On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:25 PM Tim Evans wrote:
> However, I still get the above error when trying to access the server's
> web admin pages. Further investigation shows the following error in the
> httpd (Apache) web server error_log:
>
> [Tue Feb 20 06:36:00.553934 2024] [cgid:error] [pid
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:58 PM Kenneth Porter
wrote:
> My company has a laptop that spends most of its time on a shelf, not in
> use. So I'm constantly seeing a daily BackupPC alert in my email that
> the machine hasn't been backed up recently.
>
> How do others deal with this situation, with
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:10 AM Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users <
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Could you try the bpc-rsync master code from github? Just clone the
> repository and build it. I did some commits in July 2021 that were after
> the latest release.
>
Are you
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:02 PM wrote:
> I have an issue on my server, causing it to crash with out-of-memory
> errors. It eventually just causes the virtual server to abort. I can’t find
> a log with relevant information for this. Does anyone know where I can look
> at a log file or what might
Standard disclaimer, I'm not a btrfs expert...
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 6:52 AM John Botha (SourceForge) <
sourcefo...@yellowacorn.com> wrote:
> From what I've read, btrfs (like many file systems) suffers over time when
> fragmentation increases. I have seen suggestions such as not to put data
>
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:26 AM Paul Leyland wrote:
>
> Very happy with ZFS myself. YMMV.
>
If only they would move to a FOSS license instead of CDDL it could be
included in the mainline kernel.
Thanks,
Richard
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:00 PM Robert Trevellyan <
robert.trevell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:41 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:25 PM Robert Trevellyan
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm pretty sure my Ubuntu systems are not using FUSE to access ZFS. If
>> that
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 7:44 AM Arnar Þórarinsson <
arnar.thorarins...@isavia.is> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> BackupPC install via EPEL
>
> # rpm -qa | grep -i backup
>
> BackupPC-4.4.0-1.el8.x86_64
>
> BackupPC-XS-0.62-1.el8.x86_64
>
>
>
> Also, dnf info backuppc does suggest looking at README.setup
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:45 PM Arnar Þórarinsson <
arnar.thorarins...@isavia.is> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
Hellow. I'm the current maintainer of BackupPC for Fedora and EPEL.
> I‘m a new user of BackupPC with some questions (moving away from Amanda).
>
> OS: CentOS 8.3
>
> BackupPC version 4.4.0
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 2:01 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 1:39 PM Raoul Bhatia wrote:
> >
> >> I understand that packages can also be done badly, but if I do not trust
> > pre-packaged software, there are normally easy ways to package myself.
> >
> > Anybody care to share
I've largely stayed out of the discussion since CentOS was not listed as an
option :) However, CentOS Stream will live on. I currently maintain
BackupPC for Fedora and CentOS/RHEL,etc, via Fedora EPEL.
I currently keep backups at home via a small CentOS Stream server so I am
likely to notice
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Berteaud
wrote:
> All this workflow can be seen in my virt-backup script [1], which is a
> helper for BackupPC to backup libvirt managed VM.
>
Daniel,
I'd like to talk to you about formally packaging your script for Fedora /
EPEL. I just packaged chunkfs
So long story short, a lot of it will depend on how fast your data
changes/grows, but it doesn't necessarily require a high end computer. You
really just need something beefy enough as to not be the bottleneck. If you
can make the client I/O the bottleneck, then you're good. Depending on your
Not a direct response to your question but I run my to backup computers at
my home, so quite a bit smaller scale, however, the 4th gen i5 SFF PC I
bought off Ebay w/ 1TB hard drive dedicated to BackupPC and M.2 SSD for
CentOS 8 works quite well for me, so a REAL computer should do fine. I did
max
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:44 PM Robert E. Wooden
wrote:
> I rebuilt a machine to update to CentOS 8 and ease upgrades because
> BackupPC v.4.40 (as of 2020-10-28) is available via epel & PowerTools repo
> per this:
> https://kifarunix.com/install-and-configure-backuppc-on-centos-8/
>
> I created
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:02 AM Mike Hughes wrote:
> Certainly a mismatch. Here's my output. Hopefully it formats cleanly. How
> can I fix this while waiting for the patch to roll out?
