is talking about a nearly trivial
single multiply or shift function.
DSP is more like dealing with quantum physics rather than Newtonian physics.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http
archives, and I
hate using the Forum software, so I can't help you there.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
audiophiles out of their money.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
for blowing up.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
.
And, IMHO, there will never be a Logitech TP 2. Perhaps a Sean's Garage
TP 2, if he hasn't gone off to spend his retirement surfing.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http
the physics.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
than 24.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
is so processed that lossless is not that important.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
doing for 5 or so years.
No arguments possible from the evil goons at the RIAA, I have the cd,
case, all that crap.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com
On 07/03/2010 09:10 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
On 04/07/10 00:59, Pat Farrell wrote:
No arguments possible from the evil goons at the RIAA, I have the cd,
case, all that crap.
...except that is technically not legal in the UK.
Well, here it is technocally illegal to talk about what goons
in any volume, and
was too computer for the audiophile purists, and too high priced for
consumers.
Suppose someone wanted to make a TP-2, it would be what percent better
than the initial TP, in what area would you put the engineering?
He's dead, Jim
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
of the parts. Its the engineering,
NRE, non-recurring engineering expense. The only way to lower the impact
of the NRE is to move more units.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http
accordingly..
Do you seriously think that replacing a $2 cap with a $50 cap will
greatly change the sound?
Does the term eye candy for rich people mean anything to you?
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles
On 07/09/2010 10:03 AM, michael123 wrote:
So, you say that the audio design ends at 200$?
No I am saying that if you expect significant improvements in audio
quality by changing a $1 cap with a $200 cap, you are drinking
All IMHO, YMMV, etc
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
Proper active speakers (not just speakers with amps inside them) are an
expensive proposition...
Yes, but IMHO, they are the future.
I don't think you save money, but the amp engineer can deliver what the
driver engineer wants, how, when, what flavor, etc.
--
Pat Farrell
http
' digital audio.
For sure, and putting a digital signal through a TT patch panel is going
to do wonderful things to the wave forms.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http
, but not a good
description of what actually happens.
There is no difference in sound quality, there is no difference in the
decompressed files. Its easy to test for yourself.
Any person who claims otherwise is blowing smoke.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
On 09/17/2010 02:46 PM, seanadams wrote:
I haven't read the review yet but if the touch is resolving 17 bits that
is probably the correct maximum capability of the DAC chip. All things
have a noise floor... it is not realistic to expect that
performance from a $300 device employing a
, you can also send balanced signals down a 1/4 TRS jack
(looks like a stereo headphone jack). This connection takes up less
space in a rack than XLR connections.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles
, whereas unbalanced are usually under 3
feet long, and get pretty wonky after 10 feet or so.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
not care. That folks won't pay for better quality.
Its a market thing, not education.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
, he who has
the gold rules.
There are lots in the industry responsible, but its not because the
engineers are uneducated.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http
. But too
many are mangled by marketing, idiot producers, etc.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
you think is the best place to sell used audiophile gear?
Thank
Pat
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
the one DAC, its not like I need a store.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
is important when the music room is also the living room.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
of the old
stuff gets sold. I'm even thinking of selling some of my 30+
microphones. I still have a pair of 70s vintage Large Advent speakers,
my 40 year old 35mm film darkroom, .
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
at audiophiles cost $1,000.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
On 12/30/2010 10:22 AM, konut wrote:
Glass has the potential to vibrate. I stick with wood.
The stuff that they use to make guitars and violins?
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
any signficant bits in the last 8 bits
of any 24 bit sample made from it. Those machines barely had 70 dB of SNR.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman
one of the first production Transporters. I was not in the beta
program.
I played with the knob the first days I had it. Its a cool technical
tour-de-force, dynamically programmable force feedback.
I've never touched the knob in the years since.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
still more crossovers, it becomes more impossible to keep
then phase correct.
Get a Quad or Maggie instead, no stinking crossover.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http
on frequency.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
, going to Interlochen Arts Camp, having private lessions
for 5+ years, etc. I know very well what the sound of a trumpet is in my
house.
Playing Winton Marsalis on my very nice stereo is not the same.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
love Lowthers and flee watt amps.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
canceled my subscription to The Absolute Sound in disgust, they
are right one thing. The goal of music reproduction is to sound like
un-amplified instruments and voices in real music halls.
There are no crossovers screwing up the phase with a real singer in a
real hall.
--
Pat Farrell
http
. But if your kid
calls mom or dad then you pick it out instantly. Everyone there
answers to mom or dad, but they are all listening to something specific.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles
to
the student.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
On 03/10/2011 02:26 PM, ralphpnj wrote:
And what does OBE stand for?
I always heard
Overtaken By Events
but in this case, perhaps
Obsoleted By Europeans
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles
effects if you use them), but the sound you hear depends on that plus
the way the guitarist plays it.
In the 60s, there was graffiti all over London saying Clapton is God
which might be a bit of an exaggeration, but the boy can play.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
for high accuracy in either
a studio or audiophile world. And its never going to meet the needs of
either a recording studio or a serious audiophile.
Look elsewhere.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles
of it, but it will not last 100,000 miles.
There is truth to the old can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear
but sometimes, a few tweaks can make a serious difference.
For me, stereo is about the music, not the gear, and I have no interest
in tweaks other than properly positioning my speakers. YMMV
--
Pat
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:35 -0700, mkozlows wrote:
The easiest way to do it would be with the following setup:
1. Analog out from SB to preamp
2. Digital out from SB to DAC, analog out from there to preamp
The DAC-1 has a volume control, so you can do level-matching just using
that.
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 10:08 -0700, mkozlows wrote:
pfarrell Wrote:
Sorry, this is neither blind nor realistic.
I'm at a loss as to how you are planning on doing it.
I'm not planning on doing anything
I said I don't see how to do a blind ABX test,
you said this is how and I said (or tried
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:13 +0200, Fabrice Rossi wrote:
Pat Farrell a écrit :
Of course both DVD-A and SACD were supposed to include DRM
and prevent copying, but as usual, that didn't happen.
Really?
yes. it really doesn't protect the data.
The high definition content of SACD
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:43 -0700, dean blackketter wrote:
On Jun 24, 2005, at 5:23 PM, Yannzola wrote:
How about a 75 ohm BNC SPDIF out?
I've seen these on some equipment, is there consensus (audiophiles,
consensus? HA!) on BNC vs. RCA for S/PDIF?
Ha is right.
My benchmark DAC-1 has
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 10:15 -0700, GordyInMA-USA wrote:
Is there an area on this or some other forum that discusses in non-techie
english,
I don't think such an answer is possible.
In more of the universe, power supplies are black boxes.
One kind of power comes in, and another kind flows out.
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 15:59 -0700, Jetlag wrote:
The Benchmark DAC1, April Music Stello DAC and the Bel Canto DAC2 are
on my maybe list so far.
I love my Benchmark DAC-1, I've got a SB1g.
Depending on budget, things like Larvy Engineering 44-96 Blue Series
is also in the range, it is about
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 02:30 -0700, Fifer wrote:
The April Music Stello combined DAC/Head-amp
The Grace 902 headphone amp/DAC,
a upgrade of the 901, is also getting good reviews.
Its a little more expensive compared to the Benchmark
--
Pat
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 04:24 -0700, cliveb wrote:
pfarrell Wrote:
I love my Benchmark DAC-1, I've got a SB1g.
Depending on budget, things like Larvy Engineering 44-96 Blue Series is
also in the range, it is about $1400.
Lucid DA9624 is under a grand.
Pat, your reply seems to suggest
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:44 -0500, Mitch Harding wrote:
On 7/19/05, Timbo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there - I hear what you say and agree that if space is an issue
(or bandwidth if you are wireless) then FLAC certainly adds
up to a good idea - but - in my case, in my system, with
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 18:27 -0500, Mitch Harding wrote:
However, without a true blind test being conducted, it seems more
likely to me to be a placebo effect.
Have you read up on the value of blind testing?
The reason I am concerned is because I want to know if there is such a
difference
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 08:14 -0700, m1abrams wrote:
But it is generally consider not a true ABX test if done solo.
Good science usually requires a double blind test, where both the
person doing the test and person administering the test do
not know what is real and what is a placebo.
It would
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:02 -0700, gdg wrote:
I want to disable the volume control on the SB2 and run the digital coac
output fixed. Can this be done or does one just turn it up and leave it
there?
There is a player setting to control this.
Home - player setting - audio - digital volume
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 17:24 -0700, gdg wrote:
I read from someone over at AudioAsylum that, while in a perfect world
FLAC is 100% accurate, in reality one runs a bvery/b slight risk of
audio degradation in the uncompressing process.
This tells me that one shouldn't bother to read AudioAsylum.
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:45 -0400, ron thigpen wrote:
These bits everyone is so fond of characterizing with pure perfection
are an abstraction.
I don't believe that I ever said that. Or at least I never intended to
even imply that we are at perfection.
Amplified and sent to an imperfect
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 15:04 -0400, ron thigpen wrote:
I was wondering if forum members suggest using the fixed digital output
or the variable digital output to get maximum sound quality with an
external DAC?
Fixed.
Topic's been done to death, but the upshot is that for perfect
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 01:08 -0700, ceejay wrote:
mwphoto Wrote:
I like the idea of a Dummy's guide to the Squeezebox - although why
it should just be aimed at audiophiles I'm not sure. Do we think that
audiophiles are more likely to be dummies? ;)
I personally find the for dummies titles at
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 19:56 -0700, WK446 wrote:
modifications to the Benchmark DAC1 from Empirical Audio or Reflection
Audio.
Wow, Empirical Audio has a base price of $1050 for their mod
to a $900 Benchmark, and additional options can add another grand.
Clearly I need to find a Santa.
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 12:56 -0700, aberdeencomponents wrote:
This aint no advertising,
I was just showing one of the many things Tact Hackers do to the SB2,
if you got to my site you see nothing about SB2.
Yeah, that did confuse me.
I do it for free. As far as parts goes , you just need a
consumer amp/receivers already have a DAC chip, used
for AC3 video, etc. So it is a natural match.
Sean and co are smart folks, they are probably a step ahead of us on
this, and surely can't drop any hints -- that would be very bad
business practice.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
) recording.
Using a transformer on a high frequency square-wave, as most
digital audio things are, seems strange to me. The before and after
shots of a square-wave through a transformer is standard in
oscilloscope 101. Or at least was when I was an undergraduate
years ago.
--
Pat Farrell
http
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 12:42 -0700, Deaf Cat wrote:
Arcam AVR200
Did you A/B using the SB2 as a DAC?
And did you try Toslink rather than coax? While
audiophiles sniff at toslink, it does eliminate
any chance of ground loops.
I've never heard (or even seen) an arcam, the reviews look
very good,
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 11:38 -0700, jazzfan wrote:
Wow - heavy duty replies... I just wanted to open a little discussion
and see what others thought about a nicer looking, somewhat improved,
SB2.
I am sure that Sean and company will invent a SB3 that is way cooler.
They have before, the SB2
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:58 -0700, mazurek wrote:
I am sending the output of the squeezebox to a behringer digital
equalizer to a benchmark dac. I'd like to make sure I am getting the
best possible quality.
The audiophile answer would be to not use the equalizer. The fewer
things in the
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 20:36 -0700, quadguy wrote:
The audiophile answer to not use an EQ applied more when EQ's were in
the analog domain with all their attendant filters and electronics -
when in purely digital mode all it does is alter the bitstream,
if you like it, use it. Use your ears,
of old sofa, etc.
--
Pat Farrell PRC recording studio
http://www.pfarrell.com/PRC
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 11:13 -0700, bec143 wrote:
The problem is, I still am plauged with frequent dropouts when playing
ripped music, whetehr it's AIFF, Apple lossless, or even just AAC
files. This never happens with the radio, and it makes listening to
the SB2 nearly impossible, since you
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 12:19 -0700, bec143 wrote:
I'll give it a shot, but need to find an ethernet cable that's close to
100ft long. The cable modem and airport are upstairs, whereas
everything else is is downstairs. Point-to-point the distance between
the SB2 and the airport is much closer.
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 10:08 -0700, seanadams wrote:
I haven't actually tested the KE - what I found was that the measured
performance of the E consistently exceeded the specs for both the E and
the KE. I'm guessing it's the same as CPUs, which can be marked with
different speed grades to
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:26 -0700, Dave D wrote:
Before I knew anything about FLAC, I ripped my CDs to MP3 (VBR, 160kbps
min). Since then, I've read on and on how much FLAC is used here and in
other forums. So I thought I would give it an audition before spending
all that time to re-rip
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:17 -0700, Dave D wrote:
I'm listening through my Labtec :) headphones,
Be warned, headphones have all sorts of non-linearities.
since they sound better
than my old Advent speakers (might get new speakers later this year).
Large Advents? I had four of them. Still
for people with home studios is
to not try to do critical mixing and mastering on headphones,
no matter how high quality. My mixing monitors are Mackie 824s,
which cost a bit over a grand, they were the cheapest ones
I could really hear critical differences on.
--
Pat Farrell PRC recording
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 10:51 -0700, cliveb wrote:
It's irrelevant for most rock albums, which have the standard 2-second
gap between tracks.
Ahem. There are literally thousands of rock albums where tracks segue;
some very famous ones being: Dark Side of the Moon, Abbey Road, Hounds
of Love,
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 12:15 -0700, bobreb wrote:
I'm looking for the highest quality option. Everything is currently in
WAV format -- that was the best quality option available for the
Audiotron device I'm switching from. Will probably re-rip to WMA
lossless. Before I do, I thought I'd ask
to buy some Squeezeboxen.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 20:09 -0700, Maditude wrote:
This is probably rather off-topic, but here goes:
A little? This is the slim audiophiles list.
Audiophiles hate home theater and everything it means.
I think, er
The home-theater system that came with a new tv recently purchased,
can't
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 14:46 -0700, GreenMan wrote:
1. Dac-ah from Poth Audio.
2. Scott Nixon TubeDAC+ (I like the look of the mod w/blue backlighting
on the tube.
3. Benchmark DAC1.
Any thoughts/opinions?
Buy it from someone who will let you return it if you don't like it.
These things are
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 11:00 -0700, x94blair3 wrote:
Thanks for the links. I can't imagine modding one of these myself, but
then again I can't imagine paying $265 for what was once a $30 piece of
electronics. Not that it wouldn't be better, it obviously would.
Hey, this is an audiophiles
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 21:44 -0400, Jacob Potter wrote:
The obvious thing is to get a proper headphone amp; from what I've
seen on Headwize, the Apheared 47 design is ideal for Grados (it's a
bit higher-end than the standard CMOY, but nothing too fancy). But
here on the SB2 list, the most
headphones.
YMMV
--
Pat Farrell PRC recording studio
http://www.pfarrell.com/PRC
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 08:51 -0700, Fifer wrote:
'headphone technology and quality have come a long way in 30 years'.
The point I was trying to make was that 30 years ago, the choice of
high quality headphones was fairly limited and what was available was
fairly expensive. There is a much wider
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 18:30 -0700, GreenMan wrote:
I took home a Sonic Frontiers SFD-1 MKII over the weekend and I swear I
couldn't hear any difference between it and the SB2's native dac. This
disappoints me. Either my ears aren't golden enough, there's a severe
weakness in my system, or a
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 21:16 -0700, seanadams wrote:
pfarrell Wrote:
What about just adding a tube preamp stage out of the SB2?
How about doing it in software?
Would software make the proper glow?
Of course, there is a lot of voodoo and wacko stuff about tubes and tube sound.
Not only in
desired. Of course, we'll also
have to change the green display to orange.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 09:30 -0700, bjackson wrote:
I would be suprised if you got any decent output out of the SB2 into a
HD600/650 load which are 300 ohms.
The standard headphone is 16-32-64 ohms, and the SB2 produces decent
power into them, but I don't think it has the voltage needed to
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 12:53 -0400, Pat Farrell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 09:30 -0700, bjackson wrote:
I would be suprised if you got any decent output out of the SB2 into a
HD600/650 load which are 300 ohms.
The standard headphone is 16-32-64 ohms, and the SB2 produces decent
power
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:29 -0700, seanadams wrote:
Our worthy competitor has recently removed support for the CD audio
format from their flagship product.
http://www.rokulabs.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4611start=0
Now, who said they couldn't innovate?
By all means, no more CD audio, it is so
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 06:27 -0700, Dave D wrote:
So, is there any other reason you can think of to do this, other than
to save the cost of another crystal?
Cost of a crystal. I doubt it. The switched to a cheaper integrated chip
(or chipset) and didn't care what the specs are. It actually
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 15:15 -0700, sleepysurf wrote:
Any recommendations for an Audiophile-grade source selector?
That is a preamp. There are passive preamps, but even they
cost a least a grand. And you'd add back multiple interconnects,
jacks and plugs and other bad stuff.
Alternatively, I'm
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 15:27 -0700, kenyonbm wrote:
Thank you for clearing that up, PhilNYC.
Several of the file formats are listed as (built in), AIFF, FLAC, MP3,
WAV and Windows Media. I take it that those formats are transmitted by
SlimServer natively.
In the FAQ on your slimserver it
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 17:29 -0700, kenyonbm wrote:
Thanks to you, Pfarrell, for your reply.
You're welcome.
When you say that the problem with Interent Radio sound is on the
streaming side, do you mean at the source or our end.
Well, I meant from where your line goes out of your house to
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:15 -0700, JohnnyLightOn wrote:
From an audiophile perspective, are the internals the same? Power
supply as well? I'm specifically interested in anything that has
changed in the hardware from the SB2.
See Sean's comment in the main list/forum.
Linear PS, I think.
--
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:02 -0700, tggreen wrote:
Well, I'm about to pull my hair out. Sox has a multi-band compander.
I've searched for several hours, and I can't find a single example
ANYWHERE that describes how to use the thing. I'm not even sure if a
multi-band compander will give me
Sammie, you have a few basic concepts a bit twisted.
Think about the name of the company. It is SlimDevices.
The name reflects a philosophy, the device does a very
few things very well.
For lots of things that we use it for, takes a real computer.
Not a new or fast one, but a computer. Most of
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 20:34 -0700, dwc wrote:
(whose speaker cable is made out of 14g computer power cords with the
ends cut off)
Last time I checked, 14 gauge wire was good for like 15 amps.
How loud do you listen? and how many watts of power does your amp put
out?
--
Pat
ron thigpen said:
In general, the bulk of these small active speakers seem to be targeted
to the studio monitoring market. That being the case, you may find a
better selection at distributors carrying pro sound equipment.
More precisely, the home studio (or semi-pro) monitoring market.
As in
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 11:27 -0800, seanadams wrote:
Patrick Dixon Wrote:
My point is exactly as Steinar says.I think this is one occasion where
we can have our cake and eat it ;-)
If someone has the time it would be REALLY helpful to get verification
that the new multiplier is correct.
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 12:26 -0800, ObjetDart wrote:
I've read the FAQ entry about this... I understand the issues with
having to convert AAC to FLAC and how FLAC requires a lot of wireless
bandwidth to send. I do not think that is the issue here,
Just a nit, FLAC requires more bandwidth than
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:47 -0800, seanadams wrote:
Patrick Dixon Wrote:
Good point. In fact, the SB2 DAC datasheet claims 100dB S/N (although
IIRC Sean said all the ones they tested measured better), whereas
quantisation noise would be at -144dB.
I've consistently measured the noise
1 - 100 of 1152 matches
Mail list logo
