Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 and chan_misdn

2007-03-27 Thread Pierre Burton

Hi,

you also need mISDNuser.

After that make clean  make install you'll have access to chan_misdn.

Regards.

Pierre

Administrator TOOTAI wrote:

Hi list,

I installed a fresh Debian/Etch with Asterisk 1.4 and Zaptel 1.4 from 
SVN for 2 Digium B410P card. I ran configure in Asterisk dir, went in 
zaptel dir and: make, make install, make b410p. Everything is ok. Now I 
want to compile Asterisk but can't activate the chan_misdn channel which 
depends on -from menuselect- isdnnet(E), misdn(E), suppserv(E)


When I made the make b410p, all the misdn stuff was downloaded from 
digium's ftp. Also, running /etc/init.d/misdn-init --scan show me the 2 
cards I have, /etc/init.d/misdn-init --config prepare me the misdn.conf 
and after a /etc/init.d/misdn-init start I see:


mISDN_dsp 191656  0
mISDN_capi 88716  0
mISDN_l2   34452  0
mISDN_l1   11036  0
mISDN_core 71360  6 
mISDN_dsp,hfcmulti,mISDN_capi,l3udss1,mISDN_l2,mISDN_l1

kernelcapi 44576  2 mISDN_capi,capi

My questions: why Asterisk doesn't want to let me activate the misdn 
channel? Is misdn ready for 1.4?


Thanks for any hint


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Moving from Bristuff to mISDN

2007-03-27 Thread Tim Panton


On 26 Mar 2007, at 12:34, Olivier wrote:


Hi,

Beside having to use misdn.conf instead of zaptel.conf, did you  
notice any gain or lost moving from bristuff to misdn ?

I was thinking about callerID, compliance to Telco ISDN, ...


We have had reports that misdn causes asterisk to emit 128byte alaw  
packets instead of 160bytes.
Many endpoints seem to be ok with this, but corraleta for one doesn't  
like this one little bit :-(



Tim Panton

www.mexuar.net
www.westhawk.co.uk/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

2007-03-27 Thread Tim Panton


On 26 Mar 2007, at 16:33, Olivier wrote:


Hello,

1. Is it possible to install several SIP softphones on the same PC,  
have them registered to the same Asterisk server and attribute to  
each softphone a specific extension, ringtones or call forwarding  
rules ?


While this is possible it isn't easy, You will trip over resource  
sharing problems in 2 areas:
	1) port numbers - SIP likes to listen on 5060UDP - you could  
configure each softphone to
use a non-standard port, but you have to tell asterisk that, and any  
other SIP aware network

infrastructure (NAT routers etc)
	2) Audio hardware - assuming you only have one speaker and  
microphone on your PC,

which softphone should get the audio data? How will they decide?



2. Is possible to do the same with SIP hardphones ?


Some hardphones support registering to multiple sip accounts from one  
phone.

(as indeed do some softphones) Is that what you want ?

Tim Panton

www.mexuar.net
www.westhawk.co.uk/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and T38 ?

2007-03-27 Thread Tobias Wolf
Noc Phibee schrieb:
 Hi
 
 i read the list and see a lot of personn say T38 it's not possible
 with asterisk and other says that he use T38 with asterisk ??
 i don't understand ;=)
 
Well, if i understand it correctly then Asterisk currently only supports
T.38-Passthrough, which means, you have to have to T.38 capable
Endpoints which can communicate with an Asterisk in the Media Path.

But you cannot terminate an T.38 Call on an Asterisk Server (say
receiving an Fax with an Asterisk and saving the Fax as an TIFF on the
server).

Anyone feel free to correct me if i am wrong ;)

Cheers,

Tobias
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and T38 ?

2007-03-27 Thread Noc Phibee

Tobias Wolf a écrit :

Noc Phibee schrieb:
  

Hi

i read the list and see a lot of personn say T38 it's not possible
with asterisk and other says that he use T38 with asterisk ??
i don't understand ;=)



Well, if i understand it correctly then Asterisk currently only supports
T.38-Passthrough, which means, you have to have to T.38 capable
Endpoints which can communicate with an Asterisk in the Media Path.

But you cannot terminate an T.38 Call on an Asterisk Server (say
receiving an Fax with an Asterisk and saving the Fax as an TIFF on the
server).

Anyone feel free to correct me if i am wrong ;)

Cheers,

Tobias


Thanks for your answer ;=)

We don't have a solution for use a codec without comrpession for supply 
a line

at a Fax and at a modem ?

Modem/Fax with VoIP never work ?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Limit call duration

2007-03-27 Thread Rizwan Hisham

Yes you can use the L flag but i dont know if there is any system variable
used for this purpose.

On 3/26/07, Suity Zsolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Rizwan Hisham wrote:
 I think you can set absolute timeout variable for incoming call also. I
 havent tested it yet, y dont you try it. do like this:

 before every local extension you can set:

 exten= _XXX,1,SET(Timeout(absolute) = 10)

 exten= 123,2,Dial
 exten= 234,2,Dial

   Yuan Liu
  
   I think you can say something like:
  
   AbsoluteTimeout (or in 1.2x, Set(TIMEOUT(absolute) = seconds) )

Thank you!
It works as I expected.

Can I set some system var to warn caller how many time is left?
(like in Dial L flag)

--
Suich
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Regards
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SRTP vs ZRTP in Asterisk

2007-03-27 Thread Tim Panton


On 26 Mar 2007, at 22:32, Michael Graves wrote:


Hi All,

I've been reading about Phil Zimmermann's ZRTP encryption scheme for
SIP clients. This seems attactive but I don't use soft phones. I'm
guessing that we'd need ZRTP support in Asterisk in
order to use it to secure calls from hard phones.

There seem to be issues with SRTP key exhange between various devices.
So much so that the IETF is working on a standardization project.  
ZRTP,

which is one of the proposals before the
IETF,  overcomes this. Since Zimmermann has open sourced the  
protocol I

would hope that it could be implemented in Asterisk without too much
trouble.

Does the current work on SRTP extend into ZRTP?


At Etel I heard Phil Zimmermann say that he had a working implementation
of ZRTP for asterisk in the lab.

What was less clear was how/when this might be released.

Tim Panton

www.mexuar.net
www.westhawk.co.uk/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] vzaphfc installation...

2007-03-27 Thread Mauro Zanin
Hi everybody,
does anybody knows how to install and configure VZAPHFC?

Thank you

Best regards
Mauro
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Klaverstyn, David C
Hi All,

 

I have installed Asterisk 1.4.2 and have loaded ztdummy as I have no
Digium cards.  The problem I have is that MOH will not play.  It starts
and then stops.

 

asterisk*CLI zap show status

Description  Alarms IRQbpviol
CRC4

ZTDUMMY/1 1  UNCONFIGUR 0  0
0

 

I'm not sure if the above is correct.

 

Please help.

 

Thanks.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: how to define a pilot number

2007-03-27 Thread David Cook
 is it possible to define a pilot number in asterisk, say I have 3
direct
 lines and I want one of those direct lines to be used as pilot number?
 When that number is contacted it will be redirected to  the  available
 zap
 and original zap that receive it will be freed to receive another
call.
 It can only be used when all 2 lines ares used.
Lito

I'm assuming you are talking about analog lines as PRI's will do this
more-or-less naturally.

This is a telco feature as opposed to an Asterisk feature. Here in Bell
Canada country they call it Ringer Equivalence. Call your local
carrier and they should be able to tell you what they call it in their
marketing world. You tell the telco which lines you want the calls to
roll to then all three will terminate calls to the pilot number.

Now it doesn't work exactly as you had described - it doesn't move the
call so as to free up the first port. It merely says the first port is
busy and terminates the next call on the next port in sequence. This
means you can't count on which line is available at any time. For
outbound, you need to put the three lines in an Asterisk group and test
the group for availability to select an available line to dial out on.

dbc.
--
David Cook
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Using server side phonebook directory with SPA941

2007-03-27 Thread Maxim Veksler

Hello list,

I got a couple of those wouldn't it be great questions, as following:

1. Is it possible, with asterisk to hold a central phonebook directory
of callers?, so that when this party calls a textual caller ID will
be displayed on the phone display.

2. How can this be configured with Trixbox, I've looked at the
configuration options - I assume it plays no difference me basing it
on mysql or astdb?

3. What protocol does the phone (Linksys SPA941) talks to the
asterisk server to retrieve this information ?

4. Has someone done this? What softphone should I use to test it first
(I'm connecting it with outlook, so it has to be win* software)


Thanks for helping,
Maxim.


--
Cheers,
Maxim Veksler

Free as in Freedom - Do u GNU ?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] AMI - delete voicemail

2007-03-27 Thread Tomislav Parcina

How can I delete voice mails (all, new and old) from AMI?

I thought that I could use Action Command, but there is no command to 
delete voicemail.


So I figure it out to use system command and execute
rm /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/default/100/INBOX/* and
rm /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/default/100/tmp*

but I don't know how to do that from AMI.

Any suggestions how to do this are welcome.



--
Tomislav Parcina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] snom led not working with asterisk 1.4.1

2007-03-27 Thread Carsten Bock
Steve Murphy wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:00 +0100, Giorgio Incantalupo wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 as you know if you type show hints inside asterisk console you can see 
 phone status. When a phone is not connected, Asterisk says it is 
 Unavailable. With Asterisk 1.2.9.1 my SNOM leds worked well so I knew 
 when a phone was not available but with Asterisk 1.4.1 is not possible 
 anymore. This is one of the functions which I'm trying to keep from 
 Asterisk 1.2.9.1 to 1.4.1 .

