer Gene-loeb. I agree that we
should try it according to the suggestions of Wayne, Patricia and others. I
believe we need to stay with our systems of value ande which will simplify
things by having set parameters for choices which is, for inexperienced me a
big help. We need to keep up with these advances.
Thanks for the conscientiousness and caring of all of you.
gene

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh 
mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party
 sites (eg Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy
 to take a community decision concerning on third party video.

- Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
- What is the best way for us to take this decision?
- Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 *Discussion*

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider, most notably the essential freedoms.

 WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
 solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've
 been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
 appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
 suggestions.

- *Licensing.*  We must be able to identify and search for
appropriately licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content
we embed adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural
works. In practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which
clearly tag their video content with the relevant copyright license as well
as corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet this
requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not 
 be
able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of *Creative
Commons* licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons search
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
- *Open file formats. *This is a requirement to ensure that our content
is stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open
source software. In addition this means that source files should be
available for download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a
license for non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative 
 work
from our site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the
Wikimedia Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video
Format (flv) which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service
for their registered users who also have an account with the Internet
Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility
enables archiving of downloadable video files including the open file 
 format
(ogg Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to 
 BlipTV
could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
purposes. However, this feature would not solve the problem of open file
formats for the video uploaded by BlipTV users who do not register for the
Internet Archive service.  Fortunately BlipTV provides the functionality to
download the video files, even though these are generally supplied in the
flv (proprietary file format). The open source FFmpeg project (
http://www.ffmpeg.org/) provides tools to convert flv files into open
file formats. Therefore, all WikiEducator would have access to free 
 software
tools for remixing source video, thus meeting the requirements of the free

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-20 Thread elizabeth mbasu
Thanks Wayne. This idea would be especially useful for Sub-Sahara 
countries. More than 80% of learners may not access internet.The situation 
could be worse for primary and secondary schools.
Elizabeth


--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Wayne Mackintosh mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:


From: Wayne Mackintosh mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in 
their OER resources?
To: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 3:23 PM


Thanks Elizabeth,

Appreciate your vote.

You will see from my response to Alison that we're thinking about ways in which 
we would be able to provide offline versions of rich media, especially for 
learners who may not have access to the internet.

Cheers
Wayne


On 20 February 2010 03:05, elizabeth mbasu emb...@yahoo.com wrote:





Videos turn abstract concepts into real and contribute to constructive 
learning. I vote for incorporating links to suitable video sites.
Elizabeth

--- On Thu, 2/18/10, Mary lightst...@gmail.com wrote:


From: Mary lightst...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in 
their OER resources?
To: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, February 18, 2010, 3:39 PM





I would find embedding videos useful. they are such a strong teaching meduim. 
Blip tv sounds like a via solution from what I understood  of your explanation. 
I would vote to proceed with this worthy project.


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Hi Everyone,

In the past we've received requests from many community members to implement 
the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party sites (eg 
Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted independently by 
the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy to take a community 
decision concerning on third party video. 


Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
What is the best way for us to take this decision? 

Should we have a trial period to see how this works? 
We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this list.  
We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before deciding 
on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some discussion 
points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it comes to the 
values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community values. 

Discussion

Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable links to 
third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively easy to 
achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital video and our 
core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to consider, most notably 
the essential freedoms.

WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a 
solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've 
been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would 
appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and 
suggestions. 


Licensing.  We must be able to identify and search for appropriately licensed 
video content. This is to ensure that video content we embed adheres to the 
requirements of the definition of free cultural works. In practice this means 
we can only use video hosting sites which clearly tag their video content with 
the relevant copyright license as well as corresponding search functionality to 
identify resources which are appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, 
GFDL and the public domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) 
would not meet this requirement as their existing conditions of service would 
not enable the implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users 
would not be able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights 
reserved content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of 
Creative Commons licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by 
license. This would enable
 WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons search 
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify appropriately 
licensed video on BlipTV.

