On 2/8/2020 2:07 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 16:21, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
>>
>> The below CFJ is 3793. I assign it to Alexis.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3793
>>
>> ===
On 2/24/2020 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> This time to the official forum:
It doesn't matter in this case I think, but be careful of forwarding
something from BUS to OFF - the way I'd interpret precedents it would
count as (attempting) to do it twice (which should simply
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> Rule 478/37 states that 'To "publish" or "announce" something is to send
> a public message whose body contains that thing'. Because of this
> definition, it is generally IMPOSSIBLE to act on behalf of another
> person to "publish" information,
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 1:33 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >
> > I was reading the ruleset and found that Master is a masculine noun.
> > Mistress is the feminine version. A quick google search of the definition
> > of master brought up this too:
> >
> > noun
> > 1. a man who has people working for
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:01 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 14:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> > > Rule 478/37 states that 'To "publish" or "announce" something is to send
> > > a public message whose body contains that thing'.
On 2/28/2020 5:38 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> 8348* Gaelan 3.1 Summaries Matter
>
> FOR, I guess, although I'm slightly concerned about it making it easier
> for ratification to fail.
I'm still grappling with this one a bit - Gaelan can you give me an
On 3/1/2020 7:54 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> I thought about that possibility, because R2160 includes this
>> provision, which seems to prevent any deputisation where other rules
>> of any power prohibit the same action from the
On 3/1/2020 11:16 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 3/1/2020 7:54 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> I thought about that possibility, because R2160 includes this
>>> provision, which seems to prevent any deputisation where other rules
On 1/19/2020 7:09 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> The vast majority of thesis publications I’ve seen are either legal or
> historical. If anything, this is exactly the sort of thing that shouldn’t
> qualify for a J.N. IMO, it’s about public policy, not rule interpretation.
To me
On 3/2/2020 3:45 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:39 PM Tanner Swett wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 04:41 Cuddle Beam wrote:
>>
>>> I think this would cause:
>>> - A big and spreading fog of war of CfJ DISMISS, because its
>> "undecidable"
>>> and "insufficient information
On Monday, March 2, 2020, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > Well, we purposefully error-trapped switches, which suggests that we
> allow
> > that sort of thing if the rules are explicit about it happening:
> >
> > > If a type of
On 3/2/2020 8:11 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Monday, March 2, 2020, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 08:23 Cuddle Beam wrote:
>>
>>> But yeah, even if it is tradition, I'm not against just going contrary to
>>> it since all we need to do that
On 3/2/2020 4:44 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 3/2/20 7:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> The below CFJ is 3818. I assign it to Jason.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3818
>>
>> === CFJ 3818 ===
>>
>> Rance's
On 3/2/2020 3:50 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> CuddleBeam wrote:
>> So, twg was cool to not weasel out when they had the chance to, so I will
>> as well. I don’t know how to best do this aside from a Pledge, and I dont
>> want to make the N too high in case he wants to use
On 3/2/2020 2:40 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> Not yet. Think I have till tomorrow?
>
I'm showing it as assigned Feb 19th, due Feb 26th:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2020-February/013456.html
(but I'm not going to recuse you for
On 3/2/2020 2:25 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 11:34 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> Well, we purposefully error-trapped switches, which suggests that we allow
>> that sort of thing if the rules are explicit about it happening:
>>
>
> But an indeterminate value is merely one that
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:34 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:01 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 14:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> > > > > Rule 478/37 states that 'To "publish" or
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 20:50 Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
>> I become a party to the Dragon Corporation.
On 3/2/2020 7:11 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-business wrote:
> As per the contract known as "Gaelan's Really Bad At Sending Things To
> The Public Forum", I act on Gaelan's behalf to perform the
n styles, is quite
> interesting in an Agoran context.
>
>> On Mar 2, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/2020 12:01 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> alright WHO brought back regulations godd
On 2/20/2020 3:08 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> CFJ 3813 asks us whether Agora is a contract...
Gaelan did you ever deliver this judgement I can't find anything on BUS or
OFF that has it just not sure if I'm missing it. -G.
