Carlos,
On 8/5/2009 7:15 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I checked and the settings appear to be coming from
> "20-debian_default" as follows:
>
> $final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (data not lost, see virus
> quarantine)
> $final_banned_destiny = D_BOUNCE; # D_REJECT when front-end MTA
On 8/5/2009 8:18 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> on a system without pen pals, bouncekiller or anything that I can think
> of that would do this,
>
> I keep getting an AMBOOST:5 on emails from cdpublications.
> from:Community Health Funding Report
^^
Jeff,
On 7/27/2009 1:32 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> I am running Postfix 2.6.2 and Amavis 2.6.4 together. Everything is
> running smoothly except for one problem. When a user connects remotely and
> sends a message, I get the following line in my amavis-logwatch output:
>
> 1 *Warning: Security r
Stefan,
On 7/8/2009 7:54 AM, Stefan Palme wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question concerning the log entries created by amavisd-new:
>
> Passed SPAM, [209.85.23.242] [77.61.136.43] ->...
>
> What is the meaning of the two IP addresses?
>
See:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&m=117941930332
>>> From a spam message:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.168+5 tag=5.9 tag2=6.4 kill=6.9
>> tests=[AM:BOOST=5,
>> AWL=0.495, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
>> MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
>>
>> 2.168+5? 216800? Why the scientific notation?
On 5/21/2009 5:50 AM, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>>
>> What is the value of your AMAVISD_DB_HOME environment variable?
>>
>> # echo AMAVISD_DB_HOME
>
> Perhaps you mean 'echo $AMAVISD_DB_HOME', right? It's empty.
>
>
> Mark Martinec
Zhang,
On 5/19/09 10:21 PM, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
> Hi, list
>
> When running amavisd-nanny, i got below msg, however the execution
> of amavisd-nanny appears to be correct. Configure error or whatever?
>
>
> # amavisd-nanny
> Useless use of hash element in void context at /usr/sbin/a
On 3/10/2009 3:26 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
> Patrick Wong wrote:
>> Yes Bill, I can confirm that 0.33 is available from CPAN cause I just
>> did it this morning after reading Mark's notes.
> Not for me. Just now tried again:
>
> cpan[1]> install Mail::DKIM
> CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.18)
> Going
ntain encoded personal information, and sanitizing takes
time, or isn't obvious.
I see many from the NRA (nra-ila_ale...@www.ilaalerts.org), Wachovia
(customerserv...@wachoviapossibilities.com, http://dls-email.b=
fi0.com), etc.
I'm not sure what is safe to sanitize, strip, remove.
I&#
> On 1/15/09, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
>> Hi! Networkers,
>>
>> We are using, with success, amavisd-new + clamav
>>
>> We are using http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf
>> for scoring based on clamav analysis.
>>
>> Lately, we notice, in our logs, that some email hits the rule
>
Henrik K wrote:
> FYI, you should replace..
>
> header L_AV_MSRBL_Img X-Amavis-AV-Status =~ m{\bAV:MSRBL-Images/}
>
> ->
>
> header L_AV_MSRBL_Img X-Amavis-AV-Status =~ m{\bAV:MSRBL-Images\b}
>
... as well any @virus_name_to_spam_score_maps rules referencing
MSRBL-Images that includes a s
amavisd.conf file being edited is not the file
being used. What does your amavisd startup script look like (in
/etc/init.d or /etc/rc.d I presume, but this is distro-dependant, or how
you actually start amavisd may be custom)
Do any of the settings below work, or have you had luck when chang
FYI...
This change affects @virus_name_to_spam_score_maps, used to turn
Sanesecurity ClamAV hits into spam scores. Note the new naming scheme: Eg:
@virus_name_to_spam_score_maps =
(new_RE( # [ qr'^(Email|HTML)\.(Phishing|Spam|Scam[a-z0-9]?)\.'i =>
0.1 ],
[ qr'^Sanesecurity\.Malwar
nk=gst&q=uvscan+MrC#1cf69cf9691e083f
> Amavisd-new at the moment is using only CLAMAV. If it crash or stops
> working for some reason, my mail gateway doesn't deliver email at all.
