Sure. Thanks.
BR
Zahed
On 2021-03-26, 15:08, "Seitz Ludwig" wrote:
Hello Zahed,
If it's ok with you I'll fix that in conjunction with the IETF-editor
review (they will probably find a few more like this).
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Hello Zahed,
If it's ok with you I'll fix that in conjunction with the IETF-editor review
(they will probably find a few more like this).
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker
> Sent: den 26 mars 2021 15:04
> To: Seitz Ludwig ; The IESG
> Cc: ace-cha...@ietf.org;
Thanks for the update. My comments are addressed now.
Found a nit : It is RECOMMENDED that an AS reject a request
containing a symmetric key value in the 'req_cnf' field
(kty=Symmetric), since the AS is expected to be able to generate
better symmetric keys than a constrained
Hello Lars,
Thank you for your review. Your issues have been fixed in -14.
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker
> Sent: den 25 mars 2021 12:11
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-ace-oauth-par...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
> Subject:
Hello Murray,
Thank you for your review. The issues you pointed out have been fixed in -14.
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
> Sent: den 25 mars 2021 04:57
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-ace-oauth-par...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Hello Zaheduzzaman,
Thank you for your review. The issues you found are now fixed in version -14.
Note that there seems to be an problem with xml2rfc, since the outdated
reference to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33 should have been taken care of by
the tooling.
I have notified the maintainer of
Hello Elwyn,
Thank you for you review. I have fixed the nit you pointed out in the new
version of the draft (-14).
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
> Sent: den 23 mars 2021 23:53
> To: gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc: ace@ietf.org;
