Referring to Chris's comment -...extensively commented assembler programs
...- I'm all in favour of well commented code - I believe 'good
comments' should be mandatory. But what is a 'good comment'? Who hasn't
seen something like:
MVCC89FLA,C60MGT move C60MGT to C89FLA
or even (shock
I have raised a requirement on HLASM to see what they can do to
improve/change the behavior raised in this thread.
You can find the RFE at
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfeCR_ID=22828
Please add your comments to the RFE.
Sharuff
Sharuff Morsa - IBM Hursley Labs
Paul wrote
Hello, MHVRCFS
(I can find no email contact information in this publication.
This has worked for other publications. Will it work for this?)
In:
Title: V1R6 Language Ref
Document Number: SC26-4940-05
The last few pages of the manual (
This is an interesting discussion with lots of useful information and code
snippets. The Request For Enhancement has been submitted to the HLASM
team at IBM. Please use this URL
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfeCR_ID=22828
to add your cements to the request. The RFE
John wrote:
Date:Mon, 4 Jun 2012 21:16:35 -0400
From:John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Opinions? Syntax enhancement to numeric literals.
I have taxed other people with not having mastered details, but I must
admit that I did not know that
| DCF'2
This is a good idea - I've raised an RFE:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfeCR_ID=23635
If you also believe this is useful, please add comment/votes to the RFE
entry
Sharuff
Sharuff Morsa - IBM Hursley
IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
I should also say:
Ed make a useful suggestion - make some of these items Share requests.
Also, John and I will be in San Francisco at the spring Share conference.
We (am taking a liberty here - I've not asked John, but I'm sure the
answer is yes) can sort out a conference room to discuss ADATA
Sequence numbers is one of those topics where opinions divide. HLASM -
written in HLASM, has had their sequence numbers stripped and stored in
UTF8 on a Jazz server. We use RTC and Jazz for HLASM. Its an integrated
system - source control and project management, all together in RTC. Not
only
Ed,
I think a SHARE requirement would be a useful start to discussing
additional extended mnemonics. I'd follow that up with a HLASM RFE
request.
How do we start the SHARE requirement ? and would you expect to discuss
this at Boston or before ?
Sharuff
Sharuff Morsa
HLASM IBM Hursley
Unless
Scott mentions customers and 24-bit and yestedrday Paul Gilmartin mention
'during the transition from 370 to XA'
and...
I'm interested about what assembler code 'out there' (zOS,zVM or zVSE)
still contained (probably as dual code path?) XA or 370 or 390 only code
path/instructions - and why. I
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Subject: PDSE and HLASM together in z/OS 2.1
...
After a PMR it turned out that the PDSE has not enough storage.
We are using the default assembler OPTION SIZE(MAX) . In this case ,
according the book , the assembler gives back 128 K byte storage, but it
is not big enough
be a little less.
On 27.02.2014 13:38, Sharuff Morsa3 wrote:
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Gil
If you (or anyone on the list) would like to see the PTF level in a GBLC
symbol, or indeed, any other useful piece of information in a system GBLC,
simply raise a requirement (go read
http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21577670 on how to do raise
one).
And as Jonathan mentioned,
I work regularly with Steve. It is, and has been, a please and a delight.
I've always respected his views, many of which I agree with.
Sharuff
smo...@uk.ibm.com
Date:Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:35:36 -0400
From:Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com
Subject: Re: Macros -- was: EDit mask for
USING ought to be as helpful as possible.
HLASM - like other products can be driven by user requests. The more
requests/votes we have - the higher up the list the requirement goes.
If the community feels this change is important/useful/desirable
then please raise a requirement and vote for it.
Ain't progress wonderful?
Anyone know how to stop it ? (progress that is)
I would not rule out 8 character mnemonics nor 8 character HLASM
assembler directives (not that I'm currently planning any).
Because of the very large number of mnemonics and extended mnemonics which
have been
Joe
If you specify (or default to) NOADATA, the file is not opened
and
the book HLASM V1R6 Programmer's Guide - Table 24. Invoking the assembler
dynamically) says:
ddnamelist
Specifies the address of a variable-length list containing alternative
ddnames for the data sets
used during assembler
The closet instruction is HLASM has for what Gil asked is CNOP - updated a
couple of years ago by apar PI17455 - but you do need to know what your
cache lines are.
see http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PI17455
and http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21687009
Where the
Your listing confused me. At the latest HLASM version (UI42852) I get:
LocObject Code Addr1Addr2Stmt Source Statement
1 * from ASSEMBLER-LIST
24/11/2016
0032 2 PREXRL RSECT
.. am I the only one who is beginning to feel that 'random quest' needs
its own forum ?
Sharuff
IBM Mainframe Assembler List wrote on
18/05/2017 15:35:57:
> From: Paul Gilmartin <0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu>
> To:
20 matches
Mail list logo