[Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and pondered how
to make them available to more people. I decided to send them to this list on
a 'problem' level.

The 'problem' level sends a message when a builder changes from a good state
to a bad state but doesn't send a new message on subsequent failing builds.

For me this has been reasonably quiet over the last two weeks although about
60 builders are broken.

The risk of sending mail here is that a massive build failure can cause about
200 messages being send at once. If anybody knows a better approach with
buildbot, please let me know, I'd be happy to implement it.

For everyone else: please have a look at the list of broken builds:
http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/cruise

If a project that you feel responsible for is broken, please check out whats
wrong and maybe fix it. If the build environment isn't suitable, I'll be happy
to help. This page should show a green bar!

Christian


-- 
Christian Theune · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 6. Juni 2008 08:23:40 +0200 Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and pondered
how to make them available to more people. I decided to send them to this
list on a 'problem' level.

The 'problem' level sends a message when a builder changes from a good
state to a bad state but doesn't send a new message on subsequent failing
builds.

For me this has been reasonably quiet over the last two weeks although
about 60 builders are broken.

The risk of sending mail here is that a massive build failure can cause
about 200 messages being send at once. If anybody knows a better approach
with buildbot, please let me know, I'd be happy to implement it.

For everyone else: please have a look at the list of broken builds:
http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/cruise




A minor usability  suggestion:

please provide links at the top of the page for every top-level namespace 
that would setup the filter for this namespace.


Andreas

pgpWwlSf7m9np.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re[2]: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello,

Not this one, but I added some features on the branch:

svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/gocept.bsquare/branches/pcardune-setup

Friday, June 6, 2008, 8:35:57 AM, you wrote:

AJ A minor usability  suggestion:

AJ please provide links at the top of the page for every top-level namespace
AJ that would setup the filter for this namespace.

AJ Andreas


-- 
Best regards,
 Adam GROSZERmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Quote of the day:
There's nothing so pathetic as a forgetful liar. 
- Unknown 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SQLAlchemy (zope.sqlalchemy) integration

2008-06-06 Thread Hermann Himmelbauer
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2008 19:38 schrieb Laurence Rowe:
 Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2008 22:09 schrieb Laurence Rowe:
  Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
  In my application, I then use getSASession() to retrieve my session.
 
  However, what I think is not that beautiful is the s.bind = engine
  part. Are there any suggestions how to improve this?
 
  You have two options
 
  If you ever need to mix objects from different `sites` into the same
  session, you should use an adapter on your root object like:
 
  If you don't need to mix objects from different `sites` then you can
  register a local utility for ISessionConfig.
 
  def scope():
 return getUtility(ISessionConfig).uid, thread.get_ident()
 
  def factory():
 engine = Engine(getUtility(ISessionConfig).url)
 return create_session(
   transactional=True, autoflush=True, bind=engine
   extension=ZopeTransactionExtension(),
   ))
 
  Session = scoped_session(factory, scopefunc=scope)
 
  Then you can just import Session and use:
  session = Session()
 
  Ok, great, thanks for help. The only thing I don't understand is what
  uid from the SessionConfig utility is. Below is my full database
  integration code which works for me, perhaps this is helpful to someone
  else.

 uid is some id that distinguishes your various application instances. On
 zope 2 I would probably use getPhysicalPath(). I don't know what the
 zope3 equivalent is.

Hmmm, maybe it's:

from zope.traversing.api import getPath
from zope.app.component.hooks import getSite
@property
def uid(self):
return getPath(getSite())

 Looking at your code, why did you decide to store the engine on a _v_
 attribute? I don't think you need to save it at all. You can access a
 connection through session.connection()

Ok, but in case I create the engine in the session_factor, e.g.:

def session_factory():
engine = createEngine()
return create_session(transactional = True,
  autoflush = True,
  bind = engine,
  extension = ZopeTransactionExtension())

Wouldn't the engine be created for every request, as the scope changes and the 
factory is called? In my case, the engine is created when the first session 
is fetched. After that it will be recreated only if the DSN changes.

  Btw., I'd suggest to put such code / session use cases in some Zope
  package, maybe into zope.sqlalchemy, or e.g. zope.sqlalchemy_utility as
  it's really difficult for non-insiders to set this up.

 We would need to work out what parts are useful to the various higher
 level sqlalchemy / zope packages. Once we can agree on a common core
 then we should at least make simple use cases available through
 zope.sqlalchemy directly.

