Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for an .AppImage

On 10/11/18 12:53 PM, t...@hale.ee wrote: >> Looks like nixnote2 is already on the AUR and properly built from >> source, both stable and -git. >> A binary package ripped from an AppImage is probably the last thing >> you should be proposing... > > > I am the packager of the -git package and

Re: [aur-general] Critique my pkgbuild

On 10/10/18 9:34 AM, Ethan Rakoff wrote: > I have submitted a package called threemawebqt to the aur (mostly for > me, and some friends who use arch). It is a VERY simple thin client for > a webapp using Qt. This is my first pkgbuild from scratch (and my first > time working with Qt) so even

Re: [aur-general] Critique my pkgbuild

On 10/10/18 9:52 AM, Tinu Weber wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 15:48:31 +0200, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >>> makedepends=('make') >> >> `make` is present in `base-devel` thus shouldn't be a listed dependency. >> Unsure >> if its however worth listing it as it's the only needed

Re: [aur-general] Greetings and Documentation Proposals

On 10/8/18 11:44 PM, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > I can happily apply right now :) > > As I said earlier in the thread, I'm interested in raising the general > availability of packages for the average Archer. I'm also interested in > helping David out with some of the pro audio

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: FS#60333: namcap exits 0 when errors found (Task closed)

On 10/8/18 2:23 AM, Tom Hale wrote: > I noticed that even when namcap prints out errors, it still exits 0. > > I raised this at: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/60333 > > It was closed: > > Reason for closing: Not a bug > Additional comments about closing: namcap runs fine, so exiting with an

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for nixnote2-git [Finalising]

On 10/7/18 10:45 PM, Tom Hale wrote: > Thanks all for the great reviews. > > Thank you in particular to those who said WHY changes were suggested. I > now feel empowered to go on to package rambox-os. > > I believe I have incorporated all the feedback I received in the below. > > If I missed

Re: [aur-general] Greetings and Documentation Proposals

On 10/7/18 11:41 AM, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > Hello, fellow Archers. My name is Brett and I've been making PKGBUILDs > for the AUR for some time under the moniker 'Ainola'. A number of these > packages have been kindly pulled into [community] by David Runge. I've > since had a

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for nixnote2-git [Take 3]

On 10/7/18 5:32 AM, Tom Hale wrote: > Here's a version which builds from HEAD of the default branch. > > Comments please. Well, by convention you would post this inline instead of as an attachment since it is easier to review that way... > _pkgname=nixnote2 >

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

On 9/30/18 2:51 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the comments and explanations. > > Firstly, I wanna say that I am not asking for special treatment or > anything. Just wanted to discuss in detail what is going on. Secondly, a > few comments stood out to me (in no particular

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

On 9/29/18 11:13 PM, Mike Sampson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:32 PM Eli Schwartz via aur-general > wrote: >> Apparently libafterimage was not well-maintained... > > I think I was the maintainer of libafterimage. I'm not using Arch > Linux at the moment so have been v

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

On 9/29/18 3:57 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing to hopefully get some clarity on some packages that I > maintained in AUR (python-awkward-array, unuran), but have been overtaken > now in [community]. Also one other package that I have not maintained > 'libafterimage', but

Re: [aur-general] Spam account: jennyhannb

On 9/26/18 4:24 AM, WorMzy Tykashi via aur-general wrote: > Hi TUs, there's another spam account making the rounds: > https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jennyhannb/ Fixed -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Notification upon requests

On 9/13/18 6:46 AM, Einhard Leichtfuß wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed due to a comment on the package's web page that a package > I co-maintain [0] was requested to be deleted (due to being taken into > [community]). > > I'd have expected to get an e-mail when such a request is made, however > I

Re: [aur-general] IJulia and Julia library/module packages

On 9/2/18 4:33 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote: > Thanks Eli. :) > > On 02/09/2018 17:42, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> - declaring a "custom" license when it is in fact MIT > > Hmm... while the GitHub page > (https://github.com/JuliaLang/IJulia.j

Re: [aur-general] IJulia and Julia library/module packages

On 9/2/18 1:13 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote: > I'm also interested in any general PKGBUILD feedback, including any > depends which should be makedepends or checkdepends. If you find an easy > way to tell what should be what then I'm all ears! The things which immediately jumped out at me were:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Chih-Hsuan Yen

