I find users saying "can you check the logs for an email from XYZ from last
Monday or Tuesday?"
It would be helpful if I could see the day of the week next to the dates
that are displayed when you click the question mark that lists maillog
numbers and their dates. If it's not a big deal, could yo
> 1.2.3.4 # added by Global-Penalty-Box Server - [possibly a
> comment] - 2020-08-08 12:48:12
>
> the next release will have it
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:"K Post"
> An:"ASSP development mailing list" <
> a
1.2.3.4 # added by Global-Penalty-Box Server - [possibly a
comment] - 2020-08-08 12:48:12
the next release will have it
Thomas
Von:"K Post"
An: "ASSP development mailing list"
Datum: 29.10.2020 13:17
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Feature request - adding I
checking in on this. Any thoughts?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:58 PM K Post wrote:
> If it's not too difficult to implement, would it be possible when adding
> an IP to blocklists to automatically add the date it was added and possibly
> a space for a note to be added?
>
> For example if I add an
If it's not too difficult to implement, would it be possible when adding an
IP to blocklists to automatically add the date it was added and possibly a
space for a note to be added?
For example if I add an IP to a list from /ipaction I get
1.2.3.4 # added by GUI Action - - via MaillogTail
I
Without doubt the biggest management headache I have with ASSP is the
SSL/TLS DDoS feature.
When SSL fails, for whatever reason:
Aug-14-19 14:48:09 [Worker_2] Error: Worker_2 accept_SSL to client
111.222.333.444 failed IO::Socket::SSL=GLOB(0x1089bb828) (timeout: 5 s)
: SSL accept attempt failed b
.1:5/maillog?wrap=2&color=1&tailbyte=1&search=[spam+
> found]&order=0&nocontext=1&nohighlight=1&size=2&files=
> files&limit=100#MlTop
>
> to prevent the login popup, define the user:passord in the URL - o
l think about this feature request.
Thomas
Von:K Post
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 17.02.2017 20:36
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Feature request: Daily report of error
reports
And while I'm at it, I'll request this too:
Add an option to show messages marked with
And while I'm at it, I'll request this too:
Add an option to show messages marked with the Spam prefix - messages that
are probably spam but fell below the threshold - to the blockreport (noted
as not needing to be resent if not spam)
Again, something like this would help an admin improve ASSP acc
I find the nightly report that I get of all blocked mail to be
*incredibly* helpful.
I use it to resend mail and see how the server's doing in general.
Would it be possible to have a similar report sent to the admin of error
reports (mail sent to the EmailSpam and EmailNotSpam addresses)? That
wo
rintable characters per default!
Thomas
Von:Gooegg
An: 'ASSP development mailing list'
Datum: 22.09.2016 17:19
Betreff: [Assp-test] Feature request
Hi all,
I would like to know if it could be possible to have and separate Msg/IP
scorring for messages with non
+1
__.https://eXtremeSHOK.com
.__
On 22-Sep-16 4:59 PM, Gooegg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know if it could be possible to have and separate Msg/IP
> scorring for messages with non printable characters in
> undecod
Hi all,
I would like to know if it could be possible to have and separate Msg/IP
scorring for messages with non printable characters in
undecoded subject (RFC2047) or have a way to disable just that that check?
I'am asking this because I have a rather large user base
of mostly french speaking p
hoice to query DNS.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:"Daniel L. Miller"
> An: ASSP development mailing list
> Datum: 26.08.2014 22:26
> Betreff:[Assp-test] Feature request - IP address update from
> domain
>
>
>
> Anyone else experi
se DNS to find MX records for address/domain and remove
from any Black/Blocklists
Use the OS tools or any tool/webpage of your choice to query DNS.
Thomas
Von:"Daniel L. Miller"
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 26.08.2014 22:26
Betreff: [Assp-test] Feat
Anyone else experienced this? Current operation:
1. A customer/vendor tries to send me an email - ASSP blocks it for
what would otherwise be good reason.
2. Badly configured remote immediately tries to resend multiple times -
ASSP places in Penalty Blacklist.
