Tyler,
2.6 onwards do not require a recompilation if you use the conda package.
All the binaries are included.
//Richard
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024, 10:25 Summers, Tyler (GSFC-613.0)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND
APPLICATIONS INC] wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Regarding the new ARTS 2.6.2 release; I have
re cannot be numbers such as 2/1, 1,
> etc.
>
> Do I have any other options?
>
>
> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jiaan He
>
>
>
> At 2023-12-07 13:16:42, "Richard Larsson" wrote:
>
> Hi Jiaan,
>
> qns
Hi Jiaan,
qns' and qns'' contain HITRAN quantum numbers (mostly based on VAMDC).
There is some quantum number definition in the pure 150-char par-line, but
we do not parse it as it is generally not possible with the information
available (the paper-published format doesn't always agree with what
Dear Shaofei,
No.
If you are only in the upper atmosphere, you need to use line-by-line when
considering the Zeeman Effect.
The full models fail there anyways because they don't consider Doppler
effects or Zeeman effects.
If your beam leaves the upper atmosphere, you need to do additional
ichard, but when I choose "create
> new output format" I do not see e.g. the ".par line" tag and the "qns' "
> tag. I only find a window where I can select available parameters to be
> written into the .par file.
>
> Best regards,
> Claudia
>
>
&g
Dear Mattia,
What version are you running? We found a memory leak in 2.5.6 that we
fixed in 2.5.8. Just do "pyarts.version" in a python interpreter to see
your version string.
//Richard
Den mån 9 jan. 2023 kl 15:12 skrev Mattia Sabatini <
mattia.sabat...@artov.ismar.cnr.it>:
> Dear all,
>
>
Dear Renish,
This is not a real problem. What it says is that we have no way to print a
SingleScatteringData type to screen. You have a working
SingleScatteringData. We realize that this is confusing so in the future
the __repr__ function you are calling (by just typing the .value in your
Hi Ryosuke,
I am not familiar with the arts-lecture package in general, but this issue
is because you lack the arts-xml-data folder in your path. The
arts-xml-data can be downloaded using subversion or as a zip from:
https://www.radiativetransfer.org/tools/
You then need to set a system
Dear Witali,
You can use my calculations for line mixing. They are still not published
but available online in the arts-cat-data. They have the disadvantage that
they are not published but the advantage that they are self-consistent.
You can download this data at
Dear Eric,
The QI is not available for the data you are looking at.
It stands for QuantumIdentifier, which is the class in Arts that deals with
quantum numbers and gas species for the purpose of identifying a unique
absorption line. In 2.4, you define this as something like "O3-666 TR UP J
1 LO
r.le...@uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mattia, hi Pengwang,
> > >
> > > Thanks Mattia for helping out. :-)
> > >
> > > Since you were referring to Richard's earlier post, I'll take this
> opportunity to point out the searchable archive o
Dear Pengwang,
You should be able to read a Hitran file in 2.4 that you could read in
2.3. Now, it sounds like you have downloaded a new version of the Hitran
catalog. Arts 2.4 does not directly support Hitran2020, neither did 2.3 to
be clear. For water, I still think this should still be Ok
Dear Mattia,
It looks like you are removing line calculations from your lookup
calculations.
Could you try adding abs_xsec_per_speciesAddLines to your lookup
cross-section agenda? I think this will solve the problem.
We are currently in a transition in the 2.5-branch of moving away from
Hi,
Just by numbers:
RJBT at 300 K 183 GHz is 3.086705214957283e-15
Planck at 300 K 183 GHz is 3.0417434132511342e-15
This means you expect a 1.5 % difference, or about 4.5 K between them.
With hope,
//Richard
Den tis 20 apr. 2021 kl 13:22 skrev Thomas,Renish <
renish.tho...@colostate.edu>:
Hi,
This is my fault. Explanation if wanted: sensor_time is now a different
type. It now stores actual time stamps like "1970-01-01 01:00:01" (which
is what "1" means in time stamps if you are in CET).
I will fix it so you can set the time from a numpy array again in pyarts.
However, I don't
Hi Witali,
The line mixing does not matter yet.
OK, not 0/0 but you simply are not having any quantum numbers at all (these
are the the missing numbers)
The nan numbers will matter later. You will see another error if you
fix the first problem. I would suggest you just keep lines with v1=0
Hi Witali,
The error means that your lines' quantum numbers are defined in a way the
ARTS Zeeman module cannot understand (we need F or J to do these
computations). If you print the line catalog, you will probably see
several "0/0" in there for the lines you have defined as using Zeeman
effect.
Hi Witali,
The functions in the README require 2 inputs. You need to give them
an ArrayOfQuantumIdentifier, qid, and a Vector, gs. The
xml-data/spec/zeeman/ contains these files. Load O2-66.g.xml into a
Vector. Load O2-66.qid.xml into an ArrayOfQuantumIdentifier. You now call
either of the
Hi Reno,
A quick glance at your building procedure. It seems like you are pointing
against a very old version of arts-xml-data. Can you confirm that it is
the latest arts-xml-data from the dev-branch that you have got there?
Because the files should be there in the development branch. Also, I
Hi again Rita,
The ARTS approach to all this comes from the idealistic view of a computer
model as a simple linear algebra system,
J · x = y,
where J is 'the model', or the Jacobian matrix, x is the model input, i.e.,
O3, and y is the model output, i.e., the simulated radiation. From this,
the
Hi Jana,
Den ons 3 apr. 2019 kl 17:08 skrev Jana Mendrok :
> Hi,
>
> thanks Richard for your feedback. I'm not sure, though, whether I really
> understand it (incl. wondering why you talk about jacobians here...).
> *scratches head*
>
I might have misunderstood the question slightly, but the
Hi Rita,
For the directional components, the sign of a retrieved component with the
ARTS Jacobian is positive along the axes themselves. The direction the
sensor is looking only influences the scale of the Jacobian, not the sign
of the direction of the retrieval calculation. If you look
Hi Stuart,
A development model problem. I am not sure this will solve your issues
completely, but can you try adding SurfaceDummy at the start of your
iy_surface_agenda?
The new variables you are seeing are part of a method Patrick is working on
for calculating the Jacobian of surface features.
p; Technology
>
> 30 Songdomirae-ro D-1510, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21990, South Korea
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* "Richard Larsson"
> *To:* "이병석";
> *Cc:* "Simon Pfreundschuh"; <
> arts_users...@mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de>;
> *S
Hi,
Just as a warning, suppressing the bad partition function error is not good
practice since it is known that they are, you know, bad. Standard tests in
ARTS fail by several tenths of Kelvin because the partition functions in
ARTS are that bad. Just run with the provided tips xml-files
Dear Pengwang Zhai,
I think we still have what you are looking for in ARTS.
The variable you are actually interested in is not abs_coef, but
abs_coef_per_species.
The way to create this is to first run abs_xsec_agenda and
then abs_coefCalcFromXsec.
I think your code should only change from:
26 matches
Mail list logo
