from:"chris"

I also noticed strange numbers in the speed plans sometimes it would
line up with a plan that we offered sometimes it would seem to pick a down
from one plan and an upload that from a different plan.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Adair Winter 
wrote:

> That's interesting. so some lines show nothing for and down/up speed.
>  others shows some plan that we have. Is powercode just picking the user
> with the highest plan for the block and displaying that? hmm
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Cameron Crum  wrote:
>
>> Deployment is your service offerings to the blocks. Basically, what
>> blocks can you cover at what speeds and with what technology. Subscription
>> counts actual subscribers in tracts.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Mike Hammett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well then. That sucks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>>
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Chris Fabien" 
>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:11:11 PM
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>>
>>> Mike, I should have at least several hundred that actually have
>>> subscribers that powercode should have included in the CSV.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Mike Hammett >> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> How many blocks are your subscribers in?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> --
>>>> *From: *"Chris Fabien" 
>>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:06:48 PM
>>>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>>>
>>>> Powercode does not have a real coverage map. They do generate the
>>>> deployment .csv file, based upon the assumption of reporting any block in
>>>> which you have a customer as being deployed. That approach will definitely
>>>> generate incomplete results, but I'm seeing a way way worse problem.
>>>> Powercode was giving us 22 blocks reported on the deployment CSV, when I
>>>> did it by hand in GIS software, I have 841 blocks. Something seems to be
>>>> very broken. I just finished the analysis right now, I will be emailing
>>>> them shortly.
>>>>
>>>> If you guys are blindly dumping your Powercode deployment CSV into 477,
>>>> you really should check the data yourself somehow. I have talked to one
>>>> other powercode user who was seeing this problem. He actually had a mapping
>>>> background and helped me do the analysis in MapInfo.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Fabien
>>>> LakeNet LLC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Mike Hammett <

Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate

The first value in the deployment data is a census block ID. That file
reports your coverage area, and what technology and speeds offered on a
per-census block basis. There should be a LOT of census blocks in the list
if you have a large coverage area like most WISPs. How many lines do you
have in the deployment file compared to the 350 in the subscriber file?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Adair Winter 
wrote:

> Interesting. I think I understand the data that's in the files for the
> most part.  The deplyment data looks like info about plans what whatnot.
> and the subscriber info is the blocks/tracts covered.
> We have over 350 lines in the subscriber file.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Chris Fabien 
> wrote:
>
>> Powercode does not have a real coverage map. They do generate the
>> deployment .csv file, based upon the assumption of reporting any block in
>> which you have a customer as being deployed. That approach will definitely
>> generate incomplete results, but I'm seeing a way way worse problem.
>> Powercode was giving us 22 blocks reported on the deployment CSV, when I
>> did it by hand in GIS software, I have 841 blocks. Something seems to be
>> very broken. I just finished the analysis right now, I will be emailing
>> them shortly.
>>
>> If you guys are blindly dumping your Powercode deployment CSV into 477,
>> you really should check the data yourself somehow. I have talked to one
>> other powercode user who was seeing this problem. He actually had a mapping
>> background and helped me do the analysis in MapInfo.
>>
>> Chris Fabien
>> LakeNet LLC
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Mike Hammett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Does PowerCode have any way to calculate the deployment file?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>>
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Adair Winter" 
>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:52:10 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>>
>>>
>>> *shrug*
>>> When I do the export from powercode it dumps two .csv files.
>>> DeploymentData.csv and SubscriptionData.csv. Both of which I just load in
>>> to the fcc 477 site.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Hammett 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does Powercode do deployment or only subscriber?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> --
>>>> *From: *"Chris Fabien" 
>>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:46:44 AM
>>>> *Subject: *[WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>>>
>>>> Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from powercode in our
>>>> GIS software, we found it

Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate

Mike, I should have at least several hundred that actually have subscribers
that powercode should have included in the CSV.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> How many blocks are your subscribers in?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Chris Fabien" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:06:48 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>
> Powercode does not have a real coverage map. They do generate the
> deployment .csv file, based upon the assumption of reporting any block in
> which you have a customer as being deployed. That approach will definitely
> generate incomplete results, but I'm seeing a way way worse problem.
> Powercode was giving us 22 blocks reported on the deployment CSV, when I
> did it by hand in GIS software, I have 841 blocks. Something seems to be
> very broken. I just finished the analysis right now, I will be emailing
> them shortly.
>
> If you guys are blindly dumping your Powercode deployment CSV into 477,
> you really should check the data yourself somehow. I have talked to one
> other powercode user who was seeing this problem. He actually had a mapping
> background and helped me do the analysis in MapInfo.
>
> Chris Fabien
> LakeNet LLC
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Does PowerCode have any way to calculate the deployment file?
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>>
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>> *From: *"Adair Winter" 
>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:52:10 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>
>>
>> *shrug*
>> When I do the export from powercode it dumps two .csv files.
>> DeploymentData.csv and SubscriptionData.csv. Both of which I just load in
>> to the fcc 477 site.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Hammett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Does Powercode do deployment or only subscriber?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>>
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Chris Fabien" 
>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:46:44 AM
>>> *Subject: *[WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>>

Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate

Powercode does not have a real coverage map. They do generate the
deployment .csv file, based upon the assumption of reporting any block in
which you have a customer as being deployed. That approach will definitely
generate incomplete results, but I'm seeing a way way worse problem.
Powercode was giving us 22 blocks reported on the deployment CSV, when I
did it by hand in GIS software, I have 841 blocks. Something seems to be
very broken. I just finished the analysis right now, I will be emailing
them shortly.

If you guys are blindly dumping your Powercode deployment CSV into 477, you
really should check the data yourself somehow. I have talked to one other
powercode user who was seeing this problem. He actually had a mapping
background and helped me do the analysis in MapInfo.

Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC


On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> Does PowerCode have any way to calculate the deployment file?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Adair Winter" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:52:10 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>
>
> *shrug*
> When I do the export from powercode it dumps two .csv files.
> DeploymentData.csv and SubscriptionData.csv. Both of which I just load in
> to the fcc 477 site.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Does Powercode do deployment or only subscriber?
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>>
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>> *From: *"Chris Fabien" 
>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:46:44 AM
>> *Subject: *[WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
>>
>> Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from powercode in our GIS
>> software, we found it was grossly inaccurate, probably only has 10% of the
>> blocks in the file compared to ones where we have customers. Has anyone
>> else noticed this?
>>
>> We were previously not mapping the output and just blindly submitting
>> it bad idea... we were grossly under reporting our coverage.
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
> C: 806.231.7180
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate

Imported a shapefile of the census blocks and matched up the output from
powercode. We were getting like 20 blocks from powercode when we should
have several hundred...

On Aug 30, 2016 4:53 PM, "Kevin Sullivan" 
wrote:

How did you check it?



*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Chris Fabien
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 30, 2016 8:47 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate



Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from powercode in our GIS
software, we found it was grossly inaccurate, probably only has 10% of the
blocks in the file compared to ones where we have customers. Has anyone
else noticed this?



We were previously not mapping the output and just blindly submitting
it bad idea... we were grossly under reporting our coverage.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate

Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from powercode in our GIS
software, we found it was grossly inaccurate, probably only has 10% of the
blocks in the file compared to ones where we have customers. Has anyone
else noticed this?