3. Office staff complain unable
The auto-whitelist solves almost all my needs. Almost.
The penalty blacklisting works wonders at killing all kinds of
misbehaving spammers - but sometimes I'll have a bonehead remote sender
trying to send us something, and when they get rejected they just keep
sending until they're on the vari
How about diffrent SpamError just for DoNoSpoofing? One could explain
how to get yourself into noSpoofingCheckDomain while not confusing
normal false-positive spam sender (which gets SpamError)
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere,
For virus file scan there are two possible returns "good" and "bad."
I am implementing Adobe's malware classifier with ASSP which returns 0 = CLEAN,
1 = DIRTY, or UNKNOWN.
I would like 1) to add a "maybe" and 2 have someone tell me how "good" and
"bad" gets scored.
I will be happy to repor
Hi Colin
Thanks for the tip will look at this ASAP.
/Anders
From: Colin
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 2012-09-10 15:10
Subject:Re: [Assp-test] Feature request.
Have a look at the following options:
uniqeIDLogging
uniqueIDPrefix
Should do what you are asking
Have a look at the following options:
uniqeIDLogging
uniqueIDPrefix
Should do what you are asking for already.
All the best,
Colin Waring.
On 10/09/2012 13:59, Anders Westin wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> Is it possible to get a some sort of session id in the log, that follows
> from connection to disc
Hi Thomas
Is it possible to get a some sort of session id in the log, that follows
from connection to disconnection and it must be unique?
it would be great to have when you tracking messages in the log and maybe
the id should added in the mail header.
something like this (sampleid can be anyt
My apologies for any typos - doing this from my phone.
I just had an instance where my office was complaining about blocked senders
while I was out. I tried to remotely access assp via my phone & vpn, but
couldn't get the page to load.
Falling back to ssh, I found in the log that aol had been
At this time, unless I misunderstand, the statistics shown under
"Message Statistics" are for messages that are specifically blocked by
each category. So those tests that are specifically set to "block" will
show in these counters. However, all tests that are set to "score" have
no representa
On 2012-07-27 1:37 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> On 7/25/2012 10:54 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Ok, well...
>>
>> Can you point me to documentation that explains how to setup ASSP such
>> that it totally bypasses/disables all of the 'SMTP Proxy' functionality,
>> so that it works only as a post-q
On 7/25/2012 10:54 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Ok, well...
>
> Can you point me to documentation that explains how to setup ASSP such
> that it totally bypasses/disables all of the 'SMTP Proxy' functionality,
> so that it works only as a post-queue Content Filter?
>
Did my last ASSP list-post prov
On 7/25/2012 10:54 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-07-25 1:33 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> ASSP development mailing list schrei
>> bt:
>>> Could you (or Thomas) at least comment on the possibility/viability
>>> of splitting ASSP's functionality into pre and post processing 'modes'
>>> or 'mo
On 7/25/2012 9:38 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-07-25 11:23 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> ASSP 1.9 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
> Understood, and thanks, but I would need full/solid SSL/TLS support, so
> v1 is no longer an option for me.
>
>> ASSP 2 is rocksolid and can be used pre
Absolutely
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
ASSP 1.9 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
ASSP 2 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive li
ASSP development mailing list schrei
bt:
>
>Can you point me to documentation that explains how to setup ASSP such
>
>that it totally bypasses/disables all of the 'SMTP Proxy' functionalit
>y,
>so that it works only as a post-queue Content Filter?