On 3/2/2020 12:01 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> alright WHO brought back regulations goddamnit
who brought back top-posting is what I want to know
On 2/26/2020 7:16 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> On Feb 26, 2020, at 6:13 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> AGAINST. These should not become part of precedent but should change/be
>> removed with a change in officer, OR make it clear that an
On 2/26/2020 6:41 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/26/20 9:12 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> 8345j Jason2.0 Self-punishment
>> FOR. wcgw
>>
>
> Is this a typo or just an acronym I don't know?
>
what could go wrong
On 1/23/2020 4:19 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> 8298 Aris, [2]2.0 Administrative Adjudication v3
>> AGAINST. Two concerns here. (1) I have no idea what "tracked along
>> with judicial cases" means in terms of practical tracking, and don't
>> think it
On 1/25/2020 7:31 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Thank you! Thank you! You have no idea how much easier this makes to fit in
> the authors on a proposal distribution.
>
> (Please, no one respond by being contrary and expanding their Agoran name.)
>
> -Aris
*coughs in Publius
On 1/25/2020 1:46 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 16:42, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 19:11, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
>> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>>> When we last ha
On 1/25/2020 12:23 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> if anyone has any other arguments or opinions between A.N. and B.N., I
> would appreciate hearing them. If I do not, I will likely make intents for
> both B.N. and A.N. and resolve the stronger one.
I've seen too few comparisons
On 1/25/2020 11:50 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 14:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> The below CFJ is 3794. I assign it to Alexis.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3794
>
>
On 1/26/2020 12:50 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> Matthew Berlin wrote:
>> If you publish a hash of the shoe beforehand, and the entire shoe
>> afterwards for verification of the hash, you might get more takers,
>
> I know next to nothing about blackjack, but that sounds like
On 1/22/2020 8:13 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 02:11, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Why are we reading the date-stamping to refer to the date-stamp of the
>> original message? I would think it obvious that the relevant message is the
>>
On 1/22/2020 8:13 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 02:11, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Why are we reading the date-stamping to refer to the date-stamp of the
>> original message? I would think it obvious that the relevant message is the
>>
On 1/26/2020 7:38 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> Alexis wrote:
>> I'm not sold on this, or on the precedent.
>>
>> R2125 is clear that actions can only be performed by the methods
>> *explicitly* specified. It seems to me that it closes the door to methods
>> of performing
On 1/26/2020 8:59 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 11:40, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 1/26/2020 7:38 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
On 1/23/2020 4:40 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> I intend, with 2 days' notice, to temporarily deputise for the ADoP to
> end the uncontested election for Treasuror, thereby installing myself.
No deputisation needed if there's only 1 candidate, R2154:
> If at any point
On 1/29/2020 2:21 AM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:36 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> I found a random old mbox in a personal archive a while back, that had
>> Agoran emails from Jun - Aug 2001 (probably from a tempora
On 1/29/2020 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2020 9:25 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>> (then again, there's also this:)
>>
>>> Judgments in Nomic are not bound by rules of precedent, for that would
>>> require a daunting amount of record-keeping for each game.
>
>
On 1/29/2020 9:25 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> (then again, there's also this:)
>
>> Judgments in Nomic are not bound by rules of precedent, for that would
>> require a daunting amount of record-keeping for each game.
Well, e's not wrong...
On 1/29/2020 11:17 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> Having achieved a full set of 16 Ribbons, including the new Emerald
> Ribbon, I Raise a Banner, causing me to win the game.
Congratulations!!
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:22 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:32 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Warrigal's proposal of pragmatic validation is an interesting one, and one
> > that I haven't really seen Agora use before if memory serves. The one I'm
> >
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:32 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Warrigal's proposal of pragmatic validation is an interesting one, and one
> that I haven't really seen Agora use before if memory serves. The one I'm
> familiar with is having actions be POSSIBLE but ILLEGAL where they
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The officer was under a
> SHALL to check all transactions, but any that got missed (after a
> certain time limit) succeeded "for free".
