Re: [ZION] Definition of liberal

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler
This is more of the meaning it still has in Europe, and to a certain extent, in
Canada, although Canada, as in so many things, is halfway between. It has more of
the US meaning here in Alberta, but it has the European meaning more in Ontario,
where I lived for 14 years on two different occasions. The Liberal Democrats in
the UK are a centrist, pro-entrepreneurial party, believe it or not (they're the
3rd party after Labour and the Conservatives). They're popular in exurban areas
and in high-tech areas like Berkshire, for instance, and their MPs tend to be
younger as a rule.  In Germany das Freie Demokratische Partei (Free Democratic
Party) is also called die Liberalen (see the fine print in their logo at the
top of their webpage http://www.fdp.de/portal/portal.phtml?t=2lbv=y, where it
says FDP -- die Liberalen; kind of like LDS -- the Mormons, I guess). They
are a fairly small party, but usually form part of the ruling coalition, either
with the left-of-centre SDP or the right-of-centre CDU/CSU. (Schröder is SDP but
the SDP won with about the same margin the Republicans did in the US, in the
German federal elections about a month ago). For the past decade they've been
frozen out as the SDP has gone with the Greens (left-wing) instead, in the
so-called Rot-Grün Koalition (Red Green, now in syndication on cable in the US).
The FDP is like the CDU/CSU but without the latter's conservative social agenda,
so perhaps more like Libertarians than Republicans.

I don't know Belgian politics as well, but I understand they have a Liberal Party
as well.

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 At 08:25 PM 10/23/2002, you wrote:
 Unfortunately, it is what Liberal now means in the US.
 
 It used to be that liberal was one that sought to help the underdog with
 smart assistance from government, while ensuring the freedoms of the
 average joe. But the term liberal has been co-opted by fringe groups in
 the US. Gore is a perfect example of what liberal now means in the US:
 follows the extreme environmental tactics, reproductive rights, and the
 rights of perverse groups.

 Actually our founding fathers (U.S.) were perfect examples of the classical
 liberal. Etymology wise the word has roots in the more meaningful term,
 liberty.

 Constitutionalism. I want to be known as a constitutionalist in the
 tradition of James Madison-father of the Constitution. Labels change and
 perhaps in the old tradition I would be considered one of the original
 Whigs. The new title I would wear today is that of conservative-though in
 its original British connotation the term liberal fits me better than the
 original meaning of the word conservative.
 To show how labels can change or be stolen, a liberal today believes in
 greater government intervention and less personal freedom for the people,
 which is practically the opposite of what the old liberals believed years
 ago. (The Red Carpet, pp. 206-7.)
   (Ezra Taft Benson, The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson [Salt Lake City:
 Bookcraft, 1988], 690.)

 --
 Steven Montgomery
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 HTML
 BODY
 a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0
 src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
 PPBR
 /BODY
 /HTML

 /
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 /


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: [ZION] High Priests

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler


John W. Redelfs wrote:

 At 11:41 PM, Tuesday, 10/22/02, Gary Smith wrote:
 It is partially an issue of maturity/age: placing those who have not had
 a line authority position requiring HP status, into the HP quorum/group,
 in order to strengthen the individual and also to strengthen the quorum.

 Yes but that is not what the CHI says.  A man who would be more comfortable
 meeting with the high priests because of his age could be authorized to do
 so without ordaining him a high priest.

This is true. As in my original anecdote, I even taught HPs while a 70, and met
with them for several years before being ordained a HP.

  Unless there is compelling reason
 otherwise, such as inspiration to the stake president, a man is called to
 be a high priest only if his calling requires it.

 At least that is my understanding.

 John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] High Priests have money

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler


Paul Osborne wrote:


 And, yes, John gave me some good pointers. I've seen how John operates
 too and have watched him type letters to the list. I've seen his
 computer, chair, book shelves, and table. I can visualize him right now
 in my mind.


Having trouble sleeping, are we?
ducking with eyes open in two directions...