Use listenPort for input from from (pre) queue
On 2012-07-25 1:33 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> Could you (or Thomas) at least comment on the possibility/viability
>> of splitting ASSP's functionality into pre and post processing 'modes'
>> or 'modules' (for lack of a better term), so that we would
ASSP development mailing list schrei
bt:
>
>Could you (or Thomas) at least comment on the possibility/viability of
>
>splitting ASSP's functionality into pre and post processing 'modes' or
>
>'modules' (for lack of a better term), so that we would have the optio
>n
>of only implementing the conte
On 2012-07-25 12:46 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> That said - and again, *please* do not take offense - but
>> complaints about new versions of v2 locking up/freezing/etc abound
>> on the assp-test list,
> There is a production version of ASSP V2 and
ASSP development mailing list schrei
bt:
>That said - and again, *please* do not take offense - but complaints
>about new versions of v2 locking up/freezing/etc abound on the assp-te
>st
>list,
There is a production version of ASSP V2 and a development version. Us
e the production version an
On 2012-07-25 11:23 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP 1.9 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
Understood, and thanks, but I would need full/solid SSL/TLS support, so
v1 is no longer an option for me.
> ASSP 2 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
Well, I know a lot of mail admins who are p
ASSP 1.9 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
ASSP 2 is rocksolid and can be used pre/post.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has cha
Hello,
I'm just seeing if this is something that the devs would even consider...
I love ASSP, but I had to stop using it a long time ago (when the new v2
development took off thanks to Thomas joining the project) because for
our needs, it was just a much too fast moving target, and more
import
Fritz,
Thank you! Will update asap.
Barry
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2012 16:48
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-test] Feature request v1.9.3.2
There is new dev version here:
http
There is new dev version here:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/assp/ASSP%20Installation/Auto
Update/ASSP1dev/assp.pl.gz
with
- Hide IP in 'Received:' header (HideIP)
If set, ASSP will hide the IP and HELO in the 'Received:' header for l
ocal connections
--
Perhaps that should be a beter solution: all valid senders/clients will be
touched/changed then.
Thanks,
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: woensdag 4 april 2012 16:15
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature request
ASSP development mailing list schrei
bt:
>
>The changed code checks if the connecting IP exists in acceptAllMail a
>nd,
>when matched, inserts the fake ip 127.0.0.1 and hostname internal. Whe
>n not
>match: nothing changes.
Should tis only be done for IPs in acceptAllMail or for all local co
Hi Fritz,
First of all thank you for doing such great work!
I've got a feature request for the 1.x ASSP versions.
When sending an e-mail from the local network to an external address, my
clients connect to the ASSP server directly.
This connection is registered as a received-hop in the message h
I would like an option to, for every url processed with URIBL's, convert the
host name to IP and then query the DNSBL's.
Tom
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or v
Hello,
I would like to have a function in ASSP to get a list of all entires
of the SBcache (or the new entries from the last x days), which are not
already added to the SB-Whitelist and have a button or link there to move
them to the Whitelist.
actually, from time to time, I look into the
From the mail log view, make mail & server addresses appear as links
which when clicked give options for adding/removing from white/redlist.
--
Daniel
--
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This pap
> -Original Message-
> From: Hill, Brett [mailto:hil...@nlbusa.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 9:26 AM
> To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Assp-test] Feature Request 1.8.x (hopefully a simple one)
>
> Can you add a button to the ASSP interface
Can you add a button to the ASSP interface to manually force an
auto-update (a way to manually start the auto-update process)? It would
remove a lot of steps for checking for a more recent version than what
was already downloaded.
I don't see anything like this in the current 1.8.5.3 version y
One way to cope with locally modified versions of files that originate
in the ASSP source repository is to actually have 2 files for all the
file: files read by ASSP.
The original file could be read as file:data/BombExpression.txt and the
local as file:data/BombExpression.local.txt or similar f
On 10/10/2010 12:32 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> A real good implementation of an autoupdate of the support files is very
> difficult, because we need a line versioning not only a file versioning.
> This feature is still in conceptionel development.
>
> To get notified about changed files in the '
, I recommend to use the 'feed', 'monitor' and 'watch' features inside
the sourgeforge 'assp' project.
Thomas
Von:"Daniel L. Miller"
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 10.10.2010 06:50
Betreff:[Assp-test] Feature R
Auto-update currently updates assp.pl and rebuildspamdb.pl - but
nothing else (as far as I know). Can support be added for updating the
support files - such as the recent preheaderre.txt file which did not
exist in previous versions.