> Since I find CLAMAV an effective virus scanner, I would like a similar
> tool (demonized, ope
p;segment=small
>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.unix.amavis-
>>
> user/browse_thread/thread/290df7dc7b1fcb39/1cf69cf9691e083f?lnk=gst&q=u
>> vscan+MrC#1cf69cf9691e083f
>
> Thanks,
>
> rocsca
---
Clemens von Musil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the day before yesterday, my amavis started to fail with following log
> line per scanned email:
>
>
> 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=18143-02, decoding2-get-file-types
> FAILED: 'file' utility (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at
> /usr/sbin/amavis
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> I read and made the following changes:
>
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 'undef';
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.3;
> $sa_kill_level_deflt = 15.0;
> $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 15.0;
>
>
> $final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (defaults to D_BOUNCE)
> $final_banned_destiny = D_
t find anything
> that was not extremely old and did not apply or did not apply to Exim4
> MTA rather than Postfix MTA.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
>
GaryV's documents here are all very good and thorough:
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/
MrC
--
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> I want my amavis discard messages with score above 10, for example, that
> delivered the messages with scores below that.
>
> Thus, the score that set to be classified as spam was 7.
> So anything above 10 should be discarded and between 7 and 10 delivered.
>
> I saw that
jonathan wrote:
> as a relevant point, the newest unix (Solaris) command-line uvscan is
> almost twice as fast as the previous one - upgrading this is making a
> massive performance difference.
Agreed. I updated my NetBSD system from the 5.2 engine to 5.3. The
claimed performance gains from 5.1
jonathan wrote:
> aha: I'm not seeing the directory name in my ps list due to the
> command-line printout cutoff, which conveniently chops off right after
> /var/amavis/tmp/. Increasing my amavis loglevel shows the correct
> directory being scanned.
>
> I'm still not sure why I don't see a corres
jonathan wrote:
> My amavisd.conf is using a standard configuration for uvscan:
>
>### http://www.nai.com/
>['NAI McAfee AntiVirus (uvscan)', 'uvscan',
> '--secure -rv --mime --summary --noboot - {}', [0], [13],
> qr/(?x) Found (?:
> \ the\ (.+)\ (?:virus|trojan) |
>
# log via syslogd (preferred)
This will place log entries in the location specified in syslog.conf for
mail.debug and higher priorities.
Here is an alternative method:
http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.unix.amavis-user/browse_
> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> is it possible to log subject with amavis? I konw that it is a werid
>> question.
>
> Amavisd-new doesn't do this by default, but you can hack the
> code if you really need it logged by amavisd-new.
and yet another alternative is to uncomment:
#[?
Voytek Eymont wrote:
> On Sat, July 19, 2008 9:00 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
> now I noticed in mailq there are things with 'failed seek ... File::Temp'
> I've reinstalled File::Temp, reloaded amavisd, flush and requed queue
reinstalled from what source ?
See:
http://www.webservertalk.com/arch
Voytek Eymont wrote:
> On Sat, July 19, 2008 5:32 pm, MrC wrote:
>> Voytek Eymont wrote:
> # service amavisd start
> Starting Mail Virus Scanner (amavisd): [ OK ]
> #
>
> thanks !
>
Good news, you're welcome.
>> In general, it
Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
>> In general, it is a bad idea to mix-n-match CPAN with your disto
>> packages, unless you understand the the interdependencies of the
>> parallel module trees that get created under site_perl and vendor_perl.
>>
>> MrC
>
> If yo
Voytek Eymont wrote:
> On Sat, July 19, 2008 2:37 pm, MrC wrote:
>> Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
>>> then it fails
>>> what went wrong with my perl ?
>
>> I think this has occurred for you not too long ago. Have you looked
>> through the past threads
to the queue
>
> then it fails
>
> what went wrong with my perl ?
