Hi all,
where can i download TSM software for windows 2000.
most urgent.
thanks in advance.
sreekumar.
Hi Richard!
You are right, except for the TDS manuals, they're still at 4.1...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 16:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDS 4.2
4.2
Hi Sreekumar!
You can download it from the location where one always downloads the latest
client code: http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adsercli.htm
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Pothula S Paparao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
how can you tell when files are part of an aggregate ?
From http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts :
Aggregated? In ADSMv3 'Query CONtent ...
Format=Detailed': Reveals whether or not
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:48:31 -0400, you wrote:
But doesn't a complete install lead you to believe that the services for
the web client will be installed? Even if we do a custom install and select
the web client the services (Client acceptor and Remote Client) do not get
installed.
No. An
Hello,
I can't find this problem in the archive
so I hope somebody on the list can
answer this...
One of our customers has a Windows NT
client which has been upgraded to 4.2.0.0
(I'm pretty sure the previous level
was 3.1)
After the upgrade the following message
appeared in the log file:
Does TDP 2.1.10 for NT support Oracle 8.1.6 or do I need TDP 2.2?
Hanna Hahne
Hanna Hahne email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDV (R0100) Tel.: 06221 42 2357
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Fax:06221 42 2399
Im Neuenheimer Feld 280
I am attempting to use the web client to access a Microsoft cluster node.
I'm using the latest client versions and am getting good backups from both
the local node and the cluster node. I've also sucessfully configured the
web client to work with the local node. Has anyone had any luck getting
Have they provided a root cause and resolution to anyone on the cuSignOnResp
issue or are we still just opening and closing PMRs? It is not very
practical to manager security on 1,000 admin IDs.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
We are running TSM 3.7.3 on OS/390 2.8. We are getting ready to upgrade our tape
drives from model B's to model E's. IBM says that the upgraded drives will read the
old tapes just fine, but will write them at the new density. I am unable to determine
what, if anything, I need to do to
Definitely go thru the archives on this one...there is alot of good
information out there
Also review this email
-Original Message-
From: Louis Wiesemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM and 3590E Tapes
We are
How do I change my subscription address... I'm changing companies and I'd
like to continue receiving this content.
Thank you,
Jeff Caffey
Enterprise Systems Programmer
(AIX Storage Administrator)
Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (817) 252-6222
Fax:
When we did this on AIX, every 3590B cartridge became READ-ONLY. Depending
on the size of your scratch pool, you can either let them migrate to 3590E
via gradual reclamation, which you can speed along by setting a relatively
low reclamation value, or by run MOVE DATA on every 3590B volume you
Well, I just been informed by support that Oracle 8.1.7 is only supported
on v2.2. The documentation for v2.1.10 it says it will support 8.1.5. The
Redbook SG24-624900 Oracle Backup Solutions for TSM (May 2001) has
all of the screen captures (e.g. see pg 61, very beginning of Chapter 5)
show
Unsubscribe then subscribe from your new account..
look on http://msgs.adsm.org/maillist.html for details.
-Original Message-
From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2001 16:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Change subscription address
How do I change my
Just setup at new storage tape pool and force the B tape storage pool to
migrate to it by updating the nextpool, hi, and lo.
Change the nextpool for any disk pool to point to the new storage pool. Are
you going to double density tapes or double length also. If you are going
to double length,
Thanks. I just sent an email query for the archives. I had been trying to seach them
from the web, but had no luck. The LSOFT pages show a web archive link at:
vm.marist.edu/htbin/wa
but when I try to link to it I can't get connected. Is there really a web interface
for ADSM-L archives?
I've had this happen in the past but this time is different.
I do NOT receive any errors except the following:
ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library TEKWOLF failed.
ANR0985I Process 25 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the
BACKGROUND completed with completion state
My guess would be that there is a mismatch between the internal label and barcode.
Just a guess though..
Larry Way
408-743-4242 Desk
408-655-3512 Cell
408-743-4201 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/10/01 08:25AM
I've had this happen in the past but this time is different.
I do NOT receive any
Yes, point your favorite browser to
www.adsm.org
and search to your heart's content!
lisa
Louis Wiesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/10/2001 10:18 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT)
Subject:
I encounted this problem on a 3575. We upgraded Atape and the problem went
away..
Thanks and Have a Great Day
Doug Hewerdine
I/T Specialist
RS/6000 AIX Advanced Technical Expert
IBM Global Services
Outside Line (972) 280-3298
T/L 542-3298
Marc Levitan
Hello all,
I am looking through the contents of some tapes that I would have
expected to be empty yet still have active data. I come up with the
following questions after looking at the data that is still on the tape.
