Re: [PROPOSAL] - Migrating from Quay to Dockerhub

+1 El dt., 14 de maig 2024, 17:28, Enrique Gonzalez Martinez < egonza...@apache.org> va escriure: > +1 > > El mar, 14 may 2024, 17:25, Thiago Lugli escribió: > > > +1 > > > > For repositories with multiple images the naming should be something like > >

Re: [QUESTION] Usage of `kogito-data-index-ephemeral-nightly:latest` during quarkus:dev

I think the ephemeral data-index is started as a part of the kogito runtime devservices. I think the image name can be changed by setting the `kogito.devservices.imageName` config (or with QUARKUS_KOGITO_DEVSERVICES_IMAGE_NAME env). Here some classes you may find interesting: -

Re: [HEADS-UP] Upgrade Quarkus to 3.8.4 for KIE 10.0.0 release

+1 El dt., 30 d’abr. 2024, 22:53, Eduardo Cerqueira < eduardocerque...@apache.org> va escriure: > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:25 AM Tibor Zimányi > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > this is a status update about the Quarkus upgrade, that is in progress. > > There are PRs open, nearly all

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Task and Management consoles images

+1 El dc., 17 d’abr. 2024, 22:40, Tiago Bento va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > As we approach the Apache KIE 10 release, we're preparing the release > scripts on KIE Tools to publish the Task and Management consoles > images to Quay.io. > > Both images moved permanently from `kogito-images` to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Update of Spring Boot to 3.2.4 for KIE 10 release

+1 @Tibor, `kogito-apps` also has some Spring Boot dependencies in the `data-audit` module, I don't think this could break them but maybe worth looking into. I'll try to give it a test as soon as I can. On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 13:19, Tibor Zimányi wrote: > Hi everyone, > > to make sure we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extension mechanism for additional workflow process definitions elements

+1 On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 12:54, Alex Porcelli wrote: > Glad to hear that! > > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez < > egonza...@apache.org> wrote: > > > It will land after for sure. > > > > El mar, 9 abr 2024, 12:41, Alex Porcelli escribió: > > > > > What about any

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Sonataflow management console

+1 On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 17:19, ricardo zanini fernandes < ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:00 PM Martin Weiler > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Alex Porcelli > > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 8:55 AM > > To:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sonataflow management console

+1 Paulo. I think that makes sense. On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 21:23, Enrique Gonzalez Martinez wrote: > +1 (runtimes constraint accounted for) > > El mié, 3 abr 2024, 21:16, Alex Porcelli escribió: > > > Paulo, > > > > +1 for this proposal. With the caveat highlighted by Enrique that this > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Amended Proposal to unblock Apache KIE 10.0.0 Release

+1 On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 17:00, Luiz Motta wrote: > +1 > > On 2024/03/19 14:11:30 Alex Porcelli wrote: > > With all the feedback from the proposal discussion [1], I am starting > > this official vote to accept the amended proposal to unblock Apache > > KIE 10.0.0 Release. > > > > Here [2] is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Unblocking and releasing Apache KIE 10

I say +1 in order to move forward with the 10. On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 21:45, Alex Porcelli wrote: > +1 > > I spent the last day or so working closely with Tiago, exploring different > options and getting deeper on the impact and evaluating the overall release > procedure steps required. I agree

Re: [HEADS UP] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow starting

I don't think we have any option other than adopt > org.apache.kie.sonataflow. > > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25546 > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:57 PM Pere Fernandez (apache) > wrote: > > > > If that's the case I also +1 to*

Re: [HEADS UP] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow starting

9:00 > > > > > > An: dev@kie.apache.org > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [HEADS UP] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to > > > KIE/SonataFlow > > > > > > starting > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow starting

cardo zanini fernandes < ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Pere! Many thanks for this work! Are you planning to rename SonataFlow > too? If you could do that, I would gently accept your help! > > Cheers! > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:12 PM Pere Fernandez (apache) < &g

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Removing the circular dependency between `kogito-apps` and `kie-tools`

