On fre 10 sep 2010 20:57:21 CEST, Yassen Damyanov wrote
I am trying very hard to find a way to achieve this, so far to no
avail. Anyone to come to the rescue? Thanks in advance!
one of the latest amavisd-new its possible to use spamc, but i hope it
will be resolved in perl where each msg
Hello all,
I run a mail server hosting several domains, basically a classic postfix +
amavisd-new + clamav + spamassassin setup; and I do need help for the following:
I want amavisd-new/spamassassin use a different Spamassassin Bayes database for
each separate domain hosted on my mail server.
On 9/10/10 2:57 PM, Yassen Damyanov wrote:
Hello all,
I run a mail server hosting several domains, basically a classic postfix +
amavisd-new + clamav + spamassassin setup; and I do need help for the
following:
I want amavisd-new/spamassassin use a different Spamassassin Bayes database
Ralf,
Is $forward_method = 'smtp:hostname:11011';
subject to MX lookups for hostname?
No, it is not. Just the name resolution as provided by
the underlying Net::INET module, nothing fancy about it.
I'm trying to avoid queueing by simpling using different
forward_methods for different
Is
$forward_method = 'smtp:hostname:11011';
subject to MX lookups for hostname?
I'm trying to avoid queueing by simpling using different
forward_methods for different downstream hosts :)
E.g. if a mail goes to domain1.de and domain2.de I'm using
transport_maps to deliver the mail to
On 4/20/10 4:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Is
$forward_method = 'smtp:hostname:11011';
subject to MX lookups for hostname?
I'm trying to avoid queueing by simpling using different
forward_methods for different downstream hosts :)
would be cool. could do load balancing, failover also.
* Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net:
On 4/20/10 4:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Is
$forward_method = 'smtp:hostname:11011';
subject to MX lookups for hostname?
I'm trying to avoid queueing by simpling using different
forward_methods for different downstream hosts :)
On Monday 18 January 2010 14:31:23 Andreas Schulze wrote:
Am 18.01.2010 13:41 schrieb Mark Martinec:
(the old milter in the amavisd package does not support
dynamically changing header fields).
isn't it time to stop distibuting old software ?
Agreed.
Ditching the whole helper-progs
Marcus,
I'm not sure, if I understand the FAQ under No spam-related headers
inserted? and Sendmail milter correctly: it is _not_ possible to add
X-Spam-Status to the header and using $sa_spam_subject_tag to rewrite
the Subject: when running amavisd-new with amavisd-new-milter and
sendmail?
Hi,
I'm not sure, if I understand the FAQ under No spam-related headers
inserted? and Sendmail milter correctly: it is _not_ possible to add
X-Spam-Status to the header and using $sa_spam_subject_tag to rewrite
the Subject: when running amavisd-new with amavisd-new-milter and
sendmail?
I'm
troxlinux a écrit :
I solved my problem , the problema was this line
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain .domain.net.ni .domain.org.ni] )
you were quoting the whole list, which makes it a single string.
y changed this form
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain] )
if you need to add
I solved my problem , the problema was this line
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain .domain.net.ni .domain.org.ni] )
y changed this form
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain] )
thnk
regardss
2009/5/11 Daniel Luttermann dan...@dlutt.de:
if I have configured that option, but I forget to
troxlinux wrote:
if I have configured that option, but I forget to comment that my
domains are virtual with postfix and use mysql
$mydomain = 'domain.org.ni'
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain .domain.net.ni .domain.org.ni] )
It's not needed that you set your domain twice here ($mydomain
troxlinux a écrit :
Hi list, I am trying to configure amavisd-new 2.6.2-3.1 with
spamassassin 3.2.5 + dcc +razor2+dkim , and for some reason, which is
not able to identify some mail like spam, doesn't mark them , for
example the test of GTUBE it doesn't put in the subject SPAM.
is the
if I have configured that option, but I forget to comment that my
domains are virtual with postfix and use mysql
$mydomain = 'domain.org.ni'
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain .domain.net.ni .domain.org.ni] )
this has me concerned
any help is appreciate!...
regardss
2009/5/10 mouss
Hi list, I am trying to configure amavisd-new 2.6.2-3.1 with
spamassassin 3.2.5 + dcc +razor2+dkim , and for some reason, which is
not able to identify some mail like spam, doesn't mark them , for
example the test of GTUBE it doesn't put in the subject SPAM.
I have in the local.cf this it lines
Dear list,
I get spam like this
mail01:/var/log# grep pasovarsky_aemxyz syslog.0
Nov 18 13:36:20 mail01 postfix/qmgr[27109]: A5320950006:
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1760, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Nov 18 13:36:20 mail01 amavis[15852]: (15852-11) ESMTP::10024
Karsten,
Nov 18 13:36:22 mail01 amavis[15852]: (15852-11) Passed SPAMMY,
[80.67.18.000] [89.101.56.41] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id:
r6afH9rLp+KS, Hits: 8.349, size: 1760, queued_as: 4021F950009, 1589 ms
Its obviously found spammy.
But for
Mark Martinec schrieb:
My first guess is that recipient is not considered local.
If that is not the case, some logging would be helpful.
-_- Ah stupid me.
I was so sure its in the list because its generated automatically by a
script.
@local_domains_maps = (
I was seeing the effects of dcc/razor/pyzor in/out by editing local.cf and
v310.pre.
Put stuff in and out a few times, no problem, then one time amavis wouldn't
start with:
Sep 23 09:59:25 mx1 amavis[25348]: SpamControl: initializing Mail::SpamAssassin
Sep 23 09:59:28 mx1 amavis[25348]:
Raj,
I have a small script that parses Amavis logs with subject in them.
The problem with Subject logging is that subject is printed as such
delimited by , but the exact characters can appear as subject with
out any escaping. So it cannot be parsed reliably. Is it possible to
(optionally)
Hi,
I have a small script that parses Amavis logs with subject in them.
The problem with Subject logging is that subject is printed as such
delimited by , but the exact characters can appear as subject with
out any escaping. So it cannot be parsed reliably. Is it possible to
(optionally) encode
Hi
is it possible to log subject with amavis? I konw that it is a werid
question.
LD
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Hi
is it possible to log subject with amavis? I konw that it is a werid
question.
Amavisd-new doesn't do this by default, but you can hack the
code if you really need it logged by amavisd-new.
If you're using postfix as your MTA, it's trivial to log the
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Hi
is it possible to log subject with amavis? I konw that it is a werid
question.
Amavisd-new doesn't do this by default, but you can hack the
code if you really need it logged by amavisd-new.
and yet another alternative is to uncomment:
#[?
Merci
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Hi
is it possible to log subject with amavis? I konw that it is a werid
question.
Amavisd-new doesn't do this by default, but you can hack the
code if you really need it logged by amavisd-new.
If you're using postfix as your MTA, it's trivial
-
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom.
I noticed in:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#features-virus
That its possible to:
specify recipients who want to receive viruses (with alert header
field added, contents optionally pushed to an attachment), fully per-user
configurable even with multi-recipient mail;
I'd like to use the
Hi All
Im running postfix, clamav, spamasssasin and amavisd-new-2.5.1. Im
trying to get a sender whitelist working.
I have added the following in my amavisd.conf file, what im wondering is
how do i tell if this is actually working and reading my whitelist table
@whitelist_sender_maps = (
Luke wrote:
Hi All
Im running postfix, clamav, spamasssasin and amavisd-new-2.5.1. Im
trying to get a sender whitelist working.
I have added the following in my amavisd.conf file, what im wondering is
how do i tell if this is actually working and reading my whitelist table
Thanks Gary, I will check this out
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
Sent: Tuesday, 31 July 2007 12:28 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] (no subject)
Luke wrote:
Hi All
Im running postfix, clamav
Cian,
I was wondering if there's an easy way of getting amavisd-new to
rewrite the subject of virus infected e-mail? I just want to add a
INFECTED tag or something.
...
As far as I know, the $defang_virus = 1 will change the body
so isn't really an option for us.
It does add '***INFECTED***
Cian Davis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was wondering if there's an easy way of getting amavisd-new to
rewrite the subject of virus infected e-mail? I just want to add a
INFECTED tag or something. Our users scream if we bounce any mail on
them but most
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, mouss wrote:
Cian Davis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was wondering if there's an easy way of getting amavisd-new to
rewrite the subject of virus infected e-mail? I just want to add a
INFECTED tag or something. Our users scream if we
Tomas wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, mouss wrote:
Cian Davis wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there's an easy way of getting amavisd-new to
rewrite the subject of virus infected e-mail? I just want to add a
INFECTED tag or something. Our users scream if we bounce any mail on
them but most
Tomas Macek wrote:
But if the user is virus lover, it's his thing if he want the virus to be
delivered into his mailbox and in this case he should be noticed, that the
message contains a virus.
Will said virus lover pay for the consequences when his machine
infects the rest of the
mouss wrote on 22/07/07 18:20:
Will said virus lover pay for the consequences when his machine
infects the rest of the world? viruses are different than spam. They are
digital massive destruction weapons.
I understand the argument against delivering viruses to our users, but
they expect
Cian Davis wrote:
mouss wrote on 22/07/07 18:20:
Will said virus lover pay for the consequences when his machine
infects the rest of the world? viruses are different than spam. They are
digital massive destruction weapons.