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] Sniper Victims

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Thanks for elucidating my fuzzification.

Valerie Nielsen Williams wrote:

 Marc:  Maybe a little ;-)I've pasted articles below on each victim.

 val

  Hmm. Maybe I've got my wires crossed. The one I'm thinking of worked
  at the time
  of her death at the FBI (which doesn't say what she did earlier),
  and she had red
  hair. Does that fit in?
 
  Valerie Nielsen Williams wrote:
 
   I didn't know this, but I do know that when the woman vaccuuming
  her van
   was killed, the news said she was a former nanny, married and a
  recent
   convert to the Mormon Church.
  
   val
  
 _
 from http://www.meridianmagazine.com/editorial/021016sniper.html

 Latter-day Saint Victim

 The sniper brings the threat close to home. How close? On October 4, when
 the sniper killed five people in a two-hour span, the shootings were
 within a 2-1/2 mile radius of each other—and the Washington D.C. temple.
 One of the victims was Lori Ann Lewis-Rivera, a 25 year-old Latter-day
 Saint, who was shot in the back at a Kensington, Maryland Shell station

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] High Priests have money

2002-10-24 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 21:43 10/23/2002 -0500, Gary wrote:


The Brethren had comfortable lives because they earned a comfortable
life.



Not so sure I agree, Gary.  Reference Approaching Zion Chapters 4 and 
5.  Not so sure earned is the correct choice of terms here.

Till

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] UN Moral Authority

2002-10-24 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:22 PM 10/23/2002, Marc wrote:


the UN Security Council). Nation states are dying as institutions, and 
power is
flowing up to super-regions, and down to micro-regions, so the question 
will come
to make even less and less sense as the new century unfolds, imo.

--
Marc A. Schindler

I agree, and believe you are right. Although we would probably disagree on 
the causes.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] High Priests have money

2002-10-24 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 21:46 10/23/2002 -0500, St Paul wrote:

I will admit that I used
to annoyed about it in the past.


Till detects that it is still unresolved


But it is the Lord's church and he can
do whatever he wants, so I have come to accept it.



You're on the right track, though


but I'm sure he had sufficient for his means


Here's the key.





I'm working on it. :-)




Absolutely the best statement  yet.  With this, all things can be accomplished.



Till, who hopes he hasn't offended

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: Voting and parties (was Re: [ZION] Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-24 Thread Jon Spencer
Never, or when you die, or when Christ returns, whichever comes first.

Jon

Cousin Bill wrote:
 At some point in the past, Mark wrote:

  Bill brings up an interesting point.  Is it a good idea to work within a
 party in order to change it?  Presumably the answer is yes.  What if the
 party currently supports every charter violating thing in existence?  Just
 where does one draw the line?
 -
 And when does one just give up on it?

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] High Priest

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler
I felt the same thing when I was released from my mission. It was an almost
palpable loss.

Elmer L. Fairbank wrote:

 At 02:55 10/24/2002 +, St Stephen wrote:

 If a man who has previously served as elder's quorum president, then
 been released, is again called to serve, he does not need to have the
 keys given him. He already has them. The same applies to a former bishop
 who is called to serve again as bishop, or a former stake president
 called to serve again as stake president, etc. Mark, Larry, Till,
 correct me if I'm wrong, but this is my understanding.

 My understanding is that this is not correct.  The priesthood office
 remains but the keys to function in that role/stewardship are removed.  Who
 was it at conference told of being bishop and losing his date night.  He
 also said that after he was released it was impossible for him to give
 counsel as he had.  I have actually felt the mantle of authority leave (a
 phenomenon I would describe as being physical, replaced by a stupor of
 thought, our current state) when released from leadership callings.