We were previously not mapping the output and just blindly submitting
it bad idea... we were grossly under reporting our coverage.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear

2016-08-29 Thread Chris Ruschmann

I emailed them and they said they stopped sending them with mounts because
the default ones don’t work…



So I have an email in with the distributer trying to get some options for
mounting the things.



*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
*Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 11:19 AM
*To:* WISPA General List 
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear



I got no mount! Wtf ignitenet?



*From: * on behalf of Chris Ruschmann <
ch...@scsalaska.net>



*Gino Villarini*

President

Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

*Reply-To: *WISPA General List 
*Date: *Monday, August 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM
*To: *WISPA General List 
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear



Yeah, on our Beta Gear we were seeing 600Mpbs. I haven’t got the new sector
up to test as they apparently don’t ship them with mounts…



*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz
*Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2016 3:04 PM
*To:* WISPA General List 
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear



You had something not setup right.



*We have seen arguments about 600meg vs 800meg vs 1g type discussions.. but
if you were seeing 30... then you had something totally off...*



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


--

*From: *"Dan Parrish" 
*To: *"WISPA General List" 
*Sent: *Friday, August 26, 2016 5:55:01 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear

We've gotten some this week as well. Initial tests weren't too impressive,
but I'm sure I can improve the RF alignment. At -55 on both sides, I was
only able to pass about 30mbits/sec, which was much lower than I
anticipated. How is everyone else faring in their tests? Please include
RSSI and TCP performance if possible.

--danp

On 08/25/2016 03:13 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:

Just got these in, smaller than I thought they would be…



Sector on the left, CPE on the right. I’ll get them setup shortly.



___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear

2016-08-29 Thread Chris Ruschmann

Yeah, on our Beta Gear we were seeing 600Mpbs. I haven’t got the new sector
up to test as they apparently don’t ship them with mounts…



*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz
*Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2016 3:04 PM
*To:* WISPA General List 
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear



You had something not setup right.



*We have seen arguments about 600meg vs 800meg vs 1g type discussions.. but
if you were seeing 30... then you had something totally off...*



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


--

*From: *"Dan Parrish" 
*To: *"WISPA General List" 
*Sent: *Friday, August 26, 2016 5:55:01 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear

We've gotten some this week as well. Initial tests weren't too impressive,
but I'm sure I can improve the RF alignment. At -55 on both sides, I was
only able to pass about 30mbits/sec, which was much lower than I
anticipated. How is everyone else faring in their tests? Please include
RSSI and TCP performance if possible.

--danp


On 08/25/2016 03:13 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:

Just got these in, smaller than I thought they would be…



Sector on the left, CPE on the right. I’ll get them setup shortly.



___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear

2016-08-25 Thread Chris Ruschmann

I still have some from the beta.

On Aug 25, 2016 6:31 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> make sure you also got the Scopes !...
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Chris Ruschmann" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Thursday, August 25, 2016 5:13:01 PM
> *Subject: *[WISPA] 60 Ghz gear
>
> Just got these in, smaller than I thought they would be…
>
>
>
> Sector on the left, CPE on the right. I’ll get them setup shortly.
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] High-Rise Building Rooftop Grounding

2016-08-20 Thread Chris Fabien

We are quoting the installation of two 5ft tall Non-Pen mounts with some
small dish antennas as part of a security camera project. I am trying to
determine what is required by code for grounding these masts and the cat5
lines to the radios where they enter the rooftop mechanical building.

It is an older 10-story apartment tower. I did not pay very close attention
to grounding when I was on site, I do not believe there is any sort of
lightning rod system. There is an elevator mechanical room on the roof,
where we will be installing a small POE switch to power the APs. Hoping
someone on the list has done this before and can tell me what is required.

Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Anyone deployed RealChoiceTV yet?

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Fabien

Would like to discuss experience if you have we are considering.

Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Anyone sell ICOM IDAS radios/repeaters?

2016-07-26 Thread Chris Fabien

We are evaluating a couple different options for 2-way radios and would
like to get some info/pricing. Ive heard it discussed on this list before.
If any wispa members sell this please contact me off list.

Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DC UPS (and Solar?) Setup.

2016-07-14 Thread Chris Ruschmann

also, size your battery strings to be the same or larger than your load in
volts. down covering voltage uses less energy than up converting. so you
will lose efficiencies if you go that route.

example. running a 12 v battery bank using a netonix DC switch which will
up convert to 48v for the switch, then down covert to 24v for most gear
will yield you anywhere between 70-90% efficiency. thus making your battery
load that much less useful. Running a 48v bank will yield you 99-100%
efficiency. which will make sizing calculations easier for your run times.

On Thursday, July 14, 2016, Chris Ruschmann  wrote:

> if your interested in understanding the technology, then this site has a
> lot of information on solar and DC in general. check out the faq's they are
> worth the read.
> http://www.solar-electric.com/learning-center
>
> Air fibers use a lot of power in DC land. The biggest thing is
> understanding your load. Buy according to that. I spent about a year on a
> test site tinkering before I built my first production site. I have never
> had an outage. and I've gone 22 straight days with absolutely no sun on
> only batteries and no gensets. I'm in Alaska.
>
> use 24v solar panels if you have space. try and do as large of strings as
> possible. 48, 72, 96 Volts. We use midnight solar classic charge
> controllers. They are rock solid and work great.
>
> We use only AGM sealed batteries. My personal favorites are Full River.
>
> Fused netonix DC switches.
>
>
> typed this on my iPad...
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, July 14, 2016, Paul Hendry  > wrote:
>
>> Nice. How customisable is the charge/discharge side of this unit? Would
>> be interested to see if they can be used with LiFePO4 cells. Also, roughly
>> how much are these units?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> On 15/07/2016 12:33, Gino Villarini wrote:
>>
>> Just do use this and be done with all:
>>
>>
>> http://www.alpha.com/index.php/products-mobile/cable-tv-broadband-products/
>> item/2448vdc-cordex-psu-2
>>
>> On 7/14/16, 5:29 PM, "wireless-boun...@wispa.org on behalf of Duncan
>>
>>
>>
>> *Gino Villarini*
>> President
>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>
>> Scott" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >So historically we've been a mostly AC setup, but I'm trying to figure
>> >out a DC setup for some of our smaller sites, and hopefully a solar
>> >setup as well. I'm new to all of this though so I'm trying to see if
>> >anyone has any written guides or part lists. Basic goal is to power an
>> >airfiber or equivalent and A few Canopy or Ubnt APs.
>> >
>> >Here's what I've been looking at so far:
>> >
>> >48v DC power supply
>> >Traco TSP-BCMU360
>> >Packetflux Site monitor 2 base
>> >Packetflux SiteMonitor 6 Channel Switch Closure Input
>> >Neotonix DC switch
>> >
>> >This seems to work okay, the TSP-BCMU360 charges and monitors the
>> >battery and the Packetflux Sitemonitor provides a network connection to
>> >monitor the status.
>> >
>> >Issues so far:
>> >
>> >I'm running the site monitor off the BCMU, but this means that it's
>> >input power is 48v, I want to monitor the voltage of the battery, but
>> >that's just 12v and I don't think I can have different voltages plugged
>> >into the two inputs to the site monitor. Another option would be to have
>> >the site monitor powered off the batteries directly, but that seems
>> bad...
>> >
>> >Is the packetflux stuff the best solution for this, or is there another
>> >web enabling option? Seem pretty good so far, but I'm not even sure what
>> >the other options are.
>> >
>> >The other issue is I have no idea what I should be using for
>> >breaker/fuses for the equipment. A suggested list of DIN mountable stuff
>> >I should have would be super useful if someone has it on hand. Also who
>> >to order this stuff from.
>> >
>> >The other thing I would like to try is some kind of solar setup. Again
>> >it need to be monitored remotely. Power draw would be as low as I could
>> >manage. This is Oregon, so not lots of snow, but there are a lot of
>> >cloudy days. Packetflux makes several items that integrate with Morning
>> >Star controllers. It that a good way to go? Something like a TS-MPPT-30?
>> >
>> >Batteries are another thing. I'm also very curious if Lithium ion
>&

Re: [WISPA] DC UPS (and Solar?) Setup.