>
Well, I'm not sure how to clean up the mess, but the problem is simple. You
don't want to mix manual cpan
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:19 PM Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users <
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> It's possible you have two different versions of perl installed, or for
> some reason the BackupPC user is seeing an old version of BackupPC::XS.
>
> Try some of the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:58 AM Mike Hughes wrote:
> I'm getting a service startup failure claiming my version of BackupPC-XS
> isn't up-to-snuff but it appears to meet the requirements:
>
> BackupPC: old version 0.57 of BackupPC::XS: need >= 0.62; exiting in 30s
>
I don't have a CentOS 7
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mike Hughes wrote:
> Thanks so much Richard! Will COPR installations auto-update via yum
> repository updates or do we need to specifically run a COPR update manually?
>
Yes, as long as you install the repo file it will work just like any other
repository.
Builds complete and updates submitted for Fedora and CentOS 8
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=BackupPC
CentOS 7 builds available via COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/BackupPC/
Thanks,
Richard
___
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:14 PM Bob Wooden wrote:
> For those of you who may not be aware of this.
>
> In the process of building a replacement machine (hardware update) I
> have discovered that CentOS 8, the EPEL repo offers BackupPC 4.3.2. (The
> CentOS 7 EPEL repo offers BackupPC 3.3.2.)
>
>
Just to close the loop on this, the command worked. Ironically the only
files it found that failed checksum are 4 resource/texture packs from two
steam games.
Due to podman/docker/wine there are a LOT of symbolic links which rsync
mentioned making it difficult to see what files would actually be
Well I'm trying to following to see if it finds any files that need to be
transferred:
I created a "user_backup" directory and then restored the last known good
backup to it
And then:
rsync --dry-run -ruh --checksum --existing /home/user_backup /home/user
The --checksum means it's very slow
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:27 AM G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users <
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > ...
> > Is it possible to do a conditional restore? Something like:
> >
> >
So this is probably too complicated but I recently had a disk go bad but I
was able to copy most of the data off. I almost decided to restore from
backup anyway because I know some of the files are corrupted, but my backup
server had been down a few days because I was rearranging my data closet so
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:32 AM Greg Harris
wrote:
> There’s no dot on the first one.
>
That's another form I found when browsing through a backup.
Thanks,
Richard
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:
I tried to upgrade my CentOS 7 box to CentOS 8 (through reinstall and
preserving of /etc) but it went sideways and I lost everything so I had to
setup BackupPC from scratch.
Getting the rsync excludes right has always been a problem for me. I'm not
volunteering to start it but (I've got WAY too
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:15 AM ED Fochler
wrote:
> I would expect no difference for small file performance between rsync and
> ssh-rsync. The ssh overhead on a modern system limits data rate to
> something like 75MB/s, nearly saturating a gigabit link. It seems you have
> basic filesystem
No need to do a completely fresh install. There should be a file,
/etc/BackupPC/config.pl.rpmnew, this is the file that would have been
installed had it been a fresh install. You can compare it with your current
config but it's likely that there's too many differences for that to be
effective with
I am the current BackupPC package maintainer for Fedora / EPEL but I only
use it in a home environment. I don't consider myself and expert so I was
waiting to see if anyone else responded first but I had a few minutes so I
deleted a file out of my home directory and restored it.
My current setup
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:12 PM wrote:
>
> --- BackupPC_dump.orig 2020-02-02 10:30:49.0 -0500
> +++ BackupPC_dump 2020-02-02 10:34:28.955761936 -0500
> @@ -1871,6 +1871,9 @@
> my $noDelete = $i + 1 < @$Backups ? $Backups->[$i+1]{noFill}
> : 0;
>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:26 AM Systems wrote:
> Can you rename the ID of the backup folder so that the cronjob doesn’t
> delete it?