 Till  the no-longer enlightened

 /
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 /


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: [ZION] High Priests More Active Than Elders

2002-10-24 Thread Sandy and Melinda Rabinowitz
From what I've noticed here in my ward--

Prospective Elders: 98% Inactive*
Elders: Seems like 25-30% Inactive, at least here
High Priests: 5-10% Inactive, but it seems as if the 
  inactivity occurs mainly for health reasons, such as
  an extended hospitalization

As Paul O. noted, Prospective Elders are counted in the 
numbers for the Elders Quorum, regardless of the actual
priesthood office the member has (if any).  On that basis,
the 50% inactivity rate for the entire Quorum sounds
just about right.  /Sandy/ 

(* The 2% in this category are invariably recent converts,
and most of these don't remain Prospective Elders for very
long, as they receive the Melchezidek Priesthood within months
to perhaps over a year.  The remaining 98% either dropped off 
the radar screen shortly after being baptised, or else fell 
away while they were still attending Aaronic Priesthood quorums.)

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] High Priest

2002-10-24 Thread Mark Gregson

-Larry-
 Keys, where needed, are given to the person set apart for
 a calling.  He only holds those keys until he is released.

-Stephen-
How about that? That's directly opposite to what a bishop told me years back. Thanks 
for the clarification.

I concur with Larry.  An ordained bishop, if called again to lead a ward, even the 
same ward he used to lead, will again be set apart as the bishop of that ward and 
given the keys of a bishop.  Obviously, he is not ordained again to the office of 
bishop.

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =

   
-- 
__
Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/

Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/

Powered by Outblaze

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] The Jerusalem Temple

2002-10-24 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 12:10 10/24/2002 -0500, St Paul wrote:



I think we have been here before. It's a good subject. I say that the
Jews can't build a temple that the Lord will accept. A temple must be
built and consecrated to the Lord Jesus Christ and the Jews cannot do
that.

The temple in Jerusalem will be built by the LDS church for in behalf of
Mormon Jews. The LDS church is the only people under the heavens that can
perform such a work. To think that the Jews will build a temple outside
of the authority of the Mormons is just like saying the Jehovah's
Witnesses can do so too. There is no scriptural reference to support such
an idea.



Somebody should have clued Solomon in on this idea!  Could have saved him a 
lot of expense.  Likewise Zarubabel.  Herod's another story.

IOW, I don't rule out the possibility, although in principle I agree.  I 
just think that such statements are too uncomfortably close to a bible, a 
bible, we have a bible to suit me.   The Lord will do whatever he wants, 
without consulting me first.  (good thing for the world, too)


Till

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] The Jerusalem Temple

2002-10-24 Thread Paul Osborne
We know that a temple will be built in Jerusalem before the Second 
Coming.  We also know that a temple will be built in Jackson County
before 
the Savior comes.  Question: will the temple in Jerusalem have to be
built 
and dedicated under the authority and supervision of the Melchizedek 
priesthood?  Or will unbelieving Jews find some way of building a real 
temple without authority from God?
We know that a temple is just a building until it has been dedicated by
the 
priesthood.  Will that rule still hold in Jerusalem before the Second
Coming.


I think we have been here before. It's a good subject. I say that the
Jews can't build a temple that the Lord will accept. A temple must be
built and consecrated to the Lord Jesus Christ and the Jews cannot do
that. 

The temple in Jerusalem will be built by the LDS church for in behalf of
Mormon Jews. The LDS church is the only people under the heavens that can
perform such a work. To think that the Jews will build a temple outside
of the authority of the Mormons is just like saying the Jehovah's
Witnesses can do so too. There is no scriptural reference to support such
an idea. 

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] Canada proposes a new metric measure: the pei :-)

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Greater love hath no province than this, that he giveth up his humble
ego so as to make Toronto look big
Tongue-in-cheek argument that the pei become a new unit, from a
professor who lives in Anne of Green Gablesland, the Island, the home
of Confederation, and our equivalent to New Jersey when it comes to
comparative land measure:

http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/PEstory/TGAM/20021024/COVISION/Comment/comment/comment_temp/1/1/4/

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and
deeds; the worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences
have been properly debated…To think of the future and wait was merely
another way of saying one was a coward; any idea of moderation was just
an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly character; ability to understand a
question from all sides meant that one was totally unfitted for action.”
– Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by Thucydides in “The
Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the
author’s employer, nor those of any organization with which the author
may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




[ZION] Canada followers and bagpipe lovers/haters :-)

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Here's your little second-hand chuckle for the day.