The Rule for this was reasonably self-contained and seems similar to
what you're talking about, so figured
awww - i'd seen that and my birthday is Feb 4th
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:36 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal. *winces*
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Finite Gifting
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors:
>
> Amend Rule 2585, Birthday
On 1/29/2020 5:14 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
>> awww - i'd seen that and my birthday is Feb 4th
>
> Same, though it sounds like it wouldn't have gone unnoticed until May
> anyway...
>
> You can still use it, though! No chance of the proposal passing
On 1/29/2020 6:11 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 14:17, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
>> Having achieved a full set of 16 Ribbons, including the new Emerald
>> Ribbon, I Raise a Banner, causing me to win the game.
>>
>> -twg
>>
>
> Given that:
> a) I'm genuinely uncertain about
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:55 AM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:09, James Cook wrote:
> > Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated
> > players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a
> > little.
>
> By the way, I
On 1/30/2020 5:36 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> I had an idea for making degrees more interesting. I was thinking that
> the Herald might, for instance, record twg's degree not as "A.N." (if
> it ends up being an A.N.) but as "A.N. in Devious Oratory". We could
> go back and
On 1/30/2020 8:31 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/30/20 11:20 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> So, this is from the era of the mysql database. The mysql database actually
>> had fields like "Caller" and "Judge" as look
On 1/30/2020 7:27 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> During research for CFJ 3888, I discovered that there appears to have
> been a bug ... somewhere in the history.
>
> From the (arbitrarily selected) text of CFJ 2991 in the Github backup [0]:
>
>>
Drat kinda boring:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3805
On 1/30/2020 9:37 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> TTttPF
>
>> On Jan 30, 2020, at 9:36 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2020, at 8:20 PM, Kerim
n’t run into
> word-wrap issues)
>
>> On Jan 31, 2020, at 2:24 AM, omd via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:32 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> Drat kinda boring:
>>> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3805
>>
>> The word wrapping broke the script.
>
, `DON'T ASK ME`,
> > `THE ONLY REAL ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF THIS IS WISHFUL THINKING`,
> > `A TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF "I SAY I DO, THEREFORE I DO", WHICH`+
> > ` HAS PLAGUED AGORA FOR A LONG TIME`,`IF YOU SAY SO`];document.
> > querySelectorAll('.hist b').forEach(x=>x.innerH
ument.
> querySelectorAll('.hist b').forEach(x=>x.innerHTML=a[Math.floor(
> Math.random()*a.length) ]) doesn’t adversely affect
> eir archive.
> }
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On Jan 31, 2020, at 7:42 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> Paste
For the record, I just sent the case assignment message, it tripped my
spam filter on the return so dunno if enough people will see the
assignment to make it public :)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:46 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
wrote:
>
> Notice of Honour:
> +1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:09 AM omd wrote:
> This leaves the text as "inconsistent", and Rule 217 informs us to
> augment it by the usual factors. In this case, "game custom" clearly
> supports higher-power rules taking precedence over lower-power ones.
> So does "common sense": the ruleset as a
On 1/30/2020 9:03 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 16:55, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 10:32, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> Proto: "Pragmatic decisions",
On 1/30/2020 9:16 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Anyway, I like G.'s proposal, but why even require a reasonably
>> accurate tally for it to be self-ratifying? Just require
>> decision+outcome, and make the rest SHALL.
>
> I went back and forth on that as a possibility - I don't have a strong reason
On 1/30/2020 9:23 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 9:20 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I went back and forth on that as a possibility - I don't have a strong reason
>> so maybe a SHALL is best - the only issue being what Alexis pointed out, that
>> if we want (as
On 1/30/2020 9:06 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 17:03, James Cook wrote:
>> Here's a somewhat different way we could do it:
>>
>> * An announcement resolving a decision doesn't need to specify
>> anything other than the decision --- not even the outcome.
Falsifian wrote:
>> hope that the economy gets reset or something
Also sorry: I was planning to try something hyper-inflationary on my
Agoran Birthday earlier this week, to try to force the need for a
reset (e.g. pledging to give back 2/3 of coins of anyone who gave me
them) but it's been a heck
The Archives are now CFJ 3805 compliant.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:20 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:07 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > The Archives are now CFJ 3805 compliant.
