Hi,
I converted the equivalent to this query to JOOQ:
select a.mediaId
from contentApplication a
join mediaRelationship r on r.childId = a.mediaId
join module md on md.mediaId = r.parentId
where md.mediaId = 'xyz'
and exists (
select 1
from sync_content as sc
join
Second that. It's kind of funny to stay in beta for a couple of years, but
come on, there are lots of serious spiky haired people out there who panic
when they hear 'beta' ;-)
Eelco
On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-5, Tim Boudreau wrote:
Hi, folks,
I've been using Guice 4 since,
( MyDSL.field(BAR.FOO, value1, something-else, value3)
);
2015-02-14 15:50 GMT+01:00 Eelco Hillenius eelco.h...@gmail.com
javascript::
Hi,
I'm trying to get this :
select foo from bar order by field(foo, 'value1', 'something-else',
'value3')
into a select query, but can't figure out
Hi,
I'm trying to get this :
select foo from bar order by field(foo, 'value1', 'something-else',
'value3')
into a select query, but can't figure out how to translate the 'field'
function in the context of order by. Any idea how to do this?
Eelco
btw, I also posted this question to
Hi,
I love that jOOQ has integrated transaction handling now. One of the rough
spots I found however is that when an exception happens during a
transaction and the rollback that jOOQ then tries to perform fails, it'll
'eat' the exception that caused it. I'm not sure why the rollback fails in
Hi,
I'm writing unit tests for some Storm code and have been trying to
find a way to wait for LocalCluster to be initialized. Is there a
straightforward way to do that? Instead of letting the current thread
sleep for a little, which is what I see a lot in examples, I'd like to
block (e.g. using a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eelco Hillenius resolved WICKET-271.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Doesn't seem like this will ever happen unless it's a big huge itch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13202174#comment-13202174
]
Eelco Hillenius commented on WICKET-271:
Might as well close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eelco Hillenius closed WICKET-271.
--
investigate Ajax back button support
Well this is indeed a blast from the past!
You seem to be missing jdom.jar from your classpath as well. There
will be a version in your maverick distribution, or you can find the
latest version here: http://www.jdom.org/
Also, sometimes you can have class path issues if you have duplicate
@Alex Objelean Igor Vanyberg-2
Yea, my bad on just posting something up here without looking at any
previous posts. Look, it was my rant and how I felt about things at the
time. Nothing personal. This was actually the clean version for public
consumption. It was probably still too rude
Really, is this what you do, go around posting to user lists of
frameworks you don't like? I imagine one can have a full time job
doing that.
Eelco
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Eric Kizaki erickiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Violates Dry: You must repeat the component hierarchy of your widgets
To be honest, I don't think the comparison matrix is that bad. I would
consider a framework like Vaadin over Wicket if all I wanted a typical
desktop style only (menu bar, content frames + layout manager, fancy
widgets) only type of application, what they call application
oriented, especially
Ugh, I mean 'just do that in JavaScript'
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest, I don't think the comparison matrix is that bad. I would
consider a framework like Vaadin over Wicket if all I wanted a typical
desktop style only (menu bar
Eelco Hillenius:
Hi,
Hello Eelco,
Right. I implemented this as an unmanaged extension. Now what I'm
wondering is if I can implement the same as a server plugin.
You can - but if you already have code that works, I wouldn't bother.
I like that server plugins are drop-ins that don't
Hi,
The unmanaged extensions simply give you access to the underlying Graph
Database instance (through the annotations).
The managed plugins do far more than this - they also provide a way of
generating JSON/HTML responses automatically (using HTTP content negotiation).
In either case
Hi Michael,
there is at least one issue that I can see - different type + dir might have
the same hashcode overriding each other.
Hmmm, I must be missing something? Both type and direction are enums
and will have unique hashes?
I would use Rel as a real class.
Maybe I'm overreacting, but
Hi,
Hello Eelco,
Right. I implemented this as an unmanaged extension. Now what I'm
wondering is if I can implement the same as a server plugin.
You can - but if you already have code that works, I wouldn't bother.
I like that server plugins are drop-ins that don't require further
Take a look at ServerModule and NeoServerBootstrapper for how it works. It's
not terribly tricky for us to open that up to 3rd parties, but I get a little
worried about conflicting server modules causing strange behaviour.