Great news Tiago! Thank you for sharing the plan. Regarding the Quarkus devui's move, I want to give awareness that I already started the GAV's rinaming for all the Quarkus extensions and raised some PR's to kogito-apps (which includes both sonataflow & jbpm Quarkus devui's). Since the extensions

[HEADS UP] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow starting

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that today I have started the extension's renaming based on the proposal's spreadsheet . I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow

t; Sorry if this was mentioned previously, are we planning to do the > > renaming > > > before the release? > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:14 PM Pere Fernandez (apache) < > > > pefer...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > @Kris I still s

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow

-sink-recipient can we add the missing ones in the spreadsheet? On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 09:25, Pere Fernandez (apache) wrote: > +1 to that! > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 23:40, Alex Porcelli wrote: > >> +1 for the streamlined approach >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 5:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow

+1 to that! On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 23:40, Alex Porcelli wrote: > +1 for the streamlined approach > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 5:33 PM Kris Verlaenen > wrote: > > > I believe there is sufficient consensus on the approach so we are > executing > > on this. > > > > Note that the recommendation is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop legacy runtime and KieAssemblerService Drools integration

+1 On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 17:55, Alex Porcelli wrote: > +1 > > With the caveat that I expect this will not interfere in the 10.0.0 > release that I expect we'll be able to start the release procedures in > less than 2 weeks. > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:58 AM Gabriele Cardosi > wrote: > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop support for DRF in bussines automation domain

Sounds good to me, +1 On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:10, Tibor Zimányi wrote: > Hi, > > sounds reasonable. +1 > > Best regards, > Tibor > > > Dňa st 7. 2. 2024, 9:03 Enrique Gonzalez Martinez > napísal(a): > > > The idea is to remove the process definition format in the realm of > > business

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow

Hi Kris, I think the spreadsheet is missing the Data Index Persistence Addons ( *org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-persistence-**) which are in charge of adding the runtime the capability to persist into the Data Index DB (not embedding the Data Index). I'd rename the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Archive incubator-kie-kogito-operator

+1 El dl., 29 de gen. 2024, 17:03, Alex Porcelli va escriure: > Thank you, Ricardo. Looking forward to your assessment. > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:56 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > El lun, 29 ene 2024, 16:55, ricardo zanini fernandes < > > ricardozan...@gmail.com>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changes on "Approve and Run" GH Actions

+1 On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 11:38, Paolo Bizzarri wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 6:30 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > As you may know, only PRs from members get the GH Actions to run > promptly. > > Otherwise, it would require a member to

Re: [URGENT] Finalizing Quarkus 3 migration

fter the migration. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Toshiya > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:06 AM Alex Porcelli > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for Java 17 > > > > -1 for current Quarkus 3.5.2, as expressed earlier I think

Re: [URGENT] Finalizing Quarkus 3 migration

Maven upgrade to 3.9.3 (aligns with Quarkus LTS 3.2.9) > > - 0 neutral for SpringBoot upgrades. As pointed out by Pere, it's not > > a bad idea to try to upgrade SB, but at the same time I don't think > > this is a blocker. > > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 7:26 AM P

Re: [URGENT] Finalizing Quarkus 3 migration

Hi Toshiya, thank you for the recap! Regarding the Spring-boot version, I'd prefer to continue with the version upgrade since most of the recipes/patches already include some changes related to Spring-boot (at least in kogito-runtimes, kogito-apps & kogito-examples), so I think that since we have

Re: [DISCUSSION] Job Service current implementation and Impact on Simplified Architecture

Something we may also need to think about is the communication between the Job-Service and the Data-Index. Currently it Job-Service needs to message the Data-Index when a Job status changes. I think that for the purpose of the Simplified Architecture it should be able to write directly into the

[DISCUSS] Moving "ui-packages" from "kogito-apps" into "kie-tools"

Hello folks, As you may know, the "kogito-apps" repo contains a set of frontend packages inside of the "ui-packages" module. Those packages are used to build the runtime consoles webapps (task/management console) and the Quarkus dev-ui's extensions webapps. The situation is that these