Options could include downloading missing files (such as t
Perhaps utilizing Captcha. Options including, whitelist as usual, or whitelist
for X amount of time. Require whitelist requester to specify recipient email
address(which would be verified via validate recipient methods). Option to
send notification to recipient with any instructions, such as
pass the
> message, if the last spam detection flag does not belong to the Bayes
> check - for example 'messagescore'. This will be changed in 2.0.2_1.1.14.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:Paul Schutte
> An: ASSP development mailing list
&
'messagescore'. This will be changed in 2.0.2_1.1.14.
Thomas
Von:Paul Schutte
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 29.06.2010 17:05
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Feature request
Hi.
I see messages in the maillog.txt that looks like this:
2010-06-29 16:52:07 23121-1
While I am on a roll...
Another suggestion is to maybe give bonus points to messages that are
classed as "confident.ham" ?
We then would have finer grained control over what happen to bayesian
spams:
confident.ham => gets (adjustable) bonus score to help them over some
hurdles.
doubtful.ham => h
Hi.
I see messages in the maillog.txt that looks like this:
2010-06-29 16:52:07 23121-19670 [Worker_15]
[MessageLimit][lowconfidence] 67.195.8.63 to:
patr...@it.up.ac.za [spam found] and possibly passing because of low
confidence, otherwise blocked (MessageScore 89, limit 80) [Thank you for
using
Hello again.
Fritz, thank you for your advice about the (switchTestToScoring)
setting.
However, I stil see messages above (PenaltyMessageLimit) being delivered
to the users. These messages are tagged as spam (score 40-80 should be
tagged). Messages with scores above 80 should be blocked. I would
On 2010-06-25 4:53 AM, GrayHat wrote:
> exactly my point; it doesn't make sense imHo allowing users to
> change their passwords w/o checking them and then reject the
> emails due to "weak passwords"; the password issue must be
> dealt with at mailserver level
I don't think Matti meant that these s
>> ASSP is much more then a spamfilter (as you should know).
>> It provides Mail Routing, SSL, Virusscanning, connection
>> shaping and lots more usefull functions.
> Surely the testing for weak passwords should be done at the
> point that the password is changed - not somewhere else later
>
On 24/06/10 15:44, Matti Haack wrote:
> ASSP is much more then a spamfilter (as you should know). It provides
> Mail Routing, SSL, Virusscanning, connection shaping and lots more usefull
> functions.
>
Surely the testing for weak passwords should be done at the point that
the password is chan
Hello Greyhat,
there is no way in the API to access Hmailserver passwords - and
hmailserver only stores hashes in it's DB.
Of course, it would be easy to change the Admin Script. But so we
would have a solution covering any MTA. On My system I never had an
issue with weak passwords
> BTW Greyhat, could you be so kind and tell me wich
> application can test for weak passwords in connection
> with hmailserver? It seems as you have great experience
> with some appliances who would manage this.
I think you'll have to look at the hMailServer "scripting"
the program expos
ASSP is much more then a spamfilter (as you should know). It provides
Mail Routing, SSL, Virusscanning, connection shaping and lots more usefull
functions.
On my machine, toasting coffe and cleaning up the room runs fine :)
But it would be great if it also checks for weak passwords.
I think thi
> Weak Passwords are in the top 10 reasons for relaying spam. So I fell
> this could be part of ASSP
No, sorry, assp is a SPAMFILTER not a way to allow brain-dead
admins to plug some kind of "silver bullet" on their network and
feel better just because "they installed something"; if you want
or n
Weak Passwords are in the top 10 reasons for relaying spam. So I fell
this could be part of ASSP
Matti
>>> Good idea, but why not just use cracklib or something that is already
>>> designed and well tested for something like this:
>>
>>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Cracklib/Cracklib.pm
>>
>> Good idea, but why not just use cracklib or something that is already
>> designed and well tested for something like this:
>
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Cracklib/Cracklib.pm
> This would be helpful too.
Nope; I don't think so, see... ASSP is a *spamfilter* not some kind
of "universal
Hello Thomas,
> I still not understand, what this should be for!? The SMTP password (used
> in the AUTH command) are stored and checked at the MTA - why should assp
> check its weakness, if the MTA should do this at the time when it is
> specfied?
