Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Uh, no. Definitely not good.
Here's one of mine for comparison. Which is also where I'm having odd
issues with two 3GHz 450 sectors. Not to mention the same problems at
sites with parasitics. I have another SyncInjector at another site
running a 5GHz 450 AP and it works fine. Plus dozens and dozens of
deluxe and parasitics on FSK and 2.4 and 5GHz 450 which all work fine.
So it's not the timing devices. Something about the 3GHz 450 is just
different.
Anyway.. I cleared the events, I forget, maybe a month or two ago after
I cycled the pipe to see if that fixed anything, which it did not. I use
the event counters with Cacti thresholds to alert me when something
happens. I look to see what happened, then I clear the counters to get
the threshold out of warn/alert status. That sorta messes up the RRDs
for one cycle, but oh well.
On 3/4/2015 9:58 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
I reset these counters about a week ago. I think this is not normal?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 1:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you
troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more,
no less. None of the other counters should increment except very rarely.
If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into
cust...@packetflux.com mailto:cust...@packetflux.com
On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
geo...@cbcast.com mailto:geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with
13.2/13.2.1. http://13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I
don't know why. I have a couple APs on a SyncInjector and some
single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it was just the
SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started seeing
the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of
install at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled
too. Random LBT hits, the APs show inSync and outSync counts but
no lost/acquired timing messages in the event log, and the
SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going crazy losing
session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts and I
have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun.
Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have
no idea, so I hope Cambium can figure it out.
On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs;
one will go into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new
universal pipes pull power from two pins, so it can be
used with either PMP100/450 or 430 APs. But I always have
the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the center
RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the
LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this
SyncInjector running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up
the power/outputs such that (ether?) RJ45 on the
parasitic can be used to connect to the syncinjector?
One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a
vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So
I can just build this little jumper for between the
6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45
to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is
starting to act up. It seems to lose sync
about once every day or two for about 1
second. It's starting to raise havoc with
long-lasting client sessions through the
affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics
in stock; can one of these be swapped in
place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Looks like the GPS is losing lock.
The counters I'm talking about are on the analog tab
On Mar 4, 2015 8:58 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I reset these counters about a week ago. I think this is not normal?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 1:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you
troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more, no
less. None of the other counters should increment except very rarely.
If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into
cust...@packetflux.com
On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with 13.2/
13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I don't know why. I have a couple
APs on a SyncInjector and some single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it
was just the SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started
seeing the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of install
at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled too. Random LBT hits,
the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no lost/acquired timing messages
in the event log, and the SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going
crazy losing session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts
and I have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun.
Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have no idea,
so I hope Cambium can figure it out.
On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go
into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes
pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or 430
APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the
center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the LEDs, just
as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to the
syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a
vanilla
shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just build this little
jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45
to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second. It's
starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions through the
affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Hey Forrest, any luck on the updated build for the Base-1's, minus the
web GUI of course? I would really like to get the .0 row via SNMPwalk so
my indexed Cacti template works for both Base-1's and 2's.
On 3/4/2015 3:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you
troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more,
no less. None of the other counters should increment except very rarely.
If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into
cust...@packetflux.com mailto:cust...@packetflux.com
On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
geo...@cbcast.com mailto:geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with
13.2/13.2.1. http://13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I
don't know why. I have a couple APs on a SyncInjector and some
single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it was just the
SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started seeing
the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of
install at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled too.
Random LBT hits, the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no
lost/acquired timing messages in the event log, and the
SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going crazy losing
session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts and I
have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun.
Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have
no idea, so I hope Cambium can figure it out.
On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one
will go into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new
universal pipes pull power from two pins, so it can be
used with either PMP100/450 or 430 APs. But I always have
the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the center
RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the
LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this
SyncInjector running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up
the power/outputs such that (ether?) RJ45 on the
parasitic can be used to connect to the syncinjector?
One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a
vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I
can just build this little jumper for between the 6p6c
and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45 to
connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is
starting to act up. It seems to lose sync
about once every day or two for about 1
second. It's starting to raise havoc with
long-lasting client sessions through the
affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics
in stock; can one of these be swapped in place
of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
We're doing the same thing thresholding on the 1PPS Active counter. But
we (still) don't have any of our 3GHz PMP450s in the air yet. Was hoping
to have at least one of them up this week, but it's not worked out that way.
We are getting messages like these in the event log of the affected APs:
03/02/2015 : 20:06:20 PDT : Lost sync pulse from Power Port.
03/02/2015 : 20:06:20 PDT : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.
The loss doesn't last long, but I think it resets the session counters
on all the SMs.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 10:35 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Uh, no. Definitely not good.
Here's one of mine for comparison. Which is also where I'm having odd
issues with two 3GHz 450 sectors. Not to mention the same problems at
sites with parasitics. I have another SyncInjector at another site
running a 5GHz 450 AP and it works fine. Plus dozens and dozens of
deluxe and parasitics on FSK and 2.4 and 5GHz 450 which all work fine.
So it's not the timing devices. Something about the 3GHz 450 is just
different.
Anyway.. I cleared the events, I forget, maybe a month or two ago
after I cycled the pipe to see if that fixed anything, which it did
not. I use the event counters with Cacti thresholds to alert me when
something happens. I look to see what happened, then I clear the
counters to get the threshold out of warn/alert status. That sorta
messes up the RRDs for one cycle, but oh well.
On 3/4/2015 9:58 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
I reset these counters about a week ago. I think this is not normal?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 1:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you
troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no
more, no less. None of the other counters should increment except
very rarely.
If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into
cust...@packetflux.com mailto:cust...@packetflux.com
On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
geo...@cbcast.com mailto:geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with
13.2/13.2.1. http://13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I
don't know why. I have a couple APs on a SyncInjector and some
single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it was just the
SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started
seeing the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days
of install at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled
too. Random LBT hits, the APs show inSync and outSync counts but
no lost/acquired timing messages in the event log, and the
SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going crazy losing
session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts and
I have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in
FreeRun. Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed
up. I have no idea, so I hope Cambium can figure it out.
On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs;
one will go into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new
universal pipes pull power from two pins, so it can be
used with either PMP100/450 or 430 APs. But I always
have the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the
center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45
with the LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it
matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this
SyncInjector running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up
the power/outputs such that (ether?) RJ45 on the
parasitic can be used to connect to the
syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the
other is just a vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking
at a rev H1). So I can just build this little
jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45,
then use the outer RJ45 to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
There are some pulse counts on the syncinjectors which may help you
troubleshoot. Pulses used should go up by one every second, no more, no
less. None of the other counters should increment except very rarely.
If you're seeing anything else, shoot a couple of screenshots into
cust...@packetflux.com
On Mar 2, 2015 1:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with 13.2/
13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I don't know why. I have a couple
APs on a SyncInjector and some single APs on parasitic pipes. I thought it
was just the SyncInjector or something else at the site until I started
seeing the same problems on the parasitics after just a few days of install
at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled too. Random LBT hits,
the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no lost/acquired timing messages
in the event log, and the SyncInjector says nothing happened, SMs going
crazy losing session, APs reporting SMs out of range when things go nuts
and I have to reboot the AP(s). AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun.
Something in the FPGA code or some other logic screwed up. I have no idea,
so I hope Cambium can figure it out.
On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go
into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes
pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or 430
APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio into the
center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the LEDs, just
as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to the
syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a vanilla
shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just build this little
jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45
to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes. http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-
syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second. It's
starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions through the
affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Yes, there are issues I'm seeing with AutoSync on all bands with
13.2/13.2.1. But 3GHz is... different, and I don't know why. I have a
couple APs on a SyncInjector and some single APs on parasitic pipes. I
thought it was just the SyncInjector or something else at the site until
I started seeing the same problems on the parasitics after just a few
days of install at new sites. They all have the on-board GPS disabled
too. Random LBT hits, the APs show inSync and outSync counts but no
lost/acquired timing messages in the event log, and the SyncInjector
says nothing happened, SMs going crazy losing session, APs reporting SMs
out of range when things go nuts and I have to reboot the AP(s).
AutoSync+FreeRun get stuck in FreeRun. Something in the FPGA code or
some other logic screwed up. I have no idea, so I hope Cambium can
figure it out.
On 3/2/2015 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go
into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal
pipes pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either
PMP100/450 or 430 APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out
to the radio into the center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to
the RJ45 with the LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the
power/outputs such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used
to connect to the syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and
the other is just a vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev
H1). So I can just build this little jumper for between the 6p6c
and the adjacent RJ45, then use the outer RJ45 to connect to the
syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second.
It's starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions
through the affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Yes. http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote: We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second. It's starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions through the affected APs. We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to the
syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a
vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just build
this little jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then use
the outer RJ45 to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second.
It's starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions
through the affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes
pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or
430 APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio into
the center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with the
LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to the
syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just a
vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just build
this little jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45, then
use the outer RJ45 to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second.
It's starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions
through the affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux basic versus parasitic?
Not this one. This one is running a pair of PMP450s in 5 GHz.
We're putting up a pair of PMP450s soon on different POPs; one will go
into a syncinjector, the other will be a CTM.
Is there some issue that you're seeing on the 3GHz varaiety?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 10:06 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RJ45's are just pass-thru. The new universal pipes
pull power from two pins, so it can be used with either PMP100/450 or
430 APs. But I always have the guys put the jumper out to the radio
into the center RJ45 and the cable from the injector to the RJ45 with
the LEDs, just as standard practice, not that it matters.
I do have a question for you about this though.. is this SyncInjector
running 3GHz 450 APs?
On 3/2/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Thanks George!
i take it from the description that this boogers up the power/outputs
such that (ether?) RJ45 on the parasitic can be used to connect to
the syncinjector? One of the RJ45s has lights, and the other is just
a vanilla shielded RJ45 (I'm looking at a rev H1). So I can just
build this little jumper for between the 6p6c and the adjacent RJ45,
then use the outer RJ45 to connect to the syncinjector?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/2/2015 9:44 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote:
Yes.
http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector
On 3/2/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We have a syncpipe basic that we think is starting to act up. It
seems to lose sync about once every day or two for about 1 second.
It's starting to raise havoc with long-lasting client sessions
through the affected APs.
We only have a couple of syncpipe parasitics in stock; can one of
these be swapped in place of a basic to run a sync injector?