1) If I move a node from one POLICY to another, does the expiration of
If i run a audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode it completes
successfully. It's when the audit actually mounts the volumes to check the
labels that it fails.
any ideas?
Marc - If you're lucky, those are new volumes that were inserted without
having been labeled. Otherwise they may
Yeah but would they show up in q libv if they were not labeled?
It is not a shared library...
Thanks,
Marc
Richard Sims
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
ADSM: Dist
For #3, after the db2adutl command tells TSM to delete the file, it is kept
for the Retain Last Version number of days, per the management class it's
bound to. 90 days is a common number there (for me, at least), so that
means you're keeping 90 versions more than you need to. You can fix this
At 11:25 AM 7/10/01 -0400, you wrote:
If i run a audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode it completes
successfully. It's when the audit actually mounts the volumes to check the
labels that it fails.
any ideas?
I seem to remember a similar error happening to me. A vendor was in to do
Yes, they would show up in a q libvol. Look in the actlog for a failed
label libvol command.
If you try to read or write an unlabeled tape, it will give an I/O error and
a sense code possibly (00.00.00.77)
ADSM support can determine what the sense code data means. 77 apparently
means the
I have been at my present job for a year and the audit library command
fails EVERY time when it tries to read the labels. It will read some and
then, I suspect it can't keep up and fails in exactly the manner you noted.
I am on a 3575L32 at 3.7.3.6. I spoke with Tivoli about it and they claimed
I
To fix this problem, I deleted all AIX devices and ADSM and then re-add
each; cfgmgr on AIX then define drive in ADSM.
We had this problem when SCSI drives were swapped also. A lscfg -vl rmt1
will show the serial number of the tape drive, and AIX expects this to be
correct or you have got
VERSIONS DATA EXIST and RETAIN EXTRA VERSIONS both refer to 'active' files,
files still on the client. If you have EXISTS set to (nolimit) then the
number of copies of a 'active' file is determined by RETAIN EXTRA VERSIONS.
VERSIONS DATA DELETED and RETAIN ONLY VERSION refer to 'inactive' files,
I have been at my present job for a year and the audit library command
fails EVERY time when it tries to read the labels. ...
George - Were the tapes introduced as pre-labeled by the tape vendor,
or did you run a labeling job; and if so, was the labeling
done under the current release
Thanks. One thing I'm not clear on is whether I need to set the old B tapes to
readonly or can I let TSM do it for me. IBM says that the new drives will not write
over a non-scratch tape in the old format. When TSM calls for an output tape and the
drive detects the old format will it
Richard, We (I) labeled all tapes in the library. They are NOT prelabeled.
George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/10/2001 01:08:09 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Chris,
I opened a problem ticket with Tivoli back in Oct 2000 for this problem.
Tivoli Opened an APAR against this problem. I do not believe the problem
was been resolved in any of the clients to this date. You may want to
look at the existing APARS.
Arturo Lopez
Storage
Have you tried using tapeutil to do inventory? I think it just reads barcode from
internal memory of library. I have TSM 3.7.4.0 with 3575-L32. Always use audit
library 3575lib1 checklabel=barcode as this only takes about 20 seconds. Reading
tapes would take a looong time. Do not have
I have an internal client that has requested we notify his group should they
end up with multiple versions of files.
The reason is that they are static workpapers for auditing and there are
legal and liability issues that could be connected to papers that have
changed once filed.
We were using
Well, based on the library, even if you specify checklabel=yes it still
won't mount a volume.
Example, with an IBM3494 with an AIX tsm server will only verify things such
as if the category of the tape within the library manager is correct (and
exists within the atl naturally) it won't physically
Its query proc
give this cmd when it starts expiring.
balanand pinni
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: things NOT expiring
Is there an easy way to see how many copies of a file that
I/O hotspot on hdisk4? Maybe spread the I/O out?
What maintenance level is the OS at?
[RC]
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:46:30PM -0700, Chuck Lam wrote:
Server: M80 running AIX 4.3.3, 4GB RAM, 768MB ps
DiskStoragePool, Rlog, Database on all on a
SAN via fibre channel
Hi all,
one of our customer has terrible reclamation, move data and audit volume
performance on 3583 LTO library - about 40 MB/hour of reclaimed data
wvhole reclamation of one volume take "week", although backup and
restore operations goes at normal speed (seconds for megabytes). Any ideas?
40 matches
Mail list logo