On 8/30/18 11:20 AM, Felix Yan via aur-general wrote: > On 8/23/18 4:22 PM, Felix Yan wrote: >> I'm starting the vote while Chih-Hsuan work on the Elint :) >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=108 > > Voting period is over, and the results are in! > > Yes No Abstain Total

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Chih-Hsuan Yen

On 8/26/18 10:55 PM, Chih-Hsuan Yen wrote: >> android-sdk-cmake: >> - kind of a small thing since it doesn't support i686 in any way, but >> arch-specific sources should be source_x86_64 >> - what is the utility of android's specific build artifacts for some >> random cmake release -- why

Re: [aur-general] Blobs in package

On 8/26/18 2:20 PM, Tucker Boniface wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hey all, I am the maintainer of the acroread package on the aur. As you > might know, if you use that program, it fails to run with newer versions > of harfbuzz and glib. So, as suggested by users

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Chih-Hsuan Yen

On 8/15/18 9:10 AM, Chih-Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > My name is Chih-Hsuan Yen. I'm also known as yan12125. > > I am applying to be a Trusted User with Felix Yan's sponsorship. > > I'm currently a PhD student in Taiwan. My Linux journey started when I > met Ubuntu in 2011.

Re: [aur-general] Weird notification about papirus-filezilla-themes-git package ownership

On 8/19/18 11:25 PM, Mohammadreza Abdollahzadeh via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > I got a message from AUR notification system about papirus-filezilla- > themes-git [1] package being disowned by some user named Handel [2], > but I am sole maintainer and submitter [3] of this package and no one > else

Re: [aur-general] Wrong ownership notification

On 8/10/18 5:21 PM, Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 10:47:02, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 8/10/18 4:44 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: >> [...] >>> However, the package never was orphaned, and at least in the AUR >>&

Re: [aur-general] Wrong ownership notification

On 8/10/18 4:44 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hi, > > I just got this mail (20180810075103.49c2e2b...@luna.archlinux.org) > about a package I'm maintaining: > > - Forwarded message from not...@aur.archlinux.org - > > Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:51:03 + (UTC) > From:

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 08/06/2018 04:20 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > The results are in... > > Yes: 29 > No: 3 > Abstain: 8 > Total: 40 > Particiaption: 83.33% > > Congratulations Santiago, you've got accepted as Trusted User. Welcome > on board. Welcome to the team, sangy. :) I've upgraded

Re: [aur-general] Keras circular dependency resolution

On 07/30/2018 11:36 PM, Robby Stokoe via aur-general wrote: > Keras recently moved two of its submodules to separate > modules---keras-applications, and keras-preprocessing [1]. These also > import keras and will not work without it, nor will keras work without > those submodules. Currently the

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/30/2018 05:34 AM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > Hi Eli, > Ehm no? According to our bylaws: > "Following the announcement, standard voting procedure commences with a > discussion period of 5 days, a quorum of 66%, and a voting period of 7 > days."[1] > > Santiago wrote his

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/28/2018 11:57 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my >> application, >> although I'd like to thank so many people for

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/22/2018 03:35 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my application, > although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance > and counsel in all-things-Arch*. Apologies

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 07/24/2018 04:05 PM, Dan Printzell wrote: > On July 17, 2018 8:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: >> On July 12, 2018 7:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: >>> I confirm my sponsorship. >>> >>> Let the discussion period begin! :) >> >> The discussion period is now over. Let the voting period begin! >> >> TUs

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/22/2018 03:35 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: sangy: dude, we know you're cool and all. No need to prove your creds by hacking shibumi so you can send his confirmation half a minute before your your

Re: [aur-general] python traceback on git push

On 07/19/2018 12:11 PM, Georg wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated a few packages and ran into an issue with the AUR: Yes, as mentioned in https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-July/034171.html -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] Spam account Hard_Work23

On 07/18/2018 04:09 PM, Beej Jorgensen wrote: > Comment here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/inform/ Fixed. Also in the general sense, this feature request for the AUR would be good to have a resolution for: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51319 -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted

Re: [aur-general] Attempting to update upwork-beta, and hit a head-scratcher

On 07/16/2018 03:52 PM, Shane Simmons via aur-general wrote: > Running into the error and not knowing the solution on my own > and not being willing to hunt down the problem but rather posting to > aur.archlinux.org in hopes of some guidance from fellow users was surely my > sign that I wasn't

Re: [aur-general] Attempting to update upwork-beta, and hit a head-scratcher

On 07/16/2018 03:19 PM, Shane Simmons via aur-general wrote: > If anyone cares to review the comments, yes, I posted on the git repo, but > only because of the admonishment that AUR isn't the place to post bugs on > aurman. Or, you could review the comments if they weren't deleted. Part > of

Re: [aur-general] Attempting to update upwork-beta, and hit a head-scratcher

On 07/16/2018 01:47 PM, Shane Simmons via aur-requests wrote: > I never received any kind of notification that my account was > suspended, or why. As far as I can recall, my best guess would be > that it was because I had stupidly published a bug comment to the > aurman AUR page and was harshly

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 07/13/2018 10:11 AM, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > Hey, > > First of all I just want to say that I have 58 packages on AUR and most > of the PKGBUILDs (written by me) were written before I knew some of > this. I tried to update most of them but as it's a really monotonous > task, I

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 07/12/2018 01:47 PM, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Filipe Laíns. > You might also know me by my alias, FFY00. > > I am applying to be a Trusted User with Dan Printzell's (Wild) sponsorship. It's always nice to see people eager to contribute more, good luck! >

Re: [aur-general] No translation file found for domain: 'aurweb'

On 07/11/2018 11:38 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hey, > > FYI, I just got this while pushing a package: > > remote: Traceback (most recent call last): > remote: File "/usr/bin/aurweb-notify", line 11, in > remote: load_entry_point('aurweb==4.7.0', 'console_scripts', > 'aurweb-notify')() >

Re: [aur-general] acroread package compromised

On 07/08/2018 08:53 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 14:02:15 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote: >> Needlessly to say I didn't install it. Still just thought I'd mention >> it. > > FWIW > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/mirrorlist?h=packages/pacman-mirrorlist >

Re: [aur-general] acroread package compromised

On 07/08/2018 01:54 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 07/08/2018 01:48 AM, Queen Wenceslas via aur-general wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The acroread AUR package appears to have been compromised: look at >> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=acroread= >> b3fec9f2f16703c2dae9e793f75ad6e0d98509bc

Re: [aur-general] acroread package compromised

On 07/08/2018 01:48 AM, Queen Wenceslas via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > The acroread AUR package appears to have been compromised: look at > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=acroread= > b3fec9f2f16703c2dae9e793f75ad6e0d98509bc > (and in particular that curl|bash line!). Not

Re: [aur-general] pkgrel - Is it correct that some "fixes" aren't "fixes"?

On 06/22/2018 01:33 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Moving a package from AUR to Community or vice versa also doesn't > change the content. I guess the pkgrel should inform about each change > done to a package providing the same pkgver. That's a change to the built package, which merits a pkgrel. Not

Re: [aur-general] Request deletion of python-django2

On 06/06/2018 09:07 AM, Daniel Moch wrote: > Since python-django has moved to Django 2, I’d like to request that > python-django2 be deleted from the AUR. > > Thanks. > > Daniel Moch > dan...@danielmoch.com > https://djmo.ch > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-django2 Package

Re: [aur-general] Packaging all CRAN packages for R

On 05/27/2018 12:15 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 05/27/2018 11:25 AM, Alex Branham wrote: >>> No, I assume that all cran packages are ELF executable code, unlike how >>> ruby or python can be interpreted scripts marked as "any". >> >> R packages do not usually (ever? need to check...) produce

Re: [aur-general] Packaging all CRAN packages for R

On 05/27/2018 11:25 AM, Alex Branham wrote: >> No, I assume that all cran packages are ELF executable code, unlike how >> ruby or python can be interpreted scripts marked as "any". > > R packages do not usually (ever? need to check...) produce executable > files. R CMD INSTALL copies over the

Re: [aur-general] Packaging all CRAN packages for R

On 05/27/2018 10:03 AM, Alex Branham wrote: >> I doubt anyone is just looking randomly to see which R packages are >> available, but if they are, the most effective way would be to download >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.gz and use regular expressions to >> find packages matching the

Re: [aur-general] Packaging all CRAN packages for R

On 05/26/2018 12:04 PM, Alex Branham via aur-general wrote: > Hi all - > > I'd like to use pacman to manage R packages, similar to how you can for > other languages (e.g. the python packages are all named python-*). There > are some packages available already, but not many (I count about 130 >

Re: [aur-general] Packaging all CRAN packages for R

On 05/26/2018 08:37 PM, Ista Zahn via aur-general wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for doing this. However, it seems your script does not > correctly specify system dependencies, which IMO is the main benefit > of using pacman instead of install.packages. For example, the sf > package should depend

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] upgpkg: qutebrowser 1.3.0-1

On 05/22/2018 01:44 AM, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > Sorry for the awfully long delay. > > The patch looks good to me. > I haven't much time for Arch these days, so if any of the developers / > trusted users is willing to apply and test it, please go ahead :) Updating to use

Re: [aur-general] Basilisk pkgbuild is facing a trademark violation?

On 05/22/2018 12:37 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > What these jokers don't seem to get is that there is NO packages involved > here. > There is nothing here that violates the license as there is no redistribution > at all. Moot point, move on and whine somewhere else. Yes, it's quite

Re: [aur-general] Basilisk pkgbuild is facing a trademark violation?

On 05/19/2018 04:41 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > Oh dear.. the behaviour of these palemoon people is so ridiculous and > rude. I suggest we support openBSD and just delete the package. > If they don't want users they don't get any. > > Their browser isn't 'that' good at all...

Re: [aur-general] Basilisk pkgbuild is facing a trademark violation?

On 05/19/2018 01:23 PM, Fabio Loli via aur-general wrote: > Mattatobin, of which you can read here > > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > Have made this (edited) comment in the AUR webpage asking for removal > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/basilisk > ​​​ >     You

Re: [aur-general] Advice needed on bundling a specific Python library

On 05/15/2018 02:27 AM, brent s. wrote: > The "user-friendly" way is to create a second package, e.g. > python-wxpython-400b2 or something, and make that a dependency. The > issue there is it is a strict requirement of the AUR that you not > reproduce any packages already in the official

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of discord-updater{,-canary}?

On 05/09/2018 08:29 PM, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: > discord-updater is quite a confusing package to me. I'm not sure is I > should file a deletion request for it. > > When discord needs an update it will refuse to start until it is > updated. This package appears to be designed to

Re: [aur-general] Taking over Discord-PTB

On 05/01/2018 02:38 AM, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: > Hi, a week ago i submitted an orphan request for Discord-PTB > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/discord-ptb/. It finally got > accepted but the co-maintainer 'discordapp' got set as the maintainer > so I can not adopt this package.

Re: [aur-general] Renaming xiccd to colord-xiccd

On 04/25/2018 05:53 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > I want to propose this > . > > > Alberto No. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] git package policy

On 04/18/2018 05:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if I'm too picky. > > Each time a new git commit is available, the pkgver of > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-macos-sierra-archers-git/ > gets increased, while nothing else changes. > > IMO it should stay untouched

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On 04/08/2018 07:49 AM, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > On 08.04.2018 05:01, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> If you're really afraid of someone running as either your user, or some >> user with the power to hijack your SSH session, while you're trying to &g

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On 04/08/2018 03:29 AM, Albert Graef via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general > <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: >> Explicitly contrary to the PKGBUILD spec; if pkgbase is unset, makepkg >> sets it from the first element of

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On 04/06/2018 07:12 AM, LoneVVolf wrote: > Although SRCINFO does have pkgbase=llvm35 in it, that's not in the > PKGBUILD. I doubt that's the cause of the issue, but try adding pkgbase > explicitly to PKGBUILD. Explicitly contrary to the PKGBUILD spec; if pkgbase is unset, makepkg sets it from the

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On 04/07/2018 07:55 AM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On April 7, 2018 8:23:08 AM GMT+02:00, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general > wrote: >> >> To perform the complete operation on soyuz, we need to forward the >> gpg-socket (and the SSH socket if different) to

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 04/05/2018 08:19 AM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > It's even easier to forgot that Arch users community is unpaid and > passionate as well and throw their work out of the window just because > you can. Did AUR maintainer benefited from uploading his package there? > Not at all. They