>
>
>
> mv /var/lib/BackupPC/pc//
> /var/lib/BackupPC/pc//Keep-
>
Couldn't that have unintended consequences with the reference counting?
Also, deduplication as
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 5:08 AM Graham Seaman
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to be able to mark some older full backups as 'frozen', not to
>> be deleted. Is that possible? I can't find any mention of this in the
>> docs.
>
>
I don't think it's possible to mark one specific backup to keep, it's not
Ok, so I figured it out but it might be worth documenting somewhere...
I haven't done a from scratch install in MANY years (speaks to how well it
works once setup!) so when I setup my hosts I chose DHCP because all of my
hosts are using DHCP to get a reserved IP address from my USG.
I finally
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:28 AM Doug Lytle wrote:
>
>> You can also attache to the BackupPC process to see what's going on with
>>
>> strace -ewrite -p PID#
>>
>
Ok, so I need to address why it has problems
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:28 AM Doug Lytle wrote:
> You can also attache to the BackupPC process to see what's going on with
>
> strace -ewrite -p PID#
>
Well darn, it worked in CentOS 7 but I'm remoting in from work via PuTTY
and using port forwarding from my exposed machine to the backupc
Sorry, I was trying to get the email out this morning before heading to
work, could have provided more details but hoped it was something simple
someone ran into before...
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:23 AM Systems wrote:
> What type of backup are you requesting? Rsyn/smb ?
>
rsync
> What
So I've been using BackupPC successfully for MANY years on Fedora and
CentOS 7 (I'm even the Fedora / EPEL package maintainer) but something has
got me stumped on CentOS 8 after a new install.
I did work through a few issues which I went back and fixed in the RPM spec
file, but I've got
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Romain Pelissier <
romain.peliss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently upgrade my fedora server to the 26 version and it come
> with the brand new version of Backuppc!
> I have change the a couple of things to make it works, like now I use SGSI
> and alos
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Service technique
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a virtual machine running BackupPC 4.1.3.
>
> I plan to use two different storage device to store backups, an iSCSI
> image with hight availability and a NFS share on an remote server.
>
> But with
I was hoping someone would have answered you by now...
I think the long term answer is to update to 4.x where it won't be a
problem anymore but I have a feeling trying to upgrade while you're already
out of inodes would be a disaster.
Any chance you could install a parallel 4.x server with new
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Ray Frush wrote:
> Do you have selinux enabled? I encountered significant challenges
> getting BackupPC and SELinux to play nice with each other. Check
> /var/log/audit/audit.log for a report.
>
The good thing about using my package
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Akibu Flash wrote:
> Thanks Richard. See below:
>
>
>
> -r--rw-rw-. 1 root root47 Jul 12 21:36 apache.users
>
>
>
I don't really have a good way to deal with this from a packaging
perspective, I'll review the readme's and see
A ls -l /etc/BackupPC may be more useful. I thought I had fixed that...
Thanks,
Richard
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Berteaud <
dan...@firewall-services.com> wrote:
> Le 15/06/2017 à 15:53, Michael Stowe a écrit :
>
>
> I looked on my own setup to answer this question, since I used a similar
> method under 3.x and have been backing up the local systems under 4.x since
>
Bob,
Here's where I'm still struggling a bit but I can give you this hint...
Those options are sparated into two parts. The share to match (where you
have already put the directory) and the files/directories to be excluded
(the add button on the right hand side which you have blank).
Also, most
I didn't have to modify the user BackupPC or apache runs as but I did
change the group on config.pl from backuppc to apache and that seems to
work for me...
# ll /etc/BackupPC/
total 96
-rw-r-. 1 backuppc backuppc46 Jan 20 2013 apache.users
-rw-r-. 1 backuppc apache 82263 May 11
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Tim Evans <tkev...@tkevans.com> wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 12:57 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> The main thing is to merge config.pl <http://config.pl>. Your old one
>> should not be overwritten and the new one from the 4.x p
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
> I have BackupPC-3.3.1-7.fc25.x86_64 installed on Fedora 25. Stopped
> using it a good while back when the Samba changes screwed things up.