>
> After clicking on CFJ 3805 in the archives, I have to disag
On 2/7/2020 4:31 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 23:31, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>>
>> I don't consider that an "adverse effect" as it preserves both the
>> text and spirit of the case. ;) I hope its preservation in
On 1/23/2020 7:49 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> Proposal: A Degree of Inefficiency (AI=3)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2595 (Performing a Dependent Action) by inserting ", and did not
> subsequently withdraw, " immediately after "published" in the first
> paragraph.
> }}}
>
> -Alexis
>
On 1/23/2020 8:28 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 11:20, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 1/23/2020 7:49 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
>>> Proposal: A Degree of Inefficienc
On 1/23/2020 8:28 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> More debatable whether:
>
> 1. intent
> 2. intent again
> 3. withdraw one intent but not the other
>
> works, but since it refers to "an announcement of intent", the intended
> interpretation is that it applies to the specific announcement, reinforced
Recently it's come up about which cases are missing from the CFJ
archives. Since missing numbers are hidden on the main CFJ index
page, I thought I'd share this:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/archive_status2020.htm
This is a static snapshot of the tool I use to look for gaps (the
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:34 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via
agora-discussion wrote:
> It all depends on whether "If POSSIBLE" means "If currently POSSIBLE"
> or "If POSSIBLE when the requirement was created". I don't see that it's
> 100% unambiguous, but your reading definitely wins on "common sense"
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:52 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via
agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > I'm *slightly* concerned on this because I think that deputizing for
> > someone who isn't yet late is slightly rude, as the officer should be
> > given discretion on when to do stuff without being
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:28 AM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 11:20, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/23/2020 7:49 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
>> > Proposal: A Degree of Inefficiency (AI=3)
>> > {{{
>>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:35 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Adding a withdrawal clause prevents the
> initiator from changing eir mind later, which is IMO generally a good thing
> as it means that people can take withdrawal at face value and not have to
> remember to object anyway.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:09 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> I think my (misleading named) “too intense” scam from February of this year
> might be relevant.
>
> The gist of that was that the rules at the time required that declarations of
> intent be conspicuous and,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:24 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-official
wrote:
> NOW KNOW YOU that we, by the Powers granted to us under Winning the
> Game, being the two thousand and forty-fourth Rule of Agora, do hereby
> bestow upon G. the Patent Title of Champion; and
Thanks! I'm curious what you
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> omd wrote:
> > However, I vaguely remember having proposed this in the past, and
> > someone objecting to it. But I can't find the thread; searching for
> > "scrapers", only this thread comes up. I could be misremembering.
>
> Is this
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:50 PM James Cook wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 15:46, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Also relevant: CFJs 3411-3412.
>
> I was hesitent to raise this morbid concern, but now that the subject
> has been broached, are dead former players persons?
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:26 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 12:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:24 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-official
> > wrote:
> > > NOW KNOW YOU that w
On 1/28/2020 8:16 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/28/20 11:12 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> I earn 5 coins for assessing a proposal.
>> You can't, because P8295 made it so the ADoP has to do
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:35 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> This is a RECOMMENDED method for resetting aspects of the game in a
> fair and equitable manner following the discovery and/or exploitation
> of unintended loopholes within the Rules
Following twg's thesis, I'm far
On 1/30/2020 7:47 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 15:43, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 1/30/20 10:21 AM, James Cook wrote:
>>> Shouldn't you also say that you resolve these decisions? My
>>> understanding is that you're not publishing a
On 1/30/2020 7:21 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 14:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Draft revision, since this is complicated:
>>
>> All of these CoEs are accepted.
>>
>> Revised resolutions for 8292-8307:
>
> Shouldn't you also say that you
On 1/30/2020 3:44 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu., Jan. 30, 2020, 06:08 AIS523 wrote:
>> I should note, though, that "in a timely fashion" is a relatively new
>> phrasing. For a long time, the standard phrasing was "as soon as
>> possible" (which was nonetheless defined to mean "within seven
On 2/18/2020 11:43 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie
On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
> player is to set that zombie's master switch to that player, and
> Agora CAN transfer zombies by willing it to be done.