2016-07-14 Thread Chris Ruschmann

if your interested in understanding the technology, then this site has a
lot of information on solar and DC in general. check out the faq's they are
worth the read.
http://www.solar-electric.com/learning-center

Air fibers use a lot of power in DC land. The biggest thing is
understanding your load. Buy according to that. I spent about a year on a
test site tinkering before I built my first production site. I have never
had an outage. and I've gone 22 straight days with absolutely no sun on
only batteries and no gensets. I'm in Alaska.

use 24v solar panels if you have space. try and do as large of strings as
possible. 48, 72, 96 Volts. We use midnight solar classic charge
controllers. They are rock solid and work great.

We use only AGM sealed batteries. My personal favorites are Full River.

Fused netonix DC switches.


typed this on my iPad...




On Thursday, July 14, 2016, Paul Hendry 
wrote:

> Nice. How customisable is the charge/discharge side of this unit? Would be
> interested to see if they can be used with LiFePO4 cells. Also, roughly how
> much are these units?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Paul.
>
> On 15/07/2016 12:33, Gino Villarini wrote:
>
> Just do use this and be done with all:
>
> http://www.alpha.com/index.php/products-mobile/cable-tv-broadband-products/
> item/2448vdc-cordex-psu-2
>
> On 7/14/16, 5:29 PM, "wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>  on behalf of
> Duncan
>
>
>
> *Gino Villarini*
> President
> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>
> Scott" 
> 
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >So historically we've been a mostly AC setup, but I'm trying to figure
> >out a DC setup for some of our smaller sites, and hopefully a solar
> >setup as well. I'm new to all of this though so I'm trying to see if
> >anyone has any written guides or part lists. Basic goal is to power an
> >airfiber or equivalent and A few Canopy or Ubnt APs.
> >
> >Here's what I've been looking at so far:
> >
> >48v DC power supply
> >Traco TSP-BCMU360
> >Packetflux Site monitor 2 base
> >Packetflux SiteMonitor 6 Channel Switch Closure Input
> >Neotonix DC switch
> >
> >This seems to work okay, the TSP-BCMU360 charges and monitors the
> >battery and the Packetflux Sitemonitor provides a network connection to
> >monitor the status.
> >
> >Issues so far:
> >
> >I'm running the site monitor off the BCMU, but this means that it's
> >input power is 48v, I want to monitor the voltage of the battery, but
> >that's just 12v and I don't think I can have different voltages plugged
> >into the two inputs to the site monitor. Another option would be to have
> >the site monitor powered off the batteries directly, but that seems bad...
> >
> >Is the packetflux stuff the best solution for this, or is there another
> >web enabling option? Seem pretty good so far, but I'm not even sure what
> >the other options are.
> >
> >The other issue is I have no idea what I should be using for
> >breaker/fuses for the equipment. A suggested list of DIN mountable stuff
> >I should have would be super useful if someone has it on hand. Also who
> >to order this stuff from.
> >
> >The other thing I would like to try is some kind of solar setup. Again
> >it need to be monitored remotely. Power draw would be as low as I could
> >manage. This is Oregon, so not lots of snow, but there are a lot of
> >cloudy days. Packetflux makes several items that integrate with Morning
> >Star controllers. It that a good way to go? Something like a TS-MPPT-30?
> >
> >Batteries are another thing. I'm also very curious if Lithium ion
> >batteries are feasible yet. This would need a different charger but it
> >would save a TON of space and maybe even be cost effective given the
> >smaller enclosure size that would be possible.
> >
> >Then there is the issue of what solar panels to buy.
> >
> >If anyone has any thoughts, comments, links, documents, etc. I'd really
> >appreciate it.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Duncan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___
> >Wireless mailing list
> >Wireless@wispa.org 
> >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* , and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing listwirel...@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7640 / Virus Database: 4627/12616 - Release Date: 07/14/16
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Hendry
> Skyline Support - NZ NOC
>
> Skyline Networks NZ Ltd
>
> 13-17 Putaitai Street,
> Stoke,
> Nelson
> 7011
>
> Tel: 022 639 3328
>
> Email: paul.hen...@skyline-networks.com 
> 
>
> Web: http://www.skyline-networks.com
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If 
> you have received this email in error please noti

Re: [WISPA] Any IgniteNet MetroLinq customers out there

2016-06-21 Thread Chris Ruschmann

24VH is needed on the netonix, we had weird similar issues using standard
24v ports.
On Jun 20, 2016 9:03 PM, "Judd Dare"  wrote:

> Try a different power brick.
> On Jun 20, 2016 9:47 PM, "Chadwick Wachs"  wrote:
>
>> One end is brick (the end that is having issues) and the other end is off
>> a Netonix.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Chris Ruschmann 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How are you powering them? Power brick or switch?
>>> On Jun 20, 2016 7:35 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there the only two radios you have ? maybe there is a physical
>>> hardware issue with one of the radios..
>>>
>>> we have seen something similar with on another link we were working on
>>> for another WISP.  No conclusions yet, but one radio is definitely doing
>>> hokey stuff...They have spares, will be trying another pair (the radios
>>> linked up on the bench, but would not link nor go thru the alignment
>>> process on a 400m link).
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Chadwick Wachs" 
>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>>> *Sent: *Monday, June 20, 2016 12:47:43 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Any IgniteNet MetroLinq customers out there
>>>
>>> Update to all on this.  We are running MCS1, the latest public firmware
>>> and contacted Ignite support. They are responsive.  We did get the 60 GHz
>>> radios to link up once - for about 30 minutes. Then, the 60 GHz radio on
>>> the client end died. Can't open the 60 GHz aiming tool and the dashboard
>>> acts like the radio is off.
>>> We have been through a number of reboots to get the 60 GHz radio to wake
>>> back up. No dice. Ignite is aware of the issue, acknowledges I am not the
>>> only one who has seen this but so far no solutions.  Last night, the 5 GHz
>>> link between these two radios died at 3am (not a production link).  We lost
>>> all wireless and ethernet access to the client radio until a reboot.
>>>
>>> After rebooting, the 5 GHz would not pass any traffic until the 60 GHz
>>> radios were turned off in the interface on both ends.  Both ends are on big
>>> UPSs so I don't think power is the issue, I think there is buggy firmware.
>>> While I have *some* time to deal with testing firmware and trouble
>>> shooting, I don't have unlimited time to do this.
>>>
>>> It is back running on 5 GHz. It is aimed well - we did get a solid 60
>>> GHz signal but we never got the 60's to link back up after one mysteriously
>>> stopped.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Rob Genovesi 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aiming takes patience, the scopes aren't perfect but a huge help.  We
>>>> found that turning off auto MCS and using fixed lower rate helped a
>>>> lot.  Make sure you have the newest firmware, I believe there are more
>>>> updates coming out soon as well.  IgniteNet support was responsive and
>>>> very helpful when we had questions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
>>>> 650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Chadwick Wachs 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I have been trying for a couple days to get a new PTP60-35 60 GHz
>>>> link up
>>>> > and running with no luck. Looking for some help / suggestions from
>>>> anyone
>>>> > who has been successful getting links up. The 5 GHz link is working
>>>> but 60
>>>> > never trains up. I bought the spotting scopes and each end is dead
>>>> center.
>>>> > Good old fashioned up/down/left/right aiming methods do not seem to
>>>> work
>>>> > either and IgniteNet is lacking in the support department.
>>>> >
>>>> > Anyone want to contact me off list if you have any suggestions on what
>>>> > worked for you?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Chad
>>>> >
>>>> > ___
&

