Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?

2008-06-27 Thread Barber, David
Susan, I think thats a QoS setup - certain packet types/data types can be allocated more network time? I'm not really that knowledgeable on networks, but my last placement was working with a few network engineers who were working on such setups. Regards Dave -Original Message-

Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?

2008-06-27 Thread Barber, David
We have a mix - some running reports on Remedy itself, but (hopefully) the majority are working off a data warehouse running on Business Objects. The latter is of concern, as it is semi-live. It looks for deltas on the SQL Server/Remedy database. Every 5 minutes. Regards Dave

Re: Deleting Indexes in the WAT

2008-06-27 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi, No, you must recreate/delete the correct indexes manually if you have started along that path... You must make sure they have the correct permissions to allow the AR System to delete them. You can turn on SQL-logging to see exactly what AR Admin tries to do when it fails. This will guide you

Re: Recording when a user logs in...

2008-06-27 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi, I have written such a daemon, it is not hard at all. Do you need live data? Otherwise the user-log has all the information stored for you. From version 7.0 an forward, this can be done using workflow instead, by leveraging the ARDBC-plugin used in the Admin Console - Application -

Re: Recording when a user logs in...

2008-06-27 Thread Carey Matthew Black
Fran, Turn on the User log files on the ARS server. It will log all of what your asking for to a file. One word of caution. Depending on how you have your log file settings set (max size, make backup, etc..) you will likely need to use an external tool to rotate the log file regularly. (How

Re: 6.3 Web Service Input Mapping Order

2008-06-27 Thread Carey Matthew Black
Robert, Ref: http://www.xmlschemareference.com/sequenceElement.html The sequence element provides an XML representation of an ordered set of element types. For each element type associated with a sequence element in an XML schema document, there must be a corresponding element in the

Quick Action Bug!

2008-06-27 Thread Arnab Baral
Hi List, In ITSM Incident Management console we have a table field that shows all the tickets for all the group the user is assigned to. Whenever we select one incident to assign it to a group member using the Quick Action button another selection is happening automatically in the table. Now

Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?

2008-06-27 Thread Dave Saville
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:06:25 -0600, Dave Wilmot wrote: Dave, Your systems administrator(s) should easily be able to isolate the network as the problem (or not) by running one or more utilities which will check network round-trip times. One such tool might be the Solaris (Sun Unix) ping -sRv

Re: Quick Action Bug!

2008-06-27 Thread T. Dee
What version / patch level of ITSM 7 are you running? Ty On 6/27/08, Arnab Baral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hi List, In ITSM Incident Management console we have a table field that shows all the tickets for all the group the user is assigned to. Whenever we select one incident to assign

arInvokeGuide example

2008-06-27 Thread huntmon
ARS 7.1.0 P3, Solaris, Windows User Tools From a view field we want to capture the event that the agent clicked on a link in the view field's browser window using the windows user tool. Does anyone have quick example. I am a little new to web development. Thanks -- View this message in context:

Re: Quick Action Bug!

2008-06-27 Thread Arnab Baral
Hi, The ITSM version is 7.1.00 and patch no is 2. Regards Arnab On 6/27/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What version / patch level of ITSM 7 are you running? Ty On 6/27/08, Arnab Baral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hi List, In ITSM Incident Management console we have a table

Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?

2008-06-27 Thread Axton
Dave, Unless you have a network that supports jumbo frames, all the data sent over the network gets broken into 1500 or less bytes per packet. There is no reason to use packets bigger than 1500 bytes unless you want to test fragmentation/defragmentation at each of the end points. For measuring

Calculating Time

2008-06-27 Thread Abdul Baytops
Hello Listers I know its Friday but I have a question regarding calculating the time in a Remedy Form. I have 2 Date/Time fields on a form in which I need to figure out how to determine the time difference from Field A Field B in total time but the format I need the result in is hours and

Re: Quick Action Bug!