Yeah, probably rightfully so.
If you really think you want us to do
Hi,
I'd like to implement a server function that returns for a given node
(id) how many occurrences exist for a relationship. That's easy enough
to implement (I think) using an unmanaged extension, but not something
that can readily be implemented as a server plugin, as it would
require returning
I'm doing that, and it works fine.
Eelco
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Vaccaro, Kristen M kvacc...@mitre.org wrote:
Hi, I have a question about sessions in Neo4j. I'm working with the embedded
Java (not as a server) and I can load my data and query it between
transactions without
while REST is not a very performant way to access any low level API
directly, there is a Java Wrapper for the Neo4j API over REST from Michael
Hunger https://github.com/jexp/neo4j-java-rest-binding that does the Neo4j
API over REST.
Gave this a try. Works great! Thanks for that contribution.
However, it seems the the ServiceLoader approach is not really compatible
with OSGi, see
http://jbossosgi.blogspot.com/2010/01/suns-serviceloader-and-how-it-relates.htmlfor
details. Eelco, did you solve this problem in some nice way so I can
adjust the tests?
I'm afraid not. I dropped in the
I have a similar problem right now, and it seems to be related to the
fact that I'm running an older Lucene version :
Tue Jun 07 10:43:10 PDT 2011: Failed to load index provider lucene
org/apache/lucene/util/Version
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/lucene/util/Version
at
FWIW, my project is using Lucene 2.3.2
Eelco
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a similar problem right now, and it seems to be related to the
fact that I'm running an older Lucene version :
Tue Jun 07 10:43:10 PDT 2011: Failed to load
neubauer.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,
This looks like a version problem. Neo4j latest uses Lucene the 3.1
Sent from my phone.
On Jun 7, 2011 7:47 PM, Eelco Hillenius eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, my project is using Lucene 2.3.2
Eelco
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Eelco Hillenius
So what version of Lucene are you on? After I upped my version of
Lucene (to 3.2.0) my problem went away. If you're using Maven, you
might also want to check for duplicates (mvn dependency:tree out.txt
and look for multiple entries of Lucene).
Eelco
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Super Wang
Hi,
I like the idea of Blueprints. But I would like to have Neo4J running
in server mode, and hence would be interested in a Blueprints
implementation that wraps the REST API rather than the internal one.
Has anyone been thinking about implementing that?
Any reason why one shouldn't want to use
Hi,
I like the idea of Blueprints. But I would like to have Neo4J running
in server mode, and hence would be interested in a Blueprints
implementation that wraps the REST API rather than the internal one.
Has anyone been thinking about implementing that?
Thats ultimately what Rexster is.
Hi Peter,
Eelco,
while REST is not a very performant way to access any low level API
directly, there is a Java Wrapper for the Neo4j API over REST from Michael
Hunger https://github.com/jexp/neo4j-java-rest-binding that does the Neo4j
API over REST.
Excellent, thanks for the pointer.
This
Excellent! I live in Seattle and often am in San Francisco for work,
so +1 for either/ both.
Eelco
On Saturday, June 4, 2011, Andreas Kollegger
andreas.kolleg...@neotechnology.com wrote:
That sounds great; I'd love to get something organized in the Seattle area. I
can create the meetup then
Imho the overall user experience in Chrome is better, including the
developer tools. Even if it might miss a feature of two :-)
Eelco
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Well, I don't share your opinion here :-)
Chrome Dev tools have no persist
Great job, thanks for maintaining it!
Eelco
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Minas Manthos minas.mant...@gmail.com wrote:
Recent change notes:
0.9.2
-Fixed: gutter jitter [Defect 77]
-Fixed: Repeated F4 from class needs me to move cursor [Defect 62]
-Fixed: WicketForge does not recognize
Another baby, congrats!
Eelco
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
For the past nine months I have been quietly working on a book about
Wicket. Unlike other books on the market this one does not attempt to
teach you Wicket from the ground up. Instead,
Another baby, congrats!