> Could never get the patches to 3.x to work for me. My backup pool is
> now more
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Vladislav Kurz
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> First of all big thanks to all developers of BackupPC, it is really a
> very nice and useful backup tool.
>
> I use DumpPreUserCmd (and similar options) to run mysqldump, or make
> snapshots of
The easy way to exchange keys on Fedora to use rsync over ssh assuming
you're using root to do the backup on the clien:
(as root)
# su -s /bin/bash -l backuppc
# ssh-keygen
(don't add a passphrase, it would defeat the purpose)
# ssh-copy-id root@
After that you should be able to "ssh root@" and
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Robert Katz wrote:
> > Hi guys. I was about to bind a second mount for my convenience in fstab
> > for topdir. I then read man bind and learned about the danger of
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Bob Katz wrote:
> Thanks, Richard.
>
> OK, got it. Don't want to futz with symbolic links. I'll change fstab to
> mount the RAID in the approved directory.
>
> Why wouldn't this be fixed, though, if we run the configure script with a
> new
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Robert Katz wrote:
> Guys
>
> I installed backuppc into my Fedora 26 using, simply "dnf install BackupPC"
>
> I found that the main files have been placed in /etc/BackupPC/
>
> So I started working my way through editing config.pl (after
If you are trying to install BackupPC on your newly upgraded Fedora 26 box
there's no need for any additional repositories.
A simple "dnf install BackupPC" will work (as root or with sudo on the
front of the command)
In either case, the two RPMs you are installing are source RPMS, meaning
it's
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Bob Katz wrote:
> Those were VERY old packages that I attempted to install in a very new
> system. The 3DM2 software is long into End of Life. There is no support,
> though some of the old 3DM2 people are working at Broadcom I might be able
>
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bob Katz wrote:
> Hi, guys. Still working towards install of Backuppc on my Fedora. I
> apologize that I got Fedora and Redhat mixed up. I definitely am using
> Fedora!
>
> At the end of the day today I somehow got it in my head that the
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Berteaud <
dan...@firewall-services.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, and thanks for your packages.
> Unfortunatly, it cannot be installed on EL6 as there's no par2cmdline for
> this version. As this is an optional feature, could you relaxe it ? (or
> enclose in Requires
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Bob Katz <bobk...@digido.com> wrote:
> On 5/9/17 9:37 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> What version are you running? 5 / 6 / 7?
>
>
> I finally figured out, Richard you are asking me about my Redhat version!
> Well, it reports as Fedo
Replying just to the user list...
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:36 PM, daveinredm...@excite.com <
daveinredm...@excite.com> wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed v4.1.2 on OpenSUSE Leap 42.2??? I am
> considering migrating my sever from Ubuntu to OpenSUSE, but have not been
> able to
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Bob Katz <bobk...@digido.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/17 8:29 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Bob Katz <bobk...@digido.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Richard and list!
>>
>> Does the EPEL and COPR installe
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Can't you name the package backuppc4 so they can have overlapping life
> spans and updates? Seems safer than putting a same-named package in
> a different repo where a future update will probably accidentally pull
>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Bob Katz wrote:
> Thanks, Richard and list!
>
> Does the EPEL and COPR installer for backuppc recognize that backuppc has
> already been installed and overwrite it? I don't mind overwriting. I just
> want to know if the installer covers
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Bob Katz <bobk...@digido.com> wrote:
> Dear Richard.
> On 5/9/17 9:37 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Bob Katz <bobk...@digido.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> I've got too much time invested
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical
Mechanics Associates, INC.] wrote:
>
> Is there a timeline for when version 4.x will appear in the main epel repo?
