Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

Title: Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE Chuck, How is your PPPoE setup?  We set PPPoE up in our ONT then DHCP the customer's router with a private IP.  That works 99% of the time.  Every once in a while we get a "problem" VPN that just will not work.  In that case we set our system up in bridge mod

Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

It's a pretty good bet that any Pppoe connection is going to have an MTU of 1492 or less... But yeah, any decent VPN client should be able to handle that just fine... and most un-decent ones too, for that matter On Mon, Feb 26, 2018, 6:28 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com>

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

That probe will be connected here on lower left side of back panel...about to test continuity and megg the wires. Jaime Solorza On Feb 26, 2018 2:02 PM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: > Come on up, I have some for ya J you can even stay at my place J > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *

Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

Thanks From: Colin Stanners Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 5:19 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE Very likely MTU/fragmentation issue. If you're using PPPoE you have a smaller MTU (1480 / 1492 bytes), some badly configured VPN endpoints may not accept fragmentation t

Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

Depending on the exact settings in PPPoE it may have a smaller MTU than 'normal ethernet'. Any decent VPN should be able to handle this, however. -forrest On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Had a customer that works from home. Could not make his VPN work. > We thought perh

Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

Sounds like a MTU issue (PMTUD perhaps?). I’m guessing the other side of the VPN was wanting MTU to be 1500 bytes, but due to PPPoE overhead the client won’t ever be able to receive the full 1500 bytes. So it’s sad and won’t work. We use PPPoE and had one customer that couldn’t get to a random

Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

I would try to reproduce the problem first. Could be an MTU issue on the VPN setting. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Had a customer that works from home. Could not make his VPN work. > We thought perhaps it was a port issue. Opened the ports on the Smart > RG. No good.

Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

Very likely MTU/fragmentation issue. If you're using PPPoE you have a smaller MTU (1480 / 1492 bytes), some badly configured VPN endpoints may not accept fragmentation that is necessary on packets below 1500. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Had a customer that works from h

[AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE

Had a customer that works from home. Could not make his VPN work. We thought perhaps it was a port issue. Opened the ports on the Smart RG. No good. He spend $150 over the weekend on a geek squad type of service and they pointed their finger at us. So, just because we haven’t tried it, w

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Come on up, I have some for ya ☺ you can even stay at my place ☺ From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 2:41 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!! Looking for private places to consume the Tecate ! ... h so

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Si senor Jaime Solorza On Feb 26, 2018 1:40 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote: > Looking for private places to consume the Tecate ! ... h so I see... > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > http://www.snappytelecom.net > > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518> > > Help-desk: (305)663-

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Don't bend over On 2/26/2018 1:45 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Oh no...The Probe!!! Jaime Solorza On Feb 26, 2018 12:28 PM, "Jaime Solorza" > wrote: Working inside a tank.. Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Looking for private places to consume the Tecate ! ... h so I see... Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom http://www.snappytelecom.net Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Jaime Solorza" > To: "Animal Farm" > Sent:

[AFMUG] COW trailer - looking to rent or buy

Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 [cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png]

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

some people pay good money for that On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > 4G LTE worked fine in there!!! As for probing...I don't kiss and tell..🤣 > > Jaime Solorza > > On Feb 26, 2018 12:49 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: > > How was the probing? > > *From:* Jaime Solorza > *Sent:*

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Say "Hi!" to Scully. bp On 2/26/2018 12:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: 4G LTE worked fine in there!!! As for probing...I don't kiss and tell..🤣 Jaime Solorza On Feb 26, 2018 12:49 PM, "Chuck McCown" > wrote: How was the probing? *From:* Jaime Solorza *Sent:

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

4G LTE worked fine in there!!! As for probing...I don't kiss and tell..🤣 Jaime Solorza On Feb 26, 2018 12:49 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: How was the probing? *From:* Jaime Solorza *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 12:35 PM *To:* Animal Farm *Subject:* [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!! Working insid

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

How was the probing? From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 12:35 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!! Working inside a tank.. Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Radio waves probably don't propagate very well. bp On 2/26/2018 11:35 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Working inside a tank.. Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