Eelco
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
For the past nine months I have been quietly working on a book about
Wicket. Unlike other books on the market this one does not attempt to
teach you Wicket from the ground up. Instead,
I have a c++ background and this kind of problem is even more dangerous in
c++ (virtual calls don't work as normal in constructors). In Java also, I
think making this known to the outside world before it is fully
constructed is unsafe, as illustrated above.
It's a potential problem we've been
Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less
is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of
my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs,
CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no
My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as possible.
Noticing this some guys have told me that maybe wicket is not for this.
Considering that atleast 20% of the requests will be session based, do you
suggest using wicket.
You should also consider why you want to use
I don't know whether it is used structurally atm, but I have used
Findbugs at least once or twice a few years ago with Wicket.
Eelco
2011/1/24 César Couto cesar...@dcc.ufmg.br:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the
Doesn't solve anything in particular, right? Personally, I think the
current names are fine.
Eelco
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:02 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
ApplicationLifecycleListener?
On
We've always opted for specific, descriptive names, even when grossly
verbose :) I, too, think we should rename it. I like the approach of
moving it to an interface that extends IInitializer, deprecate and remove in
1.6. Although, I feel like a 1.5 name change would be absolutely fine -
: Bug
Components: wicket-examples
Affects Versions: 1.5-RC1
Reporter: Eelco Hillenius
localization in the forminput example does not appear to be working. See:
http://screencast.com/t/xxZFfUzi
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply
As far as I am concerned, that depends on this issue I just found:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3363. If that's just a
problem with the example (probably the case, as the other localization
examples work fine), I am +1 for releasing. If internationalization is
broken, then I am -1.
duh :-)
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
ault is the cut off DefaultMarkupSourcingStrategy
-igor
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I am concerned, that depends on this issue I just found
We shouldn't just remove things that were part of the public API
without either providing an alternative or at least a good reason why
it should be removed (and have that documented clearly as part of the
migration documentation).
Eelco
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Martin Grigorov
Used to be used to determine whether the underlying session should be
updated, which is/ was relevant for session replication.
Eelco
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
In 1.5 trunk WebSession has a transient variable dirty which is set to
- using individual database users to represent real users - giving end-to-end
authentication allowing the use of features such as SQL Trace fine
grained auditing
Does that mean that the number of open connections always equals the
number of signed in users?
- using database roles to
This also applies to models, which you should use if you can over
doing this directly in components. Also, besides serialization, the
default configuration in Wicket keeps the current page in memory
between requests. If you properly 'detach' (deflate might have been a
good alternative word), you
More shocking to me is that so little bit know about Guice (well, this
actually is also my experience interviewing potential job candidates).
People are really missing something good.
Eelco
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:33 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
We were listed behind
. or,
override
onconfigure() and set visibility there in a more
deterministic
fashion.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
To expand, unless I'm missing something (new?), things
huh? that doesnt make any sense. the callbacks like onconfigure simply
give you checkpoints for calculating and caching visibility rather
then calculating every time.
I wasn't arguing against onConfigure (which is a fine trade-off) but
saw an example of where relying on just setVisible would
Yep, or least something comparable. You need to re-attach those
objects you're using to the session somehow, and often the easiest way
to do that is to just load them again if they were previously
detached. If you worry about the database being hit more than you
want, you are probably prematurely
+1 Accept Wave for incubation
(non-binding)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious. Which ideas would you steal from SiteBricks and JaxRS?
There are also many interesting ideas in Apache Sling
Niether is evil. It has potential pitfalls, which you should just be
aware of. We use such overrides all over the place and never have
problems with them either. :-) Avoiding it is safer, but also more
verbose (in 1.3.x at least).
Eelco
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Igor Vaynberg
with when trying to figure out how it got to be
in that state. So, sorry Igor, but we disagree on this one.
Eelco
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
Niether is evil. It has potential pitfalls, which you should just be
aware of. We use
Well, in the past, the canned answer was override
isEnabled/isVisible. Changing that paradigm and doing a complete 180
is troubling.
I don't think that's the case though. We've had many discussions on
this list (and in private even), and we've always felt uneasy about
supporting two rather
it has nothing to do with requiring a function to be set. the problem
is that the function is free to change its mind at any moment, but we
rely on it returning the same value during some fixed periods of time.
if we truly want to support isvisible() we would need to cache/memoize
the value
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:45 PM, richard emberson
richard.ember...@gmail.com wrote:
If wicket was going to be coded over again, would you make
isEnabled and/or isVisible final methods?