Because there's not really an automated upgrade path with the extensiveness
of the
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Bob Katz wrote:
> Dear Daniel and Richard and group:
>
> Sorry, I'm not familiar with all the acronyms.
> I'm very excited to see a repository for Fedora/Redhat!
>
> When I go to the EPEL repository page
>
>
>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Bob Katz wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I've got too much time invested in Redhat to try Debian ;-(
>
What version are you running? 5 / 6 / 7?
I'm currently building for CentOS/RHEL in my COPR[1] but I don't have any
testing reports from anything
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Ray Frush wrote:
> I believe the install documentation acknowledges that BackupPC isn't
> SELinux aware, and advises you to disable SELinux on the server you're
> using to run BackupPC.
>
> An interesting project would be to create a
Been available for a while on my COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/BackupPC/
Must have missed the announcement.
Requires EXTRAS+EPEL repositories.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Check out the vibrant tech
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Nicholas Hall wrote:
> Good question!
>
> I have an update: everything works fine when started via systemd when I
> change the unit file to Type=forking. Wondering how reproducible the
> problem is on other platforms...
>
I was going to ask
Hmm... nothing jumping out at me there... I don't use SCGI so I'm not
familiar with it but systemd works fine on my CentOS 7 and Fedora boxes...
Now one thing to consider is that when systemd runs a process it's not in a
shell and doesn't get a standard environment... Are there any environment
May not help any but what about:
(after systemd startup)
# systemctl status backuppc
and
# systemctl cat backuppc
Thanks,
Richard
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Kenneth Porter <sh...@sewingwitch.com>
wrote:
> On 4/7/2017 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Just make sure you have Fedora EPEL installed
> > For some of the dependencies.
>
> I found I also needed to install this yum plugin with a raw
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:36 PM Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Friday, April 07, 2017 2:02 PM -0600 Michael McGregor
> wrote:
>
> > sudo cpan BackupPC::XS
>
> Instead of CPAN, consider using Richard Shaw's RPM:
>
>
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Adam Goryachev <
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au> wrote:
> I don't think it is a permissions issue (at least not a unix permissions
> issue). Check your apache error log to ensure there is nothing there.
> I expect the problem is that you haven't told backuppc
I think I figured it out...
I'm not sure if I should automate this in the packaging or not but you just
need to add apache to the backuppc group...
usermod -a -G backuppc apache
You may have to reboot for it to take effect since you can't "login" as
apache...
Thanks,
Richard
It should not be necessary to run apache as the backuppc user. When I have
some time I may have to setup a CentOS 7 box up from scratch. I'm not sure
at this point what I've tweaked but I'm not having the same problem.
Thanks,
Richard
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Bob of Donelson Trophy <
b...@donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
> Thank you for that clarity, Richard.
>
> The slight differences is how a user does this or that between the two
> distros (CentOS and Debian/Ubuntu) elude me at times. For give my
> ignorance, I have not
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy <
b...@donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
> On 2017-03-30 07:19, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> >>>> snipped for brevity <<<<<
>
>
>
> As the first attempt failed, the second went just fine.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Holger Parplies <wb...@parplies.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Shaw wrote on 2017-03-30 07:19:11 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
> BackupPC v4 for Fedora / EPEL Update]:
> > [...]
> > > Error: Package: BackupPC-4.1.0-1.el7.cen
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Bob of Donelson Trophy <
b...@donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
> On 2017-03-29 16:29, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Alright guys, I went ahead and created a COPR for BackupPC...
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/BackupPC/
&g
Alright guys, I went ahead and created a COPR for BackupPC...
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/BackupPC/
You just have to go in and download the repository file and copy to
/etc/yum.repos.d/
It uses the same name so a simple "yum update" should pick it up...
It SHOULD save
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical
Mechanics Associates, INC.] wrote:
>
> Now that 4.1 is out is there an updated idea when the EPEL package hits
> for el7? I’m itching to see how much better my performance is running
> parallel over our
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy <
b...@donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
> I now have a functional VM running Ubuntu 16.04LTS and BackupPC 4.0 (from
> the master) source.
