Yeah bit of a dammed if you do, dammed if you don't type situation.
On 8/10/2017 4:11 PM, Peter Tiggerdine wrote:
disagree.
Outside of business hours costs more with limited staff around to
assist. They're doing you a favour by doing this because if your PSU
fails on server, you'll have time
disagree.
Outside of business hours costs more with limited staff around to
assist. They're doing you a favour by doing this because if your PSU
fails on server, you'll have time raise tickets with vendor and get
same day resolution.
Regards,
Peter Tiggerdine
GPG Fingerprint: 2A3F EA19 F6C2 93
Hi James,
A quick Google tells me APC ATS are break before make, so that is certainly
not the defining feature of an ATS vs. STS.
For cost effective provision of a 'C feed' in racks to catch those pesky
single corded devices you just can't live without I see no reason at all to
go to the expense
Yes but the wording was;
“However, some works are required to happen from time to time by law and one of
those activities is a de-energisation and inspection of each of our major
switchboards”
I have never heard of a law that requires de-energisation of a board for
inspection. Our electricians
I also am unaware of such a law. Simon, can you advise?
I'm told in QLD that live works are not permitted, but I am in SA so I have
not really bothered too much to check if that is hearsay or true.
On Thursday, 10 August 2017, Jared Hirst <
jared.hi...@serversaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
On 8/10/2017 2:47 PM, ausnog-requ...@lists.ausnog.net wrote:
Maybe it could be helpful to the Ausnog list to point us to that law you refer
too?
As I personally have never heard or seen this done in any DC in Australia, or
the world in the past 15 years I have been housing gear in Data Centr
Hmm yes actually deciding to do this during business hours does appear
to be an odd choice, even with two PSU in the server, they would be
better off doing this out of business hours I would of thought.
Regards Chad.
On 8/10/2017 2:56 PM, Nathan Brookfield wrote:
Chad,
That's all well and g
Chad,
That's all well and good but when you're paying a premium price for services of
this fashion you expect a certain level of service. There is a risk no matter
what when switching from power supplies taking extra load they would not
usually take as well as swing load issues with PDU's.
I
On 8/10/2017 10:13 AM, ausnog-requ...@lists.ausnog.net wrote:
From the latest update today, It appears that most of the works are being
postponed for the time being
Not all devices within racks support 2 feeds and planning is involved with
these devices, which is why it is crucial to receiv
Smells of them having to lift the supply neutral to the input of the UPS
stacks. This would require a shutdown of the entire eqipment if the
Natural earth bond needs to be split for whatever reason. (Although I
have done a temporary bond in DC's before to keep the UPS array going
but a lot of
Hi Simon,
Maybe it could be helpful to the Ausnog list to point us to that law you refer
too?
As I personally have never heard or seen this done in any DC in Australia, or
the world in the past 15 years I have been housing gear in Data Centres.
I agree that gear should have 2N, and it doesn’t
On 10 August 2017 at 09:21, Cameron Murray wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Been fighting a weird issue for the past week with a AAPT resold Telstra
> Wholesale DA service.
>
> The service was completed last week and successfully tests by both carriers
> however with the customers Mikrotik device the service do
Dear All
Anyone with single power supply devices please do not look at getting an ATS,
get a STS !!!
Short version
ATS (Automatic Transfer Switch) will typically break power before it makes,
thus the connected device could reboot !!
STS (Static Transfer Switch) will make power before it break
+1
Every DC agreement I’ve seen (3) have mentioned that you are responsible for
supplying it with power and they aren’t responsible if it loses power (i.e. use
an ATS).
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Sam Silvester
Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2017 10:14 AM
To: Sh
If you have single fed equipment in your rack that needs planning before it
can be shut down, do you not run a totally forseeable and preventable risk
then should that one feed trip?
This is what ATS are for.
Sam
On Thursday, 10 August 2017, Shaun McGuane wrote:
> HI Simon,
>
>
>
> Thank you
HI Simon,
Thank you for your input to the list.
While you may have provided notifications well in advance, your schedule
provided has been changed multiple times and this creates confusion.
Without asking for further clarification last night I would never have received
the following updated sch
Guys,
Been fighting a weird issue for the past week with a AAPT resold Telstra
Wholesale DA service.
The service was completed last week and successfully tests by both carriers
however with the customers Mikrotik device the service does not function
correctly with only RX data within a tagged vla
Great to hear.
I currently run Mikrotik router, switches and WAPs at home. So I was
thinking of getting a Mikrotik or Ubiquiti PtP wireless link up. Just
connecting to who is the question at this point.
Regards,
John.
On 2017-08-09 20:38, James Braunegg wrote:
> Dear John
>
> Absolutely t
An off-the-cuff observation with little real thought put into it:
offloading an A feed in one hall and a B feed in the other (if at the same
time) seems a reasonable method - intentional or not - of keeping the
cumulative data centre load even across feeds.
They should be fine standalone anywa
Thanks guys, appreciate the feedback.At NEXTDC we work very hard to keep critical infrastructure maintenance that impacts racks or the environment within the data hall to an absolute minimum.However, some works are required to happen from time to time by law and one of those activities is a de
This seems reasonable? As long as no single Data Hall has both A and B
feeds removed simultaneously, that seems normal. Doing B on Hall 2 and A on
Hall 3 on the same day does seem slightly adventurous, but not entirely
unreasonable (mostly in terms of if something goes bad in both, staff get
stretc
Unfortunately Brismesh and Darling Downs Wireless are long gone. And nothing
seems to have ever really taken off to replace them.
I had assumed that Melbourne Wireless had suffered the same fate due to the
website.
Wouldn't have thrown out all my old kit last year if I'd known!
Edward
>
I’ve been meaning to look into the Melbourne wireless scene since moving here.
Good to hear there is still a network up and running. The website made me
assume it was pretty dead.
Regards,
John M
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of James
Braunegg
Sent: Wednesda
Dear John
Absolutely this is still active and alive, Micron21 sponsors equipment for
Melbourne Wireless on our datacentre roof and provides a selection of IPv4 /
IPv6 internet routes to members.
Kindest Regards,
James Braunegg
[cid:image001.png@01D280A4.01865B60]
1300 769 972 / 0488 997 20
I live in the SE Suburbs, and while I am not currently participating, still get
alerts for new activity in our area with new nodes being setup on an infrequent
basis.
I am high on a hill overlooking much of the SE suburbs - so it's always been of
interest - just never got around to it.
Cheer
Likewise for Sydney.
Matt.
On 9/8/17 18:32, James Hodgkinson wrote:
Hopefully this isn't too off topic - is there a Brisbane equivalent
these days?
James
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, at 16:26, John Lowry wrote:
Thanks, Much Appreciated.
On 2017-08-09 16:12, David Dunn wrote:
Hi John,
I'll p
Hopefully this isn't too off topic - is there a Brisbane equivalent
these days?
James
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, at 16:26, John Lowry wrote:
> Thanks, Much Appreciated.
>
>
> On 2017-08-09 16:12, David Dunn wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I'll put you in touch off-list with one of the committe
27 matches
Mail list logo