2008-06-27 Thread T. Dee
I'm running 7.0.03 patch 007 and I tried what you said - it seems to work. Sounds like a defect. On 6/27/08, Arnab Baral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hi, The ITSM version is 7.1.00 and patch no is 2. Regards Arnab On 6/27/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What version / patch

Re: Calculating Time

2008-06-27 Thread Axton
b - a = c c is seconds c mod 60 = seconds c / 60 = minutes with a remainder in seconds c / 3600 = hours with a remainder in seconds drop the remainder for minutes and hours, then you can create a string with the format of hours:minutes:seconds Axton Grams On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:18 AM,

Re: Calculating Time

2008-06-27 Thread Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
Create three hidden fields -- one for hours, one for minutes, and one for total number of seconds Subtracting the two times yields a total number of seconds. Put that value in the seconds field. Divide that value by 3600. That gives you total hours with a decimal. Use the INT function to strip

Re: Calculating Time

2008-06-27 Thread LJ Longwing
And if they are in fact date/time fields...and you have the possibility of more than 24 hours...you might want to add another for 'days'...and limit hours to 23...:) -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton Sent:

Re: Quick Action Bug!

2008-06-27 Thread Arnab Baral
yeah that is what my concern is Regards Arnab On 6/27/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running 7.0.03 patch 007 and I tried what you said - it seems to work. Sounds like a defect. On 6/27/08, Arnab Baral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hi, The ITSM version is 7.1.00 and

Re: Quick Action Bug!

2008-06-27 Thread T. Dee
Did you ask Remedy to confirm your findings? On 6/27/08, Arnab Baral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** yeah that is what my concern is Regards Arnab On 6/27/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running 7.0.03 patch 007 and I tried what you said - it seems to work. Sounds like a

Re: Recording when a user logs in...

2008-06-27 Thread F Lawson
Thank you, Misi and everybody who replied. I really appreciate your assistance! I'll try this first and a daemon if this doesn't work. Fran On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Misi Mladoniczky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have written such a daemon, it is not hard at all. Do you need

Re: Remedy and Multiple CPUs

2008-06-27 Thread Axton
The only knobs you have are the queue/thread settings in the server information. There are some things introduced in 7.1 to help with this as well: multi-threaded escalation engine. Axton Grams On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Benjamin Trimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Is there a setting

Re: Calculating Time

2008-06-27 Thread Abdul Baytops
Is this using the SUBSTR function in my active link as well... Abdul Baytops -Director of Business Operations Digital Foundation Corporation Office: 301-283-3410 Mobile: 240-346-4628 Web: www.thedigitalcorp.com -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

Re: 6.3 Web Service Input Mapping Order

2008-06-27 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
The XML Definition of Sequence is an ordered list of attributes so the field order is required to be in the exact same order as they are defined. Fred From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Halstead

OT:Friday Humor

2008-06-27 Thread Kevin Gallagher
When things in your life seem almost too much to handle, when 24 hours in a day is not enough, remember the mayonnaise jar and the 2 Beers. A professor stood before his philosophy class and had some items in front of him. When the class began, he wordlessly picked up a very large and empty

Re: Calculating Time

2008-06-27 Thread Gidd
Abdul, Perhaps a look at one of the educational viewlets here will help? http://www.buoyantsolutions.net/ARS_Education.html Take a look at the one about calculating time (Manipulating Dates). Hope this helps. Regards...Gidd -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion

Re: Recording when a user logs in...

2008-06-27 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
A user Logging in thru the User Tool is easy. You can leverage the Init-Form capabilities to determine when a user log's in From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of F Lawson Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:24 AM

Re: Recording when a user logs in...

2008-06-27 Thread T. Dee
I did that exact same thing - it works good as the init-form opens in the background without the user knowing and we had it grab their login id, date logged in, etc. On 6/27/08, Grooms, Frederick W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** A user Logging in thru the User Tool is easy. You can leverage the

Re: Recording when a user logs in...

