Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
I just got a SDX-300C (35GB native AIT-1) drive for archival dumps. Does
anybody have any experience with these regarding a realistic guesstimate
of hardware compressed capacity? Tapetype?
Here are my defs for AIT-1 with 25G and 35G tapes:
define tapetype
On Feb 9, 2001, "richard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part(a): /home/a to k
Part(b): /home/l to z
How can I do this in my disklist file?
List /home and /home/., and, in the corresponding dumptypes, exclude
./[^a-k]* for Part a and ./[a-k]* for Part b.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana',
Hi all!
I have installed Amanda on a tape server for a long time ago and it works
fine.
The tape server is called fileserver with ip 10.0.1.50 and have an entry in
the DNS, the client is king with ip 10.0.1.49 and have no entry in DNS.
Now, i installed Amanda on a client without Server.
When
On Feb 9, 2001, Juergen Knott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Error: 10.0.1.49: [addr 10.0.1.50: hostname lookup failed]
It means host 10.0.1.49 couldn't find out the name associated with
address 10.0.1.50. Probably some DNS or /etc/hosts configuration
error on host 10.0.1.49
--
Alexandre Oliva
Hi Alexandre!
I have checked the DNS configuration, and thats ok. I find the computers
by giving the name
How about finding the name given the IP? That's what Amanda is
complaining about.
Does `nslookup 10.0.1.50' succeed on 10.0.1.49?
reverselookup was not set correct, i fixed ist.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 at 10:26am, Paul Bijnens wrote
define tapetype AIT1-35 {
comment "AIT-1 cartridge 35/70 GB"
lbl-templ "/var/opt/amanda/etc/lbl-templ/AIT.ps"
length 33200 mbytes # 33400 was lowest seen till now
filemark 500 kbytes
speed 3000 mbytes
}
And here's
I'm new to this mailing list (as of yesterday) but I already agree
with what Ryan wrote. There is NO inconvience is having an
[AMU] appended to the front/end of a message subject; and frankly being
on a couple dozen different mailing lists and recieving on the order of
200 emails a day, things
I should preface what I'm about to say with: I searched through a decent
amount of the archive before giving up. I ran amcheck with the following
results:
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Joseph Del Corso wrote:
There is NO inconvience is having an
[AMU] appended to the front/end of a message subject;
This is an opinion stated as a fact. My opinion is different. Those
6 chars at the beginning force 6 chars of actual information out of
the right end of
Just in case: ( I know I shouldn't use /dev/rd/... I'll fix it
eventually)
SNIP example amdump output
These dumps were to tape DailySet123.
The next 7 tapes Amanda expects to used are: a new tape, a new tape, a
new tape, a new tape, a new tape, a new tape, a new tape.
STATISTICS:
You should really send questions like this to the amanda-users list,
not to one individual. I get, well, more mail than you (see previous
message) each day and read only a small fraction of it on the day it
arrives. A lot of it I never read. I'll cc this to the list since
there are several
Success! Increased dtimeout to 7200 and I now have a good backup of
/home. Thanks a ton for all the help.
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Feb 8, 2001, Chris Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is the case, then the culprit appears to be the first gtar, as
it has taken forever to start
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:27:01AM -0500, Joseph Del Corso wrote:
I should preface what I'm about to say with: I searched through a decent
amount of the archive before giving up. I ran amcheck with the following
results:
Use the messages, Luke.
A couple things I see, commented below:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2001, Joseph Del Corso wrote:
I should preface what I'm about to say with: I searched through a decent
amount of the archive before giving up. I ran amcheck with the following
results:
At 10:27 AM 2/9/01 -0500, Joseph Del Corso wrote:
I should preface what I'm about to say with: I searched through a decent
amount of the archive before giving up. I ran amcheck with the following
results:
Amanda Tape
On the client machine, where do I set the option of --ignore-failed-read
because I see that the version of tar I have there, does have this option.
Thank you
At 08:21 PM 02/08/2001 , you wrote:
On Feb 8, 2001, "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's too bad tar doesn't have a flag
How can I restore Winnt-Computer with amrestore?
Thanks for Help
Mit freundlichen Gr|_en
___
Robert PirontInstitut fuer Elektrische
Tel.: +49-241-807660 Anlagen und
Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
be a burden for you. For many of us that's a light day. The list
messages are
On Fri, 09 Feb 2001, Ryan Williams wrote:
Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
be a burden for you. For many of us
I can see where it would help if you didn't have some way to filter mail,
but
mostly the Sender: header is correct.
I'm running Outlook (don't go there) to read E-mail
and have been completely unable to get the filtering to
work. Something in the subject is easy for Outlook
but it barfs on
On Feb 9, 2001, Roger Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the client machine, where do I set the option of
--ignore-failed-read because I see that the version of tar I have
there, does have this option.
Amanda already uses it, but older versions of GNU tar didn't do the
right thing with it.
I'm new to this mailing list (as of yesterday) ...
Welcome!
If I may make a short comment. This discussion about E-mail and Subject
lines is not at all typical of this mailing list. I've already seen
more heat about this than the last 1000 other postings. So please don't
judge it just based
define tapetype HP-SURESTORE-DAT40 {
comment "just produced by tapetype program"
length 19560 mbytes
filemark 1147 kbytes
speed 2957 kps
}
richard wrote:
Dear all,
I have just bought a new HP DAT40i. May I know if someone can tell me its
setting for the amanda.conf file?
How do I get Amanda to use this option since it is not doing it
automatically and the tar on the client machine has this option available?
What do you mean it's not doing it? According to the sources I have,
and several examples posted here over the last few weeks, Amanda always
uses the
ERROR: king: [access as amanda not allowed from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] amandahostsauth failed
...
On the fileserver under /home/amanda exist a file called .amandahosts and i
have king and fileserver in it.
I assume /home/amanda is the home directory for user "amanda"?
The .amandahosts file must
And in /home/amanda/.amandahosts on server.example.org is :
Are you sure /home/amanda is the home directory for "amanda"?
Is the file owned by "amanda"? Is it mode 0600 or 0400?
client.example.org root
This is the line that matters on the server. Are you sure you spelled
the hostname
It was my understanding that it should restore the file to whatever the
current directory
was when I started amrecover (or whatever I 'lcd' to). Is this not the
case?
Sort of. It (actually, your restore program -- this has nothing
to do with Amanda) will create a directory tree in your current
I run tapetype xx /dev/st0 and create an input to amanda.conf
You **must** use the no-rewind device name for **all** Amanda work.
That's probably /dev/nst0.
When I execute amcheck I get 2 errors:
- server side : /dev/st0 no amanda tape. I probed /dev/nst0 too
Did you
First I have the patches for the 2.2.16 kernel from On-Stream and the
drive seems to work fine w/ tar and the "mt" commands. And yes I did
read the "DI-30" is broken, but those messages seem to pre-date the
patches from OnStream.
It's nice to know they are working on this, however ...
I'm
Thanks for the script.
I'll give it a try.
Make sure you notice that word "untested" :-).
... How do I make an
Amanda "RPM" (or equivalent) so I can install 2.4.2p1 (both client
and server) on the appropriate machine(s) ?
'Fraid I can't help with RPM's. On my (Solaris/AIX) systems, I build
Ryan Williams wrote:
Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
be a burden for you. For many of us that's a light day.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Yura Pismerov wrote:
mt comp off should work fine for AIT2.
At least is working for me.
How do you know it does not work ?
I don't.
It should be reported by "mt status".
mt status says the same thing no matter what I do with mt comp,
mt
32 matches
Mail list logo