🤕 Jaime Solorza On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza" wrote: > Working inside a tank.. > Jaime Solorza >

Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa c5c 80MHz channel ptp

500 Mbps real world IP traffic, mostly flowing one direction? On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > Usually I run B5-Lites for these and it’s about 680Mbps.Got one that > runs up to 500Mbps every night in just that scenario right now. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

I am highly skeptical, based on my experience with 60 GHz PTP (Bridgewave equipment). The power limits and atmospheric absorption practically limit a PTP path between two 25cm reflector antennas, in this rain climate, to about 600 meters (0.37 miles). You can do more like 800-1000 meters max with a

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

Tried Mikrotik to Ignitenet… no dice From: Af mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Stefan Englhardt mailto:s...@genias.net>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Monday, February 26, 2018 at 12:23 PM To: "af@afmug.com" mailto:af@afm

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

With mesh and beamforming sectors half a mile is realistic Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Colin Stanners Datum: 26.02.18 17:53 (GMT+01:00) An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC Their picture suggesting mult-mile shots on 60Ghz is... extrem

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

Their picture suggesting mult-mile shots on 60Ghz is... extremely optimistic to say it delicately. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Stefan Englhardt wrote: > Would be perfect when ignitenet makes their stuff compatible. Both are > based on WiGIG so should be possible. > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mai

Re: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

Would be perfect when ignitenet makes their stuff compatible. Both are based on WiGIG so should be possible. Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Gino A. Villarini Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2018 17:08 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: [AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

[AFMUG] Radwin Announces mesh 60ghz at MWC

Based on Facebook Terragraph Project https://www.radwin.com/press-room/60ghz-mesh-terragraph Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 [cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png]

Re: [AFMUG] Level 3 railroad duct

Thanks so much. -Original Message- From: Robert Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 8:54 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Level 3 railroad duct I was number 8 at L3, unfortunately the last of the upper level friends I have over there left with change in control #silverparachute

Re: [AFMUG] Level 3 railroad duct

I was number 8 at L3, unfortunately the last of the upper level friends I have over there left with change in control #silverparachute But I'll reach out... On 2/26/18 7:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: About 20 years ago, Level 3 buried 13 ducts along the UPRR here in Utah. I made an inquiry onc

Re: [AFMUG] Level 3 railroad duct

You never know. I've been talking to CenturyLink recently, and I found the enterprise sales person to be very responsive. It's been easier than I imagined it would be. .though I'm not talking about a duct. We're talking about getting connected to one of their long haul sites. This is s

Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

Mostly geared towards CPE use. It can be an AP as well attached to a horn. Jim Bouse Owner Brazos WiFi – Fast and Reliable Internet 979-985-5912 j...@brazoswifi.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 8:47 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject:

Re: [AFMUG] Level 3 railroad duct

CenturyLink bought Level 3, so I don't think you have any better chances now than you did then. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Chuck McCown" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, Februa

[AFMUG] Level 3 railroad duct

About 20 years ago, Level 3 buried 13 ducts along the UPRR here in Utah. I made an inquiry once or twice over the years for access. The IRU was more money than it would take to build it myself. I wonder if that has changed? Anyone have any luck in using any of their ducts? How about getting

Re: [AFMUG] OT Raspberry PI

yeah,, not so much sound like some adtran gear needed On 02/22/2018 05:16 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: I have to generate an alternate mark inversion signal on 1.544 MHz with every 193rd bit following a t1 framing sequence. Sure wish a 555 could do that. *From:* Dave *Sent:* Thursday, February 2

Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

Yes. On February 26, 2018 8:47:12 AM CST, Colin Stanners wrote: >Airfiber5 LTU. Looks like a CPE? > >On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:30 AM, FCC ID Alert wrote: > >> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Ubiquiti Networks, >Inc. for >> New Equipment. >> See FCC ID SWX-AF5LTU >> >

Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

Airfiber5 LTU. Looks like a CPE? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:30 AM, FCC ID Alert wrote: > A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. for > New Equipment. > See FCC ID SWX-AF5LTU >

Re: [AFMUG] testing

Yep, just making sure I get the e-mail here. ☺ Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 5:37 PM To: A