You are right. But many MTAs have no option t
eff: [Assp-test] Feature request: Weak Password Warning
Hello,
would it be possible to check incomming SMTP Passwords against a list
of regexes and send a warning to the logfile if matching?
Additionatly it would be good to check the PW not to be the user part
or a substring of the userpart of
On 2010-06-24 6:31 AM, Matti Haack wrote:
>> Good idea, but why not just use cracklib or something that is already
>> designed and well tested for something like this:
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Cracklib/Cracklib.pm
> This would be helpful too.
> But I think ASSP already includes lot
> Good idea, but why not just use cracklib or something that is already
> designed and well tested for something like this:
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Cracklib/Cracklib.pm
This would be helpful too.
But I think ASSP already includes lot of code to check regexes, so a
simple regex text
On 2010-06-24 6:08 AM, Matti Haack wrote:
> would it be possible to check incomming SMTP Passwords against a list
> of regexes and send a warning to the logfile if matching?
>
> Additionatly it would be good to check the PW not to be the user part
> or a substring of the userpart of the email ad
Hello,
would it be possible to check incomming SMTP Passwords against a list
of regexes and send a warning to the logfile if matching?
Additionatly it would be good to check the PW not to be the user part
or a substring of the userpart of the email adress and the domain name.
As many mailserv
switchTestToScoring is off
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:12 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
> >The easiest to explain this is that had I turned Bayesian off, the
> >score
> >would have been 110 and the message blocked.
> >Now with Bayesian on, the score is 129
I am running ASSP version 2.0.2(1.1.09)
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:12 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
> >The easiest to explain this is that had I turned Bayesian off, the
> >score
> >would have been 110 and the message blocked.
> >Now with Bayesian on, the
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>The easiest to explain this is that had I turned Bayesian off, the
>score
>would have been 110 and the message blocked.
>Now with Bayesian on, the score is 129.5,but message only gets tagged
>and passed on because of Bayesian uncertainty.
What version are
Hello.
Thank you for the best spam filter ever!
I would just like to ask whether you can make a small change in how
messages are tagged and rejected.
I am using a low message limit of 40 and a high limit of 100.
I am using baysValencePB of 39(default) and baysConfidenceHalfScore is
enabled.
I am
Cross-posting to ass-user for user feedback please...
It can be used as a tactic to get nefarious files in email to take a exe, bat,
or others, zip it up, and send it. As far as I know, ASSP will scan the base64
parts of an email, or perhaps just look at the filename attachment part in the
con
PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature Request re IP Penalty Blocking
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Unlikely they
>will send you legitimate mail in the future anyway, more likely they
>will send spam after they expire from PB. Just my opinion...
OK, that should help. I'll give 1.6.0 a go.
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:23 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature Request re IP Penalty Blocking
ASSP development mailing list
sch
Ok great, so everyone will have a choice now...I still choose never to
expire them.
On 10/15/2009 3:22 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>
>> Unlikely they
>> will send you legitimate mail in the future anyway, more likely they
>> will send spam after they
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Unlikely they
>will send you legitimate mail in the future anyway, more likely they
>will send spam after they expire from PB. Just my opinion...
However in the newest version of V1 (1.6.0) the meaning of
ForcePBExtreme has changed:
Enforce Early Penal
Thursday, October 15, 2009 11:48 AM
> To: ASSP development mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature Request re IP Penalty Blocking
>
> You have the option to export Penalty Extreme, and can export them
> directly into your denysmtpfrom...file (make sure the append option is
&
t
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature Request re IP Penalty Blocking
You have the option to export Penalty Extreme, and can export them
directly into your denysmtpfrom...file (make sure the append option is
used). I think this is what you wanted
On 10/15/2009 1:23 PM, Steve Moss wrote:
> Here&#
You have the option to export Penalty Extreme, and can export them
directly into your denysmtpfrom...file (make sure the append option is
used). I think this is what you wanted
On 10/15/2009 1:23 PM, Steve Moss wrote:
> Here's my situation: as shown by my ASSP envelope recipient statistics,
>
Here's my situation: as shown by my ASSP envelope recipient statistics,
my mail server gets hit by around 18,000 invalid recipient addresses a
day. This was at around 6,000 per day a year ago, and is continuing to
rise at a fairly steady rate. Now, I'd like to have ASSP reduce the load
on my server
> I think it could be helpful, if ASSP would check all URLs in inomming
> mails with googel safebrowsing to filter out Phising and Malware
> emails:
> http://code.google.com/intl/de/apis/safebrowsing/developers_guide.html
as far as I can tell (and if I recall it correctly), using the
additional C
Hello, it will be very useful for me (hope also for others) if ASSP
would block message bigger then specific size (not size*rcpt).
Thanks.
**Peter Felcan**
SULOCO s.r.o.
1. mája 912/3
039 01 Turc(ianske Teplice
IC(O: 36 665 177
DIC(: 2022230276
IC( DPH: SK2022230276
mobil: +421-918-605715
e-ma
Hello,
I think it could be helpful, if ASSP would check all URLs in inomming
mails with googel safebrowsing to filter out Phising and Malware
emails:
http://code.google.com/intl/de/apis/safebrowsing/developers_guide.html
With best regards
Matti
--
Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh
Recently we've had a couple of mails caught by BombData. While it
helpfully logs the offending text in the ASSP log, could it also display
the line number of the bombre.txt file to make troubleshooting a little
easier? Some of our less experienced support staff have been struggling
with the regex
Hello,
during ASSP testing, we need many restarts
To shorten unavailabe times of our Server, it would be good if there
would be a restart button, that waits until no active connection is
running and then perform a restart.
At the moment it works that when you hit the restart buttotn, all new
conn
Have "ASSP Version" shown in the GUI a link to the appropriate
magicvillage folder for quick downloading/verification.
--
Daniel
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future
I'm using 2.0.0(5.15) and noticed that, when I analysed a problematic
false positive, the result showed:
Suspicious Local Domain in Header: 'by mydomain.com'
This was useful only to the extent that it may indicate a bad
setting, but not exactly which one. Since there are so many 'local'
settin
As a possible aid for the developers - and users too for that matter -
have a new option in Logging for "ASSP version logging". This would add
the ASSP version at the start of the line - maybe before or after the
unique id field.
For installations that are going to be left alone for extended p
As an option, either with a selection box in the GUI or as a separate
e-mail address for the interface, have the ability to analyze a message
without applying the whitelist. This way admins can check samples of
messages they have already received, to verify that these mails would
still pass wi
Hello
Is it possibile to use ASSP with native IPv6?
If not, when can it be done?
IPv4 addresses are running out beginning 2010.
Many ISPs are implementing 'dual stack' now.
Regards Milan
-
This SF.Net email is spo
let's publish 1.4 (and maybe 2?) on SF!
I think both versions run very well even on priduction systems.
Collect all new features for the next versions. We should make a
"whislist" on the Wiki, where anybody can describe his ideas.
Matti
>> ASSP 1.4.1 is going to be published on SF. Is this featu
> ASSP 1.4.1 is going to be published on SF. Is this feature important
> enough to put it in 1.4.1 or should I start 1.4.2 beta?
imVHo 1.4.1 is as good as it may be, so let's freeze
it and queue the idea as a "whish" for the 1.4.2
--
>If you're asking ME
No, I was asking the list.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP 1.4.1 is going to be published on SF. Is this feature important
> enough to put it in 1.4.1 or should I start 1.4.2 beta?
I don't think the release of 1.4.1 should wait. I think its a great
concept, but nothing that worth putting 1.4.1 off for.
signature.asc
Descri
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> Under the model I've described, both DNSBL tests need to be
>> performed,
>> as one test might only score, while the other will either block or
>> add
>> significantly to the score. For this reason also, the standard test
>> should come first as it may result in a bloc
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