Ah, I feel sorry for those who can't get CBC Radio One. As I type this
I'm listening to a Madly Off in All Directions* concert the
Saskatchewan comedian John Elliott is giving in Pictou (pick-toe, not
pick-too), Nova Scotia, heart of bagpipe country (during tourist season
a real piper pipes you across the NB-NS border). He's been doing
imitations (like a British cop car turning corners. You have to be
there). But he says when he flew out to Halifax, the closest major
airport, he was going through security and another Nova Scotian was
ahead of him and got stopped because he had a fish hook in his carry-on
baggage, and yet they let him on with his pipes. Which is capable of
inflicting more pain, I ask you?

The highlight was an attempt to get the audience to do the guitar part
(with da da da singing) and he did the banjo part of Duelling Banjos
from Deliverance. Absolutely hilarious (and he's pretty good on the
pipes, too). He said he realized it was unusual for a prairie boy to
play the pipes, but his Dad made him learn. Brett had wanted to learn
the electric guitar and play in a rock band but his Dad nixed the idea.
Too noisy, he said. ;-)

Pipers were a necessary part of highland regiments during the war. They
drew fire away from the guys with rifles. Anything to shut them up

Now he's doing whale calls on the bagpipes with the sound going through
a reverb. Actually very, very good, and funny, too. I wish I was there
actually watching.

...and now the Bagpipe Blues.

I can't take it anymore. Ay hae to goo poot on me Amazin' Grrrace
Marching Bands Rrrregatta ('alifax '87) CD...

*taken from a famous humourous story by Stephen Leacock, the Canadian
counterpart to Mark Twain/Will Rogers, who was actually an academic in
his day job as a prof teaching economics and poli sci.

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and
deeds; the worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences
have been properly debated…To think of the future and wait was merely
another way of saying one was a coward; any idea of moderation was just
an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly character; ability to understand a
question from all sides meant that one was totally unfitted for action.”
– Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by Thucydides in “The
Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the
author’s employer, nor those of any organization with which the author
may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] Figure the Odds

2002-10-24 Thread Marc A. Schindler
By the time everyone reads this you'll already know that arrests have been made in
the Washington sniper case. Let's hope they've got 'em.

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the worst
thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly debated…To
think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was a coward; any
idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly character; ability
to understand a question from all sides meant that one was totally unfitted for
action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by Thucydides in “The
Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely;
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of
any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] The Jerusalem Temple

2002-10-24 Thread Paul Osborne
Dan:
We might be in for a surprise here. The key, I think, is in the actual
consecration of the temple. The Jews will probably build it, as a
temple,...

they won't have the authority to
consecrate it, but the actual construction could be done in the faith
that
God will provide the means once it's accomplished


Sorry, but Bruce R McConkie said otherwise and I trust his judgment as
final in this matter. Now all we have to do is sit back and see how the
apostle's words will be verified. Otherwise, Bruce R McConkie didn't know
what he was talking about and we could just as well get our advice from a
Baptist preacher on this matter.

BTW, was Elder McConkie rich too? ;-)

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] High Priests

2002-10-24 Thread Gary Smith
Stephen, 
You give some nice definitions, but can you show where these definitions
come from?  I agree that the term high priest can have more than one
meaning, but there are many Church leaders who would disagree with your
Alma 13 assessment, and say that those were, indeed, high priests in the
modern sense as you so put it. 
I say that the term is an ancient one, that we were foreordained as high
priests, according to Alma. I use Occam's Razor on this, as your
definition requires a twisting of terms (or redefinition, anyway). If
Alma says faithful men were foreordained as high priests, why can't you
accept it as it is written? I mean, there are different MP titles given
in the BoM, even though I grant they aren't exactly the same as we have
today (obviously teacher was an  office in the MP for the Nephites).