In my scenario, all I need is a local utility. This is something that was 
available in z3c.zalchemy, too (and I think also in z3c.sqlalchemy).
The problem about putting this code into zope.sqlalchemy is that the 
local-utility code may be based on other zope packages and hence create 
unwanted dependencies. But I'm unsure about this.

Best Regards,
Hermann

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers)
FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9  4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster
Hey Christian.  Thanks for this.  It would be nice to have a link from  
this page to the failure output (to address works for me issues, as  
well as for a quick triage).


Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster


On Jun 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Gary Poster wrote:

Hey Christian.  Thanks for this.  It would be nice to have a link  
from this page to the failure output (to address works for me  
issues, as well as for a quick triage).


...but I found 'em by digging around on the site, so, mostly nevermind.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] fast_listen - fast-listen for 2.11

2008-06-06 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:55:43PM +0200, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
 No, fast-listen is new in Zope 2.11.

 Stefan

 On 06.06.2008, at 07:49, Christian Theune wrote:

 Hmm. Was this around in 2.10 already?

Then it's a +1 from me.


-- 
Christian Theune · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Benji York
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and pondered how
 to make them available to more people.

We really need something like this.  Thanks.

A suggestion: I'd like to have the tests run with --all.
-- 
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope on zc.ngi

2008-06-06 Thread ct
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of zc.ngi on Zope.
Full details are available at:
 http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/zc.ngi/builds/96

Buildbot URL: http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/

Buildslave for this Build: local

Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'zc.ngi nightly' triggered this build
Build Source Stamp: [branch zc.ngi/trunk] HEAD
Blamelist: 

BUILD FAILED: failed test
Logs are attached.

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

Abuild/todo.txt
Abuild/bootstrap.py
Abuild/buildout.cfg
Abuild/setup.py
Abuild/src
Abuild/src/zc
Abuild/src/zc/__init__.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/blocking.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/adapters.txt
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/message.txt
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/async.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/testing.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/__init__.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/blocking.txt
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/tests.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/adapters.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/interfaces.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/README.txt
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/async.txt
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/message.py
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/testing.test
Abuild/src/zc/ngi/wordcount.py
Abuild/README.txt
 U   build
Checked out revision 87191.
Creating directory '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/bin'.
Creating directory '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/parts'.
Creating directory '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/develop-eggs'.
Generated script '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/bin/buildout'.
Upgraded:
  zc.buildout version 1.0.3,
  setuptools version 0.6c8;
restarting.
Generated script '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/bin/buildout'.
Develop: '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/.'
Installing test.
Generated script '/home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/bin/test'.
Running unit tests:


Failure in test /home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/src/zc/ngi/async.txt
Failed doctest test for async.txt
  File /home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/src/zc/ngi/async.txt, line 0

--
File /home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/src/zc/ngi/async.txt, line 
161, in async.txt
Failed example:
print loghandler
Expected:
zc.ngi.async.client ERROR
  handle_input failed
Got:
BLANKLINE
--
File /home/ctheune/zope.org/slave/zc.ngi/build/src/zc/ngi/async.txt, line 
165, in async.txt
Failed example:
handler.closed
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
/home/ctheune/eggs/tmpY8_5rK/zope.testing-3.5.1-py2.4.egg/zope/testing/doctest.py,
 line 1356, in __run

  File doctest async.txt[37], line 1, in ?
handler.closed
AttributeError: LameClientConnectionHandler instance has no attribute 
'closed'

  Ran 70 tests with 1 failures and 0 errors in 4.978 seconds.
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster


On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Benji York wrote:

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:
I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and  
pondered how

to make them available to more people.


We really need something like this.  Thanks.

A suggestion: I'd like to have the tests run with --all.


Heh, I was going to try and fix a time-out failure (zc.blist) by  
moving the intentionally long tests to --all...maybe there would be  
some way to say don't run me with --all?  Otherwise don't love this  
idea, though I understand its point.


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Re: SQLAlchemy (zope.sqlalchemy) integration

2008-06-06 Thread Laurence Rowe

Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:

Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2008 19:38 schrieb Laurence Rowe:

Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:

Am Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2008 22:09 schrieb Laurence Rowe:

Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:

In my application, I then use getSASession() to retrieve my session.

However, what I think is not that beautiful is the s.bind = engine
part. Are there any suggestions how to improve this?