2008-06-27 Thread Matt Reinfeldt
However, if you want to leverage the same tracking on the MT... :) I created a copy of the default 'Home' page, added some hidden, global fields, and workflow to push the data I wanted to a helper form, then set my custom 'home page' as the default. Worked fine for me, both UT and MT. Just an

Re: 6.3 Web Service Input Mapping Order

2008-06-27 Thread Robert Halstead
Thanks Carey =) you are the man! I looked at the the schema last night and correlated the tags using w3schools.com and realized that as well. Looks like we either have the option of choice or sequence where choice only selects one field out of the bunch declared within. Looks like we're stuck

WorkflowGen/AR System

2008-06-27 Thread Shellman, David
Anyone have any experience with WorkflowGen as an approval system and if so any interaction with the AR System? Thanks, Dave Dave Shellman Phone: (717) 810-3687 Fax:(717) 810-2124 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tyco Electronics MS 161-043 PO Box 3608 Harrisburg, PA 17105-3607

Change Status of Multiple People Records

2008-06-27 Thread versicle
I have about 300 People records that I need to change the status of to Delete. I've tried running an escalation but apparently ARESCALATOR doesn't have the correct permissions to modify that field. Any suggestions? -- View this message in context:

Re: Change Status of Multiple People Records

2008-06-27 Thread Brian Gillock
Try a search and Modify All. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of versicle Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:11 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Change Status of Multiple People Records I have about 300 People

Re: Change Status of Multiple People Records

2008-06-27 Thread T. Dee
What error are you getting? What escalation are you running? On 6/27/08, versicle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have about 300 People records that I need to change the status of to Delete. I've tried running an escalation but apparently ARESCALATOR doesn't have the correct permissions to modify

Re: Change Status of Multiple People Records

2008-06-27 Thread T. Dee
By the way escalations run on the server - there are no permissions. On 6/27/08, versicle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have about 300 People records that I need to change the status of to Delete. I've tried running an escalation but apparently ARESCALATOR doesn't have the correct permissions

Adding additional AIE instances of the Integration Engine service

2008-06-27 Thread Remedy
I just started working on a new contract where they are using ARSystem 7.1.00 Patch 002 with AIE 7.1.00 Patch 002 and CMDB 2.0.1 patch 004. The Remedy server currently has about 12 CPU's, and the group that installed AIE only setup two instances of the Integration Engine service. We would like

Re: Change Status of Multiple People Records

2008-06-27 Thread J.T. Shyman
There is workflow on the CTM:People form to prevent certain users from making certain changes. I think this is the filter that is causing the issue for you: CTM:PPL:GetStatusRuleSet_030 You can make a copy of it, disable the original and add OR $USER$ = 'AR_ESCALATOR' to the end of the Run If and

Re: OT:Friday Humor

2008-06-27 Thread Rick Cook
Now THAT's some good Friday Humor, Tim!! LOL! Rick On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Tim Widowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Man, just think how much more beer would fit in the jar if you didn't have all that nasty, worthless debris in there! --Tim - Original Message From:

CMDB Duplication issues on a large scale

2008-06-27 Thread Remedy
I have just started a new contract with a client that is running ARSystem/AIE 7.1.00 Patch 002 and CMDB 2.0.1 patch 004. They are receiving discovery data from a number of sources (including Marimba) which are being brought into the system via EIE/AIE and then Reconciled into the CMDB. The short

St-Pierre Patrick I625ST/Levis/GVDL est absent(e).

2008-06-27 Thread Patrick St-Pierre
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 2008-06-27 de retour le 2008-07-02. ___ Le présent message est destiné uniquement aux personnes indiquées dans l'en-tête. Il contient des informations confidentielles qui ne peuvent être divulguées à des tiers sans que l'expéditeur ait

Re: Change Status of Multiple People Records

2008-06-27 Thread Michael Ziniti
Thank guys. The Modify All worked. For some reason I was under the impression you couldn't do a Modify All for People records. Michael Ziniti DCO - ITAM San Francisco Direct: 925-974-5273 Cell: 516-729-8150 AIM: MikePZiniti -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion

Re: CMDB Duplication issues on a large scale

2008-06-27 Thread Rick Cook
Brent, There is the Reconciliation Engine, which might be an option, though that only cleans the data you have. If your feeds are the problem, RE might not be able to fix that completely. It will also take some time to configure properly to do what you want, too, if it's even possible. I would

RESOLVED - Re: Request ID In Process .. again, SQL Error

2008-06-27 Thread Mauricio M.
Leonard, I traced the error in the SQL log and I found the offending INSERT operation, then I got to compare two INSERTs, one with a failing result and one with a successful result, and I found that the error was in the Mail Station field (id 100036) in HPD:IncidentInterface_Create form, this