>
> I have "su - backuppc -s /bin/sh" and acquired the "$" prompt.
>
> Generated the keys with "ssh-keygen".
I wanted to give a quick update on the status of BackupPC v4 for Fedora and
EPEL 6 & 7.
Currently I'm fighting a configuration problem with Apache and the C
wrapper which allows BackupPC_Admin to run as suid. I think I have a
solution but I haven't had time to test it.
Even after I get a working
I've got the package building, installing, and even starting the server but
I can't get the webpage to work, still have some debugging to do.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Craig Barratt <
cbarr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I just pushed to git (https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/commit/
> 51e579bae854ec78573cff9c3ff36ee589286502) these changes:
>
>- BackupPC exits with status 0 on TERM signal
>- systemd file now
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> > I actually plan on starting with a COPR for testing purposes since I
> don't
> > wa
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Craig Barratt <
cbarr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Both INT and TERM are handled the same way, so they should be equivalent.
>
Ok, back from a work trip so I can look at this again...
I should have mentioned I'm experimenting with my CentOS 7
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Kenneth Porter
wrote:
> I know Benjamin Lefoul took over as packager for Fedora. Benjamin, is there
> an RPM coming soon for v4? I've got a CentOS 7 system suitable for testing
> it on.
I actually just recently took over maintainership of
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical
Mechanics Associates, INC.] wrote:
> Do you have any target date in mind to have the epel package ready to
> update from 3.x to 4.x? So I can tell my boss.
>
The new version has two new dependencies,
Craig,
I noticed you set ExecStop to use SIGHUP to stop BackupPC but it looks like
the sysv script uses SIGTERM...
What is the correct way to tell BackupPC to stop?
There is the options KillMode and KillSignal to tell systemd how to stop
the process.
Thanks,
Richard
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Moorcroft, Mark (ARC-TS)[Analytical
Mechanics Associates, INC.] wrote:
>
>
> I’m curious since el7 has been the current OS for a pretty long time why
> the “new” version of BackupPC defaults to init.d? I will probably wait for
> the epel
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Holger Parplies wb...@parplies.de wrote:
Hi,
backu...@kosowsky.org wrote on 2013-07-23 09:01:09 -0400 [Re:
[BackupPC-users] Move BackupPC TopDir To New Larger Hard Drive]:
Aaron Cossey wrote at about 14:13:26 +0200 on Tuesday, July 23, 2013:
Sorry but
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com wrote:
Backups are being stored on separate partition, not standard for BackupPC:
/bkupdata
Standard BackupPC storage location:
/var/lib/BackupPC
I actually ran into something like the on a paid contracting job,
except that I
Just a shameless plug here...
I was upgrading my old Fedora 14 MythTV box to CentOS 6.3 which
didn't go so well on the MythTV front, but that's another story. Well
when that didn't work I decided to go with Fedora 17.
In both cases I have a /var lvm partition but since all my pictures,
movies,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:38 AM, draccusfly
backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
I inherited an existing backuppc system which is working in the main but
there are a couple of issues that I am troubleshooting. 1 is email not going
out, so I logged on to the server and tried to run su
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Cassiano Surek c...@surek.co.uk wrote:
Hello all,
This is my first post to the list, so please be gentle. :)
I have been running a backuppc server for a while, but recently it has
been running way too slow to be useful.
Mike is the guru here but I'll do my
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Robert E. Wooden rbrte...@comcast.net wrote:
I have been using Backuppc for a few years now. Recently I upgraded my
machine to newer, faster hardware. Hence, I have experience exchanging ssh
keys, etc.
It seems I have one client that refuses to connect via
Disclaimer: I think I know what I'm talking about, but I'm not 100%.
I'm sure the experts here will correct me if I'm wrong.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:17 AM, jonas jo...@freesources.org wrote:
Now BackupPC has a full backup of all clients. Unfortunately it starts
with full backups again as the
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo