On 15/3/09 02:32, Andy Halsall wrote:
I concur with his viewpoint that business models are being broken
faster than new ones can be invented.
Business models and distribution methods, the demand for high quality content
however remains constant
Really? Do we have metrics...? I'd love to see
On 15/3/09 02:12, Sean DALY wrote:
http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/
I was fascinated by this piece.
Example: Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism.
Related theme in Juan Cole's blog recently,
As an American who worked for the BBC for eight years, it's interesting to
see some of the comments here and say that they aren't entirely accurate.
It's not correct to conflate PBS and NPR. Although both public, they are
funded with slightly different mechanisms and are different organisationally
On Sunday 15 March 2009 07:45:27 Dan Brickley wrote:
On 15/3/09 02:32, Andy Halsall wrote:
I concur with his viewpoint that business models are being broken
faster than new ones can be invented.
Business models and distribution methods, the demand for high quality
content however
2009/3/15 Kevin Anderson global...@gmail.com:
As for Clay's piece, it's one of the best of a kind. I would say that much
of the discussion here is confusing public funding with a business model.
I think the phrase business model is colloquially used as funding
model for people for whom the
On Sunday 15 March 2009 14:55:43 Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/15 Kevin Anderson global...@gmail.com:
As for Clay's piece, it's one of the best of a kind. I would say that
much of the discussion here is confusing public funding with a business
model.
I think the phrase business model is
2009/3/15 Andy Halsall andyhals...@ictsc.com:
On Sunday 15 March 2009 14:55:43 Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/15 Kevin Anderson global...@gmail.com:
As for Clay's piece, it's one of the best of a kind. I would say that
much of the discussion here is confusing public funding with a business
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 16:36 +, Dave Crossland wrote:
But make money for whom? Those doing the activity at the core of the
profession - in the case of newspapers, the reporters; in the case of
music, the artists - or for those involved in the profession in roles
peripheral to it's core,
Kevin Charman-Anderson wrote:
But Dave, taking a swing from the barricades at the profiteering
publishers sounds lovely but it comes close to ignoring the pain and
economic dislocation that journalists are going through at the moment.
We're not the only ones hurting in this recession, but
I would venture to add it's even worse for print journalists, who
generally speaking in the past had a stressful day to make deadline
then time off was time off.
Nowadays, print journalists covering a beat are often expected to file
online from wherever they are if there is breaking news in their
This is probably as good a place as any to report this - the Audio on Demand
XML feeds (e.g http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/availability/radio4.xml ) seem
to be broken. They don't appear to have updated since the 12th March.
Hopefully it's just a case of a simple spot of percussive maintenance on
Same issue was reported over on the Reciva forums. I tried to alert
James Cridland via Twitted and pretty sure that others have tried via
the email address at the top of the XML.
Looks like BBC iPlayer is deriving data from elsewhere. If it was the
same place as made available to 3rd-parties
12 matches
Mail list logo