Re: [WISPA] Any IgniteNet MetroLinq customers out there

2016-06-20 Thread Chris Ruschmann

How are you powering them? Power brick or switch?
On Jun 20, 2016 7:35 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

Are there the only two radios you have ? maybe there is a physical hardware
issue with one of the radios..

we have seen something similar with on another link we were working on for
another WISP.  No conclusions yet, but one radio is definitely doing hokey
stuff...They have spares, will be trying another pair (the radios linked up
on the bench, but would not link nor go thru the alignment process on a
400m link).

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

--

*From: *"Chadwick Wachs" 
*To: *"WISPA General List" 
*Sent: *Monday, June 20, 2016 12:47:43 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Any IgniteNet MetroLinq customers out there

Update to all on this.  We are running MCS1, the latest public firmware and
contacted Ignite support. They are responsive.  We did get the 60 GHz
radios to link up once - for about 30 minutes. Then, the 60 GHz radio on
the client end died. Can't open the 60 GHz aiming tool and the dashboard
acts like the radio is off.
We have been through a number of reboots to get the 60 GHz radio to wake
back up. No dice. Ignite is aware of the issue, acknowledges I am not the
only one who has seen this but so far no solutions.  Last night, the 5 GHz
link between these two radios died at 3am (not a production link).  We lost
all wireless and ethernet access to the client radio until a reboot.

After rebooting, the 5 GHz would not pass any traffic until the 60 GHz
radios were turned off in the interface on both ends.  Both ends are on big
UPSs so I don't think power is the issue, I think there is buggy firmware.
While I have *some* time to deal with testing firmware and trouble
shooting, I don't have unlimited time to do this.

It is back running on 5 GHz. It is aimed well - we did get a solid 60 GHz
signal but we never got the 60's to link back up after one mysteriously
stopped.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Rob Genovesi 
wrote:

> Aiming takes patience, the scopes aren't perfect but a huge help.  We
> found that turning off auto MCS and using fixed lower rate helped a
> lot.  Make sure you have the newest firmware, I believe there are more
> updates coming out soon as well.  IgniteNet support was responsive and
> very helpful when we had questions.
>
>
> Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
> 650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Chadwick Wachs 
> wrote:
> > I have been trying for a couple days to get a new PTP60-35 60 GHz link up
> > and running with no luck. Looking for some help / suggestions from anyone
> > who has been successful getting links up. The 5 GHz link is working but
> 60
> > never trains up. I bought the spotting scopes and each end is dead
> center.
> > Good old fashioned up/down/left/right aiming methods do not seem to work
> > either and IgniteNet is lacking in the support department.
> >
> > Anyone want to contact me off list if you have any suggestions on what
> > worked for you?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chad
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>

-- 

AU Wireless (Golden Wireless)

www.AUwireless.net 

Facebook  |
@auwirelessnet 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-17 Thread Chris Ruschmann

We all had to sign an NDA. So I'll let the baicells guys answer that one.
On Jun 17, 2016 9:05 PM,  wrote:

Whats the pricing like?

On Jun 17, 2016, at 19:12, Matt Hoppes 
wrote:

https://www.facebook.com/thewirelessninja/videos/1017353051688688/

On Jun 17, 2016, at 21:07, Christian Palecek 
wrote:

Ours*  brain fart.

We are deploying in one of our most difficult nlos areas, and another in a
small town center so we'll have a variety of testing.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Christian Palecek 
Date: 6/17/16 7:02 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

We'll have ares up pretty quick, don't have a SU yet though.  Only getting
one I guess.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Chris Ruschmann 
Date: 6/17/16 3:58 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

I should have mine deployed next week as well. Just received the gear today.
On Jun 17, 2016 1:11 PM, "Mike Francis"  wrote:

> By: Douglas Adams
> "Man [has] always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins
> because he had achieved so much-the wheel, New York, wars and so on-while
> all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good
> time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far
> more intelligent than man-for precisely the same reason."
>
> John Michael Francis II
> JMF Solutions, Inc
> Wavefly Technologies
> Internet - Voip - Cloud
> 251-517-5069
> http://jmfsolutions.net
> http://wavefly.com
>
> On 6/17/2016 4:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Anxiously awaiting your results...and a quote!
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Mike Francis 
> wrote:
>
>> We received our first shipment of gear this week and plan on beginning
>> deployment next week. Will let you guys know. We are doing a mix-use
>> test roll out with a gov cyber task force, so it will be well documented.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> John Michael Francis II
>> JMF Solutions, Inc
>> Wavefly Technologies
>> Internet - Voip - Cloud
>> 251-517-5069
>> http://jmfsolutions.net
>> http://wavefly.com
>>
>> On 6/17/2016 3:05 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> > I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not speak
>> > yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth come very
>> > soon.
>> >
>> > On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >> Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed?  Care
>> >> to comment on/off list?
>> >>
>> >> Josh Luthman
>> >> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >> 1100 Wayne St
>> >> Suite 1337
>> >> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Wireless mailing list
>> >> Wireless@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >>
>> > ___
>> > Wireless mailing list
>> > Wireless@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing 
> listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> ___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-17 Thread Chris Ruschmann

I should have mine deployed next week as well. Just received the gear today.
On Jun 17, 2016 1:11 PM, "Mike Francis"  wrote:

> By: Douglas Adams
> "Man [has] always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins
> because he had achieved so much-the wheel, New York, wars and so on-while
> all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good
> time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far
> more intelligent than man-for precisely the same reason."
>
> John Michael Francis II
> JMF Solutions, Inc
> Wavefly Technologies
> Internet - Voip - Cloud
> 251-517-5069
> http://jmfsolutions.net
> http://wavefly.com
>
> On 6/17/2016 4:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Anxiously awaiting your results...and a quote!
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Mike Francis 
> wrote:
>
>> We received our first shipment of gear this week and plan on beginning
>> deployment next week. Will let you guys know. We are doing a mix-use
>> test roll out with a gov cyber task force, so it will be well documented.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> John Michael Francis II
>> JMF Solutions, Inc
>> Wavefly Technologies
>> Internet - Voip - Cloud
>> 251-517-5069
>> http://jmfsolutions.net
>> http://wavefly.com
>>
>> On 6/17/2016 3:05 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> > I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not speak
>> > yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth come very
>> > soon.
>> >
>> > On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >> Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed?  Care
>> >> to comment on/off list?
>> >>
>> >> Josh Luthman
>> >> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >> 1100 Wayne St
>> >> Suite 1337
>> >> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Wireless mailing list
>> >> Wireless@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >>
>> > ___
>> > Wireless mailing list
>> > Wireless@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing 
> listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Look up DID owner