And are you trying to tell me that Abraham's desire to be a high priest
just means he wanted to hold the MP? Why didn't he just say he desired to
be a priesthood holder, then? Why do we have to twist his terms, when
they are clear enough without redefining them?

Finally, we are told that there will be an ordination to become a god,
that we will be set apart as kings and priests. Since you already hold
the MP as an elder, why must one be reordained a priest?

BTW, I'm not teaching false doctrine. It may not be official doctrine of
the Church, but it isn't rejected out of hand, either (except, of course,
by you).

K'aya K'ama,
Gerald/gary  Smithgszion1 @juno.comhttp://www
.geocities.com/rameumptom/index.html
No one is as hopelessly enslaved as the person who thinks he's free.  -
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


Stephen:
1. The lead, or head, or high, priest of a group of ecumenical
authorities. Thus, Alma was high priest over the land, meaning he was
the head of the priests; similarly, Aaron, though not in possession of
the higher Priesthood, was still a high priest, since he was the
leader.

2. Any holder of the high Priesthood may properly be referred to as a
high priest, in the sense that he is a priest (i.e. a holder of the
Priesthood) after the order of Melchizedek. Thus it is that Alma calls
those who hold the higher Priesthood high priests in Alma 13:9.

3. Specifically, in modern days a high priest is an office in the
Melchizedek Priesthood, one that has certain duties assigned to it,
normally relating to administrative duties.



Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] Calling of Stake Presidents

2002-10-24 Thread Gary Smith
Paul and others, just to let you know the process for the calling of a
new stake president:

The General Authorities arrive, and they first interview the current
stake presidency and high council, then the bishops, then other high
priests in the stake, etc. 

The GAs don't ask to see the persons with the highest salaries. In fact,
it isn't a consideration. Usually, they know who it is as soon as the
person steps into the room, as the Spirit tells them who it should be. If
anyone considers the finances, it must be the Lord, because the GAs don't
ask anyone about their finances until after they are called (if at all).

This same thing happens in calling bishops and branch presidents. I just
saw our stake presidency call a branch president who has never been in a
presidency before. He's been active for about 5 years now, and only
married a year ago (he's 50 years old), with a warehouse job. Yet the
spirit he has and the strength he brings to the unit will greatly bless
the branch.


K'aya K'ama,
Gerald/gary  Smithgszion1 @juno.comhttp://www
.geocities.com/rameumptom/index.html
No one is as hopelessly enslaved as the person who thinks he's free.  -
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] kings and priests

2002-10-24 Thread Paul Osborne
And with reference to all others who also receive the Melchizedek
Priesthood, the scripture saith: “And all those who are ordained unto
this priesthood are made like unto the Son of God, abiding a priest
continually.” (JST, Heb. 7:3.) That is to say, they will be kings and
priests forever; their priesthood will continue to all eternity; they
will have eternal life. (Priesthood session, Saturday, October 1, 1977)
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] James' ossuary

2002-10-24 Thread Paul Osborne
Why? There's no evidence that he's resurrected. The James that ordained
Joseph Smith was James the Greater, brother of John the Apostle. This
James is brother of Jesus, who converted after the resurrection of
Christ, and became the bishop of Jerusalem, as well as author of the
book
of James. For all we know, he's still in the Spirit World working


Well, who knows? Wasn't Moroni resurrected? I kind of figured that saints
prior to the great apostasy have been resurrected. Then again I recall St
Paul speaking of the resurrection in a far future tense and connected it
with the second coming. 

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] High Priest

2002-10-24 Thread larry . jackson
Stephen Beecroft:

-Larry-
 Keys, where needed, are given to the person set apart for
 a calling.  He only holds those keys until he is released.

How about that? That's directly opposite to what a bishop 
told me years back. Thanks for the clarification.

___

You're welcome.  It came from the Handbook, which I don't 
think has changed in this regard.