>
I think this has occurred for you not too long ago. Have you looked
through the past threads here:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&w=2&r=
Benedict White wrote:
>
>>>> MrC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/16/08 04:46pm >>>
> Benedict White wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have had a bit of trouble with the following message:
>>
>> (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in p
Benedict White wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have had a bit of trouble with the following message:
>
> (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=07140-17,
> parts_decode_ext FAILED:
> file(1) utility (/usr/bin/file) error: run_command (open pipe): Can't fork at
> /usr/lib/perl
I found two empty _WARN: messages in my logs yesterday:
Jul 12 08:25:33 glacier amavis[20148]: (20148-01) Checking: cNMHslFYu3bd
MYNETS [127.0.0.1] <> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jul 12 08:25:33 glacier amavis[20148]: (20148-01) _WARN:
Jul 12 08:25:33 glacier amavis[20148]: (20148-01) _WARN:
Jul
Juan Miscaro wrote:
> I've seen a thread [0] on this but it was inconclusive. Is this being
> looked at? I'm using 2.6.0.
>
> When starting amavisd-new from my home directory I get this kind of stuff:
>
> fetch_modules: error loading optional module IP/Country/Fast.pm:
> Requiring lib/IP/Coun
Juan Miscaro wrote:
>> MrC wrote:
>> Are there p0f stats in your logs ?
>>
>> If so, and they have sufficient data, they might be a candidate for
>> inclusion in amavis-logwatch. I don't use it, so have no data to base
>> implementation on.
>
> As
Leo Baltus wrote:
> Op 23/06/2008 om 21:38:17 -0700, schreef MrC:
>> Christian Purnomo wrote:
>>> Our bayes DB is a berkeley db on a filesystem:
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~amavis/.spamassassin # ls -la bayes_*
>>> -rw--- 1 amavis amavis 8376 20
change, I would be able to
> propose a project to investigate the use of database for the bayes db.
Have you looked at the TIMING log entries (log_level=2) ?
btw. I think you might not have included your amavis-agent report - it
didn't come though on my end.
MrC
--
Christian Purnomo wrote:
> : Are your queues filled with bounce messages because you are accepting
> : mail to unknown recipients? Are you rejecting unknown recipients at the
> : first postfix instance.
>
> HI MrC
>
> Yes, more than 50% of the emails in the queue are Non-
>> We are running Postfix + amavisd-new-2.3.3-3 in our linux mail gateway.
>> We have been hit hard lately with SPAM and our mail queue has been
>> growing significantly to 10,000+ mails and it takes a few hours for the
>> queue to go down. We received 1.6million spam messages last month and I
>> b
Luis,
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
> Hi, this message ir really destined to Mike Capella, but I decided to
> shot it here, since many of the users in this list use
> amavis-logwatch.
There's a website and a mailing list for amavis-logwatch and
postfix-logwatch:
http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch
MrC wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>> I'm trying to install amavisd-new on my mail server, a Mac Mini
>> (Intel) running the non-Server version of OS X 10.4.11.
>>
>> When I try to start up amavisd I get a setrgid error:
>>
>> sudo /usr/local/sb
James Brown wrote:
> I'm trying to install amavisd-new on my mail server, a Mac Mini
> (Intel) running the non-Server version of OS X 10.4.11.
>
> When I try to start up amavisd I get a setrgid error:
>
> sudo /usr/local/sbin/amavisd -u amavisd debug
> setrgid() not implemented at /usr/local/sb
Hannes Erven wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> ... and the user must be considered a local user, so check your
>> @local_domains_maps.
>
> Thanks Mike (again ;-]) for the hint -- this really was the reason. I
> rechecked, and noticed that the *last* domain in my @local_domains_ma
Hannes Erven wrote:
> I have two seperate amavis installations at customer's sites. The
> /etc/amavisd.conf file as well as /usr/sbin/amavisd are identical
> (despite the site-specific changes in amavisd.conf).
>
> At one site, amavis logs SPAM-TAG lines for every message, at the other
> it d
>> Would it be useful to show the number of hits for each test in the
>> Timings reports, as in (the parenthesis below):
>> ...
>> 1544 Total messages scanned
>> ...
>>
>> ===
>> Scan Time Percentiles % Time Total (s) 1
Stefan Förster wrote:
> * Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> Is the ration (one third of all computing time consumed by it)
>>> a normal one ("to be expected") or is this indicating some serious
>>> misconfiguration on my part?
>> It is not normal. It typically takes a couple of dozens of milliseconds.
>
>
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
>
> MrC escreveu:
>> Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have banned some file/MIME types in amavisd-2.6.0 using the 'old'
>>> way of doing this, the
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have banned some file/MIME types in amavisd-2.6.0 using the 'old'
> way of doing this, the $banned_filename_re.
>
> The banned file admin and user notifications, which i enabled,
> brings me something like:
>
> Banned name: multi
s to 0; this
means to *allow* this type. Mappings without a value default to 1,
which would mean *disallow*.
You may want to consider including the appropriate MIME types (eg.
application/x-msdos-program) for rejection as well. Look at the default
and sample $banned_filename_re rules in amavisd.conf-d
Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I enforce mails to be sent in a 7bit MIME format instead of 8
> bits while using a Amavis system ?
>
> BR
Search 8BITMIME in :
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html
--
sed/Blocked line with the level 2 output pNNN lines:
... (28512-01) p001 1/1/1 Content-Type: text/plain, size: 2749 B, name:
Note that these process IDs are reused, so you have to limit your search.
See the amavis.conf-sample log file for an example of $log_templ.
MrC
>
> i have tr
Hi Mark,
In amavis 2.6.0, it appears the $feedback_type is hardcoded as 'abuse'
for request type 'report' and 'miscategorized' for 'release' and 'requeue' :
sub process_policy_request() {
...
: $req =~ /^(?:release|requeue|report)\z/
? dispatch_from_quarantine($conn,$msginfo
Robert Brooks wrote:
MrC wrote:
Rob,
I have not seen the ":unknown" port in my logs nor had others report
this, so I suppose it is the less common pre-queue setup that is the
difference.
I always was the wierdo :)
I'm about to update postfix-logwatch with some other fixes
stfix-logwatch with some other fixes/features. If
this is still an issue for you, I can provide a fix for this.
btw. I just updated amavis-logwatch as well.
MrC
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: postfix-2.5.1 - smtpd logging ":unknown" on client lines
> Date:
ere;
>
> but, I'm still:
>
> # amavisd --version
> ERROR: MISSING REQUIRED BASIC MODULES:
> Compress::Zlib
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/amavisd line 171.
>
What is returned from the following command:
perl -e 'use Compress::Zlib;'
MrC
RROR: MISSING REQUIRED BASIC MODULES:
> Compress::Zlib
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/amavisd line 171.
>
> uname -a
> Linux 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL #1 Thu Sep 27 18:10:45 EDT 2007 i686 i686
Make sure to also updat
Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Below is info on "Unmatched Entries" I get in Logwatch report:
>
> **Unmatched Entries**
> 1 (21112-20) DEFANGING MAIL: WARNING: bad headers - Improper use
> of control character (char 0D hex): To:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,\\n\\t<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
massassin/local.cf
When you run the messages through spamassassin only, amavis-specific
score adjustments will not occur, so the scores will differ.
Increase amavis' $log_level to 3, and look for the tests and scores in
the log lines:
... tests=
See which tests and scores are presen
Jo Rhett wrote:
>> RJ45 wrote:
>>> thanks,
>>> but I meant is there a way to do it with sendmail ?
>
> On Feb 13, 2008, at 9:12 AM, MrC wrote:
>> Sendmail just drops a queue file; it does not use SMTP. So you must
>> configure the service that handles th
RJ45 wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, MrC wrote:
>
>>
>> Setup submission service in postfix, and have its content_filter port
>> 10026 (for example):
>>
>> ...
>> -o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10026
>>
>>
# don't spam scan
bypass_virus_checks_maps => [1], # don't virus scan
...
};
As above, you can set your MYNETS policy bank to avoid what scanning you
desire as well.
These will skip checks for your n
ant most likely
> 5. Although some of the processes are older, we have had this issue
> regardless of versions (we will be upgrading in the next few days,
> Amavisd, PF, SA, and ClamAV).
>
> I can send a copy of the amavisd.conf if needed...
I think more important than the conf is da
my(%field_head_counts);
my($allowed_tests) = cr('allowed_header_tests');
my(%t) = !ref($allowed_tests) ? () : %$allowed_tests;
...
MrC
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenge
y 0 or 9 characters,
followed by "sex" (or other). See the patterns in 20_porn.cf, wherever
that may reside on your system.
b) the local.cf is not in the correct location. Use amavis debug-sa to
see which local.cf spamassassin/amavis is using.
