Hey, all. Just added an analog card to our dual-T1 system... and
clearly I'm doing something wrong. Less interested in having the
specifics pointed out than in finding out how/why certain things work.
So, really, three things:
* What the bloody Hell is the difference between
hi,
chan_dahdi is some kind of generic config file, and dahdi-channels the
config file where you configure your channels... so to say hardware
specific.
dahdi-channels.conf is normally a generated file which in turn is
included by chan-dahdi...
it makes sense to me to divide dahdi channel
- Original Message -
From: Ken D'Ambrosio k...@jots.org
Hey, all. Just added an analog card to our dual-T1 system... and
clearly I'm doing something wrong. Less interested in having the
specifics pointed out than in finding out how/why certain things
work.
So, really, three
You are correct, it is stupid 8-)
exten = 233,1,Goto(dial-out,${EXTEN},1)
exten = 255,1,Goto(dial-out,${EXTEN},1)
[dial-out]
exten = _XXX,1,DoStuff()
exten = _XXX,n,AndMoreStuff()
exten = _XXX,n,Dial(something)
exten = _XXX,n,Hangup
-Original Message-
From:
I know Evariste Systems has a product called CSRP -
http://evaristesys.com/pub/CSRP-ProductOverviewCapabilitiesSurvey.pdf -
that looks very interesting and it is built for high-volume scenarios. It
is basically a standalone box you route calls to.
Just my two cents,
l.
2013/3/26 Nick Khamis
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.8.21.0.
This release is available for immediate download at
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk
The release of Asterisk 1.8.21.0 resolves several issues reported by the
community and would have not been
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 11.3.0.
This release is available for immediate download at
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk
The release of Asterisk 11.3.0 resolves several issues reported by the
community and would have not been possible
Hello All,
History ~
I recently took a position with a call center. At the time they had
about 50 agents in a call queue. The queue was setup to ringall. The
agents use Eyebeam softphones. Everything is local lan, no routers,
everything connected via Cisco 3600 10/100 switches.
Now we are
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Gregory Malsack
gmals...@coastalacq.comwrote:
Here's the scenario~
150 agents, all are commission based sales reps. 99% of the calls are
answered within the first ring. the rest are answered between the second
and third ring. Never in my 4 months with the
Asterisk version 1.8.20.1
Already checked the switches, no noteworthy port issues. no vlans used
or layer 3 switching.
On 03/28/2013 03:18 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Gregory Malsack
gmals...@coastalacq.com mailto:gmals...@coastalacq.com wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:55:45 -0500
Gregory Malsack gmals...@coastalacq.com wrote:
History ~
I recently took a position with a call center. At the time they had
about 50 agents in a call queue. The queue was setup to ringall.
The agents use Eyebeam softphones. Everything is local lan, no
Hello,
I'm using Hanhup Handlers in a testing asterisk 11 system.
Within one such handler, I'm setting CDR values.
To me, it seems those changed CDR values are not saved in CDR back-end.
Can you confirm ?
Regards
--
_
--
Hii,
If you like to use ringall strategy only, then better use different
ringgroup to fulfill your purpose.
However, as a callcenter aspect, you should think of roundrobin or
leastrecent strategy. It will solve your purpose also and give a better
performance too by resources i.e. hardware and
13 matches
Mail list logo