2016-06-14 Thread Chris Fabien

Thanks that is the tool I needed!
On Jun 13, 2016 7:18 PM, "Jon Hebb"  wrote:

> Free LRN lookup at the bottom of this page:
> http://www.alcazarnetworks.com/data_services_lnp_lrn.php
> On Jun 13, 2016 5:26 PM, "Chris Fabien"  wrote:
>
>> We are having a porting problem. Is there anyone who can lookup a number
>> and find out whose system we are hitting when we dial it. It's a current
>> customers porting away from us and I think the other provider messed up the
>> port but are blaming us.
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Look up DID owner

2016-06-13 Thread Chris Fabien

We are having a porting problem. Is there anyone who can lookup a number
and find out whose system we are hitting when we dial it. It's a current
customers porting away from us and I think the other provider messed up the
port but are blaming us.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Software for network monitoring

2015-01-09 Thread Chris Hudson

I'm using the aNag app for android. It gives you alerts and what not.

Chris

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

 Original message From: George Rogato 
 Date:01/09/2015  7:57 PM  (GMT-06:00) 
To: WISPA General List  Cc:  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Software for network monitoring 
I use Nagios for up, down, unreachables.
It has a plug in for mozilla firefox that sits in the bottom add on bar which 
shows you up, down, unreachables and more. It's customizable.

On 1/9/2015 2:11 PM, Fabrizio Fiore Donati wrote:
Hi all we have a network of about 200 wireless pop, each pop have about 8 
devices, what software do you suggest to use for monitoring ?
Wireless devices are a mix of mikrotik, ubiquity, cambium and siae 
microelettronica. Switches are zte and cisco.

Right now we use ipswitch whatsup gold but i'm looking for a valid alternative.

Anu suggestion ?

Fabrizio Fiore Donati

Mobile: +39 3289872420
E-mail: fabrizio.fioredon...@2bite.net

2bite s.r.l.
Via Campo di Pile
67100 L'Aquila (AQ) - Italy
Tel.: +39 0862441583

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Fake Survey Ad/Scam from Zedo.com

2014-12-18 Thread Chris Fabien

Going further, it looks like your free gift is actually a free trial of a
$149 cosmetics package and an auto-enrollment in their $99/mo auto
replenishment - real nice.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:
>
> Typical phishing thing...just warn your customers I suppose?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Chris Fabien  wrote:
>
>> We are getting reports from our users that "we took your online
>> survey"
>>
>> Finally happened to catch it on my personal computer, it is a fake survey
>> that offers $120 gift for taking a survey from LakeNet LLC, asks a series
>> of questions about our service and then lets the user select their choice
>> of some junk cosmetics or a free credit report.
>>
>> I'm not even sure what the point of this is, but I tracked it back to
>> Zedo.com which is an advertising agency. I've tried calling them, only able
>> to get to a voicemail box which tells me to email their support address,
>> which I've done
>>
>> Is this type of thing even legal for them to do? It's totally
>> misrepresenting their ad as being from my company.
>>
>> I'm attaching a screenshot.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Chris Fabien
>> LakeNet LLC
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Fake Survey Ad/Scam from Zedo.com

2014-12-18 Thread Chris Fabien

We are getting reports from our users that "we took your online survey"

Finally happened to catch it on my personal computer, it is a fake survey
that offers $120 gift for taking a survey from LakeNet LLC, asks a series
of questions about our service and then lets the user select their choice
of some junk cosmetics or a free credit report.

I'm not even sure what the point of this is, but I tracked it back to
Zedo.com which is an advertising agency. I've tried calling them, only able
to get to a voicemail box which tells me to email their support address,
which I've done

Is this type of thing even legal for them to do? It's totally
misrepresenting their ad as being from my company.

I'm attaching a screenshot.

Any suggestions?

Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

2014-12-17 Thread Chris Ruschmann

When I googled the rainiest places in the US, it doesn't show Alaska, But I
laugh at the places they do show and how little of rain they get compared
to us. Mine actually works better in snow.

I use Airfiber without issues. Align you link correctly and don't push the
limits and you should be fine.

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:37 AM,  wrote:
>
> True throughput and longer range, plus a metal dish means real money.
>
> Daniel
>
> Gino Villarini  wrote ..
> > Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch!
> >
> >
> >
> > Gino A. Villarini
> > President
> > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> > www.aeronetpr.com
> > @aeronetpr
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "ben.mo...@ubnt.com" <
> ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
> > Reply-To: WISPA General List  wireless@wispa.org>>
> > Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM
> > To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced
> >
> > Hi Gino -
> >
> > Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be
> received in early
> > to mid January.
> >
> > MSRP is $6k/link.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini  >
> > wrote:
> > Just got a email from UBNT
> >
> > AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps
> Fdx
> >
> > http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/
> >
> > No pricing or availability info, Ben?
> >
> >
> >
> > Gino A. Villarini
> > President
> > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> > www.aeronetpr.com
> > @aeronetpr
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Looking for Service

2014-11-30 Thread chris

thanks to everyone who replied on and offlist already, got a number of
 suggestions and so far they all look good! i cant believe how many
responses i got and on a sunday no less!

chris

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rick Harnish  wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Check with Storm Internet out of Ottawa.
> http://www.wispa.org/member-directory
>
> Rick Harnish
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> ---- Original message 
> From: chris 
> Date:11/30/2014 3:07 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: WISPA General List 
> Subject: [WISPA] Looking for Service
>
> Hello,
>
> I am researching connectivity for a family member, just looking to see if
> there's any list members who can reach them before researching other
> options.
>
> Any canadian WISP that can provide service at:
>
> Smith Road, Oxford Station, ON K0G 1T0
>
> Thanks!
> chris
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Looking for Service

2014-11-30 Thread chris

Hello,

I am researching connectivity for a family member, just looking to see if
there's any list members who can reach them before researching other
options.

Any canadian WISP that can provide service at:

Smith Road, Oxford Station, ON K0G 1T0

Thanks!
chris
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Looking for service

2014-11-14 Thread Chris Wright

We have Manteca covered easily at that speed. Feel free to contact me off list.

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of John Thomas
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 9:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Looking for service

Looking for 10 meg

1640 West Yosemite Blvd.
Manteca, CA 95337

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

2014-11-03 Thread Chris Wright

Well I doubt it'll get easier and less expensive than Apple's $20 Server plugin 
for OSX. As far as Windows, I don't think M$ offers anything. You could set up 
a squid server - good luck.

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Blair Davis
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 2:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

I really appreciate the discussion here.

But, I will ask my question again...

Does anybody have an inexpensive, transparent way of caching all/most of 
Windows/Microsoft update update and of apple/iOS updates?

If so, I'd like to learn how to do it.

I need to reduce traffic on my main connections to the net... Downloading the 
updates at night and having them locally cached would do a lot for me...

--
On 11/3/2014 12:53 PM, Tim Way wrote:
Cool! This discussion has been really interesting. It is nice to see both sides 
of the problem and how you and potentially others are tackling throughput 
issues out in their live infrastructure.