MrC
--
Andrea Bencini wrote:
> I installed postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8, amavisd-new-2.5.2-2.fc8 and
> spamassassin-3.2.3-2.fc8.
> They are running.
> I would like to test spam changing "score" in local.cf.
> My local.cf is:
>
> report_safe 0
> use_bayes 1
> use_bayes_rules 1
> skip_rbl_checks 0
> bayes_path /
r field syntax error
>> - missing required header field
>> - duplicate header field
>>
You can decided how you want to handle them (quarantine, ignore, etc).
MrC
>> In addition, syntax errors in MIME structure as reported
>> by MIME::Parser are included in this cate
unpacker to fail. Be sure you are doing proper recipient
validation.
In any case, you can always remove older temporary directories, for
example, using a cron job to remove anything older than say a couple of
days.
MrC
> In a post I found that emptying the /tmp directory would fix the problem
>
nserted?" here :
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq-gen
MrC
> I check the headers and see (some headers removed)...
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 9.498
> X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.498 tagged_above=2 required=5
> tests=[BAYES_99=3.5,
gt;> or directory at /usr/local/sbin/amavisd-release line 202.
>> What is the value of socketname in /usr/local/sbin/amavisd-release?
>>
>> MrC
>
> Oh, I see...
>
> It is:
>
> $socketname = '/var/amavis/home/amavisd.sock';
>
> I have changed i
ocal/sbin/amavisd-release?
MrC
> In /usr/local/etc/amavisd.conf I have:
>
> $MYHOME = '/var/amavis';
> $interface_policy{'SOCK'} = 'AM.PDP-SOCK';
> $policy_bank{'AM.PDP-SOCK'} = {
> protocol => 'AM.PDP',
> auth_requir
Jo Rhett wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> This is *not* a mail server issue. The mail server is not converting
>> the attachments; rather, the MUA is displaying the attachment
>> differently for user 1 & 2 vs. 3.
>
> Um, not it's not, sorry. Outlook will send
MrC wrote:
> Miguel wrote:
>> Gary V escribió:
>>> On 1/24/08, Miguel wrote:
>>>
...
>
> Have you installed the TNEF plugin, and is it enabled for user 3?
>
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=62
>
> This is *not* a mail server iss
nter using server3 credential, i see only winmail.dat file, the same as
> in outlook,
> miguel
Have you installed the TNEF plugin, and is it enabled for user 3?
http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=62
This is *not* a mail server issue. The mail server is not converting
the attachment
pl)$'i,# banned extension - basic
[ qr'^\.(zip|rar|arc|arj|zoo)$'=> 0 ], # allow within archives
};
The first should do what you want, while the second will not. If this
isn't clear, show your $banned_filename_re map.
MrC
size limitation; rather
the decompressor is failing.
I'm not aware of any per-attachment type size limit settings.
MrC
>
> My mailog list：
>
> Jan 24 10:27:23 fbsd postfix/smtpd[1798]: connect from
> localhost.metaworks.com.cn[127.0.0.1]
> Jan 24 10:27:23 fbsd postfix/smtpd
Mark,
>> After updating perl on my netbsd system, I encountered the same issue
>> with amavis indicating that Compress::Zlib was missing. The error
>> message is somewhat misleading. The module exists, it just fails to load.
>
> Right. I encountered such problems in the past. My simple attem
cular reports
>>>> for .pl files under unicore/lib. It is not a bug and
>>>> there is nothing I can do (except to suppress logging it).
>>>> Files under perl.../unicore/lib are not true perl modules,
>>>> and can not be loaded once and for all, per
o bounce, or
configure your MSA/MTA to reject.
If Amavis is used in a before-queue fashion, you can reject.
What is your setup ?
MrC
>
> Thanks in advence,
>
>
> Luis
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Chec
can do (except to suppress logging it).
>> Files under perl.../unicore/lib are not true perl modules,
>> and can not be loaded once and for all, perl wants
>> to be able to read them as needed.
>>
Perhaps I should just have amavis-logwatch ignore these...?
MrC
--
it in two or three days.
> There are no compatibility issues with 2.5.2.
