What Steve Jones said...
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 3:03 PM Steve Jones wrote:
> you can do ethernet between the buildings and fiber media converters on
> them with a short patch, this isolates the coper. then power the remote
> side media converter with an isolation transformer and youve isolated
My brother is in one in AZ. Bunch of cuckold men striving to have power
because their wife karen immasculates them at home. My brother loves
intimidating the main guy that's always harassing home by just walking at
him the whole time they interact.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 9:04 PM Jaime Solorza
My friend purchased a home last year in an HOA neighborhoodregrets
it..lots of Karens
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 5:22 PM Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
> I view this more to tell HOAs where to stuff it.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 3:30 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
>
>
> That's not
The way I read it you have to feed the customers home with one of the antennas
in order to re-distribute with other antennas on the same roof. I assume this
means that technically I couldn’t order up a fiber circuit to the home to use
to feed other APs on the roof… unless the customer is also
Yeah, more for governing entities like HOAs etc that try to regulate what the
home owner can/wants to do with their own roof/property or access to broadband
for their owned unit.
You couldn’t just pick any random roof and install any random equipment on it
under OTARD. The property owner still
I view this more to tell HOAs where to stuff it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 3:30 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
>
> That's not the way I read it. It prevents state & local governments from
> imposing restrictions, but leaves the decision making up to the people who
> are
That's not the way I read it. It prevents state & local
governments from imposing restrictions, but leaves the decision
making up to the people who are owners/operators.
bp
On 8/25/2021 2:24 PM, Steve Jones
wrote:
Am I reading
Am I reading this shit right? Property owners can be forced to be transmit
locations?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 4:07 PM Jacob Turner wrote:
> Yes:
> https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/25/2021-01304/fcc-modernizes-siting-rule-for-small-hub-and-relay-wireless-antennas
>
> --
>
those look like what we use
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 4:14 PM Nate Burke wrote:
> I just picked up a set of these to see if they fit.
> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NCBTFSW
>
> The problem we run into is the Force300 radio can't have the bracket
> reversed, so when we mount to a steel building,
I just picked up a set of these to see if they fit.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NCBTFSW
The problem we run into is the Force300 radio can't have the bracket
reversed, so when we mount to a steel building, we have to run a
vertical pipe between 2 horizontal girts, but then you sometimes can't
Yes:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/25/2021-01304/fcc-modernizes-siting-rule-for-small-hub-and-relay-wireless-antennas
--
Jacob Turner
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:12 PM Robert Andrews
wrote:
> There was a proposed modification to the FCC "blessings" for permitting
>
you can do ethernet between the buildings and fiber media converters on
them with a short patch, this isolates the coper. then power the remote
side media converter with an isolation transformer and youve isolated the
copper.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 2:05 PM Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
> Could
the gold ones fit most, dont remember the p/n but primus anf perfect vision
carry them. all depends on your j arm foot
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:57 AM wrote:
> If you're going to do the U-bolts, get those jagged V-clamps and put them
> between the J-pipe and the tower. Might be there's an old
There was a proposed modification to the FCC "blessings" for permitting
multiple antennas on residential buildings under OTARD. Did that ever
go anywhere?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Could still be on the same transformer. Power Line Carrier system might
could work. At least if 10-100 Mbps is OK.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Weekley
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 9:53 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: [AFMUG] Sharing internet connection between
Should not be. Ethernet is ethernet. With just the ethernet connection
between the two switches, there would still be no ground connection.
bp
On 8/25/2021 9:56 AM, Jay Weekley wrote:
It's going to be connected to a switch on both ends. Will that be a
problem?
Bill Prince wrote:
Ethernet
All of the DNA services will present you pie-charts concerning your
ethnicity.
YSEQ.net does primarily whole genome DNA research. These guys are
probably the best resource for finding everything you ever wanted to
know about yourself and your family genetics including what drugs may
harm
Powerbox Pro on the outside of the first house. Cat5 ether1 into first
house with a power supply. Plug in customer router there.
Then run fiber from Powerbox Pro to second house.
I do a /32 IP for each customer so I can shut them off individually, all
done in the Tik.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help
Our policy is that the most bulletproof solution is to sell a second
service to the other house.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:39 PM Jay Weekley
wrote:
> The first location is a house with internet and the second location
> needs it. It's not the only way to get the second location on line.
> I'm
The first location is a house with internet and the second location
needs it. It's not the only way to get the second location on line.
I'm just looking for the most bullet proof solution that will minimize
support calls.
Josh Luthman wrote:
That's kind of a basic networking question,
That's kind of a basic networking question, what's the overall topology
look like? Does this second building already have internet and you're back
feeding? Is this fiber connection between the two buildings the only way
the second building gets online?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
We put a surge protector on both ends when we did this. Each one
grounded to the ground rod on it's respective building.
Before we did that we'd blow switch ports with every lightning storm.
After we did that no more blown ports. Maybe Bill's way works too, but
one SS or two SS is not that
It's going to be connected to a switch on both ends. Will that be a problem?
Bill Prince wrote:
Ethernet has no ground reference. It's a differential signal. If
you're using shielded cable, only ground one end (or neither end), and
you'll be fine.
bp
On 8/25/2021 8:53 AM, Jay Weekley
Ethernet has no ground reference. It's a differential signal. If you're
using shielded cable, only ground one end (or neither end), and you'll
be fine.
bp
On 8/25/2021 8:53 AM, Jay Weekley wrote:
I've got a client that needs a network line installed from their house
to another building but
https://store.ui.com/collections/operator-accessories/products/ufiber-ac
tiveethernet
It merely turns the fiber into Ethernet. No need to know anything about
fiber if they have someone come terminate it. No configuration
required.
-Original Message-
From: AF
It's an option but I'm trying to minimize my involvement in the support
department. The do have an IT guy but I'm not sure how familiar he is
with fiber.
Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote:
Jay,
I would do a fiber run between the buildings.
These are nice on both ends
Jay,
I would do a fiber run between the buildings.
These are nice on both ends
https://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-Switching-Capacity-Protection-TEG-S51SFP/dp/B019IHWSF0/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1=Teg-s51sfp=1629908139=8-2
Get some a couple of transceivers and terminated fiber.
--
Best regards,
Mark
Fiber or copper ethernet plug run a 6awg ground cable between breaker
panels.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:54 AM Jay Weekley
wrote:
> I've got a client that needs a network line installed from their house
> to another building but they are on separate power meters. I understand
> that running a
I've got a client that needs a network line installed from their house
to another building but they are on separate power meters. I understand
that running a cable between two different ground points is not
advisable. Is there a way around this? A wireless link isn't an option
at this
Why wouldn't you trust the Marketing Executive? Such an official sounding
title.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 5:22 PM Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
> Tempting, but I think I will pass.
>
> Sent
If you're going to do the U-bolts, get those jagged V-clamps and put them
between the J-pipe and the tower. Might be there's an old or broken antenna
somewhere you can steal them from.
-Original Message-
From: dmmoff...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 10:28 AM
To:
When I did that, I just got a U-Bolt sized for the diameter of the tower leg
and drilled matching holes in the footplate of the J pipe.
But U-bolts don't hold that well IMO. We had a dish clamped like that which
spun around in a windshear. It was still tight when the guy got up there to
re-align
I know they exist, but my Googlefu is failing me. There's a set of
UBolts that are spaced correctly to fit in to the LAG holes on a Jleg so
that you can clamp the foot of a JLeg to a pipe.
The Cambium part number is SGLN6552A, but they are big UBolts for the
outside LAG Holes. Does anyone
33 matches
Mail list logo