Open file formats. This is a requirement to ensure that our content is stored 
and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open source software. 
In addition this means that source files should be available for download. No 
WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a license for non-free software in 
order to remix and create a derivative work from our site. Most video sites 
(with the exception, for instance, of the Wikimedia Commons) encode video for 
web delivery using the Flash Video Format (flv) which is a proprietary file 
format. BlipTV provide a service for their registered users who also have an 
account with the Internet Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short 
this 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-19 Thread elizabeth mbasu
Videos turn abstract concepts into real and contribute to constructive 
learning. I vote for incorporating links to suitable video sites.
Elizabeth

--- On Thu, 2/18/10, Mary lightst...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Mary lightst...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in  
their OER resources?
To: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, February 18, 2010, 3:39 PM

I would find embedding videos useful. they are such a strong teaching meduim. 
Blip tv sounds like a via solution from what I understood  of your explanation. 
I would vote to proceed with this worthy project.


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Hi Everyone,

In the past we've received requests from many community members to implement 
the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party sites (eg 
Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted independently by 
the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy to take a community 
decision concerning on third party video. 


Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?What is the 
best way for us to take this decision? 
Should we have a trial period to see how this works? 
We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this list.  
We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before deciding 
on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some discussion 
points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it comes to the 
values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community values. 



Discussion

Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable links to 
third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively easy to 
achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital video and our 
core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to consider, most notably 
the essential freedoms.



WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a 
solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've 
been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would 
appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and 
suggestions. 


Licensing.  We must be able to identify and search for appropriately licensed 
video content. This is to ensure that video content we embed adheres to the 
requirements of the definition of free cultural works. In practice this means 
we can only use video hosting sites which clearly tag their video content with 
the relevant copyright license as well as corresponding search functionality to 
identify resources which are appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, 
GFDL and the public domain declaration),  Therefore,  Youtube (for example) 
would not meet this requirement as their existing conditions of service would 
not enable the implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users 
would not be able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights 
reserved content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of 
Creative Commons licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by 
license. This would enable
 WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons search 
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify appropriately 
licensed video on BlipTV.


Open file formats. This is a requirement to ensure that our content is stored 
and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open source software. 
In addition this means that source files should be available for download. No 
WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a license for non-free software in 
order to remix and create a derivative work from our site. Most video sites 
(with the exception, for instance, of the Wikimedia Commons) encode video for 
web delivery using the Flash Video Format (flv) which is a proprietary file 
format. BlipTV provide a service for their registered users who also have an 
account with the Internet Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short 
this facility enables archiving of downloadable video files including the open 
file format (ogg Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files 
to BlipTV could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for 
educators to download video in
 the formats of their choice for remix purposes. However, this feature would 
not solve the problem of open file formats for the video uploaded by BlipTV 
users who do not register for the Internet Archive service.  Fortunately BlipTV 
provides the functionality to download the video files, even though these are 
generally supplied in the flv (proprietary file format). The open source FFmpeg 
project (http://www.ffmpeg.org/) provides tools to convert flv files into open 
file formats. Therefore, all WikiEducator would have access to free software 
tools for remixing source 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-19 Thread Randy Fisher
I add my voice to the growing chorus smile

- Randy

PS. Barbara - do you want to open a dialogue up with that reference - Open
Video Alliance that you suggested?

- Randy

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM, elizabeth mbasu emb...@yahoo.com wrote:

  Videos turn abstract concepts into real and contribute to constructive
 learning. I vote for incorporating links to suitable video sites.
 Elizabeth

 --- On *Thu, 2/18/10, Mary lightst...@gmail.com* wrote:


 From: Mary lightst...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video
 in their OER resources?
 To: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
 Date: Thursday, February 18, 2010, 3:39 PM


 I would find embedding videos useful. they are such a strong teaching
 meduim. Blip tv sounds like a via solution from what I understood  of your
 explanation. I would vote to proceed with this worthy project.

 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh 
 mackintosh.wa...@gmail.comhttp://mc/compose?to=mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party
 sites (eg Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy
 to take a community decision concerning on third party video.

- Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
- What is the best way for us to take this decision?
- Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 *Discussion*

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider, most notably the essential freedoms.

 WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
 solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've
 been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
 appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
 suggestions.