I understand the argument against delivering viruses
Cian wrote:
As far as I know, the $defang_virus = 1 will change the body so isn't
really an option for us.
In one sense it is unchanged. The entire original message is wrapped in a MIME
container. The virus is not made safe by defanging. But in another sense you
are not getting the original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was wondering if there's an easy way of getting amavisd-new to
rewrite the subject of virus infected e-mail? I just want to add a
INFECTED tag or something. Our users scream if we bounce any mail on
them but most aren't clued in enough to
I get these warning..
WARNING: bad headers - Improper use of control character (char 0D hex):
Subject: Richiesta di Invio Schede Prodotto\r \n
I saw the amavisd.conf:
# for defanging bad headers only turn on certain minor contents
categories:
$defang_by_ccat{+CC_BADH.,3} = 1; # NUL or CR
Don Taylor
Wapiti Regional Library
306-764-0712 ex 17
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM
hallo,
i installed amavisd-new two years ago it it worked fine, now i have a new
server Suse 9.3 with sendmail 8.13.3 and amavisd-new with milter...
i want to know how to get it to work, or how to deactivate checking for
outgoing mails because i don´t need it!
i can check fine incomming mails
Hello. Not sure if this message is coming from postfix or amavisd-new. I
think it's amavisd-new
My situation; I run postfix 2.2.4, on a Debian testing system. I have
amavisd-new being called, as a content filter, in a standard
configuration (details at bottom of post). Amavisd-new version says
Gary wrote:
I don't think you have a problem as far as new features in
20030616-p10 is concerned since that version is a couple years old.
Now, if you upgrade to 2.3.3, that is a different story. If you decide
to upgrade to 2.3.3, wait for the 1:2.3.3-6 version to hit testing
because any
Peter,
I put $DO_SYSLOG = 1 and now I see a lot more logging including the
subject editing stuff. However, at the same time I added
The difference in logging verbosity between a logfile and syslogd must be
due to the way amavisd interacts with the system's syslog. I happen to be
using
Mark wrote:
Gary,
...you can set: $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** ';
if you have not already done so. In fact you may want to do this as an
alternative to setting this in SQL because the trailing space will get
trimmed from the SQL data (annoying).
Oops, annoying indeed, thanks for
from future 2.4.0 rel.notes:
- new config variable $trim_trailing_space_in_lookup_result_fields controls
trimming of trailing whitespace from SQL fields, LDAP attribute values
and associative array righthand-sides (hash values) as read by read_hash();
enabled by default for
--- Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
--- Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Should the subject line being edited be reflected in the logs then?
I just want to make sure it's being done.
At log level 5 you should see log entries like:
(55083-04)
--- Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
I put $DO_SYSLOG = 1 and now I see a lot more logging including the
subject editing stuff. However, at the same time I added
$sa_spam_modifies_subj = 1;
$sa_spam_subject_tag = '*** SPAM *** ';
to my config file so I'm not sure
Peter wrote:
Side question: Let's say a few SQL-defined users DO NOT want their mail
passed (D_PASS). How do I accomodate them?
Let's just consider spam. I think you would have to rethink the structure.
If you are passing spam to everyone right now, if it were me, I would
start by insuring
Peter wrote:
--- Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Should the subject line being edited be reflected in the logs then?
I just want to make sure it's being done.
At log level 5 you should see log entries like:
(55083-04) lookup (spam_subject_tag2) = true, ... matches,
Peter,
Should the subject line being edited be reflected in the logs then?
I just want to make sure it's being done.
At log level 5 you should see log entries like:
(55083-04) lookup (spam_subject_tag2) = true, ... matches,
result=***SPAM*** , matching_key=(constant:***SPAM*** )
...
As I implenet SA via Amavis and postfix , I'm developing my policies. I
have a domain who's mail I process and act as a gateway in front of a M$
Exchange box.
I want to quarantine spam on the server over a certain score, and deliver
the rest to the Exchange server, with the subject line tagged.
Peter,
I am using SQL lookups. I have one user (@domain.com) and one policy
defined. The field policy.spam_modifies_subj is 'Y'. I am trying not to
duplicate settings in amavisd.conf so the corresponding line is commented
out.
I am passing (D_PASS) my spam and quarantining to disk but
--- Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
I am using SQL lookups. I have one user (@domain.com) and one policy
defined. The field policy.spam_modifies_subj is 'Y'. I am trying
not to
duplicate settings in amavisd.conf so the corresponding line is
commented
out.
I am
confirm 847457
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast.
Hi Mark-
Another request for a little more logging info:
We've got these indicators for use in per-recipient logging:
%1 above tag level for this recipient: Y or 0
%2 above tag2 level for this recipient: Y or 0
%k above kill level for this recipient: Y or 0
How about one that
58 matches
Mail list logo