You have two options

If you ever need to mix objects from different `sites` into the same
session, you should use an adapter on your root object like:

If you don't need to mix objects from different `sites` then you can
register a local utility for ISessionConfig.

def scope():
   return getUtility(ISessionConfig).uid, thread.get_ident()

def factory():
   engine = Engine(getUtility(ISessionConfig).url)
   return create_session(
 transactional=True, autoflush=True, bind=engine
 extension=ZopeTransactionExtension(),
 ))

Session = scoped_session(factory, scopefunc=scope)

Then you can just import Session and use:
session = Session()

Ok, great, thanks for help. The only thing I don't understand is what
uid from the SessionConfig utility is. Below is my full database
integration code which works for me, perhaps this is helpful to someone
else.

uid is some id that distinguishes your various application instances. On
zope 2 I would probably use getPhysicalPath(). I don't know what the
zope3 equivalent is.


Hmmm, maybe it's:

from zope.traversing.api import getPath
from zope.app.component.hooks import getSite
@property
def uid(self):
return getPath(getSite())


Looking at your code, why did you decide to store the engine on a _v_
attribute? I don't think you need to save it at all. You can access a
connection through session.connection()


Ok, but in case I create the engine in the session_factor, e.g.:

def session_factory():
engine = createEngine()
return create_session(transactional = True,
  autoflush = True,
  bind = engine,
  extension = ZopeTransactionExtension())

Wouldn't the engine be created for every request, as the scope changes and the 
factory is called? In my case, the engine is created when the first session 
is fetched. After that it will be recreated only if the DSN changes.


The engines are created the same number of times either way. 
zope.sqlalchemy uses session.close() rather than session.remove(), so 
the session/engine is only created once per thread, then recycled. This 
is the same as storing it on a _v_ attribute, which are per thread as 
active objects live in the connection cache.


Laurence

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Benji York
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Benji York wrote:

 A suggestion: I'd like to have the tests run with --all.

 Heh, I was going to try and fix a time-out failure (zc.blist) by moving the
 intentionally long tests to --all...maybe there would be some way to say
 don't run me with --all?  Otherwise don't love this idea, though I
 understand its point.

I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a level
to run the tests at.  Then buildbot could run all tests at level X and
below and you could put the truly long-running tests above X.
-- 
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Fred Drake
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a level
 to run the tests at.  Then buildbot could run all tests at level X and
 below and you could put the truly long-running tests above X.

Another approach would be to have the buildbot run a bin/buildbot-test
instead of bin/test, if present.  That let's the package suggest what
makes sense for running under buildbot without having to get people to
agree on how levels are used (a more complicated issue).


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake at gmail.com
Chaos is the score upon which reality is written. --Henry Miller
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster


On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Fred Drake wrote:


On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a  
level
to run the tests at.  Then buildbot could run all tests at level X  
and

below and you could put the truly long-running tests above X.


Another approach would be to have the buildbot run a bin/buildbot-test
instead of bin/test, if present.  That let's the package suggest what
makes sense for running under buildbot without having to get people to
agree on how levels are used (a more complicated issue).


Huh, that sounds like it might be easy-ish for Christian, putting the  
responsibility where it arguably should be, on the package  
maintainer.  +1, if Christian says it's easy for him.


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Conflict Errors

2008-06-06 Thread Dieter Maurer
Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-6-5 10:46 -0400:

On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:


 On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:52 AM, David Otero Figueroa wrote:

 I would like to know:
 - Can conflict errors appear when reading objects from the ZODB?

 Yes


Gaaa. I meant no.

Nevertheless, I think you have been right in the first place.

Usually, MVCC prevents read conflict errors but TempStorage
only maintains a very limited history -- occasionally to small
to fully implement MVCC. Then read conflict errors will occur.



-- 
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Conflict Errors

2008-06-06 Thread Jim Fulton


On Jun 6, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:


Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-6-5 10:46 -0400:


On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:



On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:52 AM, David Otero Figueroa wrote:


I would like to know:
- Can conflict errors appear when reading objects from the ZODB?


Yes



Gaaa. I meant no.


Nevertheless, I think you have been right in the first place.

Usually, MVCC prevents read conflict errors but TempStorage
only maintains a very limited history -- occasionally to small
to fully implement MVCC. Then read conflict errors will occur.



