Not even close.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 8:25 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Does anyone have a 28-34dBi 2.4GHz 2x2 MIMO antenna
900mhz PTP450 doesn't give enough bandwidth?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:15 PM,
Well 50MHz will do around 400Mbps. I doubt you'll see that on 900MHz with
their limited channel width.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
> 900mhz PTP450 doesn't give enough bandwidth?
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Rory Conaway
900mhz PTP450 doesn't give enough bandwidth?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Rory Conaway
wrote:
> I’d like to stay out of jail and I’m pretty sure the U.S. Forestry service
> frowns on that.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of
I believe it is working normally with lower VLAN numbers, I'm using 2 and
4. Having said that, I've only tested it in the lab, I don't have any in
the field as of yet.
On Monday, May 15, 2017, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
> Anyone tried VLAN web management access from a remote
Anyone tried VLAN web management access from a remote switch/device yet on the
new hardware/v2.2?
I can't get it to work for the life of me.
It will ping, but never access the web page.
I can tag another port on the RB260GS itself and get it on VLAN, but nothing
else, not from the SFP where
Do you use Google Apps? If so there is an option to use there smtp
relay service.
https://support.google.com/a/answer/2956491?hl=en
There are a few options to setup. I just specify the IP address of my
Mikrotik device I want to allow to send the email. I usually send
such alarms to a google
With the mAmp guage on our pack, it’s obvious if the path is ‘open’. We used
the pigtails off old canopy POEs so the Ethernet doesn’t enter the box.
From: Af on behalf of David Coudron
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com"
Date: Friday,
Have you considered the rigging/hoisting and mounting costs of 8' dishes,
vs chainsaw or doing something more creative in dish location with 2.5'/3'
size dishes to get real LOS?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Rory Conaway
wrote:
> I’ve got to punch through a mile of
I have three CentOS machines on the network in an anycast config all
doing DNS, SMTP and NTP. I'm old school, so it's BIND and Sendmail. All
three have the same local user account/password that the MikroTik's use
for SMTP auth. It's not real complicated.
On 5/15/2017 2:42 PM, Steve Jones
The "W" at the end stands for "weather resistant"
-- Original Message --
From: "George Skorup"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 5/15/2017 4:06:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 14 awg cable source
I've seen cell co's use it. So... it's fine?
On 5/15/2017 2:30 PM, Jason
I've seen cell co's use it. So... it's fine?
On 5/15/2017 2:30 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
Does the sjoow seem to weather ok exposed on a tower?
On Friday, May 12, 2017, George Skorup > wrote:
We've used some regular ol' SJOOW.
Landscape lighting wire is UV rated. 14/2 is less than $.30 /ft.
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Southwire-500-ft-14-2-Black-Stranded-Landscape-Lighting-Cable-55213245/202316236
On 5/15/2017 2:30 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
Does the sjoow seem to weather ok exposed on a tower?
On Friday, May 12,
that's probably what ill end up doing, I just hate exposing an open relay,
even with the ACL to the public side of a firewall
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:38 PM, David Kunat wrote:
> What we do is run a server with postfix as a open relay, except that it is
> locked down to
Does the sjoow seem to weather ok exposed on a tower?
On Friday, May 12, 2017, George Skorup wrote:
> We've used some regular ol' SJOOW. 16AWG would probably be fine for a
> single eNB, since you can only run 100 meters of ethernet anyway.
>
> An alternative would be
What we do is run a server with postfix as a open relay, except that it is
locked down to only accept mail from a whitelist of ip's, which we enter from a
web based interface that we wrote so any of the techs can enter it.
> On May 15, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Adam Moffett
I don't think you can provide a local smtp server on a Mikrotik. I
think you could use a dst-nat rule to point them at another mail server.
ip firewall nat add chain=dstnat protocol=tcp dst-port=25 action=dst-nat
to-addresses=[your mail server of choice] to-ports=252525
-- Original
A trade buddy told a tale once. His wife is a total prankster. She has
the 5 year-old daughter call dad. Something along the lines of, "Dad,
hurry, mommy needs c*ck right now!" He's like whut!? She reiterates.
Nope, he didn't hear that wrong. He gets home all ready to be like WTF
is wrong
Nice clean work!!
On May 15, 2017 7:47 AM, "Mitch Koep" wrote:
> We face them down so if we get water in the
>
> cat5 it runs off to the bottom of the enclosure
>
> and not into the switch.
>
> Mitch
>
> On 05/15/2017 08:43 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
>
> What is the reason for
Yeah, what Mike said is correct - 3dbi increase in antenna gain for every
1dbm decrease in tx power for PtP. so, if you have, say a 24dbi antenna,
you can run 24dbm TX power and get 48db EIRP.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Not for PtP.
>
>
>
> -
>
There is a 3 to 1 rule on PTP. You can set your power at 29dBi with a 9dBi
antenna, 28dBi, 12dBi antenna, and so forth. Since I want a 50MHz channel and
the AF24 needs 60dBi or better for that, I can get up to 54dBi or so with that
antenna and a little line loss. If you don’t have any
We face them down so if we get water in the
cat5 it runs off to the bottom of the enclosure
and not into the switch.
Mitch
On 05/15/2017 08:43 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
What is the reason for facing them down?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Josh Luthman
Not for PtP.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Koep"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 8:44:59 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Does anyone have a 28-34dBi
In the event water gets in the line I'd rather it stay out of the switch.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
> What is the reason for facing them down?
>
> On
What is the reason for facing them down?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Am I the only one that finds facing them down infuriating?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100
Am I the only one that finds facing them down infuriating?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Darin Steffl
wrote:
> We always face the ports down and yes, we mount in a
2.4's policy is what, every 1 dB decrease in transmit power is a 3 dB increase
in allowed EIRP? Decrease Tx power 10 dB, increase EIRP 30 dB?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mitch
That sounds futile. What kind of trees? Can you get any signal through at all
with smaller dishes to gauge how well it will work with larger dishes?
From: Rory Conaway
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 7:23 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Does anyone have a 28-34dBi 2.4GHz 2x2 MIMO antenna
Rory
Won't that be well over legal limits?
Mitch
On 05/15/2017 08:23 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
I’ve got to punch through a mile of trees with AF2x radio so I’m
probably going to for the 6’ or 8’ dishes.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners
*Sent:*
We always face the ports down and yes, we mount in a similar size box like
that where it is flat on the backboard.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> You have the ports facing up? Dang.
>
> I'm doing similar but the ports are facing down.
>
>
>
I’ve got to punch through a mile of trees with AF2x radio so I’m probably going
to for the 6’ or 8’ dishes.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 7:05 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Does anyone have a 28-34dBi 2.4GHz 2x2
You have the ports facing up? Dang.
I'm doing similar but the ports are facing down.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Josh Baird wrote:
> Hard to find one that is deep enough
Read this to my wife. Totally can relate. LoL
From: Af on behalf of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 8:39:50 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mother's day fun
Cough cough... hilarious...
On May
32 matches
Mail list logo