Larry Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] High Priests

2002-10-24 Thread Stephen Beecroft
-Gary-
 You give some nice definitions, but can you show where these
 definitions come from?

Mostly from the scriptures themselves. I am pretty sure that the Bible 
never explicitly specifies that Enos was Adam's grandson, but the 
meaning is clear enough that I can say that anyway. Similarly, Alma's 
meaning is not easily mistaken.

 I agree that the term high priest can have more than one
 meaning, but there are many Church leaders who would disagree
 with your Alma 13 assessment, and say that those were, indeed,
 high priests in the modern sense as you so put it.

Name one. For my part, I name Elder Hilbig of the Seventy, who used the 
same gloss (if you care to call it such) as I have when he said last 
year in general conference:

The prophet Alma explained that men ordained to the Melchizedek 
Priesthood on earth have been 'called and prepared from the foundation 
of the world according to the foreknowledge of God, on account of their 
exceeding faith and good works; in the first place being left to choose 
good or evil; therefore they having chosen good, and exercising 
exceedingly great faith, are called with a holy calling' (Alma 13:3).

(I might also quote any number of other general authorities, e.g. Elder 
Maxwell, who in April 1986 general conference also followed this gloss, 
saying: In fact, we learn that all faithful men of the priesthood were 
'called and prepared from the foundation of the world' (Alma 13:3)...; 
or the reference in Elder Nelson's October 1987 conference talk: 
Scriptures also relate that the Lord God foreordained priests prepared 
from the foundation of the world according to his foreknowledge. Thus, 
our calling to the holy priesthood was foreseen before we were born (see 
Alma 13:1-5). But, I won't bother.)

 I say that the term is an ancient one,

No one disputes that the term high priest is ancient.

 that we were foreordained as high priests, according to Alma.

No one disputes this, either. The dispute is Alma's meaning: I (and 
apparently the general authorities) say this means a Melchizedek 
Priesthood holder, while you say it only refers to those who hold the 
office of high priest.

 I use Occam's Razor on this, as your definition requires a
 twisting of terms (or redefinition, anyway).

Perhaps you should tell Elders Maxwell, Nelson, and Hilbig about Occam's 
razor, so they can get their acts together.

 If Alma says faithful men were foreordained as high priests,
 why can't you accept it as it is written?

I do accept it **as it is written**, Gary. In my view, it is you who 
does not accept it as written, insisting instead on applying your 
anachronistic definition. Remember, the office of high priest did not 
exist at the time Joseph Smith translated Alma's words.

 I mean, there are different MP titles given in the BoM, even
 though I grant they aren't exactly the same as we have today
 (obviously teacher was an office in the MP for the Nephites).

Though this is off the main thread, it's an interesting side thread. I 
don't agree that teacher was a Melchizedek Priesthood office for the 
Nephites; the Melchizedek Priesthood was not generally held among the 
Jews, so I don't see why it would have been generally held among the 
Nephites, who were after all Jews and who were therefore under the law 
of Moses. If teacher was a Priesthood office, I expect it pertained to 
the Aaronic Priesthood; however, my supposition is that it was not a 
Priesthood office at all, but more like what we today would call a 
calling. In other words, a teacher was simply one who was authorized 
to teach.

 And are you trying to tell me that Abraham's desire to be a
 high priest just means he wanted to hold the MP?

Yes. This is *exactly* what I'm saying.

 Why didn't he just say he desired to be a priesthood holder, then?

He did. He said that he wanted to be a holder of the Priesthood of the 
patriarchs, the high Priesthood. That is, he wanted to be a high priest. 
That's not a Priesthood office, it's a holder of the Priesthood.

 Why do we have to twist his terms, when they are clear enough
 without redefining them?

Because you are using an anachronistic application of the terms.

 Finally, we are told that there will be an ordination to become
 a god, that we will be set apart as kings and priests. Since
 you already hold the MP as an elder, why must one be reordained
 a priest?