Sure. The right answer is generally, no. :)

Jim

--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope on ZODB

2008-06-06 Thread ct
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ZODB on Zope.
Full details are available at:
 http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/ZODB/builds/122

Buildbot URL: http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/

Buildslave for this Build: local

Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'ZODB nightly' triggered this build
Build Source Stamp: [branch ZODB/trunk] HEAD
Blamelist: 

BUILD FAILED: failed test
Logs are attached.

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

Abuild/HISTORY.txt
Abuild/log.ini
Abuild/LICENSE.txt
Abuild/bootstrap.py
Abuild/buildout.cfg
Abuild/doc
Abuild/doc/HOWTO-Blobs-NFS.txt
Abuild/doc/zodb.pdf
Abuild/doc/zeo-client-cache.txt
Abuild/doc/zeo.txt
Abuild/doc/storage.pdf
Abuild/doc/guide
Abuild/doc/guide/links.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/introduction.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/chatter.py
Abuild/doc/guide/prog-zodb.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/indexing.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/TODO
Abuild/doc/guide/storages.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/admin.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/modules.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/transactions.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/gfdl.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/zeo.tex
Abuild/doc/guide/README
Abuild/doc/guide/zodb.tex
Abuild/doc/zeo-client-cache-tracing.txt
Abuild/COPYRIGHT.txt
Abuild/release.py
Abuild/setup.py
Abuild/src
Abuild/src/persistent
Abuild/src/persistent/cPickleCache.c
Abuild/src/persistent/ring.c
Abuild/src/persistent/mapping.py
Abuild/src/persistent/TimeStamp.c
Abuild/src/persistent/DEPENDENCIES.cfg
Abuild/src/persistent/ring.h
Abuild/src/persistent/__init__.py
Abuild/src/persistent/py24compat.h
Abuild/src/persistent/wref.py
Abuild/src/persistent/SETUP.cfg
Abuild/src/persistent/tests
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_PickleCache.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_list.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_mapping.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/persistenttestbase.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/__init__.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_persistent.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/testPersistent.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_wref.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_overriding_attrs.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/test_pickle.py
Abuild/src/persistent/tests/persistent.txt
Abuild/src/persistent/list.py
Abuild/src/persistent/cPersistence.c
Abuild/src/persistent/interfaces.py
Abuild/src/persistent/dict.py
Abuild/src/persistent/README.txt
Abuild/src/persistent/cPersistence.h
Abuild/src/ZopeUndo
Abuild/src/ZopeUndo/tests
Abuild/src/ZopeUndo/tests/testPrefix.py
Abuild/src/ZopeUndo/tests/__init__.py
Abuild/src/ZopeUndo/Prefix.py
Abuild/src/ZopeUndo/__init__.py
Abuild/src/BTrees
Abuild/src/BTrees/_OOBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/BTreeItemsTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/IOBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/OIBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/intvaluemacros.h
Abuild/src/BTrees/sorters.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/OLBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/__init__.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/OOBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/py24compat.h
Abuild/src/BTrees/BucketTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/floatvaluemacros.h
Abuild/src/BTrees/intkeymacros.h
Abuild/src/BTrees/_IFBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/Development.txt
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/testBTreesUnicode.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/test_check.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/testSetOps.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/__init__.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/test_btreesubclass.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/testConflict.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/testLength.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/testBTrees.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/tests/test_compare.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/_LFBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/SetOpTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/_LLBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/LFBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/_OLBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/MergeTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/BTreeTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/LLBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/fsBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/LOBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/BTreeModuleTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/DEPENDENCIES.cfg
Abuild/src/BTrees/TreeSetTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/SETUP.cfg
Abuild/src/BTrees/objectvaluemacros.h
Abuild/src/BTrees/_IIBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/check.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/IFBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/SetTemplate.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/Length.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/_OIBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/_IOBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/IIBTree.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/Interfaces.py
Abuild/src/BTrees/_fsBTree.c
Abuild/src/BTrees/objectkeymacros.h
Abuild/src/BTrees/_LOBTree.c
Abuild/src/CHANGES.txt
Abuild/src/ZEO
Abuild/src/ZEO/CommitLog.py
Abuild/src/ZEO/StorageServer.py
Abuild/src/ZEO/DEPENDENCIES.cfg
Abuild/src/ZEO/__init__.py
Abuild/src/ZEO/scripts
Abuild/src/ZEO/scripts/manual_tests
Abuild/src/ZEO/scripts/manual_tests/testzeopack.py
Abuild/src/ZEO/scripts/parsezeolog.py
A