If *I* would do it, I'd probably write it for Scala and lean more
heavily on functions rather than mutable
But all really depends on your approach. Some people think dabbling in
a swamp gives you a firm grip. I cosinder it the opposite: swamp has a
firm grip on you.
I consider it asking for trouble. Wicket would sacrifice
predictability and conceptual surface for the sake of making a few
things
Web pages are 80% trivial. Small friction like doing unnecessary
hierarcy matching is waste of time. 5 min per hour, 40 minutes per
day, 800 minutes per month, 20 people team 16000 wasted minutes per
month is 33 days per month wasted only because of wicket hierarchies.
As time and time again
I don't think it is. Keeping the two hierarchies in sync is not really that
difficult. The funny thing about the proposed approach is that it is in an
effort to make things simpler. But, as you pointed out, the more complex
things won't work with the proposed approach (without probably some
I think it is a bad idea to enable something that makes developing a
little bit quicker/ easier but that makes problems potentially much
harder to debug.
I don't see any difference in getting hierarchy not matched
exception from either way. Ofcourse the main difference is that you
would get
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, cretzel mailinglists...@gmail.com wrote:
We're building a multi-tenant capable application. The basic idea is to
identify the tenant for a request and put the tenant information into a
Your browser doesn't identify a new tab as a new session. Therefore
the servlet container doesn't know that it is a new user. If it is a
valid usecase, you should build multi user session sharing in your
app. If it is a bug, you should properly log out the first user when
the new user is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eelco Hillenius updated WICKET-1130:
Attachment: (was: GuiceLazyInitProxyFactory.java)
Injection of Bound Instance Fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12896730#action_12896730
]
Eelco Hillenius commented on WICKET-1130:
-
@Casper there isn't really a meaningful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12894916#action_12894916
]
Eelco Hillenius commented on WICKET-1143:
-
Don't know if it is that important
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eelco Hillenius updated WICKET-1130:
Attachment: GuiceLazyInitProxyFactory.java
Amazing that this issue has been unresolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eelco Hillenius reassigned WICKET-1130:
---
Assignee: (was: Alastair Maw)
Injection of Bound Instance Fails with Exception
Welcome Martin, and thanks a bunch for keeping the project alive and kicking!
Eelco
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:51 PM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Grats Martin :)
2010/7/19 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
The Wicket team is happy to announce that Martin
Hi folks!
At Teachscape, we're looking for a good Java Software Engineer,
preferably with Wicket experience, in San Francisco. See:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/sof/1794123343.html
Please shoot me an email if you're interested in this position.
Cheers,
Eelco
I had a terrible day because one of my bosses complain about how I have
done
one task of a project, we had to implement something that updates a field
in the database, my brilliant idea was to create a thread inside the wicket
init method that makes a query to the database every 3 hours and
Anything more?
I'd love to see a walkthrough on visualization (how do I make pretty
pictures of my graphs).
Eelco
___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
/writer in Blueprints
http://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints I think)
cheers,
Alex
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.comwrote:
Eelco and all,
did a first screencast on Neoclipse - just for you my friend!
http://vimeo.com/channels/109293#12014944
WDYT
The main alternative we're comparing wicket to is using JSF. The vendor
lockin problem is less of a risk there. If we implement our app with
JSF2.0, we're pretty much guaranteed support and bug fixes for that for 10
years by the commercial app server vendors. If we decide to use
Which of the two is recommended? And how have people been doing this
in practice? I was thinking that if the performance hit would be too
large, I could implement part of my business logic in a separate layer
with Neo4J running embedded, and then expose more course grained
services through
Hi,
What is the best strategy to access a single Neo4J instance from
multiple web application nodes (i.e. a cluster of web application
nodes)? When reading about Remote Graph Database, it seems that it is
only recommended for utility use. Are there any alternatives?
Eelco
What is the best strategy to access a single Neo4J instance from
multiple web application nodes (i.e. a cluster of web application
nodes)? When reading about Remote Graph Database, it seems that it is
only recommended for utility use. Are there any alternatives?