Did I miss a new definition of
On 2/18/2020 11:56 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/18/20 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
>>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:53 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
> I’m happy to be an interested judge and take a heavier-than-usual load
Thanks! And thanks to everyone who's volunteered so far, I'll get
assignments out over the next day.
> do I have to do anything specific to get out
On 2/20/2020 4:42 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:28 PM sukil wrote:
>
>>
>> El 19/02/2020 a las 22:40, Cuddle Beam via agora-business escribió:
>>> I don't find this overly obscure, because it's fairly easily readable.
>>>
>>> This is normal English, but in a cool font. It
On 2/20/2020 8:27 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
>> keep the nonstandard characters limited
>
> "Nonstandard"? Unicode has been around since before I was born - seems
> to me your software has had plenty of time to update...
:) :) To be clear I wasn't talking
On 2/19/2020 9:33 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/19/20 10:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> The below CFJ is 3810. I assign it to Jason.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3810
>>
>> === CFJ 3810
On 2/20/2020 3:08 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> CFJ 3813 asks us whether Agora is a contract. As noted by the caller, CFJ
> 3706 (Feb 9-14, 2019) asked a similar question. It was judged TRUE by G.
>
> As I see it, the questions before me are:
> 1) Was CFJ 3706 judged
On 2/20/2020 11:35 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> I’ma go ahead and CFJ this: { Gaelan submitted a bid in the February
> zombie auction, or would have done so if the auction existed. }
>
> Falsifan’s arguments (for the arbitor's convenience): {
> Note that I am assuming here that
On 2/20/2020 5:49 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/20/20 7:08 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> So when R1742 was re-implemented (replacing R2520-2527), we still ended up
>> with "Agora = agreement" and "contract = agreement"
On 2/20/2020 7:20 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/20/20 9:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Also fun: the first clause of the 2018 proposal (8054) was: "Destroy all
>> contracts".
>>
>> -G.
>
> Ouch. S
On 2/8/2020 4:16 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/8/20 7:11 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> [5] https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3773 found that
>> future-dated reports are inaccurate by nature (too inaccurate to be
>> considered
>> a report).
>
>
On 2/9/2020 7:18 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Falsifian wrote:
>
>> 1b. Agora's nature as a broadcast email list seems to put limits on
>> how many active players it can practically sustain. If 100
>> players were all sending interesting proposals and
On 2/9/2020 2:22 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 17:19, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
> wrote:
>> On Bernie's behalf, Notice of Honour:
>> -1 Gaelan (applying the CSS for eir ruleset primarily via arbitrary
>>emoji. I don't know why you
On 2/9/2020 3:01 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I strongly oppose this. In my view, inquiry cases should generally
> *not* be the officer making the initial interpretation, at least not
> preferentially. Inquiry cases are effectively the fallback appeal
> mechanism, and should
On 2/9/2020 3:21 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> PROPOSAL 8317 (Zombie trade)
> FOR (5): Alexis%, Bernie, Gaelan, omd, twg&
> AGAINST (6): Aris, Falsifian$, G., Jason, Rance, o
> PRESENT (0):
> BALLOTS: 11
> AI (F/A): 21/19 (AI=1.0)
> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
This one is very broken if
On 2/9/2020 12:48 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> n Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 15:36, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/2020 12:25 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 15:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
>>&g
On 2/9/2020 2:17 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
>> On 2/8/2020 5:38 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>>>
>>> * I act on behalf of Bernie to award myself a White Ribbon.
>>>
>>
>> This is one of the few things that can permanently and adversely affect a
>> player's
On 2/9/2020 2:59 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> Amend rule 991 by appending “All other things being equal, the Arbitor SHOULD
> assign Calls for Judgement to the officer most concerned with its content.”
> after the sentence "The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such
On 2/9/2020 4:51 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 19:41, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> I've been thinking for a while that zombies should be transferable
>> assets. It's really simple to implement too: You just need to create a
>> "control
1 - 100 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo