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 04/04/2018 01:05 PM, alrii via aur-general wrote: > AUR is like the wild west. Anyone can upload any packages even if it is > already exist. They sure can, and we can delete the package -- and the user with it. ... The dnscrypt-proxy-go-git is pretty obviously a duplicate of

Re: [aur-general] Password Recovery

On 03/15/2018 07:23 AM, Alexey Andreyev wrote: > thank you for fast responce! :) > oh, sorry, so there's a typo in gmail domain, that's why I've never received > recovery emails :( > I still have access to yetanotherandre...@gmail.com though (checked twice, no > typos right now) > Would be great

Re: [aur-general] Password Recovery

On 03/15/2018 06:28 AM, Alexey Andreyev via aur-general wrote: > Hello! I've lost my password for aa13q user. No replys about how to restore. > Any chances to get new account? > > I want to contribute to anbox-git and dbus-cpp with patches: >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/07/2018 04:16 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Discussion period is over, time to cast your votes, everyone! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=105 The voting period is over and the results are in! Yes No Abstain Total Voted Participation 23 8 14 45

Re: [aur-general] Wrong package version and more wrong attributes displayed

On 03/09/2018 03:26 AM, Mikael Blomstrand via aur-general wrote: > A tip is to add something like this to .git/hooks/pre-commit in your local > repo: > ``` > makepkg --printsrcinfo > /tmp/.SRCINFO > diff -q .SRCINFO /tmp/.SRCINFO > ``` > > git will then stop you from committing when .SRCINFO

Re: [aur-general] Wrong package version and more wrong attributes displayed

On 03/09/2018 02:00 AM, Sebastian Lau via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I've updated my package [0][1], but the web form is displaying the > update with the old version and old attributes (i.e. I've updated to > v2.1.0-1 and it is displayed as a new v2.0.0-2 version, which is a bug > in the web

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/07/2018 05:29 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:21:39PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 03/07/2018 05:15 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >>>> Eli Schwartz via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> hat

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/07/2018 05:15 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> Eli Schwartz via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> hat am 7. März 2018 >> um 22:16 geschrieben: >> >> Discussion period is over, time to cast your votes, everyone! >> >> https://aur.archl

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 11:50 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 03/02/2018 11:34 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> Interestingly enough, the signature went bad after transit. >> This message should verify fine. >> >> Regards, >> Rob >> >> On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/03/2018 05:50 PM, Nico via aur-general wrote: >> After becoming a TU, I'd like to look into promoting a couple of >> packages from the AUR over time, including but not limited to >> `rutorrent`, `psensor`, `glava` (currently `glava-git`, waiting for >> tagged releases), `gtkhash`, `streem`,

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#10789] Merge Request for remarkable-webkit2gtk

On 03/03/2018 07:22 PM, Mikael Blomstrand via aur-general wrote: > I just made a merge-request for a package I maintain. But I'm curious > about what this actually means in practice when it's merged. > > Will current users be notified in some way? Will they be redirected to > the new package? Or

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 02:09 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> - /usr/bin/indicator-sysmonitor invokes stuff and imports py files >> provided in usr/lib. This can result in untracked file creations >> if the application is run as root. cache files should be created >> before packaging, but

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 11:34 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Interestingly enough, the signature went bad after transit. > This message should verify fine. > > Regards, > Rob > > On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/21/2018 07:06 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Anyway, the voting period has now officially begun, so cast your votes > everyone! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=104 Voting period is over, and the results are in! Yes No Abstain Total Voted Participation 23 7 8

Re: [aur-general] Go package dependencies

> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: >> Actually there is no strict rule that base must be installed, its just a >> strong recommendation. While most systems would be quite useless without >> having glibc, its still a first level

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

On 02/22/2018 12:30 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > On 02/22/2018 10:42 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 02/22/2018 12:09 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: >>>>> pkgdesc="An extensible & universal comment vim-plugin that also >>>>> handles embedd

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

On 02/22/2018 12:12 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > On 02/22/2018 08:16 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: >> Naming scheme for vim plug-ins is always the other way around, vim-something >> not something-vim. >> Always prefix them with vim. >> >> Cheers >> Levente >> > > I wasn't aware of