- *Licensing.*  We must be able to identify and search for
appropriately licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content
we embed adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural
works. In practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which
clearly tag their video content with the relevant copyright license as 
 well
as corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet this
requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not 
 be
able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of *Creative
Commons* licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons 
 search
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
- *Open file formats. *This is a requirement to ensure that our
content is stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using
free/open source software. In addition this means that source files should
be available for download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a
license for non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative 
 work
from our site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the
Wikimedia Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video
Format (flv) which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service
for their registered users who also have an account with the Internet
Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility
enables archiving of downloadable video files including the open file 
 format
(ogg Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to 
 BlipTV
could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
purposes. However, this feature would not solve the problem of open file
formats for the video 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-19 Thread Barbara Dieu
PS. Barbara - do you want to open a dialogue up with that reference - Open
Video Alliance that you suggested?

What do you mean, Randy? Contact them and check whether they would be
interested in bringing their Open Video expertise to WE?
Is this of interest to the community?

B.



-- 
Barbara Dieu
http://barbaradieu.com
http://beespace.net

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups WikiEducator group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
wikieducator-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-19 Thread Randy Fisher
Hi Barbara,

Contact them - tell them about WikiEducator -  and ask them what their
interests are, and how it might be possible to work together   and/or
support each other.

- Randy

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Barbara Dieu beeonl...@gmail.com wrote:

 PS. Barbara - do you want to open a dialogue up with that reference - Open
 Video Alliance that you suggested?

 What do you mean, Randy? Contact them and check whether they would be
 interested in bringing their Open Video expertise to WE?
 Is this of interest to the community?

 B.




 --
 Barbara Dieu
 http://barbaradieu.com
 http://beespace.net

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups WikiEducator group.
 To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
 To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
 To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 wikieducator-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com




-- 
Open Education is a sustainable and renewable resource.


Randy Fisher, MA, OMD
Senior Consultant, Change  Transition Management, Intersol Group, Canada

Senior Consultant, Organization  Business Development
International Centre for Open Education / OER Foundation, New Zealand

Elected Member, WikiEducator Community Council, www.wikieducator.org
+1 613.722.5577 (EST)
Skype: wikirandy
Twitter: wikirandy

* Change / Transition Management, Integration  Performance
* Organization Design  Development
* Project Implementation  Stakeholder Engagement
* E-Learning, Online Collaboration  Learning Communities
* Coaching  Facilitation
* My Bio: http://www.communitybuildingexpert.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups WikiEducator group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
wikieducator-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-19 Thread Wayne Mackintosh
Hi Allison,

I think a trial period is sensible. We can see how this works, think
carefully about processes, procedures and pilot any templates that may be
required to support embedding video links in ways which align with our
community values. With this experience we would then be in a position to
think about a community workgroup to formulate guidelines or policy if
required.

My thinking is that we need to be very clear that we will start with a trial
period -- which means that we can adapt. modify or revert back to the
default position in good wiki tradition :-).

Excellent question regarding what we should do with rich media for print
versions. We've been a bit of thinking about this and have laid the
foundations for doing some interesting technical magic for the future.

When WE first specified the requirements for the development of our Wiki ==
pdf technology in collaboration with Pedia Press and the Wikimedia
foundation (
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikis_Go_Printable ) we
made sure that it would be possible to specify print specific behaviours for
Mediawiki templates.  So for example, we can exclude navigation templates
from printing or alternatively specify a different layout for the print
version. This would be useful for online interaction like multiple choice
questions with feedback for correct and incorrect answers. Online the
learner will click their choice and receive immediate feedback. In the print
version, we may want to print the answers and feedback at the end of the
chapter.

Similarly, if a learning resource contains rich media like a video, the
print version could indicate an activity for the learner to view, for
instance, Video No.1 on the CD provided with course materials  -- When a
print collection is compiled,  the WikiEducator/ Mediawiki software could
generate a master CDROM image with the correct numbering of the videos and
cross references. This CDROM could be duplicated locally and posted with the
print versions of the study guides. The vast majority of learners around the
world do not have reliable and/or affordable connectivity -- therefore this
technology is vital for widening access to open content. Technically this
would be possible, and we have established the foundations to move forward.
The development of this technology is on the OER Foundation roadmap --- the
missing piece is finding the funding for the software development work. That
said, its been my experience that all good projects get funded :-).

In the interim we could develop a Video template where the print version
will provide urls for the video downloads -- which is why its important for
us to ensure that educators / learners must have access to downloadable
versions of rich media.

Wow -- can you imagine the impact these technologies could have in widening
access to high quality learning materials, all available under free content
licenses :-)

Hey -- lets make the future happen.

Cheers
Wayne





On 20 February 2010 02:32, Alison Snieckus alison.sniec...@gmail.comwrote:

 Wayne,
 As Mary indicated, embedded videos are certainly an enhancement to the
 learning environment. Being able to directly connect to videos hosted
 elsewhere and to source and repurpose videos would be a wonderful addiition
 to WikiEducator's  platform.

 I vote to add the necessary technology so we can try this out. A trial
 period seems like a good idea.

 Just wondering, do we have a current solution for handling audio, video and
 screencasts in the print and offline versions of WE content? I think it's
 important to keep this need in mind when creating content, although I have
 to say I'm not completely up on the options here.

 Alison

 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh 
 mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party
 sites (eg Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy
 to take a community decision concerning on third party video.

- Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
- What is the best way for us to take this decision?
- Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 *Discussion*

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video and our 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-19 Thread Wayne Mackintosh
Thanks Elizabeth,

Appreciate your vote.

You will see from my response to Alison that we're thinking about ways in
which we would be able to provide offline versions of rich media, especially
for learners who may not have access to the internet.

Cheers
Wayne

On 20 February 2010 03:05, elizabeth mbasu emb...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Videos turn abstract concepts into real and contribute to constructive
 learning. I vote for incorporating links to suitable video sites.
 Elizabeth

 --- On *Thu, 2/18/10, Mary lightst...@gmail.com* wrote:


 From: Mary lightst...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video
 in their OER resources?
 To: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
 Date: Thursday, February 18, 2010, 3:39 PM


 I would find embedding videos useful. they are such a strong teaching
 meduim. Blip tv sounds like a via solution from what I understood  of your
 explanation. I would vote to proceed with this worthy project.

 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh 
 mackintosh.wa...@gmail.comhttp://mc/compose?to=mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party
 sites (eg Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy
 to take a community decision concerning on third party video.

- Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
- What is the best way for us to take this decision?
- Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 *Discussion*

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider, most notably the essential freedoms.

 WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
 solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've
 been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
 appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
 suggestions.

- *Licensing.*  We must be able to identify and search for
appropriately licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content
we embed adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural
works. In practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which
clearly tag their video content with the relevant copyright license as 
 well
as corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet this
requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not 
 be
able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of *Creative
Commons* licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons 
 search
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
- *Open file formats. *This is a requirement to ensure that our
content is stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using
free/open source software. In addition this means that source files should
be available for download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a
license for non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative 
 work
from our site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the
Wikimedia Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video
Format (flv) which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service
for their registered users who also have an account with the Internet
Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility
enables archiving of downloadable video files including the open file 
 format
(ogg Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to 
 BlipTV
could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
purposes. However, 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-18 Thread Mary
I would find embedding videos useful. they are such a strong teaching
meduim. Blip tv sounds like a via solution from what I understood  of your
explanation. I would vote to proceed with this worthy project.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh 
mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party
 sites (eg Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy
 to take a community decision concerning on third party video.

- Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
- What is the best way for us to take this decision?
- Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 *Discussion*

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider, most notably the essential freedoms.

 WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
 solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've
 been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
 appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
 suggestions.

- *Licensing.*  We must be able to identify and search for
appropriately licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content
we embed adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural
works. In practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which
clearly tag their video content with the relevant copyright license as well
as corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet this
requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not 
 be
able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of *Creative
Commons* licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons search
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
- *Open file formats. *This is a requirement to ensure that our content
is stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open
source software. In addition this means that source files should be
available for download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a
license for non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative 
 work
from our site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the
Wikimedia Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video
Format (flv) which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service
for their registered users who also have an account with the Internet
Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility
enables archiving of downloadable video files including the open file 
 format
(ogg Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to 
 BlipTV
could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
purposes. However, this feature would not solve the problem of open file
formats for the video uploaded by BlipTV users who do not register for the
Internet Archive service.  Fortunately BlipTV provides the functionality to
download the video files, even though these are generally supplied in the
flv (proprietary file format). The open source FFmpeg project (
http://www.ffmpeg.org/) provides tools to convert flv files into open
file formats. Therefore, all WikiEducator would have access to free 
 software
tools for remixing source video, thus meeting the requirements of the free
cultural works definition.