Tim

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Simon Westlake 
mailto:si...@powercode.com>> wrote:
It's the AP, not the backhaul. We just don't have space or frequency available 
to keep deploying more and more APs (let alone the cost) - having a single 
Procera help control them is significantly cheaper than continuing to deploy 
infrastructure to split up customers.
On 11/2/2014 5:57 PM, Tim Way wrote:
Ya I see ya there. I'm surprised you are having that much congestion on those 
back haul links out to the tower unless the AP itself on the tower is maxed out 
during the peak hours. Is that pretty common for some of the other WISP 
providers out there? Is it more often the back-haul or the capacity of a 
particular radio? What are the ways people are solving it when a particular 
radio is chatty during peak hours? Do you put another (set of sectors) in 
another frequency and connect some customers to that one if their is frequency 
to spare? Is moving towards a model where you have more source radios 
(towers/cells) so the density on a particular radio isn't as high?

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Simon Westlake 
mailto:si...@powercode.com>> wrote:
It is a completely different solution. There would be no caching, it's all 
shaping or filtering. For example, what we do is, during peak hours, no 
software updates or backup systems (like Dropbox, Carbonite, etc) can use more 
than 128Kbps per customer. Outside peak hours, we let them run wild.

A caching server wouldn't do us any good unless we put one at each tower. Our 
upstream is not the problem.

On 10/30/2014 11:51 PM, Tim Way wrote:
I agree with Paul on this one for sure. I don't know much about the Procera box 
but is their method support by Apple or is more of a traditional in-line proxy 
that intercepts and redirects the communication?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Paul Conlin 
mailto:pcon...@blazebroadband.com>> wrote:
Because management of Apple iOS updates is one big thing that Procera can do to 
help optimize a WISPs network. But if you are running a low cost low overhead 
Apple update caching server you could very easily do this without an expensive 
Procera box.

PC
Blaze Broadband

On October 30, 2014 5:33:59 PM EDT, Josh Reynolds 
mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote:
Quick question,

Maybe I missed something, but how did we go from traffic shaping and DPI 
devices to something that does caching for apple stuff? Those are two entirely 
different classes of products.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/30/2014 01:30 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
It can work on networks not behind a NAT.
http://help.apple.com/serverapp/mac/4.0/#/apd6015d9573


Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>


From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product


Okay, so it would be for networks behind a NAT.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com




From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:22:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
Disregard my "AFAIK" answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/

"The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it's public IP, your 
servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)"

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mail

[WISPA] Mikrotik AC for PtP

2014-11-01 Thread Chris Fabien

Ordered a couple of the NetMetal5 which have the RB/922UAGS-5HPacD in them.
Anyone used these yet? Is there a version of RouterOS known to work well?
Are they stable yet software wise on the AC stuff?
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: "Josh Reynolds" mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>>
To: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:33:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
Quick question,

Maybe I missed something, but how did we go from traffic shaping and DPI 
devices to something that does caching for apple stuff? Those are two entirely 
different classes of products.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/30/2014 01:30 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
It can work on networks not behind a NAT.
http://help.apple.com/serverapp/mac/4.0/#/apd6015d9573

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Okay, so it would be for networks behind a NAT.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:22:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
Disregard my “AFAIK” answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/

“The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it’s public IP, your 
servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)”

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.)

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul Conlin
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in?

PC
Blaze Broadband
On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard.  The issue 
 isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way mailto:t...@way.lc>> 
wrote:
For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network.

Tim Way

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco 
mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it>> wrote:
Hello,

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have
(and the experince you want to give to the users)

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies.

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g.
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models.

For sure investing mo

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

It can work on networks not behind a NAT.
http://help.apple.com/serverapp/mac/4.0/#/apd6015d9573

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Okay, so it would be for networks behind a NAT.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:22:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
Disregard my “AFAIK” answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/

“The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it’s public IP, your 
servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)”

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.)

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul Conlin
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in?

PC
Blaze Broadband
On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard.  The issue 
 isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way mailto:t...@way.lc>> 
wrote:
For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network.

Tim Way

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco 
mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it>> wrote:
Hello,

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have
(and the experince you want to give to the users)

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies.

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g.
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models.

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :)

Just my 2 cents

> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS policies on core routers
> & layer 3 switches, and monitoring flows using Netflow.
>
> More work, but much less $$. Allows us to invest in infrastructure
> rather than extraordinarily expensive bandwidth management devices.
>
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Larry A. Weidig
> *Sent:* Friday, October

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Disregard my “AFAIK” answer. This is the real answer per 
http://www.nbalonso.com/os-x-server-caching/

“The cache server registers online with Apple and provides it’s public IP, your 
servers local IP, internal DNS name? (not sure of the dns)”

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

____
From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.)

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul Conlin
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in?

PC
Blaze Broadband
On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard.  The issue 
 isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way mailto:t...@way.lc>> 
wrote:
For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network.

Tim Way

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco 
mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it>> wrote:
Hello,

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have
(and the experince you want to give to the users)

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies.

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g.
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models.

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :)

Just my 2 cents

> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS policies on core routers
> & layer 3 switches, and monitoring flows using Netflow.
>
> More work, but much less $$. Allows us to invest in infrastructure
> rather than extraordinarily expensive bandwidth management devices.
>
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Larry A. Weidig
> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:17 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
>
> Very interesting, thanks for the lead. Seems they have a product and a
> library available. Have contacted them for additional information.
>
> 
>
> Larry A. Weidig (lwei...@excel.net<mailto:lwei...@excel.net> 
> <mailto:lwei...@excel.net<mailto:lwei...@excel.net>>)
> Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/
> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area
> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free
>
> 
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> 
> <mail

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

It’s essentially acting as a squid proxy; they don’t need to know. As far as 
the end user is concerned, they’re talking to Apple servers. Your router routes 
traffic bound for Apple to your local server first, as far as I can tell.

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

I couldn't see how other people are supposed to know you have one of these 
caches running.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

____
From: "Chris Wright" mailto:ch...@velociter.net>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.)

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul Conlin
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in?

PC
Blaze Broadband
On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard.  The issue 
 isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way mailto:t...@way.lc>> 
wrote:
For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network.

Tim Way

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco 
mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it>> wrote:
Hello,

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have
(and the experince you want to give to the users)

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies.

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g.
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models.

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :)

Just my 2 cents

> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS policies on core routers
> & layer 3 switches, and monitoring flows using Netflow.
>
> More work, but much less $$. Allows us to invest in infrastructure
> rather than extraordinarily expensive bandwidth management devices.
>
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Larry A. Weidig
> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:17 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
>
> Very interesting, thanks for the lead. Seems they have a product and a
> library available. Have contacted them for additional information.
>
> 
>
> Larry A. Weidig (lwei...@excel.net<mailto:lwei...@excel.net> 
> <mailto:lwei...@excel.net<mailto:lwei...@excel.net>>)
> Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/
> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area
> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free
>
> 
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> 
> <mailto:j...@spit

Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

OSX Server is a $19.99 add-on to OSX Yosemite. You can virtualize OSX in ESXi 
(of course it won’t be supported by Apple unless it’s Apple hardware.)

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Paul Conlin
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product

Unless the caching server is free. Under what conditions does Apple put one of 
these in?

PC
Blaze Broadband
On October 28, 2014 1:41:41 PM EDT, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I don't think many people care about caching servers in this regard.  The issue 
 isn't the upstream pipe filling up, it's all the APs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Timothy Way mailto:t...@way.lc>> 
wrote:
For those that are unaware of it you should take a look at Apple's Caching 
Server 2. It is pretty cool, it provides Apple software updates, iTunes content 
and basically anything Apple in a local cache that is transparent to the 
client. Apple looks at the source IP of the device asking for content and tells 
it to hit the local IP of your caching server. My day job is a Network 
Administrator at a technical college. This has prevented the "APPLE DAYS OF 
DOOM" when they release updates in regards to our open (public) wireless 
network.

Tim Way

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Paolo Di Francesco 
mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it>> wrote:
Hello,

it depends on what you want/can achieve and how much bandwidth you have
(and the experince you want to give to the users)

In few words: those boxes do not invent bandwidth they (all) try to
improve how you manage it. So those boxes are managing the bandwidth
with their policies that could or could not fit your policies.

Some simple tricks will help you to move the traffic locally (e.g.
Implementing local web-caching, local DNS, etc) but for sure you have to
work on the infrastructure to optimize the traffic. The nice thing, in
that case, is that you will be more aware of what your users are doing
and how to make them happy; the bad part of the story is that you have
to spend time (or consultants) to get it. For the hardware, many are
using Mikrotik CCR or even slower/cheaper Mikrotik models.

For sure investing more in infrastructure will help a lot :)

Just my 2 cents

> Having used Allot NetEnforcer for years, then moved to Exinda for
> years, we are now considering removing bandwidth managers altogether
> and relying solely on policing on radios, QoS policies on core routers
> & layer 3 switches, and monitoring flows using Netflow.
>
> More work, but much less $$. Allows us to invest in infrastructure
> rather than extraordinarily expensive bandwidth management devices.
>
> *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Larry A. Weidig
> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:17 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
>
> Very interesting, thanks for the lead. Seems they have a product and a
> library available. Have contacted them for additional information.
>
> 
>
> Larry A. Weidig (lwei...@excel.net<mailto:lwei...@excel.net> 
> <mailto:lwei...@excel.net<mailto:lwei...@excel.net>>)
> Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/
> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area
> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free
>
> 
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> 
> <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>>>
> *To: *wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org> 
> <mailto:wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> *Sent: *Friday, October 24, 2014 7:15:20 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] procera or similiar product
>
> should check out ipoque and their PACE engine
>
> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> 
> <http://www.spitwspots.com>
>
> On 10/24/2014 03:40 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote:
>
> We have done some searching in this arena and have only found a
> couple of what seem to be similar products available:
>
> Allot Communications - NetEnforcer (does a lot, costs a lot so
> they live up to their name :) )
>
> Netaxcel - Found it, did not dig far into it
>
> NetEqualizer - Reasonable, but not as featured as Procera / Allot
>
>

Re: [WISPA] Ruckus launches Small Biz WiFI solution spin off Xclaim Wireless

2014-10-29 Thread Chris Wright

I eyeballed them a few months ago when I was repositioning some funds in my 
IRA. The quality of their employees aside, what's your opinion of their 
products?

Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless<http://www.velociter.net/>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ruckus launches Small Biz WiFI solution spin off Xclaim 
Wireless

Looks like an excellent product for the small business enterprise. Love that 
GUI showing which users' phone are hitting it hard.

I've a ton of friends and ex-colleagues over at Ruckus, so I know they've good 
people.

Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01CFF37B.BE2F1F80]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Daniel White
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:35 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ruckus launches Small Biz WiFI solution spin off Xclaim 
Wireless

Thanks for the heads up Gino!

Now I know what AP is going into my new office.  I love Ruckus... but the price 
was always the killer thing.

[cid:image001.jpg@01CE2975.BD4B6370]

Daniel White | Managing Director
SAF North America LLC

Cell:


(303) 746-3590

Skype:

danieldwhite

E-mail:

daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com<mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com>


SAF Tehnika & Integra Introduction Video - http://youtu.be/xqrXOq4Uzgg
Spectrum Compact Introduction Video - http://youtu.be/2GoNP974B4k



  [cid:40B6B97A-78D8-4322-9584-2247AEDCEC32] 
<https://www.facebook.com/SAFTehnika>   
[cid:C62FF935-06DE-41B5-8D9C-6CDF5978E509] <https://twitter.com/SAFTehnika>   
[cid:A57FE05F-BC56-4980-982F-1E3DA8E28EBE] 
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/saf-tehnika-jsc>   
[cid:0F4D1499-0C92-4A56-9097-3F468F84263A] 
<http://www.youtube.com/user/SAFTehnika>

SAF Tehnika JSC  
www.saftehnika.com



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ruckus launches Small Biz WiFI solution spin off Xclaim 
Wireless

New player vs UBNT

Outdoor 11AC AP for $299

http://www.xclaimwireless.com/





Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr







This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.






This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 5GHz CPE Install Information

2014-10-20 Thread Chris Fabien

Well, first, we've found having multiple towers covering an area helps a
lot in these situations where a house might have trees in the wrong
direction blocking one tower, it may be open in another direction to a
different tower. So you may want more towers than necessary just to cover
the area on a map. We've actually added some 5ghz only towers to fill in
coverage gaps where we had marginal coverage on 900mhz, 2.4 or 3.65 all of
which we use for NLOS customers.

If the tech still finds they have trees in the way, then we try to get
above or around the trees. We have several options: 4x4 wood yard post with
10ft metal mast, mounted on far side of trees (like for your windbreak
example), 5 or 10ft roof tripod with 10ft mast may give just enough extra
height to clear a more distant tree line. We occasionally put a 50ft
push-up mast on an outuilding, but those are a PAIN to install and service.
And we have a lot of customers where a tower is their only option - we sell
them the tower in those cases. Sometimes they can turn into a repeater
tower to expand your 5ghz LOS service to the nearby neighbors.

Of course, there will be customers that can't afford a 60-100ft tower, so
they won't be able to get service - you can't get every customer with
wireless

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Timothy Way  wrote:

> I am doing a lot of research as well as a lab built 5GHz test system for a
> point to multi-point build. It seems everything is going the way of 5GHz
> and with that I have a fair amount of concern regarding getting a definite
> clear line of site from a customer to a tower offering them service.
> Specifically I am struggling with what others are doing on the customer
> side.
>
> The area I am looking to build out with 5GHz would be pretty typical
> farmland. The vast majority of it is wide open but around the houses people
> do have a fair amount of trees to create wind blocks and just physical
> separation from the fields.
>
> If the customer has an obstruction like trees or other rooftops that might
> block a signal do you put up your own small tower to get them service? Do
> you not try to service them?
>
> What type of equipment do you use to actually do the installation then? Do
> you generally say because of xyz reason you need a tower and we do it for
> you but it will be a one time fee of x or a monthly fee of y?
>
> Thanks in advance, Tim
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

Just ordered some. I’ll test these out and let people know how they are…

*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Stephen Potter
*Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 9:51 AM
*To:* joe.mil...@dslbyair.com; WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

I have heard good things about these:

Review:

http://www.networkcameracritic.com/?p=2041

Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Dahua-IPC-HFW4300S-Eco-Savvy-Weatherproof-Security/dp/B00H2VSTG2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1411617569&sr=8-1&keywords=IPC-HFW4300S

Steve P.