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

On 02/22/2018 12:09 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: >>> pkgdesc="An extensible & universal comment vim-plugin that also >>> handles embedded filetypes" >> >> Is this a wrapping issue or is this really 2 lines? > No, but is there a problem with multiline description? Curious what you think the utility

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:30 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > On 02/12/2018 06:52 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> Brad, please create a new AUR account, as you will need one to interact >> with the AUR for various TU duties if you are re-elected. (This is >> indep

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

On 02/14/2018 10:19 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > It's disappointing how everyone shifts the blame towards and > ridicules upstream, rather than respect their wishes regarding the > _packaging of their own code_. Those are practices that remind of > certain other distributions. But

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

On 02/14/2018 09:09 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> Doug Newgard via aur-general hat am 14. >> Februar 2018 um 14:33 geschrieben: >> >> Getting feedback on the code doesn't have much do to with the >> existence of this package. Two totally different issues. >

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 05:04 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Turns out that since my application, Antonio Rojas has stepped up to the > plate and updated MATE to version 1.20.0, so props to him! The whole > group is still orphaned though, so I would plan on pushing out future > updates when they

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:30 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Per Eli's email, I have gone ahead and created a new AUR account under > the alias "cesura" (my standard nick for the past few years). For > clarity's sake, I've also made my bugtracker account under the same > name. Based on the BBS

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 04:36 AM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > Hello everybody, > I kind of feel uncomfortable with this. I think that somebody who has > resigned, is not able to sign his mails and seems to ignore requests of > doing so, should apply over the normal way like all others do.

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 02:28 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Do you still have access to your archweb account? If so, you could > update that with your GPG key/new email address and post a confirmation > email signed with that key to this thread. :D > > > I don't believe Archweb was even active

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/11/2018 02:54 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: >> * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied >> with >> in 2010. [1] >> * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or >> the >> 2010 application, as to remove doubts. >> * The "itsbrad212"

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 02/09/2018 07:02 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: >>> On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: Note: If possible

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/09/2018 01:00 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post > as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on almost > 7 years later, I'm still an avid Arch user, and have struck a balance > in my

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On 02/08/2018 10:45 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:44:27PM -0200, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: >> Hello, >> >> DDNet is a very fun sidescrolling game, similar to Teeworlds (DDNet is >> actually a mod of Teeworlds). Since Teeworlds's development is very >> slow and

Re: [aur-general] aur-out-of-date: determine out-of-date AUR packages w.r.t. upstream

On 02/01/2018 02:56 PM, Michael Kogan wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't know Go and in general have too little programming > skills and experience to propose any code modifications. But I have an > idea: What about introducing some variables which the package maintainers > would put into their

Re: [aur-general] aur-out-of-date: determine out-of-date AUR packages w.r.t. upstream

On 02/01/2018 11:08 AM, Simon Legner via aur-general wrote: > Hi aur-general, > > as a maintainer of fifty-something AUR packages I found it difficult > to keep track of new upstream versions. I would subscribe to various > RSS feeds to keep track of some. > > Recently, I sat down and wrote a

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/24/2018 11:18 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 01/23/2018 12:54 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >>> Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the >>> Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 01/26/2018 04:23 PM, Ivy Foster wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > be my sponsor. It is great to see you take the plunge, I wish you the best of luck! > Arch has always been a rewarding community to contribute to, and I > figure

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/23/2018 12:54 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the >> Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" >> >> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz >> --- >> >> Handy link to

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

On 01/24/2018 05:32 AM, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: > Thank you for the comments. > Indeed I didn't try to use "namcap" to catch most of the comments. Now > I did and sorry about that. > > > Looking deeper at the resutls, I found another issue, which I don't > know which is

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

On 01/23/2018 04:59 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: > Hello all > > This is my first attempt to create a valid PKGBUILD file for Arch Linux. > It is about the missing amiwm window manager. > > Please tell me what you think In addition to the other comments, > package() { >

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/23/2018 02:16 PM, Balló György via aur-general wrote: >> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for >> grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted? > > Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account > or do anything other than resolving

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the > Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" > > Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz > --- > > Handy link to context and surrounding discussion: > >

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/21/2018 04:19 PM, Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:40:43, Xyne wrote: >> On 2018-01-21 10:04 +0100 >> Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: >> >>> So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the >>> "OR") altogether? >> >> I made no

<    1   2   3   4   5   >