Is it safe/ recommendable for
Are there more logs you can share? Anything that points to what class it is
trying to locate? I don't work with Tomcat often, but remember that
sometimes things get scattered throughout multiple logs.
Eelco
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Angela Day akc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the
Any chance you might have another maverick jar in your class path somehow?
Eelco
--
___
%(real_name)s mailing list
%(real_name)s...@%(host_name)s
2010/4/11 François Meillet fm...@meillet.com:
Hi Wicketers,
1) I need to build a system which can perform
-6000 different users per day
and
-200 concurent users
I can very easily run that on my laptop.
The software used:
wicket
postgresql (mainly read operations)
hibernate
jms
At
And i to the N900..
I want freedom, dont want to be controlled by fruit
That's because you're enough of a fruity yourself. For most people
though, an Apple a day is very healthy.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I might be around even if not attending. Let's ping this list when the
event is nearing to see if we have enough people to meet up at a bar
or something :-)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
What should be the maximum memory usage for this? At the moment it takes
422megabytes and this is definately too much for application without any
load and traffic.
If there is no load and traffic, it isn't Wicket occupying your memory.
Try using something like YourKit
Hi,
I'd like to register a type listener for warp-persistence's
SessionFactory provider. Which unfortunately is package private, so as
a workaround - armed with the knowledge that it is a provider, I
thought I'd do this:
bindListener(Matchers.only(TypeLiteral.get(Types
Let me ask this another way. The following test case succeeds:
public class ATest {
static class A {
final B b;
A(B b) { this.b = b; }
}
static class B {
}
static class AProvider implements ProviderA {
It's been a while, so I don't know how well it works with recent
versions (and whether I would do things differently today), but
there's a few pages on this in Wicket In Action. You can find example
source code here:
com.sun.jersey.server.impl.application.WebApplicationImpl
processRootResources
SEVERE: The ResourceConfig instance does not contain any root resource
classes.
Ah yes, I've seen that before. For some funny reason, Jersey refuses
to start up if it doesn't find anything to work with in the
SEVERE: service exception:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.netdesign.rest.MyResource.getIt(MyResource.java:58)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
Bind the class instead of the instance, so that Guice instantiates the
object, passing in dependencies in the process.
and GatewayPool:
public class GatewayPool {
@Inject
private GatewaysConfiguration configuration;
..
public GatewayPool {
configuration.doSomething();
Hi,
sounds like you want to rewrite gwt but using wicket model for
handling markup instead of layout manages which is what gwt uses. it
is probably much easier to write a library for gwt that implements the
wicket markup model rather then the other way around...
Like this
I'm using a tweaked version of contribs/jersey-guice, part of the
jersey project. See
https://jersey.dev.java.net/nonav/apidocs/1.1.5/contribs/jersey-guice/index.html
Eelco
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:58 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys
First of all thank you
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
no integration needed?
How do you compare (with the repository version or another version, branch)?
how do you check what is all incoming? (synchronize with working sets)
History view: getting a revision, comparing 2
Wicket stores
1. the page,
2. component hierarchy,
3. and associated models (the state) in the page store.
By only the serialized form of the page hierarchy is stored., you mean the
first two things?
The page == component hierarchy and associated models are part of it
because they are
components
in wicket wrappers. the *entire* front end has to live on the frontend
in order for the application to work offline...so whats the point?
anyways my two cents.
cheers,
-igor
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9
Thanks for the kind words people. Definitively a key part of Wicket's
success has been an enthusiastic community.
The learning curve was slightly steep once we started doing interesting UI
interactions (and also that really annoying LazyLoad exception during tests
that I still can't figure
I am working on an application that i want to enable to work offline. I want
to use wicket for this. Any ideas. I would like uses to fill and submit
forms even when working offline and then the data is synchronised later. Is
it possible? all manner of suggestions/links are welcome.
Isn't that
A thousand thanks. Works like a charm.
Though I don't fully understand how the values are
passed through the components/models.
It's three components, one parent (that holds the ultimate value) and
two children (that both hold values used to calculate the parent
value.
convertinput() {
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
having data only on the client will not help you unless you also have
behavior. these kinds of apps are really only feasible when you use a
clientside framework like gwt.
Any components you write wouldn't use the
1 - 100 of 6618 matches
Mail list logo