 Therefore the BlipTV hosting site would provide a service which aligns with
 our values. There are also Mediawiki wiki extensions available for embedding
 BlipTV video on WikiEducator 

Re: [WikiEducator] Do WikiEducator's want to embed links to video in their OER resources?

2010-02-18 Thread Patricia Schlicht
Hi Wayne,

I have been using blip.tv for quite some time and it works really well. I
know Nellie for sure and Gladys I am sure as well. I also use TipCam to
record on-screen instructions, if I want to get instructions across by
demonstrating them. The same applies to YouTube, I use them all the time.

Flexibility would be great to have, it enriches a learning environment and
adds to one's point at times.

We could use a Doodle Poll. I think it is www.doodle.com
You list your choices and people can enter their name and vote. It works
rather well.

I would have to check the licensing (smile!)

I also found this link with lots of open source applications, you might want
to take a look at. Maybe we could use some of these.

http://cogdogroo.wikispaces.com/StoryTools

Cheers,
Patricia

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Wayne Mackintosh 
mackintosh.wa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 In the past we've received requests from many community members to
 implement the functionality to embed links to video hosted on third party
 sites (eg Youtube, BlipTV Vimeo etc). Now that WikiEducator is hosted
 independently by the OER Foundation, we have more flexibility and autonomy
 to take a community decision concerning on third party video.

- Do WikiEducators want the ability to embed links to video clips?
- What is the best way for us to take this decision?
- Should we have a trial period to see how this works?

 We need and invite your feedback -- so please post your replies to this
 list.  We will consider all feedback posted over the next two weeks, before
 deciding on the next steps. Apology for the long email -- but I provide some
 discussion points below. Third party video is not a simple matter when it
 comes to the values and meaning of freedom as interpreted by our community
 values.

 *Discussion*

 Embedding video is not a simple question of turning a switch to enable
 links to third party hosted video. Technically speaking, this is relatively
 easy to achieve. However,  there are many issues associated with digital
 video and our core values of the WikiEducator project which we need to
 consider, most notably the essential freedoms.

 WE subscribe to the free cultural works definition and WE need to find a
 solution which aligns with what we believe as a community OER project. I've
 been sound boarding a few ideas with colleagues and friends and would
 appreciate your input and feedback on a few baseline requirements and
 suggestions.

- *Licensing.*  We must be able to identify and search for
appropriately licensed video content. This is to ensure that video content
we embed adheres to the requirements of the definition of free cultural
works. In practice this means we can only use video hosting sites which
clearly tag their video content with the relevant copyright license as well
as corresponding search functionality to identify resources which are
appropriately licensed (eg. CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL and the public
domain declaration), Therefore,  Youtube (for example) would not meet this
requirement as their existing conditions of service would not enable the
implementation of license tagging. Currently WIkiEducator users would not 
 be
able to differentiate openly licensed videos from all rights reserved
content. However, BlipTV allows users to choose from a number of *Creative
Commons* licenses to apply to their work, and videos are searchable by
license. This would enable WIkiEducators to use the Creative Commons search
(http://search.creativecommons.org/) facility to easily identify
appropriately licensed video on BlipTV.
- *Open file formats. *This is a requirement to ensure that our content
is stored and accessible in formats which can be edited using free/open
source software. In addition this means that source files should be
available for download. No WikiEducator should be forced to purchase a
license for non-free software in order to remix and create a derivative 
 work
from our site. Most video sites (with the exception, for instance, of the
Wikimedia Commons) encode video for web delivery using the Flash Video
Format (flv) which is a proprietary file format. BlipTV provide a service
for their registered users who also have an account with the Internet
Archive (http://blip.tv/prefs/archiveorg/ ). In short this facility
enables archiving of downloadable video files including the open file 
 format
(ogg Theora). Therefore, WikiEducator users who upload video files to 
 BlipTV
could register for the Internet Archive service making it easier for
educators to download video in the formats of their choice for remix
purposes. However, this feature would not solve the problem of open file
formats for the video uploaded by BlipTV users who do not register for the
Internet Archive service.  Fortunately BlipTV provides the functionality to
download the