No issues seen thus far.
MrC
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell
Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:39 PM, MrC wrote:
>>>Hey folks. It looks to me like amavisd-new isn't logging the
>>> SpamAssassin rules summary for messages that *don't* get tagged
>>> as spam. I can't believe I've never no
s seems to be the case.
>
Lower the value of $sa_tag_level_deflt, as in :
$sa_tag_level_deflt = undef; # add spam info headers if at, or above
that level
MrC
>Basically I have a spam message that made it through the filters,
> and according to the logs it scored a few points unde
e: *** [all] Error 2
>
> Regards
>
The arj build system is very non-standard. Ignore the "error" above,
and look in linux-gnu/en/rs/arj. You should find arj built and ready
for install.
MrC
-
SF.Ne
lternatively, you can use per-recipient soft white/black listing:
@score_sender_maps = ({
# a by-recipient hash lookup table,
# results from all matching recipient tables are summed
## per-recipient tables (NOTE: positive: black, negative: white)
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' => [{'[EMA
d? Which platform?
MrC
> Regards
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Peter Sørensen
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.c
hishing|Spam|Scam[a-z0-9]?)\.'i => 6.0 ],
));
This will treat clamav's phishing hits as spam hits, boosting the score
by 6.00 (set the values as you see fit). See the amavisd.conf file and
documentation.
MrC
>
> Content type: Virus (9,0)
> Internal reference code for th
ago on the list about the necessity to
recompile when perl is upgraded.
MrC
>>> Run 'perl -V' to determine the version of Perl:
>>>
>>> # perl -V
>> I get:
>> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:
>> ...
>
Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm installing a new mail server on Gentoo (moving from SLES9),
>
> When I send some test mails I can see that most of processing time is spent
> on:
> SMTP DATA: 37 (34%)38
> fwd-connect: 17 (15%)77
>
> Is there a way to improve these timings or is it OK?
his
text section"). These templates are what you customize, by replacing,
for example %d, with the desired time macro. Search "%d" downward after
you are at the first template, and you'll find a line that starts with
Date: %d
This should get your started.
MrC
---
Robert Brooks wrote:
> Mark Martinec wrote:
> I mean something like this...
> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
>> Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
>> into ar
AMS in total were passed as in recipient is spam_lover?
>
You'll have to examine your configuration to know the exact reason for
why they were passed. It could be spam lovers, it could be a policy
bank (such as MYNETS), or other reasons.
MrC
---
Price was reasonable enough for my
needs. It does have a very large signature database.
$ uvscan --version
Virus Scan for Linux v5.20.0
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 McAfee, Inc. All rights reserved.
(408) 988-3832 LICENSED COPY - Jun 5 2007
Scan engine v5.2.00 for Linux.
Virus data
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Robert Brooks wrote:
>
> [..] (discussing postfix-logwatch log analyser)
>
>>> whilst I'm being a pain the Postfix reject figures don't show
>>> rejections from before-queue amavis. Unfortunately Postfix doesn
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>>> Mark Martinec wrote:
>>>>>>> I mean something like this...
>>>>>>> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
>>>>>>> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.
> Mark Martinec wrote:
> I mean something like this...
> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
>> Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
>> into arbitrary buckets, fill
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Robert Brooks wrote:
>>> MrC wrote:
> I mean something like this...
>
>
> Spam Score -5
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> I see. Its easy enough to implement. I had originally not seen much
>> value in those numbers, but will be happy to add the feature if it is
>> useful.
>
> seeing the overall performance of amavis is useful to me, especially as
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Is your request different from the timings percentiles report that
>> currently exists ? Example at the end of:
>>
>>http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/example-amavis-detail10
>>
>> It is
- smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o broken_sasl_auth_clients=yes
-o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_address_mappings
-o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Benedict - feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or
>> improvement requests. I have just made some recent experimental
>> changes in the summary presentation, and am looking for feedback on
>> that in particular.
>
Dave Augustus wrote:
> I maintain a number of mail servers. The configuration of those are all
> the same except for a few lines. If I put a file containing these
> exceptions in /etc, how would I tell amavisd to include it?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
Either by starting amavisd with multiple -c comman
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