Let me turn the question back on you. Since you already hold the office 
of high priest, why must you be reordained a priest? Or are you 
suggesting that, as a high priest, you have no further need to be 
ordained a king and priest in the eternities, because you've already 
received all you need?

 BTW, I'm not teaching false doctrine.

Nor did I say you were. I said that if the doctrine you preach were 
taught (note the subjunctive) as gospel, it would be false doctrine. I 
assume you are not teaching this speculation as gospel, so therefore 
it's not false doctrine. It's just speculation -- 

RE: [ZION] High Priests

2002-10-24 Thread Stephen Beecroft
Gary, all this side discussion about Alma 13 and such is interesting 
enough, and I'm happy enough to continue it -- though I suspect that, 
upon review of the relevant teachings and a careful rereading of Alma's 
words, you will agree that Alma 13 is much more inclusive than you've 
been thinking, and that it in fact applies to all Melchizedek Priesthood 
holders, not simply those who hold the administrative Priesthood office 
of high priest.

But the central question remains: Where do you derive your doctrine that 
all men must eventually hold the Melchizedek Priesthood office of high 
priest in order to receive exaltation? That's the genesis of this 
thread, and I have yet to see any evidence that this doctrine exists in 
holy writ, or that it is taught by, approved by, or even believed by the 
general authorities.

Stephen

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] High Priest

2002-10-24 Thread larry . jackson
Stephen Beecroft:

-Larry-
 You're welcome.  It came from the Handbook, which I don't 
 think has changed in this regard.

I wish I could find that bishop and ask him for a clarification. 
I am sure he had (and read) the GHI, and I am also sure 
that he would never intentionally have passed along such a 
blunder. Either I misunderstood him (possible, but it seemed 
pretty clear at the time), or else he had a massive brain lapse, 
or just said one thing when he meant another.

___

He may have meant the ordination of bishop, or it could just 
as easily have been the brain lapse.  I've had lots of those, 
both as a bishop and in almost every other calling I've had. 
[grin]

Just before I was set apart the second time to be bishop, 
the stake president got out the Handbook and looked to 
make sure he didn't need to ordain me again.  

I always preferred to look in the Handbook beforehand, so 
that I would already know the answer.  But that was just 
my particular style.  It works just as well either way.  

The problems often come when somebody doesn't look.  [smile]

Larry Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] Calling of Stake Presidents

2002-10-24 Thread larry . jackson
Paul Osborne:

Right. The Lord is behind the whole thing. That is what I 
have been saying all along.

___

You have been taking lessons from John, haven't you!  :-)

On one occasion I watched visiting general authorities 
interview well into the evening looking for a new stake 
president.  They finally found him, the 2nd counselor of a 
branch in a far-off corner of the stake.

On another occasion, the visiting authority got up on Sunday 
morning and said he hadn't found the new stake president.  
A man who was out of town was called a week later.

In bishopric meeting one morning, we selected a new 
Relief Society president.  The bishop said he would call 
her during the day so she could be sustained right away.

I conducted sacrament meeting that afternoon.  When it 
was time to present the business, I asked the bishop how 
the call had gone.  He said he had totally forgotten to visit 
with the sister.  After sacrament meeting, we met again 
to review the list of names under consideration.  We had 
left one name off the list.  She was sustained the following 
week and served marvelously for many years.

As a branch president conducting sacrament meeting, I 
once sustained the wrong person to be Sunday School 
president.  He appeared startled when I presented his 
name, but after he thought about it for a few seconds, he 
raised his hand to sustain himself.  When I sat down, my 
counselors pointed out that I had called someone else to 
that calling, not the man sustained.

I met the other man as he returned from a business trip 
that evening, explained what had happened, and extended 
a different calling to him.  He was relieved.  He said he had 
been willing to serve and had accepted the Sunday School 
call, but thought he would do much better in the new calling.  
He did.  And so did the man who was actually sustained.

And then there are some of the callings I have had.  The 
Lord does have a sense of humor.

Larry Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^