: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Kruyssen
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in
Australia.'
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
I am dead against funding international teams out
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of harry
medlicott
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 4:54 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
Our experience at Lake Keepit is that with a bit of an effort on the part
of instructors we get
On 16/10/2008, at 4:24 PM, harry medlicott wrote:
Our experience at Lake Keepit is that with a bit of an effort on
the part of instructors we get a quite reasonable conversion rate
from AEFs. We also need the money. Also where would our new members
come from if it wasn't through
Some clubs would have bought a few books prior to the price rise forward
thinking.
More power to the RAA enjoying flying the Jabiru 230 :)
Mal
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details,
ed at $150 and the club is still kept
busy doing flights.
K
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:02:40 +1000
Subject: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
AEF’s are a
main source of revenue for some clubs in bo
ts.
K
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:02:40 +1000
Subject: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
AEF's are a
main source of revenue for some clubs in both dollars and attracting
n
At SCGC we have success with 5 and 10 flight packages. We find some
AEFs take the 5 flight package as they see better value.
I agree, in regards to the target market problem. There are "samplers"
who will never join anything.
I also find it funny reading Golf Australia where they are
AEF's are a main source of revenue for some clubs in both dollars and
attracting new members. This is a blatant grab for club dollars by GFA,
taking revenue straight out of the clubs.
In small clubs the cost of operating will most likely be in the red and are
being propped up by donations
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:02:40
+1000Subject: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
AEF’s are a main source of revenue for some clubs in both dollars and
attracting new members. This is a blatant grab for club dollars by GFA, taking
revenue straight out
@lists.internode.on.net
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:02:40 +1000
Subject: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
AEF's are a main source of revenue for some clubs in both dollars and
attracting new members. This is a blatant grab for club dollars by GFA,
taking revenue straight out of the clubs.
In small
for the experience only and
will pay whatever is asked, I have seen flights charged at $150 and
the club is still kept busy doing flights.
K
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:02:40 +1000
Subject: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
Dear all,
I have been watching this topic with interest as I wrote to the GFA on
behalf of Renmark Gliding Club committee for clarification when the
(one sentence) letter was sent out "explaining" the increases.
Regardless of whether AEF charges should increase or not, the
annual membership
I am not sure whether we should or not support overseas teams, but I would like
to argue against the reasoning here - mainly that you claim there is no benefit
to individual members.
If you used that argument then we would not be paying tax. Or in a club sense,
as a private owner I should pay
in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
Dear all,
I have been watching this topic with interest as I wrote to the GFA on
behalf of Renmark Gliding Club committee for clarification when the (one
sentence) letter was sent out explaining the increases.
Regardless
Terry,
no idea on the break down, and frankly I don't care.
I know that there is a proportion of insurance to cover me as an
instructor against a personal claim from the passenger (or their
estate if I do a good enough job of messing up). This is insurance
that a) I doubt I could actually
Some very good points Scott, but please don't compare essential
services such as health care with a pilot wanting to enter an overseas
competition. I was not arguing about any other service paid by clubs
which may not be used by all - all of these clearly benefit the club as
a whole. I
October 2008
1:35 PM
To: Discussion of
issues relating
to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re:
[Aus-soaring] AEF
Charges - $20 to GFA
Dear all,
I have been watching this topic with interest as I wrote to the GFA on
behalf
of Renmark Gliding Club committee for clarification when the (one
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Gage
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 1:56 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
Terry,
no idea on the break down, and frankly I don't care.
I know that there is a proportion
to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
Terry,
no idea on the break down, and frankly I don't care.
I know that there is a proportion of insurance to cover me as an
instructor against a personal claim from the passenger (or their
estate if I do a good enough
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
However, such third party cover on the glider insurance now usually has
a $250,000 excess, as they expect the GFA BBL to cough up before they do.
John G.
--
I am using the free version
was the
catchcry of the American War of Independence,
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Kevin McGowan
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA
Lets get real here, it is a well
21 matches
Mail list logo
