On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Lawrence San wrote:
I still have my 4.5 CD in a box somewhere...
Bah, you kids today. I remember when BBEdit came sandwiched between two rocks
-- the same rocks we used to grind our meat with. That's why they called it
bare bones.
*Snicker* I still have my
Firstly, thanks to the people who are helpful and make this forum a
nice place to visit.
Since joining this group, I have been amazed at the overall negativity
and whining of this user base, but this thread takes the cake. I used
to be a TextMate user but finally accepted that its continued
I think one problem has been the incessant trumpeting on arrival of BBEdit 10.
Has it raised unrealistic expectations? It's only a text editor for heavens
sake. I think we need to maintain a sense of proportion.
Peter
Sent from my mobile
On 21 Aug 2011, at 09:35 AM, John Delacour
I think it is time to snip this thread :)
François
On Aug 21, 2011, at 1:46 AM, Jon wrote:
Firstly, thanks to the people who are helpful and make this forum a
nice place to visit.
Since joining this group, I have been amazed at the overall negativity
and whining of this user base, but
What ding-dong thought it a good idea to force the pane on the left
(files, forced their btw) to open EVERY D*MN time a document is
opened? Really? Are you f***ing kidding me? Every time I open a file,
that stupid pane jams my edit area to the right, and I have to command
+ 0 AGAIN. I open 200 to
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:28 AM, MacCooler wrote:
What ding-dong thought it a good idea to force the pane on the left
(files, forced their btw) to open EVERY D*MN time a document is
opened? Really? Are you f***ing kidding me? Every time I open a file,
that stupid pane jams my edit area to the
Wow. Somebody's having a bad day...
RTFM
And then try being a little more polite before asking for help next time.
Ted
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To
The only reasonable response to people who are *this* mean is to laugh at them.
And laugh I did.
— dpk
Sent from my iPhone
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:46:04 -0400, Herbert Schulz
he...@wideopenwest.com wrote:
Sure, be nasty, that will get you lots of help!
I found it rather humorous. I do not know if that was his intention.
Aaron W. Hsu
--
Programming is just another word for the lost Art of Thinking.
--
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:10:31 +0100, G. T. Stresen-Reuter
tedmaster...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. Somebody's having a bad day...
RTFM
And then try being a little more polite before asking for help next time.
I don't see him asking for help. I see him venting his frustration
after spending too much
On Aug 20, 2011, at 1:03 PM, David Alexander wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:10:31 +0100, G. T. Stresen-Reuter
tedmaster...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. Somebody's having a bad day...
RTFM
And then try being a little more polite before asking for help next time.
I don't see him asking for
I stand corrected. He wasn't asking for help. He was indeed just
venting.
I wonder if that helped him (or her) solve his (or her) issues...
Ted
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
RTFM is ruder and has even less value than the original comment.
Just to clarify, had the original poster read the manual, as a prior reply
suggested, he/she would have seen that there were already solutions to the
complaints. Instead, he/she
David Alexander wrote:
It's quite obvious from the message traffic over the past couple
months that BB really missed the mark with some of the enhancements
in v10.
It's also quite obvious from the message traffic over the past few
months that there's been a HUGE influx of new BBEdit users.
On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Watts Martin wrote:
users who've been using BBEdit for a very, very long time
I still have my 4.5 CD in a box somewhere... I can even remember reviewers
going on and on about what great support it had for HTML!
Ted
--
You received this message because you are
G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
I still have my 4.5 CD in a box somewhere... I can even remember
reviewers going on and on about what great support it had for HTML!
That beats me by quite a distance. :) I started with BBEdit 6.0 after
switching to the Mac from Windows, and buying BBEdit on the
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
On Aug 20, 2011, at 1:28 AM, MacCooler wrote:
GET THE PICTURE?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group
On Aug 20, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 16:48 -0500 on 08/20/2011, Neil Tiffin wrote about Re: Why BBE pisses me
off:
The key is balancing the needs/desires of many different types of users and
without usability professionals involved it will be wrong.
Or get your
On Aug 20, 2011, at 5:38 PM, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Watts Martin wrote:
users who've been using BBEdit for a very, very long time
I still have my 4.5 CD in a box somewhere... I can even remember reviewers
going on and on about what great support it had
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:35:11 +0100, G. T. Stresen-Reuter
tedmaster...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree that venting is valuable feedback for developers. To me, valuable
feedback is a use case followed by usability data that supports one
implementation or another.
I completely disagree with that.
20 matches
Mail list logo