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Joe Miller
wrote:

Call these people, I just got off the phone with them myself,
http://www.netzeye.com/catalog/onvif-cameras-c-61.html I bought a couple of
the IP cameras to test out. Also, a better price point an UBNT.

*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Ryan McKenzie
*Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 9:26 AM

*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

Chris,

Wow that is good info. I had no idea they had removed the RTSP. And I was
just about to spec UBNT cams in a project using RTSP.

Have you found a good alternative?

Someone else in this thread mentioned Arecont cams. Are they cheap and
provide RTSP?

Thanks,
Ryan McKenzie
385-215-WIFI

On 9/25/14, 10:34 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:

The newer UVC cams apparently don't have it at all. And the aircam beta is
currently set to remove it for good. So your good if you never update. But
what do you do if you need another or RMA? SOL I guess...

I started a thread in the beta forums and called on UBNT to answer for
there crime and got crickets.

sent from my phone!

On Sep 25, 2014 8:18 PM, "Blair Davis" wrote:

Do you know what firmware version lost RSTP?

Can the newer cams be rolled back to the old firmware or do I need to
return them to my supplier?

If I can't do RSTP directly from the cam, they are mostly useless to me.

On 9/25/2014 5:57 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:

Be careful with UBNT cameras now. They are/have disabled RSTP completly. So
what you have to do now is backhaul your feed to a Unifi Video server then
get your RTSP stream from there. It changed the game in how we are going to
be doing cameras now as we were taking RTSP streams selectively and
directly from the camera when we wanted the info so we didn’t have to waste
5Mbps per stream at all times to our head ends. Plus they will only work
with Unifi Video which is lame as well.

*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *LTI - Dennis Burgess
*Sent:* Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:37 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

We use UBNT cameras and MT backhauls, SXTs are cheap: )

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, TJ Trout wrote:

I use geovision IP cameras, they work great but no wifi options.

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:

Got a project that requires 10-12 outdoor cams, prefer wifi units so we can
backhaul them in 5 ghz

Any ideas?

Gino A. Villarini

President

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

www.aeronetpr.com

@aeronetpr

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

*Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer*

* Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition
<http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm>”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support
Services
Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net – *Skype*:
linktechs
* -- Create Wireless Coverage’s with *www.towercoverage.com *– 900Mhz – LTE
– 3G – 3.65 – TV Whitespace *

___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

West Michigan Wireless ISP

Allegan, Michigan 49010

269-686-8648

A Division of:

Camp Communication Services, INC

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

I haven’t found a good solution that I like yet. We’ve used Axis in the
past, and they are fantastic, but expensive L



*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Ryan McKenzie
*Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 6:26 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams



Chris,

Wow that is good info.  I had no idea they had removed the RTSP.  And I was
just about to spec UBNT cams in a project using RTSP.

Have you found a good alternative?

Someone else in this thread mentioned Arecont cams.  Are they cheap and
provide RTSP?

Thanks,
Ryan McKenzie
385-215-WIFI

On 9/25/14, 10:34 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:

The newer UVC cams apparently don't have it at all. And the aircam beta is
currently set to remove it for good. So your good if you never update. But
what do you do if you need another or RMA? SOL I guess...

I started a thread in the beta forums and called on UBNT to answer for
there crime and got crickets.

sent from my phone!

On Sep 25, 2014 8:18 PM, "Blair Davis"  wrote:

Do you know what firmware version lost RSTP?

Can the newer cams be rolled back to the old firmware or do I need to
return them to my supplier?

If I can't do RSTP directly from the cam, they are mostly useless to me.

--

On 9/25/2014 5:57 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:

Be careful with UBNT cameras now. They are/have disabled RSTP completly. So
what you have to do now is backhaul your feed to a Unifi Video server then
get your RTSP stream from there. It changed the game in how we are going to
be doing cameras now as we were taking RTSP streams selectively and
directly from the camera when we wanted the info so we didn’t have to waste
5Mbps per stream at all times to our head ends. Plus they will only work
with Unifi Video which is lame as well.







*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *LTI - Dennis Burgess
*Sent:* Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:37 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams



We use UBNT cameras and MT backhauls, SXTs are cheap: )



On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, TJ Trout  wrote:

I use geovision IP cameras, they work great but no wifi options.



On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Gino Villarini  wrote:

Got a project that requires 10-12 outdoor cams, prefer wifi units so we can
backhaul them in 5 ghz



Any ideas?







Gino A. Villarini

President

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

www.aeronetpr.com

@aeronetpr







___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





-- 

*Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer*

* Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition
<http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm>”
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support
Services
 Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net – *Skype*:
linktechs
 *-- Create Wireless Coverage’s with *www.towercoverage.com *– 900Mhz – LTE
– 3G – 3.65 – TV Whitespace  *



___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



-- 

West Michigan Wireless ISP

Allegan, Michigan  49010

269-686-8648



A Division of:

Camp Communication Services, INC


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams

The problem is that it is only retranslated from the UBNT NVR Software.



Can’t do it directly from the camera any more.



*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 8:29 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams



Awesome!  Hopefully we can get world ro snapshot.cgi again, too!





Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Chris Ruschmann 
wrote:

Do you need some coffee?



What cameras are you referring to?



The old air cams will work up until the current beta with RTSP.



Unifi Video Cameras UVC, don’t have the capability outside of a re-stream
from the NVR.



Pasted from the 3.0.8 Beta Release blog:



UniFi Video 3.0.7 Beta
<http://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Video-Beta-Blog/UniFi-Video-3-0-7-Beta-amp-UVC-AirCam-3-0-8-Release/ba-p/913476>
introduces
a new RTSP retranslation feature. Now you can restream video from gen1/gen2
cameras to third-party software via RTSP. See how below:







*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Dennis Burgess
*Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 8:08 AM


*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams



The ones we have work with other software..could be wrong on that.. Hows
this, my cams at my house is working fine.



Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270



*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
] *On Behalf Of *Chris Ruschmann
*Sent:* Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:58 PM
*To:* gmsm...@gmail.com; WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams



Be careful with UBNT cameras now. They are/have disabled RSTP completly. So
what you have to do now is backhaul your feed to a Unifi Video server then
get your RTSP stream from there. It changed the game in how we are going to
be doing cameras now as we were taking RTSP streams selectively and
directly from the camera when we wanted the info so we didn’t have to waste
5Mbps per stream at all times to our head ends. Plus they will only work
with Unifi Video which is lame as well.







*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *LTI - Dennis Burgess
*Sent:* Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:37 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams



We use UBNT cameras and MT backhauls, SXTs are cheap: )



On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, TJ Trout  wrote:

I use geovision IP cameras, they work great but no wifi options.



On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Gino Villarini  wrote:

Got a project that requires 10-12 outdoor cams, prefer wifi units so we can
backhaul them in 5 ghz



Any ideas?







Gino A. Villarini

President

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

www.aeronetpr.com

@aeronetpr







___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





-- 

*Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer*

* Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition
<http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm>”
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support
Services
 Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net – *Skype*:
linktechs
 *-- Create Wireless Coverage’s with *www.towercoverage.com *– 900Mhz – LTE
– 3G – 3.65 – TV Whitespace  *


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Wifi Outdoor Cams