Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-03 Thread Rick Harnish
rd Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 5:21 PM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration the grandfathering protection was probably overrated anyway, since, as far as I know, it only applied to gear that was in the air already at that point... we have very little, if a

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-03 Thread Jason McKemie
..@triadwireless.net> wrote: > >> So what was the purpose of purchasing licenses today? >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rick Harnish >> *Sent:* Monday, April 2, 2018 2:06 PM &

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Steve Jones
ses today? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rick Harnish > *Sent:* Monday, April 2, 2018 2:06 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration > > > > Actually, to get grandfathering protection

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Mathew Howard
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: > So what was the purpose of purchasing licenses today? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rick Harnish > *Sent:* Monday, April 2, 2018 2:06 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subje

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 4/2/18 6:40 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: So what was the purpose of purchasing licenses today? To follow the rules, such as they are.

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Rory Conaway
So what was the purpose of purchasing licenses today? Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 2:06 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration Actually, to get grandfathering protection when the CBRS band opens up

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Mathew Howard
> Rick Harnish > > > > Director of WISP Markets > > > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (260) 307-4000 > > > > rick.harn...@na.baicells.com > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > &

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Rick Harnish
.com <http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 10:29 AM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration If you do an ABAB channel plan, you

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Mathew Howard
> basically we kept doing our own thing and resolving interference cases > individually as they came up. It sounds like some of you have bad > neighbors. > > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> > To: "af" <

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Mathew Howard
Anybody who's doing anything with 3.65ghz should check Comsearch's quicklook tool. https://solutions.comsearch.com/applications/search_3650/search3650MHZ.jsp On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Dave wrote: > At a minimal try to find out who the base station owners are and

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Dave
At a minimal try to find out who the base station owners are and what they are doing because I have seen older C-band station show up as registered sites. Which is ok because they have filters on their gear to notch out what they dont use. If your right in front of the dish it could be an issue

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-02 Thread Dave
Message -- From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> To: "af" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: 3/31/2018 9:48:52 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration From what I've seen, most people are just r

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-04-01 Thread Adam Moffett
interference cases individually as they came up. It sounds like some of you have bad neighbors. -- Original Message -- From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> To: "af" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 3/31/2018 9:48:52 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base r

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-03-31 Thread Mathew Howard
too many folks in the area, it is easier to find open channels > and then register. > > > > > > David Coudron > > > > > > > > *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout > *Sent:* Saturday, March 31, 2018 1:57 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com >

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-03-31 Thread David Coudron
] 3.65 NN base registration I have a NN license but have never used it, what is the best practice/process for registering a base when you have other operators with bases registered nearby? Do you need to coordinate anything? I'm looking at deploying in a small town but 2-3 other operators have

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-03-31 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, you just need to register it... I've never known anyone to try coordinating anything, but at least the database gives you some idea of what else your dealing with. On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 2:07 PM Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 3/31/18 11:57, TJ Trout wrote: > > I have a NN

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-03-31 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 3/31/18 11:57, TJ Trout wrote: I have a NN license but have never used it, what is the best practice/process for registering a base when you have other operators with bases registered nearby? Do you need to coordinate anything? The NN license never really meant anything. It tried to be

[AFMUG] 3.65 NN base registration

2018-03-31 Thread TJ Trout
I have a NN license but have never used it, what is the best practice/process for registering a base when you have other operators with bases registered nearby? Do you need to coordinate anything? I'm looking at deploying in a small town but 2-3 other operators have bases already registered in