 
 Pardon my ignorance! I am new in this area. I have not used my SNOM 360
 with anything but 1.4. When the monitored extension is busy, the LED is
 on; when the extension is ringing, the LED flashes. What does it do for
 you in 1.2, when the line is unavailable?

The LED is also on.
I noticed a change from 1.2 to 1.4:

channels/chan_sip.c, 1.2.13 :

case AST_EXTENSION_UNAVAILABLE:
statestring = confirmed;
local_state = NOTIFY_CLOSED;
pidfstate = away;
pidfnote = Unavailable;



Asterisk 1.4.2 channels/chan_sip.c Line 6892
function static int transmit_state_notify(...)


case AST_EXTENSION_UNAVAILABLE:
statestring = terminated;
local_state = NOTIFY_CLOSED;
pidfstate = away;
pidfnote = Unavailable;


The var statestring has changed. I changed it back to confirmed and the 
phone shows the unavailable state.

ciao,
Carsten

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Question about DSP in Digium card

2007-03-27 Thread A. Levy

well, ...,we did not choose SIP because our customers are located behind NAT
router (using private IP's) and those routers
are not managed by them but by the ISP so it is very difficult to establish
full duplex phone calls because
you can not initiate voice over ip session from the internet (outside) to
LAN side (inside) with private IP's. We could not establish
2-way phone calls, I mean, the conversation is listened in 1-way only. As I
mentioned before, we can not configure PAT into the NAT router neither
because is handled by the ISP and the passwords are unknown 
That's  why we decided to use IAX instead of SIP, I mean, IAX is more robust
than SIP when the NAT router is 3th-party managed and
the PAT feature is not enable.
On the other and we tested IAX over dialup links and it worked fine
Those are the reasons we choose IAX as acess protocol to our SIP/H323
Network. You know, the access networks of the customers are different
completely: Private IP Address over DSL lines (NAT Router), Public IP
Address over DSL lines, Corporate Networks over dedicated Links (Public
and IP Addresses), Dialup links, ..
Any comment would be welcomed,
thanks a lot

Levy.-

2007/3/24, A. Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hello.

I have a TE405P Digium Card (4 E1's) with ISDN protocol and I need to find
out if there is any limitation about DSP capabilities, I mean, I am not sure
how many phone calls my Digium card supports, simultaneously. The calling
flow goes from IAX - ISDN.

I am running this card into CPU like this:
- Micro PIV 3.0
- 1Gbyte Memory


Thanks.

Levy.-


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and T38 ?

2007-03-27 Thread Matt

Just for my 2cents.. Faxing can and does work over G711u.   We do it.
Although it stops working when your Internet connection gets jittery, it
does work.

On 3/27/07, Noc Phibee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Tobias Wolf a écrit :
 Noc Phibee schrieb:

 Hi

 i read the list and see a lot of personn say T38 it's not possible
 with asterisk and other says that he use T38 with asterisk ??
 i don't understand ;=)


 Well, if i understand it correctly then Asterisk currently only supports
 T.38-Passthrough, which means, you have to have to T.38 capable
 Endpoints which can communicate with an Asterisk in the Media Path.

 But you cannot terminate an T.38 Call on an Asterisk Server (say
 receiving an Fax with an Asterisk and saving the Fax as an TIFF on the
 server).

 Anyone feel free to correct me if i am wrong ;)

 Cheers,

 Tobias

Thanks for your answer ;=)

We don't have a solution for use a codec without comrpession for supply
a line
at a Fax and at a modem ?

Modem/Fax with VoIP never work ?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk MSOutlook Dialer

2007-03-27 Thread San Singhania
Hello everyone,

we just wrote a little MSOutlook address book dialer interfaced with Asterisk. 
It is a small (400k) exe that you need to install. It is completely free to 
use, either for educational purpose or otherwise. You can download it at 
http://www.voip.com.sg/voip_products/voip_asterisk_outlook_dialer.html  . 
Please send your comments to
me directly as I am the developer for it. 


With Regards, 

Sandeep Singhania
Lantone Information Systems LLP
Tel : SG +65 62271149 (Ext 958) US +1 646 8621550 (ext 958) UK +44 207 0239247 
(ext 958) 
Fax : +65 68750242 
Mobile: +65 97471958

Visit our websites to learn more about our products :
www.voip.com.sg (Learn more about VOIP and how we can help you implement it)
www.mailtracking.com (Track your emails, featured in Channel News Asia and 
various other publications around the world)
www.callaccounting.ws (Home of the  world's most popular Call Accounting System 
proudly developed by us)
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: how to define a pilot number

2007-03-27 Thread Lito Lampitoc

thanks for enlightening. So you mean, if I have 3 lines when the caller
dialled the first line and it was busy, the call will be diverted to the
next two available lines in random?

On 3/27/07, David Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 is it possible to define a pilot number in asterisk, say I have 3
direct
 lines and I want one of those direct lines to be used as pilot number?
 When that number is contacted it will be redirected to  the  available
zap
 and original zap that receive it will be freed to receive another
call.
 It can only be used when all 2 lines ares used.
Lito

I'm assuming you are talking about analog lines as PRI's will do this
more-or-less naturally.

This is a telco feature as opposed to an Asterisk feature. Here in Bell
Canada country they call it Ringer Equivalence. Call your local
carrier and they should be able to tell you what they call it in their
marketing world. You tell the telco which lines you want the calls to
roll to then all three will terminate calls to the pilot number.

Now it doesn't work exactly as you had described - it doesn't move the
call so as to free up the first port. It merely says the first port is
busy and terminates the next call on the next port in sequence. This
means you can't count on which line is available at any time. For
outbound, you need to put the three lines in an Asterisk group and test
the group for availability to select an available line to dial out on.

dbc.
--
David Cook
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] UK BT PRI

2007-03-27 Thread Steve Kennedy
Has anyone got a working zaptel.conf and zapata.conf for a Digium
Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card.

It's connected to a BT ISDN PRI (EuroISDN) with 24 channels.

Inbound works fine, but outbound isn't setting CLI (it seems the line
supports 6 digit CLI). Inbound CLI works fine.

In the dial-plan using Set(CALLERID(num)=123456)
then Dial(Zap/g1/01234567||frT)

Where 123456 is in the range of BT allocated numbers.

Using Asterisk 1.4.1 and Zaptel 1.4.0

Any help appreciated.


Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd  UK mob +44-(0)7775 755503
UK +44-(0)20 79932612 / US +1-(310)8577715 / Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Skype/GoogleTalk/AIM/Gizmo/Mac stevekennedyuk / MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Euro Tech News Blog http://eurotechnews.blogspot.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Using server side phonebook directory with SPA941

2007-03-27 Thread Robert Lister
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:45:44PM +0200, Maxim Veksler wrote:
 Hello list,
 
 I got a couple of those wouldn't it be great questions, as following:
 
 1. Is it possible, with asterisk to hold a central phonebook directory
 of callers?, so that when this party calls a textual caller ID will
 be displayed on the phone display.

Can be done reasonably easily in the dial plan. What I have is quite noddy 
but it does the job. In the incoming bits of dial plan where calls come in, 
I call this as a macro in the context where incoming calls arrive, before 
handing it off to the Dial() bits:

exten = _4535XX,1,Macro(setisdncallerid,${EXTEN},PSTN,9)

What this macro (pasted below) does is allow alpha tagging of incoming 
calls, plus some defaulty stuff set by the gateway (caller ID not 
present/withheld comes through in my case as either anonymous or just 0 or 
00, so this macro tidies this up before passing the call on.)

It also inserts the access digit (9) in front of the caller ID as in my case 
outside calls need a 9 prefix. This is just so that call routing works 
correctly if people return missed calls/save numbers from the handset etc.
Obviously you will have to tweak this for your setup.

If there is no alpha tag in the DB, it sets some defaulty thing (In my case 
PSTN to give some indication where the call is coming from.)

It can also do a CPI tag based on destination number, for queues/group 
numbers, so that the alpha tag on the call gets set to something like 
Main Number etc. to distinguish a DDI call from a Queue Call.

The database entries look like:

*CLIdatabase put tag 01234567890 Some Name Here

and for CPI (called party) Tag:

*CLIdatabase put 453510 tag Helpdesk

[macro-setisdncallerid]
; ${ARG1} = Called Party Number (XX) as presented from BT.
; ${ARG2} = default tag to add to incoming calls
; ${ARG3} = prefix to insert to incoming CLI
;
; Frobs the incoming caller ID headers how we like it:

exten = s,1,NoOp(macro-setisdncallerid: ${ARG1})

; In my case the internal extension is 7XX where XX is the
; last two digits of the incoming DDI number. This just makes
; it display right in the caller ID:
exten = s,2,Set(DIALED_EXTEN=7${ARG1:-2})

; For cisco phone, set different ring cadence to indicate
; an external call:
exten = s,3,SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: Bellcore-dr2)

exten = s,4,GotoIf($[ ${CALLERID(num)} = anonymous ]?400)
exten = s,5,GotoIf($[ ${CALLERID(num)} = 0 ]?500)
exten = s,6,GotoIf($[ ${CALLERID(num)} = 00 ]?500)
exten = s,7,GotoIf($[ ${DB(tag/${CALLERID(num)})} != ]?700)
exten = s,8,Set(CALLERID(name)=${ARG2} to ${DIALED_EXTEN})
exten = s,9,Set(CALLERID(num)=${ARG3}${CALLERID(num)})
exten = s,10,Goto(900)

exten = s,400,Set(CALLERID(name)=${ARG2})
exten = s,401,Goto(900)

exten = s,500,Set(CALLERID(num)=unknown)
exten = s,501,Set(CALLERID(name)=${ARG2})
exten = s,502,Goto(900)

exten = s,700,Set(CALLERID(name)=${DB(tag/${CALLERID(num)})})
exten = s,701,Set(CALLERID(num)=${ARG3}${CALLERID(num)})
exten = s,702,Goto(900)

; If there is a CPI tag set, use that: (i.e. SUPPORT)
exten = s,900,GotoIf($[ ${DB(${ARG1}/cpitag)} != ]?950)

exten = s,950,Set(CALLERID(name)=${DB(${ARG1}/cpitag)})

 2. How can this be configured with Trixbox, I've looked at the
 configuration options - I assume it plays no difference me basing it
 on mysql or astdb?
 
 3. What protocol does the phone (Linksys SPA941) talks to the
 asterisk server to retrieve this information ?

When an incoming call arrives with asterisk, the SIP headers can be set 
appropriately before you present this information to the handset. It's in 
the incoming SIP packets to the handset.

 4. Has someone done this? What softphone should I use to test it first
 (I'm connecting it with outlook, so it has to be win* software)

There are a few to choose from. I use Counterpath's X-Lite client:
http://www.counterpath.com/

Rob

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Question about DSP in Digium card

2007-03-27 Thread Brad Sumrall
Whether it is IAX, SIP, H323 or ?

 

These are authentication handshakes to establish an rtp stream.

 

SIP = user name and password in a standardized IP packet

IAX = same

H.323 = same

 

Is also has to do with what codec are supported as well.

 

As far as NAT is concerned!

 

Yep, tell your ISP to forward the authentication port or just junk their
gear and get something like a low end Cisco.

 

Or

 

Get IP Phones with STUN (a little pricey)

 

Or

 

Trick

 

Use some type of tunneling gear to an outside IP (outside your NAT) and then
bounce your authentication from this new gateway!!!

i.e. establish a VPN connection to an outside router from an internal router
and drive the call through there.

 

Brad

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Levy
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:54 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Question about DSP in Digium card

 

well, ...,we did not choose SIP because our customers are located behind NAT
router (using private IP's) and those routers
are not managed by them but by the ISP so it is very difficult to establish
full duplex phone calls because 
you can not initiate voice over ip session from the internet (outside) to
LAN side (inside) with private IP's. We could not establish 
2-way phone calls, I mean, the conversation is listened in 1-way only. As I
mentioned before, we can not configure PAT into the NAT router neither 
because is handled by the ISP and the passwords are unknown 
That's  why we decided to use IAX instead of SIP, I mean, IAX is more robust
than SIP when the NAT router is 3th-party managed and
the PAT feature is not enable. 
On the other and we tested IAX over dialup links and it worked fine
Those are the reasons we choose IAX as acess protocol to our SIP/H323
Network. You know, the access networks of the customers are different
completely: Private IP Address over DSL lines (NAT Router), Public IP
Address over DSL lines, Corporate Networks over dedicated Links (Public 
and IP Addresses), Dialup links, .. 
Any comment would be welcomed,
thanks a lot

Levy.-

2007/3/24, A. Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

Hello.

 

I have a TE405P Digium Card (4 E1's) with ISDN protocol and I need to find
out if there is any limitation about DSP capabilities, I mean, I am not sure
how many phone calls my Digium card supports, simultaneously. The calling
flow goes from IAX - ISDN. 
 

I am running this card into CPU like this:

- Micro PIV 3.0 

- 1Gbyte Memory

 

 

Thanks.

 

Levy.-
 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Doorphone

2007-03-27 Thread Ray Wadkins
I looked at a call queue, but it didn't seem to work the way I want.  Agents 
need to log into the queue to get calls, seemingly.  Of course, I only stopped 
on the topic for a short period.  with the meetme conference, anyone can answer 
the door from any phone by dialing the conference extension, just not open the 
door.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ola Lidholm
Sent: Mon 3/26/2007 7:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone




On 26 mar 2007, at 22.17, Ray Wadkins wrote:

 We have a doorphone device that's connected to our PBX.  Currently, 
 there's a special meetme conference that the phone connects to when 
 the visitor presses zero.  Users in the office can dial the meetme 
 conference and get connected.  The problem is that we can't send 
 DTMF signals to the door to open it, because the meetme app seems 
 to capture them.

 I had the bright idea to set up a virtual extension that would 
 just ring, virtually.  Then we could use call pickup to snag the 
 call at an extension and be able to open the door.  Unfortunately, 
 I can't figure out how to get that to work.  Wait(30) and Answer
 (3) don't seem to allow call pickup to snag the extension.

 Any suggestions?

Hi Ray,

I can't really understand why you want to use a meetme conference? 
Why not use a call queue instead?

/Ola Lidholm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Whatever one man is capable of conceiving, other men are able to 
achieve. - Jules Verne.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


winmail.dat___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: how to define a pilot number

2007-03-27 Thread Lee Jenkins

Lito Lampitoc wrote:
thanks for enlightening. So you mean, if I have 3 lines when the caller 
dialled the first line and it was busy, the call will be diverted to the 
next two available lines in random?




I don't think it's random.  I think its just sequential.  If main line 
is busy, try second.  If that is unavailable, then try third in 
sequence, etc.


It's called rollover here.

--

Warm Regards,

Lee


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

2007-03-27 Thread Olivier


 2. Is possible to do the same with SIP hardphones ?

Some hardphones support registering to multiple sip accounts from one
phone.
(as indeed do some softphones) Is that what you want ?

Yes but my question is :

Is it possible to register 2 accounts for the same user and hardphone
within the same Asterisk server ?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Question about DSP in Digium card

2007-03-27 Thread Salvatore Giudice
 

 

You've got a decent server. Generally the limiting factor for the number of
simultaneous calls is more about server memory. That server could likely
handle 124 simultaneous calls, but you would be prudent to double that
memory size. Make sure you are running at 100 full especially if you are
using G.711. 10 Full uplinks won't cut it if you are running that kind of
bandwidth.

 

As for the DSP, you are right to be concerned about the Digium cards, but
not because of the DSP. The DSP is not where you will run into problems.
Digium cards feature 2 year old circuitry and do not play well with other
devices. You have to take care not to share interrupts with any components
that may be active on that system. Sharing an IRQ between a Digum card and
an Ethernet card would certainly spell disaster in my experience.

 

From personal experience, I no longer use Digium hardware since I could
rarely push a quad port card to more than 13 channels per T1 circuit without
the card failing miserably. HDLC aborts abound.

 

For now, I only use Sangoma cards. These don't have the IRQ issues and I
have had no problems pushing their cards to their maximum. I recommend echo
canceller enabled cards for any T1/E1's you may use that are not long
distance carrier lines. 

 

Good luck, hope this helps with your capacity planning. - SG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

##

2007/3/24, A. Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

Hello.

 

I have a TE405P Digium Card (4 E1's) with ISDN protocol and I need to find
out if there is any limitation about DSP capabilities, I mean, I am not sure
how many phone calls my Digium card supports, simultaneously. The calling
flow goes from IAX - ISDN. 
 

I am running this card into CPU like this:

- Micro PIV 3.0 

- 1Gbyte Memory

 

 

Thanks.

 

Levy.-
 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

2007-03-27 Thread Salvatore Giudice
Asterisk can handle multiple registrations for the same account. Both should
ring when calls come in. If you are using the same account for both line
appearances, theoretically it should work on a phone like a Cisco 7960, but
it would behave strangely when calls came in. Both line appearances would
indicate an inbound call. 

 

If you are using two different accounts, there will be no problems at all.
Each line appearance would register and could receive calls on either.

 

Good luck, SG 

 

--

Salvatore Giudice

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

VoIP Security Training, LLC

http:// http://VoIPSecurityTraining.com VoIPSecurityTraining.com


848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #1676
Las Vegas, NV 89107

Phone: (702) 979-2906
 Fax: (212) 279-2906

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:33 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

 

 


 2. Is possible to do the same with SIP hardphones ?

Some hardphones support registering to multiple sip accounts from one 
phone.
(as indeed do some softphones) Is that what you want ?

Yes but my question is :
Is it possible to register 2 accounts for the same user and hardphone
within the same Asterisk server ? 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Question about DSP in Digium card

2007-03-27 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Salvatore Giudice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From personal experience, I no longer use Digium hardware since I could
 rarely push a quad port card to more than 13 channels per T1 circuit without
 the card failing miserably. HDLC aborts abound.

This usually happens if you have left the software echo canceller enabled,
because all the zaptel echo cancellation happens in the interrupt service
routine (!!!).

With echo cancellation disabled, I have found that I can fill a TE405P/TE410P
with calls quite happily on a single P4 at 2.8GHz, and no HDLC aborts.

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] cisco 7905

2007-03-27 Thread Khaled Chehab
How to configure cisco 7905 with asterisk ,if you please can send me step by
step configuration steps .

Thanks

 

Regards 

 

Khaled Chehab

System Integration Engineer

Xplorium Offshore.

Sakiet Al Janzir

Postal Code: 1102-2080

Tel: (961) 1- 868 686

Fax :(961) 1-808 810

GSM: (961) 3-979 343

 




*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 106

2007-03-27 Thread David Cook
 Lito Lampitoc wrote:
  thanks for enlightening. So you mean, if I have 3 lines when the
 caller
  dialled the first line and it was busy, the call will be diverted
 to the
  next two available lines in random?
 

 I don't think it's random.  I think its just sequential.  If main
 line
 is busy, try second.  If that is unavailable, then try third in
 sequence, etc.

 It's called rollover here.

Correct, its in the sequence you told the carrier you want.

Caveat, You _can_ have contention with analog lines. Meaning someone
calling in at precisely the same time as someone calling out - not
often, but it will happen. To help aleviate this, get the carrier to
roll the lines 1-2-3 and outbound you pick the lines 3-2-1.

- dbc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] IAX Experiences [WAS: Question about DSP in Digium card]

2007-03-27 Thread Noah Miller

Hi Steve -

Sorry for the dupe, but since this is now way off-thread, I thought
I'd create a new one (and correct my spelling mistake).


Just my personal experience, but I do not find IAX to be very reliable.
Is there any particular reason you are not using SIP?


I'm curious as to your negative experiences with IAX.  I generally use
it for multi-office installations, and have had good experiences.
What reliability issues did you see?  Jitter?  Drops?

Thanks,
Noah
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] AOC billing

2007-03-27 Thread Stefano Corsi

Hello,

is there someone who knows if I can use AOC for billing in Asterisk? 
I mean: let's say I have an external SIP device that produces AOC 
data. This device connects me to the telco network. Can Asterisk, if 
connected via SIP with this device, collect AOC data and put it in 
the CDR records?


If not, which is the right way to use AOC for billing?

Thanks a lot
Stefano Corsi

--
Stefano Corsi
www.floo.it
via della Fiera, 1
57029, Venturina - Campiglia Marittima (LI)
Tel. 0565-836130 - Fax. 0565-836143
Cell. 320-3484294 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] cisco 7905

2007-03-27 Thread Shaikh Jallaluddin
Khaled,
 
Check this URL
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_tech_note09186a
0080094584.shtml

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Khaled Chehab
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:54 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [asterisk-users] cisco 7905 



How to configure cisco 7905 with asterisk ,if you please can send me step by
step configuration steps .

Thanks

 

Regards 

 

Khaled Chehab

System Integration Engineer

Xplorium Offshore.

Sakiet Al Janzir

Postal Code: 1102-2080

Tel: (961) 1- 868 686

Fax :(961) 1-808 810

GSM: (961) 3-979 343

 



  _  

*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written
confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual
in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or
its subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any
of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other
defects.
*

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: how to define a pilot number

2007-03-27 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling

Lee Jenkins wrote:

Lito Lampitoc wrote:
thanks for enlightening. So you mean, if I have 3 lines when the 
caller dialled the first line and it was busy, the call will be 
diverted to the next two available lines in random?




I don't think it's random.  I think its just sequential.  If main line 
is busy, try second.  If that is unavailable, then try third in 
sequence, etc.


It's called rollover here.



It is also called a hunt group.  The telco will usually roll the call 
the the next available line in the huntgroup.  However they can also 
roll to the longest idle line.  This can help in modem pools where if 
a modem connected to the 2nd (or whatever) line of the hunt group dies 
then the line won't be busy and the call won't roll over.  longest 
idle can at least let most callers get thru in the event of a failure 
on one of the modems.


When dealing with analog lines you have to be concerned about glare. 
Glare happens when the PBX picks up a line at the exact moement the 
telco sends a call to the line.  One way to do this is to have the PBX 
hunt from the top of the hunt group and work its way down, and have the 
telco hunt from the bottom up.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone

2007-03-27 Thread Time Bandit

On 3/27/07, Ray Wadkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I looked at a call queue, but it didn't seem to work the way I want.  Agents 
need to log into the queue to get calls, seemingly.  Of course, I only stopped 
on the topic for a short period.  with the meetme conference, anyone can answer 
the door from any phone by dialing the conference extension, just not open the 
door.



You can have static agents so they don't have to login, check
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+call+queues

Wondering why you don't just dial multiple-phones, like this
Dial(SIP/7001SIP/7002SIP/7003)

The first one that answer the call is the lucky one. That way, your
DTMF signals would work.

hth
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Queue App - Free agent and waiting calls

2007-03-27 Thread equis software

Any news of this behavior?
bweschke, could you  work on this bug??

On 3/19/07, equis software [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Please send me any news about this or the bug number.

Thanks for your time.


On 3/19/07, BJ Weschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 On 3/19/07, equis software  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Asterisk 1.4
   I have strategy= leastrecent and autofill = yes
 
   I have 2 agents, one is answering a call and the other is free and
 have
  some calls waiting in the queue.
   Only when the first agent hangup the second agent receive the first
 call in
  the queue.
   It happends some times.
 

 I believe there is a bug open in Mantis on this, and I intend to
 reproduce and start working on it this week to get a resolution.

 --
 Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc.
 http://www.btwtech.com/
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Doorphone

2007-03-27 Thread Ray Wadkins
Responsibility for answering the door is shared by the entire office.  But A) 
noone wants their phone to ring, there's a door chime) and B) noone specific 
will accept responsibility for answering the door.  So, we need a solution that 
follow I'm answering the door now, these are the buttons I push.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Time Bandit
Sent: Tue 3/27/2007 10:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone



On 3/27/07, Ray Wadkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I looked at a call queue, but it didn't seem to work the way I want.  Agents 
 need to log into the queue to get calls, seemingly.  Of course, I only 
 stopped on the topic for a short period.  with the meetme conference, anyone 
 can answer the door from any phone by dialing the conference extension, just 
 not open the door.


You can have static agents so they don't have to login, check
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+call+queues

Wondering why you don't just dial multiple-phones, like this
Dial(SIP/7001SIP/7002SIP/7003)

The first one that answer the call is the lucky one. That way, your
DTMF signals would work.

hth
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


winmail.dat___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Joe Acquisto
What are peoples experience with the reliability of the TDM400p.  Specifically 
in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is the 022 (?) model.

Is this board prone to random failures?

joe a.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] just call to user

2007-03-27 Thread Josu Lazkano Lete
hello i have installed Asterisk on a Debian machine by apt-get install asterisk

I only want to call a user inside the LAN, what files I have to edit???

sip.conf???

thanks for all___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Dave Fullerton

Joe Acquisto wrote:

What are peoples experience with the reliability of the TDM400p.  Specifically 
in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is the 022 (?) model.

Is this board prone to random failures?

joe a.



I'm using one at home in that exact configuration. I have a POTS line 
and a dock-n-talk cell station on the FXOs and two cordless on the FXSs. 
I don't recall ever experiencing any failures with it. But, being it's a 
home PBX it doesn't get a lot of traffic either.


-Dave
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] just call to user

2007-03-27 Thread Michelle Dupuis
Asterisk isn't a simple apt-get and run type program...have a look at the
asterisk wiki for help getting started.  There's a lot to configure
 
MD

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josu Lazkano
Lete
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:20 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] just call to user


hello i have installed Asterisk on a Debian machine by apt-get install
asterisk
 
I only want to call a user inside the LAN, what files I have to edit???
 
sip.conf???
 
thanks for all
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: SIP/IAX peers UNREACHABLE and audio loss

2007-03-27 Thread Edoardo Serra

Hi all,
	I made some tests under heavy network load generated artificially 
moving files form server to server


I noticed a 3% packet loss in ping -f response form server involved in 
big data transfer (1 GB files through http)


I changed the network switch with a Cisco Catalyst 2950 and the packet 
loss with pings disapperead but the problem with REACHABLE / UNREACHABLE 
peers remains...


I did one more simple test
While Asterisk is stating the peer is UNREACHABLE I can ping (even -f) 
it without problem and without packet loss.


Could it be a problem in Asterisk ?

I'm using 1.2.13 on a gentoo
Kernel 2.6.20

Tnx again for help

Edoardo


Edoardo Serra ha scritto:

Hi all,
I'm having a problem with some Asterisk servers interconnected with 
each other using IAX (I also tried with SIP without solving the problem)


Sometimes, with apparently no reason, some peers become UNREACHABLE
(I have qualify=yes in iax.conf) and REACHABLE again as soon as
another qualify test is made.

Our users are also complaining about audio loss during their calls,
apparently randomly, everything goes ok for days and bad for another few 
days.


I strongly believe the 2 problems are strictly related because in the 
logs I see REACHABLE / UNREACHABLE messages only for certains days

without regularity.
The days in wich i see a lot of messages are exactly the days with
most of complaint about audio loss

I just noticed that timestamps of the logs (REACHABLE / UNREACHABLE)
are quite always during business hours, this makes me think at somewhat 
related to load (cpu load, badwidth load, calls load, etc...)


But, looking at hardware specs of our lan, servers and average load I 
don't think they are over-stressed.


Our servers are all:
2 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz
1 GB RAM
2 x IDE HDDs Software RAID 1
Asterisk 1.2.13 with res_perl
Gentoo Linux
Some of them has a Sangoma card connected with an E1

Most ot these are on the same LAN, interconnected with a 1 GB switch
(I don't think it should be a bandwidth problem).

Load averages of these server is varying from 0.5 to 1.0
(I guess it should be ok)

On each server we don't have more than 50 concurrent calls
(bridged SIP - IAX2 or IAX2 - ZAP)

Used codec is mostly G729

Sometimes on asterisk cli i see some messages like
Avoided initial deadlock for '0x9fd130', 10 retries!
I don't know if it could be somehow related.

Someone of you can point me in the right direction ?

Tnx in advance

Regards

Ing. Edoardo Serra
WeBRainstorm S.r.l.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

2007-03-27 Thread Peter Bowyer

On 27/03/07, Salvatore Giudice
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Asterisk can handle multiple registrations for the same account. Both should
ring when calls come in.


No it can't - the latest registration 'wins'. To achieve simutaneous
ringing of more than one phone (hard or soft), you need a SIP account
for each and an entry in the dialplan which rings both.

Peter
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE : [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 and chan_misdn

2007-03-27 Thread f6hqz-m
Hi Pierre and the list,

I have the habit to do like this after having compiled Zaptel and Libpri :

cd /usr/src/
  wget http://www.misdn.org/downloads/mISDN.tar.gz
  wget http://www.misdn.org/downloads/mISDNuser.tar.gz
  tar xzf mISDN.tar.gz 
  tar xzf mISDNuser.tar.gz
  cd mISDN-1_1_1
  make install
  cd ../mISDNuser-1_1_1
  make install

Move the modules which are in the bad directory :

mkdir /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra
cp /lib/modules/extra/*.* /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra

Make the mISDN config files :

/etc/init.d/misdn-init config

Start mISDN :

/etc/init.d/misdn-init start

Go ahead and compile Asterisk :

cd /usr/src/asterisk-1.4
  ./configure
  make menuselect   ; choose your options !
  make;make install

I hope this help !

Best Regards,
Francois BERGERET,
France.

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Pierre Burton
Envoyé : mardi 27 mars 2007 10:09
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 and chan_misdn


Hi,

you also need mISDNuser.

After that make clean  make install you'll have access to chan_misdn.

Regards.

Pierre

Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 I installed a fresh Debian/Etch with Asterisk 1.4 and Zaptel 1.4 from
 SVN for 2 Digium B410P card. I ran configure in Asterisk dir, went in 
 zaptel dir and: make, make install, make b410p. Everything is ok. Now I 
 want to compile Asterisk but can't activate the chan_misdn channel which 
 depends on -from menuselect- isdnnet(E), misdn(E), suppserv(E)
 
 When I made the make b410p, all the misdn stuff was downloaded from
 digium's ftp. Also, running /etc/init.d/misdn-init --scan show me the 2 
 cards I have, /etc/init.d/misdn-init --config prepare me the misdn.conf 
 and after a /etc/init.d/misdn-init start I see:
 
 mISDN_dsp 191656  0
 mISDN_capi 88716  0
 mISDN_l2   34452  0
 mISDN_l1   11036  0
 mISDN_core 71360  6 
 mISDN_dsp,hfcmulti,mISDN_capi,l3udss1,mISDN_l2,mISDN_l1
 kernelcapi 44576  2 mISDN_capi,capi
 
 My questions: why Asterisk doesn't want to let me activate the misdn
 channel? Is misdn ready for 1.4?
 
 Thanks for any hint
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] P-Asserted-Identify or Remote-Party-ID, or both?

2007-03-27 Thread Matt

For INBOUND calls, does Asterisk support P-Asserted-Identify or
Remote-Party-ID, or does it support both?  Again, this is for INBOUND only.
I know how to add those headers for outbound calls.

My guess from what I have seen is that it supports both, but I wanted to
check with the list.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Phil Reynolds
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:15:57AM -0400, Joe Acquisto wrote:
 What are peoples experience with the reliability of the TDM400p.  
 Specifically in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is the 022 (?) model.

I have a 3 FXS and 1 FXO. Apart from the FXO blowing the first time the
line rang, which my supplier quickly replaced, I have had no real
problems, other than the odd power alarm on the FXS modules.

-- 
Phil Reynolds
 o   mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|L_ \  / Web: http://www.tinsleyviaduct.com/phil/
(_)- \/  Waltham 66, Emley Moor 69, Droitwich 79, Windows 95
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Ira

At 08:25 AM 3/27/2007, you wrote:
What are peoples experience with the reliability of the 
TDM400p.  Specifically in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is 
the 022 (?) model.

Is this board prone to random failures?


I have an TDM04 that has been working perfectly for over a year.  I 
only have it connected to phone lines, all my phones are SIP and the 
only problem ever was echo and the HPEC has fixed that.


Ira 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Bagnall
 What are peoples experience with the reliability of the
 TDM400p.  Specifically in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is
 the 022 (?) model.
 Is this board prone to random failures?

We have quite a few dotted around clients' places to handle emergency calls 
(and a few other call types we can't run through IAX/SIP to our carrier). I've 
never had one actually *fail* in the last few years, though they can be 
something of a nightmare to get right with echo issues and the like.

Most of ours are in either 1 or 2 FXO configuration - only a couple have FXS 
modules on them.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it/chris.html
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread John Novack

We have had much better success with the Sangoma A200
Excellent support from Sangoma
Works in all modern motherboards - no try another motherboard answers 
from support

Expandable, if needed, to 24 ports
Lower price per port, depending on your supplier.

John Novack


Joe Acquisto wrote:

What are peoples experience with the reliability of the TDM400p.  Specifically 
in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is the 022 (?) model.

Is this board prone to random failures?

joe a.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 106

2007-03-27 Thread shadowym

I think it is called hunt group in my neck of the woods. 

-Original Message-
From: David Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:54 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 106

 Lito Lampitoc wrote:
  thanks for enlightening. So you mean, if I have 3 lines when the
 caller
  dialled the first line and it was busy, the call will be diverted
 to the
  next two available lines in random?
 

 I don't think it's random.  I think its just sequential.  If main line 
 is busy, try second.  If that is unavailable, then try third in 
 sequence, etc.

 It's called rollover here.

Correct, its in the sequence you told the carrier you want.

Caveat, You _can_ have contention with analog lines. Meaning someone calling
in at precisely the same time as someone calling out - not often, but it
will happen. To help aleviate this, get the carrier to roll the lines 1-2-3
and outbound you pick the lines 3-2-1.

- dbc


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Dave Fullerton


There are downsides to the A200 (which I have had very good luck with as 
well and highly recommend, don't get me wrong). You have to install FXO 
or FXS ports in pairs, you can't do 3 FXO and 1 FXS for example. The 
other is having to manage one more set of drivers (wanpipe). Not a big 
deal though and I've never had any problems doing so.


To start a bunny trail, your try another motherboard comment made me 
wonder about this new VoiceBus technology mentioned on the new TDM800 
and TE120P cards. What exactly is it? Is is just a new PCI interface on 
the card? What makes it work so much better than the other cards?


-Dave


John Novack wrote:

We have had much better success with the Sangoma A200
Excellent support from Sangoma
Works in all modern motherboards - no try another motherboard answers 
from support

Expandable, if needed, to 24 ports
Lower price per port, depending on your supplier.

John Novack


Joe Acquisto wrote:
What are peoples experience with the reliability of the TDM400p.  
Specifically in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is the 022 (?) 
model.


Is this board prone to random failures?

joe a.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] P-Asserted-Identify or Remote-Party-ID, or both?

2007-03-27 Thread Kristian Kielhofner

On 3/27/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

For INBOUND calls, does Asterisk support P-Asserted-Identify or
Remote-Party-ID, or does it support both?  Again, this is for INBOUND only.
I know how to add those headers for outbound calls.

My guess from what I have seen is that it supports both, but I wanted to
check with the list.



Matt,

 I don't know if it supports PAI yet, but to get RPID you need to set:

trustrpid=yes

in [general] or for the peer.


--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Ken Williams
We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first 5
parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking lot
extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the announce
part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to find to
disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.
 
Thanks for any help,
Ken
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Matt

Ken,
Just curious, how did you make the Granstream's lights light up when someone
is parked?

On 3/27/07, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first 5
parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking lot
extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the announce
part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to find to disable
the announce so the transfer happens faster.

Thanks for any help,
Ken

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 30VIP Phone

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Nighswonger

Is anyone else on the list using Cisco 30VIP phones with the
chan_skinny driver? I have tried to catch the one of the developers on
the chat relay, but cannot seem to get anywhere.

I am trying to understand how the soft buttons are setup. They are
apparently hard-coded into the chan_skinny.c module. Specifically, I
am looking for how the code relates to the actual layout of the
buttons on the phone.

So far, I cannot even get the buttons that are in the code by default
to work properly. I have several of these phones up and registered
with *. The dialpads work fine. But other buttons do not.

Thanks

Chris

On 3/23/07, Chris Nighswonger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 3/23/07, Chris Nighswonger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have three registering with * and having basic functionality. I am
 at a loss to know how to program the buttons (other than dtmf, hold,
 mute, spkr). Here is what the * console shows when one of the phones
 registers:

 -- Starting Skinny session from 192.168.0.70
 -- Device 'SEP000196C00CDC' successfully registered
 Device capability set to '12'
 Adding button: 9, 1
 Adding button: 1, 0
 Adding button: 15, 0
 Adding button: 126, 0
 Adding button: 5, 0
 Adding button: 125, 0

 It appears that * is setting up some buttons. But where it is getting
 the config info, I don't know.

Sorry for answering my own post, however it may help someone else:

Soft button configuration is set in skinny.c

I'm still looking for some explaination of the logic and sytax of setting them.

Chris




--
Chris Nighswonger
Network  Systems Director
Foundations Bible College  Seminary
www.foundations.edu
www.fbcradio.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V:910-892-8761
C:919-820-5473
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is
intended only for the use of the intended recipient, and may also be
protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC
Sections 2510-2521. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the
sender, and delete the original message. Thank you.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Ken Williams
In the basic settings, I setup the Multi-Purpose Key to use Asterisk BLF
and assigned it the parking lot extension (201 in our case, 701 by
default iirc).  I then added hints in the extensions.conf for the
parking lot extensions:
 
exten = 201,hint,park:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exten = 201,1,Wait(1)
exten = 201,2,ParkedCall(201)

Of course in features.conf I've defined the context as parkedcalls
(context = parkedcalls).
 
Hope this helps, it took a lot of piecing together other examples to get
it to come together so let me know if you need more help.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?


Ken,
Just curious, how did you make the Granstream's lights light up when
someone is parked?


On 3/27/07, Ken Williams  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the
first 5 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever
parking lot extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used
the announce part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem
to find to disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.
 
Thanks for any help,
Ken

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Matt

So are you running BRIStuff for this to work?

On 3/27/07, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 In the basic settings, I setup the Multi-Purpose Key to use Asterisk BLF
and assigned it the parking lot extension (201 in our case, 701 by default
iirc).  I then added hints in the extensions.conf for the parking lot
extensions:

exten = 201,hint,park:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exten = 201,1,Wait(1)
exten = 201,2,ParkedCall(201)
Of course in features.conf I've defined the context as parkedcalls
(context = parkedcalls).

Hope this helps, it took a lot of piecing together other examples to get
it to come together so let me know if you need more help.

 --
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Matt
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:59 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?

Ken,
Just curious, how did you make the Granstream's lights light up when
someone is parked?

On 3/27/07, Ken Williams  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first 5
 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking lot
 extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the announce
 part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to find to disable
 the announce so the transfer happens faster.

 Thanks for any help,
 Ken

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Paul
Ken Williams wrote:

 We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first
 5 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking
 lot extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the
 announce part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to
 find to disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.
  
 Thanks for any help,
 Ken

If I send the announce to an invalid extension it still seems to park
the call fast enough. I suppose I could create an extension that just
answers and hangs up to get rid of the warning messages.






___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Paul
Paul wrote:

Ken Williams wrote:

  

We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first
5 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking
lot extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the
announce part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to
find to disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.
 
Thanks for any help,
Ken



If I send the announce to an invalid extension it still seems to park
the call fast enough. I suppose I could create an extension that just
answers and hangs up to get rid of the warning messages.
  

Okay, I am now specifying Local/parkannounce as the announce extension.
That extension answers and hangs up. The calls park and MOH starts
immediately.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Ken Williams
No, this is a pretty plain vanilla setup, never touched BRIStuff.  My
features.conf (which defines the parkandannounce app) looks like:
 
[general]
parkext = 200  ; What extension to dial to park
parkpos = 201-210  ; What extensions to park calls on.
These needs$
; numeric, as Asterisk starts from the
start po$
; and increments with one for the next
parked c$
context = parkedcalls  ; Which context parked calls are in
parkingtime = 75   ; Number of seconds a call can be parked
for




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:17 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?


So are you running BRIStuff for this to work?


On 3/27/07, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

In the basic settings, I setup the Multi-Purpose Key to use
Asterisk BLF and assigned it the parking lot extension (201 in our case,
701 by default iirc).  I then added hints in the extensions.conf for the
parking lot extensions:
 
exten = 201,hint,park:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exten = 201,1,Wait(1)
exten = 201,2,ParkedCall(201)

Of course in features.conf I've defined the context as
parkedcalls (context = parkedcalls).
 
Hope this helps, it took a lot of piecing together other
examples to get it to come together so let me know if you need more
help.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?



Ken,
Just curious, how did you make the Granstream's lights light up
when someone is parked?


On 3/27/07, Ken Williams  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons
to the first 5 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever
parking lot extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used
the announce part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem
to find to disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.
 
Thanks for any help,
Ken

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Ken Williams
The problem isn't on the outside phone, it's on the inside.  An outside
caller already gets MOH immediately, the problem comes in waiting for
the TRANSFER to complete.  What we're doing to park a call is hitting
TRNF on the GXP-2000 followed by 200 (the park extension).  The phone
then says 'TRANSFERRING' and waits 2-3 seconds before saying TRANSFER
SUCCESSFUL.  The time that it's waiting is exactly how long it takes the
system to say TWO ZERO ONE.  I'd like to disable the Announce part so it
just transfers.  

Hope that's a little clearer. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:31 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?

Paul wrote:

Ken Williams wrote:

  

We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first
5 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking 
lot extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the 
announce part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to

find to disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.
 
Thanks for any help,
Ken



If I send the announce to an invalid extension it still seems to park 
the call fast enough. I suppose I could create an extension that just 
answers and hangs up to get rid of the warning messages.
  

Okay, I am now specifying Local/parkannounce as the announce extension.
That extension answers and hangs up. The calls park and MOH starts
immediately.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Erased log files

2007-03-27 Thread Luis Claudio Santos

People,

I've erased the *messages* and *full *files in /var/log/asterisk/. I've
already created other files and changed the owner, etc, and permissions:

*-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk   0 Mar  2 16:01 event_log
-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk 1514385 Mar 27 18:15 full
-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk  396170 Mar 27 18:20 messages
-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk1102 Mar  3 18:08 queue_log
*
But, the asterisk is not writing in these files anymore.

Is there a solution?

Thanks.

--
Abraços
Luis Claudio
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Erased log files

2007-03-27 Thread Bruce Ferrell

logger reload at the CLI

Luis Claudio Santos wrote:

People,
 
I've erased the messages and full files in /var/log/asterisk/. I've 
already created other files and changed the owner, etc, and permissions:


-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk   0 Mar  2 16:01 event_log
-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk 1514385 Mar 27 18:15 full
-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk  396170 Mar 27 18:20 messages
-rw-r--r--  1 asterisk asterisk1102 Mar  3 18:08 queue_log
But, the asterisk is not writing in these files anymore.
 
Is there a solution?
 
Thanks.


--
Abraços
Luis Claudio
 





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Dave Fullerton wrote:
 To start a bunny trail, your try another motherboard comment made me
 wonder about this new VoiceBus technology mentioned on the new TDM800
 and TE120P cards. What exactly is it? Is is just a new PCI interface on
 the card? What makes it work so much better than the other cards?

It is exactly that; a different PCI interface that is far, far less
likely to experience PCI compatibility issues than the TigerJet
interface on the TDM400P and TE110P. In addition to that, recent driver
improvements in Zaptel have also solved many interrupt-related problems
even with the TDM400P and TE110P.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone

2007-03-27 Thread Ola Lidholm


On 27 mar 2007, at 15.15, Ray Wadkins wrote:

I looked at a call queue, but it didn't seem to work the way I  
want.  Agents need to log into the queue to get calls, seemingly.   
Of course, I only stopped on the topic for a short period.  with  
the meetme conference, anyone can answer the door from any phone by  
dialing the conference extension, just not open the door.


In queue.conf (or is it called queues.conf?) you can set up a call  
queue with all your phones already in it.
Which will mean that if you pass the incoming call to that queue all  
phones will be ringing until one person picks it up.


At my work we have it set up like that. And additionally, people can  
join or leave the call queue by dialing certain extensions on their  
phones, which can be convenient when people do not want to be disturbed.


I do not understand exactly how you mean your system works, how does  
the users know when someone is at the door? Since no phone is ringing  
it seems to me like a guessing game to know when they need to dial in  
to the meetme to open the door? Do you have free sight to the  
entrance door so that you can see if someone is already there?


/Ola




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ola Lidholm
Sent: Mon 3/26/2007 7:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone




On 26 mar 2007, at 22.17, Ray Wadkins wrote:


We have a doorphone device that's connected to our PBX.  Currently,
there's a special meetme conference that the phone connects to when
the visitor presses zero.  Users in the office can dial the meetme
conference and get connected.  The problem is that we can't send
DTMF signals to the door to open it, because the meetme app seems
to capture them.

I had the bright idea to set up a virtual extension that would
just ring, virtually.  Then we could use call pickup to snag the
call at an extension and be able to open the door.  Unfortunately,
I can't figure out how to get that to work.  Wait(30) and Answer
(3) don't seem to allow call pickup to snag the extension.

Any suggestions?


Hi Ray,

I can't really understand why you want to use a meetme conference?
Why not use a call queue instead?

/Ola Lidholm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

It would make more sense if you posted the musiconhold.conf file and
stated if you did or didn't install the asterisk_addons package with
mp3 support.

On 3/27/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





Hi All,



I have installed Asterisk 1.4.2 and have loaded ztdummy as I have no Digium
cards.  The problem I have is that MOH will not play.  It starts and then
stops.



asterisk*CLI zap show status

Description  Alarms IRQ
   bpviol CRC4

ZTDUMMY/1 1  UNCONFIGUR 0  0  0



I'm not sure if the above is correct.



Please help.



Thanks.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] ARI with * 1.4.2 won't display recordings

2007-03-27 Thread Richard Klingler

Evnin'

Now I tracked my problem down why ARI won't display most of
the recordings...

It write a recording for examples as:

1175031785-SIP-0615000995-0872a000.wav

But it writes to the field uniqieid into MySQL database as:

1175031779.16

WHen I overwrite the uniqueid field with the value from the
recording file, the recording is playable within ARI:

1175031785


Any idea why the uniqieid and the ID used for creating the
recording files are always different?



cheers
rick

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] vzaphfc installation...

2007-03-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:20:49AM +0200, Mauro Zanin wrote:
 Hi everybody,
 does anybody knows how to install and configure VZAPHFC?

Basically something of the sort of:

Copy the sources of vzaphfc as a subdirectory vzaphfc under the sources
of zaptel . 

Add to Makefile.linux26 the line:

  obj-m += vzaphfc/


(or get the zaptel/zaptel-source packages from Debian)

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p reliability

2007-03-27 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

Actually I think the additional wanpipe drivers are a major plus. For
PRI troubleshooting I even think there are tools that are not present
in Zaptel, or are much harder to setup (vs wanpipemon -g).

Commitment to multiple protocols, applications and platforms is also
another plus. Sangoma supports many configurations I doubt Digium ever
will.

On 3/27/07, Dave Fullerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


There are downsides to the A200 (which I have had very good luck with as
well and highly recommend, don't get me wrong). You have to install FXO
or FXS ports in pairs, you can't do 3 FXO and 1 FXS for example. The
other is having to manage one more set of drivers (wanpipe). Not a big
deal though and I've never had any problems doing so.

To start a bunny trail, your try another motherboard comment made me
wonder about this new VoiceBus technology mentioned on the new TDM800
and TE120P cards. What exactly is it? Is is just a new PCI interface on
the card? What makes it work so much better than the other cards?

-Dave


John Novack wrote:
 We have had much better success with the Sangoma A200
 Excellent support from Sangoma
 Works in all modern motherboards - no try another motherboard answers
 from support
 Expandable, if needed, to 24 ports
 Lower price per port, depending on your supplier.

 John Novack


 Joe Acquisto wrote:
 What are peoples experience with the reliability of the TDM400p.
 Specifically in the 2 FXO, 2 FXS configuration, which is the 022 (?)
 model.

 Is this board prone to random failures?

 joe a.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Jim Duda
Many times the speed of an inbound voice call changes.  It's similiar 
to playing a 33 LP at 45 speed.  Sometimes the voice becomes uneligible. 
 A speed change is the best way to describe it, seems like the voice 
packets are being played out too fast.


Can anyone explain what might cause this?  It doesn't always happen, and 
seem unpredictable.


Thanks,

Jim

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone vs. Grandstream BT101

2007-03-27 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

This is the simplest solution I can think of:
http://www.smarthome.com/5070cw.html

On 3/26/07, Jay Milk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Steve Totaro wrote:
 Just get a Grandstream ATA and a handset with no buttons.  So simple.
That doesn't really meet my needs -- I want to be able to dial-out, and
have the person on the other end simply be able to push a button to ring
the doorbell.  The doorbell button requirement stems from the eternal
hope that someday DHL drivers will be trained to push it just before or
after they slam-dunk that box marked fragile, so I can get this box of
broken computer parts out of the pouring rain when it arrives, and won't
have to file the insurance claim days later when I find the rain-soaked
cardboard blob near the culvert.

Sorry, I got sidetracked there.  What I mean is, I'd like to keep the
doorbell button so that Fedex and UPS drivers can continue to ring it
and leave when they deliver something -- I think having to pick up a
crusty, dirty receiver might be a deterrent even to those 99.9% of folks
who are better trained than a DHL driver.  Shoot, went there again.  No
I'm not bitter.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Couldn't load variables.txt?aldope=xxxxx

2007-03-27 Thread Carlos Jerónimo

HI!!!Sorry this post about FOP but it's important.

Ive installed asterisk and freepbx. the interface of FreePBX works
fine, but when i acesse FOP
(Flash Operator Panel) i get this error: Couldn't load
variables.txt?aldope=x 

I search in the google and see a sugestion to edit line
flash_dir=/var/www/html/panel/flash in file op_server.cfg.

Any Sugestion please?
--
Carlos Jerónimo
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

2007-03-27 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

On 3/26/07, Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

1. Is it possible to install several SIP softphones on the same PC,

Yes. You can even install for example two softphones for Windows, two
for Linux and two for MacOSX (two is an imaginary number you can have
six on Windows, 27 on Linux and none on Mac for example.



have them registered to the same Asterisk server and attribute to

each softphone

a specific extension, ringtones or call forwarding rules ?


yes, but why not use a phone with multiple lines Its liks saying you
can buy a Cisco hardphone with 10 lines but then only use 1 line on
each and buy 10 phones -- for the same person.



2. Is possible to do the same with SIP hardphones ?


A sip hardphone is nothing but specialized computer running special
OS and softphone. Besides the fact that one is hardware and the
other is software from a technical perspective is the same. So I
suppose your question is if there are hardphones with that sort of
software available and the answer is yes.



But what about several registrations from the same hardphone to the same
Asterisk server ?

It might be a simple way to allocate specific behaviour :
For instance, someone could be both seen as call center staff and post-sales
department member.

From dialplan design and maintenance perspective, do you think it would be
more simple to associate registration and business assignment ?



Think about this as an analogy. If the agent become the user ID then
why are you going to call the agent John also Bob and James?
That makes no sense. If a user is getting a call you have to route
that call somehow. You know the user wants post-sales support and you
have a list of agents that can handle post sales support. Why are you
going to reconfigure everything? So what if that user moves to a
different desk you need to configure that new phone to have an extra
line? If you for example know John uses agent login why not send the
call to John instead of his line. Am I making sense here?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

2007-03-27 Thread Salvatore Giudice


Sorry. My mistake. I was thinking of SER. You are quite right.

--
Salvatore Giudice
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
VoIP Security Training, LLC
http://VoIPSecurityTraining.com

848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #1676
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Phone: (702) 979-2906
 Fax: (212) 279-2906

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Bowyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:36 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-registration ?

On 27/03/07, Salvatore Giudice
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Asterisk can handle multiple registrations for the same account. Both
should
 ring when calls come in.

No it can't - the latest registration 'wins'. To achieve simutaneous
ringing of more than one phone (hard or soft), you need a SIP account
for each and an entry in the dialplan which rings both.

Peter
-- 
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora

On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Many times the speed of an inbound voice call changes.  It's similiar
to playing a 33 LP at 45 speed.  Sometimes the voice becomes uneligible.
 A speed change is the best way to describe it, seems like the voice
packets are being played out too fast.

Can anyone explain what might cause this?  It doesn't always happen, and
seem unpredictable.



This sounds like a timing issue.  Do you have zaptel cards installed
or ztdummy?  If zaptel cards, are you getting your timing from the
telco or providing your own?  I shut off the line that was providing
timing from the telco on another system (not asterisk) and all heck
broke loose.  I had called to cancel the line a few days earlier and
it took a couple days for them to cancel it, so basically had
forgotten about it.  Took me awhile to figure that one out.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Macro Dial - External DID

2007-03-27 Thread Forrest Beck

I am using the sample (slightly modified) macro for dialing phones. My
extensions are in the 2000 range.  Each extension has it's own
external DID.  Is there any way to have the macro look up the DID to
be used for the extension and set the DID as the callerid?  Maybe from
a flat file somewhere?  Or is there a better way to do this???

I know I can use callerid in sip.conf, but I only want the DID used
when the call goes external.

[macro-stdexten]
;
; Standard extension macro:
;   ${ARG1} - Extension  (we could have used ${MACRO_EXTEN} here as well
;   ${ARG2} - Device(s) to ring
;
exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG2},20)  ; Ring the interface, 20 seconds maximum
exten = s,2,Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS},1)  ; Jump based on status
(NOANSWER,BUSY,CHANUNAVAIL,CONGESTION,ANSWER)
exten = s-NOANSWER,1,Voicemail([EMAIL PROTECTED])  ; If
unavailable, send to voicemail w/ unavail announce
exten = s-NOANSWER,2,Goto(default,s,1)  ; If they press #, return to start
exten = s-BUSY,1,Voicemail([EMAIL PROTECTED])  ; If busy, send to
voicemail w/ busy announce
exten = s-BUSY,2,Goto(default,s,1)  ; If they press #, return to start
exten = _s-.,1,Goto(s-NOANSWER,1)  ; Treat anything else as no answer
exten = a,1,VoicemailMain(${ARG1})  ; If they press *, send the user
into VoicemailMain

[phones]
exten = _2XXX,1,Macro(stdexten,${EXTEN},SIP/${EXTEN})

DID example:
2001 = 5552871701
2002 = 5552871702
2003 = 5552871703

Thanks!

--
***
Forrest Beck
IAXTEL: 17002871718
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Jim Duda

Lacy,

I don't have any zaptel cards installed.  I do however have ztdummy 
installed.


Is there some tweaks to ztdummy which I might need?
Is there a special kernel setting which ztdummy requires?

Jim

Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:

On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Many times the speed of an inbound voice call changes.  It's similiar
to playing a 33 LP at 45 speed.  Sometimes the voice becomes uneligible.
 A speed change is the best way to describe it, seems like the voice
packets are being played out too fast.

Can anyone explain what might cause this?  It doesn't always happen, and
seem unpredictable.



This sounds like a timing issue.  Do you have zaptel cards installed
or ztdummy?  If zaptel cards, are you getting your timing from the
telco or providing your own?  I shut off the line that was providing
timing from the telco on another system (not asterisk) and all heck
broke loose.  I had called to cancel the line a few days earlier and
it took a couple days for them to cancel it, so basically had
forgotten about it.  Took me awhile to figure that one out.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora

On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I don't have any zaptel cards installed.  I do however have ztdummy
installed.


Hmm...  Not sure.  But this really sounds like ztdummy is not working
correctly.  Hopefully someone else can jump in here.  The only system
I've ever done without a zaptel card have been lab systems, and they
have worked as far as I can tell, with ztdummy.

WHat version of Asterisk and what version of zaptel are you running?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Jim Duda

Lacy,

I'm using asterisk 1.4.2 and zaptel 1.4.1.

I read the READMEs again.

I believe I need to change my kernel RTC to 1000HZ.
Also, I didn't have enhanced_real_time clock enabled, as such,
ztdummy wasn't loading properly.

I have rebuilt and started testing again.

Thanks for the replies!!

Jim

Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:

On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I don't have any zaptel cards installed.  I do however have ztdummy
installed.


Hmm...  Not sure.  But this really sounds like ztdummy is not working
correctly.  Hopefully someone else can jump in here.  The only system
I've ever done without a zaptel card have been lab systems, and they
have worked as far as I can tell, with ztdummy.

WHat version of Asterisk and what version of zaptel are you running?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Park No Announce?

2007-03-27 Thread Ken Williams
I couldn't find a switch, so I commented line 426 out of res_features.c and 
recompiled - instant transfer now on Grandstream phones.  Below is the line for 
future reference.
 
 ast_say_digits(peer, pu-parkingnum, , peer-language); 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ken Williams
Sent: Tue 3/27/2007 2:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?



The problem isn't on the outside phone, it's on the inside.  An outside
caller already gets MOH immediately, the problem comes in waiting for
the TRANSFER to complete.  What we're doing to park a call is hitting
TRNF on the GXP-2000 followed by 200 (the park extension).  The phone
then says 'TRANSFERRING' and waits 2-3 seconds before saying TRANSFER
SUCCESSFUL.  The time that it's waiting is exactly how long it takes the
system to say TWO ZERO ONE.  I'd like to disable the Announce part so it
just transfers. 

Hope that's a little clearer.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:31 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Park  No Announce?

Paul wrote:

Ken Williams wrote:

 

We're using Grandstream GXP-2000 with programmed buttons to the first
5 parking lot extensions.  When a call is parked, whichever parking
lot extension it's parked on lights up red.  We've never used the
announce part and I'm wondering if there's an option I can't seem to

find to disable the announce so the transfer happens faster.

Thanks for any help,
Ken
   


If I send the announce to an invalid extension it still seems to park
the call fast enough. I suppose I could create an extension that just
answers and hangs up to get rid of the warning messages.
 

Okay, I am now specifying Local/parkannounce as the announce extension.
That extension answers and hangs up. The calls park and MOH starts
immediately.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


winmail.dat___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Jim Duda

Lacy,

How I have this:

ztdummy 4424  0
rtc11156  1 ztdummy
zaptel178084  1 ztdummy
crc_ccitt   2016  1 zaptel

ztdummy is loaded, and * is running, however, I would have expected 
ztdummy to be used by at least something.  Does this look normal?


Jim




Jim Duda wrote:

Lacy,

I'm using asterisk 1.4.2 and zaptel 1.4.1.

I read the READMEs again.

I believe I need to change my kernel RTC to 1000HZ.
Also, I didn't have enhanced_real_time clock enabled, as such,
ztdummy wasn't loading properly.

I have rebuilt and started testing again.

Thanks for the replies!!

Jim

Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:

On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I don't have any zaptel cards installed.  I do however have ztdummy
installed.


Hmm...  Not sure.  But this really sounds like ztdummy is not working
correctly.  Hopefully someone else can jump in here.  The only system
I've ever done without a zaptel card have been lab systems, and they
have worked as far as I can tell, with ztdummy.

WHat version of Asterisk and what version of zaptel are you running?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Doorphone

2007-03-27 Thread Trevor Peirce

Ray Wadkins wrote:
I had the bright idea to set up a virtual extension that would just 
ring, virtually.  Then we could use call pickup to snag the call at an 
extension and be able to open the door.  Unfortunately, I can't figure 
out how to get that to work.  Wait(30) and Answer(3) don't seem to 
allow call pickup to snag the extension.  
 
Any suggestions?

Sure, try something like this:

[doorcom]
exten = s,1,Dial(Local/ringforever)

[ringforever]
exten = s,1,Wait(60)
exten = s,n,Playback(sorry-nobody-wants-to-let-you-in)
exten = s,n,Hangup


To answer just use call pickup.  As long as everything is SIP you should 
be just fine (I think I read somewhere that IAX doesn't have call pick up).


Not sure if the Local/ringforever is written quite right, but you get 
the idea here.


Good luck,
Trev
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora

On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

ztdummy 4424  0
rtc11156  1 ztdummy
zaptel178084  1 ztdummy
crc_ccitt   2016  1 zaptel



Ok, this is a dumb question, but what is that output from?

What distribution of Linux are you using?  I've never had to change
anything related to the kernel.  I use CentOS, though.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Inbound Voice Quality - Speed Change

2007-03-27 Thread Travis Schafer
Looks like output from the 'lsmod' command.


 Lacy Moore - Aspendora [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/27/2007 11:34 PM 
On 3/27/07, Jim Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ztdummy 4424  0
 rtc11156  1 ztdummy
 zaptel178084  1 ztdummy
 crc_ccitt   2016  1 zaptel


Ok, this is a dumb question, but what is that output from?

What distribution of Linux are you using?  I've never had to change
anything related to the kernel.  I use CentOS, though.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora

On 3/27/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have installed Asterisk 1.4.2 and have loaded ztdummy as I have no Digium
cards.  The problem I have is that MOH will not play.  It starts and then
stops.


If you rub your hand across the mouthpiece of the phone, does the music play?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] cisco 7905

2007-03-27 Thread Hermann Wecke

Khaled Chehab wrote:
How to configure cisco 7905 with asterisk ,if you please can send me 
step by step configuration steps .


This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to 
the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from

 disclosure belonging to Xplorium.


Sorry, can't help you because of this BS. If you want help, repost
without this crap.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Klaverstyn, David C
WOW that fixed it!  What an Idiot.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lacy Moore
- Aspendora
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2007 1:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

On 3/27/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have installed Asterisk 1.4.2 and have loaded ztdummy as I have no
Digium
 cards.  The problem I have is that MOH will not play.  It starts and
then
 stops.

If you rub your hand across the mouthpiece of the phone, does the music
play?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora

On 3/27/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

WOW that fixed it!  What an Idiot.


I was going somewhere with that, but never mind.  Good luck.

Maybe the idiot is the guy who posted no additional details of his
configuration, in particular, whether the CLI was showing music on
hold starting, and then stopping, or whether the music on hold process
was continuing but no sound.

If it was a timing issue, by rubbing your hand across the mouthpiece,
I would guess it is generating interupts for the timer to work and
music on hold works, until you stop rubbing it and it fades it out.
Hitting or tapping the mouthpiece produces the same outcome.

Or, it that doesn't produce anything, it could be a permissions
problem.  It could be something not configured correctly in the config
file.  It could be that you are using mp3s instead of native format,
as Andrew had asked about.

But, since I'm an idiot, what do I know?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Klaverstyn, David C
The cli shows:
-- Started music on hold, class 'jessica', on channel 'IAX2/205-3'
-- Stopped music on hold on IAX2/205-3

I am using MP3 but I also tried it with WAV and GSM with the same
result.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lacy Moore
- Aspendora
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2007 3:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

On 3/27/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 WOW that fixed it!  What an Idiot.

I was going somewhere with that, but never mind.  Good luck.

Maybe the idiot is the guy who posted no additional details of his
configuration, in particular, whether the CLI was showing music on
hold starting, and then stopping, or whether the music on hold process
was continuing but no sound.

If it was a timing issue, by rubbing your hand across the mouthpiece,
I would guess it is generating interupts for the timer to work and
music on hold works, until you stop rubbing it and it fades it out.
Hitting or tapping the mouthpiece produces the same outcome.

Or, it that doesn't produce anything, it could be a permissions
problem.  It could be something not configured correctly in the config
file.  It could be that you are using mp3s instead of native format,
as Andrew had asked about.

But, since I'm an idiot, what do I know?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora

On 3/28/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The cli shows:
   -- Started music on hold, class 'jessica', on channel 'IAX2/205-3'
   -- Stopped music on hold on IAX2/205-3


That rules out the timing.

I see this note in the config file:

; If you are not using autoload in modules.conf, then you
; must ensure that the format modules for any formats you wish
; to use are loaded _before_ res_musiconhold. If you do not do
; this, res_musiconhold will skip the files it is not able to
; understand when it loads.

Does that apply?  Also, I'm not sure if this still applies, but at one
time, you had to issue a restart command if you added any music files
for the Asterisk to see them.  A reload command wouldn't do it.  Have
you tried restart (not of the system, just Asterisk from cli).

Another thing you may or not be able to check...  what if you just put
the files in the default directory and in the default context?  Do
they work then?  This would eliminate some of the musiconhold config
options causing problems.  I guess along those lines do the default
music on hold files work?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Tom Lynn

Lacy, it appeared to me that he was calling himself an idiot.  Thanks for
some of the background on the issue, though.

On 3/27/07, Lacy Moore - Aspendora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 3/27/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 WOW that fixed it!  What an Idiot.

I was going somewhere with that, but never mind.  Good luck.

Maybe the idiot is the guy who posted no additional details of his
configuration, in particular, whether the CLI was showing music on
hold starting, and then stopping, or whether the music on hold process
was continuing but no sound.

If it was a timing issue, by rubbing your hand across the mouthpiece,
I would guess it is generating interupts for the timer to work and
music on hold works, until you stop rubbing it and it fades it out.
Hitting or tapping the mouthpiece produces the same outcome.

Or, it that doesn't produce anything, it could be a permissions
problem.  It could be something not configured correctly in the config
file.  It could be that you are using mp3s instead of native format,
as Andrew had asked about.

But, since I'm an idiot, what do I know?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

2007-03-27 Thread Klaverstyn, David C
I am using autoload and I have rebooted the server.  I have tried using
different files and a different location.  This is getting very
frustrating. 

I wish I knew what the problem was.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lacy Moore
- Aspendora
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2007 3:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy and MOH

On 3/28/07, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The cli shows:
-- Started music on hold, class 'jessica', on channel 'IAX2/205-3'
-- Stopped music on hold on IAX2/205-3

That rules out the timing.

I see this note in the config file:

; If you are not using autoload in modules.conf, then you
; must ensure that the format modules for any formats you wish
; to use are loaded _before_ res_musiconhold. If you do not do
; this, res_musiconhold will skip the files it is not able to
; understand when it loads.

Does that apply?  Also, I'm not sure if this still applies, but at one
time, you had to issue a restart command if you added any music files
for the Asterisk to see them.  A reload command wouldn't do it.  Have
you tried restart (not of the system, just Asterisk from cli).

Another thing you may or not be able to check...  what if you just put
the files in the default directory and in the default context?  Do
they work then?  This would eliminate some of the musiconhold config
options causing problems.  I guess along those lines do the default
music on hold files work?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users