Re: [9fans] SCMs

On 2/14/18, Dave MacFarlane wrote: > > https://www.github.com/driusan/dgit/ > > It's written in Go, which means it'll only work on platforms that Go > supports (I think there's a list somewhere on the Go wiki, but it's some > subset of 386/arm/amd64 depending on which fork

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

On Feb 14, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Rui Carmo wrote: > On 14 Feb 2018, at 00:31, s...@9front.org wrote: > >> 1.) is the wrong approach. Just build inside Plan 9. > > You missed the rest of the thread. I read the entire thread but I didn’t see this point specifically addressed.

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

I am still using and maintaining 9atom.  I just have a busy schedule so read the list less.- erikOn Feb 11, 2018 14:48, Benjamin Huntsman wrote: > 9atom and 9front are both actively maintained. It seems like 9atom is not actually actively maintained any

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018, at 11:32 AM, hiro wrote: > git has a bad user interface, it is not made for casual users. > I've been using it casually for a couple of weeks, it's been bearable. Perhaps that's because one of the repos only has occasional commits from one other person, and the other is

Re: [9fans] ReMarkable!

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Camolês wrote: > > I understand the sunken cost fallacy, but seriously, there's a reason > handwriting on tablets is not that much used despite the existence of > softwares for such. It can be useful when it comes to short annotations, but > it's really

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > 2018-02-12 14:05 GMT+01:00 Ethan Grammatikidis : > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > >> 2018-02-12 2:10 GMT+01:00 Ethan Grammatikidis : > >>> linux-style package managers and

Re: [9fans] SCMs

On Feb 14, 2018 02:22, "Rui Carmo" wrote: > On 14 Feb 2018, at 01:47, Bakul Shah wrote: > > Dave MacFarlane's git client (dgit) does a decent job on plan9. This interests me greatly. Last time I checked there wasn’t a good enough got client, so I

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

git has a bad user interface, it is not made for casual users.

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

On 2/14/18, Steve Simon wrote: > > re git frowned upon. > > i think git is frowned upon because porting it would be a massive effort due > to its many dependencies, whist python has been ported and mercurial just > works. > It's a shame, cause GIT itself is mostly C, no doubt

Re: [9fans] There is no fork

re git frowned upon. i think git is frowned upon because porting it would be a massive effort due to its many dependencies, whist python has been ported and mercurial just works. -Steve > On 13 Feb 2018, at 23:37, Rui Carmo wrote: > > > >>> On 13 Feb 2018, at

Re: [9fans] SCMs

fyi i spoke too soon, the labs website went a while ago, but the sources machine has returned, well i was able to access it last week. last chance (i suspect) for those wanting to download the contrib dirs before they disappear - i got mine  -Steve On 13 Feb 2018, at 23